Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I agree that leather is hot in the summer but the tan leather seats don't seem to keep the heat as much as the grey.
The Suburban & Yukon XL are larger than the Expedition. The difference in space is behind the third row seat.
We rented an Expedition for a week and then tried out a Suburban. Expedition is a nice vehicle but I feel it failed to compare to the Suburban.
Thanks.
Cabelas.com
It has heated seats, sunroof, running boards, but there were a few thinks like autoride, etc. that I really don't know whether I have them or not.
This is our first Suburban [we love it so far], so I am not sure how to find out this info (no original sticker came with the car).
Thanks.
You can also go to any dealer and using you VIN they can print out all the options/base equipment
Has anybody experienced a noise in a Suburban/Tahoe coming from the front dash, while the vehicle is being driven and when the a/c is on? Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Covers everything that was original equipment, same as factory warranty, even DVD player, XM, etc.
Company is DirectServiceContracts.com; has been around since 1978 and actual company is Lindner or Lindsay or something like that. They said that the dealer direct bills to the insurance company and that I don't pay a dime (except deductible if I go that route).
1. Does anyone know this company?
2. Is this a good price?
Thanks!!!!!
1. Brakes really took more foot pressure from me to get the breaking action right compared to my Yukon. Is this normal?
2. I drove in 2WD only but I noticed a rumble up front and it felt like the tires were out of balance. Is this normal for 4WD?
3. The ride was generally louder. I guess the tires are the reason for this.
4. I think I will test a 4WD Yukon XL or Suburban 4WD and see what the differences may be.
I also test drove the Denali and like the way it drives and feels with AWD but don't like the way GM put painted bumpers on a $51K vehicle.
I want to make sure if I switch I don't find a lemon. My Yukon has been superb, but with 0% interest I could switch and not see a difference on my payments.
Thanks,
I do have to say that I think the ride is rougher and firmer. You might like firmer, if you think that your Burb floats too much. If you like the floatiness, you won't like firmer.
The tires are fairly knobby, compared to all-seasons put on a lot of Burbs. This also contributes to the ride/noise, IMO.
I love the truck, but you have to decide which ride you want and what look you want. I wouldn't change it, but I wouldn't mind a little cushier ride and will probably consider a quieter tire when I replace the stock tires.
Jim
Z71 - No problem. Rather paint steel than Plastic. I like the Z71. Test drove another on Tuesday. Had it most of the day. Totally impressive. Did hear the NOISE in the AC and it is an Ear Sore. The Radio kills it though. I asked the dealer if he would lower the cost an extra 10K because the Truck was made in Mexico. I told him when I buy it will be an Arlington, TX Truck or I won't buy.
Had my 01 Yukon XL inspected today. IT FAILED because of the Parking Brake! The inspection technician says 95% of all 1 and 2 year old Burbs, Yukons, Chevy - GMC Pickups fail this test. Says there will be a RECALL.
ADVICE GET IT CHECKED OUT BEFORE 36K miles or you will spend over $300 in repairs. There is something set wrong and it winds up wearing the back breaks out prematurely.
PROBLEM 2 - Wear on the inside of the Front Tire Treads. Tech said another trademark of GMC and Chevy Trucks. He says that the Trucks Front ends are lowered down for shipping and not re-established back to correct height at the Dealer. Says this wears the inside tire tread prematurely. I checked several at the GMC Dealer and they were all wearing funny.
Anyway my dealer is going to take care of the Brake problem and was trying to sluff off on the Tires, but I told him the tires are not a deal breaker for me and I will buy another 04 GMC soon, but I told him that I have fought with this abnormal wear for a long time and rotation and Front end alignment did nothing. So I said if you know something I don't lets work a deal and give me a break on tire cost and alignment and lets get the problem fixed or adjusted.
So we're dealin.' Its always better to work with your dealer. GMC or GM would be a nightmare. Heck after all I am still under Warranty PLUS have a 100K GM Protection Plan.
Did they say how to fix this? Also, is there a way to look at the front end (besides the tires) to tell whether or not the front end was put back to normal?
Thanks.
Other than tire pressure, I am not sure how the manufacturer could lower the vehicle for shipping purposes.
When some of the foreign cars are unloaded out of the port, they are packaged on roller skids and usually do not have any wheels on them.
I had the park brake fixed under warranty as well just before my 3-year warranty was up. I did not & still do not have any problems w/ tire wear on my 01 YXL 4wd.
The OEM Tombstones are still wearing great. In spite of all the bad press & problems I have heard about, the Firestones are by far the best wearing tires I have ever owned. Treadwear is even across the thread, & I have experienced good traction in snow, even here in the North East. Haven't gotten stuck yet, & rarely have even spun a tire. I must have been lucky.
I probably will go w/ Michelin X-terrain's next time, only because I have heard & read all good things about them. Just my 2 cents. Dave
Anyway I passed the inspection for the rear parking break issue and the 36K Warranty covered the problem. They turned the rotors and replaced the rear break pads.
About the tires all I can say is get it aligned within within the first couple thousand miles. The dealer said they don't normally re-align after 7500 miles.
Now if I can just sell this 01 I will either buy the Z71 or Yukon XL 4WD.
Here's my Truck:
http://www.cars.com/search/used/cc/standard/results/single/ld/det- ail.jhtml?paId=134388120&aff=national&src=&cid=null
I saw a bunch of new Beetles get loaded on a ship in Veracruz in '00 and they were all driven on. I have no idea if they were going to Miami or Galveston or further.
Steve, Host
When I got the new Suburban, the specs on the door jam call for 30 psi in each tire. This is for the 17" wheels.
After I got home and checked, 2 of the tires only had about 25 psi in them and the other 2 were below 30 as well.
I guess it could have been from the vehicle sitting but I am disappointed that the dealer did not check them before delivering the vehicle.
I know that Toyota & Lexus vehicles delivered into port in north Jersey & Philadelphia do not have wheels on them. (Perhaps certain models do)
Thanks,
Dave
why?
1. Pushrod engines - Instead of improving efficiency and gas mileage, they lower both of them because of their lack of overhead cams, Variable Valve Timing and/or Variable Induction System. plus they are too harsh and accelerate slowly
2. Poor crash tests - Silverado, which is based on Suburban or the other way around, got only a MARGINAL in crash tests scores
3. Lack of airbags and safety features - ONLY side airbags are available, nope..no side curtains here! also the Traction Control System and Stability Management System isn't as advanced as the Japanese
4. Poor build quality - why are u paying 50K for a Suburban with fake wood inside?? call it Escalade!..not worth it, believe me..ive had experience..also, the GM "parts bin" gives the same materials and plastics from the low-quality Suburban/Tahoe to the Escalade/Denali..NOT WORTH IT!
So why buy Japanese?
1. New Infiniti QX56 - the size of an Escalade with a sexier interior with the latest in safety, technological, and mechanical features..better gas mileage too..better overall resale value and much higher-quality at a couple-of-thousand dollars less
2. Toyota Sequoia - higher quality and STILL BUILT IN US..wow! was it a miracle or what? more safety features too
3. Nissan Pathfinder Armada - new and capable of everything
**remember this: even the 2004 Lincoln Navigator has more sophistication in it! It just needs a more powerful engine..
"Suzuki thinks it has identified a group of buyers who want what the company calls "affordable luxury." Those are buyers who like nice things, but who are willing to pay only so much to get them. They want a maximum return on a minimum investment. Their ego needs are satisfied by buying the car that comes closest to complying with that formula."
Carmakers Embrace Niche Marketing (Washington Post)
If you read the article, you'll see that GM has made their own (monetary) contributions to Suzuki.
Steve, Host
I answered the "gentleman" above only because I am irritated at simple-minded anti-push-rod, anti-American-car-makers, anti-brand-name, anti-thinking thinking. The errors in logic are too numerous to mention, but a great example is saying that crash tests which show how well the frame and body protects the occupants can be extrapolated from a pickup body to an SUV body on the same frame. He might as well walk around in circles with a sign reading "Down with <hated-company/ethnic group/country/whatever>!" or put one of those window decals on his vehicle showing that ornery-looking little jerk with the stream issuing forth onto the "enemy" brand.
I do agree that new technology isn't necessarily better just because it's new.
But GM has to stay on its toes because a lot of the "junk" car companies have gotten a lot better. CR has praised a Hyundai model and our editors recently gave the Sorento a most wanted award for '04.
Suburbans always made great canoeing rigs (my personal test, lol). They can carry 5 paddlers with all their gear inside comfortably for a long ride to the put-in (with 3+ canoes on top) and you can cram 9 in for the shuttle without much effort. They were sure popular in Alaska when I lived up there.
Steve, Host
And I will (must) continue to admire from afar. The Yukon XL is as close to a luxury vehicle as I've ever gotten -- maybe as I'll ever get until the kids are through college. Given that they are almost-five and two-and-a-half, and that I am 49; then that may have to be a "luxury" ambulance or something equipped with life-support paraphernalia. ;-)
My luxury ride is an '97 Outback Ltd. w/ leather seats that I got back in April :-).
Steve, Host
GM also makes hearses, I'm sure; some possibly based on Suburban/Yukon XLs (lame effort to stay on topic and mollify those here who are incensed at any humanity, comradery or other "useless" chitchat).
tidester, host
im not hating domestics..i love Caddys and some new Chevys <Equinox, Colorodo>..but the Suburban/Yukon arent that great.
p.s. are u pinoy?
Obviously, you can see that I am not a car-purchasing "nut" nor an aficionado. I've suffered my share of fools and have spent a great deal of my life being one. Sometimes, I've leapt to conclusions about things (such as domestics) only to find out that things had changed and I was wrong. This is why I bought the F150; I could find little if anything major in the way of complaints about it, either here in Edmunds or elsewhere. It is a very nice ride, in fact; more comfortable and, yes, more luxurious than anything I had owned previously.
Before buying the F150, I had been carefully planning to get an Odyssey, firmly sold on the superiority of the Japanese makers -- Honda and Toyota at the top. However, the problem and repair history of Odysseys (and Siennas, for that matter) has seemed to contradict that assumption. They aren't awful, but they fall short of the hype and on level ground with Ford and GM products, I think.
We were shopping for 8 seats minimum (my wife is the Pinoy and family is visiting next year) and so we were considering the Honda Pilot, the new Toyota Sienna LE8 and the Yukon XL (Suburban, if forced to do so -- I don't like their grill nearly as much). The Pilot would be people OR luggage (unless willing to deal with the windage of a massive box on the roof), Siennas are so far unavailable for viewing, and the year-end deals on 2003 Yukons tempted us enough to succumb.
Now maybe I'll regret this purchase; time will tell. But the facts I could uncover did not give any huge negative about these vehicles. Owners comments (and repurchase statistics) reveal far more owners happy enough to buy another one than those feeling stung by the experience. In the end, you puts down your money and you takes your chances.
My objection to your comments was that you are simply "against" something and not very constructively. Maybe you didn't intend that tone; it is easier to write unintentional negative tones than to clearly present a plus/minus case for a point of view. But you clearly said "Don't buy!" What possible purpose do you have in posting that? It just doesn't seem very helpful to anyone (are you trying to save people from themselves really? Or are you trying to feel better about your own decision?).
Interestingly, my Dad (who has never owned any foreign-branded vehicle except for his one indiscression with a mid-sixties VW Beetle), is shying away from buying another Cadillac because he is so unimpressed with their reliability history when compared to Lexus, Accura and the like....
Second, my 02 LT 4WD has the factory fender flares. I was thinking of putting the molded Husky splash guards on it and wanted to know if anyone has done this? How hard was it and do you like them?
Thanks for all the great info and conversations.
Since you seems to know so much about everything, including engine, I'm surprised that you don't know that torque, not horsepower is what a heavy truk/Suv need to tow and that overhead cams and 4 valves per cylinder give you more rpm's (and consequently horsepower) but less torque, especially at low rpm's than the old single cam, 2 valves per cylinder engine.
You see, I bought my YukonXL 2500 with the 8.1 liter to TOW my race cars and trailer(12000 lbs), not to be fashionable or to have a "cute" SUV like your's.