Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
It also took multiple phone calls to the dealer and finally a letter to the Honda district office to get the dealer to stop sending me maintenance reminders and promotional materials.
rockycow
The CR-V seems more refined in most respects with lighter steering, tighter shifting, better brakes, nicer controls, etc. I find the new I-VTEC in the CR-V a better motor with less vibration and a flatter torque curve. The CR-V has lower gearing hence is much "sportier" around town but revs higher on the highway. The taller CR-V is nice in traffic, especially in the winter with the spray and stuff. Slightly more room in the CR-V but remember it is based on the Civic hence is only taller, really. I also find the build quality on the CR-V slightly better although the difference is minute (and subjective, I'm sure). I also believe the CR-V will get very good crash test scores considering the Civic (which it is based on) received outstanding frontal offset scores. The EX with side airbags, dual stage seat belts, etc., make it a safer vehicle than the Accord.
The Accord, however, is a better highway cruiser. The highway mileage will be considerably better (simply a smaller frontal area) and it revs 500 rpm lower at 120kph in 5th. Also, the strut front end in the CR-V does lead to slightly vague and unsteady stability at highway speed - nothing alarming but not as "easy" to drive as the Accord on the highway. The Accord SE also has heated seats and a moon roof which are nice (but the SE does not have the 6 disk changer and side airbags).
Overall the CR-V feels like a 2002 design while the Accord a 1998 design (amazing, eh?). I suspect the 03 Accord will change this.
My wife is a die hard Honda person, especially Accords. We ditched a Ford Windstar for the CR-V and she loves the thing, especially in the snow. However, she still likes the Accord (especially the heated seats). The CR-V wins her over, but barely.
In the end its a tough call. I do like the CR-V better, but here's an example of how good both are:
We are taking the kids (4 and 2) down to Myrtle Beach in March and we cannot decide which vehicle to take! The CR-V has more room and is safer, while the Accord is easier to drive on the highway, gets better mileage, and has substantially more range on a tank of gas (bigger tank and better mileage).
Remember, this compares the 4 cyl. Accord. I cannot comment on the 6 cyl. In the end I like the CR-V better, but the Accord is pretty damn good as well! It really depends on what you really want.
To #5524 - rsholland - The owner's manual contains instructions on running thru the gears and letting it idle in neutral for 3 minutes and take off. Again, I tow it 70mph, all day, with no problem.
Best of all, the speedo it electronic, so when you are towing, it does not register miles!
In Canada MSRP for the 02 Accord EX V6 is $31,100.00, The 02 CR-V EX with Leather is $32,200.00 This CR-V is $1000.00 more. To convert to the US dollar divide by 1.6 .Check at www.honda.ca for pricing and feature packages. My 99 Accord EX V6 is a fine car especially on the highway. The dealer said my CR-V will be built on Feb. 14th and should arrive here on March 7th. Any other comparison oppinions between these two vehicles are welcome.
Since you too will be a dual owner, we look forward to your review.
Close up
Another close up
To me the big comparison is the '02 V 5 speed vs our previous 2000 CR-V auto, loaded. Here is how the new V blows it away.
1) Ton of torque and HP - no comparison. It just begs to be booted. Great acceleration.
2) Safety. Side bags, better restraints, anti-whiplash front seats, and it should get max. scores on offset tests etc. Older v got a 'marginal' score.
3) Roominess. We had 2 hockey bag and sticks, 1 huge suitcase, 3 small ones, and a small ice cooler neatly tucked away in back storage - no problem. I am 6'3" and can put the front seat all the way back, reclined, and then sit in the back seat with a little extra legroom.
4) 6-CD loader and tunes. Much, much better.
5) quietness. No comparison. At idle, you cannot hear it. On highway it sound like the old v at idle even though it is revving at 3000! A really nice improvement. It realy is quiet.
6) Instrument panel at night is much nicer. Includes heated mirrors and temp guage.
7) BONUS. All the V-s I looked at had those junky Bridgestones on it, but my sight-unseen V arrived with BF Goodrich Touring TAs. Same as our older V. Mileage rating is about 2x higher. Anyone have any idea why the same plant sending the identical model (Ex 5 speed) would send some with junk and some with goof tires? Weird.
Things I don't like.
1) The colour combinations. We got the red one with the tan interior. My kid spilled orange juice before I could scotchguard it to protect its 'lovely' colour. The tan really sucks if you have kids (hello Honda - how about red exterior with....wait for it....the dark interior???).
2) The gas tank seems small. I didn't run the tank down, but it seemed as though I was going through half a tank in 225km. Perhaps it has a big reserve.
3) I miss my arm rests.
Overall, the new V is a really fun car to drive and it should excel in safety. Don't believe that V-6 crap you read about in simple comparisons to the Vue, Escape, and Hyundai. The new V will take 'em all on and spit them out. It is really fast with the 5-speed.
Accord and V are both great. Forthcoming Accord may get the current Acura TL base engine (dealer scuttlebutt). If so, I will tip my hat to Nissan for forcing Honda to crank the HP up to compete.
http://www.mag-x.com/scoop/accordwagon0110/00.jpg
Pulling onto the highway, I could feel it asking me to crank it, but I showed restraint. Noise and wear are the 2 reasons (beyond gas mileage) I would worry, but I can assure you it did not get noisy until I hit 80mph (even then it was mainly from a howling wind). It is very quiet at 70mph. Honda loves high rev engines, and I have read nothing about wear problems in these powerplants. The auto will be easier to resell, but it lacks the soul of the 5 speed.
$32,200. CAN + Transport + PDI is a lot of money for a 4 Cyl CR-V. Before you make the move you should test drive the AWD Santa Fe GLS with shiftronic. If after that you still prefer the CR-V that's fine, just remember to test drive the competition BEFORE you buy!
As for our trip down south, I am leaning towards the CR-V for the family space. It may be a moot point anyhow as I do not think I will have enough miles on the Accord for proper break-in before taking an 18 hour highway driving trip with it.
I would only do these if I had cash to or ability to pay off should You move or rates go too high.
I do like paying 100% of price to dealer and getting "clear title" but be careful not to get in over your head. With a 60month zero down financing for about 5.7% anywhere. Which option makes you feel better with 6 months into ownership and $5,000 wreck.
INKY
INKY
The "go to message" feature should work - the only problem is that it doesn't take you to the right number. You will notice that the numbers appearing next to the post, 5583 in this case, don't agree with the "actual" number registered for the post. Pass your mouse cursor over the message number to this post and you will see the URL in your browser shows 5788 instead.
When posts get removed, for whatever reason, the software counter doesn't correctly synchronize the numbers.
tidester
Host
SUVs
Ticktock - I agree. When you consider what our friends in Canada pay in taxes, you'll give them a break on car prices.
Ckirk4 - The CR-V behaves very well in the snow. For the few times that you'll need it, the CR-V is more than adequate. Just drive it like any other FWD car. When you need the extra push, it'll be there.
[I remember them well, mind you.]
Steve
Host
SUVs, Vans and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
2002 CRV EX 5 speed MSRP + destination (ignore roof in states)
Cdn$: 28700 + 850 = 29550 = $18321 US @ .62
US$: 21500 + 440 = $21940 US
Even after tacking on 15% tax here in Ontario, that puts it at $21070 US. It is really more a tease to those South of the Border than a help to us. This is why US dealers are calling gray market cars from Mexico and Canada a real problem.
http://www.media.subaru.com/
This SUV has no distinguishable look from the
curent CR-V. It looks like a CR-V on steroid. What
were the North America R&D department think of
when they hatched this idea. Were they smoking too
much pots? And the headquater in Japan must be
spending too much time on the golf course to approve this design. I am a royal Honda customers but I just can't believe this crap they come up with. I thought Honda finally gets it when the
2001 Civic and MD-X came out. They look different
and distinguish. I have to admit as much as I
hated the Jeep Grand Cherokee or disliked the
Lexus RX-300, they look *different*. So what is
the added value of this giant piece of metal ball?
Seats 8 ? A stretch GM SUV Limo can seat more
than that. I would rather buy a MD-X then this
Peelot.
Kenitosan - Wait until you see one in person. Other than the obvious headlights, there really aren't many similarities.
Thanks for the Soob link. I like the details, but the overall shape doesn't win any awards. The taillights are nice and it looks like they have a lift-glass like the CR-V. Good idea.
If you are planning to buy a new 2002 CR-V, I suggest you send e-mail to all Honda dealers around your are. Make an offer and the car you want. This really works, I got mine at $1200 below msrp and i did not ask for any options.
I got my car within 3 weeks...Yesssssssss
Try it!!! There's no hassle and negotiation involved.
Have Fun!!!!!!!!!!!!!
can you really put 2 Mtn Bikes in the
back w/o taking off the front tires as the
CRV brochure shows?