By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
If I knew more about cars, it would probably come down to more sophisticated and technical thinking. But as it stands in will mainly be in the feel of the test drive, seller/dealer negotiation and what my wife and I (o.k. - her) decides is best.
There is nothing wrong or unusual at all with your approach. I initially form opinions on cars based on technical specs but after test drives my own impressions make the decision. Sometimes my impressions don't agree with what the technical data would suggest, and in these cases I either trust myself or go for more test drives.
The only type of buying I disagree with is emotional purchasing. Buying a car simply because it's new and you "love" it is a bad idea. It's also an easy way to find yourself paying too much. Evaluate them critically, don't let novelty or appearance convince you to purchase. But in the end it's an individual's choice and their money so they can buy for frivolous reasons if they want.
-Colin
I am analytical minded but I still don't know cars. I can and do study consumer reports and what edmunds has to say as far as comparisons go, so when I do get to the bargaining table and decision time, I know what the pluses and minuses are and can walk away if the car doesn't live up to my expectations.
I live in S. California and have a family, therefore, I cannot afford to be frivolous
Thanks for your feedback.
-Leif
Don
The bad:
Its even more ugly up close. I'm not kidding...there is a good reason they try and not show that back end in commercials and mags. Even in the show room they had it covered with a tent thingy which was acutally pretty cool.
BUT I will eat some of my words.....Its actually a good idea. Its just poorly carried out.
1) It has lots of room.
2) Seats (front) and ergo were both very good except the Buck Rodgers meets Mad Max touches. Check out the vents if you get a chance.
3) Its not really that bad from the inside. Think of a word that means the opposite of classy and your in the right ball-park.
4) Drives OK but really floaty and leans in turns.
The one I drove (Aztek GT) was on the lot for $28,500. They also had one there for $23,000. Thats the exact same range as the Subaru OB (2000 model year)!!!! Perhaps I made a mistake with my OB Ltd......OR PERHAPS NOT.
They want to sell 25,000 this year. I will up my estimate from the 7 (seven total) to 10,000 units. They will start selling if offered with $3500 in incentives.
Stephen
Stephen
Stephen
- OB looks way better (Couldn't belive that it was actually a real world car when I saw it drive off at the end of Survivor)
- OB has Subaru's AWD
- OB is made by Subaru
The only thing that I can see is better in the Aztek is the engine, but it's different if you compare it to the 2001 VDC.
Maybe actually driving it is the difference.
Jeff
For the life of me, I can't imagine how any of them could say that the handling was excellent. I mean, come on, it's basically a minivan! This means that handling will be okay, competent, and perhaps even good (to a certain extent), but by no means excellent or fun; well, perhaps as fun as a minivan can be. Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the FWD Aztek use the minivan's solid rear axle? At least the AWD version has an IRS.
Looks aside, all of the gizmos and gadgets are not enough to win me over. What's the use when the basic driving elements of the vehicle are not on par with many other competing vehicles. Ah well...enough of this ranting. :-)
Thanks for your time!
Drew
P.S. I've seen zero Azteks around here, even though I live only about 7 minutes from a very large GM dealership. Then again, there is a VW dealership, a Toyota dealership, a Mazda dealership, a Chrysler/Jeep dealership, and a Honda dealership all within just 10 minutes from my place too :-)
I predict 2k OB with PII engine and limited slip will have good/excellent resale value. Not that it really matters to us because, like MOST cars that we have owned before, we are gonna drive it until it dies.
Now think about the Aztek. My prediction is the the plug will be pulled for a small flusing sound in 3 years or less barring a MAJOR, MAJOR, MAJOR redesign. So whats that gonna do for resale? Perhaps it will become a classic and worth millions in 20 years.
I have been looking but I have not seen a single Aztek on the road yet. I wonder what the sales number look like?
My facination with the Aztek stems from what I belive to be Pontiacs version on an OB. The major reason that people buy the OB are as follows according to my wife:
1) It looks cool. In particular, my wife seems to think it was designed to appeal more to women. Consistent with this, I really dont like the looks of the OB (cladding, two tone, big fog lamps bug me). I prefere the monochrome GT look.
2) Very reliable. Appeals to everyone.
3) Subaru AWD is a house hold name by now.
4) Crash tests have been good. Everyone.
5) Not everyone else has one. This was true for our 2k OB Ltd. for about 2 months. This did play a small role in my wifes decision. Random people would ask us about it. After the sat in it they could not believe it was a Subaru (leather, wood, CD-changer, so on).
This is where my facination with the Aztek design begins.....
So in this case if you buy an Aztek you will get something that looks VERY unique (I'm being kind). But where else does this begin to compete with the OB? It does have more space but come one!!! Were they planning on finding a new niche? Were they smokin' doobies????
My understanding of "Hidden Responses" is that they are intended for subjects that are not necessarily part of the normal discussion at hand; meaning, if you're not interested you don't have to read them.
Okay, if that's the case, then why am I "more" inclined to read these "Hidden Responses" than not? Is it the "I-need-to-look-at-a-car-wreck-instinct" coming to surface?
While "Hidden Responses" sound like a good idea at first, I'm willing to bet just about everybody on these boards read them. So, what's the point?
Bob
Bob
Better yet, would love to see Subaru sponsor the show.
-Lee
As we all know, Subaru has announced that there
will be new ST-X pickup in MY 2003.
RUMOR:
They have not announced that there will be a new
Forester in MY 2003, but it's pretty well known
that there will be one.
FACT:
In the past Subaru, because they were small and
relatively poor, had to have long model runs, as
compared to other car brands. Most Japanese car
models are in production from 4 - 5 years. Subaru's model runs have often run well beyond 5 years.
RUMOR:
If there is a new Forester for MY 2003, as
predicted, that signals a change in Subaru's model
run life cycle. The current Forester was introduced as a 1998 model. If a completely new model arrives in MY 2003, that will be 5 years for this particular model. Could this be the start of
something new in model life cycles for Subaru? Will 5-year model life cycles become the norm at
Subaru?
MY 2004 will be the 5th year for the current Legacy/Outback. Could we see a new Legacy/Outback in MY 2005, which, incidentally, is also about when the new Subaru/GM larger SUVs will debut? Will this new SUV be built on the current Outback platform, or the next Outback platform? My guess it will be the next, if only because the current one will be considered "old" by 2005.
FACT:
The ST-X concept pick up is based upon the current
Outback. It was built to see if the public would
consider a car-based pickup, and to test-market
some styling concepts. Apparently Subaru feels
there is a market for such a vehicle.
RUMOR:
If there is going to be a new Forester in MY 2003,
wouldn't make more sense to build the new "production" ST-X off the new Forester platform,
rather than the Outback platform?
As we all know the Impreza is built off a
"shortened" Legacy platform. The Forester is built
off a "lengthened" Impreza platform. Why couldn't
the ST-X be built off an extra-long Forester
platform, using the front end styling from the next Forester, rather than the Outback?
Actually, what I'm really talking about is putting
the Forester front end on a lengthened Outback
platform to create the ST-X.
From a marketing standpoint it makes sense. That
way the Forester and ST-X would grouped together,
much like a Chevy Tahoe/Suburban and Silverado
(tougher truck image), and the Outback would remain the "premium car" (not truck) in the public's eye. It's all marketing and product image positioning.
Bob
RUMOR: Bob's wife is a saint. This was supposed to be a honeydew day, but Bob is enslaved to his computer.
FACT: We appreciate Bob's input.
RUMOR: Bob's gonna give me a whoopin at the next meet.
Ok, someone please post something intelligent about Bob's thesis. I lack the gray matter necessary for a retort.
Getting back on track: Bob, wasn't the ST-X concept built on an Outback platform? I realize that might have been for simplicity of building a one-off, but it adds credibility to your idea.
..Mike
PS - In case anyone missed the subject, I'm just gently tugging on Bob's leg.
..Mike
"Thank you for visiting the Subaru Web site and for your interest in our Impreza models. We will be directing our future performance strategy toward the Impreza. We plan to make the next-generation Impreza our performance leader. It will also feature a turbocharged model. Details about this model are not being made public at this time. The next-generation Impreza is scheduled to be on sale sometime in 2001 calendar year as a 2002 model. It's also too early to say exactly when."
FYI J.d MacDonald's character Travis McGee drove one called Agnes it was a cutdown Rolls!!
Drew
Frank P.
Gotta love that testimonial. Oddly, it's followed by:
.. — while the vehicle has a bit too much road noise at highway speeds. It seems like we’re nit-picking a pretty good thing — and we are ..
And then there's:
Unfortunately, it comes bundled with those weird gold-accent wheels, ..
Thanks for the link, Drew.
..Mike
..Mike
"Seating too low, to feel secure"? I actually feel more secure at that height as opposed to higher seating in CR-V or XTerra. No "tippy" feeling yet a better view of the road...
It sounded to me that reviewers were VERY partial to Ford Escape/Mazda Tribute. They called it "real SUV" which is not.
Ahh, who cares... did I mention how much I like my new Forester?
I do agree with them about the 3 rear headrests blocking your vision. That's why the first thing I did when I got my Forester was to remove the middle headrest and toss it in the garage.
-Frank P.
Subaru should not be afraid of comparisons to the Passat 4Motion. I drove the V6 FWD Passat at Edmunds Live, and that engine is simply a DAWG. Why bother with high tech and 30 valves that require premium fuel if the output stinks? The VR6 is a better powerplant.
And that was FWD, imagine AWD. I've seen a wagon tested at mid 9 second to 60, while Subaru's estimate for the H6 is a full second quicker, and they're usually conservative.
The LL Bean is a closer match in features, and will be quicker, cheaper, and more reliable. The Passat can't tow anything and the roof rack is flimsy so it also offers only half the utility of the Soob. The leather seats are also rock hard, and the interior is cold.
I like the Passat in other ways, don't get me wrong, but I actually preferred the 1.8T with cloth seats!
Passat Plus and the future upmarket sedans are targeting Mercedes, in reponse to Mercedes going after the Golf with their A-Class. VW is feeling a bit too cocky, if you ask me.
Bob: I like the Forester with the rear multi-link suspension idea. That would be great.
Drew: nice rear dust deflector. That may be my next toy!
No flares on the Impreza wagons? Why not? They're calling them sport wagons and giving them turbos, so why not the look to go with it?
Mike - I'll step up and play Devil's Advocate with Bob. The Forester was out in Japan earlier, so the life cycle isn't as short as it seems. The ST-X will remain Outback-based. The new Outack won't arrive until 2005 or 2006, I'd guess.
On the WRX - yes it'll cost more than the base Prelude, Integra, Celica, and GTI, but it'll offer more performance (none of those break 200hp).
Today, it's the cheapest and least powerful, but the others sell more! The GTI GLX and Prelude SH are already priced in the mid 20's.
One more thing - I do not think GM will use the H6. I read that they were looking at a transverse mounted V6 in a Subaru platform, though.
-juice
Again, the ST-X was put to test public reaction, and building the concept vehicle (quickly & cheaply) off the Outback platform made the most sense. That's not to say the production vehicle will necessarily be built off that platform.
In reality though, the Impreza, Forester and Legacy/Outbacks are so similar, it probably doesn't matter which one they "say" it will be built of off. My guess is that it will share a large number of components from both the Forester and Outback.
Bob
Someone joked with me that Subaru only makes one car. The Impreza is a shortened Legacy, and the Forester is a lengthened Impreza.
A bit of a stretch, but I was amused nonetheless.
-juice
I fear the day we see a beautiful design like the Legacy GT whore'd out to look like some sort of Pontiac....Subaru doesn't need all the gimmicks and hoopla that GM cars usually do to sell(Aztec, Bonneville). They have something that GM doesn't....(ready for this) quality of design!
-mike
I know small car-based pickups are still very common on virtually every continent except North America. These, however, are 2-doors; and marketed as commercial vehicles.
Bob
Brazil has a bunch of those car-based pickups. They had one based on the Chevette, the Fiat Uno, the Escort, you name it.
-juice
It made me laugh. for a moment
-juice
Frank
-juice
As long as Subaru keeps the pricing fair. I will still eye them. My car may not have the refinement of a similarly priced VW. But I'd be damn if I see the dealership for fixings more than it sees my garage!
So far (touch wood), my OBS has taken me thru some wacko situations and it's not showing any signs of lethargy. Heck it's even asking for more. As some of you may hvae known, I mod this car since day 1. So as long as the quality of design is still up there, I am game.
I like the TT a lot, though. It's about style, really. I sat in one, and then a Honda S2000 back-to-back, and frankly Honda should be ashamed.
Haven't driven one, tho. Reviews weren't great. Call it a poseur, I guess.
The WRX will be ugly but have giant-killer performance. Now that's a sleeper.
Honestly, I just can't wait to read reviews about a "mere" Subaru crushing pricier competitors.
-juice
My wife has a 626, so I've been lurking there for a while, and the consensus is that the 4 cylinder automatic is the only unreliable 626 model. The 5 speeds are Mazda units, as is the V6 automatic tranny. Only the 4 cylinder auto is a Ford unit (tranny only).
Why use a lame tranny with a terrible repair history? Read the 626 topic for yourself, there are several stories of trannies slipping and failing early, usually before 80k miles.
It's been refined over the years, but imagine the same tranny in a heavier vehicle with a V6 engine (lots more torque).
-juice
There was a test b/t an M5 (400hp) against an STi WRX. guess who won? It was done in South Africa.
I guess the worlds' fastest sedan ain't that fast after all huh? ;-)
-juice
Randy
Bob
-mike
Stephen
Drew
Stephen :-)
-Leif