Older Honda Accords

1365366368370371389

Comments

  • 05ody05ody Member Posts: 103
    Hello everyone, today I tried to drive my car like standard without a clutch (1st to 2nd to 3rd to 4th), and it felt almost like a standard! now my car has 161 000Km's and I would rather drive it like this as it is much more fun! does anyone have experiance with this, and if you have can you tell me that if I do this on a regular basis, will I mess up my auto tranny? I know some 98 V6's have tranny issues (although with mine now at 161 000km's I doubt it does, but you never know) will this mess it up? Im not sure if this is where I post this question or not but I want to know if I will mess up my tranny doing this! Thanks for any input!
  • drummer13drummer13 Member Posts: 13
    Can anyone please tell me the best source to buy the fog light units and spash guards? The fog lights look great (and, are very functional). But, it's about $500 for the dealer to put the them in ! I checked the web....many listed. I'd hate to pick the wrong one. Hard to install the lights and guards?
  • tallman1tallman1 Member Posts: 1,874
    I don't have any experience with this place but others have shared the link. You can look up the part and see the installation instructions so that you know exactly what you are getting yourself into. Prices are reasonable, although I'm sure someone will always find a better price. Fun place to browse.

    HandA-Accessories
  • drummer13drummer13 Member Posts: 13
    This is a great site. Many thanks ! The spash guards are easy. But, the fog lights are a MAJOR piece of work looking at the installation instructions. No wonder dealers get about $200 - $250 to install them. And, maybe that's why you don't see any Accords with them. They really do dress-up the front of the car.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Took a trip to Gulf Shores, AL from my home near Birmingham, AL on Wednesday. My numbers were:

    258.5 miles / 6.61 gallons

    Overall, this means that with A/C running constantly, cruise control set on 76 MPH, only me and one bag in the trunk, I managed to achieve 39.1 MPG. I haven't refueled since my return trip, so with my driving around town today, my mileage will not reflect the strictly highway mileage that I measured on the way to the beach.

    Overall though, I was quite pleased that I drove to the beach for less than $20. (6.61 * $2.809 a gallon) for $18.57 of Chevron Regular.
  • robgraverobgrave Member Posts: 65
    Overall, this means that with A/C running constantly, cruise control set on 76 MPH, only me and one bag in the trunk, I managed to achieve 39.1 MPG.

    This is hard to believe, but I trust your word, so I guess I've got something to look forward to. The overall mileage on my new Accord is only 675. What's yours? (I'm assuming better mileage with a more experienced engine.)

    Robgrave
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I now have 10,400 miles. I got 36 MPG on my first big trip, with NO A/C use, but I only had 2,000 miles on the car. Even I'm surprised that I got 39 MPG while using the A/C.

    Be aware though, that the way I drove, the tach never surpassed 2,500 RPM for 99% of the trip (save for merging). The torque-converter stayed locked-up and in 5th gear, and I certainly never summoned a downshift. The joy of daytime traffic on a Wednesdaym I guess.

    Had I downshifted a few times (like I more commonly have to do) I imagine my numbers would be closer to 34-35 MPG, because that's my normal HWY average when I'm dealing with traffic.

    You'll love your car, no doubt. Some V6 owners are even getting 33+ MPG (forum poster "ezshift" comes to mind, with his 6-speed Accord). I am averaging about 27 MPG in mixed driving right now with heavy A/C use, but HWY mileage is typically above sticker for me, because I do my best to keep the car from having to downshift. It also keeps the trip interesting, more-so than just setting cruise on 80 and forgetting it. I use a little planning on hills (gather some speed before a long grade, up to say 80MPH, then I may drop to about 70MPH by the top of it in order to keep the revs down. The cruise control would have unlocked the torque converter and possibly downshifted to 4th on some of those hills, killing mileage.

    Break-in your car correctly, and you'll have years of joy out of it!
  • robgraverobgrave Member Posts: 65
    "You'll love your car, no doubt"

    I'm fairly fond of it already, but if I can get 39 mpg on the highway, I'll give it a big hug (!)

    "I am averaging about 27 MPG in mixed driving right now with heavy A/C use"

    That sounds about what I get now (mixed driving) without AC. I wonder how much difference AC really makes, anyway.

    Robgrave
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I wonder how much difference AC really makes, anyway.

    I've always heard about 5-10%, depending on vehicle.

    Don't forget, my "mixed" driving could be different from yours. Mine is about 50% Birmingham Interstate driving (60-75 MPH)/ 50% suburban 30-0-50-0 MPH red light driving. I'm not a big revver unless I have to be to pull out safely or merge properly, so 3,000 RPM is usually about the top end of my normal driving range.
  • robgraverobgrave Member Posts: 65
    Yes, you are right. Everybody's "mix" is a little bit different.

    As far as the max of 3000 rpm is concerned, I've made it a point to stay under that during the break-in period, and it looks like I'll keep right on with it. Best for mileage, and really, perfectly adequate for power and acceleration under all but the most unusual circumstances. The fact that it is possible to drive a 4 cylinder Accord that way indicates -- as far as I'm concerned -- what a finely engineered automobile it is.

    Robgrave
  • foonafoona Member Posts: 18
    VP comes with only 2 speakers. Are the wires in place for the other speakers that the LX has? So I could just by some aftermarket speakers and pop them in.

    IMO the VP seem like a pretty good deal relative to the LX.
  • mrbill1957mrbill1957 Member Posts: 823
    I'm assuming you only have door speakers?

    If the wires are in the back, you should easily see the plugs next to where the speakers go.

    Just installing speakers may not work. The radio will also need outputs for 2 more speakers. Does the radio have both a BALANCE and FADER controls? If not, then it only has outputs for 2 speakers.

    Mrbill
  • drummer13drummer13 Member Posts: 13
    Does anyone know who makes this sound system? It sounds great.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Honda has been with Panasonic for a long time, and I think they still are.
  • drummer13drummer13 Member Posts: 13
    Thanks !
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    A large local newspaper is looking to interview consumers who have recently went away from purchasing a Ford and decided on a Toyota, Honda or Nissan vehicle instead. Please send an e-mail to ctalati@edmunds.com no later than Wednesday, September 6, 2006 by 5:30 PM PT/8:30 PM ET containing your daytime contact information.

    Thanks,
    Chintan Talati
    Corporate Communications
    Edmunds.com
  • blaneblane Member Posts: 2,017
    "who have recently went away"?
  • master1master1 Member Posts: 340
    She means people who used to own an American car and went to Japanese.
  • dairyshickdairyshick Member Posts: 129
    I'm possibly picking up an Accord V6 6MT this week, but I will be taking a 2500 mile road trip about a week after that. Is that too much stress to put on a new engine with only a handful of miles on it?
  • ray_h1ray_h1 Member Posts: 1,134
  • ray_h1ray_h1 Member Posts: 1,134
    ))"I will be taking a 2500 mile road trip about a week after that. Is that too much stress to put on a new engine with only a handful of miles on it?"((

    Not only is your plan not too stressful on a new engine, it's the perfect opportunity to ideally run-in your new car's engine! :) Expect a little oil consumption initially, so monitor oil consumption at each fill-up during the first 500-600 miles. When safe to do so, coast down to about 30 mph and then accelerate (without forcing a downshift) back up to about 60 mph repeatedly for nine or ten cycles. This loads the piston rings and valve seals with vacuum when coasting down, and then loads the piston rings and valve seals with positive pressure when accelerating - a very reliable, but gentle method to seat the piston rings squarely to their bores. I'd also recommend limiting the cruising speed to 65 mph for the first 500-600 miles. (Be prepared for middle finger salutes - even if you're in the far right lane... No one ever said doin' the right thing would be easy or popular.) No "drive-it-like-ya'-stole-it" acceleration runs during that time, either, and avoid taking the running-in motor beyond 4,000 rpm, too. After that 500-600 mile run-in, drive like ya' normally do. Your initial consideration for the well-being of your new engine will have set the stage for a very long wearing, low oil consumption engine.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    I'm possibly picking up an Accord V6 6MT this week, but I will be taking a 2500 mile road trip about a week after that. Is that too much stress to put on a new engine with only a handful of miles on it?

    You should not drive at the same speed (rpm) for extended periods. The first 600 miles should be driven at varying speeds. If you can, break the engine in (600 miles) before you drive on the highway at a constant speed for extended periods. Cruising down the interstate at 65 mph for 2 hours straight, would be a no-no. I would try to break the engine in before the trip.
  • master1master1 Member Posts: 340
    I would not take that care for the trip. But if you do, like another post said, do not travel at the same RPM too long, and don't go faster than 65mph until 600 or 700 miles. But it's not a good idea since it will make driving uncomfortable too.
  • blaneblane Member Posts: 2,017
    master1,

    You missed the point.
  • ezshift5ezshift5 Member Posts: 858
    .....M1, not spelling....

    ...but grammmar......

    .... is Blane's focus.........

    ..ez..

    ;)
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    I just found out that my 2 day old Accord has a faulty lock mechanism for folding down the rear seat from inside the car with the master key. It works fine from the trunk, but when I try to do it with the key, it just would turn a full quater circle. Does anyone have a quick home fix before I take the car in? Thanks.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Hey guys, is it REALLY necessary to keep the RPM below 3K and speed below 65 mph? The manual's break-in setion makes no mention of these practices. You'd think if it's necessary, they would've put them in? I was under the impression that the old break-in practise are out of date with modern engines, no? I understand this is still a highly debatable issue. I now have 130 miles on the car and I regret for not observing these so far. But I think I'll be more careful from now on. Better be safe than sorry.

    BTW, what about the miles racked up in test drives? I doubt people are nearly as respectful to the future owners when they test drive the cars.
  • bolivarbolivar Member Posts: 2,316
    Why?

    You paid big money for a new car, with a 3 year/36,000mile warranty.

    Use it.
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Oh come on you guys, lighten up a bit here.

    Sometimes we are given stuff to copy and paste and we do what they ask. Not everyone who is a member here, nor everyone who works here, knows English as a first language.

    Who cares whether things are exactly grammatically correct? This is not the grammar/spelling/perfect English Forum, it's a place to talk about cars.

    So let's drop these kinds of comments and stick to what we're here to discuss, okay?

    Thanks!
  • ray_h1ray_h1 Member Posts: 1,134
    You own or lease the car, so you can run the mechanicals in any way you please. My '96 Accord's owner's manual recommended avoiding hard braking, hard acceleration, and full-throttle starts for the first 600 miles. There were no suggested cruising speed limitations. I don't know whether Honda's changed its recommendations a decade later. On the other hand, my '03 Sonata's owner's manual recommends all the former and holding cruising speed at or below 55 mph and avoiding engine speeds in excess of 4,000 rpm for the first 1,200 miles. In each case I observed the manufacturer's recommendations since I keep my cars a long time. Nevertheless, there isn't a car made that can't achieve 150,000+ miles even if it's had the livin' snot beat out of it right from the get-go. Whether initial driving considerations will help achieve 350,000+ miles are where questions arise. Most peope won't keep a car that long, anyway.

    (Your observation about how cars were driven when demonstrated is a valid question. Some prospective buyers or lookie-looz consider it their divine right to attempt achieving orbital velocity with absolutely no regard for the eventual buyer. Some dealerships maintain several cars just as demos/loaners. Others let Joe Sixpack take any car on the lot out for a weekend. I won't even consider purchasing a new car with more than 20 miles already clocked. Am I unyielding over the issue? You betcha - it's my money.)
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    My 06 manual says exactly the same things regarding break-in.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    I just called the dealer reagrding this problem, and interestingly I was told this is a common problem and has no cure! They did ask me to drop by and gave them a chance to fix it. We'll see what happens. But I have to say being a first time Honda owner, so far I'm a little disappointed with the "Honda quality".
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    if a faulty seat-folding mechanism is enough to make you disappointed in a car, its a darned good thing you DID get something with "honda quality." If you had to deal with the quality of some of the other manufacturers out there, you'd be ready to shoot yourself within a year.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Relax man. I think Honda can take a little knocking on its own. We bought a Chevy Malibu new in 02 and that car never had a single problem in the 3 years we owned it. I think I was justified in feeling a little disappointed with my Honda considering it's brand new with 13 miles. But I am NOT throwing out the baby with the bath water. This IS indeed a minor issue.

    But you know what, I just came back from the dealership and they got it to work. The first person tried and couldn't get it to work, but the key worked in the second guy's hand right way. They were not sure what happened but I'm just glad it's resolved. Other that that, I'm loving my new car.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,769
    I'm totally relaxed. Not a problem.

    It just sounded like you weren't. Glad they fixed it and you are happy.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Hey guys, is it REALLY necessary to keep the RPM below 3K and speed below 65 mph?

    I haven't seen anything about limiting speed. I do remember seeing something about varying speeds (for the first 600 miles) which can be hard to do, if you forget about it while driving on a long highway with little traffic. Don't cruise down the interstate at a constant speed, for even as little as 30 minutes.

    As far as the test drive thing goes, I'm glad the salesperson went on test drives with the customers where I bought my car.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Yeah I see the recommendation for varying speeds a lot but the speed limit seems to be out of date based on what I read. Maybe those of you who're engineers on this board can straighten us out. Seems logical to me that Honda for sure would've mentioned this in the manual if they think this is a concern. But again maybe it is, just not for the first 200K miles.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Yeah, I don't know where the limit on speed and rpm came from. It seems to me, you would want to break the engine in through the entire rpm range. If you plan to run it that way after break-in.
  • master1master1 Member Posts: 340
    English IS my first language! HAHA! Just because I wrote care instead of cars! I was typing fast at work, LOL, that's funny! :D
  • dairyshickdairyshick Member Posts: 129
    I made a 150-mile trip last night to pick up an '06 EX-V6 6MT w/ navi. It's a graphite pearl with gray interior, which I never thought would look so nice!...the dealership was terrific -- Proctor Honda in Tallahassee, FL -- if anyone is in that general area, give them a look. No hassle pricing and very friendly...not pushy at all.
    I was also working with Honda of Panama City, but when I emailed the internet guy back to let him know I closed a deal with Proctor, he sent me back some pretty immature and cry-babyish emails that were pretty much giving me crap for not buying from him...it's a longer story than that, but that's the jist of it. Basically, from working with the internet guy, I wasn't too surprised by his email replies!

    Anyway, the navigation makes it a whole new car with all the bells and whistles it provides. The voice commands work pretty well for changing just about any setting in the car, as long as you speak clearly. I have a lot to learn about how to use some of its features, but so far, so good.
    My only concern so far is that my gas tank was just about full when I bought it, and now it's down to about a 1/3 of a tank with only 220 miles on it. (Also the total miles on the car) Should I expect low MPG's on the first tank? Well over 100 of those miles were highway in 6th gear at about 70-75 mph. I have taken it easy driving it so far, as I'm supposed to...I don't think I've topped much over 4K RPM's, so while I've been extremely impressed with the performance already, I haven't even tapped into its true potential!
  • richards38richards38 Member Posts: 606
    I think the reason for varying speeds during the first few hundred miles is to allow engine vacuum to suck oil onto the cylinder walls.

    When you take your foot off the accelerator, vacuum from the engine tends to draw oil up--it can't go too far because the new engine is tight. On old engines that burned oil, the blue smoke usually poured from the exhaust after the car had been coasting in gear and engine vacuum pulled oil into the combustion chambers past worn piston rings.

    Of course, I'm referring to cars of very long ago, but varying engine speeds is more likely to better lubricate pistons and cylinder walls than constant driving without coasting in gear.

    Not sure about the foregoing, but I'd bet it's correct. :)
  • ray_h1ray_h1 Member Posts: 1,134
    )) "I think the reason for varying speeds during the first few hundred miles is to allow engine vacuum to suck oil onto the cylinder walls. ... When you take your foot off the accelerator, vacuum from the engine tends to draw oil up" ((

    Tantalizingly close, but not quite ready for prime time. Varying engine speed by alternately applying light acceleration and coasting back down helps seat the piston rings to their bores* - literally "forcing" gentle, controlled wear to achieve a tight ring-to-bore seal. (While a brand new engine is "tight" in terms of bearing clearances, it's also at its worst in terms of piston ring sealing. That's the reason the oil level should be checked often during the first 500-600 miles - a new engine will use some oil during that period until the rings fully seat.) Oil is supplied under metered pressure from the oil pump to the cylinder bore surfaces from small holes intentionally drilled into the connecting rod's large end upper bearing area for that expressed purpose. In older and/or abused engines, oil is, indeed, "sucked" into the cylinders during the intake stroke due to intake valve stem seal failure - the reason a trail of blue smoke is apparent when behind an affected car coasting to a stop sign or down a grade. But in this case, the excess oil is being drawn down from the cylinder heads, not up from the bottom end. That smoke's a sign of an engine in serious trouble.

    *The final machining process at the factory (and during a rebuild) for the cylinder bores is honing them with a special stone tool to a 60 degree cross-hatch pattern to roughen them very slightly (a glazed cylinder wall does not achieve a good seal with the rings). That precisely machined-in "roughening" accelerates seating of the rings when the engine is driven reasonably along with varying vehicle speeds during the nominal break-in period suggested by the automaker. Drivers who beat the livin' snot out of a new engine are simply accelerating excessive bore wear unnecessarily. But, their owners paid their own money, so it's their own choice. Fortunately for the automakers, the car will likely be out of warranty before the damage becomes apparent; thus, fixing the problem will be at the owners' expense, too. (The Zen of universal balance is a good thing, no? ;))
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Thanks for the education. What about limiting speed during break-in, or the occational high revving to 3-4K RPM? I've driven mine at or above 75-80 mph and allowed the engine to rev up to 4k RPM (it was so quiet that I forgot to up shift). Hope I didn't knock 100K miles off of the life of the engine.
  • carfanatic007carfanatic007 Member Posts: 267
    There is no need to not to go faster than 65 mph. Your not supposed to go "full throttle". Going 65 in a V6 is barely hitting what, 2500 RPMs? Just vary your speed and you will be fine. I have a 2006 SI which I just had delivered on 8/25/06. It is a great car, have about 360 miles on it. Waiting to take it into I-Vtec as soon as I get out of break in. That is 6000 plus rpm on the SI. All Hondas are great cars IMO. Enjoy.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Actually, for my 4-cyl engine 70 mph is more like 3k RPM.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    The rev-mapping goes like this for Accord Automatics; 1,000 RPM/30 MPH in 5th gear...

    Meaning:

    45 MPH - 1500 RPM
    60 MPH - 2000 PRM
    75 MPH - 2500 RPM
    90 MPH - 3000 RPM

    et cetera...

    Hope this helps.
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Don't know about the Auto tranny, but if memory serves (have had the car for 5 days) my 4-cy manual tranny revs just above 3K at 70 mph.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    That's why I mentioned the fact that it was for the 5AT. Thanks for the clarification on the fact that yours is a manual; that makes more sense.

    BTW, older Accords that came with the 4-speed Autos rev a little higher in top gear (about 2300 RPM at 60 MPH).
  • tamu2002tamu2002 Member Posts: 758
    Interesting, so the auto revs lower than the manual in top gear? Does it get better mileage too than the manual?
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I didn't realize that a manual ran that high of RPMs at 70. I might even be inclined to ask around if others' rev that high. My dad's 2005 EX Auto and my 2006 both rev at EXACTLY 2,000 RPM at 60 MPH; I know this as I drove his car today.

    The Auto gets 24/34 per the EPA, while the manual gets 26/34. (Assuming 4-cylinder, of course).

    Interesting, indeed.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.