-September 2024 Special Lease Deals-
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
2024 Chevy Blazer EV lease from Bayway Auto Group Click here
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee lease from Mark Dodge Click here
2025 Ram 1500 Factory Order Discounts from Mark Dodge Click here
Comments
Not too many cloth models made, but of course those could have been produced before (if?) they stopped making them, in theory anyway.
-juice
CRaig
Mark
If you search on Fitz you'll find 30 or so at times. More than one of every single color.
-juice
These 2 cars are not rated #1 and 2 recommended mid size SUV becaues they are not as good as the Tribeca. CR would take into consideration if a hybrid was bad, or the batteries polluted landfills and all the other bs. I have not read/heard about needing replacement batteries often or that they are that expensive. From what I understood was that they last the avg amount a person would keep the car and i thought up to 10 yrs. At that point its like replacing anything in a car including the normal batter and if they are so expensive which later down the road they wont be as muchi'm sure the dealer will offer discount to someone who bought a model fromt them that would need a new expensive battery. Again , i'm sure this is exageratted.
Also, you have to take in the consideration the tax break pre 2006 and after which you get.
talking hybrids in general is one thing, but dont use the crappy Ford Escape hybrid. Ford sucks period.
If you are talking B9's competition in mid size suv's then i state again the Rx400h and Hybrid Highlander are consumer reports #1 & 2 even over thier non hybrid version of exact same car for a reason.
There is little to no cons with the current hybrids from Toyota/Lexus and many pro's.
Good news is that since Toyota bought GM's stake in Subaru from them, maybe they will make a hybrid Tribeca.
I can accept that the top 2 models I listed are better then the Tribeca but that doesnt mean they were for me at the time. As I've stated before if i had to pick again today, it would come down to the Murano & the Tribeca with the B9 sitll edging it out for me for various different and personal reasons.
So, I'm not remorsed that I didnt' buy the Rx400h or hybrid highlander at all but I can't say I would mind getting the mpg, and improved HP, engine performance etc. they get out of their V6's in the Tribeca as opposed to its current specs.
give me a rough estimate on how much that is costing so I have an idea for if I ever do something similiar. oops saw the posting on the price, and now I may want to ask you where you got them.
More importantly let us know how the ride is with the 20 in. wheels and tires because I know with the Infiniti FX they said not to get the optional 20" wheels or the Fx45 at all (which they come standard) as the 20's made the ride significantly worse thent he 18's, I hope they same is not for the Tribeca as not only do I think it will ook great but maybe add some height? and make it look tougher andmore truck like.
Incidentally, he also said the B9 Tribeca's selling pretty well at their dealership - certainly good news.
It will tighten up the steering response of the car with the lower profile tires since there is less sidewall... but I am not expecting too much change in the ride stiffness as I would guess more of that is in the suspension then the tire being already 18in with 65 profiles to start with....
the wheels hopefully are lighter so it that affects how fast the wheel settles also some affect on acceleration as less weight to get moving.
I'm having fun playing with the Sport mode. Seems to cut down the (I think somewhat excess) downshifting a bit. The sticky feel to the Sport mode is odd at first. One downside is that it doesn't upshift readily at freeway speeds so it revs too high once you get around 65mph (or is that upside/downshift - getting my directional bearings confused). Haven't had it long enough to get a feel for the gas mileage but am nervous about it. First tank came through at 16mpg but with hardly any freeway driving. The Manual mode is too much work for not enough fun.
Anybody have any experience with Sport mode and knows how it affects feel and mileage? And I want to try maybe 89 octane but am concerned about voiding the warranty.
You do know Ford gets the hybrid technology right from Toyota, right?
There is little to no cons with the current hybrids from Toyota/Lexus and many pro's.
Right. And you can turn water into fuel. I'll believe that.
There is no such technology as all pros and no cons. As of today, the added cost of hybrids (comapre regular Highlander to Hybrids) does not offset any benefits it brings. Not until gas is much more expensive anyway.
tincup47, "Both Ford, Nissan buy Toyota's Hybrid System!" #127, 7 Apr 2004 3:25 pm
In other news, Most Hybrid Vehicles Not as Cost-Effective as They Seem
But that's a discussion for one of the Hybrid Vehicles forums.
Steve, Host
Craig
BTW, my car doesn't have any problems upshifting into 5th gear -- in fact, it's not really any different than normal mode in that regard if you are driving normally. The only time sport mode delays upshifts noticeably is at full throttle. But in a cruise condition it slips into 5th just like normal mode.
Craig
Dennis
Don't worry about voiding the warranty - premium is recommended not required. Can't use lower octanes in the turbo engines, but the H6 will take it. I think most folks on this forum have determined that the slight decrease in mileage negates any price savings when you purchase non-premium fuel, though.
From a dollar and sense point of view a Hybrid at this time is a looser financially. There is no way to recover the cost over the typical ownership period.
I believe the Toyota warranty on the batteries is 8 years which is excellent. But the average driver would have to keep the car for about 8 years to save enough on gas to pay the higher price. Now after that when you replace the batteries at approximately $4000 - you are back in the same hole.
When there is a real financial benefit I'll be the first to buy one.
As for the potential pollution from the fabricating & disposal of the batteries, do you really think the industry is going to advertise what those puppies do to the environment? I'm not saying do not buy a hybrid because the batteries contaminate. What I am saying - if you are buying hybrid to be environmentally responsible - then examine the aspect of the hybrid.
A good analogy: is the wealthy patron how attends an environmental fund raiser and then fly’s home alone in his Gulfstream that created more pollution & used more fuel in the two hour fight than hundreds of hybrid cars do. His intentions were good - but he does more harm than he does good. But he feels good about his actions.
riverhawk: congrats!
Sirius radio - if you have NAV and DVD, there's an aux input in the back. That gives you flexibility - you could put it almost anywhere. Other options include under the passenger seat or in the glove box, but then the installer would have to find a way to plug it in.
Hybrid batteries likely won't cost $4000, but CR calculated a break-even point and concluded most people never will.
Another thing they don't factor - you don't pay MSRP for the gas models. So the actual difference is higher than just the difference in MSRP. On a Highlander, that is a HUGE amount, you might get $3 grand off MSRP in a Limited model.
-juice
Fitzmall has a Highlander Limited for $30,445, with an MSRP of $35,708. So I was way off, sorry. The discount is more than $3 grand, it's a bit over $4 grand actually.
The cheapest Hybrid Limited they have is $38,149. So re-do the math starting with a price premium of nearly $8 grand. Ouch. You'll never catch up, and by the time you do you'll need to replace those batteries.
I do hope Subaru considers a hybrid or maybe even a diesel model, but one would hope the real-world price premium would be a heck of a lot less than $8 grand. For $2 grand, I'd be interested. Subaru needs to cut that by 3/4ths.
-juice
Right now that is one of the arguments that reviewers are using against hybrids. Namely, that it is selling at list price, and that it will take 8 - 10 years to recoup the savings on gas. The argument for hybrids is that while they may not save much $$ at the moment, they do offer slightly better performance and gas mileage now.
Mark
Price - right now hybrids cost more but as the technlogy advances and becomes more common, the price for the technology will drop.
Battery Replacement - same applies here. Replacement is expensive today but will drop as it becomes more common.
Environmental Impact - everyone seems to think that depleted batteries are going to be dumped somewhere and cause damage. These batteries will be recycled in an environmentally friendly manner. Impact will be minimal.
Payback Time - not every buyer of a hybird is in it for the payback. Some do it for the principal of the act. Kind of buying recycled copy paper, lumber from renewable sources or brown instead of bleached coffee filters. It costs more up front and you never recover the cost. But it makes you feel good.
Consumers should wait for demand to level off, or for supply to increase (Tribeca Hybrid anyone?), before they buy.
Timing is everything, and buying now is poor timing.
-juice
PS Just read Rob's response, and I agree - wait until the pricing drops and it makes more sense
Don't get me wrong, I think hybrid technology IS the future. It makes our car more efficient by turning those wasted energy (heat generated by brakes) into power (electricity). I have no doubt 10 years from now, most new cars on sale will be hybrids. But right now, it is not a financially sound alternative to gas powered cars. If it makes you feel good, by all means buy yourself one.
Is that 38K price the the MSRP or those include the dealer over sticker premium.
I do not know of any dealers that sell hybrids without adding 2 to 3 thousand over sticker.
What annoys me is the federal gov't push for hybrids. They're legislating a specific technology, rather than just rewarding for better mileage- however it's achieved.
On a separate note, they don't offer much advantage for highway driving.
I'm looking at driving ~15-18k miles each year, at around 18 or so mpg, which is about 850-1000 gallons of gas. At the current local prices of gas (almost $3/gal) that's around $2500-$3000 each year I would spend on gas for a non-hybrid. I'm thinking you might pay off the difference a little sooner that 16 years.
Toyota's has a very cool web site for info in hybrids, and there is a fuel calculator there. When I input 18000 mile/year at $2.90/gal for 18.0 mpg, here is what it gives me:
Estimated cost for my car/year = $2900.00
Estimated cost for a 4x2 Highland Hybrid = $1800.00
Estimated annual savings = $1100.00
YMMV - You could conceivably break just about break even in 6 or 8 years. Combined with the idea of doing the "right thing", this would be worth it to me.
-Karen in AZ-
That really depends. If I know that used car needs a $4k battery pack soon, I won't pay much for it. Try sell a car today that needs transimission rebuild (only cost about $2k) and see what your resale vaule is.
Estimated cost for a 2x4 non-hybreb highland = $2088.00
Estimated cost for a 4x2 Highland Hybrid = $1800.00
Estimated annual savings = $288.00
It will take a long time to save $8k. So buy the non-hybred and save $8k up front and get slightly better milage than current 18mpg.
--jay
That's because the technology has environmental elements built in as well. It's more than just MPG.
Robert B
5 Dr. Limited B9
I would say the 16 years is way high, however-
Keep in mind the calculator is using your real world MPG and the MPG rating from Toyota - we all know those estimates are high by about 20%, also you are driving an AWD vs their 2WD. So there they are probably getting another 10% advantage over your B9.
So in reality - without adding the cost of new batteries - you are probably still looking at 7 to 8 or more years to break even. How many people keep a car that long? Not many.
Also, someone said a hybrid would potentially be worth more. Maybe, it depends on it age. If the car is within 2 or 3 years of the battery warranty expiration, it would be worth much less than a non hybrid because of the anticipated cost to replace the batteries.
So as someone said if you want to spend 8K to feel good - go for it. I rather give the money to cancer research or battered women and really feel knowing I made a difference.
The other tech out there now is diesel; it's been interesting following the Liberty discussion; not only are diesel prices over $3 a gallon in lots of the US but apparently there's a lot of tinkering involved with adding various additives depending on the season, weather, temperature, who's ahead in the NFL.
Of course the hybrid folks are way tuned in to their driving habits so they can squeeze every last mile, even if it means coasting (illegally) downhill in traffic.
I just use my mostly ignored Subaru for grocery runs and manage to only need a fill up every other month -- maybe a golf cart would pay for itself in 8 years, but I'll be green in other ways in lieu of early adopting a hybrid or diesel rig right now.
No Subaru Chat tomorrow night - sorry. Audi bought out the Thursday edition (hey, it's AWD talk - stop in).
Steve, Host
John: I compared a no-haggle dealer's actual prices. Surprisingly, they were below MSRP for the Highlander hybrid. Even so, $8 grand? That's a lot of gas, even at today's prices, which are likely to drop (government estimates have them leveling off at around $2.4x or so).
Resale might be better, but then you have even less time to break-even. At some point you'll take a hit. It could be right if the batteries need replacing, as mentioned above.
Example: a mid 90s Legacy with an air bag suspension cost more when new, but if the suspension is saggy, it loses a *lot* of value because the cost of new air bags is high.
Karen: 18k miles per year? Do you ever park, or do you nap at the wheel? :P
Last I read the average female does 9k/year, males do 15k. But you have to plug in your own amount of miles. Mine is low - about 9k/year for my people mover, since I operate two vehicles.
That's why I'd also look at other benefits - like extended range, HOV lane access, lower emissions, silent operation at idle, tax credits, etc.
I'd like to see Subaru give the Tribeca great range and consider the possibility of including a generator for power outages.
-juice
She didn't want to look at the B9 becuase it's the first year the model is out. She insists on waiting at least a year. Maybe by then I can get her to get her license and we can go for the B9 hybrid?
Mark
I to was comparing the Tribeca with the Pilot.
The reason I chose the Tribeca over the Honda for following reasons:
1. I wanted DVD and NAV (Honda not an option for both)
2. Honda's ride great but you lose some road feel and what the vehicles limits are, the Tribeca has secure feeling that translates the road conditions flawlessley.
3. Even though Honda a great reliability, I have higher trust for Subaru.
4. Everyone has a Pilot.
5. Liked the sportier look of the Tribeca.
But your choice you probably won't go wrong with either one.
No info on the Nissan
tls
Wondering if you considered the MDX since the DVD/NAV would be available and still have the Honda reliability you mentioned? I am a Tribeca fan, just comparing similar models myself. Although, like you, I don't want what everyone else has.
Thanks.
I've used it now for a week and love it. I am trying to figure out where the 4 corners of the car end. I always think the car is bigger than it really is but am being cautious. A dent would be a tragedy!
-Brian
Jerry
The center console is a perfect setup for an MP3 player with the dual power outlets and the cutout for the cords. If only it had an aux input in it it would be perfect.
FM modulator is out of the question.
I noticed that B9's that don't come with DVD still have the aux button on the radio. I was wondering if it isn't as easy as connecting to an open connector in the back of the head unit to make it work.
"The 7 pass cloth are still an option, just very low production volume right now. The dealer may have a hard time locating one but can always order if they don't mind the wait. On a similar note, it seems the 5 pass LTD's are really taking off right now. I don't know if it is because of the available Nav now or not. Seems interesting how they switched model mix so quickly."
So that's a definite YES! You can get a base (cloth) 7-passenger Tribeca.
1. I wanted DVD and NAV (Honda not an option for both)
2. Honda's ride great but you lose some road feel and what the vehicles limits are, the Tribeca has secure feeling that translates the road conditions flawlessley.
3. Even though Honda a great reliability, I have higher trust for Subaru.
4. Everyone has a Pilot.
5. Liked the sportier look of the Tribeca. >>>
Beyond the "feel" the B9 has a far better AWD system. The Pilot is only a part time AWD and if bad weather driving is important, then the still excellent Pilot is NOT in the same class as the B9. How reviewers manage to overlook this again and again is beyond me. Don't they realize that the AWD elements are key for many buyers?
RB
I have a 5 passenger Limited without DVD. It's really hard to get a good look at the back of the head unit, especially the upper half. You can pop off the trim piece on the bottom of the passenger side of the console. I've done some looking with a flashlight and an inspection mirror in hope of finding an open connector. No luck so far.
Craig
That is oh so true.
Subaru has yet to really get that point across in their marketing. They've tried, for sure, but haven't succeeded here. This is the area that separates Subaru from the rest of the other AWD cars out there.
Bob
But I also think that the majority of us who are willing to put our money into this platform have already done so. The first time I saw Subaru's AWD promotion in their literature, it sold the idea to me. Not CR. Not other reviewers. Certainly, these helped, but Subaru's efforts pushed my "buy" button just fine.
There are vast numbers of buyers who love cushy Toyota boat rides and Honda efficiency and reliability. They could care less about the nitty gritty design details.
John
Of course then you have to ask, does that even qualify it as an SUV?
-juice