Here's '63 coupe. Reupholstered front seat at least...and is this what an Imperial front seat looked like in '63? Where's the center armrest?
That front seat upholstery looks all wrong to me, both in terms of pattern (the stitching pattern is too wide) and the fabric (looks like a velour material). Too bad.
The IPs are similar but not identical. Here is a '67 Chrysler New Yorker IP:
Here's the Imperial:
The Chrysler IP bowed out in the center while the Imp's did not, and the Imp also had a number of neat features like a pop-up vanity mirror in the glove compartment and a cover for the radio.
It may just be my inner car freak showing, but I am somewhat bothered by the fact that the seller of that '66 doesn't know that year has a 440 in it, not a 413.
2009 BMW 335i, 2003 Corvette cnv. (RIP 2001 Jaguar XK8 cnv and 1985 MB 380SE [the best of the lot])
I thought that '67 Imperial had a 'bowed out' look to the top pad, but maybe that's just sagging of an old vinyl part. Thank you for pointing out the differences, and there are quite a few.
A "pop-up vanity mirror in the glove compartment"? Wonder where they got that idea? Same place they were able to pick up the "Challenger" and "Daytona" names!
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
In my memory, it's unusual to see a convertible with a rear-seat center armrest like that Imperial has. My experience with large convertibles is mostly GM, but I always figured in a convertible, GM made the rear-seat back cushion thinner, making a center armrest not nearly as useful. Matter of fact, in the early '70's, GM even started cutting out rear-seat center armrests in coupes, when the hardtop sedan version of the same model and interior trim had them (Pontiac Grand Ville with optional Custom interior; Buick Centurion).
Neat touch on that Imperial.
Is that vinyl or leather inside? If leather, it's avoided the wrinkly/lined leather look that seems so typical.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Here's a pic of the silver leather interior. Imagine how great it would look with the original Charcoal Gray Metallic paint on that '67.
Regarding rear-seat center armrests, I suspect GM did that because the top mechanism ate up significant width in the rear because the frames went into each side until '71, making the rear seat narrower than the coupes. Of course starting with the '71s the frame was different to alleviate that problem but I bet the GM bean counters wouldn't allow the armrest to return, as part of GM's continued cheapening up of their cars back then.
I remember reading that when the Mopars were redesigned for 1969, the convertibles picked up about 10" in back seat shoulder room, because of a redesigned top mechanism. At first, I thought that might have been a bit of hyperbole, but after seeing how much room the surrounds for the top intrude into the back seat area, I can believe it. Looks like it eats about 5" on either side, easily.
I wonder what kind of gains GM saw when they went to the "scissors" type mechanism for 1971?
Awhile back, I took a tape measure to my '67 Catalina, and the way I measured its shoulder room, got 62.5" in the front seat, and about 56" in the back seat, measured between the narrower area in between where the top cuts in. Looking at the sales brochures, Pontiac didn't publish shoulder room, although they did show legroom and headroom stats. I just checked the 1970 Buick brochure though, and they're showing the LeSabre convertible as only having 52.3" of shoulder room in the back! So, I wonder if GM changed the top mechanism from '67-68 to '69-70? Or, maybe I just measured wrong?
I just dug up a '71 Buick brochure, and they're showing the LeSabre convertible at 61.7" of shoulder room! So, it looks like the big '71 GM cars got about a 10" gain in shoulder room, too!
If something happened to my Brougham, I'd go for it! I imagine it would also survive a nuclear war, but with my luck, some d*** dirty apes would burn it!
I have a gut feeling that those black creases are just vinyl. Also, the side bolster on the center armrest is vinyl. But interestingly, it looks like the side bolsters of the seat itself is leather.
I have a friend whose parents had new '56, '60, '65, '67, '70, and '73 Caddy sedans and '76 and '78 Sevilles. My friend's Mom (who recently passed) was a tiny little lady...probably not even five feet tall. He said she used to always say, even later, how she liked their '60 Cadillac, which was a flat-top sedan, as she "...could really see out of it". I can't imagine her even driving a car that large!
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
That car does have amazing visibility. Just look at it in that pic! Even thinner pillars than my old car, too. So unlike the blind spot monsters of today.
My grandma had a downsized FWD big Olds in the 80s, and she liked that car a lot, because the trunk was low, which made reversing easy. Her next cars (2x Taurus) always had her complaining about visibility.
Out my home office window just now, a pale green '62 or '63 Chevy truck cab-with-stake bed. Saw evidence of an unpainted repair at the bottom of the LR front fender, but other than that, moved smartly up our street. Never seen it around before. It had the wraparound windshield, but I didn't notice the location of the front fender series nameplate, which would have told me for sure the year.
One of those vehicles some might say, "Who would want one?", but there it was, zipping up the salt-covered streets of Kent, OH, 50 years old or darn close.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
At one time, I thought about trying to find an older 60's truck to replace my '85 Silverado with Only problem is, it seemed like they were either overly-restored/resto-modded, or in much worse shape than my '85, but nothing in between.
I found myself behind a very nice black over black Buick Electra convertible of mid 70s vintage (w antique plates). I got a good look as the old duffer driving it (original owner?) was doing 20 in a 25 zone. I'd say it was in good number two condition spoiled only by small wheels with snap on fake wires.
Needless to say I passed him like he was standing still.
I'm old-skool, but I always hated numbers as a model name of a car.
To me, the worst was the Cadillac "Series 62". They used that up to the '64 model year. You go into the dealer and say, "I want a '61 62" or "How 'bout a '64 62?" LOL
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Well I didn't see a model name or count the portholes but it looked pretty spiffy for a LeSabre.
LeSabres started getting pretty big, pretentious, and luxurious by the mid 70's, so it would be easy to mistake one for an Electra. Once the 5 mph bumpers went into effect, I think they topped out around 226". An Electra wasn't that much bigger...maybe 231"? I do remember there were a few years where the Electra was actually an inch or two longer than Caddy DeVille.
I always thought the '75 LeSabre convertible was a sharp looking car. Make mine baby blue with the Buick magnum wheels. And a 455. :shades:
To me, nobody's factory wheels were better than Buick's.
I can just picture that LeSabre, andre--white top and white vinyl seats with blue dash, seat belts and carpet, right?!
I remember our local eye doctor buying a firethorn-colored '76 Eldo convertible when new...white interior with red dash, etc. When I was back in town visiting a few years ago, I saw a slightly beat-up looking Eldo pull up to the intersection, top down, and it was the good Dr.! Still owned it. He was a white belt and shoe kind of guy, and somehow that Eldo seemed just right for him! Before that he had a light blue '71 Eldo convert.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Bent unibody, in this case. We had a '68 Valiant for 10+ years, that thing ran forever.
My oddball was a Mk. 1 Rabbit 4-door on the way home from work yesterday (unfortunately nothing special, not a GTI). Didn't stink, so I guess it wasn't a diesel, even more unusual...
That Valiant actually looks kind of upscale in that dark color, and the nicer Signet trim level.
I remember when Darts and Valiants were common sights on the streets, seeing that occurrence where it was going down the street at a bit of an angle (and it always seemed like the the rear was shifted toward the right, never the left) wasn't all that rare.
Darts and Valiants had a very narrow rear track, something like 55.9" compared to around 59" up front, so I think that helped make the most minor offset more noticeable.
That Valiant looks much better in the picture than it did on the street. Also, the interior was very cheap looking, but the engines (Slant 6 and V8) and Torqueflyte were really rugged.
I always thought the size was just right for a sport sedan Chrysler version, with upscale exterior styling and a luxurious interior. It could have been Chrysler's answer to the BMW 2002.
white top and white vinyl seats with blue dash, seat belts and carpet, right?!
Yep, that would be it! For some reason, I always associated that light powder/baby blue as a Buick color. Even though Pontiac, Olds, and Buick also offered it, it just seemed like it was made for Buick. I guess for Olds I always think of burgundy, and for Pontiac, sort of a brown/earthtone color.
I wonder if, for whatever reason, that color was more common on Buicks than the other cars?
Chrysler switched everything to Unibody for 1960, with the exception of Imperial. In fact, Chrysler coined the word "Unibody". However, the cars still have sub-frames up front and in the back, so at a quick glance, looking underneath one, it might appear to be body-on-frame.
The 1960-66 Imperial used the 1957-59 frame, and while the body looked very similar, it was beefed up, so the car was sort of a hybrid of unit-body on top of a frame. Similar to a current-day Honda Ridgeline or Pilot, I guess.
I remember when I was in the military in the 70's that light colored cars like yellow or powder blue seemed more common in the southern states (went with those sansabelt pants, white bucks and belts - just kidding!). A buddy of mine actually bought a big old used, maybe 69 Mercury Marquis convertible in a very light blue shade with white leather. I learned that in cut-offs you could get burned by white leather seats just like darker colors. A nice thing about those light colors is that they didn't seem to show the dirt too badly.
I was talking about exterior colors. I imagine white leather is tough to keep clean. I don't know why more vehicles don't offer saddle colored leather, that used to be popular and I think works well.
Pastel paints were quite common even into the '70s. I remember visiting the Chevy dealer in the fall of '74 to see the new '75 models, and they had several cars in a very dull and rather odd-looking pale blue. The Chevy color chart calls it "Medium Blue" but it was almost closer to a blue-gray drab color that the military might have used. It seemed to have been only used that one year.
I remember in '72 visiting the Plymouth dealer here and he had a new 2-door Scamp hardtop in the showroom in a pale blue shade called "Blue Sky" with a white vinyl roof and a white vinyl interior. Sounds sort of feminine, but it really looked sharp. Back then it seemed Mopar had a lot of non-metallic pastel paints in their assortment - maybe their large taxi and fleet business required such shades.
Ford in the late '60s/early '70s sold a lot of cars in a very pale pastel blue they called Diamond Blue. I remember seeing that color everywhere, on Mustangs, Custom 500s, Fairlanes, you name it.
I'd say that color you remember on '75 Chevys is the same color andre wants on a '75 LeSabre convertible. GM shared colors across divisions then, for the most part, but it was not unusual for the divisions to call them different names. That powder blue was pretty popular in my memory on '75 GM's. The only other blue I remember off the top of my head on '75 Chevys was a metallic, turquoise-blue.
My parents bought a new '74 Impala Sport Coupe (all four windows rolled down) in the last week of Aug. '74, when the dealer had received a few '75's by then. Dad wanted to avoid having to use unleaded gas. There were two '74 Impala Sport Coupes that were identically sticker priced ($4,408.00), but one was maroon with a white painted top and had the black and white herringbone cloth interior (like a nice sport coat!), and the other was a pastel light green (with white painted top) that resembled baby diarrhea to me. It had a nice pattern cloth light green interior. I wanted the maroon one so bad it hurt, but Dad picked the pastel green one.
Come to think of it, when he bought our '77 Impala coupe, I wanted the firethorn coupe in the showroom that was $200 more and had a 350 4-barrel instead of a 305. Dad didn't want four barrels or to spend $200 more (sigh). I guess I've become my old man.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
My parents bought a '74 Impala too, in that same maroon metallic with the black houndstooth cloth interior. It was a 4-door sedan and was an ex-Budget rental - my dad was friends with the local franchisee - and he bought it in the summer of '74. I liked the look of the car but it was not much fun to drive as I found it just too big and the engine had driveability problems due to emissions - when the choke pulled off, the thing ran really lean and would almost die when moving from a stop, then leap forward.
That sports coat fabric on the inside didn't impress me much. We had previously owned '63 and '69 Impalas and their interiors were much nicer than the '74. By then GM was moving the Impala downmarket some and the Caprice was becoming their equivalent car to the older Impala. I remember thinking the fact that the bench seats didn't have a section of vinyl in the center of the seat seemed really cheap, like the older BelAirs and Biscaynes of the '60s.
We didn't keep it long and dad replaced it with a Hornet Sportabout. Later on he bought a '79 Impala 4-door, also from his friend at Budget, in Dark Carmine Metallic with red cloth inside, which was a much nicer car than the '74.
Here are the '74 Impala standard cloth and 'Sport Cloth' seats. (Ours was like the blue shown here, but light green). Hard to see, but there were buttons along the seat backs.
I liked the seats, especially the way the rear seat looked like a 'couch' in the coupes...large, full-length-and-depth armrests on the side panels and 'filler' panels on each end of the back seat back...but didn't like all the black plastic on the instrument panel that year. At least the steering wheel was color-keyed that year, unlike the older Impalas of that generation.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
It's odd that the car we had was fitted with what the brochure calls "sport cloth" seats. I can't understand why a Budget rental would be ordered with that. Actually I don't think I've ever seen what the brochure calls the standard cloth in any '74. All I've seen are the herringbone pattern.
I think a full-size Chevy of that 'porker' era I could've enjoyed, would have been a '75 Impala Sport Coupe, fully loaded, wire wheelcovers (I hated the '75 full wheelcovers), the saddle-colored 'Sport Cloth' seats with 50/50 front seat, the couple of extra gauges....the end of an era at Chevy (full-size true hardtop coupe).
I never liked on the '73 and '74, how the side molding went over top of the front wheel opening and right up to the front of the car.
BTW, the '74 full wheelcovers were the '70 wheelcover. I never knew Chevy to do that before. Similarly, the '75 Monza Towne Coupe wheelcovers were early-Corvair.
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
One of the things Chevy did with that generation after a while was introduce a styling feature on the Caprice one year, then move it to the Impala the next year. This seemed most prevalent with the '75 and '76 Impalas, which looked much like the previous-year Caprices.
One thing I never realized is that when they killed off the BelAir in the US in '76 they introduced an Impala S stripper model that was much the same. Here in Canada the BelAir lived on for a few years more.
GM afflicted the Impala with that sport cloth material for years, starting I believe in '73. By '76 they had changed the pattern a bit and it looked like a Herb Tarlek sports coat.
Yeah, I know what you mean. It became a plaid. I will say I saw a '76 Impala wagon once, older but clean, for sale and it had a bright red interior with whitish/reddish plaid 'sport cloth'. I kind of liked it for the red interior that wasn't seen that often anymore. A friend was looking at it for his wife and she was horrified!
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Comments
We're the ones in the Imperial, and we're running last?! :shades:
A 1960 must be pretty rare today.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
That front seat upholstery looks all wrong to me, both in terms of pattern (the stitching pattern is too wide) and the fabric (looks like a velour material). Too bad.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Here's the Imperial:
The Chrysler IP bowed out in the center while the Imp's did not, and the Imp also had a number of neat features like a pop-up vanity mirror in the glove compartment and a cover for the radio.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2009 BMW 335i, 2003 Corvette cnv. (RIP 2001 Jaguar XK8 cnv and 1985 MB 380SE [the best of the lot])
A "pop-up vanity mirror in the glove compartment"? Wonder where they got that idea? Same place they were able to pick up the "Challenger" and "Daytona" names!
Neat touch on that Imperial.
Is that vinyl or leather inside? If leather, it's avoided the wrinkly/lined leather look that seems so typical.
Here's a pic of the silver leather interior. Imagine how great it would look with the original Charcoal Gray Metallic paint on that '67.
Regarding rear-seat center armrests, I suspect GM did that because the top mechanism ate up significant width in the rear because the frames went into each side until '71, making the rear seat narrower than the coupes. Of course starting with the '71s the frame was different to alleviate that problem but I bet the GM bean counters wouldn't allow the armrest to return, as part of GM's continued cheapening up of their cars back then.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I wonder what kind of gains GM saw when they went to the "scissors" type mechanism for 1971?
Awhile back, I took a tape measure to my '67 Catalina, and the way I measured its shoulder room, got 62.5" in the front seat, and about 56" in the back seat, measured between the narrower area in between where the top cuts in. Looking at the sales brochures, Pontiac didn't publish shoulder room, although they did show legroom and headroom stats. I just checked the 1970 Buick brochure though, and they're showing the LeSabre convertible as only having 52.3" of shoulder room in the back! So, I wonder if GM changed the top mechanism from '67-68 to '69-70? Or, maybe I just measured wrong?
I just dug up a '71 Buick brochure, and they're showing the LeSabre convertible at 61.7" of shoulder room! So, it looks like the big '71 GM cars got about a 10" gain in shoulder room, too!
I think the '71 full-sizers had something
What are the black fold/crease areas in the car seats? Are they black leather or vinyl, or a suede-like material, do you know? Interesting contrast.
http://southjersey.craigslist.org/cto/3454361934.html
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Needs water pump=it over heats so could be more serious.
My grandma had a downsized FWD big Olds in the 80s, and she liked that car a lot, because the trunk was low, which made reversing easy. Her next cars (2x Taurus) always had her complaining about visibility.
Have some mercy - it was the fifties
I think that flat top roof line worked best on the Impala.
One of those vehicles some might say, "Who would want one?", but there it was, zipping up the salt-covered streets of Kent, OH, 50 years old or darn close.
Needless to say I passed him like he was standing still.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
I'm old-skool, but I always hated numbers as a model name of a car.
To me, the worst was the Cadillac "Series 62". They used that up to the '64 model year. You go into the dealer and say, "I want a '61 62" or "How 'bout a '64 62?" LOL
LeSabres started getting pretty big, pretentious, and luxurious by the mid 70's, so it would be easy to mistake one for an Electra. Once the 5 mph bumpers went into effect, I think they topped out around 226". An Electra wasn't that much bigger...maybe 231"? I do remember there were a few years where the Electra was actually an inch or two longer than Caddy DeVille.
I always thought the '75 LeSabre convertible was a sharp looking car. Make mine baby blue with the Buick magnum wheels. And a 455. :shades:
I can just picture that LeSabre, andre--white top and white vinyl seats with blue dash, seat belts and carpet, right?!
I remember our local eye doctor buying a firethorn-colored '76 Eldo convertible when new...white interior with red dash, etc. When I was back in town visiting a few years ago, I saw a slightly beat-up looking Eldo pull up to the intersection, top down, and it was the good Dr.! Still owned it. He was a white belt and shoe kind of guy, and somehow that Eldo seemed just right for him! Before that he had a light blue '71 Eldo convert.
Flat gray primer, Crager wheels w white stripe tires, young guy driving it. Looked like a project car.
From behind, I could see the left rear tire was about 3"-5" to the right of the left front tire. Bent frame I presume.
Bent unibody, in this case. We had a '68 Valiant for 10+ years, that thing ran forever.
My oddball was a Mk. 1 Rabbit 4-door on the way home from work yesterday (unfortunately nothing special, not a GTI). Didn't stink, so I guess it wasn't a diesel, even more unusual...
I remember when Darts and Valiants were common sights on the streets, seeing that occurrence where it was going down the street at a bit of an angle (and it always seemed like the the rear was shifted toward the right, never the left) wasn't all that rare.
Darts and Valiants had a very narrow rear track, something like 55.9" compared to around 59" up front, so I think that helped make the most minor offset more noticeable.
I always thought the size was just right for a sport sedan Chrysler version, with upscale exterior styling and a luxurious interior. It could have been Chrysler's answer to the BMW 2002.
Yep, that would be it! For some reason, I always associated that light powder/baby blue as a Buick color. Even though Pontiac, Olds, and Buick also offered it, it just seemed like it was made for Buick. I guess for Olds I always think of burgundy, and for Pontiac, sort of a brown/earthtone color.
I wonder if, for whatever reason, that color was more common on Buicks than the other cars?
I didn't know it was unibody - I thought every before the mid 70's was BOF.
We had a '68 Valiant for 10+ years, that thing ran forever.
With a Slant Six it should run forever.
The 1960-66 Imperial used the 1957-59 frame, and while the body looked very similar, it was beefed up, so the car was sort of a hybrid of unit-body on top of a frame. Similar to a current-day Honda Ridgeline or Pilot, I guess.
I wonder if some thought a 62 was an old model in 1964, just because of the name.
About bumpers - the 70s railroad ties are ugly, but you could bump to your heart's content without receiving a $1000 repair bill.
That wasn't the case with the (optional) white leather sport seats in my '86 Mustang GT convertible. They never looked clean.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
I remember in '72 visiting the Plymouth dealer here and he had a new 2-door Scamp hardtop in the showroom in a pale blue shade called "Blue Sky" with a white vinyl roof and a white vinyl interior. Sounds sort of feminine, but it really looked sharp. Back then it seemed Mopar had a lot of non-metallic pastel paints in their assortment - maybe their large taxi and fleet business required such shades.
Ford in the late '60s/early '70s sold a lot of cars in a very pale pastel blue they called Diamond Blue. I remember seeing that color everywhere, on Mustangs, Custom 500s, Fairlanes, you name it.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
My parents bought a new '74 Impala Sport Coupe (all four windows rolled down) in the last week of Aug. '74, when the dealer had received a few '75's by then. Dad wanted to avoid having to use unleaded gas. There were two '74 Impala Sport Coupes that were identically sticker priced ($4,408.00), but one was maroon with a white painted top and had the black and white herringbone cloth interior (like a nice sport coat!), and the other was a pastel light green (with white painted top) that resembled baby diarrhea to me. It had a nice pattern cloth light green interior. I wanted the maroon one so bad it hurt, but Dad picked the pastel green one.
Come to think of it, when he bought our '77 Impala coupe, I wanted the firethorn coupe in the showroom that was $200 more and had a 350 4-barrel instead of a 305. Dad didn't want four barrels or to spend $200 more (sigh). I guess I've become my old man.
That sports coat fabric on the inside didn't impress me much. We had previously owned '63 and '69 Impalas and their interiors were much nicer than the '74. By then GM was moving the Impala downmarket some and the Caprice was becoming their equivalent car to the older Impala. I remember thinking the fact that the bench seats didn't have a section of vinyl in the center of the seat seemed really cheap, like the older BelAirs and Biscaynes of the '60s.
We didn't keep it long and dad replaced it with a Hornet Sportabout. Later on he bought a '79 Impala 4-door, also from his friend at Budget, in Dark Carmine Metallic with red cloth inside, which was a much nicer car than the '74.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Chevrolet/1974_Chevrolet/1974_Chevrolet- _Full_Size/1974%20Chevrolet%20Full%20Size-08.html
I liked the seats, especially the way the rear seat looked like a 'couch' in the coupes...large, full-length-and-depth armrests on the side panels and 'filler' panels on each end of the back seat back...but didn't like all the black plastic on the instrument panel that year. At least the steering wheel was color-keyed that year, unlike the older Impalas of that generation.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I never liked on the '73 and '74, how the side molding went over top of the front wheel opening and right up to the front of the car.
BTW, the '74 full wheelcovers were the '70 wheelcover. I never knew Chevy to do that before. Similarly, the '75 Monza Towne Coupe wheelcovers were early-Corvair.
One thing I never realized is that when they killed off the BelAir in the US in '76 they introduced an Impala S stripper model that was much the same. Here in Canada the BelAir lived on for a few years more.
GM afflicted the Impala with that sport cloth material for years, starting I believe in '73. By '76 they had changed the pattern a bit and it looked like a Herb Tarlek sports coat.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6