Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Tariffs to Help Domestic Manufacturers?
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
http://www.forexblog.org/2006/08/us_automakers_a.html
http://www.levelfieldinstitute.org/fact-sheet-yen.htm
Rocky
brightness, that wasn't just my family pal. It was everybody I knew in western michigan. In the mid 80's my mother was pulling down almost $14 buck an hour at GE. My father was making like $16 an hour. My other family members were making similar type of wages. The white collar family members and friends were making alot more than that obviously because college degrees weren't a dime a dozen like they are now. I doubt most Michiganders, will ever see as good of times as the 1980's.......
Rocky
Here is the real scoop: government bureacrats do not know the real prices when they intervene. Everyday when we as consumers individually spend our money, we are in effect voting on what each of us need or want. That's how the consumers and the market place can find out the differences between what is a reliable car, what is not; whether OHV engines are better or OHC engines are better; whose door handle chips nails, whose doesn't; to things as minor as whose fake wood finish look real, whose doesn't; or for that matter whether wood finish should be replaced by metallic finish. That's how market rapidly fluctuates between big SUV's and econoboxes as gas prices fall and rise, and economy doing likewise. None of that would be reflected in bureacratic decision making. To a bureacrat, a car is a car, period. That's how the Soviet Russia, despite their highly intelligent and highly educated citizens on individual bases, ended up making Lada's of 1950's design all the way into the early 1990's! and would still keep piling up those cars that are worth less than component material that go into them if not for the collapse of the Soviet Union. That's what happens when government is in charge of what gets made what doesn't, and whose job gets preserved. The result is everybody suffer because the bureacrats inevitably decide to keep status quo for political reasons and stagnate the economy.
West Detroit was potato country before the carmakers set up shop there. Most people there are descendents of people who relocated there from places like Ohio and Midwest farm country in search of those high-paying auto jobs. They can move again as the driving engine of economic productivity change to something else.
If you remember, American automakers have been complaining for the better part of this year that the Japanese government is depressing the value of the Yen in order to make Japanese exports more competitive
It talks about 'Japanese exports'. The Camry, Corolla, Solara, Matrix, Sienna, Tacoma, Tundra, Sequoia and some Lexus' are all made here in NA. There is no currency manipulation, nearly everything is in US and CA dollars.
So again, why don't Ford/GM just sell their midsized and smaller vehicles for higher prices and make more money?
Regarding the Level Playing Field 'Fact Sheet' just to be clear, the author is:
"Source: Mustafa Mohatarem, Ph.D., Chief Economist, General Motors"
Some of it may be accurate but some certainly is not.
Quote:
Cars produced here by Japanese companies also benefit heavily from this subsidy because of their high use of imported parts and components
This is false. The Sienna for example has one of the highest NA Content percentages of all vehicles in the US at 90%. The GM/F entries in the minivan segment were just horrible 'after thoughts' and deserved to be shot dead. They were. The Tundra and Sequoia are sold nowhere else except in N America.
Here is a huge problem for the UAW, but not for America. If you had your way and a tariff were imposed on all imports that would induce Toyota, Honda, et al to manufacture all their vehicles here in the US/CA/Mex. If that were the case employment here would soar but it would likely be at the expense of the UAW.
Rocky
http://www.chartsrus.com/chart.php?image=http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/fre- e/chartindCRUvoi.php?ticker=FUTDX
It shows the value of dollar compared to other currencies of the world. It's near record low! Kinda hard to accuse other countries of manipulating their currency lower when this is happening.
Where do you live brightness ???? $20-25 an hour isn't bad if you live in Tx or Mi. Does that include benefits ?
West Detroit was potato country before the carmakers set up shop there. Most people there are descendents of people who relocated there from places like Ohio and Midwest farm country in search of those high-paying auto jobs. They can move again as the driving engine of economic productivity change to something else.
The only sector that is hot right now brightness, is healthcare. Joe six-pack that graduates highschool can no longer go work in a factory and make a decent living learning with OJT anymore. :sick:
Rocky
As more and more cars get made here the playing field becomes more level. However the domestics haven't recieved the same tax giveaways like the Japanese, have recieved. GM, has pumped millions into certain plants and got little from the government. read below.......
Perhaps the biggest perception problem is that American automobile companies GM and Ford (Chrysler is now German-owned) squander all their money on plants overseas and foreign automakers build their factories in the U.S. Foreign car lovers will surely point to Kia’s plans to build its first-ever U.S. plant in Georgia, but they probably won’t mention that they received $400 million in tax giveaways to do it, which translates into $160,000 per job. Among the many benefits for the foreign-owned company, your tax dollars are going to be used for road improvements surrounding the complex, complete with flower beds and other beautification features. Hey, as long as we’re going to allow states to bid for private jobs with our public tax dollars, we might as well make it look good, right?
And the foreign car lovers will probably also not tell you (or maybe they just don’t know or don’t want you to know) that GM and Ford pour more money into existing American facilities than foreign automakers spend on new plants, usually with little or no tax breaks. GM has already spent over $500 million upgrading two transmission plants this year, and has spent nearly a billion dollars over the last decade, for example, for facility upgrades in Texas. And what do GM and Ford get for making their existing plants more efficient? It isn’t tax breaks. Instead, they get accusations of not being "competitive" enough! Maybe here I should also mention that the average domestic parts content for Kia is 3%, while the average domestic parts content of Ford and GM is 78% and 74% respectively. This means that buying a U.S.-assembled (or even foreign-assembled, for that matter) GM or Ford supports more American jobs than a U.S.-assembled car or truck with a foreign nameplate.
So again, why don't Ford/GM just sell their midsized and smaller vehicles for higher prices and make more money?
Well it's going to take time to turn-around GM/Ford. We are just seeing the beginning phases.....
Rocky
One of these days the japanese transplants will be unionized and toyta will do a better job handling it than the big 3.
Rocky
Rocky
kd, the Sienna and the Camry are the most american made out of the transplants. Yes the Sienna is 90% and some Camry's are as high as 87%. That is a good thing.
Rocky
The West German Wirtschaftswunder ("Economic Miracle") in the 1950's was very much the result of Ludwig Erhard's pro-market reforms. Instead of currency manipulations like the Weimar Republic did in the 1920's, Erhard chose a path of sound money, low taxes and freer market. That's how West German economy took off. Germans, west and reunified, have been living off that ever since. In any case, both Ford and GM have significant operations and sales in Germany, so Germany is not exactly protectionist. The relative lower number of Japanese cars may have to do with the fact that so far Japanese carmakers have been focusing on the US market in the past few decades. The German carmaker with the most government participation is VW, which is partly owned by the State of Lower Saxony. We know what a basket case VW is.
Norway is very big on free trade. It has no domestic carmaker, so every car is imported. Its low tax policies make the country quite a popular destination for foreign direct investment.
No, I'm not in healthcare. The high cost of healthcare pretty much shows the problem with government intervention.
Today's kids are hamstrung by massive debt before they even get out of the gate. Today, it's more like paying a 30-year mortgage. It's pretty difficult to pay off $100K+ from school plus your rent/mortgage. Forget about marriage and kids, especially when wifey also has a $100K+ student loan debt.
Rocky
That being said, be careful about some of these numbers. The tax incentives often quoted are not necessarily give-aways per se, but tax concessions; i.e. the money would not be there to begin with if the plant is not built.
Today's kids are hamstrung by massive debt before they even get out of the gate. Today, it's more like paying a 30-year mortgage. It's pretty difficult to pay off $100K+ from school plus your rent/mortgage. Forget about marriage and kids, especially when wifey also has a $100K+ student loan debt.
My wifes and I's friends whom are a married couple both are working on doctorates in communication studies and I believe both will rack up over a 100K each in student loans by the time they graduate. So over $200K in college loans @ 9% interest ......OUCH !!!!!
Lemko, you said it best college is getting out of reach for the middle class and poor. You got to have a rich dad like brightness to afford to go.
Rocky
Rocky
I agree with your mentality of pay a larger lump sum upfront and let the employees take care of the
rest-->retirment/benefits. I proposed this idea to the union and we've taken it to the company and they refuse to do buisness this way. :confuse: I'd like to bring it up again this contract.
Rocky
At least sis has good taste in vehicles. She drives a really nice Ford F-250 for her job. Bro-in-law is a snob with a Mercedes S-Class who always busts on me for my GM cars. However, it's pretty funny when my 19 year-old Buick is more reliable than his yuppie ride.
Lemko, How does someone rack up 100k in student loans and get out with a bachelors, is that what your telling me? That makes no sense. I am far from a right leaning Republican guy. However, I'm not a Government should do everything for us guy either. I'm with Brightness on this, the more the Government get's involved, the worse it gets. The big 3 need to figure out how to change their own diapers.
I do believe that people should have moral convictions about buying things from third world countries where people aren't paid a living wage and such. Just be a smart consumer which is what I believe most Americans are. That's why the big 3 are in the dumper and others are excelling. When the big 3 make a better product, people will buy it. That's the American way.
Rocky
Rocky
Rocky
US$ vs JY
In 1971 the US$ was super strong due to the fact that interest rates here were as high as 20% or more. There were 4 recessions in 10 years; housing was in the pits because mortgage rates were as much as double what they are now and no one could afford anything. It was cash or nothing in most cases.
The US$ 'bought' 350 Yen at that time, ( Now it 'buys' 118 Yen ). Why? The Federal Reserve made a concerted effort from about 1982 onward to bring down interest rates to stimulate business here inside the US. The lower the interest rates the better it is for all of us, right? Credit debt is less, the value of housing goes out of sight, auto loans can be as low as 2-3% stimulating auto production and the stock market goes out of sight making tens of thousands of 'paper' millionaires. This in turn hyper-stimulates consumer buying here in the US and local companies made fantastic profits during all of the 80's and 90's.
That sounds pretty good to me. The Federal Reserve did a great job of stimulating the market by driving interest rates to all time lows.
What else did this stimulation do? It drove down the value of the dollar to all time lows also. If interest rates go down the dollar is less valuable as an investment. Also every asset in the US is less valuable also; land, buildings, companies now are all 1/3 the price they were back in the 70's. This encourages investment here ( Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, BMW, etc ). A company in 1970 with 350Y Million to invest here could buy $1 Million in US assets. That 350Y Million today buys $3.1 Million in assets.
So here are your options:
.. let the Fed continue to manipulate the currency by dropping interest rates so that your credit card debt stays low, HELOC rate stays low, auto loans stay low, business and the stock market boom,etc.
.. let the Fed raise interest rates which will increase the value of the dollar vs the Yen for example but we pay for it at home with higher debt costs and a lower level of business here inside the US.
BTW, the Fed has manipulated the US$ vs the Euro in the opposite direction. Since the introduction of the Euro in the late 90's the US$ is about 15-20% weaker making imports from Europe more expensive and our exports to Europe less expensive. This stimulates business here.
Did you notice that the biggest manipulator of the currency is the US Federal Reserve.
Find some place else to go for cheaper.
Rice for instance, here in Houston. I doubt it's 100k for a 4 year bachelors, and it's got more job power/panache than U of Michigan. Plus, the economy is very stable in Texas.
I lived in Michigan for 4 years, I hated every minute of it. One of the most backward places I've ever been, and I travel a lot for my job.
We need to do that to asia, so they will buy our goods. Maybe in my grand kids lifetime we will see that ?
Rocky
As far as Rice, being a better school than the U of M ????Your kidding me right ? Rice, is nothing more than another West Texas A&M. If I went in for an interview at a big company and I had Rice on my resume. The hirring manager would go where's that in Japan ?
Rocky
100k for a bachelors is just silly for the most part. There are a few schools that you could spend that much money on if you didn't have any scholarships.
Yale is one that comes to mind.
MIT is another.
U of M is not in that same league.
Thats just ignorant everyone in the south knows what kind of school Rice is. They even have a little bit of a reputation out of the south.
OTOH prime state schools like NC State, UVA, UCLA, etc can be huge bargains.
If people are paying 100k for a U of M bachelors, then I rest my case.
I'd be very careful about "we need to do that" to anyone, but especially Asia. That's exactly what the FDR administration did in 1934, debasing the US Dollar and drive up the currency of China (siver money back then). The result was catastrophic. Instead of opening up Chinese market for American exports, the policy destroyed Chinese currency and its economy within the next dozen years, and enabled communist take-over there, with myriads of headache for the US for the following decades.
Currency manipulation is really quite an exercise in futility. What we need is sound money, and ratonal government. The rest of the world, especially Asia, will simply trust their savings to us. Much of the rest of the world is inherently insecure about their own future; that's why they save so much. So long as they save so much more than we do, our manufacturing can only compete at the cutting edge of technology, not the commodidized manufacturing like generic carmaking.
What ????? Texas, is still like living in the 1980's. My god people still get there kicks watching Hee Haw and the Andy Griffith show.....get real dude. :confuse:
Rocky
My five years at a public university in VA with me picking up the bill for the last year and my parents picking up the half the bill for the first year then financing the balance was around 20,000 but that only included one year of R&B.
I lived in apartments the rest of the years I was at school. So that is about 5,700 dollars a year give or take a few hundred dollars.
Rocky
I just looked it up.
http://www.finaid.umich.edu/financial_aid_basics/cost.asp
In state tuition plus R&B and books is less then that.
Out of state is of course higher but that is how it should be.
Total estimated cost for a freshman or sophmore including tuition, R&B and books is less then 21,000 dollars a year.
Tuition cost for UMich is . . . . . . . $8,200
Room & Board, etc. . . . . . . . . . $10,000
(much of R&B is living expense, one incurrs without going to college)
Grants . . . . . up to $12,200
Work study . . . . $2500
Loans . . . $3500
So, basicly the loan amount is $3500 a year, or about $15k after four years.
Rocky
If none of the schools in your state have the program you want then you can go to an out of state school for the in state rate.
I know several people who have done this.
Rocky