could be due to stiffer springs, resulting in a higher payload?? We don't know that for sure since SOA decided not to list the cargo capacity on the '04 door jam sticker.
It did list 4445 as the GVWR, IIRC. I know it was at least that much, and it may have been 4545. Wwxman, what's the GVWR of your '03 model? If it's less than that, then I think we can safely assume there's a little more payload capacity to the '04 model.
As to market appeal, I'm with juice. Subaru needed to improve the vehicle in a number ways, not just marketing:*
Styling The new color scheme addressed that in an inexpensive way. To really address it in a more through way requires extensive body revisions. That won't happen before the next-generation model arrives. So this was a good compromise, given the circumstances, IMO.
Content They're added some nice features, at least with the turbo; such as heated seats, and VTD/SportShift with the turbo auto. Both of these items help a lot IMO, to make the car more appealing. Base models don't get these, I guess to keep the price down.
Capability (payload/towing) I don't think this will change significantly until the next generation model. Even then it may not change much.
Appeal to a wider audience The turbo does that. If you don't want a turbo, buy the non-turbo. They're both there to address different customers.
Value Don't yet know what the sticker will be, but SOA is very sensitive to this issue, based on how they've contented/priced other Subies—especially the WRX.
* = For what it's worth, I've been involved with marketing for over 30 years. Marketing is very important, but it won't make up for an inferior product. Marketing can get people into the showroom, but it won't (necessarily) make people buy the product. If they do buy the product, they may not be happy with it, and won't return for repeat business.
is the original was basically fine -- except for the obvious: bad color scheme (except silver); no lockable bed cover; limited utility with no true avalanche type pass through. Some of these issues will be addressed now it seems. As for what the subie fans are chirping about -- the turbo and higher ground clearance, these would not have made the Baja a significantly bigger hit out of the starting gate IMO. The reason the Baja will sell better now is better colors, better marketing and, perhaps, the buzz created by the turbo. In short, to Joe Public, its essentially the same vehicle -- most will not spring for the turbo and have little idea what ground clearance is (let alone, that the new model has 1.1" more).
the turbo and higher ground clearance, these would not have made the Baja a significantly bigger hit out of the starting gate IMO.
I couldn't disagree more.
The Impreza TS and RS are also "basically fine," yet don't sell worth a darn. The (turbo) WRX sells in bunches. Same will happen with the Baja turbo, mark my word. The automotive world is littered with "basically fine" vehicles that also don't sell. I will agree with you that the "buzz" created by the turbo will rub off on non-turbo Bajas. For that reason alone, the turbo version should be welcomed.
Wxxman, it's great that you like the Baja pretty much as is. Many of us don't; and for us, the Baja turbo may be the better choice.
The good old legacy AND outback lines far outsell the impreza line. The WRX impreza accounts for roughly 60% of impreza sales -- I wouldn't say the non-turbos don't sell a darn. Put in perpective, the WRX accounts for 22,000 of 180,000 subies sold. Frankly, I also think the Baja is more suited to the outback crowd anyway. Don't get me wrong, I think a turbo option is fine. I tend to think the extra ground clearance is almost irrelevant. What I am saying is that the masses who must buy the car (not folks like those on subie bds.) will mostly not buy the turbo (unless there's almost no difference in price) and couldn't pick out the higher ground clearance to save their lives. Why then will these changes make all the difference. I say it will be better marketing.
I have some pics from the show that shows about 1000lbs of live-load in the back of the baja and the rear only came down to just above the wheel-mark. Very impressive.
You'd be surprised at how significant the slight lift is. Go see one first. Early on when we saw the lift kit from iSR Subaru, everyone liked it. I think it'll sway a few opinions at the very minimum.
Did anyone peek under there to see if a full-size spare was fitted? Just curious.
Legacy sold poorly until the L/SE arrived. Outback far outsells it (2 to 1) mostly due to image, marketing, and the taller suspension. Baja just improved 2 of those 3!
Use Lance Armstrong wisely, and they've got all 3.
WRX is 60% of Impreza sales, I bet the Outback Sport is the other 40%, LOL! They sold about 3 TS wagons last year, maybe a handful of RSs. I bet the numbers aren't significant.
So again, the two that sell are the lifted model (OBS) and the sporty one (WRX). Again, the 2004 Baja addresses both of those issues.
I'm not saying it'll be Subaru's Element, which is selling at a brisk pace right now, but it'll sell maybe 2k units per month and more importantly, survive until the next generation.
paisan: thanks for doin' the real-world test! Now it can be used to trailer the prom king and queen at the high school float parade. :-)
would be hardly noticable without a direct side-by-by-side viewing. 1.1" is not that much. The "beefier" impression could be caused by many factors. Just remember, added height causes performance deficts on paved roads and increases rollover propensity. If Subie takes a hit in the rollover testing (the outback wasn't that great at 7.3"), I think this will go down as another blunder. In fact, the 2004 WRX had its ground clearance reduced by 1/2".
Yeah, but a WRX appeals to an audience that would otherwise lower it anyway. Baja owners are far more likely to lift it.
I'm not saying there aren't trade-offs, of course there are. I still think it's worth it, and I doubt it will end up a blunder. I bet NHTSA gives it 3 stars. Only a couple of vehicles get 4.
Is it me or is Subaru someking some wacky tobacco. $25k for a forester is tooo much in my opinion. They need to get their prices more in-line with other manuf. I have nothing against Subarus, but I do not like what I see when it comes to their prices.
$25k is a low price nowadays, even if Subaru did charge that. I think the average transaction, per NADA, is above $24 grand, and the average car doesn't have AWD or 235 lb-ft of torque.
Go price a Liberty - they hit $28k easily when well equipped. And the Forester will run circles around one.
Escape and CR-V cost less but don't have half the features/content. In fact, the Forester leads the class in terms of content. Who else gives you a moonroof that big? Or heated seats/mirrors plus front and rear windshield de-icers?
I need to get a better job. Paying that much for a Forester seems sick to me. The 03 WRXs are priced at $21 even. That is acceptable. Looks like my Golf TDI at $16k was a bargain. Liberty sport can be had for $17k here.
I doubt it, unless it was a bare-bones 2WD. Here's the Liberty page(s) from FitzMall, which are some of the best price anywhere, and none of them are anywhere near $17K. $19,654 is the cheapest one I found, and most are well above this figure, even Sport models.
The Subaru Crew meets every Thursday at 6PM PT/9PM ET... stop by and join us to talk Subaru or anything else automotive that might come up! Hope to see you there tonight!
Thomas: then don't (pay that much for a Forester). The X model will still be available. I've seen some for around $18.7k, freight included! I has everything one could argue they "need", the rest are frills.
Price a Liberty with 4WD, then add the V6, which is still slower than Subaru's 2.5l BTW. Now add ABS, cruise, keyless, power this and that, and you're at $20k I bet. And you're equipment is equivalent to the X model.
The Sports don't come that well equipped, if you analyze it closely.
in the Baja turbo teaser brochure, that I picked up at the NY show, that the hard cargo lid SNUGLID is mentioned. Not only is it mentioned, but it is featured on the cover photo, as well as the large inside photo too.
The way it's worded, however, suggests that it may(?) be considered a 3rd-party option, and not an official SOA option. Still, I think it is significant that it is mentioned in the Baja turbo teaser brochure. That at least lends a "stamp of SOA approval" of some sort...
A locald ealer has trhe new Baja S for $19,800. The original Baja for $20,600. Duh, which one to choose? What happened to the $18-18,500 prices for the Baja S?
The Sport is a new model and the incentives may not apply for it. Eventually, they will, you just have to be patient. You want to have the first Sport on the block? The discount from MSRP is much smaller than the leather clad model.
Keep in mind some people prefer cloth. I wish I had cloth on my Miata, for instance, and yes I'd be willing to trade for a tan colored cloth set in decent condition.
I've been shopping for buckets and a console/armrest to replace the split bench in my Tacoma. Haven't found the perfect set yet but quite a few seem to come & go at pretty reasonable prices. The same may be true for Miata seats.
No, but that's an interesting thought. Guess it hasn't been bothering me, but then again it's only starting to get hot now. In mid-summer the seats get sticky-hot, it's nasty.
The Baja's payload is 800 pounds, at least for MY '03. The '04 Baja has a 1.1" increase in ground clearance. I'm hoping(!) that's dues to stiffer springs, which will result in a bit more payload capacity; but don't know for sure yet.
And yes, the Avalanche 1500 also has a lousy payload considering its size. The Avalanche 2500 more than likely has a payload of ~ 2000 pounds or more, however.
However, considering it's mission in life 1200 pounds is probably OK. I wish the Baja's payload was ~ 1000 – 1100 pounds, which is in the neighborhood of the Explorer Sport Trac. I think that's possible and realistic, but it may have to wait until the next-generation Baja debuts.
Speaking of lousy payloads, did you know Ford's huge 4x4 Excursion only has a payload of around 1600–1700 pounds? You can thank its enormous curb weight for that. A comparable Chevy Suburban 2500 has a payload of roughly a 1000 pounds more!
Went to the Subie dealer yesterday to drive one, but at 9pm they were about to close.
And get this - they only had ONE left in stock, a yellow one on the showroom floor! The incentives and that web coupon for $500 off appeared to have worked, they sold out! Wow. I'd love to see April sales figures.
I told the sales guy I'd seen on in NY, that the small lift made it look beefier and the colors were better. He seemed excited about it. They are no longer sitting on the lots, and even small improvements ought to help.
He didn't know when the turbo would come, funny he actually asked me what they said at the NY show.
He told me the Sports sell for about $1000 less than the regular models on average.
Bummer I didn't get to drive one, but the news is encouraging.
Just a reminder that every Thursday you can join the Subaru Crew for a chat session from 6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET. Stop in to talk about Subaru or just to say hello!... We had a great turnout last week, but there's always room for more, so stop by and join in this week! Hope to see you there!!
Silly question as I forgot to look at the autoshow, but where does the spare go on the Baja. I don't recall seeing anything underneath, and it looked like there was no "hatch" to access from the bed.
I am about to become a first time Subaru owner. I should be taking delivery of a Yellow Baja next week. From the reading I've done most people don't like the cladding & yellow, but that is what first attracted me to it on TV and the internet. What are other peoples experiences?
I'm getting rid of a '97 Rav4 which I've never had 1 day of trouble with so I hope the change will be a good one. Any fun stories or experiences while I wait?
Thanks...no real need for heavy hauling, just me and my bird dog. I'm looking forward to a smoother ride than my RAV, although I think I'll have to get used to sitting lower with less head room. I'm also excited about how the back seat fips up so my dog can be on the floor instead of up on the seats. Does that seat stay up on its own without the backs being folded down or would I need to secure it so it doesn't fall back down?
BTW, I saw my first Baja with the factory soft tonneau cover today on a dealer lot. I wasn't impressed. It looks like a real pain in the [non-permissible content removed] to use.
I just picked up a yellow Baja yesterday with a soft cover installed. I like the looks(the black with yellow) and really is not that hard to use but I'm not sure it is going to hold up very well to much use.
If anyone else has one, how do you use the cross bar under the cover? Does anyone like the hard cover better?
Love my underpowered,overcladded,useless bed, overpriced and screaming yellow BAJA:))
Comments
It did list 4445 as the GVWR, IIRC. I know it was at least that much, and it may have been 4545. Wwxman, what's the GVWR of your '03 model? If it's less than that, then I think we can safely assume there's a little more payload capacity to the '04 model.
As to market appeal, I'm with juice. Subaru needed to improve the vehicle in a number ways, not just marketing:*
Styling
The new color scheme addressed that in an inexpensive way. To really address it in a more through way requires extensive body revisions. That won't happen before the next-generation model arrives. So this was a good compromise, given the circumstances, IMO.
Content
They're added some nice features, at least with the turbo; such as heated seats, and VTD/SportShift with the turbo auto. Both of these items help a lot IMO, to make the car more appealing. Base models don't get these, I guess to keep the price down.
Capability (payload/towing)
I don't think this will change significantly until the next generation model. Even then it may not change much.
Appeal to a wider audience
The turbo does that. If you don't want a turbo, buy the non-turbo. They're both there to address different customers.
Value
Don't yet know what the sticker will be, but SOA is very sensitive to this issue, based on how they've contented/priced other Subies—especially the WRX.
* = For what it's worth, I've been involved with marketing for over 30 years. Marketing is very important, but it won't make up for an inferior product. Marketing can get people into the showroom, but it won't (necessarily) make people buy the product. If they do buy the product, they may not be happy with it, and won't return for repeat business.
Bob
I couldn't disagree more.
The Impreza TS and RS are also "basically fine," yet don't sell worth a darn. The (turbo) WRX sells in bunches. Same will happen with the Baja turbo, mark my word. The automotive world is littered with "basically fine" vehicles that also don't sell. I will agree with you that the "buzz" created by the turbo will rub off on non-turbo Bajas. For that reason alone, the turbo version should be welcomed.
Wxxman, it's great that you like the Baja pretty much as is. Many of us don't; and for us, the Baja turbo may be the better choice.
Bob
-mike
Did anyone peek under there to see if a full-size spare was fitted? Just curious.
Legacy sold poorly until the L/SE arrived. Outback far outsells it (2 to 1) mostly due to image, marketing, and the taller suspension. Baja just improved 2 of those 3!
Use Lance Armstrong wisely, and they've got all 3.
WRX is 60% of Impreza sales, I bet the Outback Sport is the other 40%, LOL! They sold about 3 TS wagons last year, maybe a handful of RSs. I bet the numbers aren't significant.
So again, the two that sell are the lifted model (OBS) and the sporty one (WRX). Again, the 2004 Baja addresses both of those issues.
I'm not saying it'll be Subaru's Element, which is selling at a brisk pace right now, but it'll sell maybe 2k units per month and more importantly, survive until the next generation.
paisan: thanks for doin' the real-world test! Now it can be used to trailer the prom king and queen at the high school float parade. :-)
-juice
I'm not saying there aren't trade-offs, of course there are. I still think it's worth it, and I doubt it will end up a blunder. I bet NHTSA gives it 3 stars. Only a couple of vehicles get 4.
-juice
Is it me or is Subaru someking some wacky tobacco. $25k for a forester is tooo much in my opinion. They need to get their prices more in-line with other manuf. I have nothing against Subarus, but I do not like what I see when it comes to their prices.
What about a 40K+ version of the Contour, that is touted as a jag?
-mike
Go price a Liberty - they hit $28k easily when well equipped. And the Forester will run circles around one.
Escape and CR-V cost less but don't have half the features/content. In fact, the Forester leads the class in terms of content. Who else gives you a moonroof that big? Or heated seats/mirrors plus front and rear windshield de-icers?
-juice
-mike
Imagine a turbo for $22 grand, maybe a tad more, suddendly sounds like a bargain, no?
Even an auto Premium with leather ought to run about $28k, with a street price of $25k or so.
-juice
http://www.fitzmall.com/carfind/resultsa.asp?mode=NEW&lstMake- - =JEEP|LIBERTY
Sounds to me like you're thinking in terms of 1996-like prices, or even earlier. Welcome to 2003.
Bob
The Subaru Crew meets every Thursday at 6PM PT/9PM ET... stop by and join us to talk Subaru or anything else automotive that might come up! Hope to see you there tonight!
/direct/view/.eea5f48
PF Flyer
Host
Pickups & News & Views Message Boards
Price a Liberty with 4WD, then add the V6, which is still slower than Subaru's 2.5l BTW. Now add ABS, cruise, keyless, power this and that, and you're at $20k I bet. And you're equipment is equivalent to the X model.
The Sports don't come that well equipped, if you analyze it closely.
-juice
The way it's worded, however, suggests that it may(?) be considered a 3rd-party option, and not an official SOA option. Still, I think it is significant that it is mentioned in the Baja turbo teaser brochure. That at least lends a "stamp of SOA approval" of some sort...
http://www.snugtop.com/wn_02snuglid_subaru.htm
Bob
What happened to the $18-18,500 prices for the Baja S?
Keep in mind some people prefer cloth. I wish I had cloth on my Miata, for instance, and yes I'd be willing to trade for a tan colored cloth set in decent condition.
-juice
I've been shopping for buckets and a console/armrest to replace the split bench in my Tacoma. Haven't found the perfect set yet but quite a few seem to come & go at pretty reasonable prices. The same may be true for Miata seats.
-james
At least the Baja's are perforated.
-juice
As some have noted here the Baja has a light payload of just over 1000 lbs. Well the big brute Avalanche has only just over 1200 lbs payload.
--jay
DaveM
Even so 1200 for a full size Avalanche is poor.
--jay
And yes, the Avalanche 1500 also has a lousy payload considering its size. The Avalanche 2500 more than likely has a payload of ~ 2000 pounds or more, however.
However, considering it's mission in life 1200 pounds is probably OK. I wish the Baja's payload was ~ 1000 – 1100 pounds, which is in the neighborhood of the Explorer Sport Trac. I think that's possible and realistic, but it may have to wait until the next-generation Baja debuts.
Speaking of lousy payloads, did you know Ford's huge 4x4 Excursion only has a payload of around 1600–1700 pounds? You can thank its enormous curb weight for that. A comparable Chevy Suburban 2500 has a payload of roughly a 1000 pounds more!
Bob
And get this - they only had ONE left in stock, a yellow one on the showroom floor! The incentives and that web coupon for $500 off appeared to have worked, they sold out! Wow. I'd love to see April sales figures.
I told the sales guy I'd seen on in NY, that the small lift made it look beefier and the colors were better. He seemed excited about it. They are no longer sitting on the lots, and even small improvements ought to help.
He didn't know when the turbo would come, funny he actually asked me what they said at the NY show.
He told me the Sports sell for about $1000 less than the regular models on average.
Bummer I didn't get to drive one, but the news is encouraging.
-juice
Hopefully that rear lift also made room for some beefier tires, which could give you a further lift.
-mike
Just a reminder that every Thursday you can join the Subaru Crew for a chat session from 6-7pm PT/9-10pm ET. Stop in to talk about Subaru or just to say hello!... We had a great turnout last week, but there's always room for more, so stop by and join in this week! Hope to see you there!!
/direct/view/.eea5f48
PF FlyerHostPickups & News & Views Message Boards
-juice
Mark
-juice
I should be taking delivery of a Yellow Baja next week. From the reading I've done most people don't like the cladding & yellow, but that is what first attracted me to it on TV and the internet. What are other peoples experiences?
I'm getting rid of a '97 Rav4 which I've never had 1 day of trouble with so I hope the change will be a good one. Any fun stories or experiences while I wait?
Sales were down a little in April after a really hot March, they were under 1000.
CR just reviewed the Baja, in the current issue. Check it out.
-juice
I agree with Juice, the yellow is a photo-opt color, it looks different in person, more orange.
Any info on new colors and price for 2004?
Bill
Hey, CR just rated it pretty highly, above the CR-V overall.
-juice
Glad to see the high rating with CR. What did they say about it? Are there any known issues with the Baja I should be looking for?
Bob
I'm looking forward to a smoother ride than my RAV, although I think I'll have to get used to sitting lower with less head room.
I'm also excited about how the back seat fips up so my dog can be on the floor instead of up on the seats.
Does that seat stay up on its own without the backs being folded down or would I need to secure it so it doesn't fall back down?
Bob
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=36- 1995
BTW, I saw my first Baja with the factory soft tonneau cover today on a dealer lot. I wasn't impressed. It looks like a real pain in the [non-permissible content removed] to use.
Bob
I just picked up a yellow Baja yesterday with a soft cover installed. I like the looks(the black with yellow) and really is not that hard to use but I'm not sure it is going to hold up very well to much use.
If anyone else has one, how do you use the cross bar under the cover?
Does anyone like the hard cover better?
Love my underpowered,overcladded,useless bed, overpriced and screaming yellow BAJA:))
Jeff
Atta boy Jeff!!!
Saw a red one on MacArthur Blvd today, only my 2nd Baja sighting (outside of dealer cars on test drives).
-juice
Is it reasonabe to change the oil after
the first 1000 miles or is waiting til
3-4000 okay?
Jeff
You should join us in the Subaru Crew -> http://townhall.edmunds.com/cgi-bin/townhall.subaru
-Brian
My nearest Sub dealer is over an hour away so
I might have to find a local garage.
With my old car I just quick changed it every
3000 miles or so.