Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Diesel vs. Gasoline

1567911

Comments

  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    Every 7.3 goes 170,00 miles with no trouble and ever Isuzu breaks it's crank at 40,000 miles, right. Is that 7.3 a Powerstroke? Didn't think so. You do the math for me...
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    every(sp)Isuzu
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    mpazos,

    Is it really fair to compare the current Chevy diesel with the Cummins and Powerstroke? My friend has a 4.6L in his 2wd 1/2 ton and he thinks it's an awesome engine, but it isn't going to be pulling any heavy loads up the hills. That doesn't mean that it isn't a good engine, it's just not in the same class as the Cummins and Powerstroke. A Chevy truck with the current Chevy diesel is not going to come close to keeping pace with a similiarly equiped Dodge or Ford with the Cummins or PSD. Chevy recognized the shortcoming, which is why they contracted with Isuzu to build them a more competitive engine. The numbers speak for themselves.

    Dodge Cummins: 230hp, 450 torque
    Ford PSD: 235hp, 500 torque
    Chevy 6.5L: 195hp, 420 torque

    Dodge V-10 gas engine: 295hp, 425 torque*
    Ford V-10 gas (2000 MY): 310hp, 425 torque
    Chevy 7400 V-8 SF2: 290hp, 410 torque

    * I thought the Dodge V-10 was 300hp and 440 torque, so the figure quoted above may be incorrect. I also thought the Chevy was at 300hp.
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    Brutus,

    The Dodge V10 often gets misquoted for some reason.

    Emissions states:
    310 hp @ 4000 rpm, 440 lb-ft @ 2800 rpm
    federal states:
    310 hp @ 4000 rpm, 450 lb-ft @ 2800 rpm

    The slightly lower torque figure comes from the more restrictive exhaust, but that's about it.

    kcram
    Community Leader/Smart Shopper Conference
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    You are right, the Chev/DDC 6.5l does not have the numbers that the PS or Cummins has. The point I am trying to make is that for the GM brand loyal or dyed-in-the-wool the 6.5 is a very capable diesel engine. There is a guy in Montana, Jim Bigley, who is heavy into the 6.2 and 6.5 and also has a web page, www.62-65-dieselpage.com. He is building a 6.5 to compete against the PS and Cummins. Peninsular Marine builds a 6.5 that is rated at 350HP. I stick up for the 6.5 because I like the total package(engine,4L80E auto,14 bolt rear axle, cosmetics, IFS front end, etc..). If the 6.5 is a substandard power plant, I don't think AM General would be putting them in HUMVEEs(Hummers). BTW, current 6.5 comes from the factory rated at 215HP and 430 ft-lbs. On a final note, we both know people who buy diesel rigs who need them as much as a diarrhea clinic needs pay toilets.
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    That's why I own a gas Silverado ;0)

    So many of the diesel's bought by my co-workers are being used for around town commuting, not towing.

    My two cents is only buy a Diesel if you really need it. And all of Isuzu's BS about making diesels for 50yrs is only as good as they stand behind them. Hope Chevy stands behind their new joint venture Diesel.....
  • dodgeramdodgeram Member Posts: 202
    Anybody here heard what the numbers are for the new cummins ISH engine coming out mid season? I heard it's torque is going to be over 500, and horse power 250, is this true?
  • KCRamKCRam Member Posts: 3,516
    hi dodgeram

    The revised Cummins is still an ISB - the Dodge option code is ETH. It is only available with the 6 speed manual, and is rated at 245/505.

    kcram
    Community Leader/Smart Shopper Conference
  • causecause Member Posts: 1
    Maybe a little reassurance to GM diesel owners.Met a farmer with an abused 6.2d with 750,000 mi.never pulled a piston.Still in hard service.
  • steve168steve168 Member Posts: 1
    I think this site is great! I have learned alot and look forward to visiting here again.

    Now which to buy a Gas or a diesel? I have been looking at the Ford crew cab F250 4x2.
    I want to keep my next vehicle 10-20 years. I will not be towing very much at all, but i figured the diesel would last much longer with fewer problems over a long period of time. And i also like the rugged clatter ot the diesel, but this site has really confused me on which one will cost me more over the long haul. Are there a lot of problems with injectors or is this limited to a few horror stories? and how about the fuel pump, many problems with it?
    I see diesel gas prices aro $1.10 a gallon here in Houston. and i drive around 10 miles each way to work. Any advice from anyone who has owned a diesel is welcomed.
  • RichRich Member Posts: 128
    I was at Wal-Mart with my wife checking out cases to store her Beanie Babies. (Don't go there!) Anyway I checked out the oil for the diesel. There are several brands that meet the API grades as required by Ford. (And I assume others.) The Wal-Mart brand (Tech 2000 or something) is openly claimed to be made by Q-State. The price was $1.27 a quart. There also was Chevron Delo, Shell Rotella and some others. The Q was available in 2 gallon bottles, Chevron in cases of six one gallons and Rotella in gallons. Just a word to the wise, check the unlikely places before paying upwards of $3 at the local auto parts store.

    Rich
  • cdeancdean Member Posts: 1,110
    Steve168

    Do you want the diesel just for the diesel, or do you really need the 3/4 ton truck. You said you don't tow very much. If fuel mileage and longevity is your main concern, you could get a half ton truck with a small v8 that will do the job. Chevy's small v8's are getting the same fuel mileage as the Powerstroke, and you buy a cheaper truck and cheaper engine. Fords small v8s get real close the Chevy mileage, with just as good longevity. No doubt get the gas.

    Now if getting the Crew Cab is #1 concern, its different. the 5.4 would give you the best mileage, but has marginal power (maybe the Y2K are better). The v10 will give you about 5 to 6 mpg less than the diesel. But, the gas engines take virtually no maintenance, and will last just as long as the diesel. For Houston driving, you will probably get only around 16-17 with the diesel, and about 12 with the gas. For the extra $4500, and the added cost of very expensive oil changes, it will take a long time to recoup that initial investment, depending on how many miles you drive/year. Especially since in Texas, diesel is pretty much always the exact same or close to the price of gas. sounds like resale is a non-issue.

    I would get the v10. but, if you really want the diesel, get what makes you happy.

    I have yet to hear of any mechanical longterm probs with the new powerstrokes, i know of quite a few in service. but none of them really have lots of miles on them yet.
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    Is there a noticeable difference in MPG's with the 3.73 gears and 4.30? I put together a Ford F250 SD Supercab(on paper) and it doesn't seem to like the 4.10 gears. What would be the better gear ratio for the above mentioned truck loaded with a slide-in camper? Thanks in advance...
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    I have the V-10 with the 4.30s on a 99 dually with a slide-in camper. I like the 4.30s, but mpg was never a big issue for me. Running empty, I get 10-10.5 in a mix of city/hwy and 11.5-12 on the hwy. With the 3.73s, you should get 2 mpg better. The 3.73s will still provide plenty of power with the camper on. You will be driving out of OD more often with the camper on, but most people find that to be an acceptable trade-off for the increased mpg.

    The V-10 doesn't have a 4.10 option. It's my understanding that the V-10/4.10 combo didn't work as efficiently as the V-10/4.30 combo.
  • dwyckoffdwyckoff Member Posts: 2
    This is a good forum. I have yet to see a concise explanation for diesel engine properties. I'm not a mechanic, but do have a working knowledge of hydrocarbon chemistry and physics. Here is my understanding on a few things:

    1 Diesel engines get better mileage than gas because diesel fuel has a greater energy storage density. If you burn a pint of diesel, it gives up more heat than a pint of gas. The same is true for methane (natural gas) vs butane or propane. There is simply more stored energy in diesel fuel than gasoline.
    2 The increased torque of diesel engines is partly due to the engine geometry. Diesels have a long stroke. The piston is acted upon by expanding gases for a longer time than in gasoline engines. This is also why a rifle bullet goes faster than a handgun bullet. In guns, barrel length is the "stroke".

    3 Diesel engine longevity is partly due to the fact that the fuel itself has some lubricating properties. This is obvious if you've ever had diesel on your hands. It is slick. Gas is not. Some fuel ends up on the cylinder walls - making life easier for the piston rings. Engine oil does this also, but the more the better when it comes to lubrication.

    I've had a diesel (a Mitsubishi) for 18 years, 250K miles. It is the highest quality truck of any type I've ever owned. Some of the reasons I love it are not mentioned in any of the other postings.

    In my opinion diesels make the best 4 wheel drives. They crawl and down anything. You don't need to use the brakes near as much as with gas engines because the engine acts as an air brake. This is particularly appreciated on snow & ice. I've noticed that I can decelerate on ice by simply taking my foot off the accelerator. This has saved me many a time here in the Colorado mountains.
    I went 175K miles on one clutch - and had much life left in it - but changed it when a transmission output bearing went. I feel this is because of the high torque properties of the diesel. You don't need to "feather" the clutch. Just put it in gear and lift you foot off. The engine will not stall unless you're a complete idiot.

    One last point - if you need to 4 wheel through deep water - a diesel is a blessing. They do not suffer from the ignition problems of gas engines when wet.


    I'm in the market for a new diesel truck - and thinking Ford or Dodge. I'd like for it to be the last truck I buy. I haul heavy trailers around - often in 4 wheel drive and sometimes in the mud. I really need a truck to stand up to extreme conditions. Any advice is appreciated.
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    In every road test that I have read in Trailer Life Magazine, they have consistently said that engine braking with a diesel is not near as effective as engine braking with a gas engine. They always recommend an after market air brake for trucks with diesel engines when pulling heavy trailers. Trailer Life is naturally bias towards diesels since diesels are more effective haulers of heavy trailers. This is actually the only area that I can remember that they have said that a gas engine is more effective.

    From personal experience, I can say that I was impressed with the engine braking on my V-10. I drove up to Alaska this past January, so I got to test the effectiveness of the engine braking in some mountain passes in winter conditions with my slide-in camper in the bed.

    I suspect my next truck will be a diesel. Up here in Alaska, though, I know people who make sure they start their trucks up at the office every few hours when we get a real cold snap. That concerns me a little, especially if I do some winter camping. Then again, I could always plug the block heater into my camper and crank up the generator every now and then. I've got several years to think about it.
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    For the same reason diesel engines operate at very high compression ratios(higher tolerances, closed combustion chamber) they are more proficient at expelling the exhaust gases, thus less engine braking. A gas engine has better engine braking due to the inefficiency in which it expels exhaust gas. A true diesel engine brake works by retarding the engine timing and making the engine work against itself(Jake brake). There are also diesel exhaust brakes that increase the exhaust back pressure, but they are not as proficient.
  • dwyckoffdwyckoff Member Posts: 2
    Hmmm ...
    I have not read any Trailer Life reviews on engine braking. I base my statements on experience with my own Mitsubishi turbo diesel. When I take my foot off the accelerator, engine braking is extremely effective - much more so than with any gas engine I've ever driven. Maybe Mitsubishi has figured something out that other manufacturers have not.
    As I understand it, engine braking takes place as on the upstroke - as air is compressed with the valves closed. This occurs on the compression and ignition strokes. I suspect the key to getting good engine braking is that no fuel (or very little fuel) is injected on the ignition stroke. The amount of fuel injected should be minimal when your foot is off the accelerator - just enough to keep the engine at idle. A good monitoring computer should be able to determine if the truck is sitting at a stop light (hence needs some fuel on the ignition stroke) or going down a steep hill (hence needs no fuel).

    If you are not getting good engine braking with a diesel I'd say too much fuel is being sent to the cylinder. If, say, you were going downhill - and took your foot off the accelerator - and no fuel was being injected - a diesel should provide superior engine braking. It takes more energy to compress air to 1/20th it's original volume than to 1/10th. With no throttle, this energy is taken from the trucks momentum - slowing it down.

    I'm very curious why other diesels don't get good engine braking. It's one of the main reasons I like mine. Any theories?
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    We can go back and forth forever on this. Your Mitsu has better engine braking than all other diesels on the road. OK. I was just trying to explain why the diesel engine, by design, is less effective as a compression brake than a gas engine. Read from the expert.
    http://www.jakebrake.com/ After reading this you should understand the energy returned (on the compression stroke) to the driving wheels is due to the high compression ratio and not the metering of fuel.
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    When you close the intake butterfly's on an engine, this is the major source of engine braking.
    Gas motors have butterfly's, diesels just have big holes between the air filter and intake valves, thus....

    Diesel's don't have much inherent engine braking.

    Good exchange of info though the last several posts. I'd go Cummins for long engine life.....
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    No throttle butterfly! Thanks Mark.

    I'd be happy with Cummins long life or Navastar power. But would not choose either, without thinking about the new Duramax 6.6 with Allison 5 spd automatic.
  • mdavid3mdavid3 Member Posts: 2
    What is the new duramax? is this the new chevy engine?

    I have driven a 36 foot motorhome with a cummins and a Kenworth T-600 and both of them will actualy pick up speed going down a hill with-out the use of a Jake Brake. To see for your self just go down I5 just past the "Grape vine" in CA. One thing no one has mentioned is that one of the big reasons that diesels last longer is because they turn 1/3-1/2 the RPM's of a gas engine.

    Now, according to Car and Driver TV, the torque on the Dodge is cut back when you get the automatic; does this mean there is a problem with the transmission?
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    The intake valves are closed during the compression stroke. Don't get it...
  • poconopocono Member Posts: 2
    Can anyone out there with a 1999/2000 F-250 or F350, 7.3L, tell me what kind of mpg they are getting. I don't mean how often they fill up or how many dollars they put in for the week, but actual mpg.

    Thanks
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    Think of engines as BIG air pumps.

    Every two times they go around (4strokes) they attempt to draw in their displacement of air.

    On a diesel, they do, and the only work the engine is performing at small throttle settings is compressing the air followed by allowing the air to expand during the power stroke giving back most of the work.
    On an otto cycle motor (gas), the butterflys are completely shut and the motor is working against a large vacuum found in the intake manifold. This is the source of engine braking. (sorta like your vacuum cleaner when you cover the end of the hose).

    That help?
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    Markbuck,

    If you are going to use terms like otto cycle I'll believe you. So let me get this straight - my gas engine brakes better because it has a vacuum cleaner in it.

    Make sense to me - how often do I change the bag?

    Only kidding, this certainly clears it up for me.

    Thanks
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    You see, the hoover has the dirtbag underneath and .....

    Sorry to all my Harley buddies....
  • rufarcirufarci Member Posts: 5
    Has anyone checked out the "blueovalnews.com"

    site? its an unofficial Ford site. they write about a V-6 version of the powerstroke for their smaller trucks. anyone heard about this?

    why don't other manufacturers put diesels in their vehicles besides 3/4 and one ton pickups--in europe and south america, diesels are often found in smaller trucks, cars, and suvs.

    I've seen a diesel Grand Cherokee in Italy--ie: better milage/better torque.

    I wish I could plant that idea in the automaker's heads--maybe with all the popularity of the newer diesels in full size trucks, and higher gas prices, the idea might catch on.
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    When Ford extended their contract with Navistar about a year or so ago, they mentioned that Navistar was going to be designing a diesel for some of their smaller trucks, such as the Explorer. I haven't heard how far along they are yet.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    FYI - rufarci mentioned this website. Ford have just lost a major courtcase against this site. The site seems to have a number of people supplying information from inside of Ford.

    I assume that if Ford was prepared to spend a lot of money trying to close them down they must have got a few things right.

    Chalk one up for free speech.
  • speedster121speedster121 Member Posts: 3
    I'm about to purchase an F250 SD CrewCab, but after reading this ENTIRE topic (every, single posting) I still cannot decide between the PowerStroke and the V-10. I only tow a 4500# boat in the summer months. Other than that I don't tow. However, I do have an unexpected sum of money for the purchase of this price. Therefore, money spent NOW, is not as much of a concern as money spent LATER. From the postings, I've decided that the 3.73 is the right ratio for me. Is this correct, for better mileage? Is it true that the diesel will only run around 70mph open on the highway? As far as mileage, just a 4mpg difference comes out to 120 miles on each tank. That seems like a fairly significant advantage for the diesel to me. I drive about 20-25 miles each way to and from work. Any comments, suggestions, or pointers would be greatly appreciated, as I am a trucking novice.
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    I don't know if the PS is governed to a certain rpm, but my 6.5 will go much faster than the 85MPH speedo, although at that speed I would be wasting alot of fuel. The higher the gear ratio(the lower the number: 3.73 is higher than 4.10) the better the fuel mileage, as a general rule.
  • lwittorflwittorf Member Posts: 96
    I have owned both 6.2 & the ps ford and gas rigs. Unless you are going to tow or haul a lot the gas is a better route to go. Yes the ps takes 14 qts of oil plus a 15.00 filter.I had a guy figure it out and the diesel will only pay for it self after 120,000 miles. Also if you have to replace either the gas is about 1/2 or less. all that said I still like the diesel but I now have gas because of the extra 4,000 $ at the start for the diesel.
  • blugillblugill Member Posts: 36
    What if gas prices increase again? If you drive 120,000 miles a year, the diesle will pay for itself in a year. If you drive 20,000 miles a year it will be less then 6 years because gas will go up, and every penny gas increases, decreases the time for the diesel to pay for itslef, assuming diesel goes up by the same amount.
  • jasonpeterclarjasonpeterclar Member Posts: 30
    Yes, gas engine, throttle closed, creates manifold vacuum, engine tries to suck air in on intake stroke, it cannot in the vacuum, piston is actually being sucked back towards the head as it moves away from it, creating rod load reversal, resistance to rotation and engine braking. Diesel's have no throttle, hence no vacuum can be created, devices exist to artificially created resistance to air flow in the engine, like exhaust brakes. Most commercial diesels have them.

    And diesel's efficiency over gasoline engines simply comes from the higher compression ratio. Higher pressure = higher combustion temperatures, higher temperature = higher thermal efficiency. The fuel's BTU/lb rating has nothing to do with it. Think about low compression (8:1) gas engines vs. higher compression (10:1) gas engines, the higher compression engines always have more power for a given size. They also need a fuel with higher autoignition resistance (higher octane) to keep detonation from ocurring. Diesel's (22:1) detonate on purpose, they ignite the fuel by compressing it in a cylinder with air until the combination spontaneously ignites from the heat of compression. It's inherently more efficient than spark ignition. Because they are high compression engines and designed to detonate, they are heavily built, big and thick, crank, rods, pistons, extra rings, heavy iron heads, etc. Because of this, and the fact that diesel fuel is a few steps closer to lubricating oil than gasoline, the engines typically last a lot longer. Because the compression ratio is so high, diesels are not tolerant of water intake like a gasoline engine. No clearance in the combustion chamber. Water doesn't compress well.
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    Diesel cycle lower efficiency than otto cycle (gas)

    Makes up for efficiency by higher compression ratio and more BTU's per gallon.
  • ckitchensckitchens Member Posts: 67
    I have every respect for the new diesels in personal use vehicles. But, do you really need it? Do you want the maintenance costs, noise, huge possible repair bills and truly nasty fuel that can be spotty to find in rural areas? My husband works construction and deals with diesel equipment everyday. Even though I have often thought that a diesel engine would be a good way to go - he keeps saying no way. When I talk with a Ford dealer regarding my usage and any desire for a diesel - they also say no way (unless I buy a 5th wheel to use a lot). We tend to buy Ford trucks - just due to our very good experiences of over 2 million miles of fairly hard usage. We haul boats and an overhead camper from time to time and we live at high altitude (not to speak of daily rough and steep dirt/gravel roads). But, I guess both my husband and dealer may be right. Our 1988 F-250 with 460 and 4X4 (ordered with 3.55 gears) has a great history of handling everything we have dealt it - including getting stuck in mud with both the boats and camper (we tend to avoid real boat ramps). It is a 5-speed manual transmission, which back in 1988 was a good choice for gas mileage. We average about 13 mpg on the highway unloaded - have seen a little over 15 in lower altitudes. With the camper, mileage is awful - anywhere from 8 to 11 mpg mostly depending on wind. But, to tell you the truth - I doubt that the gas consumption vs. diesel has even equalled the original cost of the diesel engine - we have driven this truck with the camper about 40,000 miles, boats don't matter much. The engine has required very little in repairs - at nearly 150,000 miles it neither leaks or uses oil and truly pulls better than when new. And, everything else from alternators to water pumps and ? will cost more to replace with the diesel. Maybe the transmission and transfer case last a little longer too without the torque surge from the diesel. No, we really don't need a diesel - do you? (Maybe I should mention - I drive a new F150 with 5.4 that just loves getting 16-17 mpg at high altitude running 80+ mph. This is the truck we use for light duty use. Just keeping the old F-250 for the camper and towing.)
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    AMEN #462.
  • comptimecomptime Member Posts: 19
    LIKE THE OTHERS IT HAS TAKEN QUITE A WHILE TO GO THRU THE LIST.I WILL BE ORDERING A 2500 RAM QUAD CAB 4X4 IN JAN. THE QUESTION I ASK IS WHAT ENGINE SHOULD I ORDER? I DRIVE ABOUT 12 TO 15K A YEAR. I HAVE A 28FT FOUR WINNS WHICH THE FACTORY TELLS ME IT WILL WEIGH ABOUT 9200 LBS ON A TRAILER UNLOADED... I'M ONLY GOING TO TOW IN THE SPRING AND FALL TO PUT THE BOAT IN AND OUT AND ONE TRIP MAYBE TWO TO NORTHERN MICHIGAN (ABOUT 500 MILES ROUND TRIP) I WOULD LIKE THE DIESEL BUT I DONT THINK I WILL GET MY MONEYS WORTH BECAUSE OF THE DISTANCE I TRAVEL.. DO YOU GUYS THINK I CAN GET AWAY WITH THE 360 OR DO I HAVE TO BITE THE BULLET AND GET THE V10 AND GET AN CREDIT INCREASE ON MY GAS CARD?
  • ckitchensckitchens Member Posts: 67
    That's a tough one. Would hate to think you need to buy a $4,500 diesel engine for occasional use. Have you considered that you could hire someone to haul your boat for the opposing cost?
    Your problem is similar to most - need the engine occasionally, but not likely to recover the cost over a period of time. I would probably opt for the 360, but that is one heavy boat. Most people in our area with that size of boat find storage and only haul the boat in the local area. (For an occasional trip elsewhere, you could buy a nice run-about for less than the price of the diesel and easily haul it anywhere with the 360.) Good luck - have friends with the Dodge diesel and they usually love it - until they have to replace any parts. Major ouch.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    When I started to read your post I thought - easy, go gas it is only a 28'. But then I read the weight and something seemed wrong. Are you sure that the Four Winns is that heavy, even with the trailer. I would check it out.
  • muzzydmuzzyd Member Posts: 12
    All this talk about diesel vs gas is to much. The
    same things are being said over and over. In a nut
    shell if your going to own your truck for a long
    period of time ie; 4or more years and tow heavy
    loads frequently then diesel is the way to go.
    If your ride is more for pleasure than work go
    gas. Believe me I've tried both and the noise of a
    rattling diesel is something you can't hide.
    I personaly agonized over my last purchase for
    quite awhile. I needed a truck with space(quad
    cab)that I could drive every day to work in
    comfort. But I also own a 5th wheel that weighs in
    at 95k loaded. I eliminated the Ford based on
    engine noise and cost. This left me with Dodge(I
    considered Chevy/GMC but just didn't like em.)which wasn't to hard of a choice seeing as I had previously owned a 94' RAM 1500 w/5.9L 2WD that served me well. When I factored in the average miles per year I would put on the truck would not exceed 10K, I figured the extra 4K for the diesel would be hard to justify. I finally bought a 99' RAM 2500 quad cab 4WD w/5.9L SB automatic. I have pulled the camper four times and have found the engine/tranny do very well at about 60 mph. The gas mileage locally is about 12, towing is about 8.5 mpg. It's a matter of individual choice and how much you want to spend. I specd. mine with a special request 3.73 gears. Most sales people dont know what is available but service managers do. I've had mine for 9 months now with no problems and a whole lot of enjoyment. And I can still use the drive thru's.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    Muzzyd - you say, and I quote, "All this talk about diesel vs gas is to much. The same things are being said over and over".

    Let me therefore ask you a question WHY DID YOU POST THIS TWICE?????
  • gwmooregwmoore Member Posts: 230
    I just checked out this forum for the first time, so forgive me if you guys have covered this. In our '97 2500 Ram Cummins (Auto), the tranny shifts down 2 gears when pulling a hill or I kick the overdrive off. You find yourself at too high RPMs if you try to go 55-65 mph. I know the engine has plenty of torque to use a higher gear, but it is a trick to get the engine into that gear. This was a universal issue, not just our truck. Now I know there was an aftermarket fix for the problem, but I was wondering if Dodge has improved this. Also, anyone know if Dodge has any plans to offer a compression brake option for the Cummins? KCram, they don't have immediate plans to upgrade the Cummins for the automatic like the 5-speed?

    Sorry Andy, didn't mean to make you go through this at this forum.
  • gwmooregwmoore Member Posts: 230
    Brett039,

    When pulling a steep hill, and the auto downshifts or I manually kick the overdrive off, the tranny skips too far down. Hence, the very high RPMs. Like I said, there is that one-higher gear that could easily pull the hill at reasonable RPMs with all that torque, but you have to trick the transmission into it. The Cummins I frequently drive is my dad's, and he is the one that checked on the aftermarket fix for the problem. I will try to get in touch with him to find out what the fix was for you. But I would think someone else here would know what I am talking about. Evidently Dodge has not changed this if you are having the same problem with your '99.
  • mpazosmpazos Member Posts: 42
    Could this be what is happening?: You accelerate going uphill or disable the OD. The torque converter unlocks and the trans down shifts, so it feels like you are down shifting 2 gears and the rpms go way up. This was happening with my Chev w/4L80E(HD auto) trans so I did the following experiment while towing my boat. On approach to an uphill run I put the trans in '3'. During the climb uphill, I put the trans in 'OD'. If the hill was not too steep for the load, the trans would shift to 'OD'. At the crest of the hill, I would feel another 'shift'. This is the TC locking. The trans up and down shifting when towing(hunting gears) is what causes extreme temps in the trans so you are better off leaving the trans in a lower gear. This is also why serious tow rigs have straight drives(manual trans).
    PS This is not to say one cannot tow a lot with an auto trans, but a manual offers some towing benefits an auto does not. And this is from someone with an auto.
  • cchilescchiles Member Posts: 1
    Ok - Appears to be a fair number of opinions out there on the diesel vs. gasoline issue.

    I have an 18' ski boat that weighs approximately 2500 lbs. My 99 expedition w/5.4 pulls it like a champ. I plan to purchase a F-250 Superduty along with a slide-in camper this Spring. Standard motor is a 5.4, for $600 - I can upgrade to the V-10. For $4600 - I can upgrade to the diesel. The truck will also be used for a work vehicle. I drive approximately 22,000 miles per year. I am told by the local dealer the 5.4 will do everything I need it to do. I like the V-10 option, but don't want to suffer on the gas mileage (i.e., 12 miles/gallon unloaded). Is it wise to spring for the diesel and get equivalent gas mileage as with the 5.4 (15-17 miles/gallon)? Hints: Pull the boat twice a month on average. Will use the camper, along with the boat, twice a month during the spring. and summer. Most importantly, I am not independently wealthy.
  • markbuckmarkbuck Member Posts: 1,021
    Better go F350 with a V10

    My buddies F350SD with V10 only rated for 2200 lbs camper rating. With diesel you get even less bed rating.

    Buddies V10 3.73 gets about 13.5 on the highway
  • BrutusBrutus Member Posts: 1,113
    You won't get the same gas mileage with the 5.4 in the Superduty that you get with the Explorer. The Superduty weighs close to 7,000 pounds. With the V-10 and 3.73 rearend, the average hwy mpg appears to be in the 14 range with some figures of 15-16 being reported. The 5.4 is not going to do much better than that, if at all. I had the 351 in my 1992 F-250 4x4 and it worked great, but that truck only weighed 5,300 pounds. I can almost guarantee that you will feel significantly underpowered with the 5.4 with a slide-in camper and a towing a boat.

    That brings me to another question. How heavy is your slide-in camper? Make sure you crunch some numbers. Unless you have a pop-up truck camper or the camper is specifically designed as a light weight model for smaller pickups, you will likely be way overweight with a 3/4 ton truck. Airbags and possibily adjustable shocks will be required. The GVWR of the 3.4 ton is 8,800 pounds. If the truck weighs 6,800 or so, that leaves you 2,000 pounds for the camper, your gear, you, your passengers and the tongue weight of the boat. The one ton GVWR is 9,900, so that gives you an extra 1,000 pounds. The GVWR of the 1 ton dually is 11,200.

    When I ordered my truck, I had a slide-in camper in mind. I initially ordered a 99 F-350 Single Rear Wheel. After I crunched the numbers, I changed my order to a dually and have had no regrets. I did get a large, deluxe, slide-in camper (It's 10'11"). The advertised dry weight of the camper is 2,900 pounds. The options added another 1,000, so the camper weighs 3,900. The truck weighs 7,100 pounds. Loaded for a trip, I tip the scales around 12,000 pounds including gear and passengers.

    The truck handles the weight great, but I am still squatting a little in the back. I know that will have consequences in the long run for the suspension and brakes, as well as having an impact on the current handling. I plan to add air bags and/or adjustable shocks in the near future. Like I said, it handles good now. I've got over 22,000 miles on the truck with 8-10,000 of that with the camper on.

    My only advice is to make sure to do the research and crunch the numbers if you're contemplating a slide-in truck camper. They're heavier than most people think. Pulling a trailer is a totally different ballgame. The convential tow rating is 10,000 pounds and the GCVR is 20,000 pounds. The GCVR and tow rating are irrelevant when it comes to slide-in campers. It's the GVWR that you need to be concerned with.

    As for diesel vs gas, you could probably justify the break-even at the gas pump if you are putting 22,000 miles per year on the truck. Of course, the diesel engine weighs about 700 pounds more than the V-10, which further restricts the payload capacity before you hit the GVWR.

    I have the 4.30 axle ratio with the V-10. It cost me a couple of mpg running empty compared to the V-10 with the 3.73. With the 4.30s, I get 10ish in a combo of city/hwy and 11.5-12 on the hwy. I get 8.5-9 with the camper on. I don't think the someone with a V-10 and 3.73s will do 2mpg better than me with a similar load. It's running empty where you really notice the difference. I had the opportunity to compare notes with someone who owns an almost identical truck and has the same camper as I have. The only difference is that he has the diesel. He averages 13.5 with the camper on, so he is doing about 4.5-5mpg better with the diesel carrying the same load. The diesel will do 5-7 mpg better than the V-10 running empty.
  • ckitchensckitchens Member Posts: 67
    We have been hauling a 10 foot Scamper (light-weight, in theory - and pop-top) self-contained overhead camper for years. Let me tell you - the drag on your truck is significant. Reference previous posts, but we are using an older F-250 with 460 cid engine. It handles the camper well (with trailer/camper option) and the engine/drivetrain has never been a problem. But, my point - don't discount the camper. Personally, we'll never buy another pick-up camper. If we want another camper, we'll probably buy a van conversion motor home - or even more likely, rent one when we need it. You will need a pretty heavy duty truck and strong engine to pull this camper - especially with a boat. Don't underestimate the weight and handling perimeters that you are likely to experience - in our case at high altitude in the Rockies, a big headwind and/or crosswind can be a major headache with the camper. (By the way - forget gas mileage with the camper - it will be about as bad as you are likely to imagine.)
This discussion has been closed.