Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
The next was my '79 Newport, which had a 135 hp 318 Lean Burn. It was actually quicker than you'd expect. Not as quick off the line as the Dart, but a much better highway cruiser, and it would easily get ~22 mpg or so out on the highway, most likely thanks to the tall 2.45:1 axle. In contrast, the Dart was lucky to hit 17.
The final was an '89 Gran Fury ex police car, with had a 318-4bbl with 175 hp. It wasn't as quick as the Dart off the line, but better at higher speeds, and could still manage to get about 20 mpg on the highway, despite having a 2.94:1 axle. All three of them seemed to get around 11-13 mpg around town, depending on the heat, weather, etc.
I wouldn't mind getting a '68-70 intermediate Mopar sometime...something like a Satellite or Coronet. I'd be quite content with a 318...enough power to live with if I wanted to drive it around alot, but not such a guzzler that it would break the bank. Only problem is, at this point it seems like most of those '68-70 intermediates are the musclecars, or clones of them.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I guess second runner up would the the Pontiac V-8. Two 400's and a 350. Pontiac didn't really do the big block/small block thing like Chevy, Olds, and Buick did, opting rather for a "medium" block that sufficed for everything. I think the 421, 428, and 455's were a raised deck version, but I'm not positive.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/que/cto/5032359636.html Nice looking if you can live with the scrape. I don't know how durable these cars were at this point
It's interesting these days. Bodies hold up so much better than they used to, so it's tougher to spot something that's end of life. These cars can look really fine from 10 or 20 feet away
http://newyork.craigslist.org/stn/cto/5021237094.html A bit of charm and the miles are low
http://newyork.craigslist.org/stn/cto/5038996070.html Be an extra in a B movie
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/cto/5047952830.html First car for a domestic fan?
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/cto/5046901855.html Granpas car with white letter tires
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/cto/5057822236.html Stickshift Camry with moonroof.
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/cto/5057872657.html Dodge Stealth
http://newyork.craigslist.org/lgi/cto/5057670576.html Audi S4
That Caprice is cool! I love the throwback photo.
The Camry looks interesting, but a LOT of miles. That Audi is something else, though. What is a Manuel? Is that some special edition package? Or, is this car possessed by Manuel's spirit? I thought maybe a mistype of "Manual" as in transmission type, but that only flies to mislead people *if you don't include a photo of the automatic shifter*. LOL
S4 Has an 'Manuel' transmission with a PRNDL shift pattern. Must be rare.
Some poor guy with a Rang Rover flunked. Some code related to evaporative emissions.
A little pricier at .19 cents a pound: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/5042780714.html
Good on Gas! http://sfbay.craigslist.org/scz/cto/5023231427.html
Friendly Ad, reasonable price. Why hasn't it sold? http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/5058843600.html
Assisted Suicide: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/cto/5053108002.html
I like the per pound pricing, maybe I can get some more off with my grocery store rewards card.
A Vega with an engine that smokes. Who would have thought? and an extra zero in the price.
Maybe that Corvair was the mule Porsche used when designing the 930 turbo.
I have noticed over the past few years that when the rare 'regular' Vega comes up on eBay with a solid body and good interior, original paint, etc., it is often bid as much if not more than even Cosworths which are almost always on eBay. Just saying.
A company named Crown Engineering did offer V-8 kits for the 65 on up Corvair. They called it a 'Kit" but you pretty much had to tear the car apart.
The guy wanted to give me a ride in it and I declined.
I don't know what kind of a transaxle he had in it.
Then we had a kid in town with an old VW bug with a Corvair engine. I watched him whip
a Mustang 289 with it!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
It's got a 428 in it---oh, wait, it doesn't. Oh well: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/cto/5014477333.html
A '55 T-Bird that only needs $75,000 worth of work, and with a truck engine. Could be worth a cool $40K when you're done. How could anyone resist?: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/cto/5006789745.html
Well yeah if it were a 409, but it's not, so cut your price in half: http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/cto/5045276759.html
Let's see. Missing lots of parts, owner listed on title is dead, and it's rusted. Hard to resist! http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/cto/5033553125.html
and in general, if you can't be bothered to take the tarp off to take pictures, don't expect me to be interested.
now, I like the Datsun wagon (have never seen one of them before). But to do an oddball resto mod of some sort. A hot modern motor and upgraded suspension? Keep body stock, and make it a sleeper. and yes, I realize that would be a giant flushing of money down the toilet. So someone else should spend a fortune on it, then sell it to me for $.10 on the dollar!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Here's the test: http://www.xframechevy.com/mechanix-illustrated-a-road-test-of-the-1959-chevrolet-impala/
IMO, it's not very impressive. 0-60 came up in 13.1 seconds. The 348 in the test Impala was rated at 280 hp gross, which seems awfully low to me for an engine of that displacement, especially with the Tri-power setup. For comparison, the 341 in my '57 DeSoto has 270 hp, and that's just with a 2-bbl carb. And even though the Impala was porking up by then, I'd imagine my DeSoto was still a heavier car. Yet I've seen road tests that would put mine at around 9.7 seconds in 0-60.
I've heard that the TurboGlide transmission was pretty bad. Did it sap a lot of power, maybe? Or perhaps it took too long to upshift, or upshifted too soon?
McCahill did mention that he tested a '58 Chevy Impala and 0-60 was 10.4 seconds. Doesn't mention which engine or transmission though, and I couldn't find that test when I googled for it.
My guess is that the biggest problem with the 348 is that it came in a fairly wide variety of configurations, so some people might remember it as a dog, while others have fond memories of it. It just depends on which version they remember.
I'm not a fan of the flat-top four-door hardtop styling, either, but I did like how they did the two-tone that year (trunk lid white too).
I could probably enjoy a two-door hardtop if it wasn't red, black, or white.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
If I was a low-end car buyer in 1959, and not overly brand-loyal, I think I would've just skipped Chevy/Ford/Plymouth and spent a few more bucks on a Dodge Coronet or Pontiac Catalina. If I was a Ford-hugger though, I guess I would've still stuck it out with one of their models, as I really don't look at the Edsel as an improvement, and Mercury at that time was a bit pricier...dabbling more in Olds/Buick and DeSoto/Chrysler territory, than Dodge/Pontiac.
As for that 4-door hardtop roofline, I don't mind it too much on the smaller cars, but when you get to the longer-wheelbase models, like the C-bodies, or even the Bonneville, I think it looks a bit awkward.
I always thought the 59 Plymouth was a nice looking car. The 59 Ford sold very well because of styling cues from that Squarebird which had gained popularity by then. Now that 59 Dodge you like was pretty over the top in some styling respects, but that kind of made it attractive also I think.
The Dodge is definitely a bit over-the-top in its styling, especially the way they swept back the "brows" over the headlights, but somehow it still seems to work, IMO.
I think the Dodge is a bit over-wrought up front, especially the chromed "brows" over the headlights, but somehow the style seems to work more or less, for me. With the Plymouth, I think if they didn't do that little dip between the headlights with the fender tops, it would help fix some of the styling. But I still don't like the way some of the textures and shapes seem to clash. I'll admit though, with age, I'm softening a bit on the '59 Plymouth, too.
I definitely prefer the front end of the Dodge, but WOW they should have continued that theme on the rear. I suspect those bullet tail lights are just a hint of the garish rear. That said, there were a couple years in there (was it 59/60?) where the uglier, the better (that applies to all American marques of the time, not just Dodge). LOL
The Dodge seems to me to just be a continuation of '57-58, although the taillights are a bit exaggerated, and look like they're just begging to get snapped off. In contrast, I think the '59 Plymouth rear is a nice update. Something about it almost seems a bit European to me, like if you squint your eyes enough or drink a bit too much, it could bear a faint resemblance to a Fintail. I think it's the placement of the taillights down low, and the chrome trim at the end of the fenders that make me think of that. And I like the way the trim line on the side starts to form a crease along the side and wraps around the back, forming the lower edge of the decklid.
It also seems that for '59, Plymouth was really starting to shake off two-toning. When I was searching through pics online, many of them were monotone, like the one I used, and if there was 2-toning, it was just a roof contrast. Sometimes the strip down the side was part of the two toning as well, but in other instances it looks like it was gold or silver (probably just on the Fury)