By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I suspect a person could tow more than the current 2000 lb. rating with some add-on coolers but you would void the warranty in the process.
Still looks like the Toyota Tundra is best option for comfort and towing even though I will be giving up some fuel economy---same as I would with an Explorer. Too bad the CV and Marquis product managers aren't a little smarter about ways to pick-up incremental sales easily. I think there are many more people that want to tow 3500-5000 lbs. without buying a truck or SUV that gives poor gas mileage (even when not towing) and that doesn't provide the comfort the CV and Marquis do. Although the truck and SUV market is still hot, there are signs the market for these is starting to flatten out and people are starting to look at other modes of transportation. Come on Ford, get ahead of the curve again like you did with the Explorer---which is quite a while ago.
The local dealer advertised 5000 lb. towing capability for these cars until 2000, when I asked him to show me the option and rating. Two weeks later the claim disappeared from his ads!! He must have thought it was a useful way to sell cars too!!
If Ford OK'd rating these cars to tow 5000 lbs. with the old suspension, they could choose to do so again with the new suspension. Something else drove their decision.
I suspect a person could tow more than the current 2000 lb. rating with some add-on coolers but you would void the warranty in the process.
Still looks like the Toyota Tundra is best option for comfort and towing even though I will be giving up some fuel economy---same as I would with an Explorer. Too bad the CV and Marquis product managers aren't a little smarter about ways to pick-up incremental sales easily. I think there are more people that want to tow 3500-5000 lbs. without buying a truck or SUV that gives poor gas mileage (even when not towing) and that doesn't provide the comfort the CV and Marquis do.
The local dealer advertised 5000 lb. towing capability for these cars until 2000, when I asked him to show me the option and rating. Two weeks later the claim disappeared from his ads!! He must have thought it was a useful way to sell cars too!!
Ken
I have a '96 Crown Vi ex police car. When I bought it, it didn't have a horn! Where would I be able to find the place in the engine compartment where it can be found and to be able to hook it back up?
25 MPG at 65 MPH on the interstate.
22 MPG at 72 MPH on the interstate.
17-19 MPG in urban driving (35-55 MPH with some stop lights and stop signs) with easy acceleration and deceleration.
11 MPG towing a 3500 lb boat and trailer at 65-72 MPH.
Now that we have moved to our new platform, we no longer have the requirement to stop and restart discussions after the numbers of posts exceed a certain limit. To keep from confusing our newer members down the road, we are going through the discussion list bit by bit and dropping the "part" numbers associated with some of our extended discussions.
Since this will be the permanent home for discussion of these vehicles, I have removed the "2" from the title of this discussion and altered the archived version to distinguish it from this one.
Please continue....
Pat
Host
Sedans and Women's Auto Center Message Boards
I have been looking at older Crown Vics and found a 93 with 71,000 owned by some old people who claim to have rarely drove it in winter which is nice to hear in Minnesota. They want $5,200 for it and I am seriously considering it.
Do you think that this car would survive 4 years of driving 60-80 miles a day round trip to go to college and work? My main concern is reliability but I also can't argue with a V8
So basically all I need to know is do you think a 93 CV would serve me better than a 94 Achieva over the next 4 years of heavy driving?
Thanks for any help you can give me!
Check the service records if they have them. You should get the tranny fluid changed right after you buy the car, unless they have a receipt for a recent change. Make sure there's not excessive smoke coming from the tailpipe. Get regular maintenance (use 5W30 oil) and you'll be alright.
I am sure I will be able to get him down to $5000 though. I am going to look at it tonight in detail and talk to the guy. I have read probably about 500 of the posts under this topic so I will be sure to check out all the things people have recommended, including the smoke from the tailpipe.
Thanks for the help everyone and I will let you know how it all goes when I get back from checking it out
The guys 60 year old wife is the only one who ever drove it and she got the oil changed and the tires rotated every 3000 miles at their local Sinclair station.
I started talking to him about the price and was about to ask him to drop it a little but then on his own he said that he thinks a fair price would be $5000.
Then, possibly the biggest coincidence of all, I mentioned I would be attending the UofM in the fall for computer science. He said that the software design company that he works for hires interns from the UofM to help with the computers and network and he said if I wanted to do that next fall I should just let him know and he will hook me up with a job!
You need to know that the 93 model year is the last for the old style freon A/C and if your compressor goes south - forget about replacing it - too costly to convert to new type on a car that old. Also - freon is expensive and hard to come by these days.
These vehicles are a great used value and you should do well with the choice.
Best wishes
Ken
What's the pros and cons? Any problems? I hear back seat leg room is tight. What is their prettist "light" exterior color? Thanks.
Results from 4/19/01 Dispute Settlement Board. Ford will BUY BACK and refund the total purchase price including sales tax and fees. A deduction for mileage will be made back to the first time in service department for this problem. My advice is to attend the DSB hearing if at all possible. My hearing involved a 600 mile round trip which I'm sure was to discourage my making an apperance. If you rely on only your application statements I'm sure you will lose. Good Luck.
What do I need?
thanks for any help you can give me.
Be sure the convertor is drained and a little air pressure used to blow out the cooler lines.
It seems my problem isn't from the engine. I've been told it's the new size tires from 1997 on up. They went from 15" to 16". That combined with rear wheel drive, makes the car ride like a basketball over bumps of any kind.
Anyone thinking of a 2001 Grand Marquis?? Pay attention to the ride and handling. They're not like they used to be.
listed. Can anyone tell my why ???
travel trailer. Can a 98 Gran Marq LS be
equipped to do this. If so, what would be
the max trailer or tongue weight?
that trailer has to be.
I just got rid of my V8 Tbird (bought new) because of the endless transmission troubles (started at about 20K), and lastly the knob on the side of the gear shaft sticking so hard I couldn't even push it in and get the gear off parking mode. I lately have had to get rid of car payments in a hurry so that is the main reason why I sold my '97 Tbird most of all.
I've been stuck in a rental car for 4 days now and desperately looking for something to replace my car. I am tall and safety paranoid, and I hate small cars and won't be caught dead in anything weighing less than 3,000 lbs. Becuse of my bad experience with the Tbird, I would have sworn any Ford off until I came to this board. Roominess and safety are top on my list of must haves, and I have resigned myself to let go of the nice sport look when I let go of the Tbird.
My urgent need for the next 2 or 3 years is to get a personal car that is highly reliable (66 miles a day) and big and safe, and PAID FOR the second I put the key in the ignition. Budget is $5,000 or so maximum. I suddenly find myself thinking about getting a CV 94 to fit my budget and needs, but I am scared I'll get into the same trouble I just let go of with the Tbird.
I miss the 4.6 V8 and would love to get it back, but I certainly don't want the transmission and other troubles that came with it back. Am I making a mistake by considering a CV? Is the transmission system exactly the same in Tbirds and CVs? Is the CV a good choice for what I want?
I need an interim car that won't let me down or cost too much in repairs for 3 years or so, so I can save up for the next, newer car of choice.Any feedback appreciated. Being without a car is hell.
The auction seems like a good idea, but how do you manage to not get burned? I mean I never buy a vehicle without a compression test done on it first. This saved me big $$ again just a few days ago as I was about to purchase something that looked and drove apparently fine. Seems to me when you buy at auction you really don't know what you're getting, but maybe I just don't know what I am talking about...
What I want doesn't exist yet (hybrid that has a wagon's cargo, a pickup truck high-road view, a sporty sedan look's cushy,powerful ride and road stability) ---this writes off SUVs in a hurry---
re98d, I think you are one of the lucky EXCEPTIONS to the Thunderbird owners rule.
I don't have anything against Ford other than they are notorious for screwy transmission ---I used to have a Mercury Capri 86 that had a great transmission that never shuddered or banged (only leaked). But then, as mentioned on this board somewhere, a Ford vehicle doesn't automatically mean you get a Ford transmission inside either, so it's hard to know what you can feel confident with unless you're an expert mechanic or an auto nut. If some of you think I should look into GM instead and then have less to worry about, it's good to know.
thanks!