Chevy Venture

1252628303149

Comments

  • juliansjulians Member Posts: 42
    I am thinking about buying a new 2003 Venture. After reading this site I become concerned about Gasket stuff. Did GM put better gaskets in the 2003 models? Once repaired (older Ventures), did the Gaskets give trouble again?
  • boatnut1boatnut1 Member Posts: 3
    I own a 2002 Venture LS Extended, nice van, am happy with it. One thing I would like to improve is the headlights, has anyone experimented with stronger bulbs. What about xenon bulbs or the cool blues? Can I put a higher wattage bulb in the place of the standard bulbs? If I can, what is the maximum wattage advisable for the Ventures electrical system? Thanks for the info!!!!

    On a side note, our Venture has the 8 passenger option which my wife and I love. We have 2 kids, each one has an outer bucket, the middle seat is reserved for a removable toy bin. If we need to carry one more person we remove the bin temporarily and still have loads of storage space in back. Before we bought this Venture we test drove a 2001 Venture with the standard seating. We put both our kids in the middle seat, but the kids were too close to each other; constantly arguing. So it's nice to separate them. My two cents worth.
  • kkollwitzkkollwitz Member Posts: 274
    I understand from other Venture boards that 2003 models do have an improved gasket. It may not yet be available as a replacement part for older models, because the assembly line gets first claim on them.
    I have a 99 Venture which had a gasket leak which has been stopped by using GM cooling system tablets designed for the Cadillac aluminum block V8s. If I were to do it all over again, I'd put the tabs in the cooling system when I bought the car as a preventive measure.
  • john888john888 Member Posts: 15
    Anyone shopped for the 2003 AWD EXT WB edition around New York/Long Island areas? If so, what prices did you get and from which dealer and salesman? Thanks for any help you can lend.
  • offhamoffham Member Posts: 344
    Re #1379. I have put in the halogen bulbs, I think they are Philips from memory. Tried the cool blue and not that good. if you look on the packaging you will find that the wattage output is the same for all of them 45/55 or 65, not sure exactly.

    First impression, was they were not much better, but adjusted the lamp upwards and gives a longer beam on main. Walmart are about the cheapest
  • mizeumlmizeuml Member Posts: 50
    Go to the GM Triplets Board to see more details on my experience with the intake manifold gasket. Just got mine fixed today on my 2002 Montana. I asked the service advisor about this problem and he said the 3.1 and 3.4 engines all have the leaking gasket. Some leak coolant like my '99 did and some leak oil like my '02 was doing. I asked about if the gasket had been improved on the 2003 models, but he did not think so. He seemed pretty knowledgeable on the subject, but maybe he has not heard. He did say that once the gasket has been replaced, they rarely leak again. Guess I was lucky that mine failed at 14k miles.
  • cobrastkcobrastk Member Posts: 3
    The vehicle was purchased on 03/21/02 with a 24 Month 24,000 Mile service warranty. On 10/11/02, the vehicle was turned in for repairs with an overheat problem, as well as a leak and radiator fans inoperative. The leak was traced to a head gasket leak by a service technician and myself. To continue on with the trip, stop leak was added to keep the system from failing and the fans were directly wired to avoid overheating because of cooling problems.

    I explained the circumstances to the service department including all details. When the vehicle was picked up, they stated that the Water Pump had failed, and that an Intake Manifold gasket was leaking. I disputed that the head gasket should have been checked and possibly changed because both the service shop and myself verified this as being a problem. It was explained that they had found no intrusions of water in the oil or leaks in that area, but the fact that there was stop leak placed into the vehicle as a stop gap measure would have hidden the leak, therefore, inspection should have taken place.
    On Friday, 03 Jan, the low water indicator came on as well as the Service Engine light. Water level was checked and there was no loss of coolant or overheat indications. The next morning, I had a service department check the Service Engine light and the code identified Spark Plugs and Wires. While changing the plugs, I noticed that one of them was wet. I continued with the spark plug change and the Service Engine light remained on. Water levels were still good with no signs of leaking or overheating. All shops were closed so no further troubleshooting of the Service Engine light could be performed.
    On Monday, 05 Jan, the vehicle was turned in for service with an explanation of the circumstances. It was discovered on Tuesday that the water pump had failed and the mechanic believed the head gasket had cracked as well and requested that the motor be changed because of residual damage that normally occurs when this happens. The Warranty company requested that this be verified by removing the head and checking for warpage and if it were, would refer to the abuse and neglect clause in the contract and void warranty service. The Service Dept requested approval of work in the amount of $887.00 and if the head was not warped, the warranty would cover it, otherwise it was my dime. With very little alternative, I approved the work knowing that odds were against the head not being warped with the history of the prior service work.
    Now, the head is warped and they are estimating almost $5000.00 to replace the entire motor. My argument is as follows.
    1. There were no signs of overheating during this incident; however, overheating was identified in the incident in October. A request was placed at that time to verify the Head Gasket was not damaged.
    2. The failure of the Water Pump to supply coolant to the Cylinder Head, a warranty item that was replaced in October. This would easily cause the Low Coolant light to illuminate.
    3. There were absolutely no signs of an overheat condition at any time during this incident. The only indications were the Low Coolant warning indicator and the Service Engine light illuminating. No coolant levels were low or showed any leakage/overheat signs. All cooling fans were and are operational and were running.
    There has been no abuse of this vehicle by us and all measures were taken to prevent any serious damage.
    After speaking the Warranty distributor, they explained that the information that they had received stated that the vehicle was making noise when it was delivered. This is not true. Reality is that the vehicle actually ran fine, it just had the indicator lights on. He also stated that there was no mention in the information presented to them that there had been another water pump failure, yet the service department had informed me that it had.
    Does anyone have any idea how I can get some help on this matter.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Quick question, what year Venture do you drive? A little known feature of the GM Triplets, is the engine "limp home mode" feature. This overheated engine protection operating mode, allows the engine to run should an overheated engine condition exist. It alternates firing groups of three cylinders to help prevent engine damage. You will notice a significant loss of engine power and performance. This is in the owners manual, section 5 , for 1997 to at least 2001 (My brother's Montanas, so I assume Venture also). So it would be hard to "abuse" an engine designed to run without coolant. And you do not speak of this condition, so you may have never got that hot.
    It sounds like you are making progress by talking to the warranty company. Another possiblity would be a claim against the maker of the first water pump. Good luck, keep us posted.
  • 33chevy33chevy Member Posts: 28
    We purchased ours in Feb of 2000. Found out from this site about a recall on the power sliding door. No notification from GM. Took to local Chevy dealer ( where I didn't purchase it from). They looked up VIN number and recall applied to ours. They were surprised I got no notification from GM. Never had any trouble with the door before the new part put on and none since. I hate to say this but we have had no problems at all with the van. It has performed flawless and hope by saying so since it is now out of warrenty that I haven't put a whammy on it!
  • jodar96jodar96 Member Posts: 400
    I hope this article saves some of you money.

    GM extends warranty
    Automotive News / February 17, 2003

     
    DETROIT -- California regulators say General Motors must extend its warranty for fuel injection systems to 10 years/200,000 miles on about 700,000 1996-2001 model year SUVs, pickups and minivans sold in the state, Reuters reported.

    GM says more than 75 percent of the vehicle owners may never experience a problem and most of the rest have had the problem fixed. The state says the faulty fuel injection systems were brought to GM's attention four years ago. The automaker agreed then to extend the warranty to clean the systems to 10 years/100,000 miles from the previous 3 years/50,000 miles.

    GM will provide a free cleaning of the fuel injection system for any customer who experiences problems. It will cover the estimated $115 per vehicle cost. If customers have a second fuel injection system failure, GM will replace the parts at a cost ranging from $300 to $350 per vehicle.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    http://www.auto.com/industry/iwirf12_20030212.htm

    The engine is the 4.3L, so the only minivan that uses it is the Chevrolet Astro or GMC Safari. Venture is not involved.
  • letsgetmikeyletsgetmikey Member Posts: 82
    I also had the problem of the wipers hitting each other on my Silhouette.

    I just replaced the blades and put a 22" blade on the passenger side, instead of the 24". I did put a 24" on the drivers' side.

    Now they don't hit, and I can't tell much of a difference in the wiper coverage on that side of the windshield.

    Mikey
  • cobrastkcobrastk Member Posts: 3
    No I was not aware of a Limp Home Mode but it did get to that point according to my wife. It sounds to me that even if it did overheat it would be hard to destroy the heads.

    To add to this, it was explained to me by the Service Manager at that they could not perform a pressure check on the failed water pump until they could pressurize the system. However, being as the head was removed this could not be performed. Due to financial reasons, I chose to remove the vehicle from the department until I could afford to get it repaired.

    Once I got the vehicle at home, I took a look under the hood. I noticed that they had removed the rear head for inspection even though I had explained to them that the number 2 piston is where I found the wetness on the spark plug, which is on the front head. The cost of this removal and inspection was roughly $887.00 whereas the front head would have been a cheaper removal according to the Mitchell Guide. I also took note that they did not remove any water spillage from the area, causing the piston walls to rust making it imperative that the motor be changed instead of the possibility of simply replacing the heads.

    I went further and remove the front head and sure enough the number 2 piston was steam cleaned because of leakage to the head gasket that was damaged as well.

    The thing that I still could not verify was whether the water pump had indeed failed. Therefore, I purchased a brand new Goodwrench motor and had it installed. This did not include accessories, therefore the old water pump, which was replaced by the dealer in October, was transferred to the new short block. A new thermostat was also installed to verify that this was not interfering with water flow.

    The vehicle started, however, there was no water flow!! I attempted to perform a simple bleed of the system with the port beyond the thermostat to no avail because no water was being sent beyond the radiator, through the water pump, to the rest of the motor.

    My question on this is can a Water Pump cause the heads to be damaged and how quickly can this happen? I feel like if the heads were getting water and then all of a sudden the supply ended, this would cause a vapor lock and who knows what other damage. Has anyone heard of this being a possibility?
  • jeberjeber Member Posts: 91
    I'm no ASE cert mechanic or anything, but it seems that common sense says running an engine with no coolant flowing could damage all sorts of things fairly quickly, including head, head gasket...

    first thing that occurs to me re. this fiasco is: any possibility there's another gm dealer you could work with? even if inconvenient & farther away, it might be worthwhile to find a dealer service dept. that is more competent and customer service oriented

    I personally would change dealers, then write a letter detailing the experience, send it to a few high-level gm corporate offices, cc it to the "bad" dealer. couldn't hurt to try!
  • cobrastkcobrastk Member Posts: 3
    I agree with you.

    I just spoke with a GM customver service rep and he is going to refer this situation. I submitted essentially the same letter that I posted with the exception of dealer names and confidential stuff.

    One thing I did not mention is the Limp Home Mode because I was unaware of this. I am also trying to deal with the BAVR. My intention is to take the van into the dealer where I bought the motor from and have them verify that the water pump is faulty. From that point, I will have verification from a "Certified GM Service Department" which should give me the ammunition to take it to GM Corporate and get some action on this.
    I personally am getting to the point that this is the 3rd time, which also falls into Lemon Law since I purchased the vehicle from a GM Dealer in the first place. Don't know how all that works with a used vehicle but from what I understand it is no different than new.

    Also, is there a way to find some Email addresses of the GM Corporate offices? The customer service departments are giving me the run around so it is hard to get anything resolved that way. I need to get with a big wig somewhere somehow.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Think you have three things working against you with GM. 1) Vehicle is out of warranty (1997) 2) You are not the original owner 3)You have a warranty company to cover the repair costs. Best bet is to work on the warranty company. California lemon laws should be found on the web, so a search to find info to see if that is a route to go.
  • jeberjeber Member Posts: 91
    I did a quick google search...surprisingly hard to find contact info (?), but here's one:

    General Motors Corporation
    300 Renaissance Center
    PO Box 300
    Detroit, Michigan 48265-3000

    Maybe try qwestdex.com for detroit? good luck
  • infinia1infinia1 Member Posts: 174
    i've had my 02 with 15,500 miles for about a month now. there's just a few concerns i want to ask about. i noticed the driver side wiper overlaps the windshield and hits the black molding. it wipes fine it just seems that it goes over too far. is this normal? lately i've noticed an annoying squeek that seems to be coming from the rear hatch area. anyone else have this? overall i'm happy with the purchase, i just fear/dread the gasket issue. i'm looking into an extended warranty since i plan to keep this van for at least 7 years. and i agree with other posts that the air filter is a major pain! i tried for over 30 minutes and couldn't get the old, filthy one out! i made the selling dealer replace it since it was gm certified. other problems encountered on this gm certified were air coming inside thru the bottom of the windshield-they replaced it, dirty cabin air filters full of sand-they replaced, change oil light on 100 miles later-they changed. all of this was checked off as done on the certified checklist. i even asked about the filters before and was reassured twice that they were new! believe me, i raised hell and supposedly forced the overhaul of the gm certified program at that particular dealer. they did say i could return the van but i got it at such an amazing price ($17,300) that i didn't want to. oh well at least they made it right and filled my tank twice. my point in buying a gm certified was to avoid these type of things that were all wrong on my van. i'm waiting for a survey of my buying experience from gm so i can rip that dealer.
  • scout18scout18 Member Posts: 3
    My 2000 Venture has a rear wheel/tire shimmy at 48 and up that noboby seems to be able to fix.I have had the tires balanced numerous times,the tires checked,the wheels checked and am at my wits end to what this is.Does anyone have anything I might look at to have this problem fixed?
  • greg32greg32 Member Posts: 48
    If you have the resealable tires just give up and buy some new tires. The goop that seals after a puncture congeals and makes lumps inside the tire and very difficult to balance. I replaced mine with Michelon radials and its smooth up to as fast as we want to go.
  • scout18scout18 Member Posts: 3
    Thanks for the advice on the self sealing tires,thats exactly the tires I have.The dealer didn't think that would happen,but I always thought in the back of my mind this may be the problem,especially after all the times I have had the tires balanced and the wheels checked.New tires are now on the list...thanks again.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    You could test drive another one or two with the same set-up and see if they make noise....

    Steve, Host
  • baveuxbaveux Member Posts: 175
    Try to find a place equipped to balance ON the car, this is a much better way.

    Look also for a bad shock absorber.
  • kinjalkinjal Member Posts: 7
    If you click on my id and read the history, you will notive that I was hear in 1999/2000 asking questions for the research. In spite of what I found out, I bought Venture instead of Honda because Honda had 5 months wait and for Venture our total incentive was more than 7000.

    Had to take it to Dealer within first 100 miles for lose hoses.

    On our first trip to the city (less than 1000 miles on odometer), car went dead in the middle of the expressway!! Main computer was short-circuited. Dealer replaced it . But it happened again within 5 miles. It seems some of the wires were scratched by the A/C unit.

    AT about 5,000 miles, they replaced rear seats as they stopped folding.

    Front-passenger side door got stuck at less than 10,000 miles.

    In first 3 years we have gone through 2 bad batteries. (manufacturing defects)

    GM not had a recall on sliding door but we had a recell of recall!!! (and by the way our door worked perfectly till the second recall messed it up!!)

    The worst was when at 22,000 miles the transmission gave away.

    In owning about a dozen cars in my life, my score has been:
    Performance of Honda/Toyota A++
    Performance of any Big 3: F

    Since the problems on our venture are not recurring, t cannot be classified as Lemon.

    My advice to all thinking of buying Venture, not only stay away from Venture but stay away from any US manufacturer. (Note that there is nothing wrong with US made cars- Honda and Toyota are made in US)

    VENTURE (of for that matter any Big 3 vehicle) stinks.
  • jeberjeber Member Posts: 91
    don't like to hear stories like kinjal's above, but I guess those experiences need to be heard, the good with the bad etc.

    I, too, did a lot of research into various minivans before getting 01 silo...I also concluded that Honda is probably the best overall. But, when weighing the MUCH higher price I would've had to pay for a comparable honda, I decided that it was, for my budget anyway, a better "gamble" to get a gm and save a bundle up front. So far, its all good...we've put almost 15000 miles on it (its at 40000ish now) with nary a hitch, no problems, no malfunctions...knock on wood. The body/trim construction of my gm does seem to be rather like the plastic models I built as a kid, but the engine/chassis/transmission, and interior (for the most part) seem pretty sturdy.

    Also, from my previous research its clear that while hondas are wonderful, they are certainly not all perfect and problem-free
  • tomekktomekk Member Posts: 310
    Not mine ... bought new 2000 model in Nov 1999 now 36K miles (my wife drives it) and yes, it had right rear shock replaced twice for leaks, and got new alternator under warranty - but that's it (I hope!). OTOH, my friends with a Honda Ody had nothing but problems, starting with alignement that never could be fixed, 14MPG (dealer diagnose: normal) and 3 dead batteries in 2 years.
    Go figure.
    My personal experience:
     - the most trouble-free car I've ever had: Plymouth Acclaim, bought 1 yr old used for 8.5K, put $35 in for speed sensor and $60 for a muffler in over 60K miles, sold for $5K after 3.5 years
     - the cars I had by far the most troubles with: Nissan Stanza (engine computer, breakes) and Mazda Millenia S (coolant leak - 4 times in the shop, other things)
    You never know which car was built on Monday...
    Good luck
    Tomek
  • catamcatam Member Posts: 331
    Just look at this or any of the other category message boards. You will find a discussion for ie. "Honda Odyssey Problems, Perpetual Ford Explorer woes, etc." When I was researching my minivan purchase, I concluded the previous generation Toyota Sienna was probably the most reliable as a whole. However, it did not meet my needs in size, space, 8 pass seating, towing, or price. The one theme I did notice among minivans is that as a group they suffer an inordinate amount of tranny failures. Honda being among those with a history of tranny probs.
    However, I did notice that reports of early tranny failures amoing the GM triplets seemed to me to be less common. (I did a lot!!!! of research). In the end I have my own belief as to why this is the case. My opinion is that minivans use front drive platforms designed for cars, and when placed in heavier minivans, these systems are slightly overtaxed and the less hardy built ones fail early. Because the GM triplets are the lightest minivans, by 500-1000 pounds, (excluding the Mazda MPV, see 9/10ths scale minvan), the daily wear on the trannies is decreased.
    At any rate, the problems I found common to the GM triplets ie( failure of intake manifold gasket, power sliding door probs, and leaking rear windows) I judged as less severe and less expensive to fix needed than replacing the tranny.
    At any rate I am so far vey pleased with my 01 Venture. I bought it used with 18K miles, I now have 46K miles, with only a couple of minor probs fixed under original warranty.
  • agt_cooperagt_cooper Member Posts: 202
    that have been installed in my Montana in 38 thousand miles must have been of the "less hardy" variety.

    I wish I'd bought the Honda!!!
  • agt_cooperagt_cooper Member Posts: 202
    While it may be true that the Honda experienced mechanical problems, at least if I got sick of the problems, I could still sell the vehicle for a pretty good price. The same cannot be said for the GM triplets. Getting out from under a Honda problem child is much cheaper than doing the same with a GM product.
  • creidcreid Member Posts: 54
    You hit the nail on the head, I don't have a triplet but a safari and the resell value is absolutely horrible, vehicle is worth 50% of it's invoice price (gms in 2002) and it's only (2) years old w/ 19K miles. Didn't have that problem when I owned a Previa.
  • catamcatam Member Posts: 331
    You are right, as a whole Honda and Toyota maintain resale value at a much better rate than anything from the big 3. From that standpoint, if you are buying new and don't plan on keeping the vehicle long, the best value would be from one of the imports.
    The flipside of this issue is buying used. If you are buying used you can pick up a vehicle from any of the big 3 that is 1-3 years newer with 15-40K less miles for the same price as its counterpart from Honda or Toyota.
    For me I am very happy that I bought a one year old Venture with 18K miles for the price that a 4 year old Ody with 65K miles was selling for. I have a great, reliable vehicle that gets great mileage, and someone else paid for the bulk of the depreciation.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Hello Venture owners. I'm brand new to the VENTURE boards.

    We just traded in our 2000 IMPALA LS, paid the difference and bought a 2000 VENTURE LS. We chose it after having rented a VENTURE and a WINDSTAR on previous trips. Only complaint is that those windows in the rear are really dark - but they're even darker in the Dodge and Chrysler minivans.

    The VENTURE has about 28,000 miles on it and I'm wondering what kind of mileage you folks are getting out of your original FIRESTONE tires?

    Also, what product have any of you found that really restores the black color to the exterior black plastic handles and trim?
  • william21william21 Member Posts: 16
    Our original Firestone tires(99 Venture) lasted until 59,000(of course we balanced every 5,000 and had regular alignments). Replaced the tires with Bridgestone Turanzas(smooth riding tire). If anyone recommends the frequently mentioned manifold gasket repair, get a second opinion. We had ours replaced along with the water pump at 59,000 under the GM Warranty; however, not sure we needed because the service manager recommended after we came in for an unrelated service. One service I would recommend is a transmission fluid change or flush before the manufacture recommendation. These vans tend to have transmission problems, but I feel some of these problems could have been avoided with regular fluid changes. One more tip: Have the brakes checked and if the pads need to be replaced insist on an upgraded pad. These vans are hard on brakes.

    Hope you have many happy miles.
  • drivinisfundrivinisfun Member Posts: 372
    Most dangerous Minivan per IIHS:

    http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/96026.htm

    What a piece of crap!.
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    Thanks for the tips and good wishes on the Venture. I did notice that its brakes are not as quick as the Impala LS we traded.

    Apparently CARAVANS also have trans troubles. A friend replaced his trans at about 36000 miles on his 95 Dodge.

    So far, we love the Venture. It rides smooth and quiet and has all the interior space we needed to haul the baby and bring in all the supplies needed to redo things in and around our house. And it's only one inch longer than the Impala.

    Any suggestions from other posters are most welcome.

    Anyone interested in his sales stats on vans might want to check this link:
    http://www.autosite.com/editoria/asmr/svvan.asp
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Safest Minivans are the GMs (Olds #1, Pont #2 (#1 last year)since you linked to the Pont) per the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), they call all 3 of them "Substantialy better then average".

    http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings/ictl/ictl_wagon.htm
  • duraflexduraflex Member Posts: 358
    I happened to look underneath the 2000 Venture today and noticed some rust here and there on a few parts. Is that normal?

    Also, the whole length of the exhaust pipe including the muffler appears to have a rusty coating on it. Is that normal?
  • jeberjeber Member Posts: 91
    This was a consideration for me when looking at mini vans last fall...my wife/3kids are the main users, and I read some of the studies etc. on side impact being terrible, etc. But then, I was shown the "real world" safety statistics...how likely is someone to actually get killed if in a crash in a given vehicle. This showed that fatalities were not high, or even above avg in the gm's...that says a lot more to me than the other types of crash tests--if I had found people were statistically more likely to be killed if in a crash in a gm van, I wouldn't have got my silo. But they aren't more likely to, the van is not even below average. Don't have time to find links etc. to that data, maybe later, but I did find the documentation 8 or 10 months back

    also, using seat belts religously ups your odds tremendously in any car...just my 2 cents
  • artgpoartgpo Member Posts: 483
    The IIHS rates the Silhouette #1 in the amount of bodily injury claims. This is the same organization that tested the 1997 (?) model and found it performed "poorly" in the offset frontal crash test. The claim rate is more of a real world indication however, there are lots of variables involved. I know it costs less to insure my 2003 Silhouette than it does my 1999 Sable even though the Silhouette was $10,000 more than the Sable.
  • jay108jay108 Member Posts: 52
    My '99 Venture has been pretty good.

    Chevy replaced the shift solenoids on the tranny but that was about it.

    Oh Yeah, the anti-freeze sort of sludged over at 5 years and 42K causing the engine to run hot. A power flush took care of the problem.

    Mine gets 22mpg and better on the highway. I put new Michelins on it last fall before I started to boycott France.

    You buy a venture because you need a venture, not much with this machice.

    I'll keep it as long as it runs well, sometimes old reliable is better than a new potenial lemon.
  • carwoescarwoes Member Posts: 1
    How many of you Venture owners have had to replace your rear window wiper motor? What did they say was the problem with it? I have <70K miles on mine and I had it make it about 1/3 the way up the window twice and then it quit working altogether.

    Oh, to Marky1; the computer in mine said that 5 out of the 6 injectors were bad. I suspect it was because the computer was bad and kept on sending this message. Of course, GM's official response was that it was the gas I was buying! I always buy my gas from the corner Mobil station and my neighbors who also buy there have NEVER had any problems. After agreeing to take care of the cost of a new fuel filter, the dealer agreed to pay for the 5th injector which, by this time, was out of warranty. He's a neighbor of mine so, I suspect that's the only reason why he was nice to me and agreed to pay for it.
  • offhamoffham Member Posts: 344
    We have had our Venture 2000 LT 8 seater for just over three years and at 60500 miles and effectively trouble free for the last 25000 miles. The usuage is very typical small around town and long haul for college and sports events.

    I do change the oil every 3000 miles and have always used a GM PF 47 oil filter. I put a transmission cooler on for $180 at 32000 and change the fluid at 30000 miles. Dex Cool every two, as this stuff is not as good as made out and can clog if left in for the 4/5 years.No visible leaks of any kind

    I continue to find this van as a great long haul vehicle and eats up the miles combine in being highly flexible in terms of space (seats flip or take out).

    In the overall context of things, this continues to be a great van and cannot be more pleased.
  • kkollwitzkkollwitz Member Posts: 274
    Our 99 hasn't had any repairs, does the job. This winter it leaked about a teaspoon of coolant a day from the manifold gasket, has stopped with return of warmer weather.

    A great car.
  • muchnikamuchnika Member Posts: 1
    I am on the verge of buying a 2000 Venture from a friend who is a lease agent. The car is 34 months old and has 29,000 miles. (Still 2 months left on the original warranty.)

    The Venture is an LS extended, power door, rear air, CD/Cass stereo, 8 seat cloth, roof luggage carrier, theft alarm, 6-way power drivers seat, etc.

    The car is in perfect condition and is selling for $14,700 (lower NY area).

    I called Chevy with the VIN number, and they told me that the 1 recall was already fixed (power door) and the only other repair was a wiper motor replacement.

    Any comments? Is the price reasonable?

    Alina
  • offhamoffham Member Posts: 344
    On paper sounds a good deal, but run it through the Edmunds pricing. I used a North NJ zip and the price being asked seems top of the range.

    Good luck
  • lsinclsinc Member Posts: 270
    Sorry Montanafan but I got different information on the overall safety of the GM triplets. Check this site out:

    http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ce/html/96026.htm

    Plus CR has it rated "Fair" reliability. CR also states IIHS offset crash test is "Poor". It did fair pretty well on the Front crash test and side crash test. CR states "Subpar reliability and poor offset-crash test results take these essentially well-designed models out of contention."

    I wouldn't put my kids in one. I even traded my Villager in because of poor IIHS offset ratings and poor side impact ratings. The way people drive today (faster is better, get out of my way, so what if I put you at risk) and all of the huge SUV's out there with the same human attitudes, then the "real world" statisitics must be based on the "dream world" statisitcs. This is the real world and more people are killed every day due to the careless driving of others. I would rather have a higher rated vehicle around my children then one that is subpar.
     
    We went with the '03 Mazda MPV which is 5 star rated and has an "Excellent" reliability record. Oh and they are more affordable with better resale.

    Causing trouble as usual! :)

    Lsinc
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Using our source www.highwaysafety.org . Based on the latest infomation (Sept '02 for model years 1999-2001) available from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI) , the Mazda MPV has an injury rating 15% higher then the minivan/station wagon average and 30% higher then the Pontiac Montana. The IIHS/HLDI has rated the Montana "substantially better then average" and the Mazda "average".

    I am happy you have a vehicle that you are happy and comfortable with. My point has always been that there is more to choosing a vehicle then two crash tests in a lab in the fall of 1996. And when the conflicting info comes from the same source, wouldn't the one with the most data points be more reliable? Hundreds of incidents vs 2. Which is more "real" and which is more "dream".

    And as far as "I wouldn't put my kids in one", my kids are 8 and 5, so I will not have to worry for another 9 years, and I am sure my Voyager will be long gone by then. Those, such as yourself, with 17+ years olds at home, again will have to use different decission proccesses.
  • artgpoartgpo Member Posts: 483
    I know that my 2003 Olds Silhouette costs only $100 a year more to insure than does my wife's 1999 Sable. The Silhouette is rated #1 by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and the Highway Loss Data Institute (HLDI).

    I do not care what you are driving, if you get hit the wrong way or by a larger vehicle you are going to suffer. Look at all the safeguards NASCAR mandates and look at how badly injured Jerry Nadeau was last Friday.

    Turning on the ignition is a dangerous proposition no matter what you drive.
  • montanafanmontanafan Member Posts: 945
    Congradulations, JD Power just named the Olds the high scorer in Initial Quality for the compact van segment.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.