Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Have anyone try to fit a KN-airfilter to a V6 Tucson?
This may improve the milage!
Does anyone know?
BR hebe
It may void your warranty however....
Are you sure it's the radio reception? Mine had horrible speakers so I had a radio store install better ones.
I get 28 mpg on my 2005 LX I have 2,300 miles on it.
>post and take your heel and press down firmly. There will
>be a snap and it is locked into place.
I did that, but without using my heel... instead used my hand. Will try tomorrow! Thanks.
I've read that the headlights could be brighter and go further.
Can anyone recommend an HID light conversion? Are they safe? any other suggestions?
Thanks.
rablaw
I just found one recall from Edmunds.com and my Tucson affected.
Made appointment will work on it Wed.
The recall no: 05V315000.
Is anyone complete this recall? <img src=" :confuse:
I am looking to buy my first vehicle. I am 29 a teacher and I live in Toronto canada. I am interested in a small suv like the tucson or crv. I used to drive a durango but it is way to big for a single person. The winters can be an issue here and I want something that I can drive through snow in. A compact SUV or simiar vehicle would be nice. I like the way the tucson looks compared to the crv but I also like the x3 (athough it is pricey). I also want a vehicle that is not to outrageous in terms of gas prices. Please advise I want to but in the next two weeks. Keep in mind that I am in Canada.
Thanks.
I live in Orangeville, and would encourage you to look into the Kia Sportage 2005. I bought one in Feb. at 401/Dixie Kia. Had the two minor recalls done on it, (nothing I noticed) and was treated like gold at the dealership. It has a slightly different ride than the Tucson. I prefer the interior of my Kia to the Tucson's.
It's a real solid vehicle to drive. Especially through snow. I didn't bother with 4 wheel drive. I just have the front wheel drive with good snow tires and that little SUV just plowed up the hills around here, leaving other bigger SUVs behind.
I now have 12 000 km on it, and it's going great.
Have a look. I'd be interested to know what you think.
I'm embarrassed at this point, because it sounds like there is something obvious that I'm not seeing regarding how to do this. The may only had a rivet. It's nice and smooth. The capet has a grey things something fastened into it. The grey thing looks like a tiny top hat (the flat part flush with the flat carper and a cylinder pointing upward. I put the mat rivet over the cylinder part. Then what? Am I supposed to break the cylinder part of the top hat in some way? What actually causes the smooth rivet to get fastened to the mat? Sorry for all the duh'ing
You mentioned gas prices: I'm not convinced the Tucson gets the best mileage, but I'm not convinced the other choices are that much better when all is said and done.
What IYO defines "good snow tires"
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has released results of the 35-mph full-frontal crash test. Both driver and front-seat passenger dummies recorded measures consistent with "five-star" crashworthiness ratings. The test vehicle was a 2006 model, but the scores also apply to 2005 model-year Tucsons [Source.] The 38.5-mph side-impact results and rollover-resistance ratings should be released shortly.
Mike
So, I used to just use all-seasons until I ended up in a ditch with my 10 year old Plymouth Voyager.
Now with my new Sportage, it's either Gislaveds (me) or Nokian Hakkapeliittas (husband's vehicle). Used both. Both are Scandanavian, I think, tested on ice.
All I know is they stick like gum to our roads, and have pulled me up many a hill when other SUVs were left spinning their tires.
So, I used to just use all-seasons until I ended up in a ditch with my 10 year old Plymouth Voyager.
Now with my new Sportage, it's either Gislaveds (me) or Nokian Hakkapeliittas (husband's vehicle). Used both. Both are Scandanavian, I think, tested on ice.
All I know is they stick like gum to our roads, and have pulled me up many a hill when other SUVs were left spinning their tires.
'Course it's hard to think of snow now when it's been 30 degrees celsius!
Just delete one, guys, ok?
http://www.edmunds.com/maintenance/MaintenanceServlet
If you want to save gas, stay away from the 6 cyl. as well.
We are very satisfied with the Tucson and I'm sure the Sportage is just as good.
Also, does this mean we can get discount on our Tuscon insurance? I was very disappointed that it's higher that the rates for my Chevy Blazers.
Here in New York City, that's how may accidents and near accidents occur, so in some cases that "it" can be significant.
Also, now that it snows here again in recent years, that dead stop is also prohibitive in folks getting out of parking spots. From my 2nd floor window, I watched storm after storm while all the neighbors spent hours and hours digging and digging. But with my 4WD Blazers, not only could I get out of spots in seconds, even plowed in ones, but I could maintain them simply by leaving the spot and reparking with seconds during the storm, even bad ones and lessening the plowed in'ness too to boot. I'm expecting the same from my 4WD Tucson this winter. Technical note: I don't attribute the whole thing to 4WD vs non-4WD, but it was helpful in the situations I needed it for.
Chevrolet Equinox | Pontiac Torrent
Honda CR-V
Honda Element
Saturn Vue
Subaru Forester
The Chevy, Pontiac, and Saturn all tipped-up on two wheels during the dynamic stability test, and the Honda Element has a "Safety Concern" for serious head trauma to the rear-seat passenger during the side-impact test. The Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester have performed well overall in all crashworthiness assessments - including the more realistic tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). The Tucson has yet to be tested by the Institute.
"Also, does this mean we can get discount on our Tuscon insurance?"
I honestly don't know how it works - I suppose it may be possible. :confuse:
"I was very disappointed that it's higher that the rates for my Chevy Blazers."
Oh, wow - that's very strange indeed! In fact, it doesn't make any logical sense to me at all. The Blazer has traditionally had a high death-rate, and crashworthiness is... well, maybe you should just check this out.
Mike
Keep them coming!
Steve, Host
Just a few questions can you reply tonight or by tomorrow early.
I am planning on getting a Tucson GLS AWD in warm silver 2005. I have added a bunch of options like the Fromt bumper guard, rear bumper guard, rear spoiler, front and rear mud flaps, side visors, cargo mat, rubber mats, shrome side steps and complete hitch.
I have an out the door price of $35100. with all taxes (canadian)
but they are charging freight and pdi of $1295 and Gas tax of $200. I think the those two munbers are too much. When I questioned he said the gas tax was a government tax (but I had asked around and was told $75) he said it was for a different model. Also I know the invoice on the freight is $800. Should pdi be $500 or can I negotiate it some more. Originally they wanted to charge 1495 but I sadi no so they said 1295. Please let me know ASAP as I am going in to sign papers tomorrow (saturday) morning and it will be my last chance to mention anything.
Thanks so much for your help.
Ruby
As to freight charge, you should be able to get that waived and cut drastically if you try hard enough, at least it seems you can do so in the US.
I don't know about the gas tax since I'm in New York.
IMO, any PDI (pre delivery inspection) fee is a complete joke and I would "negotiate that to zero". Ditto for any advertising fee they may be charging you.
Remember that the invoice is a misrepresentation of what your dealer is paying and not paying and getting and not getting when the deal is all checked and balanced and done with between you and them _and_ them and the manufacturer (for instance, the manufacturer gives your dealer different monies, etc, independent of the raw invoice). So if the dealer shows you the invoice and says something like that they can't make money by going lower that the number on the invoice, it's not true. Of course, that doesn't mean they will go lower, but that's part of the give and take you'll need to get involved in.
Anyway, notwithstanding removing some fees, your raw number is: $35100 - $1295 = $33805
so $33805 - $31418 = $2387. Is that the right tax?
Canadian Car Buying (for Canadian Consumers)
Steve, Host
Ruby
Rust proofing has pretty much fallen out of favor down here, especially since most cars come with a 5 year or better rust perforation warranty. Canadians seem to have always rust proofed or oiled their cars more that we do down in the States, but you likely have salt on the roads longer too. I'd ask my neighbors and maybe read some posts in the Rust Never Sleeps--Questions About Rust Problems discussion.
Enjoy the new ride!
Steve, Host
I bought in 2001 a Santa fe GLS with leather seats. Paid $4K more that the GL at the time. When I traded in, I only got $750 more than the GL.
I paid $1200. transport and prep on my Tucson. Never heard about a gas tax. You should get 0% finance up to 5 years.
V6 AWD, be ready for 13l/100 km fuel consumption; and more during the winter.
OTOH, if I were the dealer/salesperson, I would consider you better off than others having gotten those things, and probably won't budge less on discounting the price on you. That's just me, YMMV.
As to freight/pdi, your dealer may have some legit concerns here if you are not by the port of entry of the car, or however they do it. Notwithstanding that, I do know that at least in many places in the US, that charge freight/pdi, even if on the invoice, can often be lowered/discarded/etc.
Anyway, lowering the price would be great of course, but overpaying you don't want to do (I'm not saying you are, just to be cautious of it).
Sorry!