Lookout Ford, Dodge, Chevy: Here comes T150

1456810

Comments

  • RoclesRocles Member Posts: 982
    This is going to sound strange to me but I may have to defend Toy a little bit here. Let's face it, I didn't expect, and nor should anyone, that any first model would have as many options as the big 3. The truck market is built around options and I'm sure Toy will soon follow.
    Hell, I was sure they weren't even going to offer an eight.
  • pomy11pomy11 Member Posts: 23
    To All, Consumer reports just out, end all this BS on this posting, Tundra rated Excelllent, and recommended, the other big three are less than the Tundra. All right!!!
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    Go read the consumer reports topic - you think that garbage publication supports your decision - good for you.

    Convincing the other 99% of the world that CR is a good reason to buy Tundra is about as big a dream as thinking Tundra can compete with the big 3.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    Consumer Reports opinions on vehicles mean nothing. They have a long standing love affair with the japanese automakers. Twenty years ago when the US automakers were making garbage, this was justified. In some other areas such as the high end luxury cars the US automakers have apparently opted to not compete. If it has a Honda or Toyota nameplate, consumer reports loves it. Honda and Toyota make some good products and some junk. The toyota tercel is an example of poor engineering, irrepairable piece of junk.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    So does this mean the Tacoma is better than the Ranger? Afterall, CR rated the Ranger higher than the Tacoma.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    that even CR can't ignore - it has a nasty habit of killing anyone inside it if it gets T-boned. Even CR can't ignore a 1 star safety rating for side impact.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    Consumer Reports is a magazine written by people. All people have some bias or opinion. If you know that up front then you can get something from thier articles. Even the "data" that consumer reports publishes must be taken withn a grain of salt. The 1500 dodge 4X4 shows as the worst grade of average mechanical failure rate and most of the grades were above average for the recent years. If you then compare this with thier composite they estimated a much worse than average reliability rate for the 1999 model. Thier numbers contradict themselves. There is useful information in consumer reports but it sure isn't the car buyer's bible.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    So, if CR reports the fact that dodge trucks have a history of poor reliability and predict more for 1999, it's because they love japenese trucks. Conversely, when they rate the Tacoma poorly in side impact it's because....?
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    CR doesn't rate Tacoma poorly in side impact - federal safety tests do. My point was that when official tests rate Tacoma that poorly CR can't ignore it.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I was the one that brought up the dodge reliability stats. The point was that in the same publication they blatantly disagree with themselves. If the truck scores above average in most all mechanical catagories how do they predict well below average reliability other than some journalists feeling toward dodge.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    Because it is a DODGE!!!!!!!! What the heck do you expect them to "predict"?! It's the only line of vehicles that surpasses(barely) GM products in the "most likely to break" category. You guys can have your long list of options and engine/drivetrain configurations. I'll stick with my "small", reliable Tundra. I'm sure you guys would be spouting off at the mouth if CR picked your trucks as the best available. You know it and I know it!! Give it a rest. You are boring us.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    pyrodex - on the subject of boredom.......

    How many times have we had to put up with the words relaible and Tundra in the same sentence.

    Now I know that I am a brain dead imbecile because I bought a Dodge, but please explain how a company that launched a completely new vehicle in June has proved its reliability.

    Or is it just - its a Toyota, of course its reliable.

    When your trucks have been around for a while then we will see how reliable they are - if you and others find it necessary to tell everyone how reliable their teuck is so often it doesn't say much for it does it - just listen to yourselves - I've got a Tundra, its 4 months old and you wouldn't believe how reliable it is.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    You don't have to put up with anything...all you have to do is leave. If you don't think that Toyota(from the most expensive Lexus on down to the Corolla) has proven its reliability how can I have an intelligent debate with you? The most important part of a vehicle(and most expensive to repair) is the engine and drivetrain. The V8 in the Tundra is essentially the same as the V8 in the Lexus and Landcruiser with a few tweaks. I think you'll find an excellent track record with these engines. I also think you'll find the Tundra has an excellent drivetrain warranty that far exceeds that of the domestic products. I read some yahoo's remarks that Toyota offers this warranty because the Tundra needs it. That statement is beyond stupid! Anyone with common sense knows that a manufacturer is in the business to make money, not throw it away. Offering an extended warranty because it is expected to be needed is throwing money away. Surely you can even understand this.

    Oh well, why am I even bothering to respond to you? You are the one with the Dodge! That's your problem, not mine. Enjoy it while it lasts. As for Tundra people mentioning reliability often. I believe it is done in the Tundra topics. It is not done on the Dodge or Chevy boards. I guess you haven't picked up on that yet because you LIVE in the Tundra topics. If you are tired of the Tundra....go to another topic. There are plenty to choose from that have absolutely nothing to do with the Tundra. Until then, get used to the Toyota's reliabilty. I know I have. It is wonderful. Maybe you can move up to a Tundra for you next vehicle instead of dreaming about that GM! LOL!!!!!!!!!!
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    You dig your holes far better than I ever could.

    Let me ask you a question. If Toyota's drivetrain is so damn wonderful why did you let them rip you off with the cost of an extended warranty - the cost was part of the price of your truck - to use you words - surely you can even understand this.

    The truck has a good engine, show me one place that I have denied this - though yes I would laugh if one of those "tweaks" went wrong, just to see your reaction.

    Enjoying my Dodge, yes thank you I am. My truck is wonderful, couldn't be happier. As for not visiting and posting in other topics, well I think you have just told us a lot about you. Those people who, obviously unlike you, visit a wide range of topics here will recognise my name from any number of topics that have absolutely nothing to do with toy trucks.

    If you don't believe me I can give you a list where my posts can be found, but its a long list and I don't want to bore all those other 'invaders' in this topic who don't realise that any topic that is vaguely related to Tundra is the exclusive property of owners of the wannabe truck.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    I paid $675 over invoice for my truck. If you call that paying extra then I'm guilty.

    I do frequent several topics. I just choose to let people enjoy the trucks they own and not spew moronic hatred towards Dodge in a Dodge topic or towards Chevy in a Chevy topic. The key is keeping my thoughts on the Tundra and other vehicles confined to the Tundra boards. I would never go to the Dodge board to berate the Dodge. However, I won't hesitate to do it here or in a "Tundra only" topic where "jerkish" Dodge or Chevy owners spew lies and garbage. I have owned those brands and they are only problems waiting to happen. That is my opinion...based on fact. I owned these vehicles in my younger days...fortunately, I grew out of it. Maybe you will, too.

    As far as thinking this topic is exclusive to the Tundra, I don't think this one is. However, you don't confine your comments to this topic. You can be found in ALL Tundra topics. I think it is childish of you to do this. What purpose does it serve?

    I have noticed that you tend to argue with lots of folks. This tells me alot about you! I just can't say it here. Don't want to violate any rules.

    Remember, no matter what your response is, I win. See, you will still own the Dodge and I'll still own the Toyota. Give it up.
  • andy_jordanandy_jordan Member Posts: 764
    You don't get it do you - if you don't need a drivetrain warranty but paid for it anyway you got ripped off. You would have got ripped off at invoice, because the cost of the warranty was included in the invoice cost - again surely even you can see this.

    You are right I do visit some Tundra topics, not all, and I don't see that as the crime you do. Posted to one of them yesterday, and got the thanks of one of your less bigoted fellow Tundra owners for doing so.

    If you look at some of the strings that I am involved in you will see I don't "spew lies", what invariably happens is what is happening here - I get accused (like with the engines bit), I respond perfectly reasonably (like I said - I've never knocked Toyota engines), and then the comeback forgets completely about that point and accuses me of something else entirely - just like your last post.

    Your logic is infallible regarding buying a Toyota - you had problems with the big 3 so you don't buy them, I applaud you. No, I am not being sarcastic, if you have problems then you are less likely to buy again, agreed. I do have a hard time though with the extension of that logic - I had problems with (for instance) Dodge, therefore all Dodge trucks are crap.

    You think that you 'win' (whatever that means), because you drive a Toyota, I am glad. I am happy with my choice and can not imagine a time where I would ever be happy with a Toyota truck. Not because it's a Toyota, because I don't perceive it to meet my needs.

    If it meets your needs that's wonderful - its called choice. You and I will never agree, the difference is I avoid vitriolic statements like 'I win because I drive a Toyota'. This all started because you didn't like mys posts 388 and 390. These posts did not quote opinions, just facts - that the Tacoma is unsafe in side impact collisions. This has been proved by federally approved tests.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    I assure you this all didn't start regarding your most recent posts. I don't give a rat's butt about what you post regarding Tacoma's. It makes absolutely no difference to me.

    I never said your visits to the Tundra sites are crimes. I just have a problem with you bashing Tundras in the Tundra topic. Why do you feel the need to do that? It is childish...period.

    As far as the engine comment goes. You questioned the Tundra's reliability because it's new. I said the biggest repair costs for a vehicle involves engines and trannies. I guess you were referring to the radio buttons when you were referring to the Tundra's reliability.

    If you price Silverados, Rams, F150s, and Sierras, you'll find the prices are pretty much the same. The Tundra has a longer warranty for essentially the same money. I guess this escapes you. I've read alot of your posts and realize your logic doesn't always hold water. You are not always "reasonable" either.

    As for the bigotry remark, that is absurd. I could never be mistaken for a bigot. You better try another name for me. Bigot doesn't fit.

    I'll say it again, I own a Tundra. You own a Dodge. You can't win a truck argument with me. Plain and simple. Keep dreaming of that GMC!
  • teaganteagan Member Posts: 15
    Amen brother! I think andy just has a bad case of buyers remorse, he picked the wrong truck and it's killing him. I think his anger would be better placed at the salesman who put him together on that lump. It maybe just the fact that he is from england and with most of there cars wired by the prince of darkness Lucas anything looks good. After all when has the uk ever produced a sound car that works day in day out like a Toyota. Never! So please forgive my new Canadian counterpart andy and remember ignorance is bliss! and andys having a party.
  • teaganteagan Member Posts: 15
    Drive the Tundra them talk please. You will save us all a lot of typing blisters.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    LOL!!
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    What makes this a Tundra topic? I thought somewhere I read Ford, Dodge, Chevy in the title.

    I guess I too can't have an intelligent debate with you by your measure, since Toyota reliability has been "granted" to the Tundra, not earned. I wonder how many of those reliable Tacomas would still be on the road if the owners themselves had to pay for all those recalled, head gasket repairs. Something must be keeping the service department garage doors open. If it isn't broken cars and trucks, maybe free coffee?

    As for your point about the Tundra engine and drivetrain being the same as the Lexus and Land Cruiser with some tweaks? Last time I drove one, the LS400 was completely different, with variable valve timing, 5 speed auto, different block, bores, etc.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    Andy,
    You say we're missing your point on the Tacoma side impact ratings. I'm trying very hard to understand what your point is! Are you now saying that CR would lie about the Tacoma's safety unless our goverment beauracrats hadn't forced their hand?
  • edgledgl Member Posts: 3
    3 of my co-workers have Tacoma trucks. The trucks are 4 cylinder vehicles. My co-workers like their trucks, but do not like the noisy valve train at idle. I had heard these engines and they sound like a diesel when at idle.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    Reading comprehension must not be your strong suit. It was never stated that THIS topic was Tundra only. It was made VERY clear that this topic was not being considered Tundra only. Try reading the posts again. As for the head gaskets, that's the ONLY thing you domestic guys can ever harp on. Toyota fixed/replaced all of those at NO cost to the consumer(only inconvenience). No matter the mileage on the vehicle & no matter whether they were giving any problems. I'll take that anytime. GM can only dream of such customer service. You can't win this debate either! Later.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Excuuuuu...sssee me for bad reading comprehension.

    But why not harp on the head gasket? I'm really very glad Toyota USA paid for those repairs.

    But since they do, it's very fair to point out it's a very inferior engine design, unattended could leave you stranded in the Mojave within 60,000 miles.

    And you have to wonder the same thing about the Tundra, what with a rubber belt all that's separating your 32 valve head from a very expensive collision with the piston tops. That belt isn't going to last as long as the rest of the engine, unless it breaks.

    But one thing I can assure you, if customer service is the subject, I don't have to dream about it. I think it's fine the Toyota service department is open Saturdays to change your oil and serve you donuts. But the real service heros for Toyota are Federal Express and UPS next day Air, because parts distribution is a hoax compared to the local availability and multiple sources of Motorcraft, Mopar, AC Delco, Dana, Spicer, NAPA, Fed Mogul, etc.
  • teaganteagan Member Posts: 15
    Where ever did you get the idea that the Tundra has a timing belt not a chain? Some of the new Toyotas have belts but not all. For example the new Echo, Corolla, Celica, and so on are all chain driven. The last time I looked the Tundra was a chain. As for the the Tundra not having (VVT.I) like the Lexus look again. What do you think the "I" in I-FORCE stands for? Just a thought. You also mention that Toyota has had A recall, how about the to many to mention recalls of GM, FORD, and CHRYS.. On the point of the Tacoma side crash test. The test was carried out using a two wheel drive Tacoma. Now in case most people don't know this truck sits lower then the average 1/4 ton. Making it not so good in a side impact, I agree. The Tacoma 4x4 on the other hand would have faired much better with its 11.6 in. of ground clearance. What most people who pick on the 2wd Tacomas poor side impact crash forget or don't know is the Tacoma is the best in a frontal offset crash. This according to IIHS.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    You'll not have to worry about your GM breaking down in the middle of Mojave. They generally do it before they get out of town. LOL!!! GM...what a joke! Only thing worse is a Dodge. Right Andy?
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    pyrodex- Real intelligent resonse there #391. Your buddies at consumer reports makes a total statistical blunder and that's your comeback? You've got your head buried pretty deep and you know where.
    This is not a tundra topic so let's not make like it is. The buyers of domestic trucks are in the majority on the road and on the boards. There are reasons for this. The general population is not all ignorant.

    Speaking of this taken for granted toyota reliabilty, lets look at the tercel. If they wanted to have people associate toyota with reliability then they should never have marketed a car that cannot be repaired. The list of repairs on this car (my mothers') far exceeds the cost of the car and several independet mechanics as well as toyota admits that there is nothing that can be done about the carburators on these cars as they cannot be rebuilt and they are faulty by design. They have not made available any replacement. I guess just not as many people have this problem as the famous head gasket and a little bad press they can just put off as insignificant low end customers.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I only have 25,000 miles on my dodge so far. Me and my truck have a long way to go but so far it hasn't missed a beat. No problems at all. Your tundra I'm sure will be running strong at 25,000 miles as well as should any truck. At 25,000 miles thuogh on a toyota truck I'd be on the lookout for body panels rusting off. I had a toyota, I know.
  • rwellbaum2rwellbaum2 Member Posts: 1,006
    I see your buddy rublue/trucks4me is back and posting on the chevy frame failure site. (I'm still allowed to at least read it, right?). Anyway, why would a belt be so horrible? I've owned cars with belt drive and never had a problem. If you change the belt at the recommended interval it's better than a chain in several respects. Lower mass, doesn't elongate as it wears, isolates the two sprockets from interharmonics. Average belt cost @ $20. I do all my own maintenance because I like to and really don't trust a mechanic I don't personally know. So, the only reason you would end up stranded is if you neglected to properly maintain your truck (i.e. drove it many thousands of miles past the recommended replacement mileage)
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    I have no buddies at CR. I have not read the magazine in years. I don't buy vehicles based on magazine articles...either pro or con. Neither should you(even if there were some touting the Dodge!!!).

    You must have been studying reading comprehension with Quadrunner(or is that RUBLUETOO? I always wondered.). I never said or indicated that THIS topic is a Tundra only topic. READ AGAIN!!!!!!

    Thanks for the input on the Tercel. I won't be buying one now. I was so close, too! You are right. Nobody would ever associate Toyota with reliabilty. Dodge always comes to mind!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!
  • teaganteagan Member Posts: 15
    Where to start. First of all the Tercel ( a great car I might add) only had a problem with the 1988-89 cars. At my dealership, Tercels only had to come in once and the small problem was resolved. You mention only two Toyota headaches and minor at that. All the cars were fixed and most are still on the road today. Now lets look at some of GM's,FORD's,CHRYS, headaches; GM remember the Vega, Corvair, mid 80's caddies . FORD how about the pinto, mid 70's mustang, edsel, late
    70' T birds. Chrys. there whole line-up from 74 to 89 sucked. These are just a few of there problems I don't have the time to list them all. As for the rust problem with Toyota in the 80's Toyota like ALL OTHER MAKES used recycled metal to cut costs, hence the rust. In 1992 Toyota went to all new steel construction and pvc sealer over every weld and seam unlike gm, ford and chrys.. They still use junk metal and have no sealer around any of there welds or seams. Toyota also uses stainless steel exhaust, a built in safety cage in the roof and DOHC on all it's cars and truck's unlike the U.S three. Oh! Remember the Tundra is built in the states unlike the U.S auto makers trucks. They build most of there trucks in Canada and Mexico. So Americans give yourself a hand you build on heck of a quality truck, the Tundra that is. Thank you from every Canadian who owns one of these fine trucks.
  • arkie6arkie6 Member Posts: 198
    Reply to teagan,

    I'm pretty sure the Tundra V8 does use a belt to drive the cam shafts. This is a good thing in my opinion, if they are properly maintained. In another post, I remember that someone checked their recommended timing belt replacement interval, and they stated that the manual recommended replacement every 90,000 miles.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    pyrodex- I have no intention of backtracking 413 posts to list the number of times that you and teagan have wined that this is a tundra topic and owners of domestic trucks are picking on you. Run home to mommy now. She'll make it all better.

    teagan- There isn't a fix on the tercel carbs according to SEVERAL chicago area dealers. Replacement is the only option knowing full well that the part WILL fail again. I know that you are not interested in tercels. It was merely an example that toyota doesn't always make quality, reliable cars. Nor do they always make right by the customer.

    Why are you bringing up cars from the '70s and '80s? Why are you talking about cars at all. My point on the tercel was only to make a point about toyota in general and I will freely admit that every one of the carmakers have produced bad cars. It seems that the toyota owners seem to have a problem admitting ANY shortcomings.

    Now go climb in the back seat of your tundra and explain this again and give all a good laugh.
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    To save you some time without having to go back 413 posts, I have NEVER said THIS was a Tundra only topic.

    YOU brought up the car, not me.

    And while I'm home with mommy this Thanksgiving, I'll be giving thanks that you bought a Dodge instead of me.

    Here's a silver lining for you: As each day passes, you're closer to your next vehicle!! Next time, maybe you'll use some common sense and buy a Toyota, or a Chevy, or a Ford. Anything other than a Dodge. LOL!!!!!!!!!
  • johnrr1johnrr1 Member Posts: 70
    my sides are hurting from laughing so hard , are you to brothers or the same person ? you must both come from the same inbred lineage . your beloved tundra is riding on the coat tails of other toyotas , till there are 1 million of them on the road and they have been on the market for more than 9 months you have no reliability track record period , my dodge has 45k miles on it in 18 months and other than my a/c compressor expiring early i have had no reliability problems , starts everyday , i have towed to capacity over long grades and it hasn't missed a beat , you both talk out of both sides of your mouth , you say that this is not a tundra only topic but yet anytime anyone comes up with a fact , all you both do is belittle them , that i feel is the sign on a very swallow and low self esteemed person , which you both seem to fall into , face it the toyota is not the only truck on the market and its not for everyone , the fact that you don't agree with this proves how uneducated and narrow minded one can be
  • johnrr1johnrr1 Member Posts: 70
    rwellbaum i am neither depressed or frustrated that i own a dodge , i could only be frustrated if i owned a toyota and then realized that for a few dollars more i could have bought a real truck
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    to pay a few dollars more for a Dodge. Does rebate mean anything to you?

    18 months(at best) is pretty good for a compressor. You should be proud!
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    You guys are very defensive about decision to buy your undersized toyota. Feeling a little insecure are we.

    I too will be thankful this thanksgiving that I drive a doge instead of a toyota.

    There have been a number of earlier posts that have been made that stated that this is a tundra topic. They did not say tundra only, but it sure was implied.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    It was teagan's post that mentioned cadilacs,pintos,vegas, t-birds,mustangs, and edsels. Where this collection of cars came from, I don't know. Nor do I see any relation to this topic. Every manufacturer makes some bad cars and trucks and some good- That is except the GOD of all cars TOYOTA.

    The toyota trucks of the 70s and 80s were well known for rusting out far faster than thier competion whether it be foregn or domestic. The toyota truck that I owned was purchased two years old and it had rust on it. By the time I sopld it I was thankful the body stayed on while the new owner drove away.
  • jcmdiejcmdie Member Posts: 594
    I wonder why the engineering wizards at toyota didn't call the tundra the T101. That is what would follow the T100. I believe that they said that was full size also. I think that they said the domestics had something to worry about when that wonder truck came out. It did it all, yup.

    I've said it before on this topic and on others that the tundra isn't a bad truck just mis-classed. There is nothing wrong with that unless you paid for a full sized truck.
  • johnrr1johnrr1 Member Posts: 70
    whats with all this rebate b.s. ??? i am definitely missing something here . when i bought my 98 QUADCAB there was no rebate on the quads , now i'm getting the truck i should have bought first , the 2500 with the cummins , its a new 2000 model , still no rebate , i thought rebates were only for vehciles that don't sell well , read tundras in canada , from what i read on here somewhere they are giving them away , heck i should go north , buy one real cheap and then bring it down here , towed behind my present dodge of course and trade it in for a profit on my new dodge , wait that won't happen , my friendly dodge dealer won't want anything to do with the tundra , well i guess they could use it to haul trash to the dumpster out back ...
  • johnrr1johnrr1 Member Posts: 70
    i didn't mention any one brand in particular , any of the 1/2 ton offerings from the big 3 , toyota not being one of them, is a real truck ... the tundra is still a toy , its right there on the tailgate in the name TOYota
  • mviglianco1mviglianco1 Member Posts: 283
    After clicking on your name I really wonder why the most important aspect about yourself is that you would never buy a Toyota. Who cares? After reading through many discussion groups I have found that as you go down the quality ladder of domestic trucks you get more fanatical angry owners. You would be hard pressed to find a Toyota owner who places so much of there identity into what truck they drive. Ford owners are pretty level headed also but when you get to Chevy and then Dodge people start getting mean spirited and hateful. Dont take what I say too seriously and what I say isn't aimed only at you. I know my "rusted out" "Toy" that already has 115,00 miles will be on the Road longer then your new truck and anyone who isn't so fanatical about there brand of vehicle knows that. Lighten up a little
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    You got me. I'm trading today. Gotta get me a Dodge!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!

    Two Dodge truck in two years....you da man!!!!
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    trucks
  • pyrodexpyrodex Member Posts: 47
    Quality, quality, quality...refinement, refinement, refinement. There is no substitute!
    Until you have experienced it, you don't know what you're missing. You will learn sooner or later.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    Teagan,
    The Tundra engine does not have the variable valve timing. And since you erroneously reported that the overhead cams are driven by chains, not belts, I have to ask myself why I even bother.

    Rwellbaum2,
    Why don't you call your dealer, and get a quote, parts and labor, to replace the camshaft drive belt, and post the result here. I dare 'ya.
  • tp4unctp4unc Member Posts: 437
    I hate to jump in here but you know an under the hood light is needed much more often on a GM. It is not necessary on a Tundra! Sorry, I couldn't resist.
  • quadrunner500quadrunner500 Member Posts: 2,721
    But I found out the meaning.

    I Force = "I" wish it wasn't a Toyota!
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.