Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Toyota joins NASCAR!
Who could have predicted this?
"In what has been common knowledge....Toyota announced on Monday that it would...compete in the 2007 NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series using the Camry..."
A hot rod Camry (?!) runnin' shine on the back roads of North Carolina with the revenooers in hot pursuit.
http://www.autoextremist.com/page3.shtml
"In what has been common knowledge....Toyota announced on Monday that it would...compete in the 2007 NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series using the Camry..."
A hot rod Camry (?!) runnin' shine on the back roads of North Carolina with the revenooers in hot pursuit.
http://www.autoextremist.com/page3.shtml
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Go to a race, look at what's in the parking lot. Of course there's tons of F-150's and Silverado's but more and more you are seeing, Tundra's, Camrys, Accords etc.
This ain't your fathers NASCAR!!
F1 could learn a thing or two from NASCAR in that respect.
Regardless of what your opinion is about the quality of Nascar racing, it is big business. Driver's fans are also very loyal (sometimes to an almost scary extent). I guarantee you that there will be a lot of Camries purchased by people that would never before even have considered one, just because their favorite driver drives one.
And now Toyota has had to build from the ground up a new pushrod V8 to comply with Nascar's rules. And they've done quite well with their motors in the Nascar Truck series the last couple of years.
And you would be correct.
Good article from Car and Driver on Toyota's effort in the Nascar Truck Series. I would expect their effort in the Cup cars to be very very similar.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=4&article_id=8125&page_number- =1
....and THEN they'll be getting drunk and lamenting the passing of the good'ol days....
Like it or not (I'm still undecided), NASCAR is well run and entertaining. To me, it will never match the glory days of CART for its combination of engineering and competition. Unfortunately, the engineering aspect made that organization unsustainable. Who in their right mind would scream down the back stretch at California at 260mph ....in traffic? Given what it is, NASCAR is good, competitive fun. Nothing more, nothing less. When looked at in that light, I sort of like it.
And, I don't think Ford, GM or DC wet themselves when Toyota entered the sport. DC certainly didn't cry foul when Toyota entered F1 and proceeded to fall flat on its face. They will be competitive right from the start. They may even win a few races and compete for the championship. I thinks that's why so many people gravitate to NASCAR. Winning is possible. Miss the right combination in F1 and you're out to lunch for a very long, expensive and frustrating season. Miss the combination for NASCAR's superspeedways and you can make up for it at the short tracks and road courses.
Yea, I figured this story would attract some discussion :P
NASCAR has a devoted audience of millions. They have (up to now) not tended to be Toyota/Lexus customers.
It should draw a lot more customers into the Toyota camp.
This could be the only manufacturer for which the money pumped into NASCAR is worth it. Toyota will get a lot of use out of this PR.
if you are right about napa, i don't get that. are they international?
Let's be serious - NASCAR has been a joke for about the last 20 years. It is popular because it gives people an excuse to get some sun, get drunk, and hopefully see an accident.
Even the sunburned drunks know the cars have absolutely nothing in common with what is sold in the dealerships. Well, except for maybe the ones who also believe Pro Wrestling is real.
are there any camry commercials during the games?
nascar is definitely sports-ertainment.
does not make it bad, though.
Bold statement. Do you have any way to back up your assertion regarding the money that Ford/GM/DCX dumps into NASCAR?
What makes you think they getting nothing out of it? The domestic automakers have been involved for decades; one would think that if they got nothing out of it, they would have stopped long ago.
I wonder how much benefit the manufacturers get from their participation in CART/IRL? Can you tell us what form of motorsport that the manufacturers get the most benefit from?
if you are right about napa, i don't get that. are they international?"
RedBull has been involved in F1 racing for a while - not exactly a low budget sport.
Just curious, what do you not get about Napa's involvement? They have sponsored the #15 Chevy for Michael Waltrip in the past, and will be sponsoring the #55 Dodge for Michael Waltrip this season. They will then go with Michael Waltrip in '07 when he races with Toyota. It makes pretty good sense that a supplier of automotive parts would sponsor a race car...regardless of the brand.
It would not surprise me if Nissan, Honda and Hyundai follow within a few years.
You heard it here first.
The truth in NASCAR is that the fan base is more loyal to the driver than anything else. Jeff Gordon is not going to lose any fans if he goes with Toyota. Some may be shocked, even disappointed, but in the end, NASCAR is more about driver ability than it is about the cars.
The cars are "set up" the way they are with the same aerodynamics, restrictor plates, engines (none of which are totally Ford, Chevy, Dodge, or Toyota), etc, to "even the playing field." The saying "There's nothing 'stock' about a stock car" is very true. And the truth is as someone pointed out earlier that the main differences in each model is the paint job and stickers.
Driving skills and a fast pit crew are what win races in NASCAR.
Additionally, sales of Monte Carlos are not going up if Jimmy Johnson wins at Daytona in a few weeks. People don't buy certain brands because they win races. People do, however, root for certain brands because they already drive them or they prefer that certain brand of car. I think somehow they feel validated in buying a Tundra if it wins the Craftsman Truck series. OTOH, as I said earlier, real NASCAR fans are loyal to their drivers. Why else do you see #8 stickers (Dale, Jr.) in the back window of Ford pickups? :confuse:
I would also encourage any of you who really want the inside scoop on NASCAR and how it began to visit Daytona. I had an opportunity last year to visit the NASCAR Experience there and to take a tour of the track and to be introduced to some of the history of NASCAR, which is quite interesting. In the very early days (prior to super speedways, high banks, and corporate sponsors), most anyone could drive the family sedan out to the race, run the race in that same car, and perhaps go home a winner. Toyota coming into the "sport" is in keeping with NASCAR's roots, because (and I type this with clenched teeth) no other car nowadays epitomizes "family sedan" more than a Toyota Camry. --I can't believe I just admitted that.
A real shock would probably be Dale Earnhardt Jr. driving a Toyota.
I'd have loved to seen a NASCAR race when it was closer to its good 'ole boy moonshine runner days. I could imagine what it would be like seeing Olds Rocket 88s racing Twin H-Power Hudson Hornets!
That describes "autocross", which doesn't have much of a fan base. (Regular street cars with better belts and roll cages.) Seems a bit like soccer in the US -- people like to play it, but not watch pro's doing it. But why that is, I don't really know, maybe it could be marketed and promoted.
Group B racing used to be somewhat like this -- it's what led to the Porsche 959 and Cosworth Fords in the UK, among others, because 200 cars had to be sold. I'm not a big racing fan, so I don't know why this was scrapped, but I would have thought that it could be a great test bed for new technology. What was originally in the 959 ended up in later 911's, for one.
Nope, autocross won't ever fly as a spectator sport in this country for one of the main reasons rallying doesn't have a huge following:
Americans want to see competition (head to head competition) between drivers. Not competition against a stop watch. For the most part, it ISN'T about advancing technology so the cars go faster and faster; fans want to see close racing.
There are two ways one can view autoracing:
It's either a competition to see which machine can go fastest (in which case fans like to see individual vehicles on the raw edge, racing against the clock, or with the lead vehicle 10-15-20 seconds ahead of their rivals). Fans of this type of racing are excited by huge numbers (mph, leads, quickest time, etc.) This type of racing is essentially man/machine vs. the race course.
OR they want to see very close head to head racing where guys are fighting each other all over the track and that extremely minor miscues result in PASSES. Fans of this type of racing are excited by numbers of passes, number of drivers who can win, how very minor changes in track condition/car setup can make an early frontrunner struggle late in a race or allow a team which struggled early to be strong at the end. This type of racing is man/machine vs. OTHER man/machine.
Are the speeds lower in NASCAR? Sure. Is the technology archaic? Absolutely. But, because the cars are so evenly matched, it makes the races much more exciting for the spectators.
I don't know about a series, but if you had a race that, as you said, had no restrictions so that any Tom, Dick, or Harry could race, then I think you'd see a great interest in it. They could start with qualifying races leading up to the big one.
As a Mississippian who has lived in the Deep South all my life, I can tell you for a fact that there are plenty of people who would jump at the chance to run their brand spanking new car (regardless of model) at Talladega if they had the chance - and they're not all toothless rednecks that go by two names like JimBob or BennyEarl. Many of them have more money than sense and they'd enter just to see if they have the right stuff.
Like I said, I don't know about a series, but I believe millions would tune in to see a bunch of average Joes run at Daytona or Talladega. It's one of those opportunities for the working man (or woman) to live vicariously through their neighbor. And for all those who drive whatever car wins to have bragging rights.
And besides all that, just think of how much money it would generate. The bodywork alone from all those amateurs who wreck their cars would no doubt reach the millions of dollars. You know the more I write about this the more I like the idea. Anybody want to sponsor my VW? :shades:
IMO NASCAR expands its fan base a lot by bringing Toyota on board.
When Honda, Nissan and Hyundai follow Toyota, NASCAR will gain even more fans.
(In rallying, Group N - I think that's the designation - is stock plus skid plates and a couple of minor other mods. The STi and Evo exist to satisfy that homologation.)
I can see the use of NASCAR advertising, but I don't think it's worth the money they put into it.
i was more thinking about the dollars put up as a sponsor.
I think that was one of the reasons it was so popular back in the day...you could watch basically the car you owned compete in a real race. As Ford said in the ads for the 1969 Boss 302..."closest thing to a Trans-Am Mustang you can bolt a license plate onto!"
A new Toyota Supra would probably do quite well in Trans-Am. They could even bill the series as a "domestic vs. foreign shootout"....could draw in a big, if somewhat opposed, crowd.
The only oval racing I like, which is very hard to find these days, is dirt track stock car racing.
Also GP motorycles are kinda fun.
I find sidecar racing fascinating too. I wonder how many calories the man on the chair (sidecar) burns per hour? Talk about perpetual motion!
You may be right about the chair man (monkey) losing 10 pounds during a race.
Odie
I expect there will be 2-3 more manufacturers seriously commited to NASCAR over the next few years.
Think how many more fans would come if they could see 'their' Honda, Hyundai or Nissan getting the Darlington stripe!
This statement itself helps to prove the point that has been made over and over about driver rather than brand loyalty in NASCAR.
I never was an Earnhardt fan, although admittedly I always wanted to watch him to see who he would "take out" of each race. I personally feel that Old School NASCAR died with Dale, Sr. He wasn't called "The Intimidator" for nothing. I think that's what has limited Jr's success. He lacks the killer instinct of his father.
But since you brought up Dale, Sr. here's a couple of questions to ponder: If Dale, Sr. was still alive and driving do you think he'd even consider driving a Camry? I don't think so.
Question 2: If he was still in his #3 Chevy coming off turn four at Daytona running 2nd behind a Camry with a Ford Running 3rd, and a Dodge in 4th, would he purposefully take out the Toyota and possibly let the Ford and Dodge pass him just to keep the Toyota out of the Winner's Circle on it's debut? I believe he would.