By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Wanting to get some reflective concepts rear kits and badge overlays, but am having trouble picking a color.
My baby's red, and I like the way the red looks, but in some photos on some peoples' websites, the red lettering doesn't look like it matches the red on the car.
I also like white, but am nervous that white on red will be garish or too much.
Any opinions/thoughts/experiences--especially from red GP owners on what looks best?
THANKS
I think that the warranty is only voided if the modification can be demonstrated to have a harmful effect on the part that breaks. In the case of a GTP, the transmission is already "max rated" by GM at 280 ft/lbs of torque. So if you add a smaller pulley to the supercharger and up the torque of the car, and your tranny later breaks, the dealer can (with good confidence) argue that you ignored GM's posted maximum tolerances for the part in question and refuse to cover the incident with warranty work. It's the devil's game with L67 engine owners (the same engine, BTW, that is in the supercharged Bonnie) that we all know the engines can safely produce MUCH more than 240 HP (like, try over 300 without too much expense), but that our transmissions can't take that kind of pressure.
The short answer: It only voids the warranty ON THE PART AFFECTED by the mod, and the dealer has to show that it has a good potential to be the culprit. And I mean good potential. They can't just point at a part, say "that's not stock," and void your warranty (though they might try to tell you so).
Kazz
How are you liking your Sunfire? My last car was a Sunfire GT. It was a lot of fun, but I was a little too tall for it...(6'2", and a little squished on long runs).
replaced (some nice lady rear-ended me at the traffic light), I am renting a '00 Grand Prix SE.
What a piece of junk! The dashboard rattles
on even smooth surfaces, switchgear & materials feel extremely cheap, and the overall fit-and-finish is vastly inferior to that of Japanese cars. The seating position is awful, the seats are pathetic. I realize it is not a GT or GTP and its 3.1 Liter is not as strong, but they all share the same backward platform.
I haven't owned an American-made car in 10 years,
and after driving this thing, I probably never will.
Sorry Pontiac, you are worthless!
The reason why all this is going through my mind is because the Maxima is about the only real competitor for the GP. Both are sports sedans and both in roughly the same price range, GP is cheaper by a bit. Incidentally, I noticed that a Max SE vs. GTP topic has recently started. But actually the underlying reason for my musings is that my mom may be looking into a new car because the old one is giving problems (broke a timing belt over the weekend, no damage though). Have an Eagle Vision TSi; very nice car, but as I'm sure you know, the first gen. LH cars have their share of problems. GP and Max seem pretty close to the Vision, so they would be stuff I'd recommend her to take a look at.
BTW, Sunfire GT is a great first car. I'm glad I didn't go for the Civic. The car is a lot of fun, but I agree it's not the largest. It fits me just fine, but I'm almost 6" shorter than you and my head is pretty close to the roof. Still, I like it a lot.
Pontiacs (i.e. Chevys and other GM crap) hold no automotive value in my eyes. I am amazed that people are still buying these things when much better cars are available in the same price range.
http://edmunds.com/edweb/wardlaw/98Family.Sedan.Comparo.rt.html
I think that the point of this is that the reputation of Japanese vehicles is no longer true. Although most of them may be put together very well, the testers finding one that had problems argues against the common belief that all of them are flawless and bulletproof. I think that the drop in quality is because now Honda is selling so many cars, they have to increase production output rapidly. When production is increased that fast, quality suffers. American cars are produced in far greater numbers than Japanese cars, so theoretically, they would suffer more from production line neglect.
About squeaks and rattles, another reason why Japanese cars may not have them is because of their mush suspension settings. The stiffer you set the suspension, the more of the bumps you and the car feel, and the more likely something will be shaken loose and make noise. A soft suspension may avoid this, but then you can't have any fun in the twisties.
One last thing. Experience with rental cars may not always be representative. Because it's not theirs, people who had the car before you may have hacked it a bit, and so it probably won't be the same as if it was driven nicely.
You started by badmouthing the car's interior (OK, Grand Prix is not as nice as a Lexus inside), and then you conclude that the whole platform is backward and these cars are worthless. And all that based on your personal experience with a rental car! You are quite an analyst.
sunfgt - for some reason I have never run into any race-minded Maxima drivers. I passsed quite a few on the highway, many of them were SE. Maybe they were trying to race, but I would never know. On the other hand some guy driving an Avalon was trying to give me a hard time. Just about any car today will go past 100mph. I usually race up to a reasonable speed and then stop (no need to expensive tickets here). A lot of people who get beaten in acceleration eventually catch up and need to prove that they are faster.
"abused" as many rentals are. Second of all,
my Accord Coupe's suspension is much stiffer than that in the Pontiac, so here goes that argument.
Grand Prix is a generic Detroiter with a very low fun-to-drive quotient. The car lacks the road feel, and the steering is not precise.
I would like to say that GP makes a very smooth cruiser with low noise.
My verdict: a competent family sedan with descent performance and good automatic transmission.
In the same league as Camry, Maxima, and Accord?
Not even close.
This is one of the reasons why I would never own an American car: no fun-to-drive manual-transmission cars available in my price range ($20-$30k).
My favorite setup is a smooth and high-revving 4-cylinder with a precise short-throw 5-speed. It
combines great fuel economy with unmatched control over the engine's torque curve. A true enthusiast would agree with me here. I am not a drag racer, and I don't care how big my engine is.
Let that little old lady in a Buick Le Sabre
utilize the ease of 2 big pedals and a no-brainer slush box and let me shift for myself.
My favorite "fun" cars available today:
Honda Accord (2.3-5 speed)
Acura Integra GS-R
BMW (3 or 5-series - 5/6 speed)
Nissan Maxima SE (5-speed)
fun-to-drive quotient. The car lacks the road feel,and the steering is not precise.]
Bohlen, before you open your mouth be sure what you say is fact. First of all you are comparing a rental SE. For starters, the SE doesn't share the same ENGINE, TRANSMISSION, SUSPENSION AND STEERING as the GTP. So before knocking the car, know exactly what you are talking about.
Drive a GTP, then you will see your fun to drive quotient will turn around. Ask any GTP owner - and they probably say their #1 reason for buying one is because of it's fun to drive. And they don't want some crappy little VTEC engine screaming at 6,000 RPM to give them the power they want.
Also, people get the GTP because of it's features and style. Please don't make me laugh - the accord and camry are as plain vanilla as you can get. Integra?? I don't think any GTP owner would even consider one.
The Maxima I respect. Great engine, 5 speed. OK style. I came close to buying one, but in the end the style, engine, and features (i.e. HUD) of the GTP won me over. I have 7500 squeak, rattle and problem free miles thus far.
BMW's are nice also - but you are now talking lots more $$$'s. It's a different demographic - so it's silly to compare. I dont think a BMW owner would consider a Honda.
available. VTEC (valve timing and electronic lift
control) allows for the best horsepower-to- displacement ratio in a normally aspirated engine.
For example, Honda S2000 has a 2.0L engine with
240 horsepower which translates into 120 horsepower per liter. Integra GS-R
with a 1.8 Liter and 170HP produces a whopping 94HP per liter...enough said.
Grand Prix GT's normally aspirated 3.8 Liter has 200HP rating which roughly translates into 53HP per liter, and even a supercharged version with 240HP is only 63HP per liter...pathetic.
The 3.8 Liter engine is an old-timer. It first appeared two decades ago and underwent many
changes since then, but in essence it is still an
old iron block 2 valve per cylinder configuration.
That's what I would call "crappy".
I just can't stand snobs.
I'm not going to start a flame war about whats better than what. The fact is the 3800 I have in my GTP gives me a stock HP for 240hp, 280lb foot of torque which is available instantly at any RPM.
You fail to mention the RPM's the Integra GS-R or any VTEC engine needs to attain to get all that horsepower. Read this link to find out:
http://members.tripod.com/~juan_espero/lowpro.html
In either case it's stupid to compare an Integra GS-R with a GTP. I don't think potential buyers would lump the two together. One is small performance import and the other is a larger performance sedan with room for 5.
That doesn't change any of the facts, that what you said about the GRand Prix was based on an experience with the SE which is worlds different than a GTP. Even GTP owners knock it.
Can you accept that you were wrong making those assumptions? I you can accept that...then you will be credible. I will try to remain credible by taking back what I said about the VTEC being crap. But it isn't the be-all-end-all of engines.
What's the deal with "Toys R US" big buttons on the radio and window controls.
Regarding the link you posted...they are comparing
TURBO engines with NORMALLY ASPIRATED engines! That is nonsense.
And what's so special about those cars? snooze, ugly, dull. (respectively)
"What's the deal with "Toys R US" big buttons on
the radio and window controls."
Geebus christ, that's pretty petty. My older Maxima's button aren't any smaller.
I suppose you could just pull the knob off the radio, and just turn the metal shaft, would that be better? Maybe GM should just replace it with a screw head, then it wouldn't take up any space.
"they are comparing TURBO engines with NORMALLY ASPIRATED"
You didn't seem to mind comparing specific use performance motors (S2000, ITR) to what is basically a general purpose motor.
Ofcourse HP/L is a completely worthless measure.
As for your beloved HP/L ratio - so what? What is the real world benefit of it? Pigeon free roads because all the pigeons got scared of the screaming engine and flew away?
Is a 240 HP 2.0L engine more powerful than a 240 HP 3.8L engine?
"Honda Lover's Delusion: Honda & Acura engines are more powerful than American V8s"
They made one reference to a domestic small displacement engine with a turbo. The entire articles point though was torque and horsepower count. How many hp/litre doesn't.
Now you are grasping straws making fun of the buttons. What next? You don't like the way it smells?
I could take ANY car under 25k regardless of make and come up with a list of things they did to cut corners. With my GTP, and yes, with any Honda or Toyota.
In the same price range? A 3.1 SE is the same price as a 4 cyl Accord/Camry. I'll take a six over a four any day!
"The 3.8 Liter engine is an old-timer. It first
appeared two decades ago and underwent many
changes since then, but in essence it is still an
old iron block 2 valve per cylinder configuration. That's what I would call "crappy".
The 3.8L is one of the most reliable, fuel efficient engines on the market. It's may use "older" technology, but it's an VERY good engine.
Please compare apples to apples before you go on a rant. The GP you drove was a car produced for rental companies. They are base models. The base accord/Camry are nothing to write home about either.
A better comparison to your Accord would be an Intrigue. I'm sure you will like that!
I would sure like to know. It seems that I see a lot of them on the road wherever I go.
I can see why they sell so well- I sure love mine (see post #255).
By the way, I'm up to 15K miles with absolutely no problems. The car has still had only routine maintenance and no repairs/adjustments.
tsjay
I have ever seen. What motivated you to buy this
piece of s..t?
Answer = 10 years of Hond/Acura products as follows:
1989 Accord LX (5-Speed)
1990 Accord DX
1994 Accord LX
1995 Integra LS Sedan (5-Speed)
1996 Accord LX
1997 Acura 2.5TL
Good time for a change, don't you think?
productive, and is focusing the discussion away
from the Grand Prix (which is the name of this
forum) to Honda/Acura vs. Domestics.
I don't think anyone has to justify why they
purchased their car to him. I think the Accord is
ugly...he thinks the Impala is ugly. WHO
CARES!!!!!???? They aren't GRand Prix related.
So just to remind you what this forum is about...
greywolf - that has to be Zaino shine.
Ha... gas guzzling... my GTP did 27mpg when I drove it from NYC to Florida, with wife in the passenger seat, A/C on, and bags, boxes, and suitcases full of stuff in the rear seats and in the trunk. Bohlen, try to transport that on your trike.
HUD allows me to see a lot of the important info without having to look down at the instrument panel or the stereo. It sure would be nice if it also showed outside temp and the settings on the dual zone automatic climate control. Bohlen you should go find a military pilot and tell him that the HUD in his F-15 is a cheap useless toy.
Overstyled... I think you are talking about some other car, really. Maybe a Tiburon?
People interested in gathering information regarding the Pontiac GP come here only to find rants and unfounded claims written by someone who hates domestic automobiles and also by someone who doesn't even own the car being discussed here.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion, but it makes me wonder if you get some sort of weird pleasure by upsetting others about their vehicle choice.
You are doing no service to potential or current GP owners with your comments.
If youlove your Honda so much, go and help your fellow Honda Accord owners which are currently experiencing failed automatic transmissions, fuel boil overs, interior rattles, paint finish problems among other issues that plague the current Accord generation.
Since you area true Honda believer, I don't think
you belong here.
Honda/Acura: Been there done that! I am not so much dissatisfied as I am more dissapointed in how they completely have made a turn for the worse in quality and design. Killing the Legend, Vigor and letting go on the Integra re-designed for more than 6 model years have been factors that finally drove me away from these overhyped and overpriced products. the Accord is boring and the same 1980's concept generation model after generation model.
And also my friend, I really got tired of driving underpowered VTEC four bangers and Jerky Automatic transmissions. the 3800 Series II V-6 in N/A and Supercharged versions has been awarded the Ward's automotive 10 best V-6 engines in the world, list that no Honda or Toyota V-6 has ever made into, only Nissan.
I enjoy blasting Toy Accords and watching them dissapear from my rear view mirror.....
The Impala at least has some personality unlike the generic plain vanilla looking Accord.
MADE FOR THE ME TOO MASSES!
I had a '99 Mitsu Diamante (top-of-the-line), and
(for ruski), loaded with toys, which was a terrible product. I am a car enthusiast, and
I am not trying to get on your nerves here...I am simply curious what drives people to buy Pontiacs
and Chevys, that's all. Why not be civilized and debate politely?
I value technology, and personally I see no technological innovation on part of GM. HUD?
Give me a break. My Grand Prix SE averages 15 miles per gallon in a city...who need HUD? You need a spare gas tank!
I know that Pontiac buyers are not known for good taste :-).I personally prefer the understated design of my EX Coupe.