Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

Acura MDX (pre-2007)

13435373940125

Comments

  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    Sure, you may provide the link to the car seat discussion if you wish.

    Actually, the side impact crash test does include ratings for the rear passengers as well. The MDX is untested as of yet, but because of the elevated seating position, it should also get at least 4 stars (more likely 5 stars) in the NHTSA's side impact crash test. Keep in mind though, that the NHTSA uses a 3500lbs car height ram. The results in a real world situation may be different if one is involved in a collision with another SUV/light truck or a minivan.

    SUVs are not necessarily stronger. Thorax side impact airbags are far more important and only now are many manufacturers starting to offer them, let alone head curtain airbags. As of now, the only SUV on the market that has standard equipment side impact airbags for all outboard passengers front and rear is the MB M-class. For MY2002, it is extremely likely that the head protection curtains will be standard equipment as well (partly because there is not much else to add except foot airbags, which the '03 E-class/S-class will apparently get). BMW offers rear side impact airbags only as an option ($625, I think); they're not activated from the factory though. Acura may choose to offer head curtain or rear side impact airbags in future MDXs (along with a stability control system), but look for them to appear in their flagship 3.5RL sedan first before trickling down to other lower end Acura models.

    I suspect your 6'1" friend probably sat in the right side 3rd row seat with the 2nd row pushed forward. A 5'9", I had trouble getting the 2nd row 40% section of the seat to move tilt back to its original position. Moving it all of the way back would have been impossible since I would have had insufficient legroom. For short trips (5-10 minutes), a shorter (flexible) adult should be able to tolerate it. I wouldn't recommend that a taller adult sit back there since his/her head would be close to the tailgate glass and that could be a safety issue in a rear end collision. The MDX's rear head restraints aren't exactly the best out there.


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • lhrandlhrand Member Posts: 24
    Here's the link for wmquan: http://boards2.parentsplace.com/messages/get/ppcarseats210.html

    Also one more thought: If you don't already have the Roundabout, some places will let you take it out in the parking lot to try the fit in your car before buying it. Babies-R-Us is like this (from what I have heard). Also I think most places are pretty liberal about returns for fit issues.


    Drew, thanks for your feedback. I had been misinformed about the side crash data. Knowing that the MB will have both thorax and curtain bags makes the decision to get the MDX tougher. Especially since there is just such an aura of safety about Mercedeses generally, and the ML320 does have a stability control system too, doesn't it? But it seems to be taller and heavier than the MDX, which I would think would count against it, at least as far as chances of rolling are concerned, not that that is my most-feared type of crash.


    I'm not sure what the seating configuration was like when our friend sat in the 3rd row, but I do think he was on the right, so you are probably correct. It was hard to get much of an appreciation of things because the MDX was literally crawling with lookers. One more question: does the proximity of the back glass make the third row a dangerous place to locate a child in a car seat? I wouldn't put one there routinely, but the whole point of getting a 7-seater is for flexibility, so might want to do it from time to time.

  • kenyeekenyee Member Posts: 738
    The Sequioa has curtain air bags...not sure about rear side bags though. It also has ESP (though the ASR seems to be more aggressive than the ML's or X5's).
  • mary72mary72 Member Posts: 6
    Last Friday it was raining in San Antonio. I was
    driving North/South and going through an intersection about 30 miles an hour. A Ford escort going East/West slid through her red light also going about 30 mph. She hit me so HARD!
    I was sure my car was ruined and I pulled over
    in a parking lot. Her car had a terribly smashed
    left headlight, bumper dragging on the ground and
    a very battered left fender. I walked around to
    inspect my car and I couldn't find where she had
    hit me. I thought I had lost my mind. Finally
    I noticed the right front wheel which had obviously taken all the impact. Even so, all I
    could see were scratches all over the wheel (no
    real dents) and there was some of her car's paint
    on the fender in front of the wheel ( also not
    dented). No one could believe her car looked the
    way it did and my car was so damage free. Let
    me emphasize, she did hit me very hard. I will
    be taking it this week for a damage estimate but
    I think I was really lucky and the MDX is a
    wonderful car.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    I'm sooo glad you are ok! If the front wheel/axle took most of the impact (and from your description, it was perpendicular to the wheel), I'd be very leery of alignment problems. This is true for ANY vehicle, especially one that uses a unitized frame structure.

    Bottom line is take to the best body shop you can find and let your insurance company short change you. Good luck.
  • mary72mary72 Member Posts: 6
    Thanks for the information. I will be taking it
    to the collision center which is owned by my
    Acura dealer and it has a good reputation. First
    I have to run it through one of those State Farm
    drive-through claim centers where they will give
    me an estimate and a check. The State Farm agent
    assured me that if the body shop found anything
    else that there would be no problem. You can bet
    that I will tell them( Gunn Acura)to please find any hidden damage that the insurance company that
    is paying doesn't want to find.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    I read my last message, meant to say "don't let your insurance company short change you"

    Couldn't edit the message in time. Anyway....
  • cotmccotmc Member Posts: 1,081
    Funny! For awhile I was wondering if you were the VP of Operations for the Texas district of State Farm! ;-)
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    An exec at an insurance company? A may have my faults, but I'm not that bad ;-)


    Insurance rates here in NY are definitely no picnic. image
  • cotmccotmc Member Posts: 1,081
    Having owned our MDX since early October, my overall opinion is that I am quite pleased with it, even though it has had some minor bugs (ticking noise in glovebox area, side mirror areas retaining water, etc). There is now a recall on some of the originally manufactured MDXs concerning the seat belt wiring harness, and my MDX is included in that recall effort. Hence, if you can wait for a 2002 model, you will likely find most of these types of bugs eliminated, although that is by no means a certainty.

    I don't follow minivan discussions, but I understand that the Odyssey within its third year of production still doesn't have stellar reliability. I am optimistically expecting that the MDX, marketed under the premium Acura label, will have additional quality controls beyond the Odyssey and its higher production numbers. Based on feedback I've seen here and in acuramdx.org, I am guessing the reliability of the major functions of the MDX has been very good, thus far.

    In my point of view, my wife and I could have waited for a 2002 model. Much of our decision to buy now was because we wanted the cargo space now, rather than wait another year to replace our mid-sized sedan. It came in very handy on our recent trip to Texas. We could carry much more baggage (which seems to multiply now that we have started our own family!) than we previously could pack into our sedan. The MDX was the first SUV that we really liked. The ML320 was the only other strong candidate, but it seemed to be quite a bit slower and ride just a little bit harsher. (At the time, the RX300 was not discounted much at all. At today's discounted prices, we would definitely give it a 2nd look.) But now that we have the MDX, we really enjoy driving it. It's very responsive and rides very nicely for such a large vehicle. Yes, it has its "bugs" that we eventually need to have corrected, but we are both very happy to have purchased it when we did.

    If you have a vehicle which still meets your requirements for the time being, then you might be wise to wait for the 2002 model. However, I personally doubt it will have curtain air bags. It seems that the Japanese brands lag behind the Germans (and even some American models) when it comes to airbag technology. However, I wouldn't be too surprised to see the 2002 MDX possibly have electronic stability control or HID headlights. (But I wouldn't count on either one for 2002 until you see that in print!)

    Another consideration is that the base price of the MDX may increase for 2002. One theory I have is that the Base MDX will include additional features next year, such as a power passenger seat. Some people have stated that $2600 seems to be too big of a price jump for the Touring Package. It would not suprise me if Acura reduces that price differential -- by increasing the price on the Base model!
  • cotmccotmc Member Posts: 1,081
    Regarding the 3rd row seat, I will have no reservations about putting our 2-year old son and his childseat back there when we have relatives visiting us. Just like yourself, we don't typically have anybody using the 3rd row seat. However, there is definitely some room between the seat cushion and the rear hatch. I don't see any problem with a childseat in the 3rd row seat. We would definitely use the passenger (right) side of the 3rd row seat, because it is difficult to get access to the driver side of the 3rd row.

    I suspect your salesman was saying 14-years and younger as a general guideline. In my opinion, he should have made that point more clear. I don't think there is any weight concern, and there is definitely NO age limit. However, there is only a small amount of legroom. I guess your salesman has a rule-of-thumb: most people over 14 years old would not fit very well in the 3rd row. On the other hand, Ann Job, auto critic for carpoint, said she fit back in the 3rd row seat just fine for a 30-minute drive across town. I don't remember, but I'm pretty sure she is shorter than 6 feet tall! ;-)

    I'm not sure about Drew's comment regarding the rear headrests? He seems to say that an adult's head might hit the rear hatch glass?? I agree that the headrests for that row are not the best looking, nor are they very thickly padded, but they are adjustable. They can be adjusted up to stop an adult's head from snapping backward. With the headrests adjusted up, I see no reason why an adult's head would be in danger of hitting against the glass. But then again, I see no reason why any tall adult would be willing to sit back there for more than 5 minutes!
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    Thank you very much for your thoughtfulness in posting the link to parentsplace.com. I began visiting them, and have also contributed my infant seat data to Toby MacAdam's carseat compatibility database -- what a great idea!

    I've gone ahead and bought the Roundabout, though I'm still mulling over the installation. As you pointed out, Babies'R'Us is very good about return policies if you can't get it to fit. They told us that we could return the infant seat with original packaging if it didn't fit (they can help bring it out to the lot but they're often so busy with customers that they're only glad to have you try it on your own and return it if it doesn't fit!). Not to mention that we had one of their 20%-off-a-single-item coupons that expired this weekend; no one else seems to be able to get away with discounts on Britax.

    My main concern has been rear-facing installation, as a number of folks have had problems with the Roundabout in that orientation. Seems like the seat needs the unique rear-tether for proper rear-facing installation. Unfortunately, most vehicles don't come with tether anchors for the front seats (logically enough, since one shouldn't put a childseat in the front, regardless of whether or not the airbag can be disabled).

    I'll post my results when I try it; I just want to call Britax one more time about their new version of the Roundabout, the Advantage. Unfortunately it seems to be very slow to be getting through the retail channel so we'll probably stick with the Roundabout.

    My other fear is whether or not our rather sizeable five-month old will outgrow the Britax before 12 months and the forward-facing point! And unfortunately the only car seats I know of that go past 30 pounds rear-facing are the Cosco ones which I'm somewhat leery of.
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    I am confident in the MDX's safety. Even though it hasn't been crash-tested yet, I have no reasons to doubt Acura's claims for anticipated 5-star (NHTSA) and "good" (highest IIHS ratings) front-impact scores.

    However, if you're someone who is very conscientious about safety and want every last measure possible, I would recommend you take a long, hard look at the 2002 MB ML320. I highly doubt if Acura will introduce either thoraxic rear seat side airbags or side curtains for 2002, though I could be wrong. Acura, and many other Japanese manufacturers, traditionally lag behind, as cotmc mentioned.

    I agree with Drew that thoraxic side airbags (protecting the chest area) are more important in an SUV than side curtains because of the higher riding position of passengers. However, having side curtains are certainly a positive too.

    When we made our purchase decision, with the timing based on our baby's arrival, the 2000 ML320 was notably deficient in some child safety areas -- the U.S. ones lacked child seat tether anchors (you could use parts of the seat frame or cargo hooks), and I think all of them lacked childproof door locks. However, U.S. law mandated the former into the 2001 model, and the latter is now available for installation by an MB dealer, at an extra cost ($100-$125?).

    We also found the ML320's ride uncomfortable but that's a highly subjective item -- some folks find a vehicle very smooth, others find it jarring. I (personal opinion) also suspect that the ML320 is possibly less inherently stable than the MDX but with the use of stability control, it ultimately exceeds the MDX in some but not all conditions. This of course is highly debatable and the rougher ride can make it seem less stable than it actually is.

    There's more room in the ML320's third row, especially if you slide the second row forward. There's slightly more room behind the MDX's third row, and also the second row (in terms of useable space). Please note that in either vehicle, placing children in the third row puts them closer to the rear impact zone and is not as safe as the second row. For folks who may be concerned about frequently putting children in the third row, a full-sized SUV may be in order.

    If we had our baby this October instead of last September, our decision to buy an MDX over an ML320 might be different. I think I'd probably lean toward the ML320 _if_ the anticipated features come in and if the MDX did not show significant improvement. However, I have a feeling my wife would still prefer the MDX as she thinks its safety is fine, and she really disliked what she described as the swaying sensations she got in the ML320 (some folks exaggerate this to say the vehicle rocks all the time, but that's not the case; it's a truck and will have some different characteristics than a car-based SUV).
  • mattrichtermattrichter Member Posts: 19
    Hi all,

    I just called Acura of Los Gatos (I've had a deposit there since Jan 5th) and asked them to cut a check for my deposit. Actually, the salesman there was very helpful, but he said he couldn't do anything for me. I told him that I wanted an MDX, as did my wife, but when we're talking $2k over MSRP for the MDX, vs $100 over invoice for a 2002 Explorer (totally optioned Eddie Bauer for $33k), I can't justify the $6.5k price difference. As previously mentioned in the discussions, the $2k premium is starting to make the M320 and option, the RX300 are discounted, and the Nissan Patherfinder (Nice, but small) is so cheap right now as well. I also informed he dealer about the lower cost, shorter time dealers out of the area, as well as some in the area (but if it's MSRP, the wait is longer).

    I also pointed out that his dealership isn't doing themselves any favors by gouging the customers. If I had bought at MSRP + $2k, they NEVER would have seeen any money from me for parts or service. They only way they'd see me is for warrenty repairs! The salesman was sympethetic, but his hands are tied.

    I hope that everyone tells the dealers that the premium prices are un-acceptible. I think that Los Gatos may be a little insulated to the compitition, cause where they are if someone wants somethign, they just pay watever it takes.

    I must say that I'm rather dissapointed with the Acura dealers network (in general, but there are examples that are the exception to the rule). While I like the cars, I can't say that I like to corporate attitude toward happy customers. These premiums really start the relationship on a sour note.

    I'm in the bay area in CA. Other than the dealer in Tuscon, does anyone know of other dealers that are more fair? I also have seen posts of people going toCanada to buy, and getting the exchange rate bonus as well. I haven't given up completely, but I'll be dammed if I'll pay over MSRP when the economy is slowing and there are discountes everywhere else.

    Matt
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    William
    Sorry I missed your question a while back about the Britax Roundabout. My now 2 ½ year old has been in the Britax since he outgrew the Century infant carrier we used – at about 5-6 months. The Roundabout in the rear facing position definitely needs the tether to become ‘immovable’. But, with the tether in our Odyssey and MDX, the seat simply cannot be beat IMO. We have a great local kid’s store that has periodic demonstrations of each of the seats. The Britax easily bested the others, but with the significant price penalty you alluded to. The Evenflo(sp??) Horizon was a distant second from the demonstrations I have seen, but at almost a third of the Roundabout price. Move the Roundabout, and the entire 80-100 pound display moves with it. Admittedly, I was a little ‘frugal’ and did not want the price penalty for 2 Roundabout’s and got the Horizon for the infrequent times he rides with me. A moment of weakness – should have gotten the second Roundabout, not that the Horizon is terrible, but . . .

    To effectively use the rear-facing tether, you need to get a tether anchor – a 6” nylon strap with metal square ‘eyelets’ on each end – which Britax sells. Using this anchor, you loop the nylon strap around a support brace underneath the seat, both the Odyssey and MDX have a good tubular steel support bracket running the width of the seat. The tether clip attaches to the ‘eyelets’. Once tightened, the seat will not move if installed correctly. Also, the tether helps give a better than expected angled seat so that the youngster can fall asleep on the errands around town.

    As for fit. Rear and front facing, the Roundabout fits the Odyssey and MDX very well with good seat angles for those on-the-road-naps while upright enough for good visibility. The adjustable seat backs are a definite help.

    Finally, the growth curve really flattens out after month 8, so I would expect that you should be fine through month 12 with the Britax. If not, I guess we’ll be seeing you on a talk show with the 200 pound 2 year old ;-)
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    I would not hesitate for a single moment to put my son in the 3rd row, or myself for that matter. Acura claims that the 3rd row seat integrity is not breached even with a 30mph impact from behind. I have read this several times, but cannot find you a link at this moment. Side impact wise, the Odyssey had better scores than some competitors had WITH side air bags, so I am very confident the MDX will be stellar also. But, the more the better – the curtains would be nice. The 2002 Explorer will have them, but not for approximately a year. Ford is being very tricky with it’s press releases toting this and several other features such as VSC while not always providing the disclaimer about exactly when a customer can order these upgrades. The bigger question is why not offer them from the start. I fear because they don’t have the bugs worked out yet.

    I agree that the MB M-class is rock solid if your biggest consideration is safety, but IMO, the MDX gives up very little to the MB in this area while gaining in almost every other category except off-road prowess.
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    There has been much speculation on what the 2002 MDX will offer above and beyond the 2001. I submit – NOTHING. I use the Odyssey as the best comparison. Both only have 2 trim levels for manufacturing ease – essentially no factory installed options, both are run on the same line in Canada, both will follow the same upgrade pattern. The only thing added to the Odyssey for the 2nd model year was more colors and the navigation system option. I believe the navigation system was added for only 2 reasons – (1) to work out the installation bugs on the manufacturing floor before the MDX was rolled out and (2) to allow for easier MDX prototype builds since Honda builds it’s prototypes right on the production line.

    Unless there is a gross oversight, and I don’t see one, the MDX will be unchanged for 2002 except for maybe IOSFIX/LATCH government mandates and additional colors. But, as has been stated, the price may go up, although the Odyssey did not even with the 6-9 month waits after year 1. IMO, the price will remain the same as competition heats up from the VW Colorado and Porsche Cayenne.

    No, I don’t have any inside info – just more speculation. Although, the logic and prior Honda pattern are there.
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    Matt, post #1819 -

    Try Cerritos Acura in central Los Angeles - my sister got her Touring MDX there at MSRP and no unwanted options. They're a very high-volume dealership so they get as many MDXs or more than other dealers.

    Yes, they always install mudguards & wheel locks, but she would have ordered those anyway. Deal was done via email and fax and she drove off in less than 90 minutes; extremely happy with whole experience.

    I suggest that you only contact the Internet Sales Manager:

    Mitch Franklin
    Internet Sales Manager
    562/355-0000
    www.browningautogroup.com

    Please mention that Jeff M. sent you 'cause I'm building some good will towards a Acura TL-S purchase later this year - and they're going over MSRP most places as well.

    Good luck.
  • janb5janb5 Member Posts: 1
    I live in the Chicago area, own a Lexus ES300, and recently test-drove the MDX at Pauly Acura. At that time (about 2 weeks ago)we were told the wait was August-September. I'm beginning to wonder if it might not be smarter to wait for the 2002. Does anyone know when Acura introduces its new models? Would there likely be another long wait as soon as the 2002's are introduced, or do you think they can ramp up production? I'm avidly reading all the predictions about new features -- would be happy with power passenger seat and no water dripping from driver side mirror.

    Anyway, I'd appreciate any and all opinions about buying now versus waiting, and any thoughts on Chicago Acura dealers. The Pauly folks are selling at MSRP, which seems fair given the demand.
  • msu79gt82msu79gt82 Member Posts: 541
    What data source are you using to say that TL-Ss are going for over MSRP? The 2002 Acura TL-S forum over in Sedans has been very quite with little or no interest up until about a week ago. The TL-S is not due to arrive at the dealerships until March 15th. The Acura dealership I use in Houston only had 4 advance orders as of the end of last week. Indeed they have 23 coming in in two weeks after the 15th. I and many others are speculating that Acura will be unable to command MSRP, at least not in Houston. I would be very interested in your source.
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    Good for you – cut that dealership loose and fire a few burning arrows while your at it. If your up to it, call Acura Customer Service and levy an official complaint against the dealership. This is one of the best ways to highlight a bad dealership besides taking the time to write a formal letter. Complaints go directly to a dealers rating and that’s why the Acura dealers are so pushy about new customers filling out the satisfaction surveys. Acura CS won’t do much other than log the complaint, but it will affect the dealers rating, as it should. Maybe Acura CS would be willing to guide you to a more ‘representative’ dealership. I would insist upon it, but make sure you talk to the Customer Service Regional Rep. for your area.
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    2 to 3 weeks for the Nav unit fix is too long. It's not like these are only used on the MDX. The entire Acura line except for the Integra have this option. As stated above, call Acura CS making sure to get your Regional Rep. and complain - LOUD. Having a Nav unit that is DOA should be Acura's 1st concern to keep a happy customer - make sure it is!!!!

    Acura CS # 1.800.382.2238
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    Also, your dealership should get a piece of the blame. Yes, Acura may have the parts backordered, but why did the vehicle prep guys not catch this problem. I know the Nav unit is part of the prep checklist. They should have, and I seriously doubt they would allow Acura to make them sit on a deliverable MDX for 3 weeks waiting for DOA replacement parts.

    The dealership should take a much bigger interest in resolving this in a matter of days as they are to blame also.

    For all MDX owners out there - when you have a problem that is not being resolved to your satisfaction, speak up while remaining respectful and more times than not your situation will improve. And if it does not, that is Acura Customer Services job - keeping the customer base happy and working through these very issues.

    DC
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    Thank you very much for the feedback on the Britax Roundabout. It does seem to be a terrific seat. There were concerns about it after Consumer Reports didn't rate it highly but most people seem to feel that CR didn't test it realistically.

    I was concerned about what extra equipment I'd need to install the Roundabout with. I think Britax must have gotten a lot of complaints because it seems they've wised up and now include the key components with the seat itself! E.g. besides the 5-foot long tether strap, it also includes that heavy nylon strap with the D-ring to attach it to (it loops into itself, around a support, and provides the ring to attach the tether hook to). I think it used to be sold separately.

    Yes, you're right that my son will eventually taper off in his growth rate. Though the idea of him being a professional basketball or baseball player is a rather pleasant one (so long as he takes care of his parents ...).

    FWIW, Britax claims to hold some of the U.S. patents on ISOFIX, but gave up their rights to them for "the greater good" of safety. I'm always a bit suspicious of manufacturers patting themselves on the back, but the quality of their seat seems to back up the self-promotion.

    P.S. Britax is planning to release the "Super Elite" model this year. It will hold a child in a 5-point harness from 1 year to 8 years, or 20 to 80 pounds, without going to a conventional booster seat! Upside is that it'll fit the larger toddlers and let them stay in a harness for a longer period of time. Downside is that it'll probably be frightfully expensive, and some children may resist being in a 5-point harness for that long a time.
  • dfc101adfc101a Member Posts: 35
    I did have to purchase the D-ring nylon strap seperately - much better description than my attempt. Looks like they did wise up.

    On Consumer Reports - I am a big fan, but the tesing was skewed. No tether was used although the tether was used on other seats if I remember correctly. In addition, no testing was done on side impacts where the Roundabout excels versus the competition. Straight ahead testing only. The orange seat belt 'locks' really prevent side to side motion, and no other seat I have researched has them. Also, the foam side padding for the head is a hard plastic in the other makes. IMO, the Roundabout with the tether would have outclassed the rest in the CR test, and they really need to test side impacts.
  • lhrandlhrand Member Posts: 24
    On the MDX vs. the ML320 - I agree that the MDX is a more pleasant ride. I don't remember it feeling rough/bumpy, though -- actually what I noticed more of a mushy feeling in the handling. My MDX test-drive came right after a disappointing test of a Volvo wagon, so I suppose I could be remembering it as better than it was just because I was so happy to get out of that Volvo. Didn't drive the ML320 for a couple weeks after that. Got the feeling I *could* drive the ML320 without discomfort, but would rather spend my driving hours in the MDX, which felt snappy and zippy and not at all like a big heavy vehicle. The ML320 did, however, have a really impressive turning radius for an SUV (we thought). Didn't try that in the MDX.

    Right there with you on the increase in luggage with the first child! We were chagrined to find ourselves renting our first Smarte-Carte the last time we traveled by air.

    Our car situation is, indeed, OK for the time being -- I drive a 1992 Nissan Stanza that never gives me a minute of trouble -- so we may wait for the '02 MDX. Will have to crunch some numbers and look hard at all the factors.

    Thanks for the reassurance about the 3rd row. For a while there I worried that it wasn't going to be any more useful than the 3rd row in the wagons we first looked at (why do they even bother putting them in there?). I love how it folds so nice and flat into the floor; a big advantage over the Mercedes, although not as significant as the safety issues.
  • lhrandlhrand Member Posts: 24
    Glad you are getting your car seat situation resolved. The people on that board can be kinda militant about proper car seats and installation, but they do know their stuff!

    I am definitely going to have to think hard about whether we want the '02 ML320, considering the safety issues (including the considerations Dfc101a discussed) against my preference for the driving experience of the MDX. Kind of glad we have several weeks to really decide.
  • lhrandlhrand Member Posts: 24
    I appreciate your input on safety issues. Among the vehicles in this class it is almost splitting hairs - the differences in safety seem like they really depend on the type of crash. Thanks for the info about the Explorer not being available with side-curtains for another year -- I had intended to test-drive one when they arrived at dealerships, but that is just too long to wait, and wouldn't consider an Explorer if not for that feature.

    I, too, was weighing Horizon vs. Roundabout for car seats! I couldn't justify spending more for what seemed to me at the time to just be "the cool thing to have" in car seats, and opted for the Horizon. If buying again today, I would go for the Roundabout. The cost difference is inconsequential compared to the day-to-day hassle of getting the straps on the Horizon tight.
  • jeffmust2jeffmust2 Member Posts: 811
    (off-topic)

    Msu #1825 -

    Acura dealers got so excited about gouging folks on their MDX pricing that the TL-S is just too good to miss.

    I spoke to four (4) dealers in So. CA and three of them told me it was MSRP Plus for the first shipment or two.

    If your Houston dealer has 23 off the truck and sitting on their lot with only a few pre-sold, I wouldn't be surprised if you can do better. And, if they are still not sold down the line when the Acura floor financing runs out, they could well go under MSRP.

    Even with the economy heading south, there's a lot of Californians (north & south) with too much money and not enough brains - and they gotta have the latest vehicle before their neighbors. Makes it hard for us intelligent, rational folks to get good deals!
  • ntinglentingle Member Posts: 1
    Stephens Creek Acura sells at MSRP + wheel locks, mudflaps and running boards (~$1k). Just got ours after ordering in November, but seems like a 6-12 month wait now.

    Another option: They sell their demo models on a first-come basis after they've reached 2000 miles (at MSRP). The current demo is at 1500 (as of 3/4/01) so if you just go on a 500 mile demo ride it's yours...
  • sidwaysidway Member Posts: 6
    I placed an order (at MSRP and NO MANDATORY options) for my MDX 15 days ago and have confirmed delivery in May at Acura Of Libertyville.

    Ive not heard anything bad about Pauly Acura but the folks at Acura in Libertyville were great to deal with. They are a medium size dealer and one of the owners is always there. I dealt with Glen Bockwinkle who is the owner in charge of sales. He was very upfront and didn't speak like the usual car dealers I've dealt with in the past.

    They showed me where the factory ranked them #4 in the Nation for Customer Satisfaction in Service, which really won me over.

    I considered the new Toyota Sequoia but the handling on the MDX was more sporty feeling.
  • salovekusaloveku Member Posts: 22
    I'm interested in your disappointing Volvo experience. I am looking at the Xc as well as the MDX. Why did you not like it?
  • sanand5sanand5 Member Posts: 33
    I've had my MDX for about 4 months. My in city gas mileage is about 16 mpg. I'm really not a leadfoot. With one tank of gas it was as low as 13 mpg. Is everyone else getting about the same?

    Also, I noticed the acceleration in 5th gear is extremely weak. The cruise control often times can't even maintain speed going over an overpass without shifting down into 4th gear. Anyone have the same experience or should I get this checked out?
  • chiller2chiller2 Member Posts: 14
    Thanks for the "wake up call" to call Acura CS. I'll do that and post what happens. Guess I've been too satisfied just to get the car at last to be more adamant about being treated well as a new owner.
  • thewormtheworm Member Posts: 80
    Likewise on both counts -- 15-16 in the city (no leadfoot; worse if I hit lots of red lights) and OD/5th gear is somewhat sluggish going up inclines. OD is meant to be a fuel efficiency gear rather than a performance gear.

    FWIW I get about 22-23+ on the highway @ 65/70 or so. Peeps on acuramdx.org report similar city/hwy mileage.
  • railrrailr Member Posts: 36
    I 've also been dissapointed with the lack of acceleration and gear shifting in fifth gear between 2000 and 2500 rpm... I actually had the dealer check everything to make sure it's okay. I also feel that acceleration around a corner when you apply gas is sluggish - I think it's because when the MDX accelerates it switches to all four wheels, and that's what causes the delay.

    Now the interesting thing, I was at the dealer getting the seatbelt harness replaced for the recall - and they had an MDX with 18" wheels and Michelin 255/55R18 tires (like on the X5) - and I took it for a drive, and it seemed much peppier than mine - better acceleration and cornering... so much so that I'm adding them to mine. After driving this MDX, I wanted to make sure that it just wasn't mine that was a little less than perfect, so I test drove another with stock 17" Michelins and it felt exactly like mine.

    I don't know how much the 18" vs. 17" diameter of the tires can effect the gearing -- but to me it felt much better -- the drive is a little less smooth - you can feel the road more with the 18's (which I like).

    As for mileage - I'm averaging about 17mpg in Los Angeles surface/freeway driving.

    Rail
    -------
    '01 Mahogany MDX Touring w/Nav.
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    image


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • lhrandlhrand Member Posts: 24
    We thought the Volvo wagon would be perfect because it would give us more seating than a sedan plus a little room to haul stuff, be a very safe car, and avoid having to buy something as big as an SUV. If the driving experience had been even the least bit comfortable for me, we would have bought one, but - and of course this is all subjective and may not be true for you - I thought it really felt tank-like to drive, with slow acceleration and just a heavy feel in general. The brakes, however, were touchy compared to what I'm used to, although that's something that's pretty easy to get used to. Adding to the "tank" feeling was the fact that I felt submerged in the car - not enough elbow room, difficult to see around back, seat would not sit up straight enough for my liking, and the steering wheel was difficult to turn. I think a larger, stronger person would have liked it a lot more. I don't know if the XC version would be better in the acceleration department; from what I remember we didn't want 4wd and that was the advantage of the XC. I think there are turbo options that might help on that too. Definitely test it and see what you think. For me, though, after the Volvo, the MDX felt like a magic carpet.

    I came to a hard realization on the third row of seats in this or any other wagon where they face the back (which I think is all of them): they are useless. In my understanding, safety experts advise (and some states require) that children be in carseats or booster seats until they weigh 80 pounds, and no car seat is supposed to be used in a seat that faces the rear of the vehicle, but at least in the Volvo, the seats aren't supposed to be used by anyone over 88 pounds. So keep this in mind if you are counting on the 7-passenger capacity of a wagon! Sorry to be off topic here, but it is important to know.
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    I concur with the comments here. Acura has made the fifth gear very tall, seemingly so it can be used for economical highway cruising. E.g. for loafing down the highway at a constant speed, while getting higher fuel economy. As such it'd be more effective for highway mileage.

    To pass with authority, you either have to floor it (VTEC or whatever it is kicks in with a whoosh), or, better yet, drop your gear. I promise you if you drop the gear for passing, you'll feel enough power and then some ;-)

    A lot of folks seem to be getting 15-16mpg in mostly city-oriented, non-highway driving. But folks who are doing a lot of highway cruising have been getting 21-23mpg. That actually isn't that bad given the general inaccuracy of applying EPA mileage (they don't say "your mileage may vary" for nothing).

    Those with a heavy foot will do a lot worse, as posts here and on other systems have indicated.

    Please also note that the trip computer can be off by a 0.5 mpg to 1.5 mpg, usually understating the mileage. Apparently this isn't unusual in many trip computers.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    railr Mar 5, 2001 11:31pm

    "I don't know how much the 18" vs. 17" diameter of the tires can effect the gearing -- but to me it felt much better -- the drive is a little less smooth - you can feel the road more with the 18's (which I like)."

    This a classic "mod" to get better handling out of any vehicle. And it shouldn't affect the gearing as long as it's done properly. The proper way is to increase the rim diameter and then also decrease the tire sidewall height, what you end up with is an overall tire diameter that is exactly the same as your stock set up. Performance wise, what you end up with is less sidewall to "flex", which results in tighter handling and more road feel. And if you throw on quality wheel spacers, you can actually increase the tire tread width for greater grip.

    Hope this helps,
    TC
  • kenyeekenyee Member Posts: 738
    Also remember that the tradeoff is you don't have as much protection for your rims. My Integra's aluminum alloys were all bent after a few years of Boston potholes. The worst ones were mounted on the rear but you still got a vibration into the cabin from them. :-P

    They do give you better handling though :-)
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    Right. But isn't "driving in Boston" an oxymoron? ;-)

    I've driven in NYC (cabbies from hell) and even downtown Boston traffic scares the heck out of me.
  • kenyeekenyee Member Posts: 738
    How about:
    "getting cut off in Boston"
    "off-roading through potholed streets"
    "dodging pedestrians who ignore crosswalks and walk signals and cars that might hit them"? :-)

    I wouldn't dare drive in NYC...cabbies are nuts there ;-)
  • bphdbphd Member Posts: 9
    Hello All,

    Been lurking for awhile and came dangerously close to getting a Toyota Highlander, but ales, came to my senses and ordered a DE/Tour/NEVI DX. Normally, I don't advertise for dealers but I must tell you about Aura at Langhorne, PA.

    First, I order a DE/Tour/NEVI in December 17th of 2000. Bill Edmonds quoted me MSRP no add ons, and Mid February for a date. Well, on Jan 24 he called letting me know that it had come in. Unfortunately, I had a family emergency and had to turn down the vehicle.

    I called Bill back during on feb 16th and let him know that I was still interested and wanted to order another.

    Well today it came in.......yes people...3 weeks from point of order, MSRP, no add ons.... I am going to pick it up today.

    Give Bill a call, he does out of state sales...
    215-943-7000. Tell him Brian Johnson sent you.

    Brian
  • robart27robart27 Member Posts: 2
    Seriously considering an MDX. A review stated that: " after a long day, seats were not as comfortable a the short drive."

    Need some owner input, after taking an all day drive, and aware of seat comfort. Seats on Volvo XC rated excellent.
  • fearlessffearlessf Member Posts: 1
    How much should I pay to the Acura dealer to add running boards to the MDX?
    It is not standard and it seems necessary for a short person.
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    Seat comfort is a highly subjective item and I'm afraid that no amount of reviews will fully determine if a seat is comfortable for you. It's part of the little differences between our physical builds and the distribution of those builds.

    For example, Consumer Reports says the Passat's seats are "very comfortable" but their review also stated that some of their testersfound "pressure points" in the back. Indeed, when we test drove one, my wife hated it after only 30 minutes.

    While there have been some who have complained about seat comfort in the MDX, there have been many more who say it's very comfortable, including on several-hour trips.

    As far as the Volvo XC goes, I find its ride to be way too firm, so a comfortable seat isn't going to help my comfort in it.
  • wholiganwholigan Member Posts: 148
    Can anyone tell me if the 3.5L in the MDX is the same engine that is in the Honda Odyssey?

    Thanks!
    2003 Honda Odyssey EX-LRES - Midnight Blue Pearl
    2004 Honda Accord EX-L Graphite Pearl
    2007 Honda Civic EX - Atomic Blue
    2013 Honda Civic LX - Crimson Pearl
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    The MDX's engine is a tuned-up version of the Odyssey engine, which itself is based on other Honda engines. So they're not the same.
  • wmquanwmquan Member Posts: 1,817
    This thread (from www.acuramdx.org) contains a message with links to scanned images of the actual Acura Service Bulletin concerning the harness problem that affects a number of early MDX's.

    Please note that each image will take a while to download because each page is a complete image.
This discussion has been closed.