By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
As we have been discussing, to each his/her own. But I think the main reason the dealer said "not too many people buy -- fill in the blank" -- had a lot more to do with what was in stock than anything else.
I suspect that not too many people would want the Bose system or heated seats or Xenons, if the lot was full of cars without them.
I guess Audi is trying to actually become like other car dealers -- i.e., you test drive and buy off the lot.
At my Cincinnati dealer (Audi's and Porches at one location) the dealer claims that the majority of the cars sold have been ordered. I bought two Audi's (out of two dozen, since 1978) off the lot. I would not have a problem buying off the lot, it is just that the inventory of so many dealers (we have two in Cincinnati, for example) does not include enough combinations and permutations (for me).
My wife and I order our Audi's -- with lead times of 3 - 5 months, because the cars we want (in our heads as we drive to the dealership) have "never" been in stock.
So, my point is -- when "all" the Audis have the rear seat air bags, the dealerships will, of course, push them.
For my $.02, I would NOT have a car without them -- just in case.
Incidentally, I'm a Cincinnati resident too. I ordered through Beechmont, as they were able to guarantee an Avant for me before my current lease runs out in May. I vastly prefer ordering, especially in a situation like a lease when you know exactly when you will need a new car and can plan ahead. There is nothing inherently wrong with taking dealer stock, but I am picky enough that it is unlikely that a small-volume dealership like our 2 Audi places here in Cincy would have what I would want. Now if I was shopping for a Camry, and there were a hundred on the lot...
From your posts it seems like the A4 is a great car so long as you get rid of it before the 4 year/50K mile warranty runs out and you have a knowledgable and honest dealer.
Is there a reliable and honest Audi dealer in NJ? Does anyone keep the car beyond 5 years?
Thanks and Happy Holidays.
reng
That said, there is NO WAY I am going to allow my children in a car with side airbags.
Best Regards,
Shipo
- Kids should not ride in the front seat at all
- An air bag deploying into the front of a child or especially into the rear of a rear-facing child seat is dangerous
- Data regarding side-impact airbags and kids are lacking, however bags that are mounted in the seats (as Audi, Toyota, and I believe BMW among others do) appear to be safer than side bags mounted in the door.
- Most air bag injuries of all sorts (kids and adults) occur with unbelted or improperly secured individuals
In addition, although there have without a doubt been scores of airbag injuries, it is much easier to measure these injuries than to figure out how many injuries were PREVENTED by the bags, i.e. how do you if someone would have been hurt without a bag in place?
Unfortunately, this leaves car buyers/parents with the conundrum of making an important decision without the benefit of conclusive data. My own feeling based on reviewing what data we do have is that PROPERLY secured child + side airbag = greater safety than the alternative. That being said, I would never argue with someone like Shipo who appears to have made a similarly reasoned decision not to get the bags. The medical literature is chock full of such on one hand/on the other hand type recommendations. My original position, which I stand by, is that if finances force you to choose only certain options and not others, go with the safety first.
My understanding is that there is not yet a chip for the 02s, but several vendors are working on them.
It is also my understanding that you can swap chips in and out for service, but that the chipped engine will generate a bunch of funky error codes that the service techs will be able to read from the car's computer. Audi can void any engine/turbo problem from warranty coverage if a chip has been used. Caveat emptor!
Now, we all know or at least have heard of people who were killed by their seatbelts -- or, fill in the blank. And, until all cars come equipped, standard with 8 or more airbags, I assume that freedom of choice will win out and that people will opt some to buy and some not to buy. I have no problem with that.
But, I agree with Rick when he explains in detail the issues with some of the active and passive restraint systems that are available -- the most important being "user error." Moreover, I agree that there is a significant difference between in door and in seat airbags. Audi uses in seat airbags and I believe that NOT getting these airbags makes about as much sense as arguing that wearing seatbelts can trap you in the car and that you are better off being thrown out of the car by the force of the accident.
Conversely, as I believe in free will and free choice, I do not criticize anyone for electing NOT to get them. But, I also believe that there is more evidence that suggests and [attempts to] quantifies that USED PROPERLY, the statistical chances are in your [passenger's] favor if you HAVE the rear SEAT (not door) airbags.
This does not mean that people have not been injured or killed while sitting in the back seat of a car so equipped. It does bear looking into to see if the passenger was wearing the lap or lap shoulder combination, etc.
I see so many people who ride in cars equipped with airbags and proclaim, "I don't need seatbelts, the airbags will protect me." Give me a break.
So, no criticism about anyone not buying airbags (that are optional). I am concerned however that the reasons stated MAY not be accurate. So, while I applaud free choice, free will and "to each his/her own," I am greatly concerned that the reasons stated are perhaps accurate from a certain point of view (just as "I was thrown clear from the wreckage because I wasn't wearing my seatbelt" is accurate from a certain viewpoint).
Many of us, myself included, rely on boards such as these for information, opinion and fact alike. At this point, I assume we would overwhelmingly agree that wearing the seat/shoulderbelt combination while driving is information that can save lives. I suppose that there is somewhat more argument possible about airbags (no matter where they are located). However, in my opinion (although I would feel comfortable if someone deemed it factual, in the same way seatbelt [safety] claims are accepted as factual)I believe that an Audi with front, front seat side, ceiling and rear seat side airbags when USED PROPERLY add an extra measure of survivability.
If you don't want an airbag for whatever reason, fine by me. But, I am concerned that we should not be too quick to proclaim them as dangerous -- when USED PROPERLY.
-nobee
Billy
2001 Prelude Type SH, 2022 Highlander XLE AWD, 2025 Camry SE AWD
German drivers tend to be very aggressive. If you're not going at least 200kph (~120mph) you have no right in the left lane-and they'll definitely let you know about it!
Here in Chicago some people don't signal or even signal the wrong direction.....their argument is, if you signal (or in the right direction), other drivers are not going to let you in LOL! I guess signaling is a sign of weakness!
-nobee
‘nuff said.
Best Regards,
Shipo
-nobee
It is hard to summarize a 300 page book in a sentence or two, but the thing that stikes me as the reason that 120MPH is "safe" on the German Autobahn is "lane discipline" -- no passing on the right, each lane to the left travels at a higher speed and there is a very high utilization of turn signals.
I have driven on the autobahn, most recently between Munich and Garmisch -- in a Mercedes E-class turbo diesel -- average speed in "the zone" about 190kph, peak speed -- for me -- 220+kph (and I was still being passed by other cars).
When you look in your mirror and see a car blink its left turn signal, you move over, the car passes, you signal with a blink of your left turn signal and the car ahead of you moves over. If you are in the center lane, you signal with your left signal move over to pass (left of course) then signal with your right signal and move back to the center lane.
There are few "left lane bandits" -- none that I ever found, frankly. Virtually no one passes on the right and there is an incredible amount of poise and politeness (and an urge to go very very fast). Nothing that I could tell resembled our "normal" road rage or aggressive driving -- even though driving very very fast by its nature seems aggressive (to most Americans).
I felt safer on the German AutoBahn at 220kph than I do on the Cincinnati Interstates at 80 -100 kph, primarily because so much of the [German] behavior was "predictable" -- lane one very very fast, lane two very fast, lane three fast and trucks (from left to right), pass on left, get out of the way when signalled to do so.
Now, Italy, especially Rome and Florence -- now there's another story.
Well, not exactly...
The lease on my 1999 328i is ending in April 2002. That said, I am car shopping and am undecided between the new A4 3.0 Quattro, 330i or 530i, or of course, keeping the 328i a few more years (I only have 33,000 miles on it so far).
Best Regards,
Shipo
I feel much safer driving on European roads, even in a small rented Ford Kia.
Daniel
Yeah I know those moving 90mph parking lots.....we got those here in Chicago too.....and add in rain, it's terrible cuz you can't see what's in front of ya with all the rain misting......
Billy
A friend and I stumbled upon a History channel program on Xmas Eve regarding the efforts of Mercedes Benz and Auto Union in Auto racing during Hitlers early reign. Due to the war the racing programs went away but it was really amazing what the two companies had accomplished up to that point. Any one else happen to catch this? I think it was called Ultimate cars-The Silver Bullets. Very good program for Audi enthusiasts. Hope everyone had a safe and Happy Holiday.
Brian
Yeah, I know that the Avant will only be available in a few months time and then probably without CVT. There is also no certainty whether they will all be QTR or not. Apparently the Audi engineers have a bit of a space problem matching the CVT 'box with QTR. From what I have read the CVT 'box is awesome and is really the best of both worlds (Auto and Manual). I am scared to go for a test drive as I do not want to change cars at this stage.
One of my cars is coming off lease in a year's time and I trust the QTR/CVT combination will be available by then. That is what I am "waiting" for.
The only CVT vehicle I test drove was the Civic HX. It's just interesting to gain speed and don't feel your seatback slamming your back and all the jolts associated with the gear changes. The engine just hums along with the same note all the time. I like the Audi CVT commercial they have in Germany with that lady in a CVT 02 A4. A guy is driving his rough-riding car and his little plastic Elvis-like (but with white hair) dashboard doll dances like crazy. His car breaks down. He is rescued by an attractive woman, who gives him a lift in her Audi CVT 02 A4. He takes his dashboard doll with him and sheepishly installs it in her car. The doll doesn’t dance because the Audi rides so smoothly. Disappointment shows on the guy’s face. Then he starts to tinkle the doll and it started to dance a little bit and he's happy again. It stirred up a cult that Audi started to sell the little Elvis and taking in as many as 150,000 orders. Pretty interesting. Here's the report:
http://www.drivetime.co.za/intlnewcars_audi_elvis.html
Here's the video clip:
http://www.elvis.com.au/mpg/elvis_audi.mpa
Billy
I know that there are books that detail the history of Audi, but has there been any video documentaries that cover this?
I am not sure if there is anything out on video but give me some time and I'll try and do some digging on my off days (I have a 4 day weekend coming up!) and see what I can find out. I'll post anything that might be of interest to our fellow enthusiasts. I'm glad someone else had the chance to see it because it really changed my perception of Auto Union and MB. They really did some incredible work and paved the way later on for racing as we know it today. Thanks for the input, glad you saw it too!
Regards,
Brian
For more info look at the Tire Rack page, these tires got great ratings all around.
Mark, are those Yokohama AVS db high perf all seasons too?
Billy
In case you are interested Classic motorbooks (motorbooks.com) has 2 videos that might be something to check out. Both are $19.95 and cover some good ground about pre-war racing. The first is called Racing Silver-Great German racing cars. Covers the MB and Auto Union battles plus some coverage of BMW and Porsche. 90 min. run time.
The second is called Pre-War motor racing 1900-1939. No details on makes or drivers but it is an hour long so it may cover more general ground.
Last but not least a book that sounded good. Quick Silver-Development of German Grand Prix racing cars 1934-1939. B&W illustrations and diagrams hardbound 143 pages. $60.00.
Hope this helps if I find anything else I'll let you know!
Brian
AVS dB decibel:
"Quite possibly the quietest ultra-high
performance tire available today. AVS dB's
unique casing technology absorbs bumps
without sacrificing lateral stiffness and
combines the highest degree of comfort
without compromising handling, traction or
performance."
Nice review over on AudiWorld @ http://www.audiworld.com/reviews/wheels/wheels03.shtml
Thanks for the suggestion though. I'm thinking of getting 16" instead of 17" rims cuz of all the potholes and rough roads here in Chicago.
Billy
Aside from the narrow armrest that doesn't hold very much, and only changes its angle (could not believe the handbrake hits the armrest in lowest position, and is awkward with the armrest down, I found the climate controls buried in a dark and dingy "tunnel" that made things very hard to operate, especially with sunglasses on.
Previously, the stack was sloped at an angle that made controls at the bottom a bit easier to see. The 2001 model is angled so the face of the controls is flush with the knee bolster instead of recessed about 3 cm. In 1999, the most commonly used controls (seat heater, front and rear defrosters, recirculator) were at the top of the stack (above the radio). The dealer tried to rationalize the position of the climate controls on the concept of "set it and forget it". But if you find the preset temp too warm, you have to take your eyes off the road, search for the digital temperature readout and push the up/down buttons. With the red markings in daylight with sunglasses, this is dangerous.
MB and Volvo both have dual zone automatic climate control, but use dials to adjust the temperature. They are also angled for good visibility.
I through this out for comment from owners of 2002 models to see if this has been a particular problem.
Unlike the post above, I really like the layout of the interior, including the center stack. I've found that once I've spent some seat time in a new car I intuitively find the controls, any ergonomic issues fade with familiarity.
Other cars on my compare list are the MB C240 and BMW 325. I think the A4 beats either hands down.
I'll check these out :-)
Paul
This is josh from texas. I just picked my new '02 V6 Quattro Step today in Dallas. Silver with platinum, sport package. just put 100 miles on it bringing it home. great car. Excuse the 325, its for the bimmer I traded in for it. anyway, just wanted to introduce myself, I've got to go watch this video now. josh
Brian
But I wouldn't put it past someone who lost traction on ice and ended up totalling the car in a ditch and then tried to sue Audi because the snowflake symbol didn't appear when it was 18° out! *heh* I know in the Ford Probe I had, the trip computer would flash "ice" for about 10 seconds whenever the outside temperature would drop below 37° ...that was kind of cool. It would even flash if the ignition was turned on at any temperature below that figure ...well, I remember it being about 12° out once and it was flashing.
--'rocco
Just wanted to pose a quick question: Has anybody found an attractive way to enhance their right side-view mirror? After ~six months of driving my 2001.5 1.8T, my biggest gripe is a blind spot on the right rear passenger side. I vaguely remember that this topic was addressed months ago, but I don't remember specific suggestions. If I look over my right shoulder to change lanes, my view is obscured by the C pillar. If I rely on the side mirror, in heavy traffic I still can't tell quickly whether the way is clear. I'm 5'1" and I've tried different seating positions/mirror positions, but the problem persists. My husband, who's 5'9" and who sits with the seat lower and farther back, has the same problem. I don't want to stick some tacky-looking Kmart mirror onto that side mirror, but I'm about ready to do that in desperation. Suggestions, anyone?
Oh, so has anyone else have that dreaded MIL (check engine warning lamp) light up? ...I just noticed that mine's on now *waaaah* Probably because I've let the car sit for a few weeks without starting it. Hopefully it will go off after a few more starting cycles.
And Billy, do you know anywhere in the U.S. where we can buy those Elvis dolls? Probably not for it appears that they're pretty scarce in Germany right now according to that article. But I'd sure like to get one. *lol*
--'rocco
No MIL light yet
Thanks for the help with the display on my earlier post. Found my lower speaker cover on driver side door which is plastic is cracked and broken, oh well cold weather and some pressure can do that.
Brian
And yeah, the cold weather is making me notice more creaking in the interior. I have the right side back door panel creaking happening again
Karen-- When I drove the car last night, I concentrated on how much of a blind spot was created when using the right mirror. Ya know, I really didn't find that the mirror wasn't showing the entire right lane. It seemed that I could view an upcoming vehicle overtaking me in the right lane right up until I could see it in my peripheral vision as I was viewing the mirror straight on. But I adjust the right mirror so I'm not seeing the side of the car unless I tilt my head slightly to the right and slightly rearward. In-other-words, if I'm sitting at the wheel completely straight in an upright position and looking forward, I'm not seeing the side of my car in the right mirror when I glance at the mirror from that postion. This could throw some people off because if one can't see the side of the car, then there's no point of reference and the view in the mirror might become disorienting. I've adjusted mirrors this way for so long that I'm used to tilting my head just slightly to the right/back to get a quick glimpse of the side of my car to avoid becoming disoriented when viewing the mirror. Using this adjustment gives a wider overall field of vision when viewing the mirror because it is adjusted more "outward" than probably where you have yours positioned ...maybe not much, but maybe just enough to eliminate that blind spot you're finding. I also adjust it "lower" than the normal person. I don't necessarily want to view a lot of sky in the mirror ...I just want to barely view the horizon --again, this will tend to cover more of that blind spot. So, if you were to sit in my driver's seat right now, you probably would be tempted to adjust the mirror more inward and upward from what you are used to. It might take a little getting used to but you might want to try adjust your mirror slightly "outward" and "downward" from where you have it now. But I don't know, you've already said that you've tried many adjustments so maybe you'll just have to relent and get one of those Kmart specials. *lol*
Tires: Yokohama AVS dB vs Dunlop SP Sport 5000 (Asymetrical): I too am considering 16" wheel/tire for all-season use ...specifically, 205/55-16. Both the Yokohamas and the Dunlops are classified as "ultra high performance all-season" and are about the same price. From what I've read on both Tirerack's site and other survey sites, I've concluded that the Dunlops are probably the way to go primarily because they are rated better in snow. The Yokohamas are rated better overall but not by much. If I were in a climate where snow wasn't a consideration then it would appear the Yokohamas would definitely be a better choice. Or, if I were going with a 15" OEM sized replacement, I might be tempted to go with the Yokohamas as the "symetrical" Dunlops (60 series profile) are not as highly rated in snow as the "asymetrical" Dunlops that come in the 55 series profile. So to summarize, I'm leaning toward getting the 205/55-16 Dunlop SP Sport 5000 Asymetrical to use both in the summer and winter. Anyone have any arguments to change my mind?
--'rocco
--'rocco
The positive (from users) write ups about the AVS db's would seem to me to be encouragement for Yokohama to make more sizes available.
Time will tell.
Since I don't really know where the sensor is for the temp readout, I can therefore only assume that it is less likely for the road surface to change as the temperature drops from, for example, 20F to 9F (like it did here in Cincinnati last night). By the same token, once the temperature has risen to above 41, no change is likely to happen that would lower traction.
--'rocco
Audibon, yeah I agree with all the other guys and my own observation is, the snowflake did disappear below 23F. I got some funny comments from my passengers asking me if the car can predict when it's going to snow.....hehe. My opinion is, under 23F, the roads are usually colder than freezing. Let's say the outside temp is 30F. The snow flake symbol, to me, is telling me the roads might be still above freezing (32F) and at that stage, once the snow hits the ground, it's going to melt. The problem is, once the 30F wind blows over it, it starts to freeze and that's when the slick road situation shows up. Now let's say the outside temp is 10F (like last nite). If it does snow, since the road surface is long under 32F, the snow won't be melted by the roads surface but instead just pile up or just being blown away. Of course you can argue that let's say right before a stoplight the heat generated by the tires contacting the road might melt the snow. True, at least not as bad as the roads when the outside temp is 30F. Just my $0.02.
Karen, to solve the my left side blindspot problem, I bought a cheapo blindspot spotter from Target and it got a suction cup below the convex mirror. I stuck that just to the left of the rear view mirror. It gave me a full 180 view from about the middle of the rear window and the whole left side of the car. I think you can use the same thing and make the mirror "looks" at the right side of the car. I can try that when i go to the car later today and let you know how it works out. And yes, those 2002 side mirrors are smaller than our 2001.5's. And I don't remember 100% but i think those side mirrors are not that much convex on the 02's than the 01.5's, but of course if they are really convex, given the physics of a convex mirror, the distance between you and the actual car on your right lane is going to be shortened by a lot, so drivers need to relearn that.....any 02 owners wanna verify if they got really convex side mirrors?
Scirocco, I think your MIL is on cuz you didn't drive your car enough and it's complaining :> Is it just flashing or it's solid? You better have it checked out if it's on solid. I'm still doing research on where to buy those Elvis dolls here.....and actually there are some Germans who are selling them and are willing to ship them here.....
Audibon, about that symphony radio, yes just like Rocco said I did experience a total "outage" about 2 months after I bought the car. Tried all the buttons and it's "dead". I thought it's the fuse but it's not blown.....however, the amp figure showing on the fuse is upside down on the fuse panel. Now that shouldn't matter, but heck, maybe it's dirty on the connections so I took it out and wipe it clean, turned it back to the right position, and plugged it back in. Wah-la, it worked. Try it.....and hopefully that does the trick. About skipping tracks.....I haven't got that problem yet and I play my CD's regularly. Maybe you can try to clean your CD head with those CD head cleaner..... And crossing my fingers, I haven't had anything cracked or not working yet.....and it's now 13,450 miles after it celebrated its 10 month b-day yesterday. Oh wait, actually the right side passenger vent's linkage was broken (can't change the vent direction from left to right) and it's replaced by the dealer, of course free. No big deal.
Mark, yeah I realized you must be buying those tires for your 4.2.....sweet ride I must add with those flared wheel walls.....they look so aggressive. Thanks for your AVS db tire review though. However, I think I'm doing the 205/50/16's with Dunlop SP5000 Asym too, Rocco, just like you saw cuz they're rated better in the snow. So Mark, you run 255's AVS db's in the snow in Cincinnatti? Wow is it still alright with the wide ultra high perf all seasons in the snow?
Billy
BTW, guys, you'll love this: sad proof that part of this country is still in the Dark Ages. Over the holidays I was in a rough, blue-collar part of New Jersey, in a room full of people where the subject of cars came up. Somebody asked what kind of car I'd ended up buying; I still remember his response: "Audi...Audi...Ain't dat one a dem Goiman cahs?"
Sigh....