Dodge Dakota - Quad Cab

13132343637101

Comments

  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Marl, stick with the 3.55 differential for your particular needs. Stay with the part time 4WD system especially since you will be using it only when you need extra tractive effort. Do yourself a favor, and get the limited slip differential. It
    is well worth having. It is not a locker but offers increased tractive effort in both 2WD and 4WD. I cannot answer why the Taco ma is rated higher, but so is the Dakota Club cab. It has to do with the GVWR in which the weight of the truck (empty) and the weight of the driver (150 bbs) is factored in. The payload (cargo, trailer, etc.) is established after the empty vehicle and driver (150 bbs.) are deducted from the GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating). The Regular Cab is rated even higher as again, the base truck is lighter.
    The Quad Cab has 4 front hinged doors that fully open on an independent basis. That did it for me.
    You will love this truck. Good luck.

    Bookitty
  • txqc2000txqc2000 Member Posts: 121
    The 510's are great. I have the driving light version (super white bulbs). In order of diminishing margins of illumination, they offer very, very white and bright illumination/coverage from just below where the headlights shine, all the way to just below where the high beams shine -- at least the way I have them pointed. They offer some illumination on the sides, though not nearly as much as a fog light would. If you need foglights, go with the dichroic bulb version.

    As far as fit goes, you may need to buy the bracket that PIAA makes specifically for the 510/Dakota application. It is a 90 degree shaped bracket that attaches perfectly to existing holes in the Dakota bumper and aligns with the existing foglight holes (or in my case, the ones that I had cut out). I don't recall the specific part no. for the bracket off-hand but it can be found at PIAA's website. You need to look under the application guide and it will tell you to use this bracket when mounting the 510's on a Dakota. Lastly (sorry for the long post), most PIAA dealers don't stock this part, but if you call a 4x4 place in CA. called "Dirty Parts" 310-390-9086 and talk with Larry the owner, he should have them in stock.

    Hope this helps.
  • steve234steve234 Member Posts: 460
    Go with the 3.92. You can haul a lot more and it will burn rubber but not gas. If you haul the jeep on a trailer, it could add well over a 1000 lbs to the weight and then add a few gee gaws, etc. I pulled my 4800 boat with the Quad and the 3.92 gears made a huge difference.
  • merlhmerlh Member Posts: 8
    steve234...
    Do you have any idea what the gas mileage difference is with the 3.92 vs. the 3.55? If it's 15mpg vs. 16mpg that'd be fine, but if it's like 12mpg vs. 16mpg... over the life of the vehicle that becomes significant. Thanks for all the input so far, keep it coming!

    Merl, Tejas
  • scottieeckscottieeck Member Posts: 69
    very pretty/handsome truck. I hadn't considered a grill guard before but now I'm wondering if I can weasel them into a valentines gift.
  • scottieeckscottieeck Member Posts: 69
    merl, I live in the northeast, a fair amount of inclement weather, I have the full time awd system and am not sure I would recommend it for someone in my area let alone someone from the south. I have had no problems with it, but it doesn't seem to make much sense if it's not really necessary.I would definitely go with the LSD. Good luck!
  • carls5carls5 Member Posts: 62
    Merlh, I have a 4X2, 4.7l, auto with T&H package and the 3..92. I have around 12K and I am getting aroung 14.9 around town, 17.5 highway. I currently tow a 3500# boat and could probably have gotten by with the 3.55 but I wanted the security of the 3.92 and the extra umph going up a ramp. Plus if want to tow anything else up to 6100# I am config to do it. I guess it comes down to a matter of choice and what you are going to be towing but to me the extra couple of MPG just wasn't worth it. Good luck in whatever you decide on.
    Carl
  • snowcountrysnowcountry Member Posts: 15
    I have a 3.92, 5spd 2WD LSD

    Tow a 19 foot travel trailer (4000lbs) plus a 12 foot cartop boat on the roof.

    1) The actual ratio depends also on tire size - I have 235's and finished ratio is almost identical to the 215's and 3.55 ratio when in 4th and 5th gear
    2) I tow in fourth gear, cruise on and it can handle up to 7% grades with no problem at 60MPH - it is utterly effortless.
    3) Don't forget 1st gear - you spend a lot of time backing up too, and it's essential to have a gear ratio that allows you to creep along without riding the clutch and start from a dead stop
    4) LSD? It snows here . I can't imagine driving without it. I don't really notice the LSD any other time - I think thats a good sign?
    5) RPM at 60 mph - all of 200rpm difference to the combinatrion of 3.55 and 235 tires
    6) mileage is dependent upon your throttle foot,since the truck goes like hell resist the urge to boot it when in second and third gear - the response is phenomenal!
    7) Yea the Toyota is rated higher, but you will run the bag off it trying to keep up with traffic. I used to tow with a japanese 3.0 litre six, it sucked. Can't beat cubic inches.
    8) Buy a Toyota - what l kind of patriot are you? Lenin was right, when it comes time to hang the western capitalist it will be another western capitalist that sells us the rope.
  • mtrogstadmtrogstad Member Posts: 21
    Hello everyone,

    I just graduated from college, so I thought I would treat myself to a brand new C. I have been dreaming about it for so long.

    Anyway, I am just a week or two away from ordering my C. I have been researching the AC options alot, and have read almost every post on this forum. However, just like merlh, I need a little advice to finalize my decisions about a few options.

    I am looking to buy a fairly loaded (minus power seats and leather) patriot blue AC, 4X4, 4.7 V8, auto, I&H.

    To make it shorter, here are my questions:

    1. I will mainly be snow drift jumping up here in North Dakota, rather than real offroading. Is it still a good idea to get the skid plate group?

    2. Is it possible to mount tow hooks in the two holes in the lower front facial?

    3. From everyone's comments, it sounds like the 4-wheel AS and LSD are the only way to go for a glacial environment. Does anyone disagree?

    4. The only towing I am planning for is a 14' speed boat a couple times a year. Is it still a good idea to go for the 3.92 ratio?

    5. Has anyone had good luck/recommend the optional security alarm?

    6. I am leaning toward the slide in plastic bed liner over the spray in. Just because of durability and possible removal? Any comments?

    7. Is it possible to use an after market CD changer with the factory deck changer controls?

    8. When is the heavy duty service group recommended?

    9. Is there actually two types of transmissions?
    a) 2WD/4WD
    b) AWD/4WD
    What are the differences?

    Sorry this was so long. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
  • tuvtesttuvtest Member Posts: 237
    not sure what you mean by AC, but since the "A" and "Q" keys are so close I'm assuming you mean QC. If thats the case, Good choice. You'll find plenty of us old timers willing to help out the younger gen. On to the ?'s
    1) If snow drifts are the extent of your 4-wheeling, the skid plates are probably a luxury rater than neccessity. There has also been some talk of oil changes being more difficult with the plates.
    2)Anything is possible. Dodge put the cutouts there, but haven't followed up with the hooks as an accessory yet. The ones listed for 2000 do not work. If you know someone who's good with metalwork/welding, brakets could be fabricated. I know on no kits on the market now that bolt in.
    3)ABS & LSD are good ideas for any enviroment, not just those of us in the arctic. They enhance vehicle control and safety, and some insurance co. even discount for ABS.
    4)Without knowing the weight of what you're towing this is only a guess, but it sounds like you would be well within the truck's limits if oyu went with the 3.55's
    5) I have the alarm,and personally I prefer to have a factory optional alarm that is designed as part of the truck rather than an aftermarket on that is modified to fit, possibly needing to mess with the trucks wiring/body. It's not fancy, but it does the job. anyway if the crooks are pros they'll just hook up a tow truck to it anyway, and no alarm will stop them.
    6)This is a topic with many opinions on both sides. I have a spray-in and I'm happy with it, and the several others I've had in the past. Others here feel the same way about the slid-ins. You need to look at the +/- of each and your use/situation and decide which is best for you.
    7)There is currently a discussion on this going on in Accessories group regarding this topic
    8) Absolutly. If you are towing at all, it is a good investment. In fact it's so important that if you go with the factory tow pkg. (recommended) Dodge makes it manditory.
    9) the transmissions are all the same. It is the transfer cases that change.
    2wd-none
    4wd- part time switchable case offers 2wd,4wd hi and lo
    AWD- full time 4wd. I'm not sure if hi and lo are both available
  • steve234steve234 Member Posts: 460
    I was getting 16.5 mpg average before the nasty weather set in. There have been several QC owners that report 20's with the 3.92. Look at it this way, you are getting less than a 10% rpm change. So you will be doing 2200 rpm instead of 2000 (as an example). This is not a significant change, but with any load on the truck, it will get the engine into the more effective power range. I have found that sometimes if your gearing is too high, a truck will burn more gas with any load on. Every combination is different, but I doubt that you would see a 1 mpg different between the two ratios.
  • merlhmerlh Member Posts: 8
    Went for another test drive, one 2wd w/3.55 and normal sized tires and one 4wd with the larger tire package and the same 3.55 ratio. I had noticed during my first test drive that the 4WD didn't pack quite the same oomph as the 2WD but didn't realize why at the time. It finally hit me after the second test drive... it's the tire size isn't it!? The larger sized tires on the 3.55 axle will reduce the effective gear ratio. So since I'm going with the larger tires I figure I should also go with the 3.92 axle ratio. I wonder, the gas mileage figures on the sticker... do they reflect the estimate given the standard axle ratio and standard sized tires reguardless of what the truck is equipped with?

    Next question: Extended warranty, need it?
    The last Chrysler product I owned was a '72 Plymouth Valiant so I'm somewhat unfamiliar with quality and longevity of the modern vehicles. Input appreciated.

    Thanks for all the help,
    Merl, Tejas
  • davids1davids1 Member Posts: 411
    You'll typically notice less "oomph" with a 4wd versus a 2wd. There are more moving parts, gears etc. which leads to more friction.
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Merl, it is difficult for me or anyone to determine what you need and/or expect from your vehicle. First off, you are correct in your recognition of the larger peripheral tire versus the smaller one. Also, a 2WD with its fewer components (drag and weight) would be a bit quicker given the same engine, transmission and rear axle ratio. I opted for the larger tires and the 3.55 LSD coupled to the 4.7 and the 5 speed, because it delivered greater mileage and kept the RPM down in cruising situations. I have a very heavy duty utility trailer which I tow on occasion and it is barely noticeable. When I ordered this vehicle, the ordering manager and my salesperson put their heads together (creating 1/4 brain) and ordered the vehicle with 3.92 rears without notifying me. The idiots saw a restriction come up on the computer and weren't savvy enough to realize that it was a "material restriction" involving a shortage of 3.55 LSD units, and thusly amended the order. This was a famous forum topic for some time. I refused delivery. The dealer (now I was working with the truck sales manager who was great) re-ordered the truck and gave me a sweetheart deal on an extended warranty (7 year 75K maximum care) with a $100.00 deductible. I had planned to purchase an extended warranty, so this was an added value for me. Which takes us to your next question.

    It would seem to me, with all of the expensive and sophisticated components used on today's modern vehicles, that an extended warranty
    would prove a prudent investment. Like any other underwritten insurance policy, one hopes never to have to invoke it, but it certainly generates a comfortable feeling. There are also various other aftermarket choices for extended warranty beside OEM. Merl, it's your money and ultimately your decisions, but I trust that this input will help. Good luck.

    Bookitty
  • martink98martink98 Member Posts: 6
    Does anyone have the factory mounted CD Changer in their Quad? If so where is it located? What are the dimensions? If Dodge can mount it I can too...

    Can't go the center console route because I have a bench seat.

    TIA
    Martin
  • ohc_babyohc_baby Member Posts: 116
    The only place for a changer in the Quad (and I'm about to do this myself, too) is under the driver's side rear seat. Not the area under the cushion, but against the back wall under the seatback - more or less where the jack is, but on the other side. You can only fit the compact 6-disc, but it's a real discreet and well-protected spot.
  • hogger4hogger4 Member Posts: 29
    Having purchased my '01 Quad Sport 4x4 two weeks ago, I decided to check tire pressures. As usual, I found each tire had air pressures above the factory recommended 30 pounds. I say as usual, because the 2000 Jeep Cherokee I purchased January 2000 also had tire pressures at least 10 pounds above factory specified settings. If you have recently taken delivery of an '01, check your tire pressures ASAP. You might be surprised!
  • bpeeblesbpeebles Member Posts: 4,085
    Be careful here!!

    The larger tires better have nearly 40PSI in them for highway use. It is in the owners manual and all over the news reciently (Ref Firestone)

    The numbers on the door pillar are for a SMOOTH ride.

    Using the Higher PSI will give you better MPG, steering response and longer tire life. I beleive that the MAX PSI on the tire sidewall is often recommended for LT tires.
  • mailman54mailman54 Member Posts: 111
    Bpeebles: Can't agree with you on this one. Maximum tire pressure on sidewall is not the pressure you should be using! You may get marginally better gas mileage, but at the expense of ride, handling and tire wear. Maximum tire pressure will cause the center of your tire to wear down faster than the rest.

    Mailman
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Tire pressures are configurated on trucks (as well as most automobiles) to accomodate GVWR. The more load (and that includes passengers) the higher pressure rating within the spectrum of allowable pressure. Maximum pressure on an unloaded vehicle can increase center tire wear, produce a bouncy ride, and under some conditions cause the driver to lose some control by bouncing to the side ("gandy dancing"). Usually the operators manual provides insight to some pressure rating alongside the pressure rating on the door. If you follow the manufacturers recommendation for tire pressure, you should be okay. I usually over inflate the tires slightly to cover any additional weight that I might encounter.

    Bookitty
  • mulderigmulderig Member Posts: 31
    On My 01 QC with the tire & handling group the tire pressure according to D/C should be 30 psi front and rear. 35 psi in the rear tires if hauling a load.
  • badassbobbadassbob Member Posts: 78
    I have 40psi in my 31x10.50's right now since i took delivery... When i went to sign papers, i noticed the tires bulging out from the weight of the truck during the walk-around and checked them out....29psi in all 4....I immediately made them take it to the back and put 35psi in all of them before i would even get behind the wheel...

    And after reading the owners manual, upped the pressure again because the 31's should have 40psi "if mostly driven at highway speeds" according to the tire chart in the info packet...

    In my opinion, 30psi in the 31's is WAY TOO LOW for a truck of this weight and will cause them to run ALOT hotter at normal driving speeds (45-70mph) not to mention the worse gas mileage, added Sidewall Flex and possibly unEven tire wear on the outside edges... 30psi should be used only if you need X-TRA traction at LOW Speeds (ie. BeachSand, Snow, RockCrawling, pulling a boat out of the water on a slippery ramp...etc) ..

    I will concede that 40psi DOES give a slightly harsher ride and will cause the rear end to hop slightly around bumpy curves and railroad tracks, BUT, this is easily resolved by adjustig driving habits (ie. Slowing down for bumpy curves and not jumping railroad tracks)...

    Personally i would NOT take this truck to highway speeds for any length of time with only 30psi in the tires...AND i would not Hot-Rod around long sharp curves @ 30psi either because of the extreme sidewall Flex with a low-pressure tire with the height of the 31's...I feel that 34-35psi is the absolute MINIMUM for the 31's with normal driving conditions on a truck of this size/weight loaded OR unloaded...

    Remember, Believe it or not, this is a TRUCK and NOT a Cadillac or a Corvette...(Despite the good ride and the awesome power!!!!)

    Once again this is My 2 cents and each one will have to read the charts and apply his/her own judgement... All i can offer is that My family and I ride on 40psi at all 4 corners....

    Enjoy and feel free to Disagree...

    CHAD......Greensboro, NC
  • bpeeblesbpeebles Member Posts: 4,085
    badassbob For actually reading my append
    I guess my reference to the OWNERS MANUAL was not seen by some appenders.


    If you want to risk losing the tread on the 31 inch tires... run 30 PSI on the highway!!
  • mtrogstadmtrogstad Member Posts: 21
    After months of dreaming, I am finaly going to order my new quad tomorrow. Thanks for the input on my option questions awhile back.
  • zidctlrzidctlr Member Posts: 46
    What is the largest size of tire that you can put on the quad cab without having to do a suspension or lift modification?
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Mark, I'm certain that you do know about the Farm Bureau $500.00 discount coupon. In the event that you do not, click on this link. http://www.fb.com.
    Good luck and let us know what you ordered.

    Bookitty
  • tuvtesttuvtest Member Posts: 237
    I'm running 32x11.50-15's and had to do a little trimming on the inner plastic trim on the front wheel wells. This is one step larger than the factory offers. Unfortunatly Dodge doesn't give alot of leeway in upgrading tires.
  • zonkzonk Member Posts: 208
    I have 1550 miles on a '01 Sport+, 4.7L auto, 4x2, T&H package with the following observations: roaring noise for the first couple of miles (my old Blazer did the same), no pinging, clunking, or slipping during shifting. Ambient temps have been 15-50 degrees F. I still cannot disable horn honk when using the remote lock button; I have tried using the procedures outlined in both the Operator's Manual and those posted here. I am runing 30 psi in tires all around per insert in operator's manual (for full capability, I would put 35 psi in the rears.) My QC does pull to the left intermittently upon braking. Mileage - 19.75 on the highway, however, in the city I am lucky to get 14 mpg. Have gotten two tanks at 13 and one at 14, fixing to get another fillup later on. Anything I can do to boost this? What about the brake pull?
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Bill, as far as tire pressure, 30 seems low even on the smaller rubber. I usually carried 32-35 all the way around depending on the load. As far as the brake pulling, you might try a couple of hard brake applications (in a safe area) to see if they will seat. Also check rotors and stators visually to make certain that there is no foreign material (grease, etc.) present. If that does not work, it is time to visit the service department. Your MPG sounds okay, especially in light of the fact that you only have 1500 miles on the odometer and should get better as you reach break in. Auto transmissions do better on the road (lack of gear to gear resistance) and not as well in city traffic due to their nature and some power loss inherent in automatic transmissions (fluid torque couplings).

    Bookitty
  • mailman54mailman54 Member Posts: 111
    My 2 cents. Recommended tire pressure for both light and heavy loads for my truck, 00 2wd 4.7 R/C is 35 lbs. I have the 2wd tire and handling group. Maximum tire pressure for my P255/65R15 tires is 44 lbs. I would no more inflate my tires to 44 lbs than fly. On my tires the 35 lb pressure is recommended for light and heavy loads up to a sustained 75 mph. Only if driving over 75 mph at a sustained rate do they recommend raising tire pressure by 4 lbs. I realize the 4 wheel drive light truck tires have different recommended tire pressures, but nobody can convince me that you should use the maximum rated tire pressure for the tires. It would ride like an absolute rock! I have driven Dakotas for 10 years now and currently own both a 91 and 00 2wd models and have always used the recommended tire pressure of 35 lbs. I have not experienced any premature tire wear or blowouts caused by overheating and I lived in hot climates for a number of years (Oklahoma and California). By all means run whatever tire pressure that makes you feel good, but please don't recommend the maximum tire pressure on the sidewall.
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Jim, Amen!

    Bookitty
  • badassbobbadassbob Member Posts: 78
    I dont think anyone was reccommending the Max Pressure on the Sidewall....The only reason to reach that pressure would be to seat the tire bead on the rim when installing new tires...

    My comment was aimed toward the 31x10.50 tires and not the 255/65's....the 255's are passenger car tires if i remember correctly... 35psi should be OK for these low profile tires ..But just as well, NO-ONE will convince me that it is smart to run 30psi in a 31" tall tire underneath a vehicle this heavy at highway speeds or any continuous speed for that mater

    By NO MEANS was this thread meant to say it was Ok to run the max pressure on the sidewall

    I love disagreement..,,,

    CHAD, Greensboro-NC
  • cowtownaggiecowtownaggie Member Posts: 39
    I noticed you said that you were running 32x11.50-15 tires on your quad. I have a some questions for you . . .

    1) Do you have the standard size rim for your quad, or did you start w/ the 31-10.50's as original equipment?

    2) How much did the tires raise the truck. (I am intrested in how much height the axle was raised.)

    3) Did you have to put a lift kit on your truck to get the new tires to fit?

    The reason for the questions: I drive my truck on ranch roads & across pasture in west & sw Texas. I am forever scraping the 1st or 2nd skid plate on the truck. Mostly against 2/3rds buried rocks that stick up on our "usual" ranch roads. If I can get 2 - 3 in of heighth from the tires & and my standard sized rims w/ out a lift kit, I will be one happy camper.

    Thanx for your time,

    PDS aka: Cowtown Aggie

    Anyone else that can help answer my "burning question" of the month, please chip in w/ your experiences.
  • tuvtesttuvtest Member Posts: 237
    Unfortunately, the info I have probably won't make you camping much happier.
    1) I started with the 265/70R16 witch is the MY2001 equvilant of the 31's. My current rim size is 15x8.
    2)I have not measured the axle height, but since I only went up 1" in tire height, total height is only up .5" (in theory anyway).
    3) no lift was required, although some trimming was needed for clearance.

    I know BFGoodrich offers 33" All-Terrains in both 9.5 and 10.5" widths which may give you a bit more height, but I don't know how well they will fit in the wheel well. The narrower tire may clear. Unfortunately there are not alot of wheel options available for the Dak that take popular off road tire sizes (15")into account. Most are designed for street tires (16",17",etc.)
  • bobs5bobs5 Member Posts: 557
    2 month of ownership and 900 miles on the truck now.
    Gas mileage seems steady around 16 mpg.
    Still waiting for the "window regulator" part to arrive at the dealers in order to fix the drivers side rear window. When the part arrives, I will probably pick up a set of rubber mud flaps while at the dealer.

    I just noticed a slight run/drip in the paint on the drivers side rear door. It is not too noticeable unless the light is just right.

    The truck is an SLT model with "chrome bumpers and the gray spoiler up front" and "chrome rear bumper with gray inserts". When I mention "spoiler", it is the part below the bumper which houses the fog lights.

    My questions are:
    1-Should I bother to have the minor paint blemish looked at or live with it?
    2-Is paint covered by the warranty?
    3-Can the "gray spoiler" and "gray rear bumper inserts" be painted to match the body color?

    Thanks for any advice.
  • tuvtesttuvtest Member Posts: 237
    Factory paint defects should be covered. The questions arises though is it worth the trouble. If the blemish is in the clear top coat, It should be no problem to wet sand and buff it out. If it is in the bottom color coat, it is more difficult. Most dealerships do not have the expertise/talent to do GOOD bodywork. Some paint colors are hard to match especially metallics. I guess my advice would be if it you can live with it, leave it. If it bothers you, talk to your dealer/DC about having it fixed at a reputable paint shop.
    The bumper trim parts can be painted. Although, if I remember correctly they are a rough finish which probably would not look too good (or smooth) painted. You might look at getting replacement parts from a sport model that are smooth and have them sprayed to match.
  • mailman54mailman54 Member Posts: 111
    badassbob: Please read the last paragraph of post 1668 where maximum tire pressure was mentioned.
  • sparkgap101sparkgap101 Member Posts: 2
    With all the talk of changing tire size, I found a web site that has a excellent tool for this. It gives a lot of info: tire dimensions, tire size comparison, odometer error, etc. Check it out.
    http://www.dakota-truck.net/TIRECALC/tirecalc.html
  • schoonoverschoonover Member Posts: 8
    I am nearing the point where I will order my 2001 Quad 4.7, auto 4x4. I noticed that the 2000 4.7 is rated 5 hp higher than the 2001. Is this because of emissions changes or some other tuning change? I am also having trouble deciding on these options: skid plates, LSD diff, antilock brakes. Are skid plates really needed for guy who does 99% street driving..is it a disireable option for resale...and do they make oil changes harder? In what situations would a guy need an LSD diff? And last, most people assume 4 wheel antilocks are the best for "safety" reasons. If so, why would dodge not make them standard?....It what situation would or would not they be recommended? I would appreciate any and all comments. Thanks
  • bobs5bobs5 Member Posts: 557
    I believe the bottom color coat has this blemish.
    Probably not worth going through all the trouble having it sanded down and painted.
    It is small, and i only noticed it after 2 months of ownership.
    Guess I'll wait till the first wash and wax to see if there are any more blemishes and decide then.
    The dealership has a seperate shop for body work and painting. I don't know how good their work is though.
    Thanks for your input about the bumpers.
    I can't really afford to buy replacement parts at this time. I will have to live with them for a while longer. The gray bumpers kinda gives the truck an unfinished look. At least the gray color goes through the material and seems to hide scratches. Found out when the snow shovel bumped into the rear bumper...oops.
  • bobs5bobs5 Member Posts: 557
    5 hp change is probably due to a tuning change for emissions purposes. (not positive)

    Skid plates- protects truck when offroading. Probably gets in the way when changing oil, only 950 miles on mine so I don't know yet. Probably get the option cost back in resale. I figured it was cheap insurance for the times I go camping in remote areas.

    LSD diff- This is the first time I had a truck with the LSD diff.
    It helps tremendously for getting initial momentum in snow and mud conditions without having to go into 4x4 mode.

    Antilock brakes- This is a new feature for me. I like them. It definitely helped me a few weeks ago while driving to work. I hit a patch of ice while making a turn, ABS activated, no sliding at all while still had the ability to steer. The brakes feel like an absolutely normal system until a lock up is detected and the ABS engages.
    Some people claim the ABS is not good for hard-core offroading.
  • victxvictx Member Posts: 108
    I started out with the factory 265-70-16 with the T&H package on my '01 Quad Cab 4x4. I upgraded to 265-75-16 on the same factory rims. There is no trimming required at all, but I do sometimes notice that when parked there is not much clearance to go any bigger without starting to rub or require trimming.
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Thank you sparky. Very handy.

    Bookitty
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Norm, to address your questions, the 4.7 was derated slightly to meet emission standards. Skid plate are a relatively inexpensive item, but offer undercarriage protection not only for offroad conditions, but also for snow and ice (I had a chunk of ice tear a hole in my oil filter in OH a few years ago). They do indeed complicate oil/filter changes and need to be wiped off, but I would not order a truck without them. Limited slip differntial keeps 2WD vehicles from becoming 1WD models and 4WD vehicles from becoming 2WD. LSD increases safety and performance in rain, snow, ice, loose gravel and dirt and is a viable and important option. Don't leave home without one. Four wheel ABS is not an option that I would choose, but a lot of people swear by it. Perhaps you might get some other opinions especially since ABS and full time 4WD are (in my humble opinion) not worthwhile as far as I am concerned.
    Good luck with your truck, and consider all options carefully, because it is far better to order them now, as opposed to field installing them later.

    Bookitty
  • ferousferous Member Posts: 226
    tuvtest - my '00 quad is the same SLT/color as yours. I love the two-tone look the grey & silver gives from front to back. I don't have to worry about stone chips in the paint on the facia which is important 4 years from now.

    ABS - GOT TO HAVE IT. This is the second vehicle I have bought with ABS, and I wouldn't go without it. We had the snowiest December in recorded history. The whole month the roads were covered in packed snow & ice. My ABS kicked in several times a day, and I have really grown to love.

    LSD - GOT TO HAVE IT. Same reasons as above.

    Tire PSI - For 10 years I have only run my tires with the max PSI. I have never bounced off the road and I am yet to ware out the center of the tires before the edges do. I have 20,000 miles on my truck and have kept 44 PSI the whole time. The tires look great (just did the second rotation).
  • iowabigguyiowabigguy Member Posts: 552
    I have a 2K quad SLT in light driftwood. I also feel the gray plastic leaves an unfinished look and does not blend well with my paint> I too considered having it painted to match. My research disclosed the painted (Sport) and unpainted (SLT) versions are made of entirely different "plastics" If I recall the painted version is ureathane and the unpainted is similar to polyethylene. The characteristics of the unpainted version do not lend themselves to long term adhesion of paint. I am not in the painting profession so I have to take the word of body shop professionals and they have recommended not attempting to have it painted. I had discovered an alternative I considered before I decided to live with the unfinished look. There is an advertiser in Trucking magazine that has metal replacement piece that is triple chromed and looks like a factory part (in the pictures) right down to the fog light openings. Hope this helps
    Rick
  • bookittybookitty Member Posts: 1,303
    Okay Rick, so who is this advertiser? If you find it, please post the information. Thanks and have a happy and healthy new year.

    Bookitty
  • ohc_babyohc_baby Member Posts: 116
    For 2000 the Federal 4.7s had a single cat at the collector. The 2000 Cali and now ALL 2001 4.7s have an extra pair of cats just behind the exhaust manifold. These new mandatory cats are responsible for the 5 horses.
  • ayrowayrow Member Posts: 99
    ABS brakes are perhaps one of the most dangerous inventions that I have encountered on an automobile.

    Why? I grew up in the Chicago area and was raised the learn to drive in the snow. One of the things that must be learned to the point where it is a reflex is pumping the brake pedal in order to maintain steering in slick conditions. I do it without even thinking about it.

    Now, where ABS is concerned, if somebody, like myself, were driving an ABS equiped vehicle and "pumped" the brakes as I described, the computer would become very confused and react strange enough to cause panic situation. I've experienced it on my '99 Rodeo and it's not fun.

    However, my biggest complaint with ABS is the following:

    Road&Track did a study on the different types of brakes and found that locked-up tires (ie. slamming on the brakes) will stop a vehicle much quicker than one equiped with ABS. Even on ice.

    Even the pumping brakes technique managed to stop a vehicle quicker than ABS since there is still sufficient lock-up.

    For the average Joe, new driver, or people located on warmer climates, ABS would probably prove a good addition to vehicle safety.

    However, I am staying as far away from it as I can for my own safety and comfort.

    I just ordered my 2001 QC about 3 weeks ago and, no, it does not have ABS.
  • ohc_babyohc_baby Member Posts: 116
    I agree with you in not liking ABS, but you still get rear-wheel ABS on your truck, like it or not. The one thing I find more laughable than people looking at ABS as the save-all of car safety is predictive traction control. Modern traction control, like on Subaru, applies brake pressure just before the wheel is expected to slip - ditto with their ABS system. If you put on better tires, you'll never come near their traction threshold before the computer spoils your fun...
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.