Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
That being said, I like the interior left of the radio. I agree with whoever said that that cheap plastic afflicts the console. And it's not even designed where one could dress it up with after market carbon fiber kits. Power is up but not what the concept had. But with 280lb torque and 250 horses, you'd have to be in the desert of Arizona to actually legally use it. More than enough for most driving situations.
All in all, I probably wouldn't get it, primarily because of that dash. I couldn't bear to look at that every day. But I do have my eye on the Chrysler Pacifica....
rjs200240, I'm glad someone other than me has brought up the point of the G35 being equally as "bizarre" looking as the CTS. I personally like the CTS alot and too think that the G35's front end looks like a watered down CTS's. And the rear looks like a cross between an Altima and a Corolla. Both cars are a break from their manufacturers traditional styling. And yes, the CTS has REAL not fake wood. From the improvements that look to be coming in 2004, the CTS will more than likely be the car that replaces my Intrigue. Unless I get tempted by a less than 2 year old STS with only 4K for under 30 grand. Despite the CTS's more nimble chassis and tighter handling, there is something about Northstar power that is tempting.
dbogey : What are you looking at now or do you think you will just hang on the the Intrigue?
Looks very bright and clean. Better than the grey IMHO.
The steering wheel has an almost art deco appearence. Reminescent of the Packard banjo style
spokes.
http://media.gm.com/
Stabili Trak, one piece body ring(like Impala)
car will be built in Oshawa.
Side curtain airbags, etc.
Looks like a winner.
Looks like it doesn't offer digital climate control.
Is the intrigue the only wbody that offers that?
Can anyone give me any help on this problem?
To me the CTS and G35 are like oil and water. The CTS is unattractive to my eye and the A&S interpretation on it is very poorly handled. The G35 is a very attractive and clean design (except, I admit, for the taillights. Nissan needs to hire a new designer just to do that because almost all of their cars have terrible taillight treatments). Caddy may be getting a lot of attention for the CTS but is it the kind of attention they want? A lot of people simply are turned off by the car. Unlike the Intrigue design at least, which was a notably clean and well-executed style.
Re. the 2004 GP: hard to understand why GM is releasing this now, so far in advance. Might not do much for sales of the 2003 models. The exterior looks fine to me, nothing revolutionary, but a clean evolution of the current style. The interior disappoints. Too disjointed. I don't care for the overlapping individual-look guages on a car in this segment, there are too many unrelated circular forms on the dash, just like my dad's old '78 Lemans; and what's with the irregular transition between top of the center stack and the top of the instrument cluster? Must be a very pre-production piece to have a large lip like that showing. But the gray is never a good choice for an interior, so maybe it looks better in tan - anyone have links to that?
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
The balancing doesn't help too much with horsepower but the blueprinting involves port matching.
They measure the ports on the intake manifold and on the heads and then make all the ports the same size as the largest port.
This alone can make 20-30 hp.
The ports will also line up better.
If you have ever watched any of the showroom stock races done by the SCCA all of the production based vehicles will have this done.
As you can guess an extra 15-20 or even 30 hp at the crankshaft on a car that is making 150-200 hp at the wheels, is significant.
Plus most of this power is on the top end so the car will really pull strongly above 3500 rpms.
Hope this helps.
http://www.cardomain.com/id/javidogg
ab348: I don't think auto manufacturers can legally sell a 2004 model in 2002. I think they have to wait until January of 2003. I believe that is what Cadillac did with the CTS early this year.
jg28 : I will reserve final judgment to when I see one in person. Pictures can be deceiving. All I can say for sure is that it's an improvement on the current model.
;-)
It is starting to have a few "funny" things now that it's two years old. Sometimes the low washer fluid light comes on when it shouldn't.And sometimes I have to turn the climate control off, then on again, to get ECON mode running.
I can ignore little things like that. But in a few days, I am going to take the car back to the dealership where I originally bought it, to try and get the steering lube and the headlight dimming fix.
The new tires feel better, but I still haven't had a chance to try them in an empty car.
oldsman : Do you usually have the radio on? I always turn mine off every now and again to listen for any noises the car might be making. Sounds like that's what you do also.
RE 04 Grand Prix : I see in this months Motor Trend that there will be a high performance GP with an all new ohc V8. All I can say is WOW.
(FYI-My Intrigue is a 2002 model)
The problem with the dimming lights is only on the 3.5 liter engines which were used in the Intrigues. The culprit is the "Air Injection Pump" that kicks on to add more air to the fuel injection system. This pump pulls 45-60 watts of power which then causes the lights to dim. There is no current fix for this problem but he said the last he knew, GM was looking at re-writing the program so that the pump doesn't kick on all at once and cause the lights to dim. He also said there is nothing to worry to about in regards to the lights quit working all together. Changing the alternator wouldn't help because my 2002 would already have the newest version! I mentioned back to him that I have actually had the car in front of me at night (driving on the highway) wave back at me because he thought I was flashing my lights at him and that wasn't good and he agreed with me on that. With that happening by being accidently in a bad section of some town could possibly cause some bad things to happen. I know I'm be a little melow dramatic there but anything is possible in the world we live in today!
I hope that this answer or lack of an answer helps everyone with the dimming light problem!
As for the "subsidy" comment... The US dollar has increased in value so much over the past 3 years that car makers can not pass on that change here or no one would buy cars anymore. You are talking about 10%! It's not only cars that are cheaper, almost everything is. When I go into Subway in Buffalo a small sub costs $3.89 US. In Canada, the price is the same but in Canadian $$. This means that sub really costs me almost C$6 in Buffalo which is outrageous IMO. My basic observation for most things (cars excluded) is that the price numbers are the same in the UK, US and Canada, only the currencies make thing here cheaper. I know this because when relatives come from Europe they go shopping crazy.
FX rate on car prices is between 1.4 and 1.5 here. The actual FX is now 1.6. I suspect in the years to come you will see the FX rate go back down and the car issue will die.
wbhall, seems I remember reading a past a while back that also linked the "flicker" to the AIR pump. I'm not sure that is my problem or not as when mine flickers(it's hasn't lately) it will do it over and over. Sometimes only seconds apart. I can't imagine the AIR cycling on and off that rapidly.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav
The cam timing appears to be different as well. The duration is listed for the 4.0, but not for the 3.5. However, the exhaust and intake centerlines are not the same. The intake and exhaust lift is the same. The valves are weird because of how they are listed. Here are the valve head diameters listed for the 3.5: Intake 36.2mm, Exhaust 28mm. Now for the 4.0: Intake 34.090-34.350mm, Exhaust: 27.880-28.140mm. I'm not sure why one is listed as absolutes while the other is listed as a range.
A little history of the 3.5 might explain a little bit. When the 3.5 debuted in 1999, the 4.0/4.6 were basically unchanged from the first Northstar (or actually Aurora, since Caddy stole it from Olds) V8. The 3.5 took that basic architecture and freshened it up. They didn't just lop off two cylinders. The 3.5 got coil-on-plug ignition and was able to run on regular gas. The intake was changed too (the 3.5 has a water-crossover in the intake path instead of having cooling hoses run to the throttle-body) It was the start of the redesign of the Aurora/Northstar V8s. It was more high-tech than the 1999 Northstar or Aurora V8. Then for 2000, the Northstar and Aurora V8's got updated. They too got coil-on-plug and a bunch of other stuff (quieter intake, lower emmissions, all sorts of things). The new Aurora and Northstars can run on regular gas too, but they have a 10:1 compression ratio instead of the 9.3:1 the 3.5 got. There were changes to the intake (the water crossover is different on the 4.0 than the 3.5) and the valves and many other things. I imagine they started with the changes made to the 3.5 and went from there. So the 3.5 is sort of an in-between from the old Aurora/Northstar and the new Aurora/Northstar V8's. At least that's my take on it.
Oh, also the 3.5 has a balance shaft which isn't needed in 90-degree V8's (as they can be naturally balanced).
i finally have mime replaced, tweeter and woofer; along with a sony head unit, a carver amp, a sony digital processor, a 10 disc sony cd changer and a 15" infinity woofer (disconneted my rear). I am in sonic heaven....
They do make a model that works through an RF modulator though (So you tune to a fixed FM frequency to hear the CD changer).
There are a tonne of head units out now that play mp3 cd's, maybe check out www.caraudioforum.com or epinions.com?
Intrigue is around 7.6-7.8 secs.
(other than sub)
The problem with 2001 is very common as it was why my dealer finally replaced mine. First they tried to tell me that they fixed the problem in 2000 and the 2001's didn't have the problem (mine also from day 1).
When he contacted gm they informed him that 2001's did have the problem and replaced the altenator. Worked for a week and then started up again, but to a lesser extent.
When I went it for the 3rd one he said some 2002 still are problematic. I suspect that they all do it, But most do not drive at night or just think like I did at first and thought I was just blinking, reflections on the road or going over bumps.
Buddy's story about the air injection pump is hooey and a diversion tactic from gm because they do not have a clue why or do not want to put up the investment to fix the problem. Need a few dead bodies where they can not blame it on driver error. ( firestone/ ford).
My lights flickered off and on several times, 4 to 5 , sometimes the whole car twitched or hesitated, like the tranny just slipped.
Watts or power is voltage times current, P=V*I. If the pump draws 65 watts then the current is a little more than 5 amps. If a car cannot supply 5 amps on demand then we are in real big trouble. The blower motor on high will pull close to 15 amps, headlights 10 amps, power windows on start about 4 to 5 amps. My problem happened all the time: summer, winter ,day, night , dry, wet , foggy ,damp, full moon etc. In the day your blower motor will slow down for an instant.
I've had people flashing their lights at me coming toward me but your experience of the guy in front getting ticked because he thinks your jerking him around. Potential for road rage. My concern was also road safety
Good luck. I have attached a scope inside the vehicle and watched the battery voltage. A normal running regulation is around 13.5 to 14 volts. As your driving or sitting still this will fluctuate, always down, as far as 11.9 to 12 volts. No wonder the injection pump of 5 amps is jerking it around. I will wager that the air pump is a victim and not the cause. The altenator. should be at least 75 amps and should handle 5 for a joke. Can you imagine if all car lights flickered every time your delayed wipers activated(3 to 6 amps), you adjusted your power seat(4 amps), turned your blower up a notch(3amps), turned on your rear defroster(10 amps), signal light (4 amps). Any way I'm sure you get the point. Do not settle for that cop out. Different new alternators work differently, Last time gm made them do a load test and authorized a new new replacement based on that result. I have been driving and working on cars for 25 years and have not had flickering problems like this unless the regulator is shot.
2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech, 2006 Acura TL w/nav