By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Generality: in a highly competitive market for Asian makes [Southern Calif, for example], a price of a few hundred over nominal invoice is not an unreasonable expectation, at least in a few weeks. In less competitive areas, forget about it. Nissan and Toyota have actually had the perverse effect of propping up prices, at least in the very short term, by the elevated MSRPs on the new Altima and Camry. The Camry will support these prices...the Altima will not...but it will take a few months for the marketplace to have the desired effect. In the meantime, it's between you and your local market...
i know i know, a lot of questions..but im thinking of buying within a month or 2
(anyone want to buy a 97 grand cherokee)...
It's always ended up being about $2K above a similarly equipped Accord the last 2 times I've checked: in '97 and this month...
I've seen mostly 2002 SE's and EX-V6's in Oklahoma, but no LX's yet. I test drove the 2002 SE and it's a nice car, but I don't like sunroofs. Will wait for the LX's to come in before I try and deal.
Also drove the 2002 Camry LE 4cyl. Whisper quiet inside! However, the dealer will only take $800 off the sticker. I estimate that's about $1369 over invoice. The bad thing about Toyota's is all the port-installed options like paint/fabric protection, pinstripes, etc. The Camry had $1400 in port-installed options! Haven't seen any 2002 Altimas in Oklahoma yet...
~alpha01
Real world Sstreet prices matter more than MSRP.
;^)
See this.
Anybody have a fix on how much above invoice one should expect in a small & hot regional market?? (upstate NY)
Kelly Blue book (kbb.com) indicates an invoice price for the 2001 of about 18,100.
If I can get a 2002 for the same 18,700 is that good? Or should I hold out for closer to 18,100 or go farther afield?
I note as well that other services show different invoice prices!
As far as the Altima goes, sure it starts at 23K for the SE V6, but without options, it has NOTHING compared to the Accord EX V6. Everything from ABS, Auto climate ctrl, leather, moonroof, 6-CD changer, and side airbags are all options that push the price up another 4 or 5 grand, plus all these things are included on the base price of the Accord EX V6. The only thing the Altima has going for it is that 240hp engine, but I'd much rather spend a bit more to get a Maxima or an Acura CL/TL. Its absolutely puzzling what Nissan was thinking on this one.
They will not go for much less than that until the last of the 2001s are gone or no one would buy the 2001s and the dealers need to move the 2001s out now.
When all the 2001s are gone, it is likely the 2002s will soon be discounted as much as the 2001s are now plus the $200 price increase.
be easier to park, but the interior feels cramped. It is almost the same dimensions
as my 86 Accord but feels much tighter inside. The 2001 Accord has the advantage
of interior roominess and many more places inside to put stuff, plus the added trunk
room, but it is 11" longer than my 86 and I'm afraid of the parking dilemmas and after-market cruise is iffy.
Best price I've gotten locally on the Civic is $14,790, but the same dealer quoted me
$15,990 for the demonstrator 2001 Accords they still had on the lot, both with 3800
to 5700 miles on them. This is $500 more than the same dealer was advertising for
the same car--new--four weeks ago, so it makes me suspicious of the Civic pricing
too. I don't want to pay a premium for a car that has half a year's mileage on it
already and may be discounted just as much next year. A dealer 40 miles away has 5 new 2001 VPs still listed on their website, so I might be able to get one there, though I'm still getting a car that is a "year" old because of the year change.
My two questions are: Civic or Accord? Buy now or wait and see what discounts will
be available on the 2002s?
Thanks for any insight.
I am trying to get statistical data that in what probability a recent Honda Accord EX would have problem requiring using this warranty. If not that big, the extended warranty may be not so worthy. I have 60 days to cancel this contract.
Does anyone have some pointers on this issue?
Thanks.
$1450 is outragous and you probably could just skip it completely.
Buying it for around 800/900 for EX-L is a good expenditure, would increase value of the car if you sell it after 3-4 years & the new buyre would be more than wiling to play for it (devide the cost by the years remaining on the warranty)
Also look for a new emphasis from Honda on noise; road and tire noise has been an historic weak spot of all Hondas [including Acura], but as each new model is released, you can see their emphasis on fixing this weakness. The Odyssey gets the treatment this year, the initial drives of the CR-V show this is also the case with it. If they can get a handle on this aspect of the way the car drives, the last advantage that Toyota has had over the years will pretty much go away.
the honda does handle better-- not close here either.
The extended warranty does not raise the re-sale value of the car. You buy the warranty to give yourself peace of mind. It does give you ammunition to charge about $1000-$1500 over trade-in value. But you can never sell for the same price as the dealer.
The V6 Accord was not noisy.
Good interactive site.
Thanks
Thanks.
Thanks in advance!
currygoat
Manual - Retail $18,890 | Invoice $17,005.20
http://www.collegehillshonda.com/2002.htm
twist
currygoat
Just curious...
The figure of 17005 is less than the 2001 and way off my estimate of what it should be. Or maybe I'm just off somewhere.
currygoat
The collegehillshonda.com 2002 invoice I cited did not include the destination charge. I think maybe the 2001 Edmunds invoice you're citing included the dest charge.
Hope this helps.
twist
currygoat