Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Toyota Prius Software Problems
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I read the article and don't recall anyone stranded as in towed back to the dealer. They had a transmission problem and took the car into the dealership for repair. There is a huge difference between that and driving down the highway at 70+ mph and having your Prius Quit. Then getting to the side of the road without getting killed and calling for a tow truck. Sounds like your Brother in law one of the lucky ones that did not have a defective car. Toyota only claims about 30% defective. So that means 70% of the owners have a reliable car. More winners than losers.
And many of them were likely caused by not having SSC-40A (Electronic-Control-Unit Reprogramming) and LSC-40E (Engine Compartment Seal) done for their Prius. They are required updates to prevent this type of problem.
JOHN
I do not recall receiving any notice about SSC-40A and LSC-40E. Were they TSB's or a part of Safety Recalls?
By the way, I appreciate your numerous and valuable comments on all things Prius.
Thanks,
Knowing 2 friends who are long time owners of Prius help answered many of our concerns. Finding only 2 incidents of close-call with no official reports of major accidents, injuries or fatalities, we feel the risk acceptable. This will be no different than 2 domestic models that served us well into 210K-mile range after 1 had a dramatic timing belt shredding incident on a freeway and the other had a complete transmission failure on the interstate.
In the end, it is just personal needs and preferences and decisions. Toyota seems to be acting more publicly now to address the software concerns and we are cautiously optimistic that the latest upgrade fixes the problem. May be they should consider a certain X O/S rather than a certain funny-name O/S that attracts viruses and the blue screen of death
now that we have beaten this particular topic to death, on with more new problems and bugs if any, hopefully not........
so - my real question is How do I tell if my car needs to have the software upgrade. I'm assuming that like all software, there is a way somehow to know the version level and if I know the version of the software of my car, then I should be able to find out if I'm vunurable to the problem or not.
Does anyone know the software versions affected and how to know the version installed? I bought my car used, so it is possible the any notification was sent to the prior owner (and subsequently ignored....)
Thanks
Regards,
Bik
According to this Toyota Special Service Campaign SSC 40A, the concern is only with approximately 3,500 model year 2004 vehicles (owners notified January 31, 2004):
http://www.vfaq.net/docs/TSBs/SSC-40A-dealer.pdf
See the second and third items on page 7 of 8 of this EPA site for SSC 40A and SSC 40D for 25,000 model year 2004 vehicles (owners notified May 31, 2004):
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/cert/recall/420b05001.pdf
There is also the related LSC 40E that updates an engine compartment rainwater seal for model year 2004 vehicles built before October 2003.
There are some service bulletins that apply to 2005's, but none that would apply to a complete shutdown.
http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosinsider/0505/18/0auto-185628.htm
"Toyota... accept(ed) they do ha(d) a problem with the Prius programming" back in January and May of 2004. See my post #126 above. This is nothing new, as they resolved the issue with all vehicles that were brought back to dealers for the TSBs over a year ago.
kippy2, "Toyota Prius Software Problems" #105, 16 May 2005 2:29 pm
I've yet to have a single problem with my '04 Prius and am confident that this car is on the right track.
Railroadjames(free-us Prius)
I imagine only a very small percentage of Prius owners frequent Edmund's. According to Toyota there were 23,900 Prius II's affected by the software glitch. I don't consider that a small percentage. My point was not to continue the story once Toyota acknowledged there IS a problem. Some here wanted us to believe it is all fixed. If so why are people still having problems? One poster, less than a week ago with a 9 month old Prius that has been into the dealership 5 times with the same issue. Do you think the dealership was not notified of the TSB's or are there still problems? If the complex hybrid technologies are going to become mainstream as you are hoping, they will have to be as reliable as the average car in their price group. If the problems are all related to the recalls made last year by Toyota, then it sounds like a lack of training at the dealerships.
You have made a MAJOR PRESUMPTION that 2005 Priuses have the software concerns. In your post #138, you linked to kippy2's May 16 post #105 for support of your presumption. As you later acknowledged, kippy2 stated that he has had his vehicle for nine months. That makes his delivery date sometime in August 2004, well before the 2005's were on the road in the US. Since all Priuses are built in Japan and shipped via a long convoluted distribution chain, including a long slow boatride, it is probable that his was manufactured no later than May 2004.
We can all agree that his dealership should have incorporated the software fixes, but it appears that they may have dropped the ball. Yes, local training is the key.
Is there a way to verify via VIN# whether my car needs the software patch?
thanks!
I have made no presumptions. The articles that were posted by many major media sources included the 2005 Prius. This excerpt was in many of the publications:
The complaints include 2004 and some 2005 model year cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has received 13 reports of the engine shutdowns and some vehicle-information sites have posted complaints about the problem.
Some of the malfunctioning Prius cars had to be towed to the shop before they could be restarted. Toyota blames the problem on a software glitch in the sophisticated Prius computer system.
I say this based on the following recent experiences I've had:
We just sold a MINI Cooper (2002) that was as trouble free a car as I have ever had. Nonetheless, according to good ol' Consumer Reports and a few other "published" articles, the MINI is supposedly plagued with a lot of quality control and 'reliability' issues. If one believed what CR said you would never even look at the MINI and yet the car has been noted repeatly as one of the most desirable cars on the market by auto enthusiasts and regular new car buyers. Why the disconnect? Because, while there were some people who had problems due to real quality control problems, there was a lot more smoke blown around about issues that were minor or a result of misuse of the car. The MINI begs to be driven like a sports car but it was not built with all of the sports car strengths and attributes. (Engineering mistakes ? No - Cost savings mandates.) In any case while some owners had real problems (Windshield cracks apparently plagued some owners) in other cases the real problems were the owners.
In this day and age of email and bulletin boards - "Facts" and "Misinformation" alike can be spread quickly and with some very long lasting results.
By all means complain when you need to but, beware of the fact that very public complaints, can have far reaching results - including an affect on the resale value and in planting the seeds of undue concern in all owners minds - not to mention the press. We all have seen in the past couple of years how the press has failed to do their homework on "newsworthy" stories so beware of what you send/post for public consumption. The press is clearly more often concerned more with increasing the number of readers/listeners than fully checking the accuracy of their stories.
When you have a problem that won't go away or the dealer can't/won't fix - elevate your case but do so carefully. Don't bring out the 16" battleship guns to deal with a problem about a problem that might be handled by a call to the BBB and discussing your options with them. In this day and age the overescalation of a problem can actually work against you.l Threat of legal action are likely to force a dealer to call in the lawyers and shut down communications way before such things are warranted. Litigation or talk thereof should be your last resort not the second or third course of action.
We all see the world being changed by the minority groups (Not ethnic here folks) that are most vocal and who drag in a lawyer over the most minor of issues. That sort of act may win that case for them but it also makes things more difficult for the rest of us. Just look at what malpractice insurance rates are doing to health care costs and the availability of good doctors in some areas. The point is choose wisely your battles and the weapons you use to fight those battles. You are not in the fight by yourself others may pay the cost for your mistakes too.
(By the way - we got rid of our MIN for two reasons - Needed a 4 dr car & with our move to NW Arkansas the nearest MINI dealer became over a 3 hr drive away)
Now if I can just figure out how to connect my MP3 Player into the Std Prius Radio system with out using an fm Tranmitter...
Did you read the WSJ article carefully? Here is what Toyota said:
"He and another Toyota spokesman said the auto maker isn't sure if the latest problems associated with 2004 Prius models involve buyers who never got the upgrade or if an altogether different glitch is shutting the car down."
This is the reason we established this forum - to track potential problems. The Prius software is more complex than a normal car. I'm not saying that Toyota hasn't fixed the problems reported so far, but then, Toyota also isn't making that statement either. Considering how complex the software is in such a vehicle, that is a wise move on the part of Toyota...
If I were in the market for a smaller car, I would seriously consider the Prius, so I do not consider it a likely problem, or a "deal breaker" for me. I would be far more worried about the mechanical complexity (including the batteries) later on, after the extended hybrid warranties run out.
Plus, here is another fact to consider. How many Prius were produced last year? Just over 25K of them had this software "glitch". If some 2005 models are showing problems, it would mean that the glitch was introduced during the 2004-2005 model year cycle. Unless Toyota only made 25K Prius last year?
Has anyone come out with a software and cable package to do your own analysis on the Prius? Many have bought the package for the VW TDI. Many VW TDI owners are better at finding problems than the dealerships are. It will probably come about after the warranty on the Prius has run out.
Yes, especially to Virus programmers. Having a car that reprograms via wireless is a stupid security risk...
Is that a wireless port with an antenna? I thought it was a wired socket?
Power-cycled it five times, no luck. Same scenario. Called dealer to get towed, while on hold, in severe frustration I slammed the brake pedal into the floorboards and tried again - EUREKA! It started normally.
Am getting it looked into by the dealer the begining of next week.
Does anyone else have this "symptom"? It appears my usual pressure on the brake is not always sufficient to allow the car to engage - sometimes it requires brute force.
thanks,
Keep us advised - if they update the software, that would be important...
We purchased a 2004 Prius in Spring, 2004. After a few weeks, the car died and I was told that there had been a recall and the console was changed. The car did very well.....and then about two weeks ago ( year later), while driving, the car died again. I was fortunate to be able to turn to a side street and park. I was not able to turn off the car and it had to be towed.
The first time I had to rent a car and I then changed dealers.....and with the current dealer (who has given excellent service) there was no rental, tho one day of a rental was covered. This in no way makes up for the three hours of waiting and being unable to keep appointments and then having to pick up the car the next morning. (For the first event, the car was in the shop for a week.)
Can we be certain that the dealer(s) notify Toyota to correct the problem? Might be a little adjustment and reprogramming to the service department, but they are not behind the wheel when it happens! We have loved this car, but this is both disappointing and dangerous. Thanks.
We'd like to know what you actually saw for messages on the dashboard and what the dealer reported for error codes.
It seems to be boiling down to some dealers not telling you some updates are required, since the fix was already available... which is the very reason Toyota chose to rollout the Classic model in very modest quantities. It takes a very long time for the mechanics/managers (as with anyone) to get familiar with the new technology. They don't have answers readily available as with the traditional vehicles. Thankfully, that doesn't apply to all of them. Some are up-to-speed now.
JOHN
Regulators plan to conduct investigation over engine stalling.
http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/01/Autos/toyota_prius/
I just perused the NHTSB complaint database. Here are the numbers as I see them for complaints of the Prius suddenly stopping / stalling.
Year / Total / Non-duplicates
2004 / 39 / 24
2005 / 10 / 5
Total: / 49 / 29
So the news reports of 33 are within reason. What I find very troubling is that some owners were told there were two software fixes for the Prius. I had only previously heard of a single fix. And I did not realize that some 2005 model year problems have been reported. Plus, these 2005 Prius problems were reported as late as mid May, 2005, indicating they are not early model 2005's.
This issue is by far the majority of the problems reported (73 total Prius problems reported).
If the car was towed and given the TSB update, then it fails again that is not really a duplicate. That may be why so many reports.
So that tells me that not ALL the people required towing and had a DEAD CAR like some people around here have been guessing.....
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=12230&hed=Feds+Look+at+Hybrid+Safety