Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Diesel vs. Gasoline

1356711

Comments

  • barbellbarbell Member Posts: 15
    This sounds to me like some people who bought gas engines trying to justify. What is not figured in is the fact that a diesel will still be running strong at 250K or even 500K while your gas engine will have been replaced several times in that period. If you plan to trade every few years and don't tow anything of significance, go gas. Otherwise, a diesel is the only choice.
  • AirwolfAirwolf Member Posts: 142
    Stanford: Thanks for the calculation. I'll throw some of my own numbers at it, and you have a good point of adding in the extra cost of oil changes. Since most of the time I do it without thinking. I'm sorry that I might have triggered a second thought on your order! :)

    Thanks all for that add'l information. I am getting an F250SD and hadn't settled on an engine.

    Ryan
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Of course, the Ford V10 still puts out 410 lbft, or 50 more than my '93 diesel did when it was new. I know what you're saying -- I really love driving the diesel myself -- I'm just not sure that it is worth the money. If the extra 90 lb feet are that big a deal, a good pair of headers and a cat-back exhaust system will bring them back w/o overwhelming the stock transmission.

    High mileage diesels may bring more at resale, but not /that/ much more. Additionally, as someone (I forget who) pointed out, diesel maintenance on these new high-tech engines after warranty expiration can get very expensive. The prices I saw quoted were things like ~$750 per injector. A new crate V10 (not a rebuild) will probably run ~$1500 - $2000 from Ford... rebuilding it would be easy and inexpensive, if even necessary.

    I'm in the position here of trying to justify the diesel to myself, and failing. Especially on long trips, running the diesel at 75-80 mph for 1,000 miles does give me a bit of a headache. If anyone can punch through the financial argument I made above, I would actually appreciate it!

    Has anyone with the new '99 diesels been getting better than 18 or so mpg? I get 16 city and highway in my '93 non turbo stick, and folks I know with the '97 powerstroke were reporting 18 city 22 hwy. Have these gains really been lost?
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Of course, I also want the LS in a 350 dually. This means 4.10 gears (which I have now) when I was really looking forward to the 3.73s. Of course, the gas engine can handle 4.30 gears on a long highway trip better than the diesel can handle 4.10s. I may just get the LS and swap out the gears back down to 3.73s, but I shouldn't have to.

    Heck, Dodge is giving their diesels an option that's around 3.50 aren't they? That would actually seem to make a lot of sense for most recreational 1-ton drivers.
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    When Dodge and Ford eventually build a tranny that can handle 600 lb-ft of torque, won't there be a corresponding trade-off in fuel economy? If so, will we be hitting a point where the additional torque isn't worth the trade-off in economy? It seems as though 500 lb-ft of torque might be plenty for the average RVer towing a 25-35 foot fifth wheel, although I doubt I will ever hear anyone complain about having too much torque. I'm just curious about the potential fuel economy trade-off. If it is significant, I have to wonder if Ford and Dodge might start offering two diesel engines: one that caters to the RVer and a larger one that caters to the real heavy duty users who likely need the F-450 and F-550 trucks.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Actually, many of the things that can be done to increase the efficiency of the diesel will add torque and fuel economy, although they may make the total purchase price higher. Take a look at some of the products (and their 3rd party reviews) made by Gale Banks ( http://www.galebanks.com/ ). Some good info and stats on them can be found at http://www.dieselpage.com/ as well. Mileage and power can go hand in hand.

    If I do get the V10, I will probably get the powerpack for it (headers and exhaust). I haven't yet had a gas engine w/o a good aftermarket exhaust after all :-). With the diesel, I probably wouldn't bother with the whole system -- I might get the exhaust though.

    Of course, this defeats some of the detuning that Ford has done to ensure that the transmission doesn't blow up -- but that torque rating will be conservative. To Ford, a change from 1/10,000 failures to 1/5,000 failures is huge. For the average person, its meaningless (and transmissions aren't /that/ expensive).
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    Just out of curiousity, what does the powerpack (headers and exhaust) cost installed? How much torque and hp would it add to the 275/410 the V-10 already has? The new tranny is rated to 500 lb-ft. Do the headers make the engine louder?
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    And what is the impact on mpg?
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    I called them -- they don't have numbers for the V10 yet. Numbers for the 460 were in the region of 70 hp, 90 lb-ft and 15% better fuel economy. These numbers are not unreasonable, and I would expect similar results with the V10. The downside is the cost -- $1,800 or so. I doubt the engine would be more than 1-2db louder with the new system.

    However, this gives you a package that is as powerful as the diesel (albeit with a different power curve) and gets about the same mileage, for 1/2 the premium cost.

    I'm still hoping that someone will contradict my mileage stats, but for Fords it looks like 13/16 mpg for the V10 and 15/18 mpg for the diesel are not unreasonable. I'm definately not happy with that diesel mileage, considering that that's about what my '93 gets and comparing it to the Cummins' (and last years powerstroke for that matter).

    The diesel may well still be more reliable, but there's a good 2 rebuilds for the V10 possible even with the cost of a Powerpack system thrown in before you pay as much as the diesel. I'd like to see figures comparing mileage while towing for both diesel and gas, both with and w/o the addons, but that might take a while to get.

    For me, as much as I love the feel and power of the powerstroke, I'll probably order the V10 now. I only tow about 10% of my miles, and often take long trips (Texas to Wisconsin for example) where the added highway graces could come in handy, especially if I can't order the 3.73 gears.
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    So, it looks like probably 1.5 to 2 mpg more with the setup. That will improve mpg from the 10 to 13 average range to 11.5 to 15. That puts the payback time around 100,000 miles, which is pretty similar to the diesel payback time. You mentioned 13-16 mpg for the Ford V-10. I assume you mean after the exhaust upgrade. I've been hearing 9.5 to 13 with mixed driving for the Ford V-10, and those are with the 3.73. Occasionally, I'll hear a 14 or 15, but those are pretty rare.

    Why doesn't Ford offer a similar exhaust system as an option? It doesn't appear that the increased torque will overload the tranny since it is designed to handle the 500 lb-ft Powerstroke.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Actually, I was referring to the stock numbers. I've seen 13-16 mentioned on Edmunds (but not this chain, hmm) for the V10 ford.

    Factories don't like full length headers because they're a pain to make (have to be fabricated) and a real pain to install on an assembly line. Even 'premium' cars like the Cobra that get headers get shorty ones. For most people, the additional cost isn't worth the gains. For others -- there's always the aftermarket option :-)

    These are 50 state legal, btw.
  • AirwolfAirwolf Member Posts: 142
    Do you have a specific manuf. in mind for the catback/exhaust aftermarket system? After I buy this truck, I was planning to trick it out with a liner, catback system, rollbar, lights, winch, etc. over the next year or so. I have manuf. in mind for most of my toys, but not the catback/exhaust system. Any names would be appreciated.

    Thanks,
    Ryan
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Check out the PowerPack system from Gale Banks ( http://www.galebanks.com/GBford.html ). In final production for V10, should be available in 1-2 months for purchase.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Well, I went through the Ford SD groups here and got the following number. Please post to add or correct any information (unloaded given):

    USERNAME ENGINE MILEAGE
    kirkpama V10 12
    swanders V10 12
    droz V10 12.5
    brandot PSD 15
    glt PSD 18
    richflynn PSD 17
    nascar88 PSD 17
    hhm PSD 16 cty 24 hyw (20.5)
    retiree PSD 18

    This gives us ~12 mpg for the V10 and ~17.5 mpg for the PSD. Plugging those into the equation:

    GAS (12 mpg):
    Fuel costs: 417 gallons @ $1.10 = $458
    Oil change: Standard Jiffy Lube = $ 24
    ---
    Cost per 5,000 miles = $482

    DIESEL (17.5 mpg):
    Fuel costs: 227 gallons @ $1.10 = $285
    Oil change: 11 quart Jiffy Lube = $ 50
    ---
    Cost per 5,000 miles $335

    Or a cost per mile for the diesel engine of $0.0294. The current premium for the PSD is listed as $3493, which gives us 118,800 miles to the breakeven point. So not as bad as it could have been, but significantly over the 80,000 miles some people are claiming.
  • AirwolfAirwolf Member Posts: 142
    I just read (and accidentally tossed out) the latest copy of Four Wheeler which has a special section on Pros and Cons for nearly everything related to 4wheeling. One of the items was Diesel v. Gas, and the figures they used were pretty amazing. Based on their Pickup Truck of the Year tests, the diesel avg. 18.5 mpg and the gas 10mpg mostly city driving. When they calculated it out over the life of the gas engine 150,000 miles, the extra gas cost of $11,000 vs. the diesel more than paid in their opinion for the $4000 engine, including maintance, etc.
    Has anyone else seen this article? It's worth it to read, so we can comment... but it's a page long so if you don't want extra stuff, just read it at the newsstand. :)

    Cheers,
    Ryan
  • AirwolfAirwolf Member Posts: 142
    Beyond diesel, what types of gas does everyone use in their gas engines? Do you use "the good stuff" at 92/93 octane? I have to use that in my Cobra now and my cobra sucks gas big time. If 89 would work in my new F250, that'll save me even MORE money...

    Thanks,
    Ryan
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    18.5 vs. 10? Sounds like the Dodge. The Cummins is a very economical diesel, and their V10 sucks gas like you wouldn't believe. The breakeven point for Dodge was around 80,000 miles IIRC. Much more reasonable than the 160,000 mile point for the Powerstroke (neither includes maintenance).

    If Dodge made a crew cab -- and I picked them over Ford -- I would definately get the Cummins.
  • fredwoodfredwood Member Posts: 79
    Stanford,
    I saw a dodge crew cab the other day, almost drove my chevy off the road while rubbernecking. I'm not sure if it was custom or not but it sure looked factory.

    Airwolf,
    On a recent trip to the colorado river I refilled in arizona using my normal chevron 87 octane in our dodge motorhome. The gas was so bad that I had to stop in the middle of the desert to buy all the octane boost I could. The money I saved on the cheap gas was quickly lost with that bad batch. Anyway, I have a new theory on gas...day to day driving I'll use the 87 octane stuff but on long trips and/or towing I'm using only 92. I will also carry octane boost from now on in my truck and motorhome, just in case.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    I've seen a couple up North (Wisconsin). They all looked bone stock (apart from the extra 2 doors) so I doubt they were all that custom. I spoke to a Manufacturer's Rep down in Dallas and he said that they'd made a few as a trial and that the demand wasn't sufficient to make it a real option.

    Needless to say, this amazed me. If a crew cab Dodge was available I'd... well, it'd be a tough decision to make between it and the Ford. I like the SDs a lot, but [drool, groan] oh, that Cummins. Ah, well.

    --

    My last gas truck ('89 460) just got regular. There was no performance, mileage, or smoothness difference with higher octane gas whatsoever. I'll probably run 2,000 miles with each grade in the new truck (after break-in) just to see, but I've found that if you do long enough tests and log your consumption carefully that you don't see a gain (assuming no knocking with 87).
  • bigfurbigfur Member Posts: 649
    Well for deisel pricing some of you may faint to read this, so take a deep breath and hold still. In Apple Valley, Minnesota, it got deisel for .97 a gallon. not bad compaired to 1.10 for regular unleaded.
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    In Palisades Park, NJ, I buy diesel for 95.9 cents - same Sunoco station sells reg unleaded for 97.9, and this is FULL serve (no self-serve in NJ).
  • mharde2mharde2 Member Posts: 278
    In Texas the average price at truck stops is .95 and on a trip through Ark, Mo, Tenn, and Ky I saw Diesel as low as .88
  • richflynnrichflynn Member Posts: 147
    Just purchased diesel for 119.9 in LA area tonight. That's typical. The state adds .18 per gallon in taxes. Which brings up a couple of points. What are state taxes where the prices are so low? And where are the taxes being collected? (At the point of sale or by tax form at the end of the year.)

    A few years back I remember seeing outrageously low diesel prices in Utah. It was due to the truckers paying fuel taxes by tax forms once a month, quarter, year.... They had a permit number that was put on the truck stop's invoice for audit purposes. (Yeah right.) I paid at the tax at the POS because I didn't know what a permit number looked like.

    Rich
  • longhairlonghair Member Posts: 72
    I never really got into the details, but when I was driving commercially, I had to keep track of the mileage every time I crossed a state line, and the number of gallons bought in each state. The folks back in the office did some reporting using these numbers. If I drove more than I bought fuel, we were supposed to pay the taxes on the fuel that should have been bought. Conversely, If I bought lots of fuel, but didn't drive that many miles, that state owed us a rebate on the taxes. Sounded like a nightmare to me - I was glad I only had to write down the numbers.
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    I think I get it. If you drove lots of miles in their state, you wore down their roads more. As long as you bought gas in their state, you paid the tax to fix the roads. If you didn't drive in their state much but still bought lots of gas in their state, they owed you back some of those tax dollars. If you drove in their state alot but never bought gas in their state, they still want you to pay tax to fix their roads, so you owe them money.
  • longhairlonghair Member Posts: 72
    yep, that's about right.
    What always surprised me was that the fleet would get any taxes back. I expected each state to keep what they already got, but I guess the feds got involved in order to keep interstate commerce going.
  • boganrboganr Member Posts: 1
    I am considering the purchase of a 99 F250 supercab 4x4 LWB truck. What I can not make up my mind on is whether to go with the V10 or the PSD. I do not really tow anything but do pack a 8' camper around. I currently own a F350 4x4 that has been a very good truck except for the mileage. 10-11 highway and 8-9 town and off road both with the camper. Where gas stations are far and few, one really has to plan the trips and left with very little opportunity for unplanned side trips. I have seen very little concerning the pros and cons concerning the PSD in the off road arena. Any thoughts? Also have thought about going with the 4.30 rear end and then adding an after-market over-drive to use for the highway miles. In theory this would give the low off road gears and the higher highway gears. Is this flawed thinking?
  • jingojingo Member Posts: 10
    My wife and I just got back from test driving the PSD diesel. Some other things to consider: the diesel has a 5 year 100,000 mile wtty. and will probably bring a premium if the truck is sold with 150,000 miles on it. If it weren't for the noise, and the noise alone, it would be a much easier decision. I think the long term reliability and the increase in resale value will compensate for the additional initial cost. When we were tooling down the highway on the test drive, I kept picturing BJ and the Bear, with the little monkey pulling the air horn cord. :-) It's not quiet... I did test drive the V10 the other day and thought the truck was extremely quiet. Almost to luxury car levels. Good luck and I hope you don't have to order. The dealer told us 60 to 90 day wait!
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    The GM/Isuzu diesel was announced today:

    http://www.auto.com/industry/qgm9.htm

    6.6L V8 direct-injection turbo
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    If the factory isn't opening until 2000, it sounds like the new diesel won't be available for GM and Chevy trucks until MY2001 or MY2002 unless Isuzu will be making them somewhere else until the new factory opens. Anybody hear what kind of torque and hp they are expecting from the Isuzu?
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Isn't that when the new line of SD chevy's is supposed to be coming out anyway? I don't see them refitting the older models to accomodate them.
  • cdeancdean Member Posts: 1,110
    stanfords right, the engines will be out the same time the new heavy duty chevys will.

    the dealer i was at last weekend told me that he's heard between the lines that the new diesel will be in the 300 hp, 500 ftlb range. Y2000 is a ways off yet, and lots could change.
  • cdeancdean Member Posts: 1,110
    My father just recently ordered a '99 chevrolet 3500-HD cab and chassis. He is replacing his '94 diesel with a 454. I told him to try out ford's v10, but he is a little old-fashioned and wants something tried and proven.

    He told me he decided against the diesels and the powerstroke after talking to a couple of individual owners, 1 company owner with a fleet of powerstrokes, and another friend who mechanics at the local ford dealer. They all said the same thing. EXPENSIVE long term costs. The fellow who mechanics says all he does is replace powerstroke injectors and electronics everyday, all after warranty. Very few trucks, he says, leave the shop for less than $3K in repairs. When you pay $4500 for the engine to begin with, where are the savings?

    This trucks weighs 14000 empty. Thats a lot of load to tote around, and I wouldn't suspect the 454 to get better than 9~10 mpg with the 4.63 rear. Has anyone else put a gas motor on such a heavy truck before?

    If you wondering, the our friend with the fleet of superduty powerstrokes has them in trucks that all weigh about 11,000 empty, and with 5.13 rear, gets about 7-8 mpg. again, where is the savings?
  • gmacegmace Member Posts: 31
    After driving a diesel, you start to pick up on the negatives. Some I have noticed are the 15 quart oil changes, the pool of stink you stand in when fueling, the stinky fuel on the fuel nozzle at every fuel up, and waiting for that one pump at smaller stations. Everyone knows the sound pressure level annoyance. The only attraction the diesel has is living at 7000 feet in elevation, the turbo combined with the higher compression ratio means less power loss and probably no peak power loss. Non-turbo gas engines lose power at a rate of 3 to 4 percent for every 1000 feet increase in elevation. That would put the decrease at 21% for 7000 feet. The V10 peak power would be about 208 hp using 3.5% per 1000 feet. But since I will drive less than 20,000 miles per year and most will be to work and back at less than 15 miles, a diesel makes no sense for me with $3700 cost. Good point on the replacement cost for an engine. The guys that say diesels last forever are driving them at highway speeds and long distances (50,000 plus per year). Hell, a gas engine would last forever at those driving conditions especially with how much better engine oils are these days. You didn't mention that diesel fuel gels when cold and you have to switch to the winter grade (different cetane rating) which means lower mileage. Speaking of mileage, fuel is cheap compared to the other combined operating costs like tires, oil changes, filters, labor rates, belts, hoses, parts, glow plugs which are all more expensive for a compression ignition engine than comparable parts on a spark ignition engine. Make my crew 4x4 a V10. Still waiting since ordering in March. From one Mech ENG'r to another. Greg
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    (majored in MechE originally)

    Markbuck,

    One thing I will dispute with you. Yes, a diesel's hp peak is near its redline, but it's designed to run at redline all day. Unlike gasoline engines, diesels are intended for steady rpm workloads. You can run a diesel all day at redline and it will start right up after you turn it off. Been there done that with my Ram's Cummins. This is why most high-output generators are diesels - they can take the punishment of running at the same max-hp rpm all day long.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    I'd go with the diesel, but with the 3.73:1 gears. A little noisier in the cab, but plenty of power and great fuel economy (both on the highway and in town). Even with the $3500 premium it was a really close call for me getting the V10... I'm still wondering if I'll end up regretting it and swapping for a 2001 Powerstroke.
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    Airwolf,

    I felt I got my engine free because I paid $3600 under sticker anyway. That's strictly a matter of personal determination. Obviously, if the truck costs $3500 less, than the non-diesel would also cost that much less.

    I still measure a breakeven factor. For me, it's based on getting 50% better fuel economy, and paying the same for diesel as regular unleaded here in north NJ. I'll have broken even before the 5 year loan is up, so for me, it's a good deal.

    If your off-roading involves some pretty hefty bouncing from rough terrain, you will probably like the V10 better, because the diesel weighs substantially more and will cause a lot more downforce on your front end - could lead to premature suspension wear.

    Other than that, the diesel will give better fuel economy, will require about the same amount of maintenance, and will be louder. The V10 will be smoother, equal in towing power, and very sensitive to impurities thanks to all the computer controlled equipment.

    It's an honest toss up. I love my Cummins powered Ram, and here in NJ, a light duty diesel is exempt from all emissions testing (!), so I even have a little less aggravation at inspection.
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    Both the new diesels and the new V10s (Ford and Chevy) are heavily computerised. And in many states, vehicles with GVWRs over 8,500 lbs are exempt from emissions testing. I don't really see the gas engines as being more sensative to impurities than the diesels, or any other modern engine.
  • cdeancdean Member Posts: 1,110
    Airwolf

    Cost not a factor, I would probably want the diesel, due to performance.

    But factor in cost, and thats really what its all about. I travel East, central, and south texas, and diesel is generally priced in between 87 octane and 89 octane gasoline. (It has come down recent year.) So its very hard to make up the price difference over a gas motor on mileage alone, especially with recent gas motor improvs.

    But i seem to be the only one mentioning repair costs. New gas engines are excellent designed, and are long lasting. there is really nothing to wear out on them anymore, and i would say over 200k miles, a gas motor should reasonably need maybe just the peripherals replaced-(alternator, a/c, waterpump, etc.)

    But diesels are different. You've got high tech fuel pumps that generally cost over $1000-1500 to fix. I've never heard of a fuel pump making it over 100-120k. If it does last that long, engine power is poor. Chevy's fuel pumps are fancy electronic gadgets that generally last around 100k, and cost over $1400 to fix.

    Injectors are outrageous. the simple injectors like ford used to use in the 7.3 are no more. The Powerstroke gets its power basically from the fancy electric-hydraulic injector setup. but when it goes out, (between 100k-150k, from every PSD owner I know) they cost you big time. You could buy an entire gas motor for what you pay to fix a powerstroke.

    God be with your checking account if you turbo goes out.

    assuming gas motor lasts 250k miles

    gas motor costs(no fuel, no accessory repair)-- ~$500 for big block engine + 3 or 4 tuneups

    diesels-- ~$4500 for initial + 2x the cost for regular maintenance + ~$1500-$3500 for normal component wear (after many miles)


    the diesels don't last forever, and they are expensive to fix. mileage just can't make up for that difference.


    for folks like kcram, if they really get that good of a price on the truck and the fuel, then your only worry is the longevity. I haven't yet known of any major recurring problems with the Cummins, mainly cuz Dodge isn't into the fleets around here as much as GM and Ford, and I don't know any personal owners. i really don't know that much about the Cummins, other than stories from here.

    Anyway, from where i'm sitting, its going to be on a tank of gas.
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    stanford,

    Luckily, I still have the mechanical Cummins (1996), so the computer has nothing to do with the engine. When I said more sensitive, I was thinking more along the lines of carbon fouling, spark timing, and things like that which have no matching feature in diesels. Impurities was probably the wrong word to use. I had a spark plug die in my 302-powered F150, and the computer just about killed the whole powertrain. Both myself and the dealer initially thought the torque converter had died, because of how badly it was shifting. It took 2 hours of computer diagnostics to figure out the number 8 plug went, then just 15 minutes to fix. On a new diesel, the fuel injection is computer controlled, but the rest of the engine is still basically a hot-air explosion controlled by Mom Nature, not spark ignition controlled by Intel.

    cdean,

    All points well taken, and if I knew I couldn't recover the price, I'd probably still be burning unleaded myself. I too have heard nightmarish repair stories about the Ford/Navistar, which is one of the reasons I didn't go for the Ford. As for longevity, the Cummins is known to outlive the Navistar when properly maintained. The manufacturers only warrant the gas engines for 3/36, but the diesels are all 5/100. Cummins makes their own turbo unit (Navistar uses Garretts if I recall correctly), so the blower is up to the same standards as the engine. The other longevity issue could be perception and use. Diesels traditionally produce more torque, and are expected to see duty in an "abuse" environment where some feel a gas engine wouldn't stand up, thus diesels may die sooner than expected because of the workload. I would bet under *identical* operating conditions and proper scheduled maintenance, the diesel would outlive the gasoline engine.
  • gmacegmace Member Posts: 31
    I had a coworker tell me his owners manual for the Cummins claimed no power loss up to 14000 feet in elevation. The turbo on the PSD is attractive to me living at 7000 feet. But I ordered the V10 for lots of reasons including cost and break even. I know up here the V10 will only be making low 200's for HP. Boy if it was the same cost ~ $300 I'd have a really tough decision. Maintenance cost and frequency for power is a worthwhile tradeoff sometimes.

    Anybody else hear of the PSD hot start problems because of the electro-hydraulic injectors not working properly when the oil viscosity decreases?
    Physics still require a properly timed and proportioned injection(s) for a diesel to perform. Also check the post by markbuck.
    Greg
  • richflynnrichflynn Member Posts: 147
    gmace,

    Hot start problems?????

    Drive 100 miles across the desert with the A/C running, stop at a rest area long enough to, well... Restart the engine as normal. That's hot starting and no hint of a problem. In fact it starts quicker and easier BECAUSE of the heat in the engine.

    Rich
  • gmacegmace Member Posts: 31
    You wouldn't experience hot start problems due to the HEUI (hydraulic-actuated, electronically controlled unit injector) injector system because you don't have them in your 1992. You have regular diesel injectors that rely on just fuel pump pressure. Sure a hot engine turn over easily but it needs a high pressure fuel injection to start. Turbocharged engines run higher oil temps also, which would contribute to decreased oil viscosity and affect the function of the HEUI injector. BTW, what type of engineer are you?
    Greg
  • richflynnrichflynn Member Posts: 147
    Greg,
    The job title is System Engineer but most would call it Communications Network Engineer.
    Rich
  • SlocumSlocum Member Posts: 1
    What are the pros and cons of a diesel engine versus a gas engine for pulling a fifth wheel?
    We are looking at a Dodge Cummins- 24 valve diesel-3/4 ton-5.9 L engine and a Dodge 3/4 ton gasoline- V-10-8L. You seem to know your engines so I thought I'd respond with a question!
    Thanks!
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    First some questions: How heavy is the 5th wheel? What else will the truck be used for? How long do you intend to keep it (years and miles)?

    The main advantages of the diesel are unbeatable low end torque (vs. gas engines) and better mileage. The main disadvantages are a higher initial premium, higher cost regular maintenance (oil changes, etc) and greatly increased maintenance expenses after 100K miles.

    Scroll back through all responses in this forum -- you'll probably find the answer you're looking for. Give us more information about what you're wanting to do with the truck, and we can probably help you out a little more specifically :-)
  • wlbwlb Member Posts: 8
    Have there been previous responses about the actual gas mileage experienced with Ford V-10. I have just sold my 93 Cummins (resale was most definitely enhanced by the Cummins and the fact I had all service records and mileage statistics). There were a dozen buyers falling all over each other. I have NEVER had so many people wanting to buy my used truck, and I priced it over high retail. Amazing.

    I am thinking the V-10 to be a better choice for us now. We mostly carry a slide-in camper, do lots of long distance runs, and off-road a lot. Since we don't need pulling power (we've sold the 5th Wheel and no longer pull horse trailers)I just can't justify the diesel cost. I would like to hear from V-10 owners who have previously driven diesels. Are you satisfied?
  • stanfordstanford Member Posts: 606
    I really like mine (Ford). I didn't think I would. It has plenty of power, and is nice and quiet (a big plus for extended trips). The mileage is terrible, but the startup cost is so much less it works out alright. I get about 10mpg aggressively in Dallas traffic (60 miles a day, stop and go). I'm guessing 13ish on the highway at a reasonable pace.
  • wlbwlb Member Posts: 8
    standord: Thanks for quick response. Did you choose the V10 primarily because of initial cost? After getting 13-15 pulling and 18-21 empty, the V10 mileage figures I am hearing are very discouraging. But, we really got tired of the noise on long distance runs, and I really can do other things with the $4000 the diesel costs.
  • wlbwlb Member Posts: 8
    stanford: Whoops, sorry I mispelled you name on previous message. Fingers aren't working as well as they used to.
This discussion has been closed.