Did you recently rush to buy a new vehicle before tariff-related price hikes? A reporter is looking to speak with shoppers who felt pressure to act quickly due to expected cost increases; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com for more details by 4/24.
Nissan Murano 2005 and earlier
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
A lot of people will disagree with that statement.
I just love laughing at them as I blow past them in their over-priced Suburban street wagon.
Ppower
That averages out to a 4.7% grade.
tidester, host
tidester, host
Ppower
I love the murano. I want one. But I can't see paying MORE for a Nissan than for a Lexus. It just seems wrong.
Of course, with time, I believe Murano prices will come down. The dealer closest to me had 4 Muranos on the lot for about three weeks. two sold, two remain.
We'll see what happens with the next shipment.
Besides from my point of view I can get a Murano at $200 over invoice, so it is still the cheaper choice for me. If the 4runner would come down to around invoice price I would seriously consider it too. The only problem with me and getting a 4WD 4runner is I know I will take it out and beat it up off-roading. LOL.
Ppower
Ppower
One would think the FWD version would be noticeably quicker and VDC/TCS should take care of poor road conditions.
Wife is in love with the Murano, but I am not yet sure about the long term durability of the CVT in a vehicle with this much torque.
http://www.apexjapan.com/photonews/tas_nissan.html
I think the version used in the murano is more like the Audi version though and it uses a steel chain.
http://autozine.kyul.net/technical_school/gearbox/tech_gear.htm#CVT
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/2003vehicles/murano/cvt.shtml
One more article.
http://www.edmunds.com/news/innovations/articles/43036/article.html
Ppower
Thanks for the info. I had read two of those articles previously, and they were the ones that mentioned that nobody has put a CVT in an engine much above 2.0 liters. Great to know Nissan has CVTs in the Skyline and Cedric/Gloria.
Based on my experience with Infiniti's(2 I-30's without any unscheduled maintenance), I am confident Nissan has done its homework. Just re-living my past experience with other makes that did not deliver on the promises (e.g, turbos in the '70's).
Cheers.
I own a '01 Acura CL [no side molding] after 2.5 years [knock on wood] no dings. Over my years of car ownership I've learned, and I would just as soon walk a few more yards [100's if need be] than have to look-at or fix door dings on any of my cars.
For my next car I've been waiting for that all-purpose vehicle; four doors, AWD, sporty, some cargo space when picking up a few items from the hardware store, not too SUV'ish, NO luxury price-tag, & NO soccer mom looks.
~~~ Am I in the right place ???
Would you say that "soccer mom looks" applies to the Murano? The sloping nose and long dash suggest minivan somewhat to me.
Thanks.
My opinion is this: it goes so fast and handles so well that it's a performance sportswagon. If you choose a guy's color combination, no one will mistake your wheels for those of a soccer matron...
Our TMV is the same as MSRP but that number is a projection since significant real sales figures haven't rolled in to be able to adjust it. Judging by messages in here, some dealers are discounting some models already, so there's a good chance you can beat the MSRP/TMV pricing. The car sales slump should help depress prices too.
Steve, Host
As, for side moldings they are not going to save you from door dings you get in the wheel well lip area. The best way to avoid door dings is be observant in your parking. Don't park next to POSs and cars that are obviously owned by people who don't care or don't know now how to park. If, they can't park their car right, they sure are not going to bother not trying to hit your's with their door. And lastly when possible park next to a concrete curb that juts out. You then have a 50% less chance of getting a door ding, since someone can only park on your one side. Just don't do it if one of the above stated people is parked in the spot next to it.
I personally would never by a Mitsubishi car again. Had an eclipse and it was junk. Thin sheet metal too. They make great electronics (the monitor I am using right now is a Mitsubishi 2020u 22"), but I don't care for their cars.
Ppower
AWD adds $1400 to the invoice price. I live in the Northeast (about 60 miles NW of NYC) and have gotten through many a winter without AWD in small cars. Is it worth it for the Murano (handling, resale), or is FWD w/traction control sufficient, as it saves $ and gas? This was probably already discussed, but thanks.
Regarding side molding, I added aftermarket molding myself to my current car and was pleased with it.
Linzybel, for styling, I wonder if the Front Bumper Tube Bar ($199) would push it a bit more to SUV than van in the front.
I'm hoping a Front Strut Tie Bar (FSTB) will be made available for the Murano. I put one on each of my Maxima's and it significantly flattens the cornering. (They were less than $100 each and take all of 10 minutes to install.)
However, the CVT setup may force me to wait 1-2 years just to make certain there are NO glitches, plus allowing Nissan to work out any others.
When the MDX first came out I really thought it would be my next all purpose vehicle, except the waiting list is still tends to be long. And the prices have simply gone way over board, the base started out at 34k is now 38k, the Tour is was 38k is now 43-45. That's 4-7 G's more than when it first came out, way too rich for my blood, at least today it is.
Heck all cars are getting pricey, hopefully Nissan, Mazda, Honda will try & keep things reasonable. Who knows for sure.
What went bad:
computer
2 rad fans
Mass air meter ($350 for a stupid plastic part!)
water pump-caused head to warp
brake caliber
vacuum lines rotted out
paint wore off roof and rear fender topsides
As, for the price on the Murano don't pay MSRP or even close to it. If they are not willing to deal at invoice or close to it just wait in a couple months they will.
Ppower
Jack
My first reaction: "Wow! What *IS* that?!?" It is really striking.
But my immediate second reaction as I looked at it in my rear view: it looks like a modern version of the AMC PAcer. Very wide for it's overall size.
I actually liked the Pacer when it first came out, and I like the Murano too. Not sure how well that styling will hold up though. Interestingly, I recall being at an AMC dealer back in '75 and they were asking full invoice for the first few Pacers. As it is, the Murano is just not priced competitively enough for consideration by me. Too bad.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
If I'm not mistaken Saturn is offering 1,000 or 2,500 cashback towards the down payment. Other than that I don't think they bargain from MSRP.
In regards to premium fuel for the Murano, there are discussions about that in the Pathfinder forum every so often and the general consensus is stick with premium.
I also agree that the Murano with no movement from MSRP makes the RX300 a better choice. In So. Ca. nobody has been budging from sticker.The only way that they might sway my opinion is if they give me a great deal on my 02 PF.Or I might just wait a year to buy a Murano.
Also where's the advertising for the Murano? Watching football and seen a couple of good commercial for the Beetle Conv.
Steve
Most cars that want premium fuel are high compression engines or engines that run fored induction. Sure you can run a lower grade fuel, but don't exect as good of performance. The knock-sensor will detect it and retard the engine timing. Down the road (so to speak) using cheap fuel in the above listed engines can cause some problems.
Ppower
I am 6'4" and about 250lbs. Big guy. I dont fit in most cars or even most suvs. I try lots of vehicles to see if I can get comfortable. Highlander/Lexus - no, Mercedes ML - not bad but headliner is an inch from your head and steering wheel hit my leg. Acura - Needs telescoping wheel - it hit my legs. Murano...Even with the sunroof, I am fitting really nice in the Murano. Lots of legroom. Cabin feels spacious. I like the larger dashboard as it makes the cabin feel bigger. Doesnt look like a minivan as some have said. The whole care us unique and a head turner. It only looks like what you want to make it... Psyc 101. Seats are very comfortable for me. Fit and finish on the car is very tight. Japaneese build quality at it's best. Sure, some of the dash knobs are a bit cheap looking, but they are solid. All control functions are very solid. No squeaks or rattles. Drives real nice. A bit jiggly on broken/bumpy streets. Very quiet at 70mph on the freeway. Tranny seems to make a low growl at low speed aceleration but is very smooth. I noticed this on the one I test drove too, so it must be the design. I dont think it is the engine. It idles so quiet and smooth you dont even know its on. Power for acceleration is great and smooth. Does this sound like an ad... It's not and I have never owned a Nissan. I was in a Volvo S80T6 (which also had great room and comfort) - but wanted something higher ( easier to get in/out of) and different. The new Volvo SUV drives nice and has lots of room in the front seats, but the second row has NO room at all and the second row seats do NOT recline and are at a very straight angle. Even my kids thought they were uncomfortable. The Murano second row does recline and it has loads more legroom. Volvo mistakenly shoved the second row up to make room for a third row that virtually no one will use.
As you can tell , so far ( 3 days ) I am very happy with the car. Price seems a bit high but it will come down, and if you compare the details in all areas, I think Nissan has a winner. The Infiniti FX looks like the exact same platform with very similar interior controls (but with normal tranny) with a bit different styling. Of course the Infiniti will look much more slick and high end on the inside (which will make a difference for some) but with the same V6 engine I hear it will be about 5k more than the loaded one I got.
Only potential drag is...Right now I am only gettting 15mpg combined city and highway which is a lot lower than the 20/25 epa estimate. (Although I only have 60 miles on the car)... So, I 'll go a bit longer to see if it increases as the engine breaks in and the computer figures things out.
Anyway... enough gabbing. Just thought I'd give you all my take. If you are looking , look at this one real close in all areas.
Happy motoring.
Thanks for info.
Ppower