Lookout Ford, Dodge, Chevy: Here comes T150

1356710

Comments

  • malibu1malibu1 Member Posts: 52
    Toyota making a full size pick-up is like Bill Clinton writing a book on the evils of extra-marital sex......it just ain't going to work and nobody is going to buy it........
  • mackabeemackabee Member Posts: 4,709
    Sure, that's what they said about Lexus.

    : )

    Mackabee
  • h8gmh8gm Member Posts: 2
    Toyota makes good stuff,
    its the little things that
    break on the damn things
    like switches, plastics,bearings
    clutches, but they are damn expensive
    to fix. My fathers 4runner is good,
    dependable, but every month or so he
    is putting another $500 into it.
    I think a full size toyota would not fit
    in the market paced by the big 3.
    if im gonna tow I want that v10 or
    D.I. deisel and years of experience
    that comes with american. sport ute's
    maybe toyota, but trucks, american.
  • garlicfoggarlicfog Member Posts: 4
    I liked the mid-sized Toyota T100 and would have bought one this year, but with Toyota going to a full sized truck they lost me, if I was going to buy a full sized truck I'b buy a Ford or a Dodge. As it is I am planning to buy the new Nissan Frontier Crew Cab being released in May. It's been offered in Europe and Australia for years now as the Navara Dual Cab and is the best of both worlds, half a Pathfinder and half a Frontier Pickup.
  • weslwesl Member Posts: 53
    garlicfog,
    The new Tundra still does not have towing capabilities, engine choices, and chassis variations to compete with the domestics. My guess is that the Tundra will garner sales mostly from the Dakota and current Toyota owners. Who knows. Later, Wes.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Toyota is wading into deep water on this one. The big 3 have this market wrapped up pretty tight. As far as all the different types of drive trains, engines and configurations between the big three you can find anything you want. The V8 they offer doesn't give the torque (what a truck really needs) the big 3 can offer. If anything It will draw people who don't really use a truck for hard work, hunting, or pulling heavy loads. The T150 may take sales away from the Dodge Dakota. But the Dakota still offers a pretty potent V8 option. It will have to earn its respect in the big truck world, and it isn't going to be easy.
  • ccollins460ccollins460 Member Posts: 2
    If the engine vibrates like the 1998 Toyota Tacoma
    4 cyl. engine, forget it.
  • weslwesl Member Posts: 53
    Rcn,
    I feel the Tundra should do well, but based on Toyotas passed performance no one really knows what will happen. My only disappointment is the extremely limited number of choices when purchasing a Tundra. With the exception of one Cadillac, the only company I have bought from is Ford. I like the idea that whatever car or truck I want Ford will probably have for me to purchase. If I have an F-150 but my needs change Ford has plenty of other options to choose from. Customer loyalty with trucks is something Toyota is ignoring with the one flavor only Tundra. Later, Wes.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    The Toyota Tundra will be fighting an upmountain battle against Ford, Dodge, Chevy. Although the V8 pwr/torque is available, you must also think of refinement, ride, look, feel, styling. The T100 was no head turner. T150 is no better (in my opinion). Ford, Dodge, Chevy have had 40 years+ of building large trucks. The one thing Toyota seems to have forgotten is Americans like choices, lots of them.
  • xl_1228xl_1228 Member Posts: 29
    I just saw the Toyota Tundra. I just about fell out of my chair! It looks just like a little F150! The headlights, hood, and bumper look almost the same, with only very slight differences.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I checked out the toyota truck at the Chicago auto show and I don't think that they stand a chance against the big three. They make a good car and a long lasting baby truck ( but not rugged ). This is a market that they don't have a handle on.
  • Toyota17Toyota17 Member Posts: 15
    FULL-SIZE TOYOTA TUNDRA PICKUP WILL COMBINE VALUE,


    Quality and Industry-Leading Features

    TORRANCE, Calif., March 10 /PRNewswire/ -- When it
    goes on sale in early June, the all-new 2000
    model-year Toyota Tundra will enter the full-size
    pickup truck market with an impressive resume of
    value, quality and industry- leading features.

    The Tundra will be built exclusively at Toyota
    Motor Manufacturing, Indiana (TMMI), an all-new
    $1.2-billion facility located in Gibson County,
    near the city of Princeton. It will ride on an
    all-new chassis that will help set a full-size
    pickup benchmark for handling, ride comfort and
    interior noise isolation.

    Featuring the most sophisticated powerplant ever
    offered in a full-size pickup, Tundra's optional
    i-Force 245 horsepower 4.7-liter engine will be the
    first double-overhead cam, 32-valve V8 ever
    offered in the segment. Derived from the powerful
    engine used in the legendary Toyota Land Cruiser,
    it will provide a high level of smoothness and
    quietness. It also will be one of the first V8
    engines in the segment to achieve an L.E.V.
    (low-emission vehicle) emissions classification
    from the EPA, and will achieve good fuel
    efficiency.

    Tundra will be available in three grades -- base,
    SR5 and Limited. It will be powered by either a V8
    or V6 engine, including two- or four-wheel drive,
    two-door regular cab with an eight-foot bed or
    four-door Access Cab with a six and-a-half-foot
    bed.

    The new Access Cab features large double-doors and
    one of the most expansive entry areas in the
    segment. It also is the only four-door pickup to
    feature an exterior handle on each door providing
    easier operation from the outside than the commonly
    used door-jam mechanism.

    The Access Cab's 60/40 rear split-bench seat
    provides seating for three passengers, dual
    adjustable outboard headrests and a fold-down
    center armrest with cup holders. Valuables can be
    hidden out of sight in a storage compartment under
    the rear seat cushion or the cushion can be folded
    up to handle cargo, instead of passengers. On
    models equipped with a standard front bench seat,
    the Access Cab will accommodate six passengers --
    three in the front and three in the rear.

    Standard equipment on Tundra will include driver-
    and passenger-side airbags (with passenger air bag
    cutoff switch), all-new sound systems, dual 12-volt
    power outlets, high solar energy-absorbing glass
    and driver- and passenger-side dual sun visors with
    pull-out extensions.

    In anticipation of Tundra's summer launch, Toyota
    has announced prices on the new full-size entry.
    Manufacturers Suggested Retail Prices (MSRP) will
    range from $14,995 for a base 4x2 model to $27,830
    for a top-of-the-line Limited 4x4.

    The company said an SR5 4x2 Access Cab powered by
    the high-tech i-Force V8 will be priced at $22,250.
    The price includes 4-speed ECT automatic
    transmission, CFC-free air conditioning, ETR radio
    with cassette and four speakers, tachometer, cruise
    control and 16-inch styled steel wheels.

    A base-model 4x2 regular cab V6 with five-speed
    manual transmission will have a price of $14,995.
    The price includes cloth seats, cut-pile carpeting,
    AM/FM cassette, dual outside mirrors and P245/70
    R16 tires. SOURCE Toyota Motor Sales USA, Inc.
  • jimtjimt Member Posts: 56
    Chevy also boasts 4wheel antilock disc brakes. Tundra from my reading keeps drums at rear. Also, Chevy LS1 engine may not be overhead cam, but 4.8 litre produces 255HP and a flat torque curve. Fuel economy is also impressive with 21 highway rating on extended cab with 4.8 and auto. Now if Chevy will duplicate Toyota reliabillity they will really have something.
  • Toyota17Toyota17 Member Posts: 15
    Earlier this year, AMCI, an internationally recognized automotive testing and evaluation firm, conducted a series of independent performance evaluations on all the top full-size pickups, including the new Toyota Tundra. And while some "domestic" truck fans might do a double take, we weren't surprised by the findings at all. In many of the most significant categories, Tundra models handily outperformed the competition. The Tundra accelerated, braked, and towed more than Chevrolet, Dodge, or Ford! (Go to http://www.toyota.com/vehicles/future/tundra/acceleration.html for more information.)
  • alt10kalt10k Member Posts: 1
    I saw the Tundra at an auto show recently and it is not going to do much damage to Ford, GM or Chrysler. Note that I did NOT say Toyota won't sell a lot of them.

    The truck is just too small. It is almost exactly the same size as the mid-sized Dodge Dakota. The backseat in the extended cab is a joke, and the bed on the extended cab is only 6 feet long.

    The truck will be a hit with current Tacoma owners who can't wedge their middle-aged spread into their current seats. People who don't really need a full-size truck, but who wouldn't think of driving a Dakota will go gaga.

    Maybe in a few years Toyota will find a way to build a real full size truck and leave the mid-size market to Dodge.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    If this is how you measure the best truck, you are only as good as your last race. Welcome Ford Lightning!
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Bingo, if you are going to compare 0-60 ratings bring on the Ford Lightning baby! Or the Chevy SS, or the Dodge Sport?
    The Tundra still does not offer the packages that Ford/GM/Dodge can offer in their full size trucks. How many engines are there between the three? How many cabs? How many suspensions? How many transmissions? The Tundra will be a " I wanna play with the big boys truck".
  • zx2fanzx2fan Member Posts: 5
    That "Tundra vs. the world" showdown was a little biased. I noticed it was the Toyota's biggest engine (their 4.7 V8) against the medium sized (read: small V8s) of Ford, Chevy and Dodge. Let's turn the table and bring out the Big Three's biggest available light-duty engines, such as the 5.4 Ford, 5.3 Chevy and the 5.9 Dodge. Now it's apples to apples since it's the biggest available engine vs. the biggest available engine.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Seats on the Tundra look thin...
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    Checked out the tundra up close at a dealer today. I got the same impression I got at the auto show. This was a four door, cloth interior, V8, and the salesman said that pricing was a little sketchy yet but he is to understand that the unit he showed was to go for $28,000. What a joke. Small bed, austre dash and controls, and the most uncomfortable rear seat out there. That seat back is almost perfectly vertical. Good luck toyota.
  • garthrgarthr Member Posts: 11
    I just saw the Tundra yesterday,my first impression was,hey this is T100 stretched a little,with a V8.It had the same Toyota low,shallow seats,the same shallow and short bed,the same width as the T100,and the same goofy pricing(as in packages) compared to Ford,GM,or Dodge. I'm sure it's a nice truck,albeit overpriced,but the big 3 have nothing to lose sleep about.The argument that Toyota builds such good vehicles to justify this cost is a joke,on us the consumers.I found foreign makers really gouge you when you need parts down the road,no matter if it is built in the US or not.All the hype about this truck has deflated for me,and apparently some others preceding this message too. I'm sure glad I own a F150.
  • garthrgarthr Member Posts: 11
    Oh,I forgot to mention,the 4.7 V8 takes PREMIUM fuel.......premium fuel for a pickup? That 20+ cents extra per gallon adds up real fast,unless money is no object of course.
  • Toyota17Toyota17 Member Posts: 15
    Well in this chat all I hear is how bad this truck is so I did a test, I tested the Chevrolet Silverado 4.8L V8, Dodge Ram 5.2L V8, Ford F150 4.6L V8, and the Toyota Tundra 4.7L V8 (Note: all were 4x2, believe me also all were equal. To start out here are some stats, Toyota's engine out-horsed all the engines, except the Silverado's which has 10 more horses, but the Silverado's engine is bigger. When I was on the test drive I notice the Tundra was by far the quietest, in the video I got it said special detail went into making the Tundra the quietest pickup. The Tundra also had the best accelerations, with and without a load; and it had the best braking. Another thing is that the Tundra is in it's first year, if it is a big hit there will be more models. The last one is it with have the Lexus LX470's V8 engine, so you know the Tundra is going to be reliable. If there are some positives there are always negatives. The biggest negative I found is it's SIZE this can be a good thing or a bad thing, good if you need to park in a small spot or get into tight areas, bad if you need to carry a lot of people. The front seats have a lot of room, but the rear are another story, my 5'8" son fights perfect, but any bigger no way.

    Here is a short text I saw on the Tundra's state-of-the-Art engine "Finally, a full-size truck that can get out of its own way. We recommend that the competition get out of its way, too- from 0-60, the Tundra V8 4x2 is the fastest in it's class.* Its available 4.7L, 245hp i-Force engine is the only double overhead cam (DOHC), 32-valve V8 offered in a full-size pickup. The unique shape of its pentroof combustion chamber produces maximum fuel efficiency and increased power. There's no lag time with this powerplant- when you get on it, you're gone. What's more, the i-Force V8's advanced design helped the Tundra become one of the first full-size pickups to achieve low emission vehicle (LEV) status."

    So to conclude I think the Tundra will be a great personal use vehicle, that really can haul something, with a maximum towing capability of 3.5 tons. This truck I believe will sell it's goal of 100,000 a year without a problem

    *- Based on AMCI-certified performance tests conducted using a model-year 2000 Toyota Tundra V8 4x2 Access Cab SR5 against comparably equipped 1999 4x2 4.6-liter Ford F-150, 4x2 4.8-liter Chevrolet Silverado and 4x2 5.2-liter Dodge Ram half-ton full-size pickup trucks.
  • rcnrcn Member Posts: 21
    Hey garthr:
    That's an interesting point - that the 4.7 takes premium fuel. But, where did you find that info?
    I've read a few articles on the Tundra and haven't come across that. Does the same 4.7 in the LandCruiser/Lexus 470 take premium?
  • garthrgarthr Member Posts: 11
    rcn: I ran across the Consumer Reports '99 Auto issue.They list some specs for new cars,trucks & suv's.Among that info,they show what engines are available and what type of fuel required.The 4.7l v8 is the same Land Cruiser/Lexus 4.7v8,also requiring premium.I also noticed that the 75" width is the SAME as the T100.I guess they did just stretch it out,as it appears.Their info has always been accurate.From that issue,it's interesting to note it's usually the performance and high end cars/suv's that take premium.Maybe that hints to Toyota's market,being they are kind of pricey.Hey,if I wasn't so tall,could stand their cheap seats,and had alot more money,I'd probably consider one,but I REALLY like my F150!
  • xl_1228xl_1228 Member Posts: 29
    Hey Toyota, why don't you compare the 4.7L Tundra to a 5.4L Ford, 5.3L Chevy, or 5.9L Dodge? Your conclusion about power would have been different.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    And then put on some disc brakes instead of those drum-rears to slow it down again.
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    In response to garthr (post #129 & #132) and rcn (post #131):

    I just test drove a new 2000 Tundra and checked out the owners manual in the truck. It lists a minimum required pump octane rating of 87 (regular unleaded), just like the Ford and Chevy.
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    quadrunner500:

    The Tundra that I just test drove stopped much much better (quicker stop, less peddle effort, less vibration) than either the Ford or Chevy that I drove (all comparable trucks, brand new 4X4 extended cab pickups). Industry testing done so far tends to back this up.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    arkie6,
    You are in denial. They are D R U M S. Are they even anti-lock in rear? Doubt it.
    Not saying there is anything wrong with your preference for Toyotas, but there is no compelling reason than I can see to switch from big-3 at this time. Industry testing just means 'from the manufacturer'. Wait for the independent tests to come out.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    How can you just claim somting reliable its first year? Is it just because its a Toyota??? give me a break! Toyota is know for blown headgaskets and suspension problems to name two. The Tundra will compete more with the Dodge Dakota. Like I keep saying, GM/Dodge/Ford offer more engines, models, suspensions, drivetrains than the Tundra ever will. The Tundra will lure Tacoma owners who want the impression they can compete with the Big boys on the block.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I would certainly hope that the the lightweight tundra would stop faster. The truck is much lighter, which will also account for it requiring less horsepower to get up to speed.
  • rcnrcn Member Posts: 21
    That's interesting that the owner's manual states that the Tundra can use 87 octane. I pulled the aforementioned Consumer Report's 99 issue and it states the opposite. It shows the Tundra/Landcruiser/Lexus 470 all using premium for the 4.7litre engine.
    Any Landcruiser drivers out there with the 4.7 who can shed some light on this?
  • bfowlerbfowler Member Posts: 1
    Thanks for inputs - I have the problem of being 6'9" and a svelte 300#. Sat in a Tundra and I fit but wondered about the life of the seat with my bulk? Anyone have anything on this?
  • rgilergile Member Posts: 3
    After eighteen years of driving imports, I finally
    broke down and ordered a F150.

    I was looking at the Toyota Tundra, but didn't
    like Toyota's attitude with regards to discounting
    off the sticker or building to a customer's wishes.

    So....on April 29 I ordered an F150 in Harvest
    Gold Metallic with a Wedgewood blue lower with the
    4.6 V8, automatic transmission, cloth captain's
    chairs, premium sound with CD, P255 LT tires with
    aluminum alloty wheels, keyless entry, sliding rear window, AC, cruise, power door locks, windows, mirrors, so on and so forth.

    As soon as it arrives, it's getting a Leonard 1200 series fibergalss cover to match the body and Line-X will be applied to the bed up to the rails.

    I really want to thank you all for your comments.
    By reading your comments, I felt I made the right
    decision.
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    rgile had the money tell you what he did, he went downtown and bought a FORD truck! Ford country! Sounds nice.
  • asdf1asdf1 Member Posts: 4
    Another overlook from Toyota, no limited-slip??
    How many more they did not put in to cut a few
    ponds so that the accelaration can look good?
    What a joke.
  • rcnrcn Member Posts: 21
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but some of the V8 models come with a locking rear axle. This is from Edmunds' info. I noticed it on the specs for the various configurations. It is referred to as lock-up. I assume this is the same as a locking rear axle. I was surprised it was available on 2WD models. Yeah, I know that limited slip is different, but it kind of meets the same purpose.
  • coffeycoffey Member Posts: 7
    I think the lock up is for the automatic transmission not for the rear end.
  • rcnrcn Member Posts: 21
    What is a lock-up automatic transmission?
  • xl_1228xl_1228 Member Posts: 29
    rcn,

    A lock up automatic transmission has a clutch which locks the torque convertor into 100% direct drive during light acceleration and cruising, which completely eliminates slippage. The reason for this is to provide better mileage, since RPMs will be lower.
  • gary11gary11 Member Posts: 2
    Like the rest of you I too took a look at the Tundra and thought it was priced to high. Presently I drive a 1990 B2600 Mazda that I bought new. I use a truck for light hauling and commuting. I really don't need a full size pickup but I would consider the Tundra if the price gets realistic. Toyota is going to have a problem selling this vehicle as a full size pickup.
  • bigbeebigbee Member Posts: 2
    I think the tundra will have a hard time competing with the big three. It appeards to bee just a T100 with 4 doors. The cab is too small, and is too highy priced
  • sail235sail235 Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone seen a Regular cab Tundra yet? Here in the Denver area Access Cab V8 4x4 and 2x4s are all all they have. They are all loaded up with little discount on the MSRP.
  • offroadboboffroadbob Member Posts: 7
    Toyotas are known for having nearly bulletproof reliability, and will likely have no trouble selling Tundras at full MSRP. At this time, Toyota does not seem to be targeting longtime full-size truck owners. Those drivers are extremely loyal to their particular brand, and Toyota knows this. Rather, they are targeting owners of compact trucks who are looking to upgrade, or first time truck buyers whose needs exceed the capabilities of, say, a Tacoma or a Mazda B-Series. These are people who want a sports coupe with a big back porch. These are not necessarily serious truck people. A typical Tundra owner likely has a house and wants to be able to carry home his new back yard landscaping that he just bought at Home Depot in one trip. Or pull his jet ski trailer and haul his camping gear. This is not someone who is going to haul a six-place horse trailer and a four sleeper cab-over camper for a long hunting trip in the mountains.
    I think that Toyota has developed a pickup for the city dweller who does not mind getting dirty for fun.

    Toyota may at some point expand the line to even larger, heavier trucks, or offer more possible configurations. Right now they are concentrating on getting their foot in this lucrative market. The Tundra is no T-100. The Big Three had better take this one seriously.
  • mar3mar3 Member Posts: 1
    "Landcruiser will outlast everything else" What data do you have to back this up? I have been in the used truck market and it's unbelievable the milage you find on domestic trucks and they look and drive like new. I'm talking about 200K plus! Landcruiser may be a good truck, but domestics have proven themselves. BTW -- New Landcruisers are a lot more than $40K.

    And thats crap about GM and profits!! Toyota is out to MAKE MONEY just the same. When it comes to unethical business practice, Japanese companies lead the way with price-dumping and other creative schemes to drive out the competition.

    Toyota fans are always championing quality and reliability. They may have a point when compared to some domestic make cars, but I own a Ford truck and these are execellent vehicles. Ford has earned it's top market share and I woulden't trade my F150 for anything. Super Truck!
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Bulletproof reliability? I guess, so long as YOUR head gasket doesn't blow while you are out deep in the woods.

    Or are they only referring to the Camry?
  • 1greg1greg Member Posts: 40
    I wouldn't get to uppity about Chevy quality, there are enough Chevy problems with the 1999's already posted throughout the different conferences. I believe you have posted a few of your own. Chevy STILL needs to get better on quality control and is STILL a notch or two below Toyota.

    Greg Hoppes
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Well sure, Greg. I've had mine now for 4.5 months, and nearly 9000 miles. Certainly isn't new. Lots is known about it. I've posted it here. It's had a few problems along the way. But no reliability issues, because it has been, and remains 100% reliable to date.

    And you are right. Much has been written about quality issues in the different conferences. There is a large body of knowledge and opinion on Silverados. Yes, Chevy still needs to get better on quality control. And Chevy is still a notch or two below Toyota in your mind, at least.

    But at this point, there are no quality/reliability issues concerning the Tundra because there are so few owners to share knowledge with. Give it some time. You can be one of the first, as I'm sure this banter is securing your order for Toyota.

    But remember this, when a Toyota actually delivers tangible benefits, not perceived ones over the domestic brands, they will achieve the market share they deserve, just as they did in the '70s for producing fuel efficient cars when American drivers needed them.
  • 1greg1greg Member Posts: 40
    You know what they say about assuming anything, I still haven't decided whther I would get a GMC or a Tundra, both have things I like and dislike. I also never purchase a vehicle in its first year of production. I like to see what shakes out after they are on the road. Unless GM actually puts a 4th door in the XCAB, I doubt I would ever purchase one from them. Now let me ask you this question, do you think in the Tundra commercial that the guys in the Tundra are actually crawling out of the truck or were they just standing there? I still don't think you could get two adult males in the backseat of a Tundra. Of course if the Tundra had the same back seat it probably would be a tight fit in my garage also.

    Greg Hoppes
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.