Pontiac Grand Prix - 2000-2005

1444547495087

Comments

  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    Why can't Honda make the Coupe look exactly like the Sedan? The Coupe is for the 20-35 year old age audience while the sedan is to sell to the 35-50 year old audience like family's. As a Honda fan the Accord Sedan is too bland. The Coupe is good looking though.

    As for Pontiac caddling I really didn't notice it on 80's models for Pontiac. From 1992-1999 it looked terrbile on Pontiac models though. As for Mitsu I think there is cladding on the Montero. The 2000+ Eclipse has those ripple strips on the doors sort of like the Ripples potato chip. The optional caldding on the 03 Corolla I do not like. The cladding on the 99-03 RX 300 looked alright. I don't like the new 4 Runner. The new one is too gimmcky looking. The 97-02 Runnner was one of the most beaufiful and timless looking SUV's I have ever seen. I'm not an SUV fan but I did like the previous generation 4 Runner. Toyota did a good job with the Celica. It kind touches that borderline of gimmcky but doesn't cross it.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    CarGuy58, You are exactly right about the Accord. Hopefully Honda makes cosmetic changes to that UGLY rear on the sedan. The funny thing is that they will still sell their 400,000 copies... regardless. Historically Honda/Toyota have always made the CamAccord bland/Dull. that is one reason I have never bought one.... the other reason being as that everybody and their brother drives one. As soon as you shut the door in the parking lot on one, you can literally lose it in the parking lot. There are so many there. I liked cars like My Aurora/ 2 door GTP coupe, that there wasn't alot of them on the road and they have styling. Just me.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Evandro, What was incompetent about the Max/I35 abs system? Could also be the factory/stock tires?

    The ABS system on my 2001 I30t is ok, The Factory 17" speed rated Bridgestone tires are bad in the snow/rain, which makes the ABS come on much faster then it should, no traction, but good on dry pavement.

    The 3.0L 227 horse engine was perfectly suited to that car, not much torque steer in mine, however the 3.5L, is horrendous...
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    I was referring to that comparative test between the GP and the Maxima that a Canadian reporter did on GM proving grounds with Bob Lutz that someone posted a link about in this forum.

    In that test, the Maxima would always end up 90° on the road after braking on uneven pavement. I don't know about you, but I'd never buy a car that did that, even if it's just a sample.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I've seen several Accord coupes and they are really nice. Why Honda ruined the sedan with the bad rear is beyond me.

    Accords are just everywhere though, they are the Japanese Taurus. GPs are much less common and much nicer to look at.
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    Its styling is way more attractive than the sedan's, yet it's only good beside the horrendous sedan, IMO. To me, it's just a quilt of triangles all over: front end, green house profile, tail lights... :-D
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    <<<Accords are just everywhere though, they are the Japanese Taurus. GPs are much less common and much nicer to look at. >>>

    Exactly!! Especially my GTP COUPE, I very rarely see a GTP coupe, when I do its usually a GT. Too bad GM killed the coupe which had the same size as the sedan.

    Only problem with the Accord Coupe is that it is SMALLER then the sedan.. trunk is only like 12.5 cu ft. Where as the OLD GP the coupe was identical, right down to the same 16.0 cu ft trunk.
  • jpstaxjpstax Member Posts: 250
    Has anyone seen the acceleration times for the '04 GTP (Series III engine) yet? They've got to be a little faster than the '03 GTP and Regal GS (Series II motor). The published times for both cars are 6.6 and 14.9 seconds (0-60 and 1/4 mile). I imagine the Impala SS will be the same as '03s.
  • richm4richm4 Member Posts: 169
    I'm getting about 18-19 mpg in mostly city driving in my 04 GTP. One word of warning with the GTP, be sure you like a very stiff ride because that's what you'll be getting. It's much firmer than the GT2.

    Insurance is very reasonable too. Especially for such a sporty car.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Jpstax, I've seen the 1997 GTP run as low as 6.6 when it first came out, depends on the tester/temp esp with a supercharged car, Superchargers like the cooler weather. For very cheap you can change the pulley and add 30-40horse instantly Bringing you into the low 6 sec range. The stock 240 horse GTP just wasn't fast enough, so I modded mine.

    Richm4, As I posted earlier, a GTP is about 20% less to insure then a Mustang/Camaro V8. A GTP is NOT much more to insure then the GT. Yes one of my complaints on the 1997-03 GTP was the very stiff ride, but it also handles slightly better then the GT, so thats the penalty. 18-19mpg? The car is only EPA rated at 18, nice. I only get 14, but mine is modded to nearly 300 horse.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Ya, I've read in a few places that the GTP suspension is very firm. GT1/2 are better suited to most people's driving which is why they will make up the bulk of sales.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Dindak, the reason the GT 1/2 will make up the bulk of the sales is because of the PRICE. Some people don't want to spend the extra $2 or $3k for the GTP. Also the GTP uses premium gas and costs slightly more to insure.

    GTP sales were only about 25%-30% of the total GP's from 1997-2003. For me, I like the supercharged engine on the highway, the regular 3800 doesn't have enough after 40mph for me.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    I don't even like the new Accord coupe that much. From the rear it has some MB in it, but the front is pure Honda and that ain't a good thing in my book(just how much bigger can they make that stupid looking "H"). And besides, everyone and their uncle has an Accord.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Of course price and the fact that most people are perfectly happy with 200 hp in a sport sedan. I would not likely get a GTP either though the 260 hp would be tempting.

    I read last night that Mazda 6 sales are not going that well which is why the 0% financing has already hit the car. I wonder how 04 GP sales are going? Someone mentioned there is a $1000 cash back offer.
  • MartypaMartypa Member Posts: 50
    Cash back on the GP is $1250. I requested a quote through GM Buypower, and the internet sales manager at the dealer I contacted listed that as a current rebate. You also get an additional $500 if you own a non GM car. Current incentives are valid through early July. Below is a portion of the response from Buypower-I asked for a quote on a GT2 with several options:

    MSRP $ 26580 GM Employee Price $23580.70 plus tax, title and license.

    Also with approved credit you may select 1.9% interest for 3years; 2.9%

    interest for 4 Years; 3.9% interest for five years plus a bonus rebate of

    $250 or a cash rebate of $1250.

    These incentives would be in addition to the GM dollars and Olds Loyalty

    rebates
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Dindak, True, The New Maxima isn't selling that well either, and based on the price I can see why. You can buy an Infiniti for the same price as a loaded max with a longer warranty/free loaner cars and a better name.

    Same thing with the Marauder, was orignially selling for sticker and higher, $35k.+ Now you can get one for as low as $28k and there was a Ford $2k rebate back in October. Maruader sales were ONLY 50% of what Ford had hoped...down big time. It's a car that's body dates back to 1992 !! and the frame dates back to 1978 !! Time for a redesign on that aging body.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    You are right, that is their choice of what to drive, I never said it wasn't. For me I would never buy Camaccord too many on the road and they are OVER-RATED... and usually over priced, selling for near sticker. They have no styling appeal whatsoever, the Accord sedan is one of the ugliest sedan on the road, look at that rear , my opinion. Everyone does NOT drive a GTP, they are only about 25% of GP sales, and yes I would still drive one, provided they bring back the coupe, don't like the sedan, I personally find it to be much better then the Accord in all performance areas, my opinion. You are right that is their choice/ opinion and this mine.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    I don't get the criticism of the herd.

    If EVERYONE drove a 04 Pontiac GTP, are you saying you wouldn't? Who cares what others drive? Drive what you want. We must assume the alleged herd does.

    That's their choice. No problem, as long as it doesn't also HAVE to be mine. And it doesn't.
  • midlifecrisismidlifecrisis Member Posts: 391
    A factor in whether you may like a car or not depends on how unique it is. No matter how good a car is, I don't want to drive a car that is everywhere on the road - I want something different. So I ordered a fusion orange GP GT2. I've only seen 2 other 04 GPs on the road so far, and no orange ones.

    My neighbor came home with a new Accord last week. It is boring looking and everyone has them. No thanks.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Exactly, that is part of the reason I always bought the GTP Coupe, not many people have them, more unique on the road and its back seat is the same size as the sedan, just harder to get there. My '02 Coupe is black with the highly polished wheels and I added white racing stripes/custom grille, my GTP badging on the door is in bright yellow. The back 3 windows are tinted black. Really stands out/looks sharp. Everywhere I go, I get many compliments.. of "nice car" no matter what the age. Where as with a boring looking Camaccord, I have yet to here someone say, "hey nice car" It blends in with everything else. To each their own.

    The fusion Orange is a nice distinct color, I like it. Too bad that wasn't available on my '02 coupe...

    BTW.. Black is a very HARD to keep clean color... Nothing like a black car when its shined up well.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Did they make the power steering pump quieter on the 2004 GP?

    The 1997-2003 GP had a pretty loud wine sound when turning the wheel at low speeds. Both my 1997 and 2002 GTP coupes where that way. Also other GP's of that generation were the same when I hear them turning into a parking spot. Just curious.

    By comparison the Maxima is pretty quiet when turning.
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    Is it OK for the transmission to soup up the engine like that? Is it possible and easy to add an intercooler in the GTP? The supercharged MB have it between the rotors and the intake manifold...
  • dan165dan165 Member Posts: 653
    Johnclineii, don't know about you but I like driving something a little different. Following the heard is not my style. Camcords are for the masses of people don't want to think much about their purchase. One of the reasons I didn't get an Accord.

    Martypa, I wish they had those deals up here. No incentives on the GP here.

    Gunit, I think the GT is very peppy and I just have no need for all the extra power. The fuel economy is better in the GT and no premium needed. I suspect GTPs only make up a small percentage of sales.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Evandro, I added a Thraster Shift Kit for more hard/firm shifts to put less wear on the clutches & an external tranny fluid cooler to my GTP and I also use SYNTHETIC tranny fluid and Oil only. Yes It is possibel to add an intercooler I had it done , but it is not easy, I used a Thrasher Intercooler and to install you have to make mods to the intake manifold, when you are done, the supercharger will sit about 2 inches higher, but there is still enough clearance under the stock hood. You also may have to extend the fuel rails to the injectors. This voids the warranty, but so be it, depends on the dealership you go to...some overlook more easily then others. This costs about $2k, but that is what the $3k rebate was for... ha! Should be able to run a 1/4 in the mid 13's... when I get to test it shortly. Not bad for a total price paid with mods of $26k.

    My 1997 with 58k miles traded in 2002 never had a problem other then oil leaks from the valve cover gaskets. Tranny was fine after mods. Just have to not drive it hard all the time, that is the key.

    Remember the tranny was only designed for 280 ft lbs torque, that is why the series 3 engine only got a horsepower increase and no torque increase, it was a cost cutting measure by GM so they didn't have to redesign the tranny. Tranny can take more then 240hp.. just limited to 280 torque.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    <<<Gunit, I think the GT is very peppy and I just have no need for all the extra power. The fuel economy is better in the GT and no premium needed. I suspect GTPs only make up a small percentage of sales>>>

    Dan165, the GT is very peppy off the line and up to 40mph. But after 40mph, on the highway I felt it to only be so-so... If you are doing 65mph in the GT and put it to the floor there wasn't much acceleration. That is where the supercharger made the difference for me. Yeah that stinks that the GTP needs premium but almost every car I have ever owned has required premium, including my I30t and Aurora, so no big deal. BTW... the GT only gets 2 mpg EPA rated better then the GTP. Not much.

    GTP's made up about around 25% of GP sales. It varied from year to year. So it was rather small.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Early on, there was rumor of a tranny upgrade and then a HP and torque increase, perhaps for 2005. Perhaps they will also drop the Uglycloth (TM acknowleged)
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    I never found the Accord to be dull except for the new sedan and the 01-02 was a little dull. As for everybody driving a Honda the Accord is outsold by the F-150. I guess its accepectable to drive an F-150 because its American Made. I do like Honda Accord's of the 90's but the 03 Accord Sedan Honda dropped the ball. I guess I shouldn't buy a Chevy Trailblazer because its in the Top 10 in sales and one of the most popular SUV's. As for the Camry I would never buy a Camry because it has never been my style. Eveybody says how everybody buys Honda's yet Gm outsells Honda. I don't understand that one. I just think everybody is entitled to their own taste wether they by Ford, Toyota, Honda, or GM. I have always most Toyota's to be bland. Most Toyota's I do find bland but I do repect their enginneering and reliability though.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    carguy : GM sells more cars, but they are different models. Honda only sells one midsize car. That would be the difference.

    gunit : As I've said before, 0-60 is not a priority for most people so long as it's got good power. The 3800 III is the best choice for most people.
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    It's too bad they didn't decide to put the Caddy's tranny on those, which handle up to 305ft.lbs. of torque.

    As for the premium fuel, in the SC Series III engine can tackle regular gas, but one doesn't get all the performance. When the tough gets going, just feed the horses with the good juice. :-)
  • midlifecrisismidlifecrisis Member Posts: 391
    Everyone does have an F-150 and a Trailblazer - that's why I went out and bought something different - a Chevy Avalanche. There isn't anything else like it (except the Caddy sister truck). The Subaru Baja was made to be a mini Avalanche, but it has a slow 4-cylinder engine in it and a totally useless bed.

    My parents have bought nothing buy Toyota Cameras for the past 20 years - all 4 cylinder. Sure they've served them well, but they are in their 70s and the cars look like.....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.................
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Evandro, I read somewhere that you are losing nearly 30 horse if you use regular gas in the SC 3800 3, but 230 is still better then most.. ha!

     I don't know how easy/difficult if at all you can directly bolt the Aurora/Caddy V8 tranny into the GTP?? It is a different engine, 3800 vs Northstar!! Supposedly I have heard of a few people swapping the larger 4.6 Caddy motor in their 1995-1999 Aurora's... That would be nice.

    In my car club a few of the guys with GTPs of '97-'03 vintage have used regular gas on long highway trips with no reported problems. As long as they didn't get on it hard or floor it, they said there was no knock. I wouldn't trust that myself though.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    Why would anyone spend many thousands of dollars on a fine race horse that ran well on beefsteak but feed it week old crackers?
  • midlifecrisismidlifecrisis Member Posts: 391
    Those owners that haven't won any races recently and are broke! :)
  • evandroevandro Member Posts: 1,108
    I don't know about where you live, but premium gas can be found for just $0.10 more than regular, or less than $1.50 down here. I don't really think that $100 more a year would make a hole in my pocket...
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    evandro, I live in upper Bergen county near the GW Bridge/NY. Premium is about $1.50 too, as long as you stay IN NJ. I ONLY use premium 93 in my 2001 I30t and 2002 GTP and prior to that I ONLY used premium 93 in my '95 Aurora and '97 GTP, so I'm used to it. All these cars either require or recommend 91+ in my area there is only 87, 89 or 93. So no big deal.

    I would never try to run regular and run the risk of damaging my engine or decreasing the performance. I know people that run regular in their I35 and claim it runs fine, but I wouldn't take a chance like that...
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Member Posts: 1,203
    Every Accord I can remember has been rather dull looking, the new sedan just went from dull(which isn't always bad) to ugly. Ford F-150s and Chevy Silverados are everywhere as well. Thats why if I were buying a truck it would probably be a GMC Sierra. Much less common. On the SUV, I'd do a GMC Envoy over a Trailblazer for the same reason. Not to mention I think both the Sierra and Envoy are better looking than their siblings.
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    your horse is a carnivore?
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    No. But if it were and performed well eating that way, I sure wouldn't feed it crackers!

    Most horses eat oats. Most cars use regular gas. When you find one that does so much better if you spring for the good stuff, and the horse cost so much to start with, why would you ever go cheap on the fuel?
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    I wouldn't go buy a car just because its less common than another car. That just doesn't seem like smart in buying a car. You like GM and I like Honda and Mazda so we have a little different tastes. As for the Envoy and Trailblazer isn't the Envoy priced over 30 Grand while Trailblazer is priced a little under 30 grand? I will give you though that the Envoy does have a beaufiful exterior design to it.
  • BushwackBushwack Member Posts: 258
    I'd post this question on the Regal forum, but since this forum gets much more traffic and my 2000 GS is a close cousin to the Grand Prix,...

    I put new tires on my car and was told that both tire rods on my car are loose and should be replaced before getting an alignment. With 5 months and 6,000 miles before my warranty expires, I called the local Buick dealer and he was "indecisive" whether this was a warranty issue. I called Buick's 800 number and they too were indecisive but will call me back next week once they gather 'more information'.

    Am I wrong in expecting the tire-rods to be covered/replaced under warranty? Without this correction, indirectly my tires' waranty will be void (not to mention other safety issues). Any input/thoughts on this subject is greatly appreciated.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Bushwack, I had my tie rod ends replaced under WARRANTY on my 1997 GTP back in 2000 at 34,000 miles without even fighting with the dealer. No problem at all. That should be a WARRANTY item. Just like you, my GTP was driving fine, but when I went to get new tires at 34k the tire shop said they were loose. Had the dealer re-verifty and they covered it under warranty 100%, no arguments..

    Someone told me that was a problem with the early W bodies of 1997/1998? Tie rod ends prematurely wearing out/loosening? It happened to me and to you so far... anybody else?
  • orwoodyorwoody Member Posts: 269
    Wow, I miss a few days and it takes an hour to catch up... lots of discussion on dislikes about the 2004 GP and comparisons to other makes....
    Well, do what I do and drop an eMail to Pontiac or GM or Ford or Volvo or.... I'll leave it to you to speculate whether or not they read them or immediately deep six 'em.

    just go here:
    http://www.pontiac.com/

    Click on the Contact Us, then click on eMail. You could even cut and paste your message from this board.
    I have dropped them a list of my dislikes; things like interior color choices, the "cloth" pattern, NO auto climate control - I think dual is worthless; uncomfortable seats, cheap looking PW/PDL toggles, cheap looking vent louvers, No auto dim rear view mirror... some of the reasons I went for a greatly discounted 2003 GP rather than the 2004. They sent me an acknowledgment back... time will tell as the changes roll out next few model years. After all Lute does admit they are not there yet when compared to some of the competition... I think they'd be excited to hear from prospective customers.
  • johnclineiijohnclineii Member Posts: 2,287
    I have no intention of venting to Pontiac.

    Instead, I will be buying my first non-GM car in many, many years when the hatchback and wagon Mazda6's come out.

    THAT will be my feedback.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    Orwoody, the '97-'00 GP had auto/digital dual climate control as an option, then Pontiac took it away for 2001 and replaced it with the manual one. Yeah it is pretty useless. The '97-'03 have the auto dimming rear view mirror. I only buy leather in my cars, I never like the cloth pattern's. The reason I will not buy the '04 GP is NO MORE COUPE. That killed it for me. That's why I bought my '02 GTP COUPE for $22k loaded/greatly discounted leftover in Sept. 02.

    Never buy a 1st year GM car, usually the 2nd or 3rd year has improvements and more features/options. I know from experience with having to be the 1st one on the block to have a '95 Aurora and '97 GTP when they first came out as all new models. The longer you wait the better chance of getting good rebates/ better deals.

    The '03 GTP was $4k cheaper due to rebates then the '04 GTP, I don't see $4k worth of improvements in the '04, it was wiser to buy the '03. Plus in my opinion, the '97-'03 looked better then the '04 GP. They are the same sized car.

    It wasn't like back in 1997, the '96 was smaller and uglier with too much cladding.
  • gunitgunit Member Posts: 469
    One final thought, why hasn't GM increased the regular 3800 power at all? It's been the same 200 horse rating since 1997 !! Meanwhile the competition has signifigantly increased its power !! Even the GTP only added 20 horse.

    Back in 1997 a GT made 200 horse and a max made 190 horse. Today in 2004, the GT is still the same 200 horse and the max is now 265. That was an exclusive advantage to the GP back then, more power. Not anymore.

    The competition for the GP has signifigantly increased power since 1997, while the GP has remained the same? WHy?

    I think it's tranny issues, saving money by using the same one, which is quite a good tranny, but the competition is now going to 5 spd automatics which would do wonders for the already fast GTP.

    Basically any new 2004 GP buyers, except GTP buyers are still stuck in 1997, power wise...
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    Maybe thats why they were able to come out with the 3.6L DOHC going into the CTS and its smaller variants so quickly ;-).
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    The exterior was was like a decade old when GM decided to finally put the 97 GP out. The Grand Prix exterior (88-96 period) was still relevant from 1988- to about 1994. By 95 there was already a New Maxima out and a new accord came out for the 94 model year at that time. That GP(88-96) was kinda dated compared to the competition at that time circa 1995. GM even put out a new Grand AM for the 92 model year. I wonder why GM waited basically a decade to come out with a new GP design. There was a refresh for the GP in between the 91 and 92 model years: the front grille got changed up a bit, and I think more cladding got put on maybe. That generation of GP was one of the better looking cars of the late 80's/early 90's I would say.
  • richm4richm4 Member Posts: 169
    The GP's 4 speed tranny is fine by me. Lexus pissed off many if its customers and lost new customers (i.e. me) with its oft-maligned and dangerous new 5 speed tranny that debutted in the 02 ES300.
  • ruskiruski Member Posts: 1,566
    my 2002 Acura TL-S' tranny blew at 6,100 miles

    I'd rather have my GTP's 4-speed that never skipped a beat.
  • carguy58carguy58 Member Posts: 2,303
    The Camry has a good rating for the Tranny. The ES300 I have heard stories about. A tranny blowing is very un-Toyota like. Honda's auto tranny over the years have had their bugs in the Accord. The Tranny in the Civic always seems fine.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.