Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

BMW 3-Series Run Flat Tires

1161719212262

Comments

  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Sorry, my bad. BMW has changed how the buttons work since I picked up my last car. :blush:

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    I'm surprised that the handling of the E92 is so different to that of the E90. Could the added weight of the diesel affect the overall handling balance significantly?

    I'm still in favor of the RFTs -- I like the staggered RE050A 17" setup on the sport suspension US Market 325/328 and feel the car is set up correctly for those tires.

    I agree that the springs stiffen in colder weather -- but this has been true of all cars I've owned.

    By the way, how do you think the torquey diesel compares to the top end urgency of the non-turbo 6-cyl petrol engines? Does it suit the character of the car -- add or detract?
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    np -- appreciate your New England expertise on this.

    Regards, NK
  • highlandpetehighlandpete Member Posts: 46
    My car, E91 330d touring (UK) has the same engine, so front weight will be very similar.

    The cold weather 'stiffening' appears much more severe than anything I've come across in over 35-years of motoring. Add the stiffness of the RFT's when cold, and we have very fine tolereances before it is so noticeable. Even on a single trip I can notice the difference as the ambient temperature changes. (Can be up to 10-degrees Centigrade in a day, here in the Highlands). Plus if we drive into cold rain the cooling effect on the tyres, means the dynamics fall apart very quickly.

    The 3-litre diesel, along with the 6-speed auto is a brilliant combination. Suits the lower revs and the torque the engine gives. I came from an E39 540i V8, the diesel has a greater urgency for overtaking, more instant in the punch it gives. But is so different and not addictive like a petrol motor at full chat. It is a car driven by the 'head' not really the 'heart'.

    Highland Pete
  • steves29650steves29650 Member Posts: 1
    I concur that some customers were not treated fairly. My wife has a 2006 BMW330i with Bridgestone Turenza RFTs on it. She has just over 12,000 miles on it. Two weeks ago today, she took it in complaining of noisey ride and the fact that the tire pressure indicator had illuminated. She was told that the sidewall on the right front had a crack in it and that it needed replaced. Two and a half days and $375 later, she picked it up. Still noisey!! Last Friday, the tire pressure indicator came back on. Another trip to the BMW dealer indicated that another sidewall had a crack and needed replaced. I instructed her to have the dealership fill it with enough air to get her to a Bridgestone dealer. Bridgestone ended up replacing all four tires, noting the unusual wear described in BMW Service Bulletin SI B 36 06 06. She is now fitted with Bridgestone Potenze RE050A RFTs at less than half the cost per tire that the BMW dealership was going to charge. When I called to talk to Service Manager on Saturday, he finally mentioned the Service Bulletin but would not refund the cost of the new Turenza with <200 miles on it. This is our fifth BMW and first from this dealership. Do not anticipate buying anymore from this dealership (Greenville, SC).
  • eaglefan94eaglefan94 Member Posts: 2
    I drive a 325i 2006 and I am done with Turanza and probably Bridgestone all together. Any recommendations on RFTS? I have been looking at Michelin Pilot Exalto and am also reading good things about Yokohama YK520. :mad:
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I have the Continental Contipro Contact SSR and so far, very happy with them. 4,500K

    Regards,
    OW
  • eaglefan94eaglefan94 Member Posts: 2
    Thank you
  • sushi2sushi2 Member Posts: 1
    I have 2 BMW, a 2003 330 Cabriolet and a 2006 330 xi.
    The Cabriolet tires aren't run flat and they are great. The 330 xi has Bridgestone run flat tires and it's a DISASTER. The BMW engineers are supposed to be great but in this case here they clearly made the wrong decision. By selecting run flat tires they turned a great car into a very bad one. There are absolutely no upside with those tires but only a long list of downsides. I cannot believe BMW did this. It is the last time I buy a BMW...my lease still has 2 years to go and I am counting the days...
  • robl1robl1 Member Posts: 25
    My wife's 2005 325xi still has the original Goodyear stock tires on the front. The rears were only changed 3 months ago when a sidewall got damaged. Bought 1 new tire and exchanged the other with the spare. I'll put on new front tires in a few months but obviously I feel much better not dealing with RFTs. I can deal with having a small trunk. Thats why rather than looking for a new BMW now for myself I'm searching for used.
  • rhmassrhmass Member Posts: 263
    Since I have currently owned two BMWs including a '06 330i, I thought I probably be able to address your seeming frustration in your posting. I share your dissatisfaction with the Bridgestone RFT that come with the '06 as original equipment tires. After over 9,000 miles of serious handling issues on these tires, I complained to the BMW North America. These tires were replaced recently with Continental RFTs and I can tell you the new continental tire have made a world of difference. The car now handles just like all my previous BMWs. I think BMW has recognized the mistake in putting the first generation of RFTs made by Bridgestone. The subsequent replacement tires have corrected the problem. There is always risk in being one of the first. As long as BMW can recognize its mistake and take corrective measures, I have no problem with the co. I have been a happy customer and will continue to be one.
    Change your tires to Continentals and you should be able to realize its positive effect on handling.
  • keanhookeanhoo Member Posts: 3
    My 1st complaint to my service adviser at ~15k miles (Oct 06), they ignored about it.

    2nd complaint at ~17k (Dec 06), service adviser ignored about it again. I was helpless.

    In March 07 (~19k) I saw the bulletin post, and finally got the replacement today. I took the 50% share cost, as I got 19k on my 325i 205/55/16. From Bridgestone EL42 to Conti's, total cost $310 + tax. (I think they still overcharge me...I call their Part dept, it's $139 each, it should be total of $278, I don't know where the extra $32 came from :confuse: )

    Overall result? The ride is smoother, quieter (much...much...), and it's not that bumpy too. Oh, got a 328i coupe loaner, it's fun~
  • kjenkins696kjenkins696 Member Posts: 27
    I'm seriously considering a factory ordered 328xi wagon, but really concerned about the tires. I'm sure the salesman flat out lied to me about it the other day when he said he's never even heard of anyone complaining about the run flats.

    In any case, I'm wondering if I can request/demand the Continentals instead of the Bridgestones?

    Also, can anyone speak about their experience with the '07 Bridgestones as opposed to the problematic '06's? Have they really gotten any better?
  • bemerbemer Member Posts: 20
    I tried to request Continental. It did not work. According to the dealer, BMW installs whichever brand they have on stock at the time when car is build. Most of the time &#150; Bridgestones. After July of 2006 they have a new compound.
    This is what I&#146;ve got. Less than 1000 miles and still good.
  • rflrfl Member Posts: 100
    BMW will absolutely accept an order for 3 series that states "ship with Conti Pro Contact SSR tires or customer WILL NOT ACCEPT DELIVERY!". Let 'em stick someone who has not done his research with the Bridgestones! I saw two identical cars at a dealer's yesterday (new 328i convertibles) side by side...one had Bridgestones and one had the Contis.The new Bridgestones are NO BETTER than the old ones...drive them both and you decide. My advice: INSIST ON THE CONTIS OR DON'T BUY THE CAR.
  • kjenkins696kjenkins696 Member Posts: 27
    Yes, I saw exactly the same thing at my local dealer the other day. Nearly identical 3 series wagons side by side - only one had the Contis and the other had the Bridgestones.

    When I order, I'll insist on the Contis. . .
  • eshields10eshields10 Member Posts: 2
    flat tires...hahaha ive had 3 in the last year each a different tire everytime pain the the butt
  • bemerbemer Member Posts: 20
    Does anyone have any experience with struts brace (crossbar) &#150; part# 51 71 0 406 937?
    BMW has one for $300.00. Any other benefits than improving handling on the turns?
    As we all know, current suspension and RFT tires are pretty harsh on the car.
    Would this thing help to preserve structural rigidity of the car longer, in comparison to the cars, which don&#146;t have one installed?
    As we all know, current suspension and RFT tires are pretty harsh on the car.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Where do you get the idea that the suspension or tires is "hard on the car"? Sounds like supposition to me.

    Strut towers/braces tend to improve handling but usually make the car ride a bit rougher.
  • highlandpetehighlandpete Member Posts: 46
    I totally agree on RFT's being hard on the suspension and the car. My car became full of rattles induced by the 'extra' work the body has to absorb.

    I've had new roll bar bushes at 10,000-miles due to the noise from them. They were worn out. Also I've just fitted Koni FSD's (dampers/struts) to try and soften the suspension and stop the 'crashing' through the car. This has silenced the suspension and also stopped the creaking over speed humps. Very clear the original struts are wearing fast. They were weeping oil at 9,000 miles.

    There is a lightweight brace already fitted on the E90/1 series cars. A 'full' brace may make it more rigid, but transfer the loadings somewhere else.

    Highland Pete
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    You must have had some hard miles on your car, Pete. My E90 is still rock solid and quiet after 12K miles on the EL42's and another 5K miles on the Conti SSR's.

    I assume you have BS? The Conti's were a huge improvement IMO.

    Regards,
    OW
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    I go back to my RE050As on Tuesday after a winter on LM-22s in the Philly area. One ice storm justified the decision to go with the winter tires, which seemed very capable and a good traction versus handling compromise for a not-too-extreme mid-Atlantic climate. I like the balance of the staggered summer setup though and look forward to having the car's full capabilities back. Need to keep the dealer educated on tire pressures -- they don't seem to be very familiar with the owner's manual.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    nkeen,

    I noticed the dealer/pressure thing when they mounted the conti's on my car. 38 lbs in all 4.

    I just rotated the tires at 5K miles but had a little problem with one lug...stripped it with a 12 point socket. Cheap Craftsman! Now I need to get that fixed. Reckon I should take it to the dealer.

    Regards,
    OW
  • highlandpetehighlandpete Member Posts: 46
    I wouldn't say hard miles, other cars have not given the same problems. My BMW 540i touring on M-tech suspension was fine. No premature wear issues. Replacement rear dampers at about 75,000-miles, which seems pretty typical here in the UK.

    My car was on the first generation Bridgestone Potenza RE 050 A RFT's. I'm currently running Goodyear Eagle F1's. But will be fitting the Bridgestone's again to see if the modified suspension works with them.

    I've had a new driver's door seal as it groaned so much, due to the vibrations and pounding the car was getting. The feeling on RFT's, my car was shaking to bits.

    Highland Pete
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Pete,

    From your feedback, I'm thinking the RE050 was also mad with the BAD RUBBER. What do you think?

    Regards,
    OW
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    Nothing wrong with the RE050As that came with ZSP on my 2006 325i (225/45R17 F and 255/40/R17 R). Much superior to the GFT EL42s on my TL. I haven't driven the car with GFTs, but suspect it would feel soft and a little sloppy with them.
  • highlandpetehighlandpete Member Posts: 46
    RE050's are giving trouble in the UK, then so are most RFT's. Heel and toe wear, noise, awful ride and all the rest of the problems. 'Normal' rubber makes the car feel better controlled and gives so much more feedback which is far more 'typical' of real BMW's. The confidence factor when driving hard is so much better on the normal rubber, progress is faster as you don't back off as you do when you feel the grip is near the limit on the RE 050's.

    Highland Pete
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    I can only go with my subjective appreciation of the tires, and my case, disagreed with many on the board, that that the suspension was engineered for runflats and hence designed to accommodate the added stiffness of the tires with increased compliance elsewhere. But then, I'm no engineer. I find the ride extremely smooth on milled concrete and on the thin asphalt top-coat used here (much finer grain than the hot rolled tar used in the UK), but there's no denying there's some impact harshness where the asphalt overlay has buckled and cracked under the strains of the contraction and expansion of the underlying concrete. Around here there's a fondness for building roads but an aversion to maintaining them properly (throw some loose tar in the hole and let the cars pummel it in, seems to be the general approach) and keeping them free of debris and trash.
  • jgraffmanjgraffman Member Posts: 14
    I replaced the Bridgestone run flats on my '06 325 xi sportwagon at 7700 miles last August. The problem was noise caused by severe cupping. My BMW dealer claimed ignorance of the problem and exhibited no sympathy. Thru this forum I found out about the January '07 service bulletin (SI B 36 06 06). When I called the bulletin to my dealer's attention, a they sent me a check for the tire replacement cost ($1191 for 4 Michelin non RF Pilot Sports). I have 5000 miles on these tires and they seem to be wearing properly. It seems like your dealer should honor this service bulletin and try to keep a customer.

    After I replaced the tires, I also did a lot of complaining to Firestone. The local district manager examined the tires, confirmed they were bad and said I should have rotated them. He also said had I brought the car to Firestone, they would have replaced the tires at no cost.
  • danobairdanobair Member Posts: 1
    I've got an appointment today at the dealer to look at Turanza run flats. I to got hip to the TSB about these dogs of a tire on my "06" 330i. ( 17300 miles ) I'm to sure about getting more EL 42 Turanza back on. ( new compound ? )
    It sounds like the Conti run flat is better. If I decide to go with regular non run flats, does anybody knoe if the wheel a warranty will still be in affect ?
  • tonyajtonyaj Member Posts: 1
    I JUST ORDERED A 2007 328XI AND IM HORRIFIED BY ALL OF THE STORIES WITH THE RF TIRES. CAN YOU USE STANDARD TIRES IN PLACE OF THE FUNFLATS? IM SO SORRY I ORDERED THIS CAR. I HAD A 2003 WHICH WAS FINE BUT LEASE WAS UP AND NOW I ENCOUNTER THIS NIGHTMARE...HELP! :sick:
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Just put on normal tires. I replaced my rfts with real tires. The car's handling, roadfeel, noise, vibration, etc all improved.
  • pearlpearl Member Posts: 336
    this was the story going around a couple of months back, because, reportedly, Bridgestone had been beaten up so much over the noise, cupping, premature wear, etc, of the EL42s, that they were going to change the rubber compound used in the tire. Has anyone heard if this actually happened, and if so, when?
  • lipplipp Member Posts: 58
    Do yourself a favor.............cancel your order. The car is VERY overrated.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I heard July 2006 the rubber compound changed.

    Regards,
    OW
  • jeseesjesees Member Posts: 1
    Run flats lasted about 20K miles. These were noisy and cupped. Car sounded /felt like a truck. New tires are high performance all season . Found out rear suspension was out of specs on the alignment. New tires feel like i am on glass , quiet ! However, ther is no spare or room for one in the truck. Carry a pump and tire repair kit fr emergencies, would like a doughnut tire. I sthere one for BMW 325 xi ??
  • bruceomegabruceomega Member Posts: 250
    For those that have the Continental RFTs, have you noticed an incease in road noise compared to when they were new?

    I switched from the EL-42s to the Continental RFTs on my 06 330Xi about 6 months and 8,000 miles ago. They were a huge improvement over the EL-42s in ride smoothness and quietness. Now, I seem to notice some road noise, more than when I first put on the Continentals, although they are nowhere near as noisy as the EL-42s had become with the same mileage.

    I'm curious what others have experienced.

    Thanks
    Bruce
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Bruce,

    Same car with 6,000 miles. I notice no road noise at all with the Conti SSR's.

    Regards,
    OW
  • adethieradethier Member Posts: 16
    If you haven't had to change tires, haven't had a flat or are planning on a long trip in your BMW with run-flat tires, read this:

    Post on run flat tire experience
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    Didn't strike me as a particularly articulate or well reasoned post. Not sure what the correlation between the need to check tire pressure and the degree of luxury that a car offers is supposed to be. High performance GFTs, while cheaper, are not cheap. 24K from a high performance tire seems pretty good to me. 50 MPH in the left hand lane of a freeway is not a good idea, and in enlightened states, is as illegal as 80 MPH in the left hand lane if not passing another vehicle. 50 MPH in the right hand lane of a freeway, however, is not dangerous -- the same cannot be said of the aggressive tactics employed by some drivers in an attempt to display their displeasure at, and superiority to, slower moving vehicles.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    She was twenty miles from home and 40 miles from work, where she absolutely had to get to. Knowing she had run-flats and that she could drive 100 miles on a flat, she proceeded towards work.

    She's a fool. She should pull off and get it checked immediately. Use her cell phone to call around for a costco, sears, tire store nearby.

    she could not slow down to 50MPH as traffic was moving at 75+

    Turn on emergency lights and EXIT the freeway.

    Mountain View BMW dealership

    Second foolish move. Dealerships screw people on any non-warrantied item (tires are about the only item not covered by warranty).

    When she reached the dealership, about 40 miles later, the rear left tire was shredded to pieces and the car could no longer be moved.

    Totally her fault.

    This happens because you have not been checking your tire pressure and that with 24,000 miles on them they've reach their end-of life

    Possible. Many fools never check their tire pressure.

    The cost for tires and labor will be $2000

    Typical dealership prices.

    The agent calmly explained that when you have run flat tires, you have to check them for correct pressure every two weeks.

    True. I do this with all cars. But I also notice changes in pressure when driving.

    Nice proposition for a luxury car owner &#150; having to stop at a gas station every two weeks to check your air pressure!

    If you can afford a BMW you can afford a $1 tire pressure gauge. It's 2 minutes of time to check and no more than 5 minutes to get them filled if you don't have a compressor at home.

    we called around to see if we could get a better deal on a set of 4 tires. No one around had the tires in stock except for a small Michelin dealer in Cupertino who could give us a comparable brand and model for $1200 mounted and balanced.

    This internet stud doesn't know of Tire Rack? He doesn't realize you can use non RFTs?

    they requested $150 for inspection fees. It took quite some arguing with them for them to remove the fees.

    She did drop the car off with a non-warranty related issue.

    Run-flats are supposed to last 100 miles at no more than 50MPH. It is very dangerous to drive 50 on a freeway,

    Emergency lights and get off the freeway ASAP.

    Cost of new run-flat tires is absurd

    Should have checked beforehand.

    especially through BMW dealerships, which will in most cases be the only ones that have them in stock for your model. At least currently.

    1. Only a fool expects to get service from a dealer at a reasonable price.
    2. Tire Rack has RFTs in stock. This guy is poorly informed.

    BMW dealership service centers are closed on weekends! (put two and two together)

    Maybe in your area. Dealers in SD are open; you should check this before you buy and you shouldn't take a car to a dealer for a flat tire.

    You can&#146;t repair a run-flat tire.

    You can. Ignorance again.

    Run flat tires make the ride bumpy AND as the thread wears, they get louder especially if you have sport suspension (trust me on this)

    Known. So replace with real tires or shut up as you bought knowing this.

    Run-flats are not available everywhere.

    Known.

    Most shops we called did not have what we needed for the BMW.

    Again, there's a fancy invention called the internet.

    There is such minor weight gain by not putting a donut in the trunk that it doesn&#146;t make it a financial or ecological benefit.

    Space.

    You must always check your run-flats pressure (?)

    This is a given with any car.

    BMW tire wear on the inside, check them well as you can&#146;t see it.

    Her fault for not checking pressure.

    Sports run-flats don&#146;t last long as the compound is gummier and stickier. They cost an arm and a leg. If you drive 25K a year, at an average of $1500 for a set, it will cost you $125/month for tires!

    Known. Do some research. I never get more than 15k out of my 18 inch tires.

    Have you ever seen a BMW service department open on a weekend?

    Saw it every time I had my 2003 & 2006 BMWs serviced.

    Unless BMW can come up with a way to put a spare in it, there's no way i'll be making the purchase.

    Buy go flat tires: easy to replace, get a run flat kit and live life. God, it's not that big of a deal.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    BTW, I rotated the tires (Conti SSR RFT) FTB on both sides at 6K miles. All tires were wearing very even on front and back. This was in contrast to the EL42 which showed shoulder wear that was very noticeable at approximately the same mileage on the front tires last year.

    Regards,
    OW
  • vrizzovrizzo Member Posts: 1
    I drive a 2006 BMW 325I with "run flats" Not knowing the full performance of these tires, I purchased the 5 year tire insurance. In 15,000 miles two flats. First one replaced at Discount tire---one hour wait. Second one at BMW dealer.
    Never had to change a tire. Yes they are expensive to replace but they don't go "flat" and damage a $300 to " $500 chrome rim

    We can't have it all, everything is a compromise.
  • adethieradethier Member Posts: 16
    you are right, everything is a compromise.
    You were lucky you were near a BMW dealership, and that they happened to be open. Imagine being on a weekend trip to Mendocino or such... then what?
    15,000 miles? Looks like you'll need 2 more tires in about 5-10K miles. Hope the insurance covers it.
    Really, it's nice to hear positive experiences such as yours -- it's actually rare.
    ...and you are right, we can't have it all. But i will take a car with a spare in the trunk over one without any day. :)
  • nkeennkeen Member Posts: 313
    Really, it's nice to hear positive experiences such as yours -- it's actually rare.

    Not that rare, I suspect, as BMW is still fitting them and selling lots of cars. Strong opinions on both sides of this one -- I do like my RFT RE050As, and wonder if the car would feel flabby on GFTs. Can't say without trying, however. One thing for sure -- the RE050As are much better than the flat-spotting W rated GFT EL42s on my old Acura TL, and in my opinion, they really weren't as bad as many seemed to think.
  • lipplipp Member Posts: 58
    blueguydotcom: Your last line, "God, it's not that big a deal" is classic. It really made me laugh. You seem to be making a big deal of it with your twenty four point, sarcastic overview to the writer. These people had a problem, and were only trying to relay it to other forum readers.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Their "problem" was totally their own fault. Ignorance, lack of research, lazy maintenance and lack of common sense are the "problems" in the situation.
  • adethieradethier Member Posts: 16
    Must you really research the tires when you buy a car? Shouldn't a trusted brand mean trusted experience? Ignorance is right -- perhaps too much trust with the BMW brand.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Actually, I think it's kinda tough to research these cars without running into the tire issue.

    In any case, let's drop the personal exchange and get back to the tires themselves. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.