Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Engine Oil - A slippery subject Part 2

1679111271

Comments

  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    I won't get into the same old argument with Mr. Shiftright about real life examples of syn and engine life. But in this case I tend to agree with him- oil is not your problem. You could expect a 3 to 5 percent increase with syn. But probably no more.
  • yurakmyurakm Member Posts: 1,345
    Concerning the gas saving when using synthetic oil in winter:

    With synthetic oil there will be less friction while the engine is still cold. The gas, wasted on the friction, will be saved.

    Though, I believe the amount of gas saved is not significant, at least except with very short trips. With our light Connecticut winter (about +15 to +25F) it takes about 0.5 mile of moderate city traffic for engine to start warming (the needle starts moving), and after 1.5 miles the needle points to the middle mark.

    Did not observe faster engine warm-up after switching to the synthetic oil. Cannot see reason in theory too. Probably just the opposite is true: with lower friction the warming would take a bit longer. Have impression that this is what happened with my car, but the difference is very insignificant, and can be easy explained by other reasons (somewhat more cold winter, tires replaced by other model, etc.)

    When it is really cold, the difference is substantial. I lived in Russia for 45 years, and had observed many times how difficult is to start cars when it is cold. With some cars the starter could not not crank-up the engine at -25C (about -11F), and at -30 to -35C (-20 to -30F) all engines using the natural oil had very serious problem with starting.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I had great luck in my Porsche with synthetic concerning warm up...that car was CRANKY when cold, but with the synthetic it started faster and ran smoother right from the beginning. The difference was quite dramatic actually, and really, the only dramatic thing I ever noticed about using synthetic....still, as I told you, I did lose an engine that was running synthetic, but I certainly don't blame the oil or think its fate would have been any different with regular oil.

    Measuring the effect on engine life in the real world is very very difficult, as so few people keep their cars for 200K in America.
  • bblahabblaha Member Posts: 329
    I'll be completing my doctorate in mechanical engineering in a few months.

    Therefore, as a soon-to-be duly licensed member of the research community, I'd like to offer my services in performing a long term study on the performance differences between synthetic and non-synthetic oils.

    The members of this forum will need to provide me with 8 new BMW 325is. I will provid the oil and filters and pay for the analyses.

    Here is how the project vehicles will be used (2 vehicles used in each group, 1 synthetic, 1 non-synthetic:

    1) Baseline 325i: Oil changes every 3k miles.
    2) 7500 mile service
    3) 15000 mile service
    4) Oil analysis recomendation - An oil analyses will be performed every 3000 miles. Oil will be changed only when the analysis for the synthetic oil recommends doing so. Analysis of the non-synthetic oil will be for comparison purposes only.

    At the end of the project (150,000 miles on each car, approximately 10 years from now) the engines will be broken down and numerous dimension measurements will be taken.

    Since 1.2 million miles can take a single driver a long time, I will likely enlist the aid of my wife and a few close friends. Not to worry, I will meticulously monitor total miles driven so that each vehicle receives (on average) identical abuse.

    The sooner this forum provides me with the vehicles, the sooner I can begin!

    :-)
  • iusecadiusecad Member Posts: 287
    just 325's? I myself would prefer MB S600's...

    oh well, thanks for your input... oil (brand) is the only thing I haven't tried changing to see some improvement in mileage. Even a slight 2mpg improvement would've been fine by me...
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I sincerely doubt you'd get 2 mpg over any stretch of time ormeasurement. Why do I think that? Because if it were true that all cars would automatically get 2 mpg increase, every manufacturer would switch to synthetic oil tomorrow morning at 9 am. That would be a gigantic jump in fleet fuel mileage for an automaker at hundreds of millions of dollars less cost than they are now spending to improve fuel mileage inorder to meet government mandates and edge out the competition.

    I don't believe that factory engineers are this stupid.
  • steve234steve234 Member Posts: 460
    If the manufacturers thought they would help their CAFE, we would all be on synthetics in a heartbeat. In the other forum, they are calling the switch to 5w20 as a plot to improve CAFE. If this was the case, it would apply to the switch to synthetic. I seriously doubt that any manufacturer would have a problem with the cost (to customers) of oil changes going up.
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    Switching to 5W30 saves gas and wears out engings allowing more cars to be sold. Using syn makes engines last longer- hence selling fewer (fewer) new cars. This counterbanances the effect of getting more milage from the syn. Comprende??
  • bblahabblaha Member Posts: 329
    iusecad:
    I didn't want to seem demanding. Besides, my wife likes the idea of a 3 series.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    No, sorry, I don't "get it".

    What's with all these conspiracy theories anyway? Automakers have spent gazillions of dollars to make their cars last longer...this is why people buy more Toyotas and BMWs than Oldsmobiles.

    Do you really think an automaker would a) deliberately encourage you to do something to blow up your (their) engine, thereby ruining their own company's reputation? Do you think this would REALLY sell more cars?

    Further, do you really think an automaker would turn down a way to increase their fleet gas mileage by a full 10% (2-3 mpg claims for synthetic oil is what one sees now and then), in order to save $1 a car?

    And even more, do you really think automakers are not putting synthetic oil in all their cars so that oil companies can sell more oil to us? And so how does the oil company pay back the automaker for sacrificing fuel mileage and longevity? And if they DO pay back the automakers in this conspiracy, how do they make money selling us more oil and filters?

    I believe the answer is really much more simple...the oil the factory puts in your car does a great job just as it is, and synthetics' advantages barely, if at all, offset the expense of installing it...presuming we are talking about ordinary passenger cars on ordinary roads being driven by ordinary drivers.

    If you operate a railway, or heavy trucking, or you are a NASCAR driver, we can start a different discussion about the pros and cons of oils.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    I thought you were saying that the "racing teams" don't use synthetics in their cars.
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    I know you don't get it. BTW I meant to say switching to 5W20 instead of 5W30 My bad. But anyway. Syn saves gas. Syn extends engine life. I have proved this in real world examples. Which I think is what you like- I think. Reread my post- again I said nothing about a conspiracy. Another fact: a 20 weight has less friction than a 30 weight oil. It will not however protect as well. This has been documented by many ASTM four-ball tests. Yea what about the NASCAR gig like vadp mentioned??
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    Sorry, given corporate and stockholder greed I honestly do believe that some bureaucrat at a manufacturer says hey, we can make our engines go 100,000 miles easily, improve mileage by going to a 5W20 weight oil and guess what, since most people don't care about going beyond a 100,000 miles, actually sell more cars in the long run via increased engine wear at 120,000 miles. Yea, I believe this can occur and probably has. You've seen all the court battles over why a manufacturer did not use a 2 cent bolt, well, over a million cars it adds up to profit and that is all they care about! So, let's not be naive here, I''ve been around too long to trust the bean counters and their supervisors!!! If they thnik they can get away with it they will try it!!!
  • iusecadiusecad Member Posts: 287
    I meant switching from GM Goodwrench oil (made by who?) to a name brand like Valvoline. I just mentioned using a blend for a couple of changes to clean out the crud that's in there now...
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    Don't use the blend....there's only 10% of syn +ripoff. Make your own. Armtdm, your going to get Shiftright started again. I totally agree with you. Look at the spece shuttle that blew up because the corporate Thyocol (maker of o-rings)suits over-ruled engineers. That could never happen in the real world? Right. I'm also older (55). I know better.
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    My Amsoil jobber informed me that their home office has stated that they plan to release a 5W20 weight synthetic oil in about two months.
  • hengheng Member Posts: 411
    3 NYC taxi cabs, all owned by my father in-law, all run with dino oil, all had no engine failures.
    1. Checker, chevy in-line 6, ~500,000 miles , done in by a bus.
    2. Chevy impala cab, 4.3 V-6, ~375,000 miles, done in by a bad computer.
    3. Chevy impala cab, 4.6(?) V-8, ~200,000 miles, done in by retirement
  • iusecadiusecad Member Posts: 287
    so do you use Amsoil? I just looked on their web site (hey, they're local!) and I gotta say $5.70 a quart and $10 a filter is quite a shock, but I read on one of their pages that you can go 12.5k between changes. Is that right? (they also make a claim that you might see an increase in mpg) so now I'm thinking, if I were to give them a try, would I see a difference after one oil change? you know, if it was going to improve my mpg...
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I never said racing teams don't use synthetics...please don't put words in my mouth...whoa!
    What I said was that not all racing teams use synthetic, and that some very fast cars go a very long way on regular oil on a race track. What I meant to imply is that synthetic oil is not a given in racing....it's the team's choice and some choose it and some don't.

    I'm still gonna check with my friend who races SERIOUS GT classes...I'll let you know what he uses...
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    I apologize. I broke my own rule by not reading post correctly. heng...if I were you I would keeep using that oil. I won't because to me it's just information that I can't verify. Perhaps if He would have used Mobil 1 they would still be running. 1,000,000 miles for a Mercedes- engine in good condition at the end.

    Later,
    Al
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    Well, the price you were looking at is full retail. As a preferred cutsomer $15/year or a dealer at $20/year the price/quart comes down to $4.35 and the filters around $5-$7 depending. Less expensive then Mobil 1 filters at Autozone. Although I use Amsoil exclusively in engines and trannies (I use RedLine gear oil in manuals) their claims as slightly exaggerated. I have gone 15,000 between changes but my oil analysis over 9 years indicates that about 12,000 miles between changes is the best for me as too much dirt enters the oil around that point and I don't use by pass filters etc. On two cars I change once a year with a filter at 6 months but they only put on 8,000-12,000 miles a year. I am lucky, my supplier carries a huge inventory and I can walk in and purchase. To order by mail is a pain and I would probably use Mobil 1 if I had to do that. Plus, shipping cost greatly adds to the total price.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    I still wonder what "racing teams" choose not to use synthetics.
    I really wanna know.
    Thanks.
  • turbotcturbotc Member Posts: 163
    If you must know, the Tour de france teams do not use synthetics. None of those guys does. I know that for a fact.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    Good for you.
    But the question wasn't directed towards you, if you noticed.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    And since you know that for a fact WHAT oils do the "tour de france teams" use?
    Thanks.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Probably 3 in 1 oil!
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    Probably this one:


    http://www.rocklube.com/oil.htm


    Looks high performance to me.

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Okay! I talked to my friend who just raced WSC class at Daytona (World Sportscar--a prototype class) and his team uses synthetic---but only Redline oils, for both engine and especially for gearsets (get this--ONE CV joint costs $9,000!!).

    Anyway, that's a serious class of race car and he says most of the teams he knows in that class of racing use Redline....seems to be the hot stuff that most teams are using in his particular specialty of racing. Sometimes they'll use what a sponsor gives them, too.

    On a less positive note, his engine blew up. Diagnostic guess was that an air pocket in the cooling system overheated the motor. Racing is not called the "cruel sport" for nothing.

    My other buddy races SCCA and doesn't use synthetic, but he doesn't go 200 mph either, although he'd like to. He tends to "save" his car and hope the hotdogs blow up...sometimes he wins that way.
  • turbotcturbotc Member Posts: 163
    gimme me a break. can't take a joke can you? tour de france is a bicycle race in case you don't know. duh. talking about no sense of humor.
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    the loosers are not using syn...but then again how would we know who they are???... The're loosers. BTW another real life example, speaking of racers. The winning car engine of 1993 Indy 500 was torn down and inspected. Mimimal wear; it was judged that it easily could have gone another 500 miles. Source SAE publication "951926" Mobile engineer's assessment of the product in the vehicle- Mobil 1 (synthetic) of course.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    In case I don't know?
    LOL
    BTW, gooooood joke. image
  • turbotcturbotc Member Posts: 163
    oh yeah. I am so sorry i forgot. you a god since you know EVERYTHING. Please stand still so I can bow.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    I just used synthetic on my bicycle chain and peddled over 1,000,000 miles today! I'm convinced!
  • iusecadiusecad Member Posts: 287
    how does the oil look in your cars (that only get 8k-12k a year) after 6 months when you change filters? is it turning dark yet? what's a bypass filter? oh, and uhmm, did you see any improvement in mileage?
  • hengheng Member Posts: 411
    Well you didn't read my post correctly either.
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    I appologized to Mr. Shiftright.
    heng: as to your post I said:. "heng...if I were you I would keeep using that oil. I won't because to me it's just information that I can't verify. Perhaps if He would have used Mobil 1 they would still be running. 1,000,000 miles for a Mercedes- engine in good condition at the end."

    Where's the documentation???? what am I missing.???

    Later,Al
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    Sorry, forgot to reply to all of your questions. No, I don't think that I saw any change in the mpg. As to the color. At about 7,500 miles mine begins to turn dark. I check my oil in the morning before starting so that I get a consistent reading and when cold all oils will be darker in color. Even a 7,500 miles though when hot it is still transparent enough to see through though darker then at 3,000. But as someone pointed out, dark does not mean that it is not still good and doing its job. really no change in color after changing the filter. Most wear and other particles that color the oil are too small for filters to catch so they remain even after the filter change. You do dilute the remaining oil slightly with the new filter and new oil with it but not really noticeable. I too was as skeptical and fearful of engine damage when starting with synthetics and that is why I went gradually and did the oil analysis. But after 9 years I am very comfortable with extended drains.
  • iusecadiusecad Member Posts: 287
    thanks

    I guess I wouldn't be too worried about going 12k between changes, as far as the motor goes, but I feel better when someone's been under there looking things over a little more often than once a year... and I hate doing my own maintenance... it's just too dang cold...
  • brorjacebrorjace Member Posts: 588
    I use synthetics in my '95 Honda Civic DX. These have been mostly Mobil 1 and Valvoline which are both 100% PAO-based synthetics. I use to use Castrol Syntec as well but stopped when I found it was actually highly refined (hydroisomerized/hydrocracked) petroleum oil which costs about half as much to produce.


    I also won't use Amsoil because of their shady past and multi-level-marketing. It's probably OK stuff, however, as it is PAO-based, but there are other brands out there I trust more.


    This summer I'm going to try Redline 10W30 in my car.


    I feel very comfortable saying I get about 1-2% more gas mileage with synthetic oil in my crankcase. I get between 43-45mpg in the summer with my wide, performance tires on my car. 39-42mpg in the winter.


    What really opened my eyes to the difference synthetics make is putting synthetic oil in a pull-start lawnmower. I couldn't believe how much easier the thing was to pull start ... which was half the battle in getting the grass mowed. >:^)


    I also use Redline MTL in my manual transmission. This stuff is just incredible ... especially if you live where it gets really cold.


    I use somewhat extended drain intervals of 5-6,000 miles between oil& filter changes.


    Oh, and on Hondas, you should always use the OEM filters. They are the best made, have the most filtration area and can be bought for $4 each at many online places. Take a peek:


    http://www.tech2tech.net/library/oilfiltr.htm


    --- Bror Jace

  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Thank you Bror...that was an interesting post with some believable numbers.

    I think Redline products are great, too, and I've had good luck in MOST, but not all, gearboxes. It doesn't always improve shifting, etc., and might actually make it worse on certain cars...so don't expect miracles. Also kind of expensive. It helped shifting in my Porsche but really messed up the shifts on my Alfa...go figure....and didn't notice anything one way or the other on my Isuzu Trooper. I'm going to try some in the differential of my diesel Mercedes, which had some debris in it that I didn't like the looks of.

    Again, I think your lawnmower proves that the 1%-2% improvement you might see in fuel mileage with synthetic oil relates mostly to faster warm-ups on a cold engine. I don't see frictional loses with a high-revving warm engine being very different between regular multi-weight or synthetic oil.
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    Out of curiosity what is the shady past of Amsoil? If you do not wish to post to his board my e-mail is armtdm@monuental.com

    I like RedLine MT90 in my 6 spd manual but use Amsoil for all other cars (5 in all on syntheitc oil, trans fuid etc.) I have found it to be great over the 9 years I have used it but would probably use Mobi 1 if I did not have quick access. Agree A.J. appears sleazy! I also feel they would do much better in regular retail outlets. I also use the cheapest synthetic I can find for my lawn mower etc. and I agree, a big difference. Mostly Havoline is the cheapest I can find at $2.99/quart. I do not think that switching brands is a great idea but offer no scientific reason as to why. I have stuck with Amsoil the whole time. Not sure about Honda filters but my oil analysis changed significantly when I switched from Toyota OEM oil filters to Amsoil filters.
  • vadpvadp Member Posts: 1,025
    "Oh, and on Hondas, you should always use the OEM filters. They are the best
    made, have the most filtration area and can be bought for $4 each."

    Sorry, the link didn't work for me.
    I don't think that Honda makes its own oil filters. Probably they're just rebadged ones, made by
    Champion Labs or some other big filter manufacturer.
    If it's true, the filter won't differ from any other filter brand produced by that manufacturer.
  • brorjacebrorjace Member Posts: 588
    Nigel_Shiftright, The coefficient of friction is lower for some synthetics, depending, depending ... which is why I think they offer a teensy bit better mileage, power, etc ...
    Redline compares its (and other) synthetic oils on its site to some conventional oils in this respect. There was a Mustang magazine that tried Redline 10W30 vs a 10W30 conventonal oil in a 5.0 Mustang on a dyno. The synthetic gave a few more horsepower through the first 2/3 of the rev range but as things approached 6,000 rpms, the dino oil showed a bit more power. I think this is because the multi-vis oils begin to thin out under these severe conditions. This would rob less power as compared to a more stable fluid (like the Redline oil).

    armtdm, I got my information on Amsoil from an australian oil wholesaler that had a basic "History of Synthetics" section on their site. Unfortunately, the link doesn't work but supposedly Amsoil's initial formula (pre-PAO) was something that was credited with damaging numerous engines and Amsoil blamed the owners for not properly 'prepping' their engines so they switched to a Mobil 1-like PAO formula. I've also talked to one guy (self described racer/enthusiast) that had supposedly followed up on Amsoils testimonials to find that they weren't as Amsoil described them. Also, we all look at their claims of greatly extended change intervals, vast increases in mileage, etc ... So, while I don't find them terribly credible, I don't think the oil the sell is BAD, just over-hyped and (probably) over-priced.

    I'm not familiar with Toyota OEM filters, sorry.

    vadp, you are correct. All of the Honda filters I've seen are made by Filtech which is a company somewhere here in the U.S. I hear Fram also makes filters for Honda (but to Honda's notoriously strict standards) but I have not seen them. I hear these Fram filters are more common in Canada. I checked that link and it just worked for me.

    --- Bror Jace
  • armtdmarmtdm Member Posts: 2,057
    Although most filters are made by only a handful of companies (Baldwin being one also) they are all made to different specs. DO NOT Assume that just because Champion makes Honda that all Champions are as good. DEFINITELY not true! The filter media is different as are the components. I believe Chanpion makes Mobil 1 as well but a truly fine filter with totally different components.

    Yea, I have heard those early stories of Amosil, probably true. Their claims are a little too much to digest however, I will say this. Based on my personal experience a great oil and filter. I go extended drains but not as far as they claim I can. Second, when Mobil 1 was first introduced many years ago they claimed 25,000 miles between changes. They subsequently backed off (although I feel they could still claim that) well, they simply stopped advertising that. I think they backed off due to pressure from the auto manufacturers who needed the service business and from their own dino side of the business that saw huge sales declines if 25,000 caught on. So, I am not so pleased with a company that backs off due to pressure from other industries or its' own profits.( they never said it could not go 25,000 when they ceased to advertise that. They just stopped advertising it). Amsoil at least has the ***** to say 25,000 miles and has not backed off on that over the years. RedLine also makes extended drain claims.
  • yurakmyurakm Member Posts: 1,345
    Amsoil increased recently the recommended run between oil changes to 35k miles with the best (and more expensive) of its oils. They still require to change oil every 12 months, and to change their filters every 12.5k miles / 6 months.

    Do you drive more than 25k miles per year, though, to say nothing about 35k? Of my friends very few do. Couple of them are commuting 50-60 miles in one direction. The third lives on his company premises, zero commute, but he is a manager of a small track fleet.

    Looks as the above recommendations are mostly for road warriors: salesman etc.
  • Mr_ShiftrightMr_Shiftright Member Posts: 64,481
    Well, if you really want to get logical about it, since the average car on the road is about 7-8 years old, and if the average person drives at most 12K-15K miles per year, there is statistically no reason to worry about extra-high miles on any car. Most cars could made 120,000 miles easily these days with just off the shelf regular oil. So really, with these statistics in mind, the special oils and filters are either designed for high-mileage fleet service or for those of us who don't want to change oil quite so frequently (like my diesel Mercedes, it's a real pain and a mess to change the oil).
  • steve234steve234 Member Posts: 460
    Everyone has to make their own decision about which oil is good for them. I personally have decided to go wih synthetic on my new truck, but after 115k miles, I have no intention of switching my wife's car over. There are many reason for and against synthetics. so it is not clearcut. It is amazing how many people think that everything is a conspiracy. There is poor business decisions, poor engineering, etc. Add to the mix social change, fate and world politics. We are lucky if 40% of the decision we make are the correct ones (basic business managment statistics). It is no wonder that there are no perfect vehicles. The biggest headache is the so called experts that push a theory based on the "I'm an (engineer, salesman, marketer, mechanic, etc)" line of reasoning. Even the best petroleum engineers have different takes on the subject.
  • adc100adc100 Member Posts: 1,521
    For some mysterious reason you keep forgetting about one of the most important reasons for using syn; YOU DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE AS OFTEN.
  • yurakmyurakm Member Posts: 1,345
    You wrote: one of the most important reasons for using syn; YOU DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE AS OFTEN.

    while Mr. Shiftright wrote: for those of us who don't want to change oil quite so frequently
  • spectre3spectre3 Member Posts: 67
    that would put me in your top 1%...

    i commute 2120 miles minimum every 4 weeks to work,
    all interstate driving 72-75 miles per hour when its safe to do so...
    i have no desire to crawl under my escort every 5 or 6 weeks to change my dino oil, so i use a synthetic. i have extended my drain interval to 6k from 5k after reading the good comments here and on the synthetic oil thread.
    i could probably go longer between changes but the 6k interval seems to be working well for me.
    and yes, i also use the mobil 1 filter, for my peace of mind.

    my 2cents,

    take care all,

    lee
Sign In or Register to comment.