Disc vs Drum. okay- While true about cooling advantages of the disc brake there is a major drawback and design problem with the disc/ caliper design. The problem is constant rubbing of the brake pad against the rotor.
I see this on all disc brakes. See for yourself. Remove the wheel and try to spin the rotor- it won't spin freely. Why? because the pads always touch the rotor causing friction and a constant braking effect. I expect this is worse when the pads heat up.
On the other hand drum brakes do not have this rubbing problem because the shoes retract from the attached springs.
Voyager: Was your car in park or was the e-brake on? Otherwise, did you have it in gear? Or, was opposite side wheel still touching the ground? All of those things would have made the wheels not spin freely.
Voyager: The piston retracts once the brake pedal is released. If such were true then you'd have to change brake pads very often. Maybe there was a problem with the brakes you were looking at or the reasons tedediah suggested.
Friction is an aspect that is fixed in both disc and drum brakes. Friction causes heat - overheating causes the drum brake to sometimes not work. Regardless of how cold it is, with friction, heat occurs.
If the car were light enough, and didn't have tremendous horsepower, drum brakes would be perfectly adequate. The 1965 Corvair had drum brakes which were excellent, and comparable in performance to disk brakes. So the problem is that most modern cars and trucks are just too heavy for drum brakes anymore---you'd need gigantic finned drums to deal with the heat buildup. This was also true of most "classic" cars--they were conspicuously underbraked because of their weight.
Drum brakes don't get wet like disc brakes which causes braking loss. Disc brakes are not self energizing like drum brakes Disc brakes have much higher maintenance cost due to: 1- Calipers can't be repaired as easy as wheel cylinders 2- Rotors rust quickly 3- Rotors warp Disc brakes harder on the environment due to high frequency of rotor and caliper replacement compared to drums Wheels are forever dirty with disc brakes Disc rotors and calipers are heavier than drums and wheel cylinders
If what you wrote was really accurate, you wouldn't see disc brakes on just about everything that is made today. Even heavier trucks have disc brakes since they greatly out perform the older drum designs.
I am a full time automotive technician and rotors for the average sedan (even the ones that have the e-brake as a drum within the rotor) run about $20-$30 each from O'Reilly's - whereas the average drum for the common rear brake runs $40-$50. It is true that shoes are a little cheaper than pads and wheel cylinders are a little cheaper than calipers, but my average drum job is more expensive than my average rotor job, plus it takes me twice as long.
I dont mean to disagree with thecardoc3, but every Semi Truck and trailer I have ever seen has massive drum brakes. The reason being that drum brakes do indeed have more stopping power (more surface area and more positive applying leverage) Heat, as stated before is the issue that common drivers do not understand or account for, whereas truckers understand (usually) how to apply their brakes intermittently to allow for cooling.
It has always been my assumption that pitted against one another on vehicles of identical weight, that Drum brakes would bring the vehicle to a short quick stop from medium speed much faster than disks - but disks would maintain braking power over longer faster stops due to their ability to dissipate heat... I would like to see a test such as this done
Comments
www.ericthecarguy.com
Replacing Drum Brake Shoes Part 1
Replacing Drum Brake Shoes Part 2
Enjoy.
b.
I see this on all disc brakes. See for yourself. Remove the wheel and try to spin the rotor- it won't spin freely. Why? because the pads always touch the rotor causing friction and a constant braking effect. I expect this is worse when the pads heat up.
On the other hand drum brakes do not have this rubbing problem because the shoes retract from the attached springs.
I think the drum is better.
Voyger7
Friction is an aspect that is fixed in both disc and drum brakes.
Friction causes heat - overheating causes the drum brake to sometimes not work.
Regardless of how cold it is, with friction, heat occurs.
Disc brakes are not self energizing like drum brakes
Disc brakes have much higher maintenance cost due to:
1- Calipers can't be repaired as easy as wheel cylinders
2- Rotors rust quickly
3- Rotors warp
Disc brakes harder on the environment due to high frequency of rotor and caliper replacement compared to drums
Wheels are forever dirty with disc brakes
Disc rotors and calipers are heavier than drums and wheel cylinders
You can have your disc brakes.
I dont mean to disagree with thecardoc3, but every Semi Truck and trailer I have ever seen has massive drum brakes. The reason being that drum brakes do indeed have more stopping power (more surface area and more positive applying leverage) Heat, as stated before is the issue that common drivers do not understand or account for, whereas truckers understand (usually) how to apply their brakes intermittently to allow for cooling.
It has always been my assumption that pitted against one another on vehicles of identical weight, that Drum brakes would bring the vehicle to a short quick stop from medium speed much faster than disks - but disks would maintain braking power over longer faster stops due to their ability to dissipate heat... I would like to see a test such as this done
(and welcome)
Here is a video. Those are some huge calipers, not even counting the diaphragm.
Nonetheless, there were cars in Europe winning races at incredible speeds (even by today's standards) with drum brakes.