We have temporarily turned off the ability to post while we deal with a massive spam attack. Thank you for your patience.

Nissan Pathfinder

13132343637158

Comments

  • will555will555 Member Posts: 2
    The PF's manual advises that w/ the 3.5L needs at least 91 octane (AKI) gasoline. On the inside of the filler lid/cover is a statement saying that for maximum performance premium fuel is recommended. I am aware that there are temperatures differences at which the different octanes ignite and to avoid knocking in "high performance" vehicles use higher octane levels. Is the ECU (fuel management system) compensating for the (octane) differences? If so, then how much is the system "stressed" when using 87 octane on a regular basis? I ask this to see if there are any detrimental (long-term) effects from continuing to use regular. I know I could play on the safe side and opt to buying only premium, but have you seen the price of gas lately??!!
  • zellerdudezellerdude Member Posts: 1
    My 1998 Pathfinder LE has the dreaded Nissan Window Disease! My driver's side window goes up slowly, and even slower if it is real cold outside. I've taken it into the dealer before (under warranty) and I believe they lubricated the channels - which solved the problem for a couple years. Now that its out of warranty and needs help again, does anyone know if this is somethiing that is easily done by an average guy, or is there some stuff you have to take apart to do this? Thanks in advance for any advice!
  • meca2meca2 Member Posts: 284
    On page GI-8 in the ESM it states that "Use unleaded gasoline with an octane rating of at least 87 AKI (anti-knock Index) number RON (research octane number 91).AKI is the average of RON and MON (Motor octane Number). AKI is the number posted on the retail gasoline pumps. So therefor it is OK to use regular fuel. drew the HOST might be more help sence this has been brought up several times in the past. Steve
  • filodfilod Member Posts: 189
    Lofquest,
    It is really tough to compare vehicles with features and prices....

    The Lexus 300 has the traction control, the PF the limited slip differential, Acura MDX variable tourque management 4W drive, the Mercedes M320 calls theirs full-range ASR traction control, etc.

    I liked the Acura MDX but it will be $8+ more than the PF Le with the same features that I want. The $30K (more or less) PF LE with the leather 4x4 LSD is already a stretch for me so the MDX is just not within my budget.

    Just review each vehicle, and decide which will be important to your buying decision. Maybe a list of what you want on the left and what you can forego on the right on a sheet of paper will help..

    Oh I wish all of these SUVs will have the same feature and not confuse us.....

    I am enjoying every mile of driving the PF LE... I am one of those who is fascinated with horsepower and that is provided by the New Pathfinder... 240 hp same as what I wanted initially the MDX.. you can really feel the power (don't complain of mileage if you want to drive hard)... Some may go for the looks... others love the front grille of the QX4 but my wife preferred the PF because she hates the QX4 grille...I wanted the Sierra silver and she wanted the Sahara beige (just guess what we ended buying...u are right the beige!)

    Once you decided and liked the vehicle, just enjoy it. Good luck in whatever you decide.
  • bob_pathbob_path Member Posts: 14
    Has anyone purchased a 2001 Pathfinder LE with a power antenna? I was told by a dealer today that none of the Pathfinders come equipped with a power antenna. He informed me that the only SUV, on the market today, with a power antenna is the Ford Explorer limited. Also are Bridgestone tires standard on the LE? I thought Dunlop was the better brand.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    Your dealer is wrong, plenty of SUVs come with power ant's including the PF. What he failed to tell you/realize is that the Canadian version of the PF still comes with the power ant. And previous years of USA PFs came with power ant's.

    Don't you just love "dealers"?
  • lofquistlofquist Member Posts: 281
    filod,
    Good analysis. But I was trying to do the comparison for someone else who asked (who was that now??). I am a thoroughly satisfied 2001 Path SE owner. After spending 4+ hours at the auto show the other night I still didn't see a vehicle in it's class I would trade it for.

    Now if you through an Audi S4 Avant in there I might be swayed.

    -Jon
  • lofquistlofquist Member Posts: 281
    bob_path,
    The US Paths don't come with power antenna; the ones in Canada do. So you can either go to Canada to get your Path (and save a few thousand bucks too) or call up to Canada and buy a power antenna and replace the fixed mast.
    -Jon
  • danogdanog Member Posts: 318
    Thanks Drew!

    Finally got a resolution from the oil change business. After waiting a week on the bolts, tools and time I was able to get the striped holes tapped and the new bolts installed. I bought a Metric tap & die set and bolts extractor from Sears. It was very simple to remove the broken bolt as was tapping the holes.
    Take a tip from me, make sure the oil change business you use DOESN'T use an air tool to reinstall the bolts. They are very small and will cross thread very easily.
    They refunded all money I spent repairing the Pathy. Although all is OK, I doubt I will take it back and just do the oil changes myself.
    Good luck,
    Dano
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    I believe the new 3.5L V6 engine requires premium fuel with at least octane 91. You can use regular (87 octane) petrol if you really cannot find 91, since the knock sensors and engine computer will compensate for the lower octane. However, in order to prevent this from degrading fuel economy or damaging your engine, I wouldn't use 87 octane petrol over the long run. To me, the savings are not worth the risk.
  • drew_drew_ Member Posts: 3,382
    For uphill sections in deep snow, low range is good. However, keep in mind that with low range, you have over 2 times the amount of torque going to the wheels. This will make them easier to break free on slippery surfaces, and that may cause your vehicle to dig into the ground and get stuck. Just something to be aware of. Have fun in the snow! Wish there was some here...


    Drew
    Host
    Vans, SUVs, and Aftermarket and Accessories message boards
  • meca2meca2 Member Posts: 284
    The service manual clearly states to "use" fuel with a rating at least
    87 AKI. We all know the service manual cannot be wrong?
    Octane rating tips in the owners manual says that fuel as low
    as 85 AKI can be used in high altitudes (over 4000 ft). It does strongly
    stress that you should not hear any persistant spark knock.
    Steve
  • qx4qx4 Member Posts: 99
    for the person asking about tires
    i believe the ones here came with dunlop
    but not sure....it could have came with the Duellers. not sure though.

    i know for fact that some 01QX4s came with the Dunlops and some came with the Michilen LTX. i insisted of picking out the one with the michilens. but i guess it depends on the date the production run...and i was shopping in the period of change over.

    through my experience from my 98 pathfinder which i had, the dueller suck. replaced them with the LTX michilens...they are great and they last much longer. more sure footed and handles better as well. from my experience that is.
  • the_gladiatorthe_gladiator Member Posts: 58
    Jon, Don & Majorwoody,
    Thanks for the info on the use tax.
    Brad
  • marks1970marks1970 Member Posts: 25
    I spoke to a sales manager yesterday at a Nissan dealership, and we were talking about the upcoming 2002 Xterra that will have a 210-hp supercharged engine. Currently the Xterra uses the same 170-hp engine as the 99.5-2000 Pathfinders. He said the only difference between the 210-hp engine and the current 170-hp engine is the addition of the supercharger. He then told me that Nissan will begin selling the supercharger as an add-on for the 3.3L 170-hp engine, which then could supposedly be added to the 3.3L Pathfinder.

    Anyone else hear of this or can confirm this?
  • filodfilod Member Posts: 189
    jon,

    sorry for the misunderstanding...good to know that you are happy with your PF like me..
  • filodfilod Member Posts: 189
    will555

    I read this article that maybe worth sharing.. for me if the engine was designed for premium gas to run its best, that is what I will follow. The sensor will adjust the engine if regular gas is used to run less efficiently and I don't want that to happen to my engine.

    "Vehicles with high-performance, high-compression engines do need premium fuel to run their best. Fortunately, most cars on the road today that were built to consume higher octane gasoline come equipped with electronic knock sensors. Pump in regular and the knock sensors tell the engine management system to run a little less efficiently, protecting it from the ill effects of knocking, but with a consequent minor loss of power"

    I think I messed up and the message was posted twice.. hope I was successful deleting, if not I am sorry it was not intentional.
  • bludev83bludev83 Member Posts: 2
    This has happened twice on my 2001 SE 4WD:
    The CRUISE light is illuminated right after I start the engine (The SET light stays off). Cruise should stay off until selected, right? I can extinguish the CRUISE light by pressing the CRUISE ON/OFF switch. This problem is intermittent so the dealer is not offering much help so far. Any ideas or similar experiences?
  • mosher1234mosher1234 Member Posts: 7
    Does anybody know if you can get the moldings that are on the lower door panels of an Infiniti QX4 for the Pathfinder. It's a great solution for door dings and it would fit perfectly, even it it had to be painted to match.
  • mosher1234mosher1234 Member Posts: 7
    Has anyone replaced the antenna on the 2001 PF with the power antenna? Does it mount easily? Does the radio have the connections already set for power and radio on/off. Any information would be appreciated as on my last Pathfinder, when the carwash removed the antenna, they scratched the paint. On my new one, I remove it first but I'd rather have a power antenna.
  • hasanashasanas Member Posts: 19
    I keep on getting the reading of "ICE" on my temp display, even when the temperature isn't close to the freezing point? Does anyone know the range in Farenheuit of when the temperature gauge should read "ICE".

    Thanks.
  • qx4qx4 Member Posts: 99
    i know its near zero celcius. i think up to 3 or 4.
  • phil47phil47 Member Posts: 394
    Although the engines on the 99.5/2000 PF and the Xterra are the same, there were enough "plumbing" changes made to accomodate the supercharger that it would be a difficult and currently unsupported addition to a PF. At least that is what I was told by both Nissan Canada and Eaton (who manufacture the supercharger for the X) when I was inquiring for my 99.5 PF LE. I finally gave up and bought a 2001 LE. If you are looking for a supercharger, I know Stillen was developing one for the X and potentially for the PF.
  • phil47phil47 Member Posts: 394
    I know you can order the QX4 side moldings and have them installed on a PF (I inquired about it a year ago). They will fit, however....they are EXTREMELY expensive (around $200 per door) and require painting and professional installation (they require drilling into the doors). It ended up being way too expensive and option for me.
  • jmtreetopjmtreetop Member Posts: 130
    Does anyone know how much an electric antenna costs for the 2001's??
  • phil47phil47 Member Posts: 394
    as qx4 states, I believe the gauge starts warning about potential icing conditions ABOVE the freezing point (although the manual talks about below freezing). Mine starts indicating ICE at around + 1 or +2 deg C. I know many other vehicles (including BMW) do the same thing.
  • phil47phil47 Member Posts: 394
    If that's what the service manual states for the 2001 with the VQ35DE engine, then it is clearly different from the owner's manual. On page 10-2 (capacities and recommended fuel) it states to use "Unleaded gasoline with an octane rating of at least 91 AKI (RON 96)". On page 10-4 it states that, "... using other than the specified fuel could adversly affect the emission control devices and systems and affect the warranty coverage".
  • bob_pathbob_path Member Posts: 14
    I'm curious to find out what the color of choice for the owners of their 2001LE pathfinder in this forum. I am undecided on the exterior color between the sierra gray, sahara biege, and the super black.
  • mbuntingmbunting Member Posts: 158
    I have a LE w/ Sierra Silver and love it! I had previously wanted a Super Black PF, but I didn't want it to look dirty 90% of the time. Sierra Silver looks pretty sharp, all cleaned up or even a little dirty IMHO.

    Super Black can look "super" all cleaned up...but how long does that last?

    Good luck
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    "sierra gray"? I think you are mixing color names.

    Have owned a Sahara Beige/Gold, always looked good, and it gave a "rich" look to the PF.

    When we were shopping the PF this year, Black and Bronzed Gray were on the short list, since we alreay had a Sahara Beige (which I still like).
  • li_sailorli_sailor Member Posts: 1,081
    Obviously, color is a personal choice thing, but...I really wanted black since I think nothing shows off a car more than a clean, shiny black finish (and my integra was black). But my GF talked me out of it, citing higher accident rates for hard-to-see black. So it was silver or bronze-gray. After working out the numbers with the dealer and it was down to the color, I looked at one of each in the showroom...same light, about 25 feet apart...back and forth...this and that...and, although I gave the b/g an edge 'cause I knew how popular silver was and I like to be a little different...in the end I thought the PF just looked better in the silver. Have seen many of each since and haven't regretted the choice.
  • meca2meca2 Member Posts: 284
    phil47: The service manual clearly stated "use 87 AKI". I can e-mail
    you the page if you like. I talked about this to a long time friend that works at the dealer and also if you look in the owners manual it also say to monitor for any spark knock. Here in Oregon the fuel is not monitored by the state and the Premium fuel is not worth putting
    in your lawn mower. The fuel also during the winter has at least 10%
    alcohol in it witch raises the octane. I realy feel that if you detect no spark knock 87 AKI should be ok. Steve
  • qx4qx4 Member Posts: 99
    Had the super black for a 98 model
    looks amazing when clean but when dirty the car looked older than the 95 beige max that i still have.

    as someone else said, looks the best when clean but when dirty 95% of the time in canada's winter it look rough.

    bottom of the line i replaced the 96LE black with a Beige/Gold 2001 model QX4. i wanted the silver but it only came with the dark interior.

    good luck. i vote for silver and beige.
  • plwilliamsplwilliams Member Posts: 96
    I picked the Sahara Beige over the Sierra Silver only because of the interior color. The charcoal was just to "black" for my liking and my previous experience with black was, just as with the exterior, it looked great, when sparkling clean, but really showed any dust, dirt, etc.
    My personal opinion is that both colors look sharp on the PF and you should heavily factor in the interior color that you prefer.
  • nismofreaknismofreak Member Posts: 120
    Meca2,
    I will take you up on your offer for the emailing of those pages in the service manual. Since my owners' manual calls for Premium fuel, I will gladly fill it with it unless Nissan tells me different. email: nismofreak@yahoo.com

    Knocking:
    Does everyone who is putting regular fuel in (vehicle operation under 4000 ft above sea level) know how a knock sensor works? Once a knock is sensed (based on a particular frequency), the ECU will back off on the timing (you won't hear this). This is why is it less efficient because the engine is not igniting the mixture completely so you will yield worst mileage. However, the amount the ECU can delay the timing is finite. Given a nice hot and humid day running near or at full load, the propensity for knocking is greatly increase and if the ECU has maxed the delay, the engine will just knock along as your rings and pistons take some massive abuse. (Remember you are igniting the mixture which is exploding where the piston travel is colliding with the expanding force as it tries to compress. This is the pinging that one hears. And you see how powerful your truck is? So imagine that in opposite effect!)

    An engine is pretty noisy to begin with. If you (the driver/owner) actually hear the engine knocking, that simply means that damage is occurring to your engine. If I were leasing my Pathy, I probably wouldn't care but I keep vehicles for a long time so...

    Octane:
    The higher the octane number (AKI), the harder is it to ignite. However, there is more latent energy stored in the molecule chains. Ever wonder why race cars use 104 or 110 octane fuel? It is dyno proven the amount of HP is gained. Also, the added protection of a lowered risk of knocking. This means they can advance the spark timing to yield a more complete and efficient burn. The lower the octane rating, the easier it is to burn, the greater the chance of knocking.

    Good luck in your choice of gas rating. If Nissan lied to us in the owners' manual, then the above explanation goes out the window for the VQ35DE.

    nismofreak
    10,000+ miles in 6 months of ownership
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    Great explanation, well done. I'm not into wasting money, but I always wonder why folks will spend $30K+ dollars on a vehicle and will squable over 10 cents a gallon or a couple hundred dollars a year to protect their vehicle purchase.

    The new V6 is a high compression engine, it likes high octane fuel (>89 AKI). YMMV and folks are free to do whatever they like.
  • li_sailorli_sailor Member Posts: 1,081
    I second the appreciation, nismofreak, for that info.

    As I weighed pros and cons prior to purchase I considered the PF's requirement for premium a negative but when I did the calculation I realized it was not that significant. In any case, now I shop around and keep track of the cost when I'm logging mileage & gallons. BTW, after averaging 12-13 for the first 600 miles or so, I've been averaging about 17 with about 1/3 of that highway.

    I have a question: since the PF requires 91 octane but I can only find 93, I was wondering...if you mixed 93 with 89, would that be equivalent to 91? I'm not saying I'd do it (seems like too much trouble for a few pennies) but I'm curious.
  • crikeycrikey Member Posts: 1,041
    I did like Sahara Beige and Sierra Silver but after seeing the Burnt Cherry with Beige Leather interior, I knew that was the color for my wife and I. Like any other dark color, it does get to look a bit dirty quite easily.
  • bgritzbgritz Member Posts: 139
    Even though here at altitude in Denver we can use as low as 85, I still put the Premium in. I switched to mid for a few tanks, but my millage went down 2 mpg.

    I sat down and figured it out, and the mid-grade w/the decreased mpg was actually costing me a couple of pennies per gallon when compared to the Premium with better milage.

    I would rather have the better gas, even if it did cost me a few buck more.

    just my $.02---literally

    brian
  • woodyr1woodyr1 Member Posts: 142
    I have two questions relating to the roof rack on my 2001 Pathfinder XE:

    (1) there are two rubber strips about a foot long each (one each side) which fasten into the roof rack track at the windshield end. These strips would appear to limit the forward placement of the bars. I have no sunroof on my model, so am wondering what their purpose is?

    (2) my owners manual illustrates the US rack, where knurled knobs are used to move the crossbars fore and aft. I have no such a setup on my Canadian model and am curious as to how the bars move along the track.

    My intent is to install Yakima locking railriders in the tracks, so that my Yakima bike mount, ski rack etc., can be used.

    Thanks in advance

    Woody
  • lofquistlofquist Member Posts: 281
    Woody,
    If you have no sunroof the inserts serve no real purpose. Just pull them out. For those of us who have sunroofs, you can do the same as long as you remember to not open it when you have stuff on top (or check the clearance).

    Otherwise you have found the small advantages of the Canadian rack. Better security - use the torx screwdriver in the glove box to remove the plugs in the end of the towers and then loosen the towers themselves with it to move them. The Yakima railriders (or Thule towers) will mount in the gutters just like the US models.

    If you later decide to attach lightweight items like skiis directly to the crossbars, note that the Canadian crossbars are slightly wider (better stability, less wind noise, better looking). For Yakima use 17V and 18H instead of 10V and 23H. For Thule use C35 instead of C27.

    I have all of these systems for ultimate flexibility. All work great.

    -Jon
  • phil47phil47 Member Posts: 394
    I have had the K&N in my truck for a few tankfuls now. I haven't calculated my mileage lately to see if it is making a difference (and with switching in and out of 4wd and dramatically changing outside temperatures there is too much variability anyways!!). Have you been tracking your mileage and noticed a difference?
  • danogdanog Member Posts: 318
    We went with Super Black on our 01 LE. Man is it hot in the summer!!!! Very little airflow makes it to the rear so it takes a long time to cool down. If you live in a hot area you might want to consider another color. This was discussed last year and you might see it again when it starts to warm up. Nissan really needs to reengineer the A/C for their pathy!!!! After a thorough cleaning ours stays clean for about a week unless it rains. We park in the basement at home but road grime is impossible to avoid.

    On the fuel issues, I have always believed that the higher the octane the better for your car. Even though many people are starting to believe otherwise I will not EVER change that belief. Why? Well if you have ever been around racing or know a little about combustion you know. With higher compression engines, even with new knock sensor technology, lower grade octane will reduce engine performance. Whether or not it is cleaner is another debate itself.
    Just my 2 cents....

    Dano
  • terrahawkterrahawk Member Posts: 10
    Hi, the left front bumper on my '96 Pathfinder was slightly dented this weekend after being hit by another vehicle (I assume that is what happened since it was parked at a restaurant and I don't know who did it). The area of damage is a dent about 1/2" deep, 2"*5" in diameter just above the left turn signal. There is a slight crack in the left turn signal plastic housing as well.

    I will take it in for an estimate once the snow stops falling here (MN) and would appreciate any advice on getting it repaired (I have a $500 deductable). Is the bumper metal or plastic? Also, wondering if its worth getting a front guard/grill?

    Thanks, Peter
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    These items are ideal in preventing these low-speed, non-traffic mishaps. While these things aren't designed for additional crash safety, it's better they get scratched than your car paint. It's easy enough to take off a front guard after a few years and have it repainted, chromed, etc. Meanwhile, your vehicle was saved some abuse.
  • brian60brian60 Member Posts: 76
    I concur with tonychrys, having witnessed an oblivious driver back right up into a parked Land Cruiser with a grill guard while attempting to parallel park on Haight. The car got some scuffing on the painted bumper, but the grill guard was no worse for the wear.

    Considering that these things were originally designed to protect a vehicle during a collision with cattle/kangaroos/etc., I would think that there would be some benefit to having one in a head on collision, provided it is mounted properly.
  • tonychrystonychrys Member Posts: 1,310
    "I would think that there would be some benefit to having one in a head on collision, provided it is mounted properly. "

    Be very, very careful with this statement. Read any instructions that come with these things and there will be a disclaimer saying otherwise.

    The reason is this: The PF uses a unitized body/frame construction, meaning that the body and frame is essentially one piece. They do this to provide better handling, ride, and most importantly, for safety reasons. Because there is no underlying ladder frame (like in a true truck design), they can design the unitized body frame to have crumple zones and control (to a certain extent) how it will react during a crash. The bumpers are an integral part of this equation and are attached to the unitized body at key points to distribute force.

    Front Grille guards attach to holes already drilled into the body for cosmetic add-ons (usually light bars). The designers did not take into account that these mount points would be used to distribute force. In the case of a significant head-on collision, the grille guards on a PF are like chicken soup: They won't hurt the situation, but at the same time they won't help.

    True kangaroo bars on a LC do help because I believe the LC uses a ladder frame design and the bars are there to specifically take a small amount of impact.

    Drew, am I pretty much on target? It's been awhile since I looked into this?
  • pathstarpathstar Member Posts: 201
    Just a correction to a previous post of mine. The lurch does not appear to occur in 2WD, only in AUTO mode. Thanks to all for calming my fear of this expensive transmission failing. I suspect the lurch is caused by the front/rear clutch -engaging- in preparation for "normal" (non-auto) operation (I say this as it is disengaged normally in AUTO and engages when wheel slip is detected, however, it is engaged in 4WD and probably in 2WD as well, with gears disengaging the front drive). As far as whether fuel economy may be better in 2WD than in AUTO, I have further "evidence" pointing to better mileage in 2WD. The vehicle seems to have faster response. It also will spin the rear tires very easily on our recently "glacier receeded" roads with sand and fine gravel on them. This surprized me. I didn't realize the AUTO was working so well!
  • goose1207goose1207 Member Posts: 113
    Phil47: I noticed you mentioned something about a steep driveway in a past posting. Is there anything in particular that you do to increase traction when it's covered with snow? I've used auto, 4hi, and 4L. 4L seems to work the best for me although there have been a few times where I couldn't make it. Have you found any product to be better than another in terms of melting snow, ice? Thanks.

    Originally, I wanted the sherwood green but since my dealer couldn't locate one, they got me my second choice, the sierra silver. I like this color alot but I have seen a couple of white PFs and I think this color is really sharp on the PF (not too big on white on most other cars though). My previous PF was super black and it was a pain to keep cleaning and shiny. The interior was tan cloth and I found it to show up fingerprints and dirt very easily. I opted for the black leather this time around since it's a nice complement to the silver. Also, a black interior is much easier to maintain than a black exterior.
  • bgritzbgritz Member Posts: 139
    Phil,

    I am in the same boat as you, lot of going between 2&4, and varied driving conditions. I seem to average about 1.5 mpg better or so. even if not, I have to admit I like the engine sounding a little more throaty. :)

    Denver oxygenates their fuel during the winter for pollution, so economy goes down regardless. They should begin to go back to "real" gasoline soon and I"ll kepp a closer eye on it.

    Brian
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.