Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
BTW, good job on the pics.
TagMan
Coming from BMW's over the last 13 years, the interior is indeed a sight to behold.
The 545 is sooo drab, but then again I didn't lease it for its interior aesthetics, but to outrun ol' smokey. :shades:
They had some nice shots of the MDX on Motor Week yesterday, and I was impressed by the fine job Acura did-looked great in silver.
Most impressive was I didn't notice any significant body lean when it was being driven hard at the track.
I have yet to see one negative review. :surprise:
This will indeed IMO, be the luxury mid-sized SUV to be reckoned with, if people can see the vehicle for what it truly is and stifle their status bias.
A warning shot has just been fired directly at BMW, Audi and Porsche, no doubt about it.
Now let's see if Acura can perform another miracle-this time on the RL.
Well, 2 weeks and my football season is over.
That didn't take long! :sick:
Maybe Acura has a mid-cycle update coming for the RL as this interior is quite eye-catching. It's not quite Audi Q7 grade, but it is leaps and bounds over the previous annonymous interior styling. And better than some SUV's in it's class, particularly the SRX, Lexus GX and better than some high-zoot SUV's like the Navigator(what are they thinking on the '07 model, inside and out?) QX56, and the LC/LX(no doubt due in part to them being 12 years old, but Toyota supposedly has a plan for these two to keep the off-road prowess and newfound trend into on-road pleasure).
One question tho: Why did they leave the gear shifter crooked? That little caveat is an eye sore to someone who studies interior quality/design as seriously as I do. The fake wood does have a sort of matte/dark finish to it, so it takes some of the sting away from being faux. And if Acura keeps prices steady(a Honda norm), and keeps the promise of the MDX not being shared with the next-gen Pilot(or Oddessey), then the MDX could and should prove more successful than the current model..
The main reason I like the MDX is because the third row seats are sold as a standard feature.
Other automakers sell a third row as an option and will let custotomers pay through their noses for that feature. Just watch out for the new X5 pricing for a third row seat ( I guarantee you it wont be cheap). Also I used to favor the X5 over other SUVs because the 3.0 was sold with a stick. Unfortunately that will not be the case for the new generation X5.
In fact a MDX with a third row is far more practical for my family driving needs than our 5 series wagon. Unfortunately I am not that practical.
The 545 is sooo drab, but then again I didn't lease it for its interior asthetics, but to outrun ol' smokey
After owning BMWs for 8 years with the intention of owning my current and soon to be BMW for another 8 years I think by 2015 I will be ready to buy a non-BMW. Look out for my presence in the upcoming Edmunds 2015 Lexus LS forum :P
Yes, but I couldn't resist a poke due to your statement about fake wood.
Well, 2 weeks and my football season is over.
That didn't take long!
I'm with you. The Raiders are the WORST, so I'll just stay focused on the 49ers for a while. At least they won today. It's cool having so many pro teams here.
TagMan
And tackiest off all in a luxury auto.
There is nobody and I repeat nobody ( Acura executive or non-Acura executive) who can justify fake wood in the MDX.
It's atrocious and inexcusable!
Hard to say about the RL. Honda\Acura mid-cycle updates are typically very minor. The inside of the Q7 is basically an A6, so it leads this class. The MDX is now very competitive though with the SRX, ML, X5, XC90, and the rest. The MDX probably has the best shot of taking the RX's #1 title.
The new Navigator is horrific. Just more proof that Lincoln has absolutely no idea what it's doing, and is just throwing darts in the dark.
Maybe this girl can cook like Aunt Jemima, but she has the appeal of Rosie McDonald!
Looks aren't everything.
Especially when you look like that... :sick:
Funny how every Acura has a fly in the Preperation H?
TSX (no torque), TL (FWD), RL (No V8, small interior), MDX (from blotted look to plate-mail look).....
I can hear a Lexus engineer sleeping, if not snoring, quite soundly tonite.
This from an pristine Acura Integra owner, which attracts only fly "Honeys"!
But, they do have good Nav sytems.
And are not Lincolns!
DrFill
Yeah, at the $40K+ level, it should be real, I agree. Real wood doesn't automatically make a good interior though. Take the outgoing Escalade, for example. The wood was real, but it still looked like a Silverado on the inside.
I still think I like the new X5's interior better.
M
I'm with you . . . the fake wood I could live with, given it's mid-price range, but the Gladiator grill has got to go.
And . . . just look at that beautiful X5 interior!
TagMan
Oh god yes. Have you seen those gauges? They're right out of something that was on the road before I was born! The grille looks like chicken wire most of the time. Ford obviously didn't have enough money to redesign the whole platform for all their large suvs so they've resorted to a "facelift" to face the newer models from Cadillac and others.
M
TagMan
M
We may need to change your moniker :P
DrFill
I've liked Acuras since 1986 (day one) in some form or another. The original legends and especially the 1995 GS version really put Acura in with me. Of course there have been some dour years, especially after the "Legend" left the lineup, but that is another story.
M
On the MDX, what I've come up with is Acura's usual restraint. They don't won't to over do it, but they don't sweat the details enough to make a potential buyer go "wow", much unlike an Audi or Lexus or MB GL buyer would do. The fake wood is a bit of a let down, especially with the brand being reported saying that they are wanting to take the MDX up market. But if they've improved the handling dynamics and have eliminated that floaty ride, it may be worth a look.
And to boot, with a Cadillac dealer usually very close to the Lincoln dealer it will be very hard to:
Move the MKS= CTS
Move the MKZ= SRX
Move the Navigator= Escalade
Move the T/C= America's fav. domestic, the DTS
And the LS doesn't stand a chance against an STS
Well when MB saw that the demand for the E320 CDI started to exceed supply, things got pretty interesting at DCX. So much so that they've put a ML, GL, S, and even some 300 and Charger Bluetec Chryslers through the ringer with the EPA to get certification. And with the outcry for more fuel efficient cars in all classes, the automakers have gotten the technology to the table faster than expected.
So now there are addendums and by-laws attached in an attempt to smack down the car guys. But they're not going away easily.
You've got automakers collaborating on diesel-electric technology. You've got an automaker that has just poured an extra $1B in it's HSD program. And it goes on and on.
With the EPA actually asking makers to have an override to not let the car start if it's deemed not efficient enough is a testament of how far they'd go. Well the damage is done. Where were they in the last 100 years??
M
I just came to realize another why American car companies can't make any headway, they don't stick to anything. Who comes out with a car and changes the name and facelifts it for the second model year? This is the case with the Zephyr. I mean doesn't that confuse buyers and make the first year car something of an orphan? They'll run with a nameplate for a few redesigns and then dump it, usually after they're ruined it anyway so I guess I can see why they change, but it is still a defeatism practice.
The only real bright spot, IMO is that new crossover , the MK something.
M
If I were purchasing an SUV, it is the driveability of the new MDX being compared to Porsche and BMW, rather than a thin strip of test tube "wood" that would be enhancing my decision.
I have driven the 4.4 and it was superb.
That's where you will find some beautiful wood.
I would imagine Acura designers in attempting to bring the vehicle away from its staid exterior got carried away and made it a bit too garish.
Still not a deal breaker, IMO.
It is very nice, but there still is a bit of "tiny button syndrome" despite the iDrive, and I'm not crazy about that shifter, though its better than the ML's stubby column shifter.
I think the idea is to use forced induction with the Duratec 35, rather than the V8. How long the S80 will offer the V8 is in question. Ford wants to kill use of the Yamaha V8, because of its expense. The only option I see is to either switch to the AJ-V8, or kill the S80 V8 entirely.
I just came to realize another why American car companies can't make any headway, they don't stick to anything. Who comes out with a car and changes the name and facelifts it for the second model year?
This was brought up in a C&D ed piece a few months back. They mentioned that both Accord and Camry have been on sale in the U.S. for almost 30 years. Sales have always been good, and neither has required a name change.
The only real bright spot, IMO is that new crossover , the MK something.
The MKX, which is a Ford Edge clone. I'm sure Lincoln in their infinite wisdom will come up with a way to ruin any chance of success, count on the interior designers for that.
3 points in 2 games. :sick:
I know one way it will play out . . . Show me a really nice diesel SUV, and it's mine. I'll be an instant buyer . . . no discount required! Only condition is that it is not humongous.
TagMan
For '07(late), the V10 gets a messaged 5.0L TDI, in excess of 325hp/530lb-ft of torque thanks to the use of trick piezo injectors for a more sophisticated and instantaneous fuel delivery(in other words, this is the same stuff MB is installing on the new Bluetecs, so no more cold-start up clatter and the smoke is history). The suspension system has been recalibrated for more refinement, and the interior has been cranked up a notch even further, definetely not lacking in that department.
BTW: I can't think of one 5k pound SUV that can get 20/26mpg earned EPA city/highway.
I forgot to mention the all-important third-row requirement . . . which makes the MB GL with the upcoming diesel the only contender I know of so far . . . unless that beautiful X5 finally goes diesel, or the upcoming diesel VW gets a third row.
TagMan
link title
TagMan
Was that article written before or after they tested the BMW335i?
Audi has recently scrubbed the notion of the V8 diesel that they use in the Euro markets as it would prove useless to retrofit it for the now-stringent US emission laws.
With that being said, the company says it will now use the same V10-TDI from VW(Porsche is also said to use this engine) that is ready for sale 45 states right now. But the racing -derived V12 TDI is still own, along with a sportier Q7 with a hi-po version of Audi's new CPRI 4.2L V8 that they'll use in the new A8.
BTW: The Sport and TDI version will get DSG. How cool is that?
link title
They also mentioned that they will increase production for the US market by 25%, thanks in no small part to the launch of the new Tundra(as ugly as it may be) and it's heavy-duty variants, a first for a US market Toyota pick-up.
The projected rankings for worldwide domination will end as follows:
The General: 13.9%
Toyota: 12.3%
Ford: 12.0%
Yes folks, Toyota will beat Ford worldwide. They also said that that there will be a major shift towards Eastern Europe and China, areas that GM absolutely dominates. By 2010, if GM stays on it's steady pace and Toyota's output actually works, Toyota would become #1, reports suggests.
Where do you get your info? To my knowledge, Toyota already surpassed GM since early 2006 (world market).
The news that Toyota just surpassed Ford and reached No.2 was regarding US sales.
What is Toyota without reliability and quality? Obviously nothing more than a GM! I guess it's really tough being number one.
The greatest competitive advantage for any auto company is not to have any dealings with the UAW. Fortunately Toyota is not drowned by humungous healthcare/pension legacy costs.
Believe blkhemi's numbers are correct.
Created by the Detroit office of Omnicom Group's BBDO, the "Dr. Z" campaign cost $100 million and has been running since July. It relies on Mr. Zetsche, with his distinctive, bushy mustache and German accent, for a light-hearted setting of a somewhat complicated message about how Chrysler cars share engineering and design features with higher-priced Mercedes sedans, or how Jeep SUVs are clean and fuel efficient.
But the ads have become the butt of scorn from some ad critics, even though industry research shows the ads were memorable. Critics often pointed to studies showing that many people believed Dr. Z wasn't a real person. Detroit area resident Carrie Belcher, who has a Jeep Grand Cherokee and Volkswagen Passat in her family, said she assumed he was a fake character and was surprised to learn he was DaimlerChrysler's CEO. But she said the ads made her laugh. "I thought it was kind of fun that the CEO was that quirky and funny," she said. (Mr. Zetsche does have a doctorate in engineering.)
The Chrysler Group vigorously defends the ads, saying the campaign did its job of informing consumers about what Chrysler stands for.
The TV, radio and print portions of the Dr. Z campaign are currently suspended so the company can focus on its clearance sale and new model launches over the next two months
SOURCE: WALL STREET JOURNAL SEPT 18 2006
The A.E. was on them from day one about those terrible ads. According to Pete, the ads have actually cost DCX more than $200m, without increasing showroom traffic one iota.
Ford is in big, big trouble. They are slashing (another?) 30K jobs, and closing several more plants as part of "Way Forward 2.0, Mulally addition". They still depend much to heavily on the F-150 and their trucks. The market is going to drop out right under the Explorer. Expedition? Fuggetaboutit. Mercury is done for. Literally no new products until something like 2012.
But, interestingly, nobody thinks about it. They only remember the Ford Explorer's tires, which Ford didn't even manufacture!
Toyota can do no wrong it would seem, even when a colossal 1.75 million cars worldwide could have lost their steering!
Go figure.
TagMan
Its not as if Ford had no clue that tire problems could happen. They didn't want to pay for safe tires.
As for Toyota, read the Edmunds article, Perception is reality. People are willing to give Toyota the benefit of the doubt that they are serious about fixing the recent quality issues, because of their sterling Toyota = quality reputation. The domestics made junk for 20 years, so its a bit harder for them to say "you gotta listen to us, I know we've said this every year for the last 20 years, but the cars really are good now.