GM News, New Models and Market Share

1207208210212213631

Comments

  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    Can't say that I'm surprised.
  • smarty666smarty666 Member Posts: 1,503
    edited May 2010
    Very interesting article man. I have an Aunt and Uncle who have bought Saturn's for the last 10 years, despite the fact they have had many repairs to keep them going. Both of there Saturn Vue's are about 4-5 years old now so I'll be interested to see what they get, now that they can't get Saturn's to replace them, in a couple of years from now. I suspect they'll go back to Buick or get a Chevrolet!

    I think this would have looked much better for GM's division structure:

    Chevrolet: Mainstream brand across the board
    GMC: Mainstream professional brand
    Cadillac: Luxury Division
    Pontiac: Sport Division (enthusiast driving division)
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    I'd have to agree with that, but surely you know that for every Pittsburgh there are 100 cases that have turned out worse. I grew up in a small (under 10K) town with heavy industry that provided living wages for a lot of folks for decades, just 60 miles north of Pittsburgh. Most all of the industries are gone now. The results? Doesn't take Einstein to figure it out. NAFTA was the last nail in the coffin there.

    What is it that Pittsburgh did right that provided their renaissance? Is there something that other cities can do to emulate this?
  • greatlakesjrgreatlakesjr Member Posts: 109
    My wife and I just bought a new travel trailer last week. We bought the model we wanted from a local dealer. I could have bought it from a wholesale dealer a few states away for a few thousand less even with delivery fees, but I believe in supporting local businesses when I can. That said, I still made a few other dealers unhappy because I spent time with them looking over their models and negotiated prices and still went elsewhere. I'm sure they're not happy I bought from a competitor, but I can't make everyone happy.

    I hear you. While shopping for my Sonata, I spread my search radius to about 250 miles away. When I found my rock bottom price out of state, I called the local dealer and asked if he could match it. Couldn't even come close. Another in-state dealer about 90 minutes away came within $500 and my wife and I agreed to suck that up and go with it until he called back and said a mistake was made (I think he was being honest) and it was the wrong color. He had the color we wanted but it came with a special wheel package that put it $1500 over our low price. Wasn't going that route so we went out of state and made the purchase (but still paid home state, Michigan, sales tax). For the most part, I ultimately have to do what is good for greatlakesjr.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,054
    edited May 2010
    I remember hearing that when Oldsmobile went away, most of their buyers defected to Hyundai! That would probably make sense, as the only really popular Oldsmobiles in the last 10 years or so of their existence were the Cutlass Ciera (a solid seller from 1982 through 1996) and then, in the later years, the Alero.

    Around the time Olds got phased out, Hyundai was making larger and more impressive cars that were still a good value, and were a suitable replacement for something like an Alero or Ciera. I think the Achieva was actually a tolerable seller for a few years, but a lot of those went to rental fleets...not that the Alero and Ciera didn't! I had a green Alero coupe as a rental once. I thought it was a pretty nice car. Even if it was just a re-skinned Grand Am, which itself was just a re-skinned Malibu, the Alero just seemed like a lot more car. Nice style, and, dare I say, a decent interior!
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    edited May 2010
    Very interesting article man. I have an Aunt and Uncle who have bought Saturn's for the last 10 years, despite the fact they have had many repairs to keep them going. Both of there Saturn Vue's are about 4-5 years old now so I'll be interested to see what they get, now that they can't get Saturn's to replace them, in a couple of years from now. I suspect they'll go back to Buick or get a Chevrolet!

    My inlaws had a Saturn and they ended going to Toyota. My MIL has 120k miles on her '05 Camry XLE v6 w/o a single issue (100k on first set of brakes and she commutes into downtown Chicago). I'm guessing they will be staying with Toyota. My last chat regarding the Camry with my FIL was how he'd never owned a car that had been that reliable. Her '95 Saturn required something major every year, leaked oil, leaked trans fluid, and on and on. Don't see them going back to GM unless they buy something used on the cheap.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Just keeping it real. :shades:

    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    There is no reason to take anything related to GM personally. They are just cars after all.

    GM simply failed to make the best ones that customers would buy and failed. Change that and they will prosper.

    Now, back to the better sports car. Genesis!



    Regards,
    OW
  • skeezixskeezix Member Posts: 45
    Genesis, a sports car????? I think that's more than a stretch. I like the Genesis, but don't call it what it is not. I own what many people consider to be a sports car. It weighs about 3100 pounds, has 405 hp, 400 ft-lbs of torque and can get up to 30 MPG on the hiway and it was built by GM. It is an '03, but even today, many manufacturers cannot match this car's performance that I have enjoyed for almost 8 years. With all the bashing going on, I'd like to think that someone can see that GM offers great performance options that are flat lacking from many other manufacturers.
  • bpraxisbpraxis Member Posts: 292
    The new Camaro has terrific styling and the Vette is still an exciting car that I would enjoy owning. GM is at the bottom of the list in the Consumer Report reccomendations.

    Prospective buyers in the marketplace decide en mass that GM was not for them and bankruptcy and reorganization would have been the result.

    Instead Washington decided to spend over 50 billion dollars to keep this company on life support and rewarded bad performance at taxpayer expense..

    In order for society to prosper economic resources must be reallocated to their most efficient use in the most capable hands. Make way for the new carmakers.

    While I would love to see GM be a huge success again the market must be allowed to work.

    Socialism or corpratism in this instance punishes:

    1. Hard Work

    2. Thrift

    3. Entrepreneurship

    It punishes the good for being good and rewards bad perfromance and behavior.
  • dave8697dave8697 Member Posts: 1,498
    The Bailout of GM and Chrysler:
    it boiled down to union VS non-union.
    Obama wants all gov't employees to be unionized, gain power, bleed the US coffers dry (Follow Greece's lead) and put the entire country into insurmountable debt. Suprised that he backs auto unions too, who were devoted to his election???

    I am being told in news that I should change my way of living to help avoid Gulf oil spills. My latest efficient addition to my family is a 4 cyl. I've only put an average of 90 miles a week on it. Don't shut down an oil well because of me yet.

    Lots of new homes being built and moved into by me. Suprising number of Grand Prixs, Trailblazers and Buicks among the new homeowners. Odyseys are now matched in quantity by Buicks within the houses near mine. I think there are 2 new Camaros, but unfortunately they are a couple of streets away.

    GM is at the bottom of the list in the Consumer Report reccomendations.
    I put them at the top. I couldn't have got a Sentra or Corolla for what I paid for my Malibu.

    Other cars considered before getting a Malibu: Used CTS, new G6, new Cobalt and G5. new Fusion, new Impala, and used Lucerne, all in the $13-26k range.

    60 billion in unemployment avoided by the auto bailouts. If the bailout payback wasn't accomplished by dilluting the current stock, there would have been a good story to tell. But then all money paid back is planned to be spent frivelously again anyway, not put against the defecit.
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    Lots of new homes being built and moved into by me. Suprising number of Grand Prixs, Trailblazers and Buicks among the new homeowners. Odyseys are now matched in quantity by Buicks within the houses near mine. I think there are 2 new Camaros, but unfortunately they are a couple of streets away.

    I certainly haven't seen that in my neighborhood. Over the past 3 years I've seen more households continue to switch to foreign cars. When I moved here in '07 both my neighbors had domestic cars. Now, one of them has replaced their Ford Freestar and Chrysler minivan with a Toyota Highlander and Honda Odyssey. My other neighbor replaced a GrandAm with a new Corolla and a Chrysler Intrepid with a used Lucerne. The rest of the households have Lexus, BMW, a few Mercedes and of course Accords and Camrys. A house down the road has a new Genesis sedan that replaced an STS.

    I have also seen a few new Fords running around. As for new GM, I've seen a few Acadia's, Tahoe's, one STS. But overall GM still is falling behind and sales numbers from April still show that. Only one GM vehicle in the top 10 sales list. Ford and Honda had 3. The Sonata seems to be taking off being at #9 and it was close to outselling the Fusion.

    Still surprising to see how many vehicles Toyota continues to sell considering their issues.
  • tbone_raretbone_rare Member Posts: 96
    I sell new Chevy's and Buick's. I can't disagree with you much about the GM division structure. I would have kept Chevrolet....Cadillac....and Pontiac. I find it hard to imagine Silverado's not being around anymore. No need for the GMC to go directly into competition with them. That pretty much brings it down to Buick and Pontiac. Pontiac pretty much had the younger demographic. Buick was primarily for the older customers. So far, Buick has come out with exciting vehicles with the new Lacrosse. The new Regal has some very good potential as well. They are going after the younger customers now and compare very well against the competition. However, the Pontiac division just needed a few tweaks to maintain its customer base.

    The fact be told, I would eliminate ALL divisions of General Motors. I have said for years that they need to make a GM vehicle. Instead of Chevy Silverado, make it a GM Silverado. Instead of Buick Lacrosse, make it a GM Lacrosse. Of course that will never happen......and maybe I'm not very smart......but it makes good sense to me!
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,054
    I guess one advantage of Pontiac was that it at least gave the Buick/Cadillac/GMC dealers an inexpensive car to sell. Even though Pontiac was selling poorly, it might have gotten customers in the door, who, even if they didn't buy a Pontiac, might have seen a Buick, Caddy, or even a GMC truck that they liked.

    I guess the case could be made for some smaller, cheaper, more entry-level Buicks, but I really hope they don't go that route. IMO, Buick is supposed to be an upscale car. Not a luxury car, necessarily, but still a step up from the likes of Chevy, Ford, Dodge, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, etc.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    It's more than $60 billion in unemployment compensation. Think of all the social ills that would result of such a massive amount of people out of work - a huge upsweep in violent street crime for one.
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    It's more than $60 billion in unemployment compensation. Think of all the social ills that would result of such a massive amount of people out of work - a huge upsweep in violent street crime for one.

    I don't buy that for a second!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Come to Philly or Detroit. It will become readily apparent! :surprise:
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    edited May 2010
    Come to Philly or Detroit. It will become readily apparent! :surprise:

    Detroit has been a dump for 30+ years.

    U.S. crime falls despite prolonged recession

    I'd be willing to bet the majority of the thugs your talking about never bothered to finish school or tried to acquire any type of gainful employment. Most ex-factory workers don't end up killing and pillaging.
  • xluxlu Member Posts: 457
    Still surprising to see how many vehicles Toyota continues to sell considering their issues.

    GM market share is still No. 1; Ford No. 2 and Toyota No. 3 and losing market share.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    edited May 2010
    new marketing slogan for Chevy

    link title

    image
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    GMI's take on "Annual deletions"

    link title

    Great writeup
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    It's more than $60 billion in unemployment compensation. Think of all the social ills that would result of such a massive amount of people out of work - a huge upsweep in violent street crime for one.

    Using that logic, the government should have spent about $500 billion bailing any company that was in trouble. Keep all of the jobs afloat. It would have reduced unemployment and cost less in the long run than the current alternative. :confuse:
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    If employment equaled law abiding citizens, companies wouldn't need a loss prevention department (9 times out of 10 it's employees that steel and harass). My wife just had an employee taken out in handcuffs the other day for stealing and he made over $140k last year.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    You're car costs over $50 large. The Genesis coupe is no comparison but it did edge out the Mustang and Camaro according to MT. :surprise:

    Regards,
    OW
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,956
    Still surprising to see how many vehicles Toyota continues to sell considering their issues.

    Not surprising at all since I'm aware of, (and also experienced 2nd hand) the legendary bullet-proof reliability of Toyota throughout the last few decades.

    I've seen the magical dependability of my Parents' early 90's 4Runner, '95 Camry, and 2001 Camry V6. My Dad's used Carmax Lexus ES has been great too in recent years. My older brother has stuck by Toyota with a T100, Tundra, Used Lexus BIG SUV (I think the GX), and now most recently a new Corolla (gas prices finally got to him).

    I don't get them because they are still appliances on wheels (albeit the most reliable appliances ever; and quite comfortable too, I can see why old people like them).

    These decades of proven and earned legendary status will not be trumped by comparatively trivial issues of recent months.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,956
    s more than $60 billion in unemployment compensation. Think of all the social ills that would result of such a massive amount of people out of work - a huge upsweep in violent street crime for one.

    Uh... Lemko, there's still a huge amount of people out of work right now, they just don't happen to be auto workers. Heck, the construction industry could of used a 60 billion dollar bailout more than the auto industry. I don't see a huge upsweep in violent crime. Are you suggesting auto workers are more violent than the current massive amount of unemployed people out there right now?

    All our government did was to choose to keep auto workers working, at the expense of other industries such as construction, retail, ect. There are just as many unemployed as there would have been if they hadn't bailed out the auto industry with 60 billion, and instead funneled that money to some other industry with high layoffs.

    The unemployment rates the media reports don't figure in the TRUE real amount of unemployed currently. They use a lot of games such as working 3 hours for the US Census suddenly makes you employed.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,054
    f employment equaled law abiding citizens, companies wouldn't need a loss prevention department (9 times out of 10 it's employees that steel and harass).

    Ain't that the truth! I used to work in a department store, one in a bad neighborhood, no less, and the majority of theft came from the employees. When I worked at Denny's, I remember one of the managers got fired for theft. I think they caught him loading a big box of frozen steaks into the trunk! And I remember the hostess telling me that if you steal from the drawer, make sure it's less than 50 bucks, because then they can't prosecute you and most likely wouldn't fire you. Real bunch of winners, there! :sick:
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    These decades of proven and earned legendary status will not be trumped by comparatively trivial issues of recent months.

    That definitely seems to be the case. I agree with your post, I haven't met anyone who hates their Toyota or Honda.

    GM OTOH is still in the opposite direction. A few good entries are not enough to offset years of bad offerings.
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    Heck, the construction industry could of used a 60 billion dollar bailout more than the auto industry. I don't see a huge upsweep in violent crime. Are you suggesting auto workers are more violent than the current massive amount of unemployed people out there right now?

    True. I've run into several laid off construction workers lately. They didn't try to harm me in anyway.
  • jae5jae5 Member Posts: 1,206
    edited May 2010
    Lots of new homes being built and moved into by me. Suprising number of Grand Prixs, Trailblazers and Buicks among the new homeowners. Odyseys are now matched in quantity by Buicks within the houses near mine. I think there are 2 new Camaros, but unfortunately they are a couple of streets away.

    That's good news in that it seems people are not falling into the same trap of those in the past where new home = need a new car.

    I put them at the top. I couldn't have got a Sentra or Corolla for what I paid for my Malibu. Other cars considered before getting a Malibu: Used CTS, new G6, new Cobalt and G5. new Fusion, new Impala, and used Lucerne, all in the $13-26k range.

    But this can also be looked at in terms of the GMs being out-dated or not up to the quality with the competition so they sell cheap. I mean, the Impala (I still consider this is nothing but a re-badged Lumina), Cobalt and G6 are long in the tooth and past their maturity stage, so why pay top dollar? I'm not going to pay steak prices for a hot-dog, even if it is an Oscar Mayer weiner. Also you have to factor in the "why buy a new GM when you can get a better deal buying a used one" in the case of the CTS (which I really like) & Lucerne. I think if it wasn't for Lemko, Buick would be long-gone :P

    Please don't take my comments the wrong way, not bashing but just stating what goes on with most, especially those of us who are currently trying to keep our GM iron going. ;)
  • jae5jae5 Member Posts: 1,206
    The unemployment rates the media reports don't figure in the TRUE real amount of unemployed currently. They use a lot of games such as working 3 hours for the US Census suddenly makes you employed.

    I found that a little "creative" as well a few weeks ago when the media were taking about the increase in jobs and the economy was "improving". Of the 162K increase, 40K-something were due to the Census. I was sitting there thinking, hmmm
    40K-something versus how many MILLIONS unemployed

    another 100K filing new unemployment benefits

    these Census jobs are very temp at best and most, if not all, are 3 ~ 5 hours/day

    how can the real economy be improving and people spending when everyone is in pay-off-debt / stay afloat mode? Thehn I remembered it's the rich economy they're talking about and us working stiffs don't count.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,054
    I found that a little "creative" as well a few weeks ago when the media were taking about the increase in jobs and the economy was "improving". Of the 162K increase, 40K-something were due to the Census. I was sitting there thinking, hmmm

    Another cute little "creative accounting" statistic that has been thrown around is how credit card debt is going down and people are saving more money.

    Well, credit card debt as a whole went down because the banks simply charged off a lot of bad debt that they knew they'd never get repaid. So yeah, total outstanding debt went down, but only because it was forgiven, rather than paid off. There are still plenty of people who are up to their armpits in credit card debt and living beyond their means and just making the minimum payments.

    And, I think one reason that people are saving more is because of strategic defaults. They know they're going to lose their house anyway, so why keep throwing money at the mortgage? So instead they might be saving more money, but they're also soon going to lose the roof over their heads and probably doom themselves to being renters for life.
  • ingvaringvar Member Posts: 205
    I haven't met anyone who hates their Toyota or Honda.
    I did and actually I had 1 Honda and 1 Acura and wouldn't drive Honda again.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,054
    I knew a married couple who had a 1994 Civic EX sedan that was pretty troublesome. Blew two head gaskets and needed a/c work within the course of 80-90,000 miles. They swore they'd never get a Honda again.

    They replaced it with a 1998 Saturn S series sedan, and around that time also got a new Windstall. Last time I saw them though, both had been replaced, with a 2003-2008 style Corolla and a Kia Sorrento, respectively.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited May 2010
    Heck, the construction industry could of used a 60 billion dollar bailout more than the auto industry

    Around here, there's so much road construction going on from the stimulus money, it's probably hurting productivity with the longer commutes. :shades:

    Back to GM, maybe this will help:

    GM's Docherty Swept Aside for Hyundai Marketing Whiz (AutoObserver)
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    edited May 2010
    HMM...Hey Lemko, LOOK WHO"S BLIND NOW!!!

    GM knows they are not firing on all cylinders ...just on about 3...Silverado, Equinox and LaCrosse.

    That's a blown engine in my book! :shades:

    They begged for the Hyundai Guy!! I really LOVE IT! :D

    Regards,
    OW
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Back to GM, maybe this will help:

    GM's Docherty Swept Aside for Hyundai Marketing Whiz (AutoObserver)


    That might be the smartest marketing move GM has made since the bailout!
  • greg128greg128 Member Posts: 546
    "Magical dependability" of Toyota vehicles.

    How about a 1989 Chevy Astro I owned and sold to a friend with
    360,000 miles and the original transimssion. (Motor replaced
    at 160,000 miles due to overheating. The motor from the junkyard
    cost $400 - it was cheaper than a head gasket) How about my
    son's 2000 Chevy Cavalier that he gave to his girlfriend still running
    strong at 180,000 miles with no major repairs. The purchase price
    was $10,500 new. I'd say that car was a good deal.

    And at least I have confidence that the spare tire and/or gas tank
    will not fall from the frame of my 2006 Chevy Silverado due to
    premature rust like they might on Toyota Tacomas and Tundras.
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    And at least I have confidence that the spare tire and/or gas tank
    will not fall from the frame of my 2006 Chevy Silverado due to
    premature rust like they might on Toyota Tacomas and Tundras.


    Yeah, but who knows when the fuel pump or trans will die, it can happen at any time. Over the weekend I was helping a camping buddy fix his sharp '96 Tahoe 2dr. It is in immaculate shape with 180k miles on it. But it's on it's 3rd trans and I had the honor of helping him put in it's 5th fuel pump, the one we replaced was only a year old. Not a fun job on a gravel lot. We had 6 guys standing around and all of us were talking about how we had a trans and fuel pump die in a gm 1/2 ton.

    Any time I talk to anyone regarding those late 90's through '00 1/2 ton GM truck or SUV, trans and fuel pump replacements come up more often than not. I thought the Chrysler minivan transaxles of the late 80's were bad. I'm beginning to think GM's 4l60E trans is right behind it in terms of being junk.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    edited May 2010
    Ewanick's replacement of Docherty comes a day after a highly publicized complaint was filed against GM with the Federal Trade Commission over its boast that it had paid its government loans in full, when the the government still owns a huge stake in the auto company.

    What? They blame her for that? Oh well, let the axe continue to be wielded. It ain't over 'till it's over. The Board and the Executive continues to BS their way along the bumpy and long road of dishonesty that paints the true picture of GM's reputation based on a huge ego but in reality is a weak example of good corporate governance.

    Tell me they knew nothing of this statement in the BoD! Go Ahead....Make My Day!

    By the way, Mr. Ewanik, the first coarse of business is getting rid of "May the Best Car Win!" because it reflects the arrogance that GM can not shake because they will never get it. You can't talk your way to customer loyalty with empty phraseology.

    You actually have to deliver...but you already have been there. Hyundai is steam-rolling the market at the moment. Nice work!! :shades:

    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    edited May 2010
    PS pumps, Alternators, trannys...Oh My! The Wicked Witch of Detroit strikes right on time. "Built to Fail" is GM's label on the parts bin in every dealer...err, except Buick of course! ;)

    Even the supplier of those notorious gas pedals that cause UA was called CTS!!

    Perhaps that's why CTS sales have tanked this year.

    Regards,
    OW
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    PS pumps, Alternators, trannys...Oh My! The Wicked Witch of Detroit strikes right on time. "Built to Fail" is GM's label on the parts bin in every dealer...err, except Buick of course! ;)

    No kidding, I was talking to all these guys at our campground. Many have bought 2-3 Chevy trucks over the past 15 years and many had the same repeat problems. Rear end noise, bad trans, and bad fuel pumps. I'm not that dumb. I had those troubles with one and didn't buy another.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Better marketing only works if you have better product. Otherwise any short term marketing results will only lead to long term problems and consumer distrust. I think this guy Ruess(?) is really working to improve product and quality even though he is the son of a former GM exec. If that's happening, a Hyundai type warranty might be a very good move. I think the current GM extended warranty is too limited with too many loopholes to really motivate or convert most buyers. A reinvigorated GM is really good for the competitive automotive market and the buyer, so I hope they succeed.
  • andres3andres3 Member Posts: 13,956
    I think the current GM extended warranty is too limited with too many loopholes to really motivate or convert most buyers. A reinvigorated GM is really good for the competitive automotive market and the buyer, so I hope they succeed.

    I completely agree with that. GM needs to move away from warranties like the LOOP HOLE riddled "lifetime" government backed warranties of Chrysler (short lived experiment), and towards substantial warranties that mean something like Hyundai's (that rewards new car buyers instead of used car buyers).

    Unfortunately for GM, their warranties (no matter what they choose to do with them) are also currently "government backed." Frankly, I wouldn't buy one because I don't want to burden my fellow tax payers with transmission and head gasket replacements prior to 65,000 miles.
    '18 Porsche Macan Turbo, '16 Audi TTS, Wife's '19 VW Tiguan SEL 4-Motion
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    I don't think GM is alone regarding the extended warranty past 36k miles. Lots of things are not covered. I ran into the same issue with my Expedition. I had a coil pack die at 56k or so. It was not covered under the 60k powertrain warranty. While the coil pack was not expensive, I got screwed on Ford's spark plug issue on the 5.4. It led to a $1k+ bill on a vehicle that was technically under warranty.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    edited May 2010
    And I have to say, there is a possibility that this will become my next GM car (as long as there is a manageable lease), and only my second new one since my lousy '94 Saturn.

    2011 Chevrolet Volt is ‘99 percent’ ready, in engineering speak

    It’s almost done.

    The 2011 Chevrolet Volt, now just months away from launch, is at the “99 percent level” of engineering calibration, a General Motors executive said on Tuesday.

    In plain English, that means the extended-range car is ready. The driving characteristics likely won’t change much; engineers are now just aiming for consistency to ensure that the Volt always drives as expected.

    “We’re really pleased with how they drive, how tight they are,” said Larry Nitz, GM executive director of hybrid and electric powertrain and engineering.

    Speaking via a conference call from a GM test-drive in California, Nitz said the car was hitting its targets.

    ......“It’s an EV that can drive across the country.”

    ......The 40-mile range on electricity is still expected, though Nitz declined to discuss mpg ratings.


    http://www.autoweek.com/article/20100504/GREEN/100509955

    The article goes on to dampen expectations that this thing will be even remotely sporty, and of course they have backed away from the 230 mpg estimated rating because for a vehicle like this, rating fuel economy in the same terms as gas-powered cars makes no sense. But as a commute car it would be just the ticket for me; I would probably burn less than 5 gallons of gas a week, so mabe 1/3 of what I burn now. For me the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions is just as important as, maybe more important than, the cash savings on gas purchases.

    I hope this thing is as good as GM has promised it will be for all these years. My experience with GM has been that it overpromises and underdelivers. For the sake of advancing powertrain technology, I hope that is not the case with the Volt. I can't wait to see this thing this fall.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • torque_rtorque_r Member Posts: 500
    edited May 2010
    GM market share is still No. 1; Ford No. 2 and Toyota No. 3 and losing market share.

    I don't have exact numbers, but Toyota sales increased about 25% in April, while GM increased about 7% or so. So if Toyota lost market share, then GM lost even more.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.