Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Best Vehicles for Tall and/or Large Drivers

1356719

Comments

  • rcoynercoyne Member Posts: 1
    I am 6'3'', 33 inseam. Leg and head room is an issue for me too. I will probably but a Chrysler Concorde which is excellent as far as roominess is concerned, if you put the steering wheel in the highest position.
    I've never really been able to buy my "dream car" because of the size issue. I've sat in the Prelude, Eclipse, Mitsu 3000GT, Firebird, and Sebring -all too small. Steering wheels tend to touch lap. The only sporty car that was even close was a Camaro - but still slightly too small. The Miata was a joke. I think it would be cramped for just about anyone.
    Surprisingly the Grand Am is very good in terms of room - I drive one now.
    Anyone know of a car that looks small and sporty on the outside, but deceptively roomy within?
  • rea98drea98d Member Posts: 982
    I just got a 95 Ford T-bird, and being 6' tall, the car has plenty of head and leg room, so long as your not religated to sitting in the back seat. Two days after I got the car, I took her on a 300 mile trip, and even after 5 hours, my bottom wasn't sore. I'd definately reccomend a car like this to someone else. Unfortunately, they're resigned to the used car market, as Ford killed the T-bird.
  • yllibyllib Member Posts: 8
    I am 6'3 and I drive a 94 Eclipse and have no problems with leg room. In fact, I borrowed my parents Camry to take a trip over the 4th of July and found that less comfortable on the long drive.
  • bvolkbvolk Member Posts: 5
    Woaa' Wish I would have found this list two days ago. AT 6'4" 250 lbs, I had major problems in buying my car of choice. I really wanted an Accord or Camray. The headroom was OK - no moonroof on anything - legroom marginal, but the thing that bugged me was the small seat - especially for thigh support. I tried an Avalon - liked everything about it but the seat is only a tiny bit bigger than the others. The Accord brags that its seat design is based on airplane seat ergonomics for comfort - that is an oxymoron if I ever heard one.

    The one intermediate size car that really surprised me was the Olds Intrigue - the seat was really larger and comfortable. I did not care for the styling soo went looking - what I found will make many of you chortle.

    I had heard the 2000 LeSabre's were a greatly improved car and they were right. With the power seats, I really could get comfortable. The fresh look and the features - lights under hood and air shocks for hood, very high trunk lid lift position - bloody heads will be a thing of the past, and so on, I decided on this car and ordered one. I wish I had tried the Saab, although dealers are not that easy to find in small cities. I think several of the other Euoropean cars should have been tried as well. I had no doubt the Crown Vistoria and new Impala would work as well.
  • breez3breez3 Member Posts: 1
    I'm 6'5" tall - fit great in the Mercedes E320 - including sunroof. Also fit great in Saab 9-5 (with sunroof)and in the Toyota Avalon (without sunroof). Plenty of leg room in all three. I read the specs on Edmunds data sheets. They were not accurate for me. I also looked at Consumers Reports 1999 Car and Truck Review and got a different perspective ( more appropriate). Good luck.
  • mjohns7861mjohns7861 Member Posts: 41
    Been struggling in my search for a new car. I loved the Chevy Malibu I test drove but have serious concerns about it's reliability. Thus my interest in the Accord. I test drove a '97 DX base model and found the leg room just about adequate but found the narrow hard seat barely tolerable. I understand the '98's saw a complete redesign - can anyone vouch that they are any roomier or more comfortable for a tall person?

    Magnus
    6'6"
  • james24james24 Member Posts: 17
    I dont think so. I am 6'-5" and can barely squeeze into the new accord. Didnt even bother to test drive it. I do fit in the civic however.
    I would suggest you go try the car i have now. It is the new passat. It is the best seating position I have ever had in a car. And after 14000 miles, it has been flawless. Not a single problem other than 1 recall for a fuel line filter and the stereo. It is just as tight today as when i got it. a must look at.
  • ohiogoodguysohiogoodguys Member Posts: 19
    I am approximately 6'2" and have been looking at the accord. In the showroom of Park Honda they had a 97' 2 door special edition. it did not feel as comfortable as the 1998+ model. I would look at the accord. I also would take a look at the pontiac grand prix. ((1997+ GP's))same style I have a 1997 GRAND AM 2 door and its fine. The grand prix is awsome for leg room. I put the seat all the way back and it was toooo far. Also bonneville. all 3 good choices.
  • mjohns7861mjohns7861 Member Posts: 41
    Anyone ever drive a Izuzu Rodeo? I am 6'6" with a '36 inseam. Am thinking I can pick up a late model Rodeo at a pretty reasonable price.

    Magnus
  • james24james24 Member Posts: 17
    Took the Rodeo for an extended test drive last year before deciding to get something else. I liked the truck alot. I'm 6'-5" with a 36" inseam and fit nice in the Rodeo, even with the sunroof. I would suggest it for your size. Almost all trucks provide a good driving position for me due the raised seating positions.

    good luck in your search.
  • goldsmithgoldsmith Member Posts: 2
    I'm 6'7" and I feel your pain. It's difficult with most sedans, I recently rented a Maxima and while it had a lot of power and handled well, the driving postion was very cramped. Also, if you're ever in one, watch out for the parking brake handle when it's engaged, your right knee will get banged. My family vehicle is a minivan, and I find the Chrysler/Dodge vans to have excellent room on both the driver's side and passenger side. Good luck on your search.
  • sarathyjsarathyj Member Posts: 3
    I fully agree with you. I bought a maxima (well I'm just 5'11") and I find that the steering wheel hits my knees even if it's all the way up and the seat all the way down. Get cramps on my legs on long drives. Also thigh support in also inportant on long drives. Helps if I pull the seat back enough but that would make the steering wheel a bit farther for the hands and would pain my neck. If only it had telescope.....
  • sarathyjsarathyj Member Posts: 3
    Will it be possible to add/modify telescopic steering aftermarket?
  • hayneldanhayneldan Member Posts: 657
    I too am 6'4" and find leg and headroom a problem. Japaneese cars design the tilt wheel to go down but not adjust up enough for me. I cant drive many japaneese rental cars because of the steering wheel. I can't get my foot off the gas and onto the brakes without hitting the steering wheel with my knee. I went shopping for a new car this year and ended up comparing a Intrigue withh a Intrepid the Intrigue was nice but IMHO was about a size 44 where the Intrepid was a 46XLT (extra large tall). The Intrepid also had about Two more inches of rear seat legroom with the drivers seat all the way back and a larger trunk. I bought the Intrepid. Its worth a look for tall people.
  • cadillac1cadillac1 Member Posts: 51
    If you want a sedan with great interior space then only look at american. Japanese cars are made smaller. I mean they call an Avalon full size but it looks and is small compared to a grand marquis or buick lesabre. German made cars are to expensive if you want a large vehicle. So look at some american made cars.
  • raluckraluck Member Posts: 1
    I'm 6'1'' and just drove the Intrigue on a 200 mile trip. I loved it. The leg room was excellent, my knees were not hitting the steering wheel, and I did not have to stretch to reach the steering wheel. I've driven the Toyota Camry for more than 10 years. The Camry is the only Japanese Car that is marginal for us long leg people. I love Japanese cars for the reliability but the leg room and steering wheel positions don't suite long leg people.

    Does anyone know how reliable Oldmobile vehicles are?
  • gary97cavgary97cav Member Posts: 1
    I am 6'2 and drive a 97 Chevy Cavalier LS Sedan. It has PLENTY of head room and adequate leg room. I would recommend it to any other tall person.
  • drivingdriving Member Posts: 1
    Has anyone checked out Volvos, in particular the S40? I'm wondering if the Volvos have adequate leg room???
  • jkhsnsjkhsns Member Posts: 1
    I'm purchasing a '99 Hyundai Elantra, and at 6' 6" and 320 pounds, I find the legroom and headroom adequate. Hip-room is also pretty generous. For the price, it has more room than anything else I looked at or researched.
  • nikkinikki Member Posts: 5
    The Mazda Protege is awfully roomy. It gives a lot of space for the tall and hippy people. I never get a cramped knee after driving for hours. Unlike civic, saturn, neon, mirage, or avenger, the protege felt great and I even had extra foot room (5'9 woman with big butt & hips)
  • mjohns7861mjohns7861 Member Posts: 41
    While not exactly a sedan can someone recommend the Cherokee for someone who is 6'6" like me? I seem to recall I have been a passenger in one before and seem a little tight.

    Magnus
  • nikkinikki Member Posts: 5
    The Protege even has a height adjustable seat belt.
  • omonaijaomonaija Member Posts: 3
    I have always lusted after a BMW 528i. I am 6' 3" with a 34" inseam. Has anyone driven this wonderful vehicle with a stick? I am deciding between getting a stick and an auto.
  • pristinacrawfopristinacrawfo Member Posts: 5
    The latest reviews for the 2000 Saturn S-series cars say the front seat slides back farther on its track. This was my only qualm about Saturn. Protege has plenty of room for me (6-foot-4, 230 pounds), but I don't like the weak rear bumper.
  • dkatlantadkatlanta Member Posts: 23
    mrnaija,
    The 528 is indeed a wonderfu vehicle but, at 6' 3", you should make certain you fit comfortably in the driver's seat. The problem is that the seat is programmed to adjust along a defined arc: As the seat moves up, it will also move forward. You may have trouble finding a good driving position. I've only driven the 528 for a few days at a time, so I don't know what it's like to live with it, but I own a 3-series with the same restrictions on seat movement and, at 6' 1", have found this to be a real problem. The 5 series has a tilt/telescoping steering wheel, which may help, but you still may find the pedals too close for comfort.

    I think the 528 has sufficient power with the automatic, and the 5-speed still doesn't turn it into a 540. Others feel the automatic transmission saps too much power. Unlike the new 328, the 528 still uses a 4-speed automatic, but I think the gear ratios are nicely chosen.
  • omonaijaomonaija Member Posts: 3
    Thanks dkatlanta.

    I test drove a 528i auto just once (enough punishment for me)and while I loved the way the cockpit wrapped around me and all that all I could wonder were two things:

    1. How much more fun would a manual be?

    2. How cramped would my legs (34") feel if I had
    to change gears on a regular basis?

    I guess I should probably just go and test drive the manual and find out. I was also wondering if anyone had driven the 528i Sport. Is there any real difference? I live in an area with long winters (YEP, SNOW!!!!) and sometimes hellish traffic. Is your 3-series a manual, and if so how cramped do your legs feel after time in traffic?
  • dkatlantadkatlanta Member Posts: 23
    mrnaija,

    My 3 series is an automatic. I don't think a manual would feel more cramped, though. With an automatic, your left foot sits on the dead pedal, while with a clutch you get a chance to stretch it forward every time you press in the clutch. My last car was a Porsche 944 and my left leg didn't feel cramped until I got the 3-series.

    To me, the 528 is much more of a luxury car than the 3: heavier, quieter, not quite as nimble. A manual transmission in the 3 series is a blast, but I think less so in the 5, at least the 528.

    The sport package in the 5 stiffens the ride slightly. You get wider tires, so there's also quicker steering response and perhaps a slight decrease in on-center feel.

    If long winters are an issue, you might have a look at an Audi A-6 quattro, too.
  • berdmanberdman Member Posts: 1
    I know its not a BMW 528, but an Audi A4 2.8 may well be worth looking at. I own a 1999 A4 2.8, I'm 6'2" with a 34" inseam, and I fit fine in the driver's seat, though I use up all of the adjustment. I admit, I've not driven a BMW, but the A4 is so much fun, I think it would be worth a test drive anyway. A previous post mentioned the A6, which I'm sure is a fine car, but I don't think it's supplied with a manual transmission. The A4 is available with the Quattro system, and I've done a little winter driving with it, and liked it.
  • omonaijaomonaija Member Posts: 3
    I love the way the A4 looks but I always thought it would be too small. I'll have to check it out. I just helped my sister buy a Honda Accord by the way and that had lots of room for me. Paid $23300 for a 2000 EX V6 (with destination). Seemed like a pretty good deal. Back to the 528, I just found out it has the same interior dimensions as a Honda Civic! And a smaller trunk! I'm going to do some serious test driving soon. The A6 has a nice interior, but I just cant seem to fall in love with the exterior. Some days (and in some colors) it looks great. At other times....blah! When I finally get some time I'll definitely drive the A4.
  • gparegpare Member Posts: 1
    I'm 6'3" and drive a '96 Lincoln Continental...It has great legroom that is sufficient in both the front and back..even with the seat nearly all the way back I can sit in the back or front comfortably. It also has standard memory seats so that two drivers can easily position it with the press of a button. I do have to tilt the seat backwards as headroom is not great...but it is sufficient and an overall comfortable ride.
  • samspayedsamspayed Member Posts: 1
    I'm 6' 6", 35 inseam, 37 sleeve. I bought a 1999 Acura TL this past weekend and like it so far. The 8 way power seat took a little bit of adjusting so that my head would clear the roof, and only a short-legged person would fit behind me, but other than that it is very roomy, luxurious, quiet, and powerful. It comes standard with a sunroof and I really wanted a sunroof. I also wanted a reliable car that would cost less than $30,000. It has plenty of thigh support and body support, and the emergency brake is foot operated without sacrificing foot room or position.

    I also tried the 1999 and 2000 Toyota Camry Solara and could not fit in those.

    Other cars I've fit in before include the Mazdas (Protege, 626, and 929) and a 1997 Ford Contour (all without sunroofs). Repairs for the Mazdas are expensive.

    Hope this helps. They just don't build cars for tall people.
  • oldpickupoldpickup Member Posts: 7
    I've just completed a fairly extensive search for an upmarket/luxury vehicle. I'm in my late twenties, 6'7" and 240lbs.

    My results were as follows:

    Mercedes - no way! I didn't fit in any of these vehicles. A distressed sales-person had me try them all (including the SUV). The problem is that the steering wheel only telescopes - no tilt, plus little room for the right knee.

    BMW - almost bought a 3 series, but had the sense to take one out for an extended test drive first. Although I fit, those bucket seats did not agree with my back. Fashion has its price, but not that one ...

    Lexus - almost bought a GS300 following the 3 series episode, but had the same issue as BMW with their bucket seats. Tons of room in the GS300, but I can't live with a seat that gives me no support in my middle back due to a curved piece/shoulder rest that digs into my shoulder blades.

    Volvo - the S70 and S80 are OK on leg-room, but again - even the legendary volvo seats had the wrong curve in those buckets.

    Toyota Avalon - the most comfortable seats that I have tried - legroom and support for the back. With the bench seat, there's even room for me to have some right knee wiggle - a definite must for long journeys. However, I'm not even 30 yet and just can't picture myself in one long term ...

    Land Rover Discovery and Range Rover - being English I was very disappointed to not fit in either of these vehicles. The dealer says that he sells Range Rovers to the local NBA team and that they fit - "but you have to sort of sit side-ways". If I'm spending $35,000+, I'm not going to "sort of sit sideways" ...

    Ford Expedition - fit OK. Scared off this vehicle by all the horror stories on reliability. One of my wife's closest friends was almost run over by her Expedition when it rolled down their steep drive towards her as she was unloading groceries while it was in "Park". This and too many other stories kept me away. Nice ride though ...

    Chevy Suburban - Again, reliability. I rack up a lot of miles and the vehicle has to be there for me. Consumer Reports rates the Chevy Suburban and all it's brethren (Yukon, Tahoe etc.) as very poor. I only want one payment each month ...

    So, after a brief spell of gloominess about possibly having to drive a boring vehicle (for my age - no offense to those with other driving needs), I took a look at the new full size Toyota Tundra. I'll probably be getting one of these in the very near future. Admittedly, not upscale/upmarket like the other vehicles I looked at - but, hey, sometimes you just have to be comfortable.

    Pros - legroom, headroom, shoulder room, hip-room. Gutsy V8 engine and smooth transmission that are the twins of those on the Lexus 450/470 equate with the smoothest ride and quietness I have witnessed in any truck based vehicle. Plus, I'd rather be driving a full-size pick-up than a rather dull Avalon!!

    Cons - availability (it's new).

    If any of you can wait until next year, the new Toyota 4Runner is supposed to be based on the Tundra platform. This should be one heck of a vehicle! There's a little information on it at:

    http://popularmechanics.com/popmech/auto2/2HAUSRP.html

    All the best to the rest of you with your car searches.
  • perezrgperezrg Member Posts: 9
    You may want to look at the 2000 Avalon as it has been restyled and while beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it is much nicer looking. It has lost the stodginess of the original design and to me looks more Lexus-like.

    The dealers should have the new brochures now, with the cars to follow in 3 - 5 weeks.
  • microrepairmicrorepair Member Posts: 508
    oldpickup:

    The MB sales person you dealt with must have been REALLY distressed ! The C-class and E-class both have telesoping/tile steering wheels. My E-class has it so I don't know where you got that info. And I know that for 99, the C-class added the tilt feature.

    If you are 6'7" I don't know how you can even sit upright in a BMW. I'm only 6'3" and don't have any headroom in any of the BMW's, not even the 7-series!! That's one area where the C and E MB's are better for me. I will admit, on the E-class, that the right kneecap doesn't have a whole lot of room due to the lower part of the dash sloping down on the right side of the steering wheel.
  • oldpickupoldpickup Member Posts: 7
    Well, if the C and E class do have tilt then I am certainly very disappointed in the sales-person. This leads me to believe that I was misled at the showroom. Admittedly, I did turn up in jeans - but I work in the high-tech industry and more formal clothing has long ago disappeared from the office. You'd think that car-dealers would be the first to see past the appearance and just concentrate on whether you are able to make the purchase or not!

    I believe that this warrants a return visit to the Mercedes dealership. If there is a tilt function on the steering wheel, I will be left with a very sour taste in my mouth. I'm pretty fired up about this now ... does anyone else have a bad experience with snooty Mercedes dealers??

    With regards to the BMW (these guys were actually very helpful). The only seating option I fit in was the Sport package. The bucket seats are deeper (even if they have the wrong curvature for my back). I was also using the advantage of my long arms and reclining the seat ...

    I still haven't actually made a purchase. The Toyota dealers all want to charge MSRP+ for a Tundra. This is pushing me back in the direction of a gas-guzzling behemoth like the Expedition. I also ran into someone who recommended I take a look at the recently remodeled Isuzu Trooper - this is also supposed to be very spacious and deeply discounted currently.
  • tallfostertallfoster Member Posts: 3
    6'8", 37 inseam.

    Currently driving 98 Accord Sedan LX V6. Good headroom (no moonroof). Legroom OK, but would like more. Key to headroom is power seat. No comparison to European manufacturer's seats, but cost effective.
    Considering a purchase. New Lincoln LS has headroom, but I'm not sure about legroom. May consider a Passat or Avalon. A6 is tight with moonroof. My experience tells me to avoid moonroofs and manual seats. MB seats go way back and may consider a used MB. BWM 7L's are great leg room and good head room. Bonneville and LeSabre are good for tall people that are not hung up on American. I have owned a LeSabre. It was OK. Many US/GM models [Regal, Intrigue, el at] have OK head room, but are iffy on legroom.
    Any feedback on Lincoln LS, Avalon, Passat, A6, or used MB's would be appreciated.
  • jenrobjenrob Member Posts: 2
    Acura TL had the most comfortable seats, but I resent paying full MSRP AND waiting up to 8 weeks.
    Tried the Honda EX 6, and loved the car but was very dissapointed in seat comfort[too short]. Camry XLE6 was pretty good on seat comfort probably owing to the extra seat adjustment options. Haven't driven the entry level Lexus yet, but the Toyota salesman told me it had the same seats as the XLE. Does anyone have another suggestion? I don't want to go much over 30K.
  • expat0007expat0007 Member Posts: 9
    I'm 6'4" with 32" inseam - I have a long upper body. I couldn't contort myself to even get behind the wheel ofthe new TL. After seeing some much taller folks talking about the TL, I will give it a try again. How did you guys get into the TL?

    The new Nissan Maxima and Infiniti I30 are longer than previous years by just over 2". They might be worth looking into as well.

    The E-class don't have a lot of leg room but they do have decent headroom even with a sunroof. In fact, they are my reference standard for headroom (that and the Honda CRV).

    Ciao,
    Mat
  • jenrobjenrob Member Posts: 2
    The TL had better thigh support. The seat is therefore more comfortable to me [ with the adjustment all the way down ]I'm 5' 10" and long waisted but the head room is fine for almost everything I've tested. What I was really complaining about was the seat length.
    Haven't tried the Maxima or the Infiniti yet.
    I may have to get over my aversion the the looks of the Maxima, as several people have suggested it. Thanks Mat
  • jason74205jason74205 Member Posts: 1
    I'm 6'5", 285 lbs, 56 inch chest, and have been searching for a new car for the past couple of months. I was originally looking for a sport ute, because of the roomy interior, but most of those were way out my price range. Then I saw and test drove the 2000 Impala LS. Love at first drive. Excellent leg and head room even with the sunroof. Also plenty of hip and shoulder room. I can not say a bad thing about this car. Mine is ordered and should arrive in the next 3 weeks. I highly recommend trying it out.
  • btroybtroy Member Posts: 92
    6'2"
    I'm a newcomer here and I'll just make one comment before you guys laugh me out of the conference-- It may not have the style and prestiege of the other cars mentioned here, but I could wear a ten-gallon-hat inside my Ford Crown Victoria and I'm always comfortable.

    Happy driving!
  • jlundgrenjlundgren Member Posts: 2
    Being from TX I do wear a ten gallon hat in my CV and I am 5'11". It also has all the leg room needed, in the front seat that is, you won't enjoy the rear. Second choice is its near clone the Merc Grand Marquis, or up scale Town Car. My wife is 5'2" and the split bench seat used in these cars accomodate all shapes and sizes.
  • rlooseyrloosey Member Posts: 1
    My son is 6'6" and had trouble finding a comfortable car until he purchased the Avalon plenty head and leg room.
  • rich5rich5 Member Posts: 3
    Has anybody 6 foot or taller have a 2000 Maxima. Edmund's shows leg room of 46 inches. Please advise.
  • ctculbertctculbert Member Posts: 1
    I am 6'7" and I just purchased a 2000 Dodge Intrepid and it has good room in it for me. I have the power seats and sun roof but still have plenty of room. The power seats are a must to set the seat low enough but otherwise I have good room it this automobile.
  • victorasvictoras Member Posts: 2
    I am 6'6" and looked at a 2000 Maxima this past summer. The steering wheel does not tilt far up at all, which made it very difficult to position my legs in a way that I could both reach the pedals and steer. Sitting in a manual SE was even worse, as there was no room to maneuver 3 pedals with 2 legs. The Maxima felt far more like a sports car when I sat in it (very much like the Prelude) rather than a typical sedan (Camry, Accord), which surprised me quite a bit.

    On a side note, even though it's not exactly a "sedan", the VW Golf with its tilt/tele wheel and tons of head room is a very comfortable car for a tall person, at least based on my test drive experience.
  • almgrenalmgren Member Posts: 1
    After a long search for my perfect car, I just purchased a Y2K MB E430. This car was not my first choice, but at 6'6" tall and mostly torso, headroom is a key consideration. My first choice would have been a BMW 540i, but I couldn't get comfortable in it without my head hitting the roof. The local dealership had a 528i without a sunroof, and I fit "snugly" - when asked, they said they couldn't custom order a 540i without a sunroof so I left. My next stop was at my local Lexus dealer where I tried the LS400 (which was my second choice). I didn't fit very well in the LS400 either. When I asked about the availabilty of LS400's without sunroofs, the sales person said he'd never seen one (even though they are OPTIONAL). Eventually, he revealed that he could order one for me, but it wouldn't arrive for four to six MONTHS! I left.

    I drove over to the local Mercedes Benz dealer and checked out my third choice, the E430. It was close and my head hit the top a bit. When asked, the dealer said I could order one with no sunroof for a $1K deposit - it would arrive in 1-1/2 months. They happened to have a '99 E320 with no sunroof and I fit comfortably. The deal was sealed. My new E430 is due to arrive next week...

    Too bad more dealers and manufacturers won't go the extra mile for their customers - the one that does gets my business.
  • perezrgperezrg Member Posts: 9
    almgren,

    Interesting report. I agree totally with your conclusion regarding customer service. I don't think that it's asking too much to have the dealer and/or manufacturer at least consider our (the customer's) point of view.

    I recently sold my Maxima (privately) and the young man that bought it told me several horror stories about the various dealerships that he had visited to look at other Maxima's. Typically he was told on the phone that they had such and such options, however, when he got there they did not. At one dealership, he made an appointment to check on one car and when he got there it wouldn't start, and once they jumped it to get it running, it didn't run right, it was very rough. This from a car that was in "mint condition" and ready to go. I guess it's just too much trouble for the salespeople to get off their duff's and grab a key to make sure that things are in order before the customer gets there. Oh well. It sure made it much easier to sell my car so I guess I shouldn't complain to much.
  • tallfostertallfoster Member Posts: 3
    Lexus GS series has the most leg room I've found. 44.1 inches by spec and it has tilt/tele wheel. Not much in the rear seat, but so what.
    Again, moonroof is an issue for those in my range (6'8"), but if you'll wait 3-6 mos. they can get one. This seems like a long time. I'm considering...

    Others:
    MB E-series ok w/o moonroof
    Maxima - steering wheel to low. headroom great
    Infiniti I30 - a bit better than Max due to wheel
    Avalon 2000 - less leg room than '99

    Be careful with new specs in Edmunds, they had Avalon and Maxima leg room wrong last time I looked.
  • orlockorlock Member Posts: 25
    The PT Crusier looks like it can fit "tall" people, but I haven't seen one.

    The Ford ZTS has a height adjusting seat and advertises that it can comfortably sit a 6'3" person.
Sign In or Register to comment.