By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I own a Toyota. I would be horribly disappointed if i bought a GM truck that was a piece of junk. The Chev pack keeps posting that if you buy enough GM trucks, you MIGHT get a good one.
I did not want to play LOTTO with my $30K. I bought a Tundra.
Furthermore, I am totally shocked that any Rado/Sierra owner would even DARE come in a Toy thread and babble on about the Tundra's problems lol. I'll take the rotors/cold knock etc anyday over the Rado's probs. . Too bad cause I've always liked the design of Rado.
99-00 Rado Consumer Complaints
* WHILE DRIVING THE STEERING WHEEL COLLAPSED.DEALER WAS CONTACTED AND THE PROBLEM HAS BEEN FIXED.
* FRONT END WHEELS WOBBLE TERRIBLY AND FEEL LIKE THEY WILL FALL OFF.
* WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH THE DRIVER'S SEAT COLLAPSED AND THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SEAT DROPPED DOWN WITH A STARTLING UNEXPECTED SHOCK CAUSING THE DRIVER TO SWERVE
* THE 1999 CHEV. SILVERADO WITH RACK AND PINION HAS MANY PROBLEMS AND G-M IS TRYING TO SWEEP IT UNDER THE RUG
* THE LEFT REAR WING GLASS/EXTENDED CAB BLEW OUT -WINDOW WAS CLOSED /DID NOT STRIKE ANYTHING, BUT WENT ACROSS THE OPPOSITE LANE OF TRAFFIC AND LANDED ON THE SIDE OF THE ROAD.
* TRUCK LESS THAN A MONTH OLD, BEEN IN SHOP OVER 9 DAYS. DEALERSHIP STILL DOES NOT NO HOW TO FIX PROBLEM
* DRIVER LUMBAR SUPPORT INFLATES BY ITSELF,
* DRIVING ON HIGHWAY AND DRIVE SHAFT FELL OFF. NO WARNING OF PROBLEM. BOLTS REMAINED IN AND THE SHAFT JUST FELL OUT. TOW TRUCK DRIVER SAID NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THIS
* CONSUMER HAS TO GO UNDER VEHICLE TO DISENGAGE ENGINE FROM RUNNING UPON TURNING VEHICLE OFF
* THE MANUFACTURER OF THE VEHICLE DID NOT INSTALL FRONT SHOCK ABSORBERS
* I WENT TO EXIT MY VEHICLE, IN PARK, WHEN I BUMPED THE #2 MEMORY SEAT SETTING ON DOOR. THE SEAT WENT ALL THE WAY FORWARD. I WAS UNSUCCESSFUL AT GETTING IT TO STOP OR GO IN REVERSE WHILE IT WAS MOVING FORWARD. IT WAS HARD TO GET OUT OF THE SEAT. MY RIBS WERE SORE FOR 1 DAY
Who knows
I heard of some problems when people were over tightening the plastic screws on them.
It didnt fall apart i must have a good one eh?
I paid after taxes $29691
Plus all the accessories probably at least $34K+
All well worth it
obyone, do you need a hug? Does your Lemonado got you down?
All trucks have pros and cons. A con for my truck is the low side impact rating, yet OVERALL my Tacoma fares better than the S-10 (which you conveniently never mention!).
BUT ALAS, being a certified lemon isn't one of my truck's cons!!!
You really need to get over this side impact rating thing you're so hung up on. You sound like a broken record, and it's about as annoying as those whining Chevy transmissions...
I'm sensing a patina of anger and resentment surrounding a certain Ford owner's last post. The last Ford owner seems level headed, but confused. And there is a corona of inadequacy. I think there are some sun spots and aurora borealis that say he/she needs a hug.
LMFAO!
Oh!, he/she is supposedly a newbie. He/she is going to have to look it up!
Uh, Oh! Here comes another post from the sensitive one about anger! Geez - I shore didn't want to hurt his/her delicate feelings! Now I am going to get another lecture from him/her! Maybe if I apologize to him/her? NAAAAAHHHH!
I think that there is a certain cowardice about talking about another person in the third tense. (I am not talking about any particular person, of course).
URfeelingWEE - Welcome!
So let's stick to the trucks please
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
SOUNDS LIKE AN ENDORSEMENT TO ME!!!!
Hey if we could just pick Bama up, maybe the 3 of us can take Quad over to John Elway Toyota and get the big guy all set up lol. Who knows though, if the 3 of us end up in Co., we might just find ourselves all converted to Chevs somehow. = )
Hey, maybe Home Depot has rebars on sale this week. I'll help ya weld them onto your doors.
I've heard talk of a 5.4 and Ford sells lots of F250's with thier SOHC 5.4 but that's the SMALLEST engine available.Toyota's DOHC should have an advantage over Ford's smallest offering but it's still not a B.B.
Don't get me wrong,people will certianly buy them,but not those of us that want 450+ pounds of torque.
So far this topic is just fantasy but when Toy DOES bring a 3/4 ton to the table it seems likely it'll be in the same fashion as the Tundra,UNDERSIZED and UNDERPOWERED for a majority of those in the market.
It should make a GREAT 1/2 ton though.
kip
KG - Most certainly I agree with you. The 4.7 is on the lighter side of the 1/2 tons, and theres definitely reason to think that any future 5.4 would be on small side of 3/4 ton. If anything, I'm sure the 5.4 would be a very strong, solid 1/2 ton for Toyota if nothing else. Even if they up the engine size, I still think theres issues about just how structurally able the truck is/will be.
I somehow get the impression sometimes that the suspension and other related components of Tundra, aren't as rigid or strong as they need to be. I did see a guy the other day though at a construction site, with his Tundra loaded to brim and then some with concrete, ladders, heavy machinery, and the suspension on truck looked quite steady still.
3/4 ton = 1500#
Toyota is famous for designing their own definition and specs. A good example is their posted ground clearance for the Tundra....
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/Info.html
and here's the one star link:
http://www.nhtsa.com/NCAP/Cars/1997Pkup.html
Please note on the links that it IS from the NHTSA site. BTW, was it you that had or is having the problem with only having one tow hook?
And since I have your attention, what would you do if your current truck had a one star side impact rating? Would you still be driving it or trade it or seek some resolution from Toyota like the sludged owners are? I'm just curious cause I know for myself, I'd be on the phone to Toyota as soon as I had seen the results and if I wasn't satisfied with their answer the truck would've been gone in a flash with me buying exactly "0" Toyota products forever. I had noticed some of those sludged Toyota owners felt the same.
While you might take yourself that seriously, the rest of us think you're a joke. With all due respect, you have illusions of grandeur!
http://www.nhtsa.com/NCAP/Cars/1997Pkup.html
http://www.nhtsa.com/NCAP/Cars/1999Pkup.html
As for the tow hook: I don't have a problem. It's just that everyone thinks that "Oh, he almost rolled over because he didn't have 2 real towhooks that stick out from under the bumper". I could have used 2, but got out just the same with 1 (2 winches on 1 tow hook...if thats weak, I'm Queen Elizabeth).
If I found out: I'd keep looking. Because I don't trust NHTSA results too much and think IIHS results are more realistic, and because NHTSA keeps changing the results from year to year even though no structural changes were made.
And you can flush your links on 1997 and 1999 trucks. Mine's a 1998. Good try, though. Really!
http://www.highwaysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/summary_lgpickup.htm
Just look at those pictures of your poor truck being crushed like styrofoam. How awful. I'll keep you in my prayers.
Take comfort in the fact that lemon deathtrap of yours is only operational 8 months a year!
The test for side impact wasn't done for 1998 and only detected in 1999 and corrected in 2000. If looking at the logic behind Toyota. In the model year 1998 they were busy fixing the one star front impact for 1997 and not realizing that the side impact testing in 1999 would reveal other design imperfections for the previous model year 1998 and prior.
I am sure a 3/4 will have a longer wheel base, and a transmission designed for heavy use. The much acclaimed (by bama) auxilary trans cooler is necessary for a car trans in a truck.
Harry
Truck Trend actually preferred the Tundra for towing a 5000lb trailer. They liked the maneuverability as well as the larger mirrors. One man's meat is a Chev owner's poison.
The Tundra is obviously the best 1/2 ton available, when they come out with a 3/4 ton, it will certainly be the most capable 3/4 ton.
kip
BTW does Toy even have a truck trans?
Good luck on this one now !
The Chevy Tahoes could not hold up to the rigors of patrol duty. They constantly broke dowm, were slow and had major brake problems.
These Tahoes had the heavy duty parts installed for police work and still failed.
I do have say that the Ford Crown Victoria is the standard police vehicle, takes a lot of abuse and does an excellent job for police/patrol work.
Good luck on this one now. :<)
Harry
Harry
Harry
Here in the rural mid-west, there aren't many that bought the Tundra.
I work on over a thousand vehicles a year, and before I was self employed, I worked on and drove about 1400 a year. Considering repeat customers, in the four decades I've worked on vehicles, I have driven over 25,000, including bull dozers, and two engine scrapers. I was in the SeaBees in Viet Nam working on construction equipment in the sixties. After my regular job, I worked for farmers hauling grain, and field work while I was in my twenties and early thirties. Whats your experience?
Harry
Harry
Based on his extensive experience he was able to come into the "Best Powertrain for Towing" thrad and declare the best tow rig for the original poster's question was a "blown Tacoma"! That silly guy who started the thread was interested in a 3/4 ton with a GM 8.1 or a Ford or Dodge v10. Luckily Bama showed up and set him straight before he made a mistake and bought a real truck!!
I've pulled light trailers all over the place with a few different 1/2 ton pickups and my current GM1500 Ext Cab 5.3L is the best 1/2 ton truck I've used as far as handling, stability and acceleration.
Never towed with a Tundra and judging by the way it squats so bad under light loads I don't want to. Maybe a Toyota 3/4 ton will be different but until then, I'll just stick to reading the magazine articles.