Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.
Nissan Maxima vs. Honda Accord
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
A Maxima GXE is a good value, but I think a Maxima GLE can't compare to a Accord EX-L V6
Also, I had some issues with the Maxima:
- Horrible paint...chips if you look at it funny.
- Ignition coils defective, causing engine knock, hurting mileage. Replaced under warranty, but a hassle
- Radio/CD buttons failed...out of warranty (38K miles, 2 years old), $1500 to replace - unacceptable.
- Replacing in-cabin air filter is very difficult compared to Accord
Anyway, that's my take...you mileage may vary.
Before I got the Maxima, my sister would ask me to drive her Accord (when we were out together) so I have a basis for comparison. Maxima and Accord don't compare. The Maxima is much more sportier and fun looking inside and out. The Maxima's (SE) ride is a little rough due to the larger tires but the tight handling beats the Accord's hands down. Maxima barely leans (almost doesn't) when making turns, now that's sporty! Sloppy...Maxima is NOT (especially on the SE).
I've driven both cars and I feel the difference. The SE handles great and pick up is unbeatable. Maxima out performs the Accord. Hey, don't kill me, this is just my opinion.
Do Accords come standard with Xenon's ?
Interior is much better in the Accord.
Anyone with a doubt can test drive both and see for themselves.
That said, they are both nice cars, and I would choose them over a Camry or Passat anyday.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Not exactly apples to apples!
How do you think the directly comparable '02 Accord would compare with the '02 Maxima? IMO, no comparison, the Maxima wins on every count(except of course the hated rear beam axel)!
Lets get back together and compare the '04 Maxima and the '03 Accord in a few months and see how things look then?
(This board probably will go away then since the cars will be in completely different classes.)
So lets be honest, you cant compare the two cars, especailly considering max owners will be paying a great deal more for their cars.One more point, buy a 2004 maxima for around 33,000 or buy a nicely equipped 328ii for around 35,000, hmm, good luck comparing those two cars.
By the way, I don't think anyone can go wrong with the Max or the Accord, both are really great cars. I prefer the Max.
reincarnation: What do you mean the rear beam on the Maxima is a liablity? I didn't know about that. Please educate me (tell me what you know). Am I looking at future, expensive problems with the rear beam (OOHH NOOOO!!!!)?
"The new Maxima benefits from a generous helping of suspension wizardry. MacPherson struts carry over up front, but the rear struts with parallel links have given way to a new Multi-Link Beam configuration with trailing arms. Lighter, more compact,, more space-efficient, and less expensive to produce, the new system also delivers tangible dynamic improvements over the one it replaces. Nissan will use this patented rear-axle design on many of its upcoming front-drive vehicles, including the new Sentra.
The challenge facing Nissan engineers was to devise rear suspension that would deliver a properly compliant ride while preventing unwanted camber change and suspension jacking under cornering and eliminating scuff change (transverse movement of the body relative to the axle) over uneven road surfaces. Both are common problems in a conventional beam-axle design located by a simple Panhard rod. Nissan's variation on the basic theme involves two key modifications. The first substitutes a special oversize lower bushing in the Panhard rod that's stiff vertically but pliant laterally. The second piece in the puzzle is a control link (formally known as a Scott-Russell link) that connects the Panhard rod with the axle to provide additional stability. This combination ensures that the axle will only move up and down, thereby maintaining proper camber in the rear tires at all times. This unique hardware also maintains a more consistent relationship between the vehicle's roll center and its center of gravity, which contributes to a better cornering feel and less body roll, regardless of loading. Since the springs and shock absorbers no longer have to contend with as much lateral force, they can be made smaller and lighter. The result: Both ride and handling are improve. And, as an extra bonus, fewer suspension mounting points result in less noise being transmitted back into the body structure."
Just curious if above statement is hard data-based or comes from personal observations in a specific locality. Thanks.
Monte4: I'm a female and I only make the medium bucks (as opposed to the big bucks, to me big bucks =$90K+) and I own a Maxima. I did want a sporty car. I didn't cross check the Accord either when making my most recent vehicle purchase. A4 and TL were the runners up. A4 almost made it to my "vehicles I've owned" list but options started to put the vehicle close to $40k. I think Maxima has muscle without looking like it has muscle (if that makes any sense).
Accords are typical here in South Florida. I think its safe to say that 1 out of 5 cars here in South Florida is an Accord.
I don't pretend to understand all of the information either but since I wasn't sure about the level of your "technical knowledge" I thought more information may be better than less.
In summary, most car "fans" seem to think the Maxima's rear beam axel is inferior to a 4 wheel independent suspension (like the Accord has).
However, it's been my experience (>190,000 miles on 95 Maxima GLE and >115,000 miles on 00 Maxima SE) that unless you really intend to push the car hard around corners (like with the tires squealing all the way) you'll never know the difference between the two.
What you will have in the Maxima is an incredible value right now with the ability to easily buy '03 at invoice (+$1,000 rebate)vs MSRP for the Accord, and the overall driving experience and reliability of the well proven Maxima drivetrain.
That said, it is a sportier ride (again IMO)than the Accord but they really are two completely different vehicles.
Drive both back to back and go with your "gut" feeling about which you like better.
If I could afford it I would get an '04 because I trust the quality of the Maxima I have now and I believe the '04 will be no different in this respect. Also I checked out the 3 series horsepower on the BMW site; the '04 has it beat. I know a lot of people didn't care for the 5th gen when it first came out also, so this is just another go around of the same thing.
I love the side profile( it's on my desktop!). the front is what concerns me because, the logo in the grill is so overbearing in the pics, I have to see it in person first. Also how do the fog lights function? Is there any other car with fog lights on the side and not the front?
Over all I do like the styling. To me it fits in with the direction Nissan is taking their vehicles. They look similar, but are distinct in their own way.
And regarding the '04 Max, drak, I have to say my jaw did drop when I saw the first photos, but in a negative way. At this point, I don't like it at all, from any of the angles that I've seen. But I'll reserve final judgement until I see one in the flesh.
Oh yeah. .the new accord doenst exhibit that annoying torque steer that the max does.
I can pick up a completely loaded SE or GLE for less than $26,500 +TTL. That's a sticker of about $30k (without Nav).
I think the torque steer you refer to is probably because the Maxima has pushed to the limit the amount of HP you can run through a FWD sedan. I drive mine like a relativly normal person so I've never (OK maybe once or twice) experienced the infamous torque steer.
What I do have is a very smooth and powerfull sedan that has never left me stranded or failed to go when I wanted, where I wanted to go.
I've been driving two Maxima's (95 GLE and 00 SE) for a combined approx 320,000 miles and I'm seriously thinking about picking up another one just because it's such a great deal and they last so long.
Problem is what do I do with the 95 with 200k on it and still in great condition?
By the way, the 2004 Maxima is still a FWD car so what makes you think the torque steer is gone?
However, when I test drove a 2003 SE the torque steer was much more prominent. I expect the 2004 will be the same.
How 'bout that 350Z Roadster!!! I need to win the lottery.
"So, while we have noted in the past that the Maxima certainly excels in the areas of performance and ride quality, Nissan didn't neglect the details, completing the ride experience with a premium audio system that may even get your teenage kids out of their bedrooms."
"Though we've spoken in the past about the Maxima's comfortable ride, we remain impressed. Nissan has done a standout job providing an excellent balance of sporty performance and fine ride comfort. Coupled with the powerful V6 engine and quick-shifting automatic transmission, the Maxima provides the driver with the responsive handling and rapid acceleration that many so-called sport sedans covet."
So saying that a Maxima is a dated design is a bit short-sighted. Now the Ford Taurus IS a dated design. Both the Maxima and new Accord are very competent, refined vehicles, and the 04 Max should be more so. There are deals on 03 Maximas, so you can get a car with many luxury features for around 24-25K, which is similar to a V6 Accord. Maximas can be catered to the sporty crowd (SE) or the more luxury oriented crowd (GLE); Honda should come out with a sporty version of the Accord.
In comparison, the Accord has had multi-link (front) and twin-arm (front) systems for some time now.
By changing to rear multi-links, it appears that Nissan is also saying that the 04 has an improved version of its outgoing model's suspension.
opportunity to beat on one of these...
2002 Max (top of the line V6) for a month
in Hawaii. Let me tell you...it is fast and
if you do not have full control of the
car at a stop light from nothing to
65 -75 in eight seconds...your a goonnner.
I have seen the front end pop right off
the road and pop left and right...I own
a 2000 accord EX V6 (A/T as well) and
feel the Honda is safer with the
VTEC...smoother. The max itself is a
beautiful car and roomie. I prefer
the accord overall. Honestly, the max
is faster but nothing I would want my
wife to drive around.
Just my 2 cents...gota love when the
rental office runs out of econo-boxes
and haves to give you a max for the
low low price of a 4 banger!
Looked at the 2003 accord today...which
brought me back to the site...beautiful
car but I do like the 2000-2002 body
style...heck, the wife only has
13,700 miles on it and I have had it
for three years now...should I spend the
959.00 on another 36 months warranty?
Kevin