Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Subaru Crew - Future Models

1171820222339

Comments

  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    My wife and I were at the Subaru/Mazda on Sat for a couple of minutes and they had a Tribute. We went and sat in it, it seemed roomy. The one thing that my wife really liked was the ability to open just the rear window, rather than the entire rear hatch. She finds opening the rear hatch in my Legacy Wagon to be difficult and would really like it if the Forester had this option. I just thought I would pass it along.
    Frank
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    I didn't know about the rollbar or the reinforced B-pillars. I wonder if this affects the North American models as well:

    http://4wd.sofcom.com/Subaru/Outback.html

    Drew
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Interesting.

    Bob
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Patti- No disrespect to the other Frank but I'm perfectly happy with the way my Forester's rear hatch opens up. Also, I could be wrong, but I think this was addressed a while back and SOA decided that the added cost outweighed in gain in usefulness. Just my .02.

    -Frank P.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I had a '97 rodeo and the lift glass was great for bringing wood home, cause all the garbage in the back section would roll out while driving if I had to open the hatch. Whereas I have doors on my '00 Trooper, anything in the back would fly out if I kept them open.

    It would be a nice thing to do on the forestor to make it more SUV-like and differenctiate it from the Outback.

    Just another opinion.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    The lift glass would be convenient, but not if it's too pricey. They help carry long items, but the roof rack already serves that purpose. So I'm neutral. If it's cheap, do it.

    Anyone else think those Aussue OB's look higher up?

    Bob: I also noticed the tach in the middle. Love it! The Impreza looks better and better up close, it's really growing on me.

    That cabrio looks interesting. It don't think it fits in with Subaru's image, though. AWD, snow, drop-top? Seems out of place.

    Spend the money on getting more models that already exist in the USA. Like the B4 RSK, please! Oh, and keep the pricing at $22k too!

    A lot of those concepts are a bit old now. The Exiga was supposed to preview the 2000 Legacy.

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Man, Edmunds sure has changed their tune on Subaru. Until now, they've been our harshest critics, but the VDC review is just loaded with OOHs and AAHs, you must check it out!

    This paragraph says it all:

    The H6 "transforms the Japanese-built Outback into a real contender among the current crop of quite tasty European-sourced wagons. Besides the Bimmer, there are others the Subie stacks up against quite well. The Audi A4 2.8 Avant, Volkswagen Passat 4Motion, and Volvo V70 XC Cross Country also have all-wheel drive, but like the Bimmer are all down on Wheaties with 190 horsepower. The H6 has catapulted the Outback into the big leagues and this became obvious when we drove it."

    My, oh my. Not only comparing it to the european contingent, but also insulting them! LOL!

    I'm trying to determine if someone at SoA is working under cover for Edmunds... ;)

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    don't forget juice, the roof rack is only rated at like 100lbs. That isn't a whole lot of wood... How expesive could it be to add a second set of hinges and a latch?

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    150 lbs on my Forester, actually. And I think it has more to do with the center of gravity than with the sturdiness of the rack.

    I've carried enough lumber on it for a section of fence I built myself, about 35 feet wide. It's the fence you saw at the back of my car port. Not too shabby.

    Compare the Soob rack to the VW rack side by side. It's embarassing how flimsy the VW rack is!

    Still, the open window would help. Payload is over 1000 lbs on some models.

    -juice
  • barresa11barresa11 Member Posts: 277
    One of the potential problems of having a separate lift glass on the tailgate is the rattling noise that can (doesn't always) develop later on when one goes over rough road. Personally, I'd rather do w/o than to have rattles develop later on. This would be especially noticeable in my 00'OB since it's so quiet otherwise. Just my .02.

    Stephen
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    http://www.new-impreza.com/new_pictures.htm

    May not be the exact North America version, but wow, this car is starting to look sharp.
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    I'm not sure exactly how often I'd use it in practice, but in theory I definitely like the versatility that being able to open the rear window independently of the hatch could offer.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    It's on my Explorer. It's definitely a handy and useful feature.

    Bob
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    or, even better, a power slide-in glass like on 4Runner or on some old station wagons.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    They tend to break over time, the glass is too big to slide down consistently over time. Lift glass all the way :)

    -mike
  • dalelynndalelynn Member Posts: 28
    Has anyone heard when Subaru intends(?) to begin including satellite radio reception in their vehicles? Broadcasting is expected to begin first quarter 01 by Sirius Radio and second quarter by XMSR. I for one can hardly wait for this revolutionary offer to become available. For about $10.00 pr. month you could literally choose a favorite commercial free station and listen to it from coast to coast! How COOL!!! I hear Ford and Chrysler already have extensive plans to include reception capability in their vehicles beginning next year as do quite a number of high end imports. I hope Subaru will make receptors available for retrofit for those of us who purchased their vehicles before the option is available. Anyone have news about this?
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    There are pix of new RAV-4

    New RAV-4 Pix

    Click Next or Prev, to browse through the pix.

    I still prefer the boxier look of the Forester. And the interior of new RAV4 is way too small, IMO. The engine hp on high-end RAV4 will be 148 hp, so it's still underpowered as compared to Forester.
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    that is the question. . . I'll send both sides upstairs and let them scope it out. I believe it was looked at in the past, but who knows. I know that the pre-production Outbacks in '95 had a rear facing third seat but that idea was canned because of safety concerns. Same thing with the moonroof feature on Foresters. They did not offer it originally because FHI really wants to be sure safety will not be compromised with ANYTHING. So, if they haven't tested the lift glass, maybe they will in the near future. But, it would probably be a few model years away. With the Forester and Outback, they really try to have a large section of glass for visibility (small children standing behind the vehicle, etc.), so cost and noise might be an issue. I guess we'll see!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Personally I feel it's a waste of money. If the radio doesn't cost anymore for subaru to put in, fine, but it's a gimick, totally un-necessary. Put in some other features if it's gonna cost SOA $.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Bring back the 3rd seats! Even if it requires some reengineering, I suspect at least some people would pay for it. Like me.

    The new RAV4 looks cute. I liked the old one, but it was small and a bit slow. The new one is only slightly bigger, but dimensions are still quite a bit smaller then the Forester, which is already a little cozy.

    They're still using a 2.0l, though, so torque is way down on the Soob. It's supposed to hit 60 in over 10 seconds, and probably can't tow much.

    Nice try, but still needs to be both bigger and more powerful to enter the big leagues. Toyota has the Highlander coming soon so they probably kept the RAV4 modest to make room for its big brother.

    -juice
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Rear-facing 3rd seat can be troublesome. You'll get kids fighting over who does NOT ride in it. Also, many more people get car-sick when riding in a rear-facing seat as opposed front-facing.

    I'd suggest 3rd front-facing seat, folding into the floor when more cargo space is needed. Hey, if Colt Vista could squeeze 3rd seat in, why cannot Subaru?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I didn't have that problem in my dad's old Custom Cruiser, but I may be the exception...

    Actually, the Vista was very tight. I'm thinking more like the MPV and Odyssey flip-and-fold seats. GM is putting those on its minivans, so why not copy that great idea from the parent company?

    Um, just make sure Fuji engineers the hinges and latches!

    -juice
  • greyfalcongreyfalcon Member Posts: 8
    I have driven a Celica for 11 years now and am sold on its being a 5-star reliable, quality car the likes of which is rare. My mechanic is a performance car specialist (mostly German) and thinks highly of Honda, Toyota and Nissan, but not so well of Subaru. He feels they have lagged in technology behind the others and what he sees in the shop has not impressed him particularly.

    They have carved a niche for themselves. The Legacy Outback was a huge success, and others have done pretty well too. The WRX and STi clearly have charisma and performance. I am still curious what you all think. Is it clever niche marketing or does Subaru provide a really competitive car in terms of technology and reliability?

    One web site has suggested that all 2002 Impreza WRX's are already spoken for. Anyone able to comment on that please?

    Finally, I would love to have a WRX wagon. Has anyone heard plans for that one. It exists in Japan I believe. I seem to remember someone saying it would come in the following year (2003)?
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Your mechanic is entitled to his opinion but by and large Subarus are quite reliable. They have a few well-known issues:

    wheel bearing failures-- repeated failures caused by improper bearing installation.

    air ride suspension on late 80's - early 90's models-- it's neat but it will break and it's expensive when it does

    early 4EAT automatic transmissions-- not so reliable, mostly on the SVX due to the additional load, but much better now

    head gaskets-- older iron block motors blew lots of them.

    Lately they've had no large issues but there have been small production-type issues like any brand would have. (an example, a bad run of oxygen sensors on '00 2.5RS) I personally consider Subaru to be quite reliable and far better engineered and built than domestics for sure. Other Japanese marques... eh, they hold their own.

    -Colin
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    When I bought my first Loyale, everybody was telling me how unreliable Subaru is, and how expensive to fix. My experience proved them wrong.
    Note how many old Subaru wagons are still on the road.

    On the other hand, my husband's Accord'97 was not as reliable as we expected, and performance/safety leaves a lot of room for improvement. My old Loyale is more fun to drive, and of course my new Forester can run circles around the Accord.

    BTW, our mechanic also did not think highly of Subarus. Maybe because he was not working on them (they did not break as much?), and did not get paid?

    Actually, until we bought an Accord, we were under impression that Subaru is some kind of second-rate company, and we expected that Honda will be vastly superior. No such thing. I think much more highly of Subarus now.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Look at it this way, your mechanic goes out of business if you buy a car he's never likely to have to fix.

    No wonder he wants you to avoid Subaru!

    -juice

    PS No unscheduled visits to my poor, broke mechanic (just one recall at the dealership).
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC. CONFIRMS PRODUCTION OF NEW CROSSOVER VEHICLE BASED ON ST-X CONCEPT

    Also today, Subaru-Isuzu Automotive announced that Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd. (FHI), parent CHERRY HILL, N.J. Sept. 7, 2000 -- Subaru of America, Inc. (SOA) today announced plans to build a new crossover vehicle based on the ST-X concept unveiled at the Greater Los Angeles Auto Show earlier this year. The new vehicle will be produced at Subaru-Isuzu Automotive Inc. (SIA) in Lafayette, Ind. beginning in the third quarter of 2002 with annual production scheduled for 24,000 units. This exciting new addition to the Subaru model line will be sold through the Subaru dealer network.

    The new vehicle concept, combines the versatility of the Subaru Outback, with the utility of a pickup -- creating a whole new type of vehicle. Garnering an enthusiastic response from both the media and consumers at several auto shows throughout the U.S., the concept is the ultimate expression of the Subaru brand essence -- fun, freedom, adventure, confidence, and control. Additional information and photos of the ST-X are available in the News section of www.subaru.com.

    "Subaru invented the crossover category with the introduction of Outback -- the World's
    First Sport Utility Wagon," said Subaru Of America, Inc. Chairman, President and CEO, Takao Saito. "Now, Subaru has taken this concept a step further, establishing a new segment to complement the active lifestyle. Based upon the overwhelming response by the public and our dealers to the ST-X, we are confident this new vehicle will form the latest chapter in the Subaru crossover success story."


    - more -



    company of Subaru of America, will build a new Subaru engine assembly plant at SIA in Lafayette, Ind. Construction of the new engine plant will be a multi-step project, which will include an initial capital investment of $36 million for full assembly and partial machining. Fuji Heavy Industries will carefully evaluate the investment at each step, which may culminate in a final estimated capital investment of $167 million. The new engine plant will create up to 255 new jobs.

    Central to the announcement, SIA will assemble horizontally opposed 4-cylinder engines for future Legacy and Outback vehicles built at the Lafayette, Ind. facility. The new engine assembly operation will function as part of SIA's Subaru division, and is scheduled to produce up to 114,000 engines per year.

    "The new projects announced today demonstrate the bright future for SIA and its dedicated workforce of more than 3,000 Hoosiers," said Subaru-Isuzu Automotive President and CEO, Masayoshi Nagano. "The projects will also have a significant positive impact on Indiana's economy, especially in the greater Lafayette area. We thank all of the local, county and state officials for their cooperation and assistance during the site selection process."
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    24k units won't be enough. That's not even half of Forester sales. If they price it close to the current Outback, they'll sell every one they make.

    How 'bout some more H6's or a turbo, made in the good ol' US of A?

    -juice
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    the commitment to the engine plant in Indiana will make room for more U. S. produced 6's and turbo's. I think things will start happening soon, but remember, it is my opinion, nothing I heard here.
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    Pretty good, Patti, you scooped your company's website. Now you have angered the webmasters, and you know how testy those enginerds can be (I am one, so I know!).

    Will the supercharger of the ST-X concept be in the production ST-X?

    You read it here on Edmund's first, folks!

    ..Mike

    ..Mike

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Let's hope Patti's opinions become the mandate. They should!

    -juice
  • stellenstellen Member Posts: 1
    Patti - Lift glass would be nice, but TINTED glass would be super. The interior gets so hot and the UV light fades upolstery and damages surfaces over time. And since Subies are so reliable, we satisfied owners want to keep them a long time. I vote for tinted glass on future Outback wagons. My K9 and I would appreciate it. Stellen
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    I think the new redesign looks pretty nice, but I've always liked the look of the RAV4s (arguably a bit more than my Forester) and they seem to have quite good ground clearance for such a small vehicle, but, geez, they are so dinky inside! I understand the redesign adds a little more interior space, and the RAV4 sure needs it.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Folks, let's be honest. Just as the CRV is a jacked up civic, so the Rav4 is a jacked up Corolla. They are trying to get on the Forester Band Wagon. Oh and the Escape/Tribute is a jacked up contour (cancelled in the same year)

    At least the Forester is not a FWD based vehicle with the AWD added as an afterthought....

    -mike
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    I disagree with the implied comment made with the Rav4. So what if the RAV4 is based on the Corolla? The Forester is a jacked up Impreza, the Outback, a jacked up Legacy, the CRV a jacked up Civic. And the list keeps going. That doesn't mean any of them are horrible vehicles.

    The AWD may have been a stuck on the Rav4, but the Corolla is actually quite a competent small car. I was surprised at the smooth ride, and the quality of the interior when we were shopping for a small car for my g/f (she bought a Cavalier, ouch)

    ash
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    I agree that what passes for "AWD" in some of the cute-utes is deplorable. I also would like to opine that my favorite small car is the Mazda Protege. ;)

    Back to the future models:

    I wonder what powertrain(s) will make it into the ST-X? And what will its name be? Surely Subaru won't have a lineup consisting of the Impreza, Outback, Forester, Legacy, and ST-X.

    -Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I'm guessing the Out-brat will have the H6, for the low end Off-road tourqe.

    Let's hope they put skid plates on it and the dual range transfer case.

    Favorite small car: Nissan Sentra
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Actually, to be fair, Honda and then Subaru tried to jump on the car-based mini-ute wagon after Toyota introduced the RAV4.

    However, the Forester was the only miniute that was designed with AWD from the get-go.

    Yes, the part-time, torque-on-demand, "Real Time" or whatever-you-want-to-call-it AWD systems on some of these vehicles are pretty lame.
  • bluesubiebluesubie Member Posts: 3,497
    Wouldn't that be the OB Sport in 95 or 96? Even more cargo room than a RAV4 with the rear seats folded.

    Dennis
  • soon2bsubeesoon2bsubee Member Posts: 137
    While we are on the subject of future desires, how about more interior color choices beside boring grey...we live in South Florida, and car interiors heat up quickly..it would be nice to have a tan interior with a white Legacy - the whole purpose of getting a white car - to keep things cool..the grey interior just defeats that purpose..and maybe one or two more exciting exterior Legacy choices would be nice (How about bringing back Rio Red or adding Blue Ridge). Come on Subaru, get on the Color bandwagon
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I'll share your desires with our Interior Design specialist! Thanks!
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Dennis,

    Kinda sorta. I'd agree that the OB was one of the earlier hybrid vehicles, but not the first. I believe the RAV4 was introduced in Japan before the OB trim became an option on the Legacy.

    Also the RAV4, CR-V and Forester are technically "mini"utes because they're based on compact car platforms. The OB has traditionally been marketed against larger SUVs like the Explorer.
  • nematodenematode Member Posts: 448
    What have you seen? I'm looking for more.
    1) Edmunds. Very positive. Like the extra ponies and the VDC system. Compare it to the likes of Volvo XC, BMW 3 series wagon, and the Audi Avant 2.8. The only gripe seemed the $32k start MSRP for the VDC.
    2) Car and Driver. Actually it could be Road and Track...I got both new issues this morning and was reading both and had some information overload. The article was on page 100 and about a drive through Maine. It was luke warm. They seemed to like the power increase but were not overly impressed. I found it curious that they compared it more the the new breed of mini-utes more than the power wagons from other companies that Edmudns refered to. In the closing paragraph they mention the Escape gives you much of the same for $6000 less. They did mention the A4 Avant 2.8 but only to say it was much faster to 60mph or something like that.

    I'm still very curious as to who is going to buy the VDC and LL Bean versions. Will it be the people shopping for the Volvo XC, Audi Avant 2.8, BMW, Acura MDX, Infiniti QX4, or other money-ute? In this case the VDC gives you less (name, navigation, HID, 50k warranty) but also costs less ($0-6000) too.
    Or will it be people looking at the regular OB or OB Ltd, VW Passat AWD, Ford Escape/Mazda Tribute, Toyota RAV4 and Highlander, Honda CR-V, Hyundai Santa Fe, Nissan Xterra, Chevrolet Tracker, Pontiac Aztek and probably others. In this case the comparison is weird....I guess it would depend on how you look at it. Its cheap for an upscale vehicle but really expensive in the mini-ute segment. The Ford, Mazda, Nissan, Toyota (Highlander), Hyundai, Pontiac, and Chevy are available with 6cyc engines. The OB will have some things (VDC, reliable, proven AWD) that set it apart but then again its quite a bit more $$$ than many of the mini-utes. Seems like its kinda wallowing in the middle to me. Not really enough to take customers away from the other yuppie wagons but too expensive for people to pony up the extra cash.
    What about the larger but not mammoth-utes? Explorer, Bravada, Envoy, Blazer, Durango and so on. I'm not sure. Priced around the same but they really have more utility. Like cargo, towing, power, and in some cases you can get 0.9% finance too. In this case the OB will probably walk away with the the road manners and MPG title. Since I still dont really know why so many people buy those things and keep buying them when they use 10% of its utility......must be the look. The VDC looks the same as my 2k Ltd. They may get some of these people
  • hardenbrhardenbr Member Posts: 11
    Can't wait to see a pre-production ST-X review in the mags. H6 in a pickup application makes perfect sense for the torque. End of 2002 will be perfect for replacement of my 1995 S10. Two soobs in the driveway! Pricing should be below OB or it will be a hard sell. I believe that existing 4 door PU's are priced below their corresponding SUV siblings. I hope it will slide between the OB and Forester in price ($23K-25K). 3500 lb towing capacity a MUST!

    I do have major concerns about the sliding rear cab "glass", for the same reasons mentioned above regarding sliding glass in the older wagons. i.e. reliability and noise. IMHO and extending bed is more practicle. Regarding concerns over shifting weight too far behind rear axle (as noted in SOA web page), well you shouldn't be racing with the bed loaded anyway, now should you? Finally, what if you need to carry 4 people, AND a sheet of plywood.

    The first hybrid vehicle, HMMM. I seem to recall the AMC Eagle fitting that description years before anything else. Maybe it doesn't count because it predated the whole SUV craze. Just something to think about. I don't get too excited over marketing prose. Some exageration is to be expected. Sort of like a good fishing story.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Have you looked at the ST-X show truck stuff on Subaru's website? I thought the cab / bed extension system is wicked, much more innovative than a bed extension. Why would they bother to design and patent it if they thought a simple clamp-on extension would be just as functional?

    -Colin
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    Nematode...

    As you can probably guess from my previous comments on this topic, I'm in agreement with you about wondering where the high-end Subies are going to get their customers.

    I'm looking forward to when our board posters can start the test-drive feedback. We've got a wide range of Subie fans -- from "true believers" to those of us who are perhaps a little more critical, or even a lot more critical -- and I believe we'll get a good assessment when we put it all together.

    Randy
  • greyfalcongreyfalcon Member Posts: 8
    Sorry to go back to my own topic ;-) The way I see it, all the fender benders I caused were avoidable by better braking or gripping. I figure a couple of thousand extra spent in this area pays for itself. The new Celicas have rave brake reviews (the only weak point on the prior model). That is quality responsiveness.

    My mechanic is also a close friend, so he has no axe to grind. He is a quality nut, and second generation car expert. I am sure Subaru Impreza WRX matches up in quality to the Chevy Cavalier, but does it match a Honda Prelude - which also handles pretty darn well. I had to drop the new Celica from my list as it shrunk its back seat and began to try too hard in the styling department... reminds me of Britney Spears...though last I looked her back seat was just fine.
  • centavocentavo Member Posts: 24
    Hi, I was a former Civic 97 owner. The build quality and reliability of a Honda are on its own league. Superior to maybe every brand. But, as with Toyota, their products lack flavor. The other thing is the sureness of the AWD. I remember when on a highway you found a water spot, the FWD chassis can be scary. Also, if the netx WRX Impreza is the 220 hp plus unit they sell in Europe, no other car south of $35,000 can approach it. And the real WRX (with nominal 280 hp) everywhere cost 35% less than the only competition it has found until now, the BMW M3 and the Audi S4.
  • WMartonWMarton Member Posts: 58
    Nematode asks an interesting question: what is the market for the H6 3.0 VDC (and to a certain extent the L.L. Bean model)? Here's my take: you have basically two types of people, SUV folks and wagon folks and within each category diversity by size preference, price consciousness, styling preferences, desire for luxury components, etc. Obviously the small size SUVs (Ford Escape/Mazda Tribute, Xterra, Highlander, etc.) and behemoths (Explorer, Durango, etc.) fit in the former category, but I think that most people who buy the mini-utes (RAV4, CRV, Forester) are more like the SUV folks (only more concerned about the practicality of their vehicle–higher MPG than SUVs, better ride, safer, can do some of the things that a true SUV can). Then you have wagon folks, who for whatever reason prefer wagons (more car like, nimble, fond remembrances of the wood-paneled 70s wagons of their youth?) and are more reluctant to buy an SUV.

    I think the Outback clearly caters to the wagon people, albeit those folks who have a desire for a wagon "plus"–AWD, towing capacity, etc. So I agree with Nematode that the Outback VDC is a niche vehicle–it doesn't compare favorably with the luxo wagons and is more expensive than run-of-the-mill wagons. In fact, I continue to argue that the VDC has only one natural competitor–the 4mo VW Passat SW (which, with the exception of the transmission, it compares very favorably with). Beyond the 4mo crowd, the most likely buyers of the L.L. Bean and VDC models are current Outback Limited owners or folks already interested in the Outback and Limited. (Brief aside: my wife and I are currently looking at the 5-sp Passat GLX SW and VDC. The choice seems to have come down to whether or not we place a greater value on the superior performance and handling of a German car or the greater functionality of the Outback. One very nice feature available in the Passat that is lacking in the VDC is memory seats; there is a ten inch difference in height between us, so this is a very nice feature.) In any case, what Subaru really needs to do is to get the H6 into the regular Outback and Legacy models so that it has much less expensive six cylinder vehicles to offer to current domestic and "Camcord" owners interested in wagons.

    Bill

    Postscript: My wife, kids and I went to the Subaru Outback Rendevous in Reston, VA yesterday. (The kids loved the rock climbing demonstration!) An L.L. Bean H6 was there and I do have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised. I expected lots of gaudy badging and I cringed at the thought of two-tone leather seats...but I was pretty impressed when I saw it up close...very understated but sharp looking. The engine is quite a beauty; very compact and neatly laid out. The only major things lacking are the aforementioned memory seats and HID lights (I think that these will be available on the Passat in 2001.5). A full size spare and one-touch up-and-down windows all around would be nice also.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Patti

    Here's two new models I hope to see some day at
    Subaru showrooms:



    1. THE RETURN OF THE SVX.

    I know this has been discussed before, but I want
    to add my comments.

    I would like it to based on the Legacy GT platform
    (to keep costs in check), and -- make it a "4-door
    hatchback coupe." That's right, a 4-door hatchback
    coupe, not unlike the 4-door extended cab pickup
    trucks. Saturn, as you know, already has a 3-door
    coupe. Also, making it a hatchback reenforces
    Subaru's image of practical utility.

    The target market for this vehicle, besides the
    "'20-30-somethings," would be the "empty-nesters,"
    who are becoming a large market. Speaking as an
    about to be empty nester, I can tell you for a fact the the old body (mine), doesn't bend or flex like it used to. The added convenience of a 4-door coupe would offer a huge marketing advantage over the competition.

    Obviously, if a 4-door coupe were to appear, it
    couldn't use the frameless glass doors, that Subaru is famous for. The full-frame doors would have to have very strong latches at both the bottom and top of the door frame.

    For power, the vehicle would be offered with both
    the 2.5 H-4, and the 3.0 H-6 - both with 5-speed manual and 5-speed sport-shift automatic transmissions.

    I know there have been some rumors floating around
    in Japan that the SVX, or something like it, may
    be in the works. Let's hope so.



    2. A FULL-FLEDGED SMALL ROADSTER.

    I would love to see a Miata-sized roadster
    developed by Subaru.

    Whereas Mazda used the classic, front-engine Lotus
    Elan for inspiration, I would like to see Subaru
    use the the state-of-the-art, mid-engine (and not-for-highway-use-in-the-USA) Lotus Elise for its inspiration -- especially for its styling.

    Okay, how do you make a mid-engined sports car out
    of the existing front wheel drive-based AWD system?

    Simple. Turn the engine and transmission 90
    degrees, so that it's facing east-west, rather than the current north-south layout. It would be a
    "transverse boxer." The front driveshaft would exit where the current front drive now exits. The same would occur with the rear drive, except that it would exit on the opposite side of the
    transmission.

    The power would come from the WRX Turbo, hooked
    up to the oft-rumored 6-speed transmission. No
    automatic offered.

    How about SOA? No guts, no glory!

    Bob
This discussion has been closed.