Honda Odyssey vs Dodge/Chrysler minivans

14748505253134

Comments

  • stoopid1stoopid1 Member Posts: 23
    Thanks for not letting me down in the flame department. I so expected this!! However, I'm refusing to engage in debate with either of you. I don't feel I have to justify by displeasure regarding Honda to anyone nor do I feel like I have to provide laundry list of complaints about said vehicle. Nuff' said about Honda. Not worth wasting another moment of my time detailing the my woes connected with that ride. Suffice it to say that I hated it and I'm glad to be rid of it. The new owner is happy since he stole it from me. He got an excellent deal moneywise and since its covered by 100,00 warranty for him he definitely got a deal despite how often it will be in the service bay.

     

    With regard to my purchase, I'm allowed to crow and feel like I did the right thing for me. Its the American way. We all love to feel like we got a deal and I've so earned the right to brag about mine. It was very hard-earned and a long time coming. And really, I find your indignation and outrage about my dumping my vehicle on someone else hysterical since we've all "dumped" a vehicle somewhere that we're disenchanted with; whether it be at a dealer or to another individual. If we hadn't we'd all be driving cars with hundreds of thousands of miles on them and then sending them to the junk yard. In this case, there was no harm done to anyone across the board. We all ended up happy with our respective trades.

     

    Simply put, the topic of this discussion was was Honda or Chrysler -- which do you like? It's not a debate between Accord and T&C and I refuse to make it one, failure to engage!! In my world Chrysler wins; glad to have it! Again, 'nuff said!!

     

    So, get out and drive and enjoy your own rides, whatever they may be. Remember, life's too short for a bad ride!! =)

     

    Peace

    Stoopid(NoMore)!
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Devils Advocate - since you sold an Accord for a TC, why are you posting here? The title is about minivans, not Sedans vs Minivans.
  • stoopid1stoopid1 Member Posts: 23
    Posting here because after driving the Ody I chose Chrysler. Again, the discussion was Honda or Chrysler. I now own a Chrysler mini-van so I feel like I'm in the appropriate forum. And as you can see, I'm strictly sticking to the van discussion by refusing to discuss the sedan I no longer own. Simply put, based on my experience with Honda, in my world the T&C wins in a total smack down over the Ody!! See, right on topic!!

     

    Get out and drive!

    Peace
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    to see if stoopid's happiness continues as time passes.

     

    I hope so.
  • stoopid1stoopid1 Member Posts: 23
    *chuckling*, Ah, isell, I just knew you'd weigh in!! You most assuredly do NOT hope my happiness continues. LMAO!!! You are such a trip. Over these many months I have so marvelled at your steadfast tenacity as the ultimate defender of all things Honda!! *head shaking* Ah, that we should all be so committed to a cause, what a great world it would be. Meanwhile, any day I'm not stuck driving a Honda I just hate IS a happy day so the expectation for continued happiness is great!! Let it rest. There are plenty of happy Honda people to populate your world. Let me be happy in mine "Honda-less" one! Hey, and if years down the road you can sell me a Honda you can then tell me you told me so!! Until then, Happy New Year!!

     

    Peace

    STOOPID1(but not indefinitely so!)
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    In spite of your sarcasm, I truly wish you no harm. I hope your experience with your Chrysler is a good one.

     

    No car is perfect for all people and you, indeed, should drive what you like.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Like Hansienna who now swears by his T & C and plans to buy an Ody in the future, he would soon see the light!

     

    As they say, "if you cannot beat 'em, join 'em".

     

    It will only be a matter of time until the message gets through.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    But the time for change is not as early as had been expected for 2 reasons:

     

         #1. The 2002 T&C LX is exceeding my expectations, has a 7 year 100,000 mile powertrain warranty and 7 year 75,000 mile warranty on virtually everything else. ( Now has 48 months and 72,000 miles remaining on the powertrain and 48 months and 47,000 miles on the other items).

     

         #2. The 2005 Odyssey still has some "bugs" for Honda to resolve. I will feel more comfortable when my nephew tells me his "whistling noise" has been eliminated.
  • tomtomtomtomtomtom Member Posts: 491
    I don't think anyone would just stick with one car/brand/model without looking for another options. I like my 2001 T&C Ltd and have no need for the Stow 'n go so I don't even consider that but who knows when I decide to get another minivan I am going to check all the brands and models. In fact, back in 2001 I was interested in the Ody before I bought the T&C but none of the dealers have one that I can test drive. I didn't feel like putting down a deposit and pay over MSRP for a car that I don't even get to test drive and yes I didn't like salesperson's attitude either.
  • crusadercrusader Member Posts: 4
    I use to own a 98 t&c. Loved it. When I needed to purchase a new van I wanted the T&C again. We were shocked. The 05 was horrible. The fold and go seats are a waste. They are so small my 15 year old could not sit in them. The van also was not made nearly as well as my 98. The ride wasn't even close. I did end up with the Honda. The 05 Honda is a better van. Just one persons opinion.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    You have seen the light!

     

    Isellhondas: When are you going to pay commissions to me? LOL
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    Check the link for yourself. Macakava has apparently not been very convincing with reasons to buy the Odyssey.

     

        December 2004 Sales Numbers:

     

    Caravan/Grand Caravan - 24,944

    Chrysler T&C - 16,377

    Honda Odyssey - 15,687

    Toyota Sienna - 12,423

     

         Interestingly, Dodge, Chrysler, and Honda sales were up for December over November while most other minivan sales were down.

         The Mazda MPV was DOWN significantly from a low 2336 in November to a dismal 1671 in December.

     

         Why have Toyota Sienna sales dropped in December from November?

    http://www.autosite.com/editoria/asmr/svvan.asp
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    The DGC and T & CD are peddled very cheaply, relative to Ody and Sienna, to the car rentals like Thrifty, Dollar, etc. So it is a no-brainer. That and the low prices ($16K for a DGC and under $20K for a T & C to the general public) make it very attractive to the car rentals. Volume purchase prices would even lower!

     

    Same scenario when Ford claims to have the largest volume sales for the Taurus over the Camry and Accord. It is common knowledge that the Camry and Accord are superior to the Taurus and they have now both overtaken Taurus in sales in the past 2 yrs.

     

    Ford is now focussing the Taurus for the car rentals where it belongs.
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    We all know about the rentals. It's part of their sales. We get it.

     

    The question WAS:

     

    Why did T&C surpass the Sienna & Ody in Dec, which had been beating it in sales all year? Particularly the Sienna, which it sold 30% nmore than last month??
  • badgerfanbadgerfan Member Posts: 1,565
    As far as I am concerned since the Dodge and Town and Country vans are identical under the skin, we should just look at Dodge+Chrysler brands lumped together. In any case, the main reasons they outsell the others:

     

    Stow and Go Seating-a big selling point favoring DaimlerChrysler over the competition.

     

    Both long and short wheel base versions available and models ranging from an inexpensive basic Caravan to an all the bells and whistles in a top of the line T&C

     

    Wide availability on the dealer's lots

     

    Better mix of available option choices without paying top dollar (you can get Stow and Go on fairly basic models, as well as power doors and rear gate without stepping up to top of the line models).

     

    Excellent incentives, discounts and rebates.

     

    Standard extended power train warranties.

     

    Improving quality to the point where quality and reliability issues are becoming nonissues.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    It is called year-end rebates/incentives to pad up the 2004 year sale numbers. That was when I noticed DGC at about $16K and T & C for under $20K.

     

    Sienna and Ody do not wish to play that game to that extent because they know that they can command better prices for their superior products.
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    Sienna and Ody do not wish to play that game to that extent because they know that they can command better prices for their superior products. << Just a different strategy. Double the sales at half the per van profit is the same thing. The Japenese vans are most likely superior. But many people don't think the small difference is worth the big time premium you have to spend, when the DC incentives are factored in. As evidenced by the sales figures
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    Actually, no. I have never "dumped" a car off on anyone. I have made fair deals where I felt both buyer and seller benefited. Sure, I bargain, but no one has to accept what I offer and if they do, I assume they think it is fair as well. Your prior post seemed to indicate there were problems with the car you sold that may not have been clear to the buyer. And if you think the buyer of your car now "received an excellent deal" while in your prior post you were so happy you "dumped" the car on the buyer, then I guess you had a change of heart.

     

    I don't think you answered my question about how you factor in the difference in gas cost alone driving a T&C vs. an Accord, which would be a pretty penny over ayear, I imagine.

     

    No one flamed you. I just asked for clarification and questioned the "dumping" and crowing.
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    That question is actually an easy one ... "Re: Why did Chrysler T&C outsell every brand but Dodge Caravan/Grand Caravan? [macakava]."

     

    First, T&Cs are cheaper. I negotiated a price for a 2005 T&C Limited that was $1400 LESS than the best I could get for a Honda Ody EX-L one step down in models ($1K over invoice, still a very good deal). If more people can afford it, more people will buy it. Second, they make more to feed the lease and fleet vehicle need. Finally, many people in the US "buy American" just because it is American. If you live in a coastal city you might doubt this, but it is true. I lived in D.C, San Fran., Indiana and Colorado. In Indiana there were so many American cars on the road compared to imports that everyone looked like an unmarked state cop! I was astounded at how many people "bought GM" or "bought Ford" because, well, they always did and were Americans. On the coasts there were far more imports and far more concern over quality and long-term ownership.
  • badgerfanbadgerfan Member Posts: 1,565
    Macakava, that is too simple.

     

    DaimlerChrysler has two plants dedicated exclusively to minivan production and can simply build more than twice as many as either Toyota or Honda.

     

    Sure DC would like to sell them all at MSRP, however to keep the factories humming requires incentives. So what? That is good for the consumer, even those consumers who buy Siennas and Odysseys, as this creates pricing pressure upon them as well, with everyone fighting for market share.

     

    Dedicate two each of Honda or Toyota plants to flat out production of minivans only and you would see them with incentives out the wazoo as well, "superior" product or not.

     

    Honda and Toyota do not "play that game" only because they have been production capacity limited on minivans.

     

    Note, I understand that in Calendar year 2004 Honda was discounting their 2004 models pretty heavily as the 2005 model year came into stock as well. Maybe not with factory to customer rebates but with dealer incentives, which are less easily sniffed out by the customer, but are a form of rebate nonetheless as long as the dealer is willing to pass his savings on to the customer.

    That kind of "game" on Honda's part is the same, only sneakier, as the rebate goes only to the dealer who can elect to keep it as profit or discount the vehicle, whichever suits him best.
  • badgerfanbadgerfan Member Posts: 1,565
    Yes the coasts buy imports more, but I would bet the heartland in general buys more on value, and quite the opposite from your statement, actually keep their vehicles longer as well, not having to feel they are "unsuccessful" if they drive a five or ten year old car.

     

    There is a lot less emphasis on having a "status" car as well, so you will see a lot less Beemers, Mercedes, Lexi, etc. away from the coasts.
  • ypresiaypresia Member Posts: 27
    Whether you want to say it's because Honda isn't try to go for large sales like Chrysler, or can't, either explanation works out to be about the same.

     

    Honda does run nearly 2 1/2 times the profit margin as DaimlerChrysler.
  • badgerfanbadgerfan Member Posts: 1,565
    Well if they can continue with those profit margins more power to them, but I am not going to subsidize overpriced merchandise just to have a Honda "H" on my minibox. Based on sales volumes, a huge majority of other customers are very happy to do the same.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    I think the question may have been answered.

     

    Rental car companies buy Chrysler minivans en masse. It's possible some huge year end orders were placed?
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    Honda COULD have sold MANY more Odysseys if they only had them to sell! The lots were clogged with chryslers and they were readilly available at fire sale prices.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Your right!

     

    When you have overcapacity and excess inventory of products that afe of less demand, you have to sell at a lower margin or loss to reduce the inventory. The other option is to incur interest cost to carry inventory which ages and becomes less valuable. The better choice of huge discounts to reduce inventory is obvious!

     

    Just.... Business 101
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    For many folks like me, we are prepared to pay more for a product that has superior performance and is more trouble-free relative to the competition. The aggravation and wasted time of frequent visits to the dealer for many warranty work repairs with a less reliable vehicle, and the higher residual value of the more reliable vehicle exceeds the initial extra cost.

     

    When I bought my Ody, there were Windstars with $10K rebates and Chryslers with a bit smaller rebates. I am very glad that I got my Ody Ex at Invoice which cost more than the competition. I have not experienced any warranty problems and its "sporty handling" performance has been a pure driving enjoyment. I have driven 30+ minivan rentals (some T & C, most DGC) on business trips in the past 18 months - their driving/handling performance are not "sporty" to make driving enjoyable. I was always happy to get back to my Ody.

     

    As far as being patriotic American is concerned, that is no longer an issue as the Ody and others(Sienna, Quest) are made right here in good ole USA with American labor and 75+% sourced american made parts.
  • isellhondasisellhondas Member Posts: 20,342
    That is a MAJOR issue for a lot of people in certain parts of this country!
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    This is my first mini van. I drove my brother's DC a couple of years ago and loved the car like handling and quiet interior. Hated taking out the rear and middle seats though, as they were so heavy. When Dodge came out with stow and go seats this year, I jumped on buying it. It is even quieter than my brothers and the room you have to store things in the stow binds is just great. No cluttering up the seats or floor with things like tools, battery cables,umbrellas, blanket, deflated air bed,etc. With the seats up, everything can be neatly put out of sight.

     

    I also find by stowing one of the middle seats when not needed, it is so fast to get the grand kids in and out of the van and seated. Especially helpful when it is raining.

     

    I have read a few messages that said they didn't like the stow and go seats. That's the main reason I bought my mini van. I love the idea of folding them flat into the floor when I need to carry stuff and not taking them out. I love the storage space it gives you when seats are in place. I hate having things setting in the floor or seats. It just keeps the van so neat. I even bought a little three way power B/W/ television, I think will fit in the storage bins. For a little entertainment on some long trips I'm going to take this year. Love this van.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    It is a well-known fact that certain vehicles with their handling/ride characteristics appeal to different age groups. That said, many baby boomers may prefer a boaty/floaty ride with a not-engaging driving experience that have been typical of domestic brands from since their younger days. Nothing is wrong with this - it is just a general preference for that generation.

     

    A great example is the Crown Vic and/or Grand Marquis and Buick(?) where the average buyer age is 60+.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I'm 52 and I'm not shopping floaty rides. I think the generalizations are pretty hard to pin down - look at all the boomer sales of the Scions and Element that were intended to go to the Echos (the generation, not the Toyota).

     

    Steve, Host
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    You and I are in the same boat regarding age and ride types. And can be considered part of the exception/minority(?).
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    I'm not sure just because of my age you can say I might appeal to the boaty/floaty ride. Our second car is a 2004 Honda Civic and I wouldn't call that a boaty/floaty ride car. Don't really consider the DGC that way either, although it does ride smoother and the 8 way power bucket seats and arm rests fit like a glove compared to the Civic. But it is a van that you can drive for quite a while and stay comfortable in.

     

    But your right, before we got the Honda Civic, we had a Ford LTD and that was quite a nice boaty ride.

     

    I am sort of disapointed in some of the stuff I heard was on earlier Dodge vans that Chrysler took off the new ones. Also disapointed Honda didn't put an automatic trunk release on their cars with remote entry, or a cup holder for the back seat riders.
  • 1997montez341997montez34 Member Posts: 202
    I am 30. My other car is a 2003 Accord, which has a firm ride. But when shopping for a van for my family I wanted a smooth, silky ride. I am not autocrossing in a minivan. The Odyssey rode like my Accord. Fine for me but IMHO not good for a baby in a carseat. The Sienna and the Grand Caravan both rode very smooth over bumps and handle perfectly well in normal driving.

     

    We ended up with a lease on the Grand Caravan SXT and couldn't be happier. It came down to option availability and cost.
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    badgerfan, we agree on the "value" point. Chryslers cost less and therefore are viewed as a better value by those who are not especially concerned with keeping it 7+ years or who are used to American cars needed repairs and just chalk it up as part of the experience. As for keeping cars longer in the Midwest, I don't know. I have relatives and friends back in Indiana and all of them have traded in cars roughly every 3-4 years. Some even BUY the cars (including the T&C ... one relative of mine has had 3 T&Cs and one Pacifica in 12 years) and then trade them, saying that Chrysler gives them a high resale value. I guess. The irony is the folks I know love their T&Cs and say they never had any problems, but since they don't keep them for more than 4 years, they shouldn't.

     

    As for status, a Honda and Tpyota don't qualify for status. Lexus, yes, BMW, yes, etc. The coasters buy more imports (especially Japanese cars), and I don't know exactly why other than they tend to be more open minded than the "Buy American" Midwest. But there is little prestige applied to a regular old Honda or Toyota.
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    macakava, I think we agree on all but the last point. I know from the folks I still know (and am related to) in the Midwest that all but the most aware and open-minded don't care whether a Honda or Toyota was assembled in the US. To them, they are not American cars. Period. I have heard it often enough, and still do.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Midwest and "American" cars has to do more with the fact that the midwest has traditionally been the base of the "American" auto manufacturers. Further it is a more unionized area than the coasts, hence the feeling of needing to preserve "jobs".
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Denver5357 & Robr2,

     

    I agree and understand both of you.

     

    However there are some folks who tend to be narrow-focussed and do not see the big picture in the evolution. Where the foreign manufacturers have moved their production stateside and provided employment for USA residents.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Hey even here in liberal MA, some people are pretty narrow minded. My father-in-law, while driving Canadian made Ford Crown Vic's for years, scoffed at my foreign Ohio built Hondas.

     

    He still won't look at anything but Ford either. He's not too enthused with the idea of my buying a Volvo - even though it's owned by Ford.
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    My grandfather-in-law retired from GM and while he has never given me a hard time about my Toyota, he has pointedly ignored it. Until one day in a restaurant parking lot when he was talking to my wife as we were getting ready to pull away, and he said he couldn't even tell the Toyota's engine was on because it was so quiet. That was funny.
  • macakavamacakava Member Posts: 775
    Was he wearing his hearing aid that day? LOL
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I test drove a bunch of vans in late '98 while shopping. I cranked the Sienna I demo'd.

     

    It was already running....

     

    Steve, Host
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    is that the owners are not likely to always go back to the dealer for service as are many foreign owners.

     

    I'm an example of that. I have a 2004 Honda Civic that I take back to the Honda dealer to even get oil changes. My other American vehicles I have had, such as my 1993 Eagle Vision and 2001 Dodge Dakota P/U, I would take to the nearest and cheapest lube or corner mechanic to have work done on them. I figure they know all about American cars and trucks.

     

    That has come home to bit me twice. Years ago, I took my Eagle Vision into a mostly tire store, that also did light mantainence, to have the transmission fluid changed. Well, I find out they used the wrong type of fluid in my transmission. It started shifting differently and I thought it was going out. I had it checked by a tranny shop and they could see nothing wrong with it. They asked what kind of fluid I had in it, as they could see it was very clean. I had them check with the tire store and found out it was the wrong type. I it filled with the right fluid and had them pay the tranny place for the new fluid and inspection. The tranny ran great after that.

     

    I also made a mistake of having the fluid for rear end of my Dodge Dakota changed at a oil change place. They didn't have the proper tools to do it and it wound up leaking after they did it.

     

    Now I am pretty fussy where I get my service done. I still do not always go to the dealer, but I have someone I can trust do the minor stuff. The Honda, will go back to the dealers for all service.

     

    Now I have a 2005 Dodge mini van. I will trust them to change the tranny fluid and any major things. Oil changes? I still don't think so.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    According to my 2002 T&C owner's manual, the transmission fluid needs to be changed ONLY if the vehicle is driven at high speeds over 50 % of the time when outside temperature is 90 F or higher. If that severe driving situation exists, the transmission fluid should be changed at 48,000 miles.

         Otherwise, there is NO recommended change of transmission fluid (and my T&C has the DaimlerChrysler 7 year 100,000 powertrain warranty). DC must be quite confident in the long life of the DC minivan transmissions.

         The oil change recommended is at 7,500 miles or 6 months under normal usage and 3,000 miles for severe service. The previous owner had oil and filter changed at 3,000 miles at the Chrysler dealer and I will do the same. I would do the same with a Honda Odyssey.

         Brake pads checked at 22,500 miles normal service, or 9,000 if mostly stop and go driving. (Son's 99 GC SE had no brake pad replacement until 73,000 miles).

         Air cleaner filter replaced at 30,000 mile normal service or 15,000 miles if driven when there is a lot of dust in the air.

         Serpentine belt to be inspected and replaced if necessary at 60,000 miles.

         Engine coolant and spark plugs are to be changed at 100,000 miles or 60 months.
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    "According to my 2002 T&C owner's manual, the transmission fluid needs to be changed ONLY if the vehicle is driven at high speeds over 50 % of the time when outside temperature is 90 F or higher."

     

    I live in Arizona and 90 F would be a cool day here in the summer.

     

    One reason for that 7/100,000 powertrain warranty is because of lots of trouble with their transmissions. I change it every 30,000 miles. Heat has always been a killer to transmissions.
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    Agree that 90 F is a cool day in Arizona in the summer. I would follow your maintenance schedule if I lived in Arizona. (Please send some warm Arizona air up to Colorado and Wyoming.)
  • marine2marine2 Member Posts: 1,155
    I follow schedule B in the owner's manual. On our Honda, schedule B means I only have to change the oil every 5,000 miles. It's 10,000 on schedule A. Change antifreeze after 100,000 miles.

     

    I'll wait till this summer to send that warm air if that's all right. Right now it's cold, 67 degrees out.
  • stoopid1stoopid1 Member Posts: 23
    unwillingness to engage in a debate. I'll keep my answer to you brief and "undebatable". Again I clarify that all parties concerned in my trade are satisfied of a good deal and are happy with their bargaining. The purchaser of my car was privy to all service records, the VIN number and the telephone number of the dealership used to deal with issues regarding the vehicle. Therefore, I'm assuming armed with that information along with being a meticulous shopper he was willing to accept the Honda I was selling, at the price which I was asking, feeling confident that he could accept the vehicle as is. He had all the information he needed to make his choice and still chose to purchase the car.

     

    I, personally, am intolerant of a vehicle with a recalled transmission that is subseuqently "updated" which still does not perform to my standards (i.e, erratically at best); of a vehicle that chews through two sets of brakes and turned rotors in 16,000 miles; and whose CD/radio unit blows out and must be replaced. I don't in any way feel this was a "superior" Honda product and was unwilling to continue to pay for, depend upon and drive the vehicle, despite its 100,000 powertrain warranty. I no longer wanted to own the vehicle.

     

    The purchaser of said vehicle obviously didn't have a problem with any of these issues or complaints otherwise he wouldn't have bought and paid for it.

     

    Choice of words - from my perspective I dumped a vehicle I hated. From his perspective he received an excellent deal and made an informed and educated purchase. So - fair deal. No change of heart from me - to me I STILL dumped it.

     

    Again, this is not a sedan v. van discussion so I won't justify to you the gas mileage issue as apparently to me its not one since I've chosen the van. Repeating, this is a van discussion.

     

    Perhaps you should get the facts before flaming (translated: coming across self-righteously indignant regarding a trade that had nothing to do with you to me is flaming); could save you some time and embarrassment or not.

     

    Move on and get out and drive!

    Peace

    Stoopid(like you really believe that!)
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Member Posts: 626
    That has come home to bit me twice. Years ago, I took my Eagle Vision into a mostly tire store, that also did light mantainence, to have the transmission fluid changed. Well, I find out they used the wrong type of fluid in my transmission. It started shifting differently and I thought it was going out. I had it checked by a tranny shop and they could see nothing wrong with it. They asked what kind of fluid I had in it, as they could see it was very clean. I had them check with the tire store and found out it was the wrong type. I it filled with the right fluid and had them pay the tranny place for the new fluid and inspection. The tranny ran great after that.

      

    I also made a mistake of having the fluid for rear end of my Dodge Dakota changed at a oil change place. They didn't have the proper tools to do it and it wound up leaking after they did it.

      

    Now I am pretty fussy where I get my service done. I still do not always go to the dealer, but I have someone I can trust do the minor stuff. The Honda, will go back to the dealers for all service.

      

    Now I have a 2005 Dodge mini van. I will trust them to change the tranny fluid and any major things. Oil changes? I still don't think so. <<

    I used to get my oil changed at the big national chains. Then I heard of all the horror stories of untightened filters, or drain plugs, or wrong oil used, etc. For the most part, he people that work there are only trained to work there. Not certified mechanics. I now get my oil changed at the dealership (I have a T&C). At my Chrysler dealer, they know intimately the cars they are working with, and are fully certified to work with them - and it costs the same or less than the national chains! It also eliminates any maintenance questions if you have a subsequent warranty issue with your car. I paid $23 each the 2 times I have had to get it changed. The only possible negative is that you can't just show up and get an oil change, but I just need to call a few days ahead of time, so that's not an issue to me. Just wanted to add my .02.
  • denver5357denver5357 Member Posts: 319
    I assume that was directed at me.

     

    Ok, whatever makes you happy. I can see your earlier post and you seem to have gone from one extreme to another, but maybe you had a bad day.

     

    The gas price question was relevant, because you bragged about how much money you made off the sale of your Accord and the low price you paid for the T&C, and I asked basically how much more the T&C would cost you per year in gas, since the mileage is worse. That would be a factor in your financial gain. But you don't think so, so enjoy and be happy in your world.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.