By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
--'rocco
cupholder - no incentives but they are offering 2.9% financing on '01s. You should be able to negotiate much closer to invoice on an '01 as well. Good luck!
BTW, the A4 has a persistent rattle coming from the area between the center console and the glove compartment. Currently, we have resolved the issue by sticking a solid piece of paper between the two. I just want to be able to tell the dealership what to look for in case there's a TSB out there already.
Yes, we have discovered this as well. A glove hung over the little "hump" in the glovebox seems to have solved the noise, but is still annoying abstractly. Is this something you are allowed to annoy the service staff about, or will they laugh at you
Speed
Pat
Host
Sedans Message Board
But if they don't say anything on the driver's door jam (which is strange--I thought all mfrs put tire pressures there?), maybe it just doesn't matter too much. Could this be another indication of the magic of AWD?? :-)
which year would be best.
I'm hoping to keep the price below $30k, preferably around $28k.
I'm fairly new to shopping for audis...been driving japanese cars all my life. How's the reliability for the mentioned years of A4's?
How's service for them? I've read on VW boards that most VW dealers suck.
Any input would be appreciated!
Unless there is some other cause, this is nothing to worry about and is apparently "normal" procedure for all European cars (the application of this protectant, not the smell -- but I suppose that is fairly common too).
Billy
DRC4
cupholder-- Are you referring to hibiscus red??? ...hmmm, that was actually my first choice when originally shopping for my car. Gee, I guess to each his own. I think hibiscus looks very classy on the old A4. Whenever I see one, I always have second thoughts on whether I should have held out for that color ...it's obviously not as common as my silver.
James-- I've had many Japanese cars and I too was worried about Audi reliability. Obviously an Audi won't have the reliability ratings of a Honda or Toyota but I realized that I would have to sacrifice something for that certain "feeling" that driving a German engineered car provides. I was trying to find that same, almost magical feeling of being one with the car; one with the road, that I missed so much from driving my old Scirocco and no Japanese car that I test drove came close. Yes, a Lexus or an Acura provides luxury and reliability but IMHO can't really be considered a "driver's car." The A4 came the closest, within my budget, and so what if I have to pay more in repairs or possibly be bothered by breakdowns later on down the line. I figure it's the price I may have to pay for the smile it puts on my face everytime I'm behind the wheel! Now to attempt to answer your questions. IMO, try to find the latest model year you can afford. Through it's natural evolution, the first generation A4 will obviously have more bugs worked out on a 2000 or 2001 model. I'm in the Seattle area too and as far as dealers go, Audi dealers generally provide better service than VW dealers. I did have reservations about both our local dealers because of the manner I was treated by their sales departments. I ended up purchasing my car at Roger Jobs Motors in Bellingham where I was treated with far more respect than either of the two local dealers. Also, Roger Jobs' service department has a far better reputation although they are also a VW dealer. Let me know if you'd like more information or my further opinions on our local dealers.
Tire Pressure: As Mike stated, most manufacturers put the inflation recommendations on a door jamb but Audi puts it on the fuel filler door. Audi recommends equal tire pressure on all four tires (32 psi) with a normal load. I believe they suggest a slightly higher inflation for a heavier load but I can't recall exactly what it is ...I believe it's 42 psi.
Inappropriate argument: hmmm, I missed it. *darn* :P
--'rocco
I chose the 2.8 over the 1.8 because people I know who own the 1.8 have had trouble with the turbo, and that turned me into wanting a naturally aspirated engine. I also wanted the wood, power seats and leather, etc. that are only available on the 2.8. Plus, since I was getting the tiptronic, I wanted the extra power.
I think the service at Audi has been outstanding, and the now 4 yr/50,000 mile free scheduled maintenance and bumper to bumper warranty is the best out there.
I agree with the above poster that a 2000/2001 car would have worked out alot of the bugs of buying an older A4.
Also, I would rather own the higher end luxury car, rather than the sportier 1.8 model. If I were posed with the choice of buying a new 1.8 model, or a used 2.8, I would definitely go with the 2.8 because of the reasons cited above, along with the fact that I would never buy any car in it's first model year. Not only will there be glitches and bugs in the first model year, but by the time they get to the following years, they have added little things onto the car to address issues that the car buying public want to see.
Good luck with your choice.
In January 2001, the factory was cranking out both old body style and new body style A4's -- and the Audi driving school was using what we now know as 2002's (although they were 2.5TD engined).
The S6 -- now in the US as an Avant has been in Germany for at least two years, and I believe the A8 (which came to the US as a 1997 model in the second half of 1996) was the Car of the Year (Car Magazine) in 1994.
We seem to get them here in the US -- "seem" that is -- after the first year production run, and apparently after the bugs are worked out. My wife had a 1996 A4 2.8 quattro and other than needing 2 tire replacements (for a total of three sets) in 49,000 miles was basically flawless. My A8 -- a 1997 model -- had several minor problems, most notably the boots that contain some kind of lubricant for each wheel -- in turn they all ripped and leaked a smelly (when it hit the hot rotors) goo; and the power operated steering wheel adjustment motor had to be replaced twice before 40,000 miles. Yet, I considered my A8 a very good and reliable car -- at the time -- probably because Audi took such good care of me.
Therefore, I would have no problem in getting a new US model Audi -- simply because it is generally at least one "year" old already.
BTW the new A4's are exquisite from just about any perspective -- here's hoping for a new body style S4 next year.
I do agree with you on your point about the luxury factors. If leather, wood, and automatic transmission are one's primary reason for buying an Audi, the 2.8 is definitely the better choice.
On buying a used car, one just has to hope that the prior owner understood the significance of regular oil and filter changes and that they are the kind of person who would take care of the car in the manner that you would. I would, though, want to have some of that 4 year/50,000 mile warranty left over on the car just in case of unseen or lurking problems.
Back to back test drives of a fully loaded 2001 1.8T quattro sport and a similar 2.8 -- the 1.8T is apparently peppier -- better balanced etc.
I miss the leather OPTION and the sat nav OPTION and at least a power driver's seat. But if you are the only driver, the power seat is not that big of a deal. And the perforated leatherette is pretty nice (and here in Cincinnati a leather conversion is $999 and it looks like factory original).
No wood trim, but other than that the 1.8T is very nice, very reliable -- and there are three of them in our company's parking lot and their owners love them. In fact, one gentleman said he had it narrowed down to two cars the 1.8T or the S4 -- the 2.8 wasn't even a contender. Now the 3.0 -- that may be another matter entirely.
To each his own.
Out of curiosity, why -- other than cost, which I do understand and do not criticize -- don't you want the Bose. Out of the three A4's in our parking lot, 2 have Bose -- I hate to admit it -- they are better than the non Bose -- and frankly the Bose (these systems are in 2001's BTW) aren't as good as I have heard from BMW and Lexus (as options). Right now, the Bose seems to be the best you can do in Audi's -- I have an A6 with the Bose and I liked it for a while, until I heard my friends BMW factory system. Now this does not mean I dislike my Bose, it is just not quite as good as the other German cars.
But, I digress -- what is your reason?
Curious.
Ken, the 1.8T engine rocks. OK maybe some can argue that I only have the car for 8.5 months and 11.5k miles, it has been flawless. Strong pull (oh yeah turbos like cool autumn dry air) and yet get 30mpg on the highway with an AWD car. My coworkers don't believe it. When you think about it, at the highway most of the time there is minimal high-boost situations. The turbo is just spinning along and gas consumption is like a normal 1.8L engine. I always tell people I know that Audi's (especially A4 1.8T's) are the best kept secrets. Feel the same way as Mark.
Billy
Billy
MSRP = 650.00
When I had a Mercedes 190E I always felt like a second class citizen to the mink stoled S class owners. Not so at the Audi dealership. The big difference is that the Audi service guys seem to respect owners who are into the cars rather than the Mercedes guys who seemed to consider such owners a pain.
I have a Y2K 1.8T Quattro with tip, and the turbo has been wonderful. Granted, I only have 15K mi on the car, but even the guys over at AudiWorld who have 70+K mi on their 1.8Ts have reported no turbo problems....at least that I've read.
Audi's 1.8T engine was named one of the ten best, and for good reason.....it's reliable, powerful for its displacement, smooth with little or no turbo lag, and can be "upgraded" via chipping, etc. The 1.8T's turbo shouldn't even be a concern in choosing between the 1.8T and 2.8.
DRC4
Thanks
One thing I noticed that I personally didn't like on the '99 A4s (my wife didn't care)...were the stock "sports" wheels. My Maxima's wheels look better than they did. However, the stock 2001 "sports" wheels looked very nice.
I also believe that 2000 model year had a few minor changes in the car. Right? So in that sense...it's better than a 99.
*sigh*...decisions decisions
The only other Audi dealer that i know of is in tacoma. So definitely...let me here what you got to say about them!
I wonder if they'd go down to 28.5k?
I have had experiences at both dealerships and can give you my opinion. I'll send you a separate email so it is in a less public forum.
http://www.rogerjobs.com/f_audi.html
or
http://www.rogerjobsaudi.com/
Yeah, that sounds high. IMO, I'm sure that you'd be able to negotiate a much better price. I'd guess even lower than the 28.5k figure. If you're spending that much for a used car, personally and as Ken suggested, I'd consider a new 2002 1.8T. You could get a nicely equipped 1.8T for right around 30k and less if you opted out of things like Xenon lights and Bose. My preference would be to have a brand new 1.8T than a two year old 2.8 for the right around the same money. Most of us that have the 1.8T just love the engine and it is actually rated more reliable than the 2.8 by Consumer Reports.
Okay, James, hopefully I can get an email to you in the next few days.
--'rocco
--'rocco
thanks
thanks