Toyota Sequoia

16667697172169

Comments

  • shweggyshweggy Member Posts: 18
    That report only proves my point of quality problems with past GM vehicles, which I have owned also, GM is "learning" from toyota and is starting to catch up to "ford."

    Heatwave3 I apologize for remarks made in haste against you as it is hard to tell who is answering who in this board. It just happened that your remark followed mine and I made a quick assumption.

    Lets all just all drop the debate and try to help those solve their problems with their current vehicles instead of putting down other peoples rides.

    Can't we all just get along?
  • heatwave3heatwave3 Member Posts: 462
    I agree, we will have a much more valuable discussion if we are focused on data based views and avoid the attacks and slander directed on folks for deciding to purchase a vehicle other than the "perfect" one we happened to have chosen.
  • lcd1lcd1 Member Posts: 147
    As someone pointed out, Tundrasolutions.com has a posting on defective heater core shut-off valve that causes an AC system to under-perform. The owner of that problematic AC system had the valve replaced and now his AC works well.

    I pointed out this potential shut-off valve problem to the manager at Bill Page and he agreed to check to see if my AC has similar problem next Monday. I do hope the this is it because I've spent so much time dealing with people who kept on insisting that my AC is working and that the AC system designed for the Sequoia is inadequate. Really, two people at the dealer told me that the design is bad.

    It is mind boggling that the service department keeps insisting everything is o.k. and that Toyota has not had similar problem when in fact they observed first hand that my AC was putting out 62-65 deg. air on max cooling at 86 deg. outside temperature.

    I'd be so happy to get this AC issue resolved. As someone suggested, I would consider suing under lemon law if I keep getting the run-around and not getting the AC problem fixed.

    The lesson I've learned is that you can't expect much from the dealer and/or from Toyota, even if you've spent $40k on a Toyota truck.

    Maybe I'll be less critical after the AC problem is fixed, but for now it's hard to know that the truck that you paid good money for has a problem that has not been acknowledged by Toyota.
  • moussedogmoussedog Member Posts: 1
    Cliffy1, what is your email address? I live in Virginia and want to buy a 2002. Can you work with me?
  • nighter50nighter50 Member Posts: 127
    I am curious how many of you drive all the time in Overdrive and how many turn off Overdrive and when. Could you post what affects of using Overdrive vs. not using it. I like the extra rpm and more dynamic power when not in Overdrive and according to the instant mpg it appears that i am not losing that much in the way of gas mileage. I am curious though what others are doing and the affects of it.

    Thanks in advance.
  • sbell4sbell4 Member Posts: 446
    Keep doing what you are doing if you are emailing or faxing dealers stating that you wish to purchase "X" with "X,Y,Z" equipment for "$$" over invoice and you find a dealer that can help you focus on what equipment you want and need now that the money part is out of the way.
  • vasyl2vasyl2 Member Posts: 5
    Forget about your Sequoia in Houston. Everyone will be at MSRP or more for the 2 wheel drive SR5's and not much better for the others. Throw in the bogus "Toyo Guard" and your lucky to get out for less than 37K. I'm flying to Tuscaloosa Alabama end of Sept. You can call Harold Guy at Tuscaloosa Toyota, who is their internet sales manager at 1-877-470-2262. Continental flies to Birmingham for a little over $100 one way. They'll pick you up and about 600 miles to drive back home. Well worth the extra effort for what I saved.
  • fanman8fanman8 Member Posts: 65
    I must say that it appears that you have been through a lot with your air conditioning problem. I hope that the fix via the post from Sequoia/Tundra Solutions works for you. I live in south Florida and it has been very hot lately and the air conditioner on my Sequoia has been working exceptionally well. I have not had the need even to use the rear air as the front air has been more than enough to do the job. Sorry that your dealer is not being truthful and telling you that all Sequoia's have under powered a/c's. That is not true. It sounds like that dealership can't sort out your particular a/c problem so their telling you that they are all underpowered hoping you will live with it. Kind of reminds me of a problem that I had once on a Cadillac. The muffler made the vehicle sound like a bucket of bolts. After bringing it in to the dealer I was told that sound was "Characteristic of the vehicle by one of the service advisers. Knowing that that was just a bunch of bull---- I brought the service tech over to a another Cadillac, same model and as it was running quiet as a church mouse ,I said to the service advisor- "I'd like mine to sound like it was characteristic to this one." Needless to say the exhaust system including the mufflers were replaced and the problem was completely resolved.
  • thirdsuvthirdsuv Member Posts: 209
    Just why are you here? Just because you might be a Fortune 50 VP where at work your stooges eagerly lap up your "data based opinions" because you're the boss doesn't mean your ramblings will be listened to here.

    To me you're just a know-it-all GM driving joe-blow who is getting on my nerves. In my opinion, anybody that has spent 25K$+ on a GM product is someone not to listen to. If you're looking for lovin approval of your GM babble, go chat it up with your brothers-in-arms who also bought such fine GM products like the Aztec.

    flamethrower ever at the ready,
    cheers
  • thirdsuvthirdsuv Member Posts: 209
    LCD,

    I haven't followed your problem since my AC feezes my keester off but I do have a question
    so I'll know for the future.

    Is there a written specification for the SEQ on what is acceptable cooling output at different ambient temperatures? Does your vehicle meet that spec?
  • robh3robh3 Member Posts: 157
    Wow thirdsuv, you should reach over and flick that chip off of your shoulder.

    You might recall that all of this got started when an unassuming lady posted a comparison question between the Sequoia and the Tahoe, since she is presently in the market for such a vehicle.

    Interestingly, she has never posted again, and I can't help but wonder if she was turned off by all of the backlash and negative comments that have been levied against the person who brought up a few points about where the Tahoe may actually have a competitive edge vs. the Sequoia. Do you actually believe that the Sequoia is absolutely superior in EVERY aspect of a FS SUV to everything else on the market?
  • fishcarfishcar Member Posts: 18
    Thirdsuv...I'll bet your "polk dot" effect comes from polarization effects from the tint applied to the sun roof. Lots of polymers (plastics) can have polarization effects. I'll bet you are wearing polarized sunglasses...I often see polka dots in tinted windows of other cars (haven't noticed them in my seq), but they aren't visible if I take my polarized glasses off. You might also notice that the visibility of the spots changes if you rotate the lenses of polarized glasses.

    Just got back from a 2000 mile roadtrip with the family (wife, 3 yo, 8 mo). Got 18.3 mpg averaging 75-80 mph. The seq was a much nicer ride than my old 88 4 rnnr or our Honda civic!
  • thirdsuvthirdsuv Member Posts: 209
    Yeah its the polarization. Three different pairs of sunglasses gives 3 different degrees of darkness of polka dots.

    robh3,
    "Do you actually believe that the Sequoia is absolutely superior in EVERY aspect of a FS SUV to everything else on the market?"

    Of course not. But I'll say it is superior overall to anything to anything with three row of seats except maybe TLC/RX470 which of course are just it's dressed up parents. And of course the young kid has some qualities that even the parents don't posses. Of course at the same time you're not going to see me go through all the other SUV forums and try to prove my point.

    As for the "chip", I'm not the one cruising other car forums. If someone stokes the flames, they shouldn't complain when it gets hot. I'm just letting him know that I'm more then willing to bring my flamethower.
  • robh3robh3 Member Posts: 157
    you keep missing the point. The intent was to provide a factual and meaningful response to another poster's question regarding two competing vehicles (one of which is the Sequoia). There where no "flames" thrown in that first response to her question, merely facts that by all accounts seem to be irrefutable. It is up to the person who posed the question as to whether or not those facts are pertinent to her vehicle needs. The first "flames" were thrown subsequent to that response, by Sequoia owners and/or advocates(apparently).

    As for "cruising other car forums", what does that mean, really? Noone "owns" this or any Edmunds TownHall topic by virtue of the car he/she presently drives or even intends to drive in the future. The good ol' USA itself makes the best analogy here: we are free to cross state boundaries at will, stop and visit, just pass on through, whatever, regardless of the state we call "home" and pay taxes in presently, and through our travels and conversations with others, we just might learn something that makes us better-informed people.

    There is a distinction between a debater and a "flamethrower". I'll let you decide for yourself which one will be more beneficial to the masses in the long run.
  • heatwave3heatwave3 Member Posts: 462
    thirdsuv: All I can say is you need to grow up and act like an adult sharing views and data in as respectful a manner as possible. Flame throwing is for teenagers looking to get a rise out of others. Your flaming of others sounds like the temper tantrum of one of my kids.

    BTW, why are you here? If I get on your nerves by simply sharing data from various sites on the web in an effort to respond to someone's question posted here, you have several alternatives. Respond with your own data or opinions, change the screen with the click of a mouse or flame away.

    The last alternative is the least productive, the first is the mature way to engage in a discussion which is the primary purpose of these forums. The second sounds like it might be the best way for you to avoid the need for further medication.

    Seems strange that a guy that seems to think all domestic vehicles are not worthy of being on the road happens to drive a Ford. Or is it just GM that offends you?

    Let's focus on the vehicles and their uses, strengths and weaknesses and less on each other and I think folks will find the dialogue alot more valuable.
  • lcd1lcd1 Member Posts: 147
    Thanks to all who responded to my postings.

    I flipped through the manual but could not find any specification on the AC.

    I wonder if Toyota cars and trucks would cost more if customer service were better. I also wonder why a service department would treat a customer as if he were born yesterday. Anyone in the business care to answer?

    Don't get me wrong, I am still very satisfy with the customer service from the saleslady who sold me the car at Bill Page. It's the service department that makes me wonder.
  • shweggyshweggy Member Posts: 18
    lcd,
    Concerning your AC problem. You need to harass the dealers as much as you can until the problem is fixed even if they have to replace every component in the system at their cost. The rest of us seem to have air conditioners that work extremely well, so there is no excuse for them to give up on you. If the dealer is resistent to helping you write letters to the better business bureau and your state attorneys office, and Toyota USA headquarters concerning your problem with facts collected, both here and by yourself, stating that the dealer is operating in bad faith, and send copies of these letters to the dealer refusing to fix the problem. See if this makes them a little more helpful.
  • lcd1lcd1 Member Posts: 147
    Thanks to all who responded to my postings.

    I flipped through the manual but could not find any specification on the AC.

    I wonder if Toyota cars and trucks would cost more if customer service were better. I also wonder why a service department would treat a customer as if he were born yesterday. Anyone in the business care to answer?

    Don't get me wrong, I am still very satisfy with the customer service from the saleslady who sold me the car at Bill Page. It's the service department that makes me wonder.
  • thirdsuvthirdsuv Member Posts: 209
    "I flipped through the manual but could not find any specification on the AC. "

    Are you talking about the full service manual? It seems very strange that the only criteria for AC performance is technician Fred saying "Seems cold enuff to me."

    There's got to be an objective spec or you should be able to measure the ouput of a new SEQ and tell them you want it to work like that. When they say that yours is in the acceptable range of performance you then say "show me the spec".

    OTOH, you might be on the very bad end of a very wide specification and then you're SOL.
  • thirdsuvthirdsuv Member Posts: 209
    robh3,
    As in forums and politics, there is a time for debate, and when that fails, a time for flamethrowing (literally).

    As someone else said before in this forum, an append about payload may be interesting, the 10th append about its DIRE CONSEQUENCES !!!! is tiring.

    Your crusing USA is a great support of my arguement.....if you come crusing into central NC pedaling you're ketchup-based barbecue junk you better expect a cool reception from the vinegar crowd. Normally when I go crusing, I find out I learn more by listening instead of yappin.
  • heatwave3heatwave3 Member Posts: 462
    Now might be a perfect time for some to listen versus yappin' instead of slamming the quality of somebody elses choice of vehicles....once again.

    For the record: I dropped the payload issue some time ago, however IMO it was a topic worthy of a healthy discussion. (Who knows, maybe manufacturers are starting to manipulate their payload ratings to accomodate the new government rollover ratings. If you lower the GVWR, which automatically lowers the payload, it may give you a better government rollover calculation. However since the topic doesn't seem to warrant further discussion based on those that feel threatened by data, I guess we shouldn't explore it.)

    It took those who were threated by a discussion about Sequoia's payload less than 4 posts over several days on the subject before the attack went against the poster instead of the data. Forums should be about light not heat.
  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    Heatwave - you and I don't agree on much, but I'm behind you 100% on this one. Thirdsuv has clearly stepped over the line. There are clear rules of engagement on these boards - rules, that in my opinion, are being violated. We should aspire to having orderly, reasoned discussions.

    If you don't mind, I'll be your wingman.

    Fire when ready - heatwave.
  • heatwave3heatwave3 Member Posts: 462
    Disagreement is one of the reasons these forums even exist. Disrespect, IMO, has no place in a forum and delivers no value. If flaming generates some personal reward for the poster it says alot about that individual and his/hers values that others should take into consideration when evaluating all of the flamer's opinions.

    thirdsuv finds a way to slam folks (and is proud of it) on this forum and others. The smart folks take his flaming into consideration when responding to or giving value to any of his opinions.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    In lieu of going back and removing a bunch of posts since yesterday, for the moment I'll just remind folks of the Member Agreement and the civility & respect section.

    Steve
    Host
    Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards

  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    I knew I could get the Host's attention. In my original post I included some comments about the Host's decision to stay out of the scorch fest, but deleted them for fear of being too obvious.

    Thank you for stepping in.
  • raybearraybear Member Posts: 1,795
    Cliffy's email address is in his personal profile. His is one of the better dealerships in Virginia.
  • gedmundscgedmundsc Member Posts: 29
    Just experienced either an anomaly or a neat design in the Cruise Control. While recently returning from MA, I had the cruise control @65mph. The highway had some serious bumps and the cruise control disengaged as though I had hit the break. I looked at the instrument panel and saw the light was still on (Cruise). I thought maybe I hit it accidently. I went back up to speed and hit the resume and all was fine, then I hit some more serious bumps and it disengaged again. I realized this was either an anomaly or a design feature. If it is designed in then that it is a nice safety feature to protect you in the event the car goes off the road or out of control, the cruise will automatically disengage.

    Has anyone else experienced this?
  • gedmundscgedmundsc Member Posts: 29
    While at my mtg in MA, the other member of the team had driven his Navigator up there. He said he was getting between 8-11 miles per gallon. I am consistently getting 22-23 miles per gallon and 15.5 when I tow my 3K lbs trailer. I have heard numerous horror stories about gas mileage on competitive vehicles, but I don't see too many discussions on this when doing comparisons.

    The only other one I know of was my in-laws next door neighbor who bought the Explorer last year and traded it in because he was getting 8 miles per gallon. Sorry to say he didn't buy a Sequoia this time either, could be he didn't know they existed.
  • hookeyhookey Member Posts: 54
    Very interesting information on the cruise control. I guess that makes sense though as the SEQ applies the brake to certain wheels whn instability is sensed. Applying the brake automatically turns off the cruise control.

    My milage on the SEQ is quite a bit lower than yours. I've never exceeded 20 mpg. I'm generally around 18.5 mpg on the highway and more like 15.5 in the city.
  • hookeyhookey Member Posts: 54
    I think most readers of this board appreciate the discussion of the SEQ including negative comments. It is immature not to want to know the bad along with the good. I was interested in the point about SEQ's payload, my only criticism was that the same point was made in 10 separate messages that you posted in a three day period.

    Your point made in post #3437 about the reason for the lower maximum payload may indeed be correct. My suspicion is that lawyers got involved here. If a manufacturer were to be sued for a SUV flipover, they could present a defense that said the driver had exceeded the maximum payload for the vehicle, so the lower that number is the more useful it is in defending the company. Also any government rollover testing would likely be done with the maximum payload recommended by the manufacturer, so that lowering the payload number would give you better test results.

    Peace.
  • gillygangillygan Member Posts: 17
    That's great. I posted an apology-in-general to calm down the situation... and ya'll still pluckin' each other nerves. Can't we get along? :)

    Gil.
  • dog71dog71 Member Posts: 9
    Any word on the 2002's yet? Colors, changes, etc? I am getting anxious.

    Also, does anyone have any thoughts or opinions about the payload of a Seqouia verses GM models, etc?

    just kidding...
  • gratefuldadgratefuldad Member Posts: 17
    Icd1,

    I couldn't find, or was too lazy, the beginning of your thread, but I assume your AC isn't pushing out very cold air. I don't know what you are blowing, but I imagine you should be getting at least 48 degrees. Anyway, I saw a similar problem elsewhere and georgeseq suggested the problem could be with the heater shut-off valve. The post was as follows:

    "I checked my heater shut-off valve today and it is defective. i.e. when you turn on the A/C there is a valve on the firewall which shuts off the coolant going to the heat exhange for heat. Check your hose after the shut-off valve; if the hose is "hot" with the engine running, A/C on, you too could have a defective shut off valve.. The hose should be decidedly cooler than the hot side if the valve is working properly.. If the valve is leaking the A/C effectiveness is greatly reduced.."

    I should also note that I believe the rear AC on the SEQ does not have a shut-off valve, probably just bad design. Anyway, because of this, the rear AC never gets at cold as the front.

    Good luck, I hope this helps.
  • gratefuldadgratefuldad Member Posts: 17
    Quote from Toyota Press release:

    "...Sequoia, Toyota's mainstream full-size SUV for eight passengers, remains unchanged for 2002. Fog lamps and remote keyless entry are now available as stand-alone options on SR5 models. Sequoia SR5 base prices range from $31,265 for the 2WD to $34,795 for the 4WD. Limited model prices range from $39,405 for the 2WD model to $42,725 for the 4WD. Compared to 2001 models, Sequoia prices increase by only $150, or 0.4% on a comparably equipped basis.
    ..."
  • jbarmjbarm Member Posts: 17
    Hate to be off topic and not be in the middle of the Tahoe vs Seq battle....

    I have a 01 Seq SR5 that I ordered without the Convenience Pkg and thus did not come with the keyless remote. I didn't order it but I did get the glass breakage sensor and lo and behold the alarm system (it's armed by locking the door with my key).

    I want to add the Toyota keyless entry to my rig, any idea on how to do it? I don't want to add an aftermarket set up on top of my existing alarm system.

    Local dealer's parts and service managers are befuddled as to why I didn't get the remotes in the first place.

    Any ideas?

    jb
  • genghis721genghis721 Member Posts: 53
    Is the 4wd full or part time on this truck?
  • gwkisergwkiser Member Posts: 326
    There's one thing you can count on with Steve: He's not afraid to battle. Just check him out on the friday freeway trivia here!

    [I got your back, Steve! ]
  • cliffy1cliffy1 Member Posts: 3,581
    I've been moved to our finance office on a temporary basis until my ankle heals and the office I am in has no Internet access so I'm catching up today.

    1. Thanks Raybear.
    2. Dog71, they're out now. Most dealerships have already received their first few 2002s. No color changes except the deletion of the brown. I haven't examined the new ones to tell you any subtle changes. I'm a bit stuck in the office for now.
    3. What happened to civility.
  • 714cut714cut Member Posts: 355
    There has been a lot of discussion about payload and towing capacity. One post talked about the Highlander vs. Sequoia for payload. If you are going to haul 1500 pounds of people and gear I'd much rather haul it in a Sequoia than the Highlander. It is a much smaller percentage of the overall vehicle weight.
    As for towing, the 8000 pound towing capacity of the Yukon may be impressive but quite frankly you'd be stupid and in a dangerous situation to tow with that much weight. Again, specs vs. what is common sense. To tow that much you should be using a 3/4 ton or higher truck.
    Toyota uses very conservative numbers for their specifications. Probably the legal department dictating that. Structurally I don't believe there is that much difference between a Sequoia and Yukon to justify 2000 lbs towing difference.

    I think a previous post talked about how one SUV may be better than the other for different individuals. I agree. None are perfect. But the Sequoia is a gem. I have extensively driven all the rest but settled on the Sequoia. I've had it now for 9 months.
  • obyoneobyone Member Posts: 7,841
    The Yukon has a 2500 or 3/4 ton version.

    "Toyota uses very conservative numbers for their specifications. Probably the legal department dictating that. Structurally I don't believe there is that much difference between a Sequoia and Yukon to justify 2000 lbs towing difference."

    You're the towing/hauling expert? I don't think anyone should exceed the manufacturer's recommended limits. No matter what you think. It would be foolish to do so. I'm sure you'll agree.
  • 714cut714cut Member Posts: 355
    Wow there's a lot of vehemence on this board lately. I do not consider myself a towing expert-do you? I do tow however on a regular basis. I am not advocating the exceeding of manufacturers limits. I was simply commenting about the difference of the two vehicles. Also the Yukon does not have a 2500 or 3/4 ton version- the Yukon XL does. A different vehicle.
    Also what is with the bold print? We are capable of reading without your need to do that.

    May the Force be with you
  • genghis721genghis721 Member Posts: 53
    Does anyone know if the 4wd is full or part-time on this truck?
  • dptbonesdptbones Member Posts: 21
    Well I've decided on the limited, going with either black or gray. I have several last minute questions before giving my deposit.

    I have a deal for $500 over invoice. I know I'll have to pay the $530 destination charge and the Southest toyota $550 "administrative" charge. But the dealership is trying to charge me a $399 administrative charge also. Since they are getting to keep the holdback of roughly $750 (2%) and I'm giving them $500 profit, that's a total of $1250, plenty in my mind. I told my salesman that I'm not paying the $399 fee. Anyone have any experience with this?

    Next. Anyone heard of any wood trim that is not adhesive? The bad thing about the Limited is that the gray finish will show around the wood laminate and that would not look good. Has anyone asked the dealer to order the Limited with the dash trim of the SR5? Would it be possible?

    Anyone want to give their opinion of thunder gray vs black. I'm in florida, but I just don't think the color paint will make a big difference in interior temperature. I'm more worried about every little ding and scratch being hard to hide on the black. My wife and I both like this color the best by far, but we are so practical that its killing us to think about the upkeep on a black vehicle.

    Does anyone know the 2002 invoice pricing of the base 4x2 limited and the invoice pricing on the options? Its not available on the site here yet. My salesman told me that he does have the 2002 pricing yet, though he can order a vehicle with options and give me the whole invoice price, just not broken down.

    Anyone from the SE feel that the Toyoguard package is worth the dealers cost? They try to charge about 600, but the cost is something like $100. My deal is $500 over invoice so I would get the various protectents at cost. Anyone have an opinion?

    What about extended warranties? Can I get one later? How good a deal can I get?

    Thanks for any help you can give. Wish me luck the order goes in just as soon as we decide on the color.

    Bones
  • thunderoakthunderoak Member Posts: 2
    We have looked at the big 7-8 seat SUV's (Sequoia, Escalade, Navigator, Denali) and have decided to buy a Sequoia Limited. We want Thunder Gray for the exterior color (we really want the Desert Sand Mica color but its not available on the Limited). We also want the Oak interior. Problem is, we haven't been able to find one with this combination in our area (Chicago). Does anyone out there have one with this combo? Does it look OK? Was it hard to find?

    Also, any comments about how much above invoice would be a decent price on a Limited? Thanks for any feedback.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    The Toyota 4WD systems explained discussion may be of interest too.

    Steve
    Host
    Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards

  • movanmovan Member Posts: 32
    Dptbones, you asked about black vs Thunder Gray. I've had a black car before--no car color looks better--but it only lasts 15 minutes before the haze appears on it. I went with Thunder Gray when I bought my LTD in November. Fantastic opalescent color when it's clean and the sun hits it.

    On the metal tone dash, I installed a Wood View kit that covers the silver entirely. Makes a big difference in how the interior looks.
  • dptbonesdptbones Member Posts: 21
    Movan,
    Does the wood trim completely cover everything? Even the little depression just forward of the switch for the windows on the side? Where did you get this kit? How much did you pay? I'm concerned about the fading issue also. We are really agnozing over the thunder gray vs black issue.

    I saw a desert sand mica with limited logos on it in the back lot of a dealership. I'm thinking one of the salesmen purchased an SR5 and then put limited emblems on it. Am I right? My wife and I looked at it long and hard to try to figure out what we were missing, but this is the only explanation I could come up with.

    Keep the opinions coming. I will probably order the Sequoia in the next week.

    Anyone want to give me their experience with the administrative fee charged by the dealership?

    Thanks for your help.
    DPTBONES
  • sbell4sbell4 Member Posts: 446
    An Admin fee is a fee that is charged by the distributor to the dealer for regional support and there is not any profit built into it. Your dealer is probably calling a D.O.C. fee or a clerical fee an admin fee because it sounds better. Just about all transactions in life have some form of fee added to it and I trust that the 399 fee is legitimate for their dealership.
  • lcd1lcd1 Member Posts: 147
    My experience with fees added on by dealers in Northern VA gives me the impression that they are for profit, as I see different fees vary from one dealer to another. For example, the "processing fee", which varies from dealer to dealer, of $150 can be waived. My dealer did waive it for me.

    The only fee I found to be uniform is the Toyota something fee of about $650 (I forget the exact amount), which is imposed by Toyota for this region. Other regions in the country pay less and some pay more. It's grossly murky and unfair, in my opinion.
  • genghis721genghis721 Member Posts: 53
    I still find it amazing that people actually prefer wood over metal or good polymer surfaces. The Lincoln Navigator, with its wood STEERING WHEEL is probably the worst incarnation of this. The only cars that really look good with wood are upscale Mercedes and possibly the Jags.

    I know this is my opinion, but asking for wood trim leads manufacturers to do the unthinkable -- fake wood trim.

    K
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.