Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Classic? Collectible? Special Interest? Just Old?

24567

Comments

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    A Magazine called "Old Cars Price Guide" at most newsstands or on the internet at
    is helpful, if a bit too optmistic (they call it the "wish book", as in "I WISH I could get that price"...but it's a great starting point.

    On the web, you might check out this site:

    http://www.vmrintl.com/


    I think if you consult all of those you'll have a fairly good idea of what the value is....and remember, originality means a lot, so deduct accordingly for modifications.
  • jeb2447jeb2447 Member Posts: 1
    I have a "68 coupe le mans" 350 cid air, mint condition, all original, 54,000 thousand miles, two owners, white with torquoise interior, no rust, two barrel. i have run out of storage space, any idea who would be interested in this kind of car, who would tender the kind of tlc i've given it. car is in Miami, FL
  • goperronsgoperrons Member Posts: 1
    I picked up a 1977 Cont. Town Car for the right price (nada)but wonder how to establish its value. The insurance co. wants to know and I'm curious too; the old 460 purrs like new now that I've replaced the carb, & everything is ship shape
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    JEB--I'd say that Hemmings Motor News (www.hemmings.com) is your best audience, and a backup would be the Autotrader Magazine and website (www.traderonline.com). Both offer very affordable advertising rates.

    goperrons--the value of the /77 Continental is not so high due to it's being a 4-door, but I'd say $3,500-4,500 would be about all the money right now in the market.
  • louise_lordenlouise_lorden Member Posts: 1
    I have an '88 McLaren in excellent condition with 60,000 miles. Can you tell me how much it's worth and how to go about selling it? I can't find it listed in the blue book. Thanks!
    louise_lorden@yahoo.com
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Hmmm....are you talking about a kitcar based on the 6GT, something like the Marauder GT from Illinois? I presume you are not talking about a real McLaren racing car with that kind of mileage.
    What is the body material? Fiberglas? And what type of engine powers it?
  • sbarersbarer Member Posts: 35
    I would assume the post is regarding the McLaren version of the 88 Mustang GT...If this is the case, you're looking at about $5K give or take based on mileage and condition.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    OHHHHH....you mean the chopped ASC/McLaren Convertible?....ah, okay,...I always refer to them as the ASC/McLaren Mustang, not a McLaren...that really mislead me....

    Anyway, thanks sbarer, for un-misleading me...I'd say you're a bit hard on the car, more like $8,000 for a very very nice car...but, yes, I have seen them sell for $5K when the seller doesn't want to wait....the market is a niche, so you need to find just the right buyer for this type of car.
  • rea98drea98d Member Posts: 982
    Whats the difference between Classic, antique, vintage, collectable, or just old? I've heard these terms used so loosely that all I know for sure is a 98 Ford won't fit in any of them. Anybody know the difference between all these terms?
  • dranoeldranoel Member Posts: 79
    I'm sure Mr.S has an answer--I'll give you examples from my understanding of the terms: Classic-1939 Packard V-12,antique-1909 Locomobile, vintage-1938 MG TA, collectable-1956 Plymouth convertible,old-1948 Buick Super 4-dr.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    That's pretty good, dranoel....the "strict" definitions are set a little more firmly than that, but you've got the basic idea down.

    CLASSICS---the only true "Classics" are *certain* cars built from 1925 to 1948 exclusively, as determined by over 30 years of research by the Classic Car Club of America. The list is extensive, but does not all models of a certain make. Some makes have all their models as classics, like Voisin, Duesenberg, Horch, Cord...and others have most of their models, like Bugatti (all but the Type 52) or Packard (all but the cheaper cars). Ford has nothing on the list, nor does Pontiac, Chevrolet, and other common makes...however Chrysler has some of the early Imperials from the 20s and 30s.


    ANTIQUE---any car built before 1930

    VINTAGE--any car built before 1925

    BRASS ERA---shiftright is not quite sure, but he thinks this refers to pre 1915 Vintage cars.

    COLLECTIBLE--a virtually meaningless term, but it could be reasonably linked to the term MILESTONE CARS (i.e., all Milestones are Collectibles).

    MILESTONE CARS--a list of 1945-1972 distinctive postwar (World War II) automobiles, both foreign and domestic, which are chracteristic and significant to that era. This list is determined by auto experts belonging to the Milestone Car Society, and include a wide variety of cars in a wide variety of body styles...it's not nearly as "snooty" as the Classic Car list.

    SPECIAL INTEREST CARS--a polite way of saying that if one person wants one, it's a "special interest" car. It's like saying "you're special" to the kid in kindergarten who comes from Roumania and is shorter than everyone else.


    I think some attempt at definitions is good...while it's a free country and all, I really do wince when someone calls a 96 Impala a "classic". Try me again in 50 years.
  • C13C13 Member Posts: 390
    The CCCA is entitled to classify the objects of their interest however they like, as is anyone else. It's also not unreasonable to bow, for practical purposes, to their authority in the matter. I have trouble, however, with accepting their terminology as absolute.

    The term "classic" dates from Roman times, and is a reference to the earlier Greek "Classical" period. It was used to describe works of art and architecture that, in the opinion of the viewer, possessed certain attributes that the Greeks displayed in what they, the Roman patrician class, considered the old regime's finest work.

    In the eye of the beholder, a '96 Impala might indeed possess or suggest such qualities. Not to me, mind you, though on a strictly visual level, I'd saythat the design is successful. It's unified.

    Maybe cars themselves are inherently anticlassical. I think they're more Mycenean myself. Maybe Cycladic.
  • sbarersbarer Member Posts: 35
    I would be interested to see what list comes next for 72-? (2000?) Maybe we can call it the "Landmark" autos, with cars whose technology, style, performance, desireability etc.. made driving more than just a way to get to work and back.

    Cars like all Porsches (sans 912, 924 and 928...I'll allow the 914/6,)Acura's NSX, Audi Quattro, Corvettes from 84-C5, Cadillac STS (for Northstar alone,) Lancia Stratos, all Ferraris with the exception of the Mondial and 308GT4, all BMW's except 318/320's, Honda Prelude 4ws, RX7s, Mazda Miata, 280/300Z's, Lexus SC400, Range Rover,and just to get Shift's attention: the Viper!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think "landmark" is a pretty significant word, so many of the cars you list would qualify, but some seem far too ordinary, or say in the case of the Prelude 4WS, a flop (the public stood up and said "who cares?").

    The dictionary defines "landmark" as "a thing or event of historical or aesthetic interest". So right there some of the BMWs and RX-7s have to go (a BMW 528e is a landmark? NAH!)...the Miata a definite yes, nix on the Nissan 280 or 300, I'd say yes on the Lexus 400 (Scared the bejeezus out of Mercedes and BMW), Range Rover, yes, defined the luxury SUV market, Lancia Stratos, yes, one hell of a rallye car / Cadillac, I'm afraid not, unless one deemed a modern Cadillac that didn't fall apart historical, so in that sense, yes!--Ferrari, well yes and no, they made a few turkeys, but you weeded out most of them, so sure--NSX, Quattro, both definitely, Corvette, I'd say the C5 for sure, 914/6 is an interesting car but not ground-breaking in any way...sort of a VW-GTO maybe? Not sure about that one. Viper, maybe, as the last gasp of American brute power in the 20th century--only time will tell on that car.
  • jpstaxjpstax Member Posts: 250
    I found an excellent website for classic musclecars. Please check it out, give us your expert opinion. That is, tell us if the prices listed for the cars (for sale) are reasonable.
    The site's URL is:
    http://www.cars-on-line.com/musclecarsmenu.html
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Hi jp,

    Yeah, that is an interesting site, although I think it's kind of funny that 90% of the cars they list aren't muscle cars at all....they should know better!

    As for pricing, that's tricky when the car is a show car or trophy car or celebrity car--those factors throw regular pricing off. The real "market" is determined in the #2 automobile...the very clean, nicely restored car that one can actually drive....these trophy cars are inevitably over-restored (in the sense that they are put together much better than the factory ever did), are never or rarely driven, and thus are given the name "trailer queens". Anyway, trophy car prices can go way, way, up because of the tremendous investment and because some big-buck collectors only want pristine, unused, perfectly and accurately restored cars...and they'll pay for it. You got your trophy animals, your trophy wife, your trophy house and your trophy cars.

    But hey, free country....me, myself and I like cars you can drive, race, whatever...you crack them up, just fix 'em again.

    One of my favorite cars is a Bugatti Grand Prix car that races at Laguna now and then...it's worth god knows how much and it's painted with a brush, just like they did the original race cars. And it's beautiful because it's real.
  • carnut4carnut4 Member Posts: 574
    Must say there are some interesting cars there-but I agree most of them are "hotrods" or "performance" cars. The true muscle cars,as I understand it, are the '60's small bodied coupes with the biggest engines available-and a few from the seventies. Anyway-wish a few of those weren't sold already!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Exactly right for the "real" definition of muscle car, as auto historians understand it.

    Oh, there's no shortage of these cars, really, so another will come along if you ever get serious about owning one. It's just a question of tracking them down and eliminating the ratty ones. There is, unfortunately, a lot of "puffery" if not downright false advertising that goes along with these cars, so caution is in order...there are counterfeits (you can buy any decal or metal ID plate you want) and shoddy workmanship (bondo sleds--we call 'em "magnet-proofed cars"), to say nothing of cars that are just completely incorrect. So you could never buy one of these off the internet without looking at it or having it professionally inspected prior to sale.
  • carnut4carnut4 Member Posts: 574
    No truer words were ever spoken, Shifty. I've seen some of these "suspect" cars at swap meets here in the Northwest. Most of them seem to be late 60's early '70s Chevelles, with big blocks, of course. And I've seen a few suspect "GTOs" as well. When you go to a huge swap meet/carshow like the one in Portland, OR [in the fall and the spring-spring best] you see many phony, and many real cars. The excitement for me is when I see a REAL car. Not that I'm an expert, but I've been around the block a few times.[More than these 20-something-Honda-nuts] Anyway, it's interesting to cruise the car shows, and web sites like this--and just see what everybody says!! Shifty, you must enjoy your job-much more than some of the rest of us do??!!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I think cars can be fun if one is involved in them more than just on the nuts and bolts level....history is interesting, and investigation as well...but whether this or that car is faster than another or the Customer Satisfaction Index and all that, I don't much care. I think, like any other hobby/job, you need balance...involvement over a wide range, that what keeps things interesting.
  • vidabvidab Member Posts: 6
    Hallo, everyone!
    I am new to the discussion group. I would like to know if a 1975 BMW 530 Sedan would be of interest to collectors, old car lovers, etc. HOw much would a car like that be worth? What are the amenities that make it worth more?

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge and experience,
    Vida
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Hi Vidab, and welcome!

    In answer to your question, it's been my observation that so far, at least, a 70s BMW 530 has not been of any interest at all to collectors, as evidenced by their low current value of around $2,500 in good condition. While they can be a very nice used car to drive around, I think they will always be "only" that...a nice used car. Probably their rather conservative looks, cost of upkeep and 4-door sedan configuration all work against the car becoming a vehicle worth restoring. So far at least, only the BMW 2002Tii (fuel-injected version of the 2002) and the 3.0CS coupes have shown any "legs" as collector cars, being attractive 2 doors with decent performance capabilities. But even these two cars are not bringing really strong prices, so that doesn't bode well for the sedans at all.

    Best thing to do with a 530 of that era is find a nice one and enjoy driving it as long as you can.
  • vidabvidab Member Posts: 6
    Thank you Mr. Shiftright,

    Of course I am not very excited about the news but I very much appreciate your answer. So much for my 1975 BMW!
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Consider yourself lucky...you get to drive a nice old European luxury sedan and you didn't have to pay a fortune for it!
  • C13C13 Member Posts: 390
    The cars that are in very small demand are often the ones that most interest me. I'm not buying the thing as a financial investment. I'm buying it to enjoy. If I can later sell it at the same price or not much less, so much the better. Even if I take a financial loss on it, if I really enjoyed driving it while I had it, it was worth it.

    There are 2 old Audi 5000S Quattros (Mike Wallace Specials) that park in my lot at work. Some clean examples of those could be had for $1500 to $2000. I'm sure that they have their mechanical weaknesses, but for somebody in the market for a nice Euro-sedan on a tight budget it seems like a steal. It may yet happen that the public will catch on to that particular model, with its '60 Minutes' history and all, and it appreciates a bit. Not that I would expect that car to ever appreciate a lot.

    There are so many fine machines that failed to get marketed properly, or that are currently under-appreciated for just silly reasons. They may be long shots if you're interested in financial gain, but some of them are as much fun as the ones that *are* currently recognized as OK to collect.

    It's like those damned oldies stations on the radio. Not one of em knows or cares about which songs most influenced the multitudes of musicians who followed, or which songs represent a high point of musical or artistic development. All they know is "The Biggiest Hits!!!", and they play the same damned 20 or 30 hits over and over.

    Or the example from the art world that's always used is that Vincent van Gogh didn't manage to sell a single painting in his lifetime. A few years after his death they begin to command small sums. Now their prices have risen to the tens of millions. They're still the same beautiful images that made some 1890 French dude say "I don't care if people say it's overpriced at 20 francs. I like it." Was he wrong?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    The difference is that Van Gogh's paintings started from zero and went up...with an Audi 5000S, you'll start at $2,000, sink another $5K into those cruel and unforgiving money-pits, and end up with zero when you're done.

    The 5000s is a textbook example of a brilliant design poorly executed and everybody noticed (another contemporary example--Dodge Neon)...a Van Gogh is brilliantly conceived and brilliantly executed and nobody noticed...big difference!

    If you want an old car, popular or no, to play with, let's talk about it and maybe I can save you a lot of trouble?
  • C13C13 Member Posts: 390
    I can identify with that.

    It's all academic with me anyway. I can't afford a mid-70's, mid-level Schwinn. (Actually, I have just such an example in storage. Low miles. No major rust. Needs tires. Original paint!)

    My next vintage machine will probably be a 10 to 20-yr old Chev/GMC van (350, 4-bolt main). After that, a motorcycle.

    Alledgedly clean, early-80's Yamaha RZ350's are going for $2K. In touring bikes, Suzuki GS 850G's are in the same price range; maybe a little less.

    If a sportscar is in the stars for me at all, you've already helped me to confirm my interest in a Miata, MGB, Midget, 124, Giulietta or Duetto. Did I leave anybody out? If the budget permits, it'll be a 911; anything but a 2.7.

    But there still is a certain attraction to under-appreciated vehicles. The aforementioned motorcycles are extremely un-hot right now, though they were leaders in their day.

    The cheapest decent old Triumphs are 3 to 4K, Nortons 5 to 8, and BMW's 6 to 10.

    I dunno. Maybe I should just sell my '95 Civic EX for $10K and get an R69S.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    My old BMW motorcyle was extremely reliable, and very simple to work on...yes, you're right about the Porsche 911 2.7 engines...bad, bad, bad.
  • timmcguire1timmcguire1 Member Posts: 3
    In terms of rust and general deterioration, what do you think about storing a British or Italian two seater from the 60's or 70's in the $5-10,000 price range outside under a car cover in the Summer and in a garage only in the Winter when it would be started and used regularly but only in fair weather. This is in the Northeast near the seacoast. I can keep the car in a friend's garage a few miles away in the Winter but would want it in my garageless driveway during the Summer for frequent use. If I get a nice car, am I ruining it by not storing it properly or will being outside under a cover in the Summer not hurt in any significant way ? I recently rejected a well priced MGA because it was TOO nice - am I crazy ?
  • sbarersbarer Member Posts: 35
    Basically, being near the Atlantic will kill the car. Keeping it in a garage year-round is the best-bet. Honestly, a car cover can accelerate rust in many cases. If water gets underneath a cover, it can get trapped against the paint and bubble the paint quickly.

    Brits and Italians are notorious rusters. My advice is to find a nice Lotus Elan (Fiberglass.) You won't have to worry about body rust, but you'll need to frequently hose-off the chassis.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Salt air is definitely a problem if you're really close to the ocean....I think I'd stick to a "driver" type of car, that is, a decent car but not a restored one. Actually, just about ALL cars from the 60s are bad rusters, so it's not so much the type of car as the conditions you need to worry about.

    Another idea would be to consider a more modern convertible that is basically a "throw-away", since the chances of them becoming collectible aren't very good...like 80s Alfa Spyders, Miatas, VW Cabriolets (Rabbits)....all available around $4,000-6,000, all fun, all reliable, and all more rust resistant.
  • jjpowell2jjpowell2 Member Posts: 91
    This is our first time posting to this site. We have a real unique vehicle and can't decide whether to keep or sell. We ordered a 1991 Ford LTD Crown Victoria and took delivery in November 1990. A fantastic car in Lt. crystal blue clearcoat metallic with a twilight blue brougham roof. Once we got it home in the garage we REALLY looked it over. On one side it has LTD Crown Victoria and on the other it has Grand Marquis!!! Boy do we get the double-takes from people!!! The car is in near mint condition and has been such a dream to drive. Any others with a vehicle mis-labeled like this??
    JJpowell@win.bright.net
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Hi JJ,

    Well, that is kind of interesting actually, but if you're thinking that makes it worth any more, I personally don't think so, since it is so minor an aberration, is easily counterfeited, (how on earth could you ever prove you didn't do it yourself?) and anyway, it is not on an important car historically speaking.

    The interesting thing about factory "oddities" is that without documentation and without being of a significant nature, no one is willing to pay extra for them.

    So if I were you I'd rest easy and sell it if you wish.

    Host
  • jjpowell2jjpowell2 Member Posts: 91
    I guess it pays to be honest and from a small town. There would be no problem getting documentation from the dealer that the car was shipped from the factory with the Grand Marquis mis-label. There also would have been no way to switch the name without completely redoing the landau top as that is where the logos are....jj
  • badgerpaulbadgerpaul Member Posts: 219
    Mislabeling isn't that rare, in the mid 80's I worked at a Lincoln-Mercury dealer, and occasionally we would get a mislabeled car. Sometimes it would be as simple as the horn pad that had a Ford emblem on it. Once we had one that had a front fender that should have gone on a Country Squire. Since the car had already been sold they took a fender off a demonstator that was the same color, and delivered the car.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Yes, I see your point, certainly, but the greater point is that I don't think anyone really cares about such a minor thing like that. Really now, would you pay $1,000 extra over high Blue Book for a car with this mislabeling? Let's say I had a Mercedes 280SL worth $20,000, but I wanted $25,000 because the trunk lid says 281SL and I have a framed certificate from Ralph the manager of Des Moines Mercedes Benz that says came that way? Gee, even Frank Sinatra's old Pontiac Station Wagon only brought $7,800 at auction.

    I just don't see it myself, but hey, if you can the concept to someone, go for it! I don't wish to rain on your parade.

    Host
  • occupant1occupant1 Member Posts: 412
    I suppose something on this topic would go like this if I had to say something...

    My boss had a 1988 Plymouth Sundance...he took off one tail-light, cut the grille in half, exchanged a couple of wheel covers and emblems, and voila! He had one-half Dodge Shadow, one-half Plymouth Sundance. He even painted the car halves two different maroons...one was like black cherry the other was like a regular maroon. He did not do anything inside but it would've been interesting to make one half tan or something and the other half the original gray. A cut here, a cut there, swap out this door panel, cut the headliner, change the seat out, and there you go! Of course we silly people do things like that to our $500 cars.
  • str8jckt1str8jckt1 Member Posts: 3
    i need to know if someone can tell me the value of a 1963 Porsche with ABOUT 80, 000 MILES IN MINT CONDITION. CAN SOME ONE HELP ME OUT?
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Dear str8jckt1,

    There are a lot of variables to figuring out the value of a '63 Porsche, but if you're willing to answer the questions, I can help you.

    1. coupe or convertible
    2. which engine 1600C or SC
    3. B or C model
    4. sunroof if applicable
    5. Is the color correct and authentic for the year of the car?
    6. Is the interior (seating, carpeting) all correct materials (leather, german weave carpeting).
    7. Is the engine # correct? (Is the right engine in the car?)

    You'll need to know all or most of these things, because if, say, the color and engine are wrong, that alone is a huge deduction in value. Also, Cs are worth more than Bs, and of course convertibles more than coupes, and originality of interior also very important.

    Last of all, you need to know the condition of the body pan underneath, since these cars have no frame, so if the bodypan is rusted or damaged, the car may in fact be nearly worthless.

    So let us know as much as you can...

    Host
  • gormalmitygormalmity Member Posts: 6
    my girlfriends family is considering purchasing a 1973 rolls royce silver shadow and she wants me to find out "about" it. does anyone know anything about these? reliability, things to check out before buying it, approx worth depending on the condition - i can get more info if i know what to tell her to look for - etc. any information would be greatly appreciated.
    Nick
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I'm afraid I couldn't say one good thing about this car. It is the least valuable and least admired Rolls ever made, and aside from awful reliability, it is a money pit of horrendous proportions. (A complete brake job will...WILL..cost $6,000).

    I could best describe it as "a triumph of craftsmanship over engineering". It is an overly complicated gas eater with some serious engineering flaws. In the recent Sports Car Market Magazine, a most respected journal of classic car values, the Silver Shadow rates *one star*, which, when you look at the Ratings Table, says this, and I quote:

    "one star---Woof, woof! A dog that nobody cares about and most likely never will".

    I would strongly discourage your friend's family from considering it. If they want an old English car of similar style, buy a late 40s, early 50s Bentley Mark VI steel saloon...also not cheap to fix, but cheaper to buy (half the price), much better looking, and easier to deal with...and a far more sturdy automobile.

    The Rolls has been riding on a reputation that had merit in the 1930s, but not in the 1960s by a long shot. The new Rolls, with BMW power under the hood and German electronics, may prove to be a great car again someday.
  • gormalmitygormalmity Member Posts: 6
    wow, i never suspected it would be some kind of maintenance nightmare, but ill definitely pass that on. i figured it might be expensive to fix, but nothing like that. thanks a lot for the info. i dont know exactly why they were looking at this car, i think one just appeared on the local market and they thought "oh wouldnt it be neat to own an old rolls!" ill see if i can rid them of such a desire. once again, thanks shifty.
    Nick
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well, that's why people get into such a mess with these cars...you can hardly give them away, and therefore the price is quite cheap for a "Rolls". But the repair bills are frequent and staggering, and so they unload it on the next poor fool.

    But hey, if your friends have money to burn and want a toy and are going in with their eyes open, fine, then there's no crushing disappointment. But really there are far more fun and interesting and lovely cars to burn your money on.

    Have 'em e-mail me before it's too late.
  • additurpadditurp Member Posts: 9
    Looking into getting a Mustang. Just love the looks of the old ones. Will eventally get a couple to decorate my yard and switch-driving on Sunday to church but now, looking at:

    70 with a (shame) dropped in Falcon motor, vinyl top, yellow/black, auto - 3spd w.od. $1695

    67 Convert. 6 cyl. auto - $2900.

    Which would be better deal?

    Thanks for your effort.

    Robin
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Oh, the convertible I think...the 70 is a bastardized car and who knows how good the conversion was anyway...they could have done something dangerous. I'd rather you found a nice 289 V-8 for the convertible if you want V-8 power...true, you hurt the value, but you're not in very much anyway. The Ford 6 is a decent performer in the Mustang so you could live with it...it's not a sports car anyway, just a nice sunny day cruiser, so no problemo.

    if the car is decent, that's a good price for it.
  • additurpadditurp Member Posts: 9
    Looking into a 52 Ford pickup along with my Stang love...I love trucks...

    Asking price - $2800 or BO

    Is this a good deal????
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Sounds very fair if it's decent...
  • monalisa2monalisa2 Member Posts: 1
    I would like to know if anyone knows the make of the Cordova and if I am spelling it wrong. The car was made around 1962 to 1969.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    That would be the Chrysler Cordoba, made from 1975-83.
  • kswydenkswyden Member Posts: 2
    I need tp find a price for a 1997 Jeep CJ7.
This discussion has been closed.