Options

Subaru Crew - Future Models II

1370371373375376446

Comments

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Agreed, except just make VDC standard, and NAV a stand-alone option.

    Speaking of GPS, I saw an ad for a new Garmin that links up with MSN and gives you not only traffic info, but also weather and even the latest gas prices for stations in the POI database.

    Now *that* is cool. I see a variance of 6-20 cents per gallon in my area, so even though it seems like very little, over time this would really add up, and the service would pay for itself.

    It's only $50/year, so who's first to try it out and report back?

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    If I get a LGT instead of a 3.0R I may pick that one up Juice!

    -mike
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    I hear PDX Tuning has a turbo mod pkg for the 3.0H6... that'd be quite a ride. Any knowledge of it? Can't find it on their website.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Haven't heard anything about it but I've done the turbo RS thing with a friend. It was nice but way too much of a PITA to use as a daily driver IMHO, especially no warranty...

    -mike
  • tifightertifighter Member Posts: 3,791
    Well, more torque sounds good...

    25 NX 450h+ / 24 Sienna Plat AWD / 23 Civic Type-R / 21 Boxster GTS 4.0

  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    I just gotta wonder who Subaru has as a colorist.

    Harvest Gold or Bronze with Harvest Gold accents?? Yeeeesssshhhhh!!!
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I hope this info is accurate.

    Tribeca now gets a 3.6-liter motor. At 254 hp, it makes only marginally more power (the old one developed 245) but much more torque: 247 lb-ft (up from 215). At the same time, the new motor returns 10 percent better fuel economy and runs on regular fuel instead of premium.

    That's enough to make me wait, sure. Especially the improvement in torque. 15% more torque using 10% less gas that costs 20-30 cents less per gallon? Heck yeah I'll wait for the '08.

    Anything more would just be gravy.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    It sounds like a classic case of a larger (but lazy) engine getting better mileage over a smaller (but frantic) engine.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I was fine with the old engine, you remember my comments. But the extra torque, given the payload I tend to carry, is a big selling point.

    10% better mileage is good, mostly because range is poor when you only have a 16.9 gallon gas tank, and competitors have 20 or more.

    I got 20.4 mpg the week I had it, mostly in the 'burbs and on a trip to the beach. That should mean I can break 22mpg on average, and I'd be thrilled with that. That's only 3mpg less than my Forester manages, and the 1 gallon bigger gas tank means range won't suffer, at least.

    I'd still like to see a 20 gallon tank, no doubt.

    -juice
  • rblnrrblnr Member Posts: 124
    I don't have a big problem w/the current engine either. Maybe a bit slow off the line, but no problems passing whenever I want, and NJ traffic is pretty dense, requiring quickness. Key is to be in sport mode.

    How much acceleration do you really need? I'd certainly take better off-line perf. though, and the greater economy is a huge plus to me.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    We had 4 people and a dog, with only a small amount of cargo, for our trip. Broke 25mpg in many places.

    No complaints at all about a lack of power (or our fuel economy), but maybe if all 7 seats were occupied and we had some luggage, I'd be happy to have those 247 lb-ft. :shades:
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    http://www.caranddriver.com/previews/12424/first-drive-2008-volkswagen-jetta-tdi- - .html

    All 50 state compliant, no BluTech injection 6 speed manual. Gobs of torque, mid 8's 0-60. Has the same diesel particulate converter as the european Mazda 5 diesel.

    2008 is looking good. Can't wait for the first Subie diesel.

    John
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    slow reply, but it's very much a case of the rules being in favor of diesel. Audi dominated ALMS with a gas-powered turbocharged car and now is doing it again with diesel. It's all in the way the rules are laid out.

    apples to apples, obviously diesel is NOT superior to gas engines for racing.

    ~Colin
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    mmm Diesel. Might be going diesel myself. 6.6L though :)

    -mike
  • sweet_subiesweet_subie Member Posts: 1,394
    it is wierd that now 08 Tribeca will yield better mileage & run on regular gas but 08 OB/Legacy GT and H6s need premium and gives less mileage !!!!
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    It's not weird at all. A large easy-working engine will often yield better mileage than a smaller but harder-working engine.

    Bob
  • sweet_subiesweet_subie Member Posts: 1,394
    bob, then why they bother with small hard working engines ?

    i meant it is weird that leg/ob GT/H6 cost thousands less than tribeca but yields less mileage and requires premium gas.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Will it come in a wagon?

    I prefer the Passat wagon. Didn't like the rear end styling on the Golf/Jetta wagon I saw.

    Can't wait to see what Subaru can do with theirs...
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think the 3.0l should be phased out, no question, but the smaller engine may have certain advantages like durability if the cylinder walls are thicker.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Sticking a relatively small engine in a heavy vehicle means that the engine will be working much of the time. Put a larger engine in that same vehicle, the engine will work less hard, thus getting better mileage.

    The 3.0 is fine in the lighter Legacy and Outback, as it's not working that hard most of the time. However, in the much heavier Tribeca, the 3.0 is working hard most of the time, hence the poorer fuel mileage.

    Bob
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    Gearing and tuning comes into play too, at least a little. Just look at the difference gearing did to the F-XT.

    -Brian
  • aaykayaaykay Member Posts: 539
    If they are boring/stroking the same block to develop the additional displacement (leaving everything else as-is), then the lower displacement engine might have the durability advantage.

    But if the larger displacement is from a completely different block, then there may not be any durability issue at all.
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    "leg/ob GT/H6 cost thousands less than tribeca"

    Not when comparing comparable models. Invoice on LL Bean OB w/out Nav is about $1200 less than 5-pass Tribeca Ltd w/o Nav. Tribeca has a $2000 rebate & OB has a $750 rebate - a difference of $1250. You should be able to get either one for the same price. Bumping up to the 7-pass Tribeca Ltd w/o Nav would only be about $700 more.

    Add in any factory-to-dealer incentives, and you might actually be able to get the Tribeca for less than the Outback. Most folks see the prices for loaded Tribecas approaching $40k & think the model's a lot more than Outback.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    True, but I suspect the 3.6 will do a lot less "gear hunting" which is where most of the gas is wasted. In the 3.0 Tribeca, it downshifts at the mere sight of an incline, or any time you accellerate—even if just slightly. That likely won't happen nearly as often with the larger 3.6 engine.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I agree with Jeff here, the Tribeca comes well equipped so you have to compare to the higher-end Outback models, and prices are a wash.

    Unless you prefer something smaller, that makes the Tribeca the better value.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    NYIAS Releases Press Conference Schedule

    America's largest-attended auto show will feature dozens of world and North American new vehicle debuts during its annual Press Preview, April 4th and 5th. Following is the list of events.

    Wednesday, April 4
    7:15 - 9:30 NYIAS / IMPA Keynote Address - Special Events Hall
    9:40 - 10:05 General Motors - Stand, Level 3
    10:10 - 10:35 Audi - Stand, Level 3
    10:40 - 11:05 Ford - Stand, Level 3
    11:10 - 11:30 Volvo - Stand, Level 3
    11:40 - 12:05 Mercedes-Benz - Stand, Level 3
    12:10 - 12:35 Infiniti - Stand, Level 3
    12:35 - 1:10 Nissan North America - Stand, Level 3 (lunch)
    1:20 - 1:45 Jeep - Inner, Roadway
    1:55 - 2:20 Lexus - Special Events Hall
    2:30 - 2:55 Subaru - Stand, Level 1
    3:05 - 3:25 BMW - Stand, Level 3
    3:30 - 3:50 Bentley - Stand, Level 3
    4:00 - 4:35 Hyundai - Galleria, Level 4 (reception)
    4:45 - 5:15 TAXI 07 Centennial Exhibit - Inner Roadway

    Thursday, April 5
    8:30 - 9:30 World Car of the Year Awards - Special Events Hall (breakfast)
    9:40 - 10:05 Subaru - Stand, Level 1
    10:15 - 10:40 Nissan - Stand, Level 3 (hospitality)
    10:45 - 11:05 Maserati - Stand, Level 3
    11:10 - 11:30 Lamborghini - Stand, Level 3
    11:40 - 12:40 Suzuki - Stand, Level 1 (lunch)
    12:45 - 1:10 Kia - Stand, Level 1 (reception)
    1:20 - 1:40 Callaway - Crystal Palace
    1:45 - 2:45 XM Satellite Radio - Crystal Palace

    My guess is that the Tribeca is the first one.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    ...over at nabisco—and one that won't make Frank happy!

    According to some Subie dealer the next Forester will be based on the Tribeca! How much do I trust this info. About zero, but I thought I'd pass it on anyway.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's quite a stretch for the wheelbase. Competitors have grown nearly that much, though.

    Bob - you wanna go to the NY show on a weekday? Public days.

    -juice
  • tifightertifighter Member Posts: 3,791
    When is the best guess for the new Impreza to debut?

    25 NX 450h+ / 24 Sienna Plat AWD / 23 Civic Type-R / 21 Boxster GTS 4.0

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    They schedule 2 press conferences, so that should mean they will have one for the 08 Tribeca refresh, and another for the new Impreza. :)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Yes, a weekday.

    Bob
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    http://www.caranddriver.com/autoshows/12685/2008-subaru-tribeca.html

    I've already noticed Subaru refering to the vehicle in current TV spots as the Tribeca, and not the B9 Tribeca.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    No surprise, I never liked the B9 part. Benign, non-malignant.

    I've been calling it the Tribeca all along.

    I hope the article is corrent, 20/25 mpg with 256hp and 247 lb-ft is sweet!

    April 4th, right? I'm at the edge of my seat. :shades:
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    Got a request to open up a discussion for the 2008 Subaru Impreza, and some pertinent posts from here were moved to the new topic.

    Subaru Impreza WRX

    Please go there to comment about this upcoming model and my apologies for any confusion!
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    April 4th, right? I'm at the edge of the fence

    fixed
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    No, for some reason, we've always capitalized The Fence, like we do for other God-like creations. :D
  • jeffmcjeffmc Member Posts: 1,742
    More HP
    More torque
    10-15% MPG increase
    No premium fuel
    Less gear hunting
    Lighter than the 3.0H6

    Sounds like Subaru engineers have done it right. :shades: I've read Tribeca's HP-to-weight ratio will be better than its non-luxury-brand competitors, so it should move quite nicely. They'll have to turbocharge to beat their more expensive competition, though. If the new design sells, I expect to see it... they'll try to offer excellent value vs the performance luxury brands like they do with Legacy.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not sure if an STI model Tribeca would do well. Seems like they'd sell more Legacy STIs or even Forester STIs.

    Even if they did, I'd want the N/A 3.6l model. This is a family car for me, not a race car. ;)
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    ...and you know waaaay back in late '04/early '05 I bitched about the absurity of a Subaru B9X. Are the Subaru folks really surprised that the B9 designation (and its meaning, or lackthereof) resonated with absolutely NOBODY?

    Overall, very interesting changes to the Tribeca. I can't wait to see how it looks.

    This is a repost of the C/D link, I wanted to provide it again b/c the technical info on the displacement increase is very interesting, and provides insight into some of Subaru's innovative capabilities.... and the limitations/restrictions that the Boxer sometimes imposes.

    http://www.caranddriver.com/autoshows/12685/2008-subaru-tribeca.html

    ~Joe
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    An excerpt:

    came up with a novel way of increasing piston stroke without raising the cylinder deck height. The answer was an asymmetrical connecting-rod design (which looks somewhat like a lamb chop) that permits the piston to travel farther downward into the crankcase and increases the effective stroke from 80mm to 91mm
  • sweet_subiesweet_subie Member Posts: 1,394
    how much is 10% reduction to engine weight ?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Not sure, but I doubt the weight will drop by the time they factor in added equipment.

    I remember what they did with the Forester - I got a first year model, and they kept adding 1-2 more things standard as the years went on, usually without increasing the price.

    For 99 they made cruise standard. In 00 the rear LSD arrived. And so on.

    The 07 Tribeca got memory seats and a better cargo cover. Hopefully they add a few things to the 08s and keep a lid on pricing.

    Anyone else notice Fitzmall just dropped the '07 prices by about a grand? Under $26k for a base model. With the Subaru Bucks I have, I could get one in the high $24s!

    Still, I'm waiting to see the new one. As long as I keep my cars, I want the best vehicle this time, not necessarily the best deal.

    It's hard for a cheapskate like me to admit that, too. :D
  • once_for_allonce_for_all Member Posts: 1,640
    (which looks somewhat like a lamb chop)

    Can't you see it now in the tuner ads---"lamb chope for your subie!! Increase hp and torque by 10%" lol

    John
  • bblachabblacha Member Posts: 160
    Hmm, so where would that put the next Tribeca... A size higher, into Pilot territory where it belongs, I'd hope.

    When is the forester redesign due?
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Next Forester is due for 2009, a year afer the Impreza debuts.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It makes sense for the Forester to be a bit bigger than the Impreza, which is supposed to get the Legacy's wheelbase (or close).

    They're gonna end up with too much overlap again, though.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    As I mentioned, I think the rumor has zero credibility.

    Bob
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,697
    Oooooooooh, so mysterious! What will it be?! The Justy? :D
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
Sign In or Register to comment.