Older Honda Accords

1117118120122123389

Comments

  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    i would say most people who visit this page don't think of the taurus as being in the same league as the accord or camry.
  • civicwcivicw Member Posts: 135
    I'm a Civic owner, but that was my first reaction after I saw the 03 Accord.

    Random thoughts/questions:

    - front end is stylish, rear end more than compensates and looks old already. 2-3 years from now, it's going to look REALLY old. In contrast, a '94 model still looks current.
    - USA Today says that only 25% of Accord buyers are families, and most of the others are empty nesters (usually >45 years old). If that's true, why is the Accord growing bigger every generation? Are drivers getting bigger? Doesn't car size detract from the handling?
    - 03 has lost the commanding view from the driver's seat. The dashboard is higher. Bad move, Honda.
    - Seems like Honda is trying to redirect the younger crowd to the upcoming Acura TSX, and the older crowd to the 03 Accord. I predict that the TSX will easily sell 100,000 copies, if they keep the price in the 24-25K range.

    On a somewhat related note, I've never understood the preoccupation with 0-60 times. Does anybody drag race their Accords?
  • amazing2uamazing2u Member Posts: 67
    I've read ALL of the reviews for the 03 Accord (online and I'm subscribed to ALL of the car mags) and the only conclusion that I can think of is that the pre-production unit tested by MotorWeek was probably tired (read: beaten to death :-) ).
    That's why I still think that MotorWeek is honest and they told it as it was...

    NOT like C&D that have some MAJOR problems in their current October edition. The numbers in the comparo you used are WAYYYY off... A TL-S with a 0-60 in 7.6sec? and the 1/4 mile at 16 flat?!

    In the same edition, they talk about the 6spd Maxima (which got a 0-60 in 6 flat) and say that it was as fast as the Acura TL-S that ran a 0-60 in 6.2 and the 1/4 mile in 14.8. Trust worthy? I think not.

    In short, do NOT compare the Accord with those numbers. :)
  • sutton4sutton4 Member Posts: 34
    Honda has finally acknowledged there is a problem with all the transmisison failures, but they refuse to recall them.

    From the LA Times,

    "Mike Spencer, a spokesman for Acura, Honda's sport-luxury division, confirmed that there has been a "higher than normal incidence" of problems with two Honda-built automatic transmissions. "

    "The two transmissions are the five-speed used in V-6-equipped Acuras since the 2000 model year and in Honda Odysseys since the 2002 model year; and the four-speed automatic used in V-6 Honda Accords since 2000 and in 2000 and 2001 Odysseys. "

    http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20020914/1036070.asp
  • anonymouspostsanonymousposts Member Posts: 3,802
    We drove a 2003 EX-L automatic and were very impressed. Kinda made me regret buying my 02 Civic SI but I wouldn't buy a car in it's first few months of production anyways. The interior was VERY nice and it had a great driving position. The automatic transmission was way smoother than the one in my 01 V6 Accord coupe and the dual-zone climate control was a nice touch. The salesman said that they had gotten above MSRP for a few Accords but that he would sell me a 2002 Accord cheap. Since I've already had a 99 EX sedan and a 01 V6 EX coupe I said "been there, done that, got the payment book to show for it".

    Since I just bought my SI I will probably hang on to it for a couple of years and get a EX 5-speed sedan or a V6 6-speed coupe or maybe I'll be able to talk my fiance into getting rid of his car for the Accord instead of the G35 coupe he wants. Who knows.

    regfootball: I wouldn't compare the Diamante to an Accord if I were you. The Diamante has not been redesigned since 97 so it's on an even older platform than the 98-02 Accords. The Diamante has a 3.5L engine but can only muster 200HP or so in ES/LS trim and only 215HP in VRX trim. The Accord gets 240HP out of a 3.0L V6. Also, I'm sure if you compared features the Accord offers more luxury features than the Diamante even though the Diamante is priced to compete with the Acura TL and Lexus ES/IS300. Diamante's also depreciate like a rock and have poor reliability and are nowhere near the quality/performance of other cars in it's $29,000 price range. But Mitsu does throw them away with generous incentives and the no payment/no interest for a year program. But like I said considering how fast they depreciate I wouldn't extend the finance term any longer than I had to.
  • snowdonsnowdon Member Posts: 38
    So what are people paying for these cars?

    Michael
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    As the owner of a 2000 EX V-6 who just had about 45 minutes behind the wheel of a 2003 EX V-6, let me assure you that a driver of the latter vehicle will NOT have to worry about being embarrassed at a stoplight by a driver of the previous generation Accord. The additional power in the 2003 is VERY apparent... quite a major kick in the derriere, even by comparison to the previous V-6.

    I don't know what problem Motorweek was having, but if I were them, I'd get a different V-6 sample and try again. There's no way in God's green earth that their results are even close to being representative. I trust that they're being honest, but something was clearly seriously amiss there.
  • filodfilod Member Posts: 189
    very disturbing, thank you sutton4... hope by the time I decide to buy an accord (v6 is what I want to get) this problem is solve...I will wait for awhile

    as to price, my personal view is 1.5% to 3% over invoice is reasonable after considering some holdouts that the dealers get (although for 03 they are getting much less than the previous models sold last august when it was reported that the hold outs run as much as $1,500 for some models). They will also make money from the accessories that most of us will get (I like the rear decklid spoiler) one has to probably wait for awhile, dealers always have the upper hand for a newly introduced model, specially hondas.. I will be patient when it comes to price

    hope to hear more from those that have bought their 03 accords already..
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    i see you asked this type of question on the taurus board. i would suggest you test drive all three cars. i think you'll most likely come to the conclusion that the taurus is not at the same level as the other two. depending on what you look for in a car, this may not be such a big deal and you wouldn't want to pay the extra dough. it's not $7k as some taurus owners would like you to believe. when you compare prices for comparably equipped cars you'll see that for yourself. the 4 cylinder accords/camrys can more than keep up with the base v6 from the taurus. so i consider those cars comparable as far as engine performance. you get what you pay for.

    if you read the enthusiast's magazines (such as car and driver) or consumer based magazines (such as consumer reports) as part of your research, you'll find out that the taurus isn't rated nearly as well as the camry/accord. you may already know this though.

    i don't think there is much cross shopping between the taurus and accord.

    i don't currently owned an accord. but before my jetta, i had owned/leased 4 accords and would highly recommend them.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    lets keep this in perspective. even with their transmission problems, the accord/acura tl are still way above average in problems encountered per car. no one builds a perfect car.
  • filodfilod Member Posts: 189
    if i decide to shell out $25k, it is still a concern to me, 1.6% is experiencing the problem...

    but again, I still want the v6, just have to wait till the kinks are solved for the first production runs...

    honda said they are confident the problems have been solved.. so its one's personal decision to buy now or later
  • emaleemale Member Posts: 1,380
    if the tranny problems are indeed fixed...why doesn't honda give their customers a powertrain warranty that is at least comparable to toyota? now that toyota...nissan...chrysler...subaru, etc have long powertrain warranties...how come honda doesn't?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    "why is the Accord growing bigger every generation?"
    Actually, if you haven't noticed, the new Accord has fractionally smaller rear seat and trunk compared to the outgoing model. Perhaps in an effort to tweak that rear suspension for sportier performance.
    Front legroom has grown by 0.5", but rear legroom is down 1.1".
  • carforyoucarforyou Member Posts: 1
    Hi,

    Looking for Honda Accord '03 - Sedan in St.louis or Kansas city area. Can anyone suggest me a dealer giving good deal!!.

    Thanks in advance.
  • vmaturovmaturo Member Posts: 71
    Why doesn't Honda give a warranty comparable to other brands?

    They don't have to. People are very happy to buy extended plans.

    Besides it helps keep cost down. Just like those timing belts.
  • jmurman42jmurman42 Member Posts: 675
    Dealerships the the Mid-Atlantic region are selling the EX V6 for MSRP

    Jerry
  • glideslopesglideslopes Member Posts: 431
    ��An earlier ��������post nailed it in my opinion. Honda has made the decision to market the Accord to the 45 and over population. The new Acura will assume the position of appealing to younger buyers looking for more "gusto." Honda will still sell just as many however due to the aging population in this country. Quite honestly it is a very astute move on Honda's part IMO

    Regards,
    Mark.
  • moonkatmoonkat Member Posts: 265
    MW does not say where their test models are from and they are likely Honda pre-production or early-production testers. I do not think Honda would have had any difficulty installing de-tuned chips in them to yield any numbers they desired.

    Still I don't like to put all my eggs in one basket. While MW has been forthcoming in past, there is still no explanation for video-taping the LX 4cyl for the acceleration run, and then subsequently stating that these numbers were for the V6 (the text on screen does not associate the numbers with either engine).

    If not MW or AW, then what are good numbers for 03 ivtec & V6 Accord?
  • bcabbcab Member Posts: 20
    My last two mid-sized sedans have been Mazdas: '97 Milenia and '99 626, both v6.

    I love the new '03 Accord, but my budget matches the i4 cyl. (auto. trans.). Living on Long Island, climbing hills is not an issue, but highway-speed entrance and passing are big!

    My question is "Can a v6 guy find happiness with an i4?"
  • sutton4sutton4 Member Posts: 34
    I reread the article and noticed that Honda is replacing the defective transmissions with REBUILT transmissions.


    Who wants to buy a new car, then get a rebuilt tranny put in it?


    http://www.buffalonews.com/editorial/20020914/1036070.asp

  • bcabbcab Member Posts: 20
    Does the defective tranny problem include the Inline 4 or is it the V6 only"
  • jar1945jar1945 Member Posts: 22
    The LA Times article implied that the problem has been fixed. Can any dealer on here vouch 100% that these rotten 5 speed automatic transmissions are not being put into 2003 Accords, 4 or 6 cylinder? If you do not know, call the ever helpful people at 1-800-999-1009. I just bought an EX-L and now I am nervous about driving it!
  • jar1945jar1945 Member Posts: 22
    This whole transmission issue is making Honda look really bad and wide open for a large class action law suit!
  • inkyinky Member Posts: 370
    I think the 4 banger is adequate for normal people. For those wanting a little smoother drive with 2-3 mpg real world penalty then the V-6 is the way to go. IN reality the V-6 is $2100 more for supplemental air bags, traction control and the V-6. Pricey but fair. The real world V-6 mileage will be well over 30 on the highway with the gearing. Insurance may vary with 4 vs 6 so check that out. I am beginning to like the red but have noble green on order. Anyone notice how much darker the windows look with a dark interior like gray or black?
    INKY
  • barbzbarbz Member Posts: 19
    Why doesn't Honda recall these transmissions? They admit in that news article that there is a problem.
  • emaleemale Member Posts: 1,380
    boy, after reading that tranny article, i'd be especially leary if i lived in the northern US where roads often times have ice/snow on them in the winter time. just think what would happen if your car slammed into 2nd gear while driving on that!!!! that could be very BAD!!! let's hope they really have this problem fixed...
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    don't be nervous, be happy.

    you should like your chances in comparison with most domestics. toyota had their engine sludge problems, but i would still like my chances having one of those too. no one makes a perfect car.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Mackabee, are you around?

    Could you email me at pat@edmunds.com? Thanks!
  • bowkebowke Member Posts: 169
    honda's target age for the accord sedan is 34-41, and the target age for the coupe is 24-30. the target range for the '02 sedan was over 45.

    moonkat...there is no visual difference between the lx 4-cyl and the lxv6, so dont assume that because it had wheel covers that it was a 4-cyl car. it frustrates me that i cant tell the difference between the lx and lxv6 from the outside anymore...lol.
  • civicwcivicw Member Posts: 135
    robertsmx - I'm going by the official Honda dimensions that say the 03 is slightly larger than the old one. In person, the 1 inch increase in width does makes the body look bigger, even though the interior room may be fractionally smaller in the rear, as you say.

    bowke - you say "honda's target age for the accord sedan is 34-41, and the target age for the coupe is 24-30. the target range for the '02 sedan was over 45."

    Looks to me like Honda set that target range AFTER designing the car, instead of before. Honda has just found out to their dismay that the redesigned Civic is getting cutomers about 4-5 years older than the previous Civic. I think they're concerned that it's going to be the same with the new Accord. But setting a lower target age now is not going to get droves of young people to buy this car.

    They're going to miss their 32-41 age target by about 12 years or more, IMHO. This Accord will be great competition for the Camry and Avalon, and that means mostly people over 50. They'll easily sell over 400,000 copies/year to them. As I said in my previous post, it's the Acura TSX which could sell over 100,000 copies/year, mostly to the younger age group, if it's priced reasonably.
  • talon95talon95 Member Posts: 1,110
    ... are all new mechanicals... only the outer housing is reused. That's a very expensive part and doesn't need to be replaced.

    Actually, the correct term is remanufactured, because no parts other than the housing are reused. And I believe the articles states that this is common practice when a transmission is replaced.
  • bkm119bkm119 Member Posts: 16
    At the request of INKY in Post #5939, I am reposting the details of my lease.

    Here are my details:
    Cap. Cost: $24,375 (Approx. $700 over invoice)
    Term - 42 months
    Mileage - 15k/yr
    Residual - 61% ($16018.60) (Unbelievable for 42 months at 15k!!!)
    Money Factor - .0022 (5.28%)
    Up front $ - $1405.90 ($550 Acquisition, $113 Tax Title and License, Cap. Cost Reduction $400, Other Taxes $40.50, First Payment $302; Security Deposit waived because of Honda lease loyalty)
    Monthly payment is $302.40, broken down as follows: Monthly Depreciation $189.44, Interest $87.99, Pennsylvania's 9% lease tax $24.97.)

    It is my understanding (second hand info, so verify this) that these are the residual and money factors through 10/31/02.

    I have posted extensive residual value info on the Honda Accord 2003 Redesign at #675

    If you are anywhere near Pennsylvania, contact Murray's Honda in DuBois, PA for a deal like mine. They will discount like this, for what ever reason. I understand that someone saw my deal on here and is coming in from Indianapolis, Indiana to get one. Their number is (814) 371-5502. Ask for Matt, and tell him you saw the information here, and that Brian sent you.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    were talking 03 accord v6 gas mileage. it's suppose to have improved despite adding 40 horses.

    civicw: you drive the lowly civic, so whose cares what you think? just kidding. i guess in time we will know how successful honda was in their target age group.
  • moonkatmoonkat Member Posts: 265
    You again....
    Did you even see the video?...I thought not.

    Of course MW could have shown interior/exterior/engines for a graphite/LX (wheel covers)/4cyl & red/EX (7-spoke)/V6 then switched to a graphite V6 with LX wheel covers (shown nowhere else in the segment)......but I don't think so.

    As a salesman, you should study your product segment better; view and comprehend, video, literature and posts. Honda Accord and particularly the V6 buyers are a picky lot!-)
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    ...the Hondaphobes have been waiting long and patiently for something to go wrong and I guess they're getting their wish. Now let's wait and see how many new topics are started just for this.
  • inkyinky Member Posts: 370
    Nice call sign by the way. I beg to differ on the V-6 mileage. I just sold a 3.2 TL. I averaged 25-26 and got 32-33 on the highway. The gearing is the main player. Factor in less weight and similiar gearing you will see highway mileage well over 30 in the V-6. City mileage will be far superior with the I-4. We will just have to wait for reports but the EPA estimates and my TL experience seem to show it.
    INKY
  • computernerdcomputernerd Member Posts: 10
    Just test drove the new Accord and I thought I'd share my impressions: First, the car looks much better in person than it does in pictures. I didn't like the way the car looked from the pictures but after seeing it in person I've changed my mind. To me it looks sporty and modern. The interior is gorgeous, especially in the EX model. The metallic trim in the darker color interiors is definitely better than the fake wood. I'm also suprised that nobody has mentioned the classy looking headliner! There's also excellent leg room in the back seat. I only got to drive a 4. Apparently dealers in my area (Southern Cal.) are selling the V6's as soon as they get them and there were none available to test drive. The dealer I went to was charging a $1,000.00 "dealer markup" on the V6s. Even with the 4 I thought the car drove beautifully. Great feel from the steering and brakes and a very smooth power train. With 5 people on board (my family and the salesman) it wasn't exactly snapping my head back though. If I was going to buy one I would definitely want the V6. I got to take it on the freeway. I took an S shaped onramp at high speed and I was impressed with the handling. It also had a great ride and was very quiet at freeway speed. If it sounds like I'm raving, you're right. Best mid-priced family sedan that I've ever driven and I've driven them all: the Passat, the new Altima, the Camry. If I was buying a sedan right now I'd take an Accord and I haven't even tried the 6 yet!!!
  • bowkebowke Member Posts: 169
    accord 4-cyl 5 speed manual: 26 city, 34 hwy

    4 cyl auto: 24 city, 33 hwy

    6 cyl auto: 21 city, 30 hwy

    6 cyl, 6-speed manual: TBA

    moonkat...i do know my product, and i see and read every review i can get my hands on. no, i didnt see this one, but my assumption would be that they either had an lxv6, or the lx footage was just better than the v6 footage.
  • bklynguybklynguy Member Posts: 275
    I'm interested in the EX V6 ( Redondo Red Pearl ), wing spoiler, fog lights, MP3 player, DVD i-VES.

    I looked at the accessories brochure for the 03 Accord sedan and XM radio is missing from the list, I read that it should be available starting on Oct. 1 according to the XM Radio website.

    Can the MP3 player, DVD i-VES & XM radio be ordered together ( I noticed that only 2 head units can be installed where the CD cubby is the default option ) ?

    Are ID3 tags supported on the MP3 player ( showing song title, artist, on the center LCD ) ?

    Does anyone have a i-VES system installed on their Odyssey or Pilot, how is the screen quality ?

    Any invoice info available yet for the Accord ?

    Thanks in advance from this potential Accord owner & current Camry owner !
  • bcabbcab Member Posts: 20
    Brian, your lease info is very helpful, but I'm not sure which car you're talking about:
    4 or 6 cyl.? EX with Leather?

    Please fill me in.
  • ecarmackecarmack Member Posts: 161
    Thanks for the info. That would be me coming in from Indy. I get somewhat close to that area on business, and with that deal, thought I would take a car home.
  • barbzbarbz Member Posts: 19
    What are the actual years and models that have the defective transmissions?

    Has Honda released that information yet?
  • articulatedarticulated Member Posts: 3
    I purchased a brand new EX just a month ago. I had problems keeping the trunk lid open. Turns out dealers 'bodyshop' failed to install the heavy duty springs required with the spoiler option. To my absolute horror, as I waxed it today for the very first time, I noticed some marks in the passenger door paint. Bondo sanding marks under the paint. I can't believe it, a brand new car with body work! If I can see it, so will a dealer when I trade it in. There goes K Blue book resale value. I don't know what I should do first, shoot the dealers sales staff or contact a lawyer.
    When I took delivery the fuel filler door presented a large paint chip and the dealer still hasn't furnished the replacement part which comes primed only and must be paint matched by dealer 'bodyshop'. The drivers location has a grab handle in the ceiling over the door which gives my head a nudge every time I get in/out. I asked the dealer to remove it and stick the appropriate beauty plugs into the screw holes. Can't be done says the dealer parts man, there are no plugs provided for this purpose. Could be quite hazardous in an accident! Fuel mileage for this 4 is avg. 24 mpg at this new 1700 mi. I find the drivers seating very cramped and entry/exit difficult to both the front & rear seating. It's my wife's car and she is comfortable at 5'5". This is my first Honda and for now I'm quite depressed with this purchase. And you guys tell me to expect transmission problems? I thought Hondas were better than Toys, or so I hear tell. Our other car is a Camry Wagon. No pizzas, just iron clad reliability, so far 82,000 mi. This Honda purchase set me back $22,168 incl. T/T/R/6%ST.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    try reporting your displeasure to Honda directly. they're not going to be too happy with this dealer either.
  • diploiddiploid Member Posts: 2,286
    I can understand the dissatisfaction with the paint and trunk problems, but I think the entry/exit complaint is really not Honda's problem. If the car is for your wife, but you also drive it, the both of you should've agreed/disagreed before purchasing the car.

    Did you try speaking with the dealership's manager first? There's usually a chain of command you should follow. Certainly don't want to report this dealership to Honda and then come back for oil changes in the future.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Sometimes cars are damaged at the factory and are repaired and repainted there. It happens all the time. If Honda feels like it is a good repair then the dealer has to accept it.
    My '01 Impala was repainted at the factory around the driver's door handle. My dealer called Chevy and they said they would repaint it again, but that was all.
    My dealer got an indentical car from Florida and had it waiting for me. I didn't take the new car because it had an earlier build date. We buffed out the repaint and it is not noticeable except by me.
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    I wonder if it is possible to find out what build date has the transmission modifications?
  • b4zb4z Member Posts: 3,372
    Fairly attractive from the front with a beefier look. There doesn't seem to be any defined top or line to the front fenders. All of the cars in this dealership had pinstripes to give some visual clue.
    I didn't sit in one but it looked like there was more front seat room. Back seat room appeared to be a little less.
    The interiors are very nice with good quality materials.
    Overall a nice package.
    Just wish they offered the EX without the sunroof.
    I am very tall and need the extra headroom.
  • tanveermtanveerm Member Posts: 42
    Canadian prices released for 2003 Accord...


      5MT 5AT

    DX $23,800 $24,800

    LX-G $25,000 $26,000

    EX-L $28,500 $29,500

    LX V6 NA $29,000

    EX V6 NA $32,500


    LX price is up $2,000 (8.3%), EX-L up $1,200 (4.2%) and EXV6 up $1,400 (4.5%). Damn, those are big jumps.


    Didn't notice any difference in the list of features from the American model. Sedan goes on sale Sept. 30th, coupe in November and 6-speed coupe in early 2003.


    Complete Press Release http://www.canadiandriver.com/news/020914-1.htm

  • inky4inky4 Member Posts: 238
    These do happen. never ever buy a new car sight unseen. Inspect carefully--never assume perfection. And pass on anything that you will not be happy with.
    INKY
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.