Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If you're considering 265/75-16's, load rating should be an issue, I believe. LT tires, C rated and above, are going to be stiffer than P rated tires. They're going to ride rougher and, depending on brand, may be louder. As you get into their wear cycle, they may become down right annoying. They are heavier (C's are several pounds heavier that P's) and may reduce stopping, acceleration, and mileage marginally. If you put D or E rated tires on a Trooper, what's the point? You're going to pound you teeth out.
I ran Scorpion "C" rated LT tires for a while. I didn't like them a bit. I then switched to Revo "P" rated. The Revos perform wonderfully. They are quiet, smooth, and offer great traction in all situations. As I don't carry huge loads regularly,like a pickup, I don't see the need for heavier duty tires. These are certainly heavy duty enough.
As for the gas mileage penalty, I just haven't seen it. I still get roughly the same mileage that I did with the stock tires, about 17 +/- mpg in normal mixed driving, maybe over 18 on the open road. Logic would seem to indicate that this would not be the case, but, in my case, it is. Maybe the higher effective gear ratio offsets the weight penalty of the tires. If you're figuring mileage you do have to add about 6-7% to account for the difference in tire circumference.
There are penalties for going with larger tires. There is a noticeable change in gearing. You will definitely notice slower acceleration off the line. In some situations, I've found the higher gearing to be a positive. You get used to it. I mean. let's face it. The Trooper is not exactly a rocket ship, anyway. Braking may or may not be impacted. The tires are heavier and that means its harder to stop them from rotating. However, they do have a wider tread and that may assist stopping in certain situations. In the real world, I don't think this is going to be an issue. I feel that the Trooper definitely handles better with the larger tires.
The looks are certainly transformed with the 265/75's. It sits a little higher. The wheel wells are filled out better. It looks tougher.
I don't know how much tread depth, when comparing different types of tires, really has to do with wear. Wear is determined by depth, compounds, tread design, tread width, the tire carcass, etc. When you're comparing different brands or even different load ratings within a given brand, a couple of fractions of an inch may not mean much. Although a C rated tire may have a skosh deeper tread, it may build up more heat because of the stiffer, heavier, carcass than a P rated tire. This could mean more tire wear. This might offset any apparent advantage a deeper tread might have. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
One thing I will say related to tire performance and wear on a Trooper is get a good alignment. It has been my experience that these vehicles are hard to align properly. I've only recently found a shop that could align it right. I'd pretty much given up on it. After 95,000 miles, I think I finally have it aligned correctly. Better late than never.
Are larger tires worth the extra bucks? Hard to say. Obviously I think they are. I've had three sets. My recommendation is the Revos in a P265/75-16 size or maybe 275/70-16. Some have used the 275/70's and liked them. I would beware of higher load rated LT tires on your Trooper, unless you have some special need for them. They could just be over kill. Good luck.
LT265/75R16LRC are load rated at 112
..
But your point is well taken: If I want a nice smooth quiet ride, go with the P rated tires. I think I'll do that even though there will be less tread depth. I am very impressed with the traction my current set of Revos are providing with only 5/32nds left, they saved me in a recent extreme emergency stop in the rain.
..
Here is one study on tread depth vs. rolling resistance that shows less tread is more MPG:
http://www.tiresociety.org/2000-2009/00abstract/2000-27.htm
..
And another, for big trucks this time, not exact comparison, but interesting anyway. In this study the 75 profile tires gave better MPG than the 70 profile.
http://www.trucktires.com/us_eng/technical/bftechnical/fuel_econo- my_f.asp
..
Thank You
The P265/75 tire in the Revo has a .3 inch narrower tread than the LT265/75 and the P275/70. This would tend to make it a better tire in snow conditions. I drive in snow a fair amount and my P265/75 Revos seem to work very well.
I think this the article that was mentioned a while ago:
http://motortrend.com/features/care/112_0001_ccwinter/index.html
did a search and it looks like someone got $3000 off the buy back... however it was from Isuzu Motors.
Anybody have any experience with Bank One? I have 18 months left on my lease and have over 40k miles with a limit of 46k.
Residual is $11K? Unless i'm pretty sure that I can get $3000 off also, i'll probably guy another car and let it sit in the driveway once I hit 46k miles. I called them about buying back early but they wont' talk to me until 6 months before teh lease expiry. argh
Can anybody help with how Bank One handles these buy backs? I can't imagine that htey want it back.
Hate to buy another car and then have them offer me something much less than stated residual.
Thanks Alot!
Michael
I think Rancho (and many other auto part manufactories) did research on this: First most people don’t keep the original receipts; second, if you want to return the shocks, you have to first replace them with something else. So I think there are not many people like me who am so suborned. Now my Trooper has 80K miles, I don’t how long the current Monroe shock will last. Maybe I will wait until 150K miles to install the replaced Rancho, or maybe go ahead to sell them at EBay? By the way, the Monroe shocks I got at Sears also have life-long warranty.
The same thing goes with rebates. Companies know most people will forget about filing for their rebate. It's interesting that they are making you go through the selling dealer. What if they went out of business in the interim?
Which Monroe's did you go with and how do like the ride? Controlled, too soft, too hard, bouncy? I'm really leaning to a monotube gas shock, but am 'crafting' an email to OME for some recommendations.
I may also see about "cross-referencing" the adjustable monotube MX6 shock from Explorer ProComp but am doubtful of a fit.
BTW, we may be getting the 'winter' gas mix here in Memphis now. The past couple of tanks have been a little over 17 mpg while my usual in the spring/summer/fall is a little over 18 in my normal mixed driving.... Goes down at least 1 mpg ever winter with the oxygenated gas.
I filled up yesterday with premium (long story), and today, cold idle was up 200-300 rpm. Temps are still in the 70's here, and idle was normal until the fillup. Interesting.
The shocks I got are Monroe Sensa-Trac. I got them at Sears Auto. They have a promotion of free installation for Monroe Sensa-Trac and Rancho. The final price I paid is $160 before tax. My local mechanic gave me a $300+ quote for them. So it is a bargain.
But I have to admit the Sears Auto Sales people are jerks. First, the guy pretended he didn’t know there was the promotion and wanted to charge me the full price and labor. Then he tried to sell me a set of tires to replace my current ones, which only have 30k miles. I remember their Bridgestone costs about $130. So I told the guy, I could get the same ones at Costco for $90. It is funny that the guys said: “well, I can give you the price $90 if you buy them today”.
After the sale, the sales guy gave me a $5 rebate form and asked me to call an 800 number to fill out a customer satisfactory survey. The guy old me “When they ask you, you just choose 5”. Later I called the number, the survey is like this: please rate your Sears Auto Sales people, 5 for most satisfied, 1 for least satisfied. These sale guys just assume I was an idiots
Had Yokohama Geolander AT's and really liked them except for two things. 1. Didn't do well on ice, and 2. They wore out in 25,000 miles. Thought that a bit short. Will likely put on Revo's next spring since everyone so raves about them.
I know there has been some talk about Trooper engine failures in a couple of year Troopers as well oil burning and the lifter ticking issues. But that is about it, overall. Generally quite reliable. I've never had any problems.
Looking at other boards, most all vehicles have some major problems.
Nissan Armada - lots of nagging issues, bad brakes, Lemon law buy-backs.
Honda Pilot and Acura MDX - Transmission recalls and failures.
Honda CRV - Not for me, but, engine fires? Come on.
Toyota's - sludging.
Volkswagen Toureg - lots of gremlins, especially electrical.
GM Quintuplets - everything that can go wrong.
So, hopefully, Isuzu will bring something nice for 2007. We'll have to wait and see. Wouldn't it be funny if the reliability leader turns out to be the Land Rover LR3!
I agree that most vehicles have problems, even major problems. It is really how the dealers/corporation handle them. Isuzu just closed the dealership near me (40 minutes). Fortunately my warranty is up so I won't have to drive 2 hours to get told something is normal or Isuzu won't support it.
I like my Trooper, but I think Isuzu's dealership performance has been poor. That was the 4th dealer I have been to that has closed and only 1 out of 4 was good.
I have a 2003 TL-S. No problems with the tranny myself (yet), but I know of a few who have - one with multiple failures. I haven't done the recall yet - will likely do so in a week or so. Not too happy with the idea of an external "oil jet kit" but hope it is an actual fix. I may add a bigger external trans cooler too, since the issue seems to be some overheating.
In terms of a replacement, again hopefully not for years, right now I'd probably go with a used G-Wagen. Not too thrilled with Mercedes, but like the mechanicals on the G series.
I also like the Montero - good 4wd system - but wouldn't get into another situation with a troubled car company and potential for decreasing # of dealers. The local Chevy dealer does warranty work, but for an actual Isuzu dealer, I'd have to travel 150 miles away.
Kind of funny looking at other vehicles. In the last three years it seems manufacturers have added another level of complexity to cars. My 2001 Troooper seems "simple" compared to some of the new vehicles. It's a bit funny on the GM quintuptlets that much of the warranty work is "software updates" - everything from ventilation problems & dash lights, to the radiator cooling fan.
Interesting that Isuzu made a profit? How many Ascenders did they have to sell? Or maybe it is on overcharging on service :-)
I guess those numbers must be from its Box Truck and Diesel engine sales.
I think a hear a noise coming from AC pulley. It is intermittent and not steady yet. Hopefully I won't have to replace it. Anyone else have to replace the pulley. Can you lube it? Cheers to all!
2000 "S"
Given the number of oil collection spots and drain plugs on a 4WD TOD Trooper how can you tell which is which? You have the engine oil sump, the transfer case, front and rear axle gear cases. There are drain and fill plugs all over heck and back and nothing looks like the pictures in the manual because there are exhaust pipes, skid plates etc.
-mike
-mike
Buying a 2005 Armada.
Any thoughts from my Trooper buddy's out there?
-mike
I can't say that I'm real partial to the Yukon either, but in this case it seems to be at least on even footing with the Armada.
Tom
Yukon Denali ($50K+) with rear steering turning circle = 38.3 ft.
2005 Auto Show in Detroit will have the next Isuzu SUV.
..
Maybe worth waiting for 15% better fuel economy or less expensive diesel:
What Edmunds.com Says: The Yukon will appear with a ground-up redesign in the spring of 2006
http://www.edmunds.com/future/2007/gmc/yukon/100491429/preview.ht- ml?tid=edmunds.n.typemindex.content.num12.2.*
..
Paison, A friend of mine recently replaced his xterra with a Chevy extra cab pickup with 8 bolt wheels. He figures that since his payment is a little less, it was a free upgrade! I guess all those extra years of payments don't count. He imediately bought BFG TKO tires LT265/75R16LRD because he says they make the truck look like a truck.
..
Anyway, back to the Armada, my firend and I agree that the Armada would be a great vehicle, but the Chevy was way less money, or at least a lower payment, so he went with Chevy.
..
Personally, I think the full size wagons or SUVs (Yukon etc..) and the pickups are the best things that GM makes. I think these are the most important product line to GM so they make sure they will be decent.
..
http://www.gmc.com/yukon/
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?n=157,181&sid=181&a- mp;article=5348
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/nissan/armada/100351269/review.ht- ml
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?n=157,181&sid=181&a- mp;article=6831 http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/bfgapp/catalog/tires/allterraintak- o.jsp
I would stay clear during the first model year. The brake thing is a known issue. The Sequoia is real nice. I test drove one of those years back and it drove like a SMV. These bigger trucks are not as nimble as the trooper, however at 12 MPG I think I wouldn't mind getting a full size truck.
Comparisons offroad, my brother's expedition has oodles of power which makes it feel fairly unstoppable, my trooper can turn around on a tight trail where most vehicles can't.
I'd go for a Duramax Pickup, but I really want the whole thing enclosed.
As much as I'm a fan of Isuzu, at this point I couldn't go out and buy the "new" suv from them for a few reasons...
No V8 likely
No dealers, I used to have 10 within a 1/2hr drive, now there is 2. No matter how good a vehicle is you need dealer support without it, you have to get it at a significant discount to make it worth your while to buy it.
-mike
-mike
This morning was the first time I had it in my garage and I noticed a leak on the floor. I'm not sure if it's oil leak as it looks lighter and more watery than engine oil. Could it be transmission fuel or power steering fluid?
I rang the dealer and he is giving me an option to swap the car for others on his lot. One of the cars my wife prefers is Volvo S70 Base Model Sedan 98' manual with 95K miles. I did a little bit of research on the Volvo and the reviews were not that great on this base model.
Does anyone have any experience with these Volvos or/and any suggestions where I should go from here? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
..
Could be windshield washer bottle leak at the pump if under front fender forward of the passenger side front tire.
..
Good Luck in whatever you choose to drive.
..
I agree with the idea that buying a first issue of most anything is risky, so I too would wait a couple years after the new Isuzu models come out before buying. I have less than 60K on my 2001 Trooper and I drive Troopers at least 200K and 10 years, so I am good till 2012 or so with my 2001. I will advise my kids about buying their first cars by then, so I will have increased need to know what's out there beyond just the SUV catagory.
..
The new breed of Isuzu should be a whole new world, since they will be separate from GM and maybe partner with other companies instead. It will at least be fun to watch what comes out.
..
I think gasoline prices are above $150 permanently now and may stay near where they are aroung $185 near me, so I am watching for big improvements in MPG for a communting car that's big enough to be safe.
BTW, dealer was willing to swap the car after Xmas for something else. I told him Volvo is not an option for me. Does anyone know if I am stuck with this dealer for good, or do I have the right to ask for my money back? That way I can purchase another car this weekend. Your thoughts?
Otherwise...let him fix the leak and keep it.