Older Honda Accords

1378379381383384389

Comments

  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Yes, reviewers have commented that the transmission is always in the right gear. My V6 transmission downshifts quickly, usually before I get the pedal down very far. It downshifts quicker than you can push in the clutch, and change gears yourself with a stick. With a stick, I find you have to be prepared ahead of time. Yes, I own a manual too. maybe your tranny needs some adjustment.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Just wrote a multi page review of my new Accord and my computer crashed before I hit post - argh.

    Maybe I will do something long later, but to quickly sum it up.

    2007 SE I4 MT

    I took an 800 mile business trip and found the car to drive and handle beautifully - the engine is a jewel. With the manual there is plenty of power and I even forgot to upshift a few times (until I looked at the tach) because the engine is so smooth. I can't imagine any situation where I would need a 6 cyliner.

    On the bad side. The seats felt fine during numerous test drives of 15 -20 minutes, but during a long trip they are horrible. I have never had back pain after driving a car (and I have driven plenty with bad seats), but After an hour in the Accord my lower back was killing me. I do not have chronic problems either - I can sit in the all wood pews at church for over an hour without any pain. Back still hurts today and just the thought of getting in the car to drive it is unappealing.

    I think the seats are too soft and have no lumbar. My old Integra has steel springs in the seat, and these seem to be all foam, so there is no real support. Ironiclly the smaller Integra has wider seats. The bolsters on the Accord are so narrow and stiff that the seat feels concave from left to right. Also ironic is that my wife said the seats were not too comfortable during the test drives and I thought they were fine.

    Very frustrating. Trying to see if I can add the lumbar mechanism from an EX. Maybe that will help. I probably would have bought an EX-L with the better adjustment for the seats, but it just did not have enough headroom with the sunroof.

    Already wondering why I didn't save $3,000 and get a new Mazda6 with power seats (more adjustability) and lumbar support.

    So much to like about the car, but 1 thing like this sure changes the experience.

    I have read people complain about the comfort of various different seats and thought the people were just being too picky. Strange to be on the other side now.
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    Sorry to hear about your comfort... or lack thereof. I find the seats to be quite comfortable on long trips, but I do have the EX-L. The sunroof does cut down on the headroom though. But I love sunroofs. :shades:
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Sorry re the discomfort. The main reason I buy the EX is to get the lumbar support. It can't cost that much more money, they should use it on more models and just raise the cost of the car.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    See if an upholstery shop can add some foam to the lower part of the seat back. I would think they could do so. Or you can buy some Recaro seats. :shades:

    I could have got $5K on the Mazda6 in stock at the local dealership. They are just not selling. I bought a car which was not popular before and I must say they stay that way come resale time.

    Will let ya know when I take a long trip. I did do a run to Santa Barbara one day and put say 110 miles or so each way without any back problem. I have a bad - bad back. Everyone is built different, so the support is not hitting you right. Lumbar support, in some cases work, and in other cases it hits me too high to work. So adjustable may not be any better. I own the SE V6.

    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    The dealership may also help by replacing your seats with the lumbar one, for a fee of course. They also can direct you to a shop to add the foam.
    Loren
  • ichpokhudezhichpokhudezh Member Posts: 12
    Too bad about the seat discomfort.
    I find the seat shape to be nearly ideal for everyday use (besides the fact that you cannot have anything in the rear pockets of your pants). The seats don't have tilt adjustment in my LX; which is a pity but not a deal-breaker for an automatic.
    I don't have any major back problems and find the seats to be ok for 5-hour long drives (and I commute for 1.5-2 hours every work day).

    I saw aftermarket inflatable lumbar supports on the web - you might be able to find a shop that will install one for you.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Thanks for the ideas.

    I am hoping I can adjust the seat somehow. It seems like you can just pull off the panel behind the seat, so maybe there is a simple way to modify the seat. No such thing as an uphostry shop in this town - maybe somewhere in the state I will have to check. Keep in mind that SD has about the same number of people as the Akron Ohio metro area - not too many, so not too many services.

    Adding a new seat would probably be the best - I wonder if an EX-L seat would work (I will see if there is a wiring harness under the seat). The extra adjustability of the power seat can only help. Unfortunately I fear I will probably get next to nothing for my 5 day old seat, while a new seat will cost a large sum. Hopefully I am wrong.

    I also notice while "walking" back from lunch, and peeking in some EX-Ls that I went by, that the side bolsters on the leather seats are not as severe. The cloth bolsters go straight up for about an inch (and there is a gap between the seat and the bolster) then start angling off to the side. The leather bolsters start to angle off right away, and have no gap - this smoother transition might make things a little better. More like my Integra and most other cars.

    I suppose I could go the Recaro route, but I have no idea where I could sit in one, and after this I want to be darn sure a seat is cozy before I buy it.

    Who knows my back may adjust to the seat somehow - it hasn't yet. There are two basic problems. First, when I just get seated and relax my lower back I can just feel it sinking an inch or two into the seat, and never really reaching something nice and hard to support it. I think my back does not trust this sensation and instinctively stays tensed - resulting in muscle pain after a while. I think it is made worse because the very top of the seat where my shoulders hit is quite soft, so my upper back is not too stable either, and the lower back has to try and keep in steady.

    Anyway, I will just try to make lemonade and hopefully wind up with a superior seat
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Long shot. Go back to the dealer and see what kind of deal he will give you on an EX w/ the lumbar support. You will get some of the incremental cost back when you sell/trade the ex model over the LX. It may not cost that much more than some of the other solutions. Hope this helps.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Just called Honda.

    You can buy the parts for the lumbar from the EX, but they don't guarantee they will fit an SE. The cost for the parts is pushing $400. Worth it if it transforms the seats. I will need to spend some time in an EX to see. Wish I knew somebody that owned one.

    I could also buy an EX seat frame with the lumbar built in and have my seat covers transferred. That way I know the mechanism will work. Frame is $642 plus the cost at an upholstry shop.

    They don't sell entire seats, and don't deal with your old seats. He did say he priced a Civic SI seat for a guy part by part once, and it came out to $1,500 per seat.

    Anybody have an EX or EX-L and want to trade for some nearly new SE seats. ;) I would pay the difference.

    Blufz1 - I suppose I could trade it back, but the headroom issue with the sunroof reappears (although in hindsight this is quite minor as my head just barely grazes the roof, and over the course of a long drive I would probably "settle" in a little.) The thing is the nearest EX or EX-L with a stick shift is about 400 miles away.

    I think I will stary by trying to modify the seat somehow. If I come up with a good solution I will post, so others can benefit.

    My preference for stick shifts is really getting to be a pain (no pun). My wife wanted a Camry (because of the available Stability control) that had power seats and lumbar, but they just don't make any sticks.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Adding foam should not cost more than a couple hundred, or so, I would think. The Recaro seats, I would think may be available to try out at the shop which sells them. See if there is a larger car upholstery shop in your area. Contact Recaro or another supplier of seat via the Net.

    Loren
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Maybe your dealer could trade and get the 400 mile distant one for you.
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    You might even try one of those lower back cushions for car seats. That would be a very cheap fix.
  • redsfan1redsfan1 Member Posts: 58
    Hello All,
    I just got my new accord. I am thinking about adding on a lip spoiler or a wing. The dealer is supposed to send a book of coupons in the next few weeks as part of the package of getting the car. I guess I maybe should have negotiated in my price a lip spoiler or a wing? They said there would be coupons for accessories in the book and they said they would help me out on a deal if I decided I wanted that. I am just kind of regretting not getting that added in. I was wondering if any of you added either to your car. I would like for my accord to look at little sportier. I have the graphite pearl colored sedan.

    I saw one at the dealership with a wing and it looked pretty sporty-first time I had seen that. Anyway, I was just wondering if anyone had any pictures of their car with this OR hand any feedback about what they have seen on the accords. Thanks!
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    I'm sure they have pictures of them on this website. http://www.handa-accessories.com/accext06.html
    I have bought from this site before. The shipping on something as large as a lip or spoiler would be pretty high though, I imagine.
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    I think you should leave the car stock. The add ons just cheapen the look imo.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    I think the factory accessories look pretty good, because they actually match up with the car. My car had the spoiler, tinted windows, and mud guards on it when I bought it new. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion.
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Sure. Maybe he needs the down force. :)
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Riiiiight, since the wing has zero affect on downforce :) :P
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    If you like the look, then go for it! Personally, after looking at the lip and wing, I can to the conclusion it looks better IMHO without any add-ons. Take a look at the shaping done on the trunk, and how the third light area is worked into the styling, then look at the same area covered by the wind or altered by the lip, and you may see it as I do -- a cover-up or a distraction from the flow lines of the original design. For more sporty, I would say the Civic Coupe. I spent some time trying to decide between the Accord Coupe and the Sedan, but finally went with the SE sedan. It had the right package I wanted, the V6, seats which seemed to fit my a little better, and a couple more doors for easy entry of friends. I did like the coupe look though. The most sporty is the Civic Coupe. But the overall package of the SE, and the simple elegant lines, which I think will hold up over time looks wise, won me over. I have never owned a car with a spoiler or a wing. If I get a Mustang or some other sports car for weekend driving, I may end up with a spoiler some day. On the Accord, it looks like it is trying a bit hard to be something other than a nicely styled, great handling, could even say touring class of car. A great and fun car it is, while being a sedan with an automatic transmission. A track or sports car, it is not.

    If you really like the looks though, I would do it. Like I said, lip spoiler or wind is something I have not owned, yet would be kinda cool to have on a car some day. In looking at the Accord, I am not sure it is IMHO only the right car for that look. If I had a 2004 Mustang GT say, I would like it on that car. And on an Audi TT it became a necessity do to its aerodynamics at Autobahn speeds. I don't have that problem though. Anyway, if you add a spoiler, chrome, paint scheme or whatever and love it, it is right for you. Don't let anyone change your mind on this, as it is for your driving pleasure.

    Enjoy the ride, Loren
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    With the recent emergence of more "sporty" sedans, the difference between coupes, and sedans, is merely the number of doors. The spoiler on a Mustang is doing the exact same thing the spoiler on an Accord sedan is doing. Adding an element of "sportyness" to it. The spoiler on either car, has absolutely no aerodynamic significance. They are for "Looks" only. Of course opinions are like (insert your own word here), everybody has one, and they all stink.
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    I don't want a bunch of holes drilled into my car for any non functional purpose.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Well, I guess my advise to you (blufz1), is to not get yourself a spoiler. :confuse: Some people don't like my window visors either, yet it seems to have no effect on me, and what I like. :)
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    I was considering a hood scoop and some fins. :)
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Well if it was your car, of course you would not want a spoiler. It happens to be for someone's car that likes the look of the spoiler. Since he bought the car with his money, and not your money, I can not see how it will effect your life in any way. If he want to put rabbit ears on the car, and curb feelers, I say more power to him. I happen to like the spoiler on a Mustang, though they also look good without them. I also prefer the pre-replicar era car. It is all a matter of preference. I don't add tint to windows, though some can not live without it. Can not imagine why it matters to someone else what the other person likes in their autos.
    Loren
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    For you? Oh the car.... :D

    Loren
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    To me, that would be going overboard. But hey, whatever floats your boat.
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    Funny :)

    I added the little lip 'spoiler' and like it well enough. Obviously it's all personal preference but to me the lip thing looks like part of the car and just makes it look a little more like a 'sport sedan' (it is v6 m6!) and less like a family sedan (til you look inside and see the baby seat...). The wing spoiler just gets a little too close to the 'fast and the furious' for me.
    Enjoy your car, it's a winner!
  • ichpokhudezhichpokhudezh Member Posts: 12
    The heavier the wing is the greater downforce improvement you'll see.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Some people think a spoiler on a Mustang is ok, but not on an Accord sedan. My niece has a Mustang with a V6 engine, and my Accord can easily run circles around that car. So which car is more sporty?
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Yes, I would like the respond to that.

    What?

    Loren
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    To me a Mustang with a V6 just doesn't make sense. A sports car, with no performance, is like a bar-b-cue with no sauce. My point was, I would consider my Accord more of a sports car (based on performance), than a Mustang with a V6 engine.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Current models: The Accord V6 0-60 with an automatic is around 6.6 seconds. A Mustang V6 0-60 is around 6.9 seconds.

    The Accord sedan or coupe have double wishbone suspension front and rear and will perform better under uneven road pavement. The Accord has a very smooth V6 and get great gas mileage. My car is new and I am already getting around 27.5 MPG on highway travel, which included some climbing. The car handles like a sports car. Ride is pleasant while still letting the driver know what is going on. The interior is well done.

    The Mustang, to answer your question is the more sporty of the two. Sporty however has a couple meaning to it. It is sporty in both ways. The current Mustang, which is also referred to as a pony car, is fun to drive, fairly quick, and looks like a sporty car, a sports car, and a pony car. The engine is more course than a Honda, and more fitting of SUV. The gas mileage is not so good. Handling is good, but I would not trust it under as many a road condition as I would the Accord. It lacks stability control, and the rear suspension is still solid -- though a much improved one. The car handles like a pony car, with sporting intentions. It is good looking, though IMHO is too much a lean towards what I coined as the replicar look. Interior looks cheap. But then again, sporty can mean cheap, or not too serious, as well as, fast and playful. It is not a bad car over all. I would get a 2004, or maybe even some much older one, if joining a club. The GT has the sound and power I like, but if someone buys a V6, I can see a couple advantages, which are aside of performance. Gas mileage a little better, with a less expensive to repair engine, and the insurance is lower. And lastly they look good with a spoiler or without one.

    In today's world, the cars like the Accord V6 SE, which I bought, come so close to being a sports sedan-GT, while providing an easier to live with ride and entry/exit than a true sports car, I would only buy a sports car like a Stang or Vette for special driving, or club events.

    As far as power defining what is a sports car, that is not true. Plenty of lower powered cars are sports cars. It may have a good power to weight ratio, while not having a lot of HP. And a sporty car may not even be a sports car.
    Loren :shades:
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    My niece's Mustang is an 03 or 04 (anniversary edition) convertible. I guess it's more for looks than performance, because the performance is dreadful, and not much fun to drive because the convertible has a lot of body flex.
  • bamaflumbamaflum Member Posts: 39
    I can attest that the Accord is very sporty to drive even with the I4 paired with the manual transmission.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    "Well I guess not. It's four foot by five foot and I'm looking right at it!" (roughly quoted... :P )
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    A reporter with a national newspaper is hoping to talk to Honda owners who researched safety ratings before making their purchase. Please reply to ctalati@edmunds.com no later than Thursday, March 29, 2007 with your daytime contact info.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    I went on a 125 mile drive the other day and placed a couple of folded hand towels in appropriate places - one under my knees and one in the lumbar area. It made a huge difference - not only did my back not hurt after driving, it actually felt better than it did before I started (it was still hurting from my 800+ mile trip 2 days before).

    I have since opened up the back of the drivers seat (it pops right out - but be carefull not to break the upper anchors) and placed 2" of foam in front of the lowest back spring. The foam compressed too much, so I then added a piece of sturdy cardboard between the spring and the foam to keep the spring from digging in (did not want something too firm that I could feel and the cardboard seems to work well).

    Placed the cover on the back and you can't tell the difference - except the seat has a noticeable bump in the lumbar area. I have yet to try it on a long trip - it may need a little fine tuning.

    If I open it up again for adjustments I will take some pictures.

    I have not added anything permanent under the knees yet, but it looks just as easy. The seat cover is only held on the front by some plastic clips. Seems like a simple matter to pop off the clips (I tried a few) peel back the seat cover a little and place a nice tapered piece of stiff foam towards the front of the seat. I am waiting on this until I can get a nice professionally cut piece of foam so the seat still looks OEM.
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    Wow... nice job solving your seat problem. Much cheaper than buying a new seat!
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    Thanks for the info!
    So far my seat is fine, but if I need to alter it, I know it should be easy enough.
    The car upholstery shops do alterations too.
    Loren
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    Happy you got your problem addressed so easily.
  • bristol2bristol2 Member Posts: 736
    Sounds like you have an after-market business in the making!
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    "Sounds like you have an after-market business in the "making!"

    Yea send in those seats - I'll fix em up. ;)

    Took a 200 mile drive today - no problems with the seat. Gas mileage was a little dissapointing 31.5, especially since I was going slow (lots of rain only averaging about 62 mph). Of course the deep puddles on the road add resistance as did the strong winds and having the defroster/AC on most of the time. Next week I have to go on a 510 mile round trip - hopefully the weather will cooperate. I want my mpg in the high 30's - 40 when broken in and driven gently.
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    Yup, rain, wind, and the AC (defroster in this case) will kill ya.

    But at least you were comfortable!!
  • blufz1blufz1 Member Posts: 2,045
    I bet you can't get 40 mpg on a properly, mechanically computed tank. Friendly challenge. :)
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Having done it twice in the 18k miles I've had my 2006 Accord, I'll bet he can, if he can keep speeds at low 70s or below, with minimal A/C usage, light weight, and only moderate hills. (I have a 2006 EX Auto, cloth)

    With any kind of passing, downshifting, or speed above 72 or so, my mileage has always dropped into the upper 30s. At 72 MPH, with just me in the car, 60 degrees, and not so much as the torque converter unlocking once merging on the interstate, I've seen as high as 40.92 MPG. Only two tanks in its life though, as it is difficult to do. Anybody should hit upper 30s (36-38) when driven modestly on strictly highway.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Some posts were moved to a discussion where they are better placed. Here's the link: dudleyr, "Honda Accord Tires and Wheels" #156, 30 Mar 2007 1:56 pm. Let's continue there.
  • jmr237jmr237 Member Posts: 9
    The 2007 Accord SE 4 cylinder has carbon fiber interior accents ... does anyone know the color of the interior accents on the SE V6?
  • rbarbotrbarbot Member Posts: 19
    Help-

    I got our EX-V6 last week and am loving the car so far. However, a couple days ago I started hearing a rattle from the steering area. I started to hunt it down and determined that it is either something under the horn cover on the steering wheel or the plastic trim cover itself. If I put some pressure on the plast by pulling OUT on the cover, the rattle is STOPPED.

    I don't see how it can be tightened. Maybe it needs a new trim piece.

    THe car seems tight other than that. Can I expect more rattles inside the car? Are there any common ailments or fixes that I may use in the future?

    Thanks for any help.
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    The nice thing about new cars is that you don't really have to hunt down rattles... just take the car back to the dealer and have them fix it under warranty. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.