Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
Just my two cents.
I also think the LX needs to be a larger SUV around 202-206" length.
Has anyone heard of any details on a totally redesigned LX?
I think it's loud, the RPM was at 4500 going 40 mph, the ride was rough as heck, the built quality was mediocre, I felt the gated shifter would break after a year or two, the exterior is totally ugly, the interior was almost as ugly, the amount of woodtrim was minimal for a "luxury" vehicle, the woodtrim+leather steering wheel looked cheap like the wood was glued to the leather and then the leather was wrapped around the plastic steering wheel at the dealer or something, that analog clock on the dash is a total joke, and that worthless Navigation system made me sick. The damn thing was not voice-activated or even touch-screen. It took the sales guy 15 minutes to figure out the thing and another 5 minutes to put in an address destination. That 3-D NAV is a joke since you really can't see crap with it. Heck, a $23,000 Honda Accord has a much better voice-activated and touch-screen NAV than the QX56. Come to think of it, a $23K 4-Cylinder Accord has a better leather steering wheel that actually looks like it belonged there.
IMO, the QX56 is not even in the same class as ANY Lexus vehicle. It's not even in the same universe.
The sales guy said, "The QX56 has the quietest and smoothest ride I've ever seen!"
What a liar! It's a joke.
Even being outdated, the LX470 is 100 times better looking inside and out than that stinking QX56. What a joke.
If nothing else, please realize some people here could have spent their hard earned money for this Infiniti and it does not do justice to them to bad mouth their vehicle to that extent. Just my two cents.
Regards.
If not, then stay out of it.
That was my true gut feeling after driving this vehicle so if you don't like it, who the heck cares?
Did you happen to get off the wrong side of the bed TODAY? Calling someone "childish" just because they were honest enough about their driving experience is stupid at best.
Have you even used NAV before or even know what it is?
I've used the Acura's NAV and the Lexus's NAV and they are extremely easy to use. Touch-screen makes it simple. With the QX56, you have to drag the cursor over each letter or number and click enter. This takes forever. If it takes that long for anyone to figure out a NAV system, it sucks.
I don't disrespect sales people as long as they are honest and know what the heck they are talking about. It's sad when I'm actually the guy telling the sales person about the correct features a vehicle has. It's ridiculous if I know more about the vehicle than the sales guy. I have friends who are car salesman, so I don't hate them, just in case you are wondering about my bias.
Perhaps you bought one of these peace of crap QX56. But that doesn't matter. I'm just speaking my mind about the VEHICLE itself, not any PERSON. If you disagree, then write your own test drive experience. Don't call people childish or accuse them of being disrespectful.
I think the QX56 is one of the ugliest peace of crap SUV. Then again, I think most SUVs are the ugliest peace of crap I've ever seen.
That's just my test driving experience.
Thanks.
tidester, host
Not surprised the Infiniti is rough riding given the FX models are harsh. But in general there is nothing out there that is as smooth as the Lexus SUV's. Once they spoil you with the great ride and extremely high build quality it's almost impossible to go anywhere else. Maybe a TLC - but that's staying in the family anyway. The Sequoia rides great as is - I can imagine that Lexus will make it as super refined as it gets.
So, there you have it, my two cents. Hope I didn't insult anybody with my opinions. The Q came closer to pleasing me than anything so far, but it's not yet going to drive me out of my Navigator.
I wonder if it will retain the go-anywhere-true-SUV platform instead of the pavement-driving-only-Semi-SUV platform.
Have you seen any spy pics of the next LX?
The LX will not get cheaper - it will likely stay the same and have upgrades that take it over $75k - upgrades that aren't available now. I'm still confused as to what happens to the TLC in all this. Does it become an entirely new vehicle, does it become the Sequoia and if so does the existing TLC and become a combo TLC/Lexus GX on a re-design. I've heard that the GX is only going to be tied to the Four Runner for the first model run. So maybe the GX elevates to the existing LX size when the new LX is built and that becomes shared with the TLC. Who knows but they definitely are raising the bar and the size of the LX from what I know.
I guess Motor Trend is pretty reliable.
DT
I was really looking forward to the test drive of the QX too because I think it has the interior room I wanted. But truck or no truck, it is suppose to be a Luxury Vehicle. Luxury to me means that it has extremely high quality, fit and finish, smooth, quiet, and beautiful to look at inside and out, but especially the inside since that's where I'll be when driving.
The LX is awesome in terms of quality and all that, except for the looks and size department IMO.
If the LX had the size of the QX, looks of the GX, and all the LX features plus the new features from the LS430, it would be a masterpiece IMO.
I guess if it were "Sequoia-like", it should be at least 203" length. But the QX at around 207" is great for size IMO.
I wish they'd hurry the heck up and get us something new and fresh. It's ridiculous when the GX has more style and modern features than the LX.
I mean the GX has 14 speakers vs. 10 on the LX's ML stereo.
The GX has integrated antenna instead of that old mass antenna.
Blah, blah, blah.
The GX has a better looking front grille.
The GX's interior looks much better.
Lexus seriously needs to replace the old LX ASAP.
But do they listen? Heck, no.
The LX is a low production vehicle, and is currently only in it's 6th year of production.
Since it is a low production car, it is kind of assumed each generation will run past the average 5 year production run.
I like the LX's new interior better than Gx...more classy.
As for stereo system, i actually found the LX to sound better than GX.
Actually the LX470 came out in early 1998 as a 1999 model.
Is it really that easy to do such a thing? Wouldn't he eventually have to "fess" up -- especially since he has it LEASED?!?
Also, I wanted to advise him of how morally reprehensible and ILLEGAL it is to do that but I'm wondering what the penalties are for such a crime?
tidester, host
anyone----anyone---
http://auto.consumerguide.com/auto/new/reviews/full/index.cfm/id/- 37908
If you get the GX, I think you will keep on wondering if you should have paid a little more to get the LX.
Thus, I think you should get the LX.
steering wheel needs to come off?? should my mech. know this procedure?? my kingdom for more info if you have it
thanks for the info. will put my guy on it.
your help is very much appreciated
biffer
1. I'm taking it to the mechanic to check it out and get issues fixed while it's still under warranty. Any particular area to pay close attention to?
2. What's the best source for OEM acessories?
3. The car drives great until ~65mph, then it vibrates quite a bit, any ideas?
4. Any other online sources for LX related information?
TIA to all!!
Ming
2) If rotating the tires doesn't change anything, your drive line is probably the culprit. You may be able to get it trued, or it may have to be replaced if it's been hit and damaged. Doesn't take much to make it out of wack at that speed.
Please respond ASAP.
KC
That price looks real good and its a phenomenal truck from my past experience - probably the best on the road.