BMW 3-Series 2005 and earlier

1182183185187188585

Comments

  • bmw323isbmw323is Member Posts: 410
    For what it's worth in my 2000 323i, when the air is on it seems to rob a great deal of power. It also seems to make the engine stall a bit when starting from a dead stop with the 5 speed. To me it feels like 10-15% of my power is gone.
  • brave1heartbrave1heart Member Posts: 2,698
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    difference between ellipsoid lenses and back-reflectors is that the lenses are a superior method of channeling light in a specific direction. On older BMWs, every car (I'm talking post '88 now) have them. When BMW launched the E36 as a '92 model, they ditched them for the US market !! One of my favorite expressions is how a car is "cheapened-up for the US market". As I'd previously discussed, these lenses add considerable extra cost and the way the marketing people see it (in America) is that if it ain't gonna sell more cars - save the money ! You may recall that earlier Lexus ES300 and Infiniti J30 cars all had one, if not, two sets of P.E.T. lenses - just like the Germans !!!! They subsequently felt that this extra cost was simply not worth it, or that they had established themselves as 'real' luxury cars and it was therefore no longer necessary. Of course, the new Q45 has those very trick 7 lenses xenons which are quite marvelous. It's BMWs commitment to safely and engineering that has them use them on xenon equipped cars (for dip beam).
    I did remember - thinking back to my comment about MBZ ditching the lenses, on new S class for eg, that they use an automatic self leveling system (like BMW) and I guess they feel that to be adequate for not offending oncoming traffic. Note to people with xenons (and please let me know when you've noticed this if you haven't already) when you go over a speed bump, or any medium speed bump or dip that would cause the headlights aim to alter, notice how the lights quickly aim down and then return !!! So cool! you can also see this by sudden acceleration (causing the car to point up and the lights down) or braking (visa versa). Most fascinating!! It calibrates itself when the lights are turned on - you'll notice (same for DRL) that if you turn the ignition on and turn on the lights at the same time, the light will dip down, then up to it's correct angle - it even factors in being parked on an incline!

    Now - let's call it at that. And I really don't want to go into global ownership of car companies. I spend my life considering badge engineering, platform sharing and autonomous ownership. An analogy on the Renault/Nissan thing would be like saying that Kraft Cheese Singles are basically the same as Marlboro cigarettes on the strength that Phillip Morris owns both companies. Now please - let's leave that one a closed book too!

    Thanks!!
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    When they (BMW) launched the 318ti in '94, the lenses were absent even in the European market to help keep the base price down. And I'm sure there were other international markets who forewent them for similar reasons.
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    The 'flagship' Mercedes CL (and SL) cars which were introduced after the new S class do use and ellipsoid lenses set up - no doubt because these cars represent the very pinnacle of Mercedes Benz engineering and therefore will not make any sacrifice.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Oddly enough, as I was passing BMWNA tonight, several 3-Series cars pulled out of the parking lot, back to back to back. The cars without the Xenon lights were actually far more annoying to my eyes than the brighter/better aimed Xenons.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • topspin627topspin627 Member Posts: 67
    I just got my new 2001 330I, (Black with black leather) with SP,PP, cold weather, HK, and Xeonen lights. I love this car. I paid list minus 1500 which was a little better than the Edmunds target price. Was that a good deal? Biggest surprise for me has been the HK sound system. I was ready to be dissapointed as I was sure the quality was not going to match up to my lexus for example but it's an excellent system with very high clarity and can be played at high volume if one likes with no distortion. At times the sport package can ride a little rough over uneven pavement but I love the look of the sport wheels, trim etc. and I think the seats are great. Is the rougher ride more a function of the tires?
    What I like best is that this is a Real sports car dressed up as a functional sedan. I'm quite sure that I will never really be able to push it to it's limits as I'm fairly conservative behind the wheel but I like the idea anyway.
    Does anyone have problems with the sport package of bottoming out or hitting the parking lot dividers as you pull the car in? It will take a little getting used to as my last two "cars" were suv's.
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    I'd say you did about as good as it was going to get. Sounds like a nice car! Remember to drive it 'sensibly' for the first 1200 miles!
  • brave1heartbrave1heart Member Posts: 2,698
    Your 330i sounds like a great package. "What I like best is that this is a Real sports car dressed up as a functional sedan." - very well said. That's how most of us feel about the 3-series as well. You may not push the limits of the car often but in case you need to, it's nice to know that you can. Just yesterday I was passing a car that cut my way off at first and I had to slam on the brakes at very high speed. This is the kind of "limit-pushing" that most of us may and probably will experience at some point. Yes, the sport package rides a little harsh on uneven pavement - I experienced that first-hand on NYC area roads a few months back. I think it is a function of the firm suspension settings and less so due to the performance tires. While I love the feel of the sport pack and I think it is a key contributor to the 3-series' body motions control, it is not perfectly suited for uneven and especially stripped asphalt.

    Curious about what made you switch from an SUV to a 3-series?
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    I was just at work when I discovered that one of my clients cars was in the drive way. The drivers window was broken and the paint had been scorched off the hood. The entire front end was a big melted mess and under the hood was horrific. The engines cam covers had been so heated that the majority of the top had melted, along with the thermoplastic intake manifold (which has an extremely high melting point). The car was a mess. Built about a week after mine, the 330i sedan was not one of the cars initially flagged in the recall. Having said that, I understand that this past week BMW issued a universal recall on all products as they now have a definitivly 'correct' replacement fan housing (the offender). It seems that they've even had replaced fans going out.
    Now - do not panic. The likely hood of this happening to anyone here (incidentally, we're only talking about 2001 models, generally built after November 2000) is slim. But if you drive an '01 BMW of any description (possibly excluding Z3) I strongly recommend stopping by your local dealer to have them determine if your fan needs replacing. They will no doubt need to order the part for you so expect to make two trips. Don't wait for a recall notice or white smoke from the front of the car before acting. This is a very serious situation and the possible out-comes are not pleasant to consider.
  • mfeldmanmfeldman Member Posts: 140
    i thought the fan problem only involved 5 speeds. has it broadened?
  • gurumikegurumike Member Posts: 442
    It was just 5 speeds (which the aforementioned car was) but at this stage (having witnessed similar incidents on X5 and 7 series) I'm not convinced that anyone should assume that their car is exempt. Just for piece of mind, at least phone your service writer and ask for an official decision as to whether or not you need to get that part swapped.
  • topspin627topspin627 Member Posts: 67
    Brave1heart, About 10-12 years ago in NY we got nailed with 17 big snow storms. After that nightmare I decided that I would always have an suv. Well a lot of time has passed and now we get 1-2 bad storms per year so I'm not as concerned. I had a 4runner which was great reliable transportation and a good value. Then I got an ML 320 which I also liked a lot. It was very comfortable on long rides and gave a nice European driving feel. But it came time to add a third car to the stable as my son just got his license and I decided that I wanted a sports car. I test drove the TT which was really cool but I still wanted some practability and I do a lot of driving for business. I thought the lack of a rear seat could become a pain and although I wanted a stick, I thought I'd regret it the first time I sat in bumper to bumper here in NY. (I was right as that kind of traffic has become the norm here.) I test drove the audi S4 which was a really cool car and they were dealing on it. I liked the quattro and it's scary fast. But in the end I felt that the BMW was much more solid feeling, looked better and I love the sound of the engine! I don't think there's a better car for twice the money. I was tempted to get a 525 as the lease was within pennies but it just doesn't have the edge or excitement of the 3 and is a bit more isolated. My best friend wanted me to get a Vette but I couldn't even find one to test drive and the chevy dealer looked at me blankly when I asked him when he'd have one in. Oh, I almost forgot, I drove the new jag x which was really nice but the lease deals were bad (like $75-100 per month more than my loaded 330 so I passed).
    I hope that long winded response is of some interest to anyone besides me. On a more mundane note, the black strips or molding on the doors tend to get white powder like streaks on them when they get dirty. They're not painted so they get this chalk look to them. Any remedies?
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
    I leased a 2002 Jetta 1.8T (Tiptronic)this morning for my wife and as a second car for me.

    During the test drive (alone) it became very clear that this car is quite fast, almost as fast as my 325i.

    The big difference is when you hit the gas in the Jetta it almost feels as if it wants to lift the front wheels off the pavement, good ole FWD. When I came off the highway at fast rate of speed, I certainly did not feel as confident nor could I corner at the same angle as I can in the 325i.

    The Jetta will provide my wife with a nice and safe auto with some very decent performance thrown in and it will provide me with the chance to continue to appreciate my 325i.
  • bmw323isbmw323is Member Posts: 410
    You said the S4 was "scary fast" almost like you beleive it is much faster than the 330i. Do you think the S4 is much faster/quicker? I'd like to hear your opinion. I just came home from our BMW clubs' auto cross today and there was an S4 there. Don't know if it was a Quattro. The Audi's times on the course were slower than most E36 M3's (I know that driving skill plays a big role as well). There were no 330's there to compare to. I beleive the S4 has 250 hp while the E36 M3 has 240.
  • topspin627topspin627 Member Posts: 67
    Yes, to me the S4 was noticeably quicker. I believe that the S cars are comparable to the M cars of BMW. So the S4's competition is really the M3 not the 330. The S4 felt lighter and that combined with the power made the car feel a little dangerous to me. It was too quick for my comfort level. (I think the 0-60 times are in the low 5 second range). The quattro kept the tires firmly planted around turns but to me the weight of the 330 made it feel more stable and gave me more confidence. The 330 is very quick to me and very nimble but also feels quite substantial. It feels like a large car when cruising but small when carving. The interior of the S4 was very nice but I felt that the materials were nicer and of better quality in the BMW. I also felt the 330 would be relatively trouble free and I'm not so sure that audi's track record is as good in this area.
    The bottom line to me is that there are a lot of good wannabes out there ie: IS300,A4,C320, but I like the original best. I think it's still ahead of the field. The amount of technology in these cars is really amazing if you take the time to read the manual as I have been doing.
  • dubdubsdubdubs Member Posts: 2
    Been driving my new 325i sedan for two months and loving it! I've noticed what can best be described as a resonating noise at the 3000 rpm mark. Has anyone had that 'problem'? The mechanic says that it's because of the way the engine vibration noise travels through the car. Any help?
    Thanks
  • edward5555edward5555 Member Posts: 15
    Hey folks...I just wanted to get some advice from people in the know..... I am planning a purchase in the next 30 days, and WAS sure that I wanted a 3 series and nothing else. However, I have recently noticed the Audi A4, with it's loads of features and comparable German engineering at a much cheaper price. Just wondering, is the BMW truly worth the extra money given it's lack of features? In other words, the Bimmer seems to be the car of choice for all the magazine editors who are always driving on windy roads in California, but how about for us working stiffs who aren't expert drivers and battle horrendous traffic daily. Any opinions would be appreciated. Thanks.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    When I first started driving my 1999 328i, I too noticed a very slight resonance around the 3000 RPM mark. By 8,000 miles, I could barely detect said resonance even when I tried, and sometime in the "Teens", it vanished completely.

    I have no idea whether there was a very slight imbalance (ie. one piston/connecting rod being slightly heavier or lighter than the rest) in the engine or some other cause for the resonance. I do know that engines in general have a tendency to "Smooth Out" over time as their components loosen up, and mine has done just that.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • shawn325ishawn325i Member Posts: 100
    with my 325i, I have noticed that if I tentitively step on the gas while in 1st or 2nd that the result is choppy performance. If I want to launch aggresively, stomp on the gas and carry the rpm's to 5000+ and continue this into 2nd, it's very smooth (3rd, 4th & 5th are always smooth). To me, this car is a dream when driven aggressively, but I find the transmission needs some work for casual driving OR I need to learn how to drive a manual. I have driven manuals for years in the past.

    Other then that, I love my car.
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    Being a rainy Sunday morning, I decided to once again price a new 3 series, only this time I considered a lease. My calculations appear to show a lease to be a poor financial option for obtaining a new vehicle. Here's why:

    The car: 2001 330i with options (amounts from BMWUSA.com)
    $36,610 MSRP
    $2500 Down
    36mo lease=$518


    Comparison 1, Lease or pay cash
    By leasing, you could take the cash leftover from the down payment and invest it. At the end of 36 months, you would have $24,343.50 if you could earn 10% on your invested cash (less with a lower ROI, more with a higher ROI).

    If you paid cash for the car, you would have the car instead of $24,343.50. Edmunds shows a '98 comparably equipped 328I valued at $22,774 (private party sale). It's impossible to estimate what a 3 year old 330i will sell for, but I believe it would be more than the investment return above.

    Comparison 2, Lease or borrow purchase amount

    Obviously, most of us can't pay cash, so the other option is to borrow from the bank. Assuming an 8% loan rate, the payments would be $1,068.88 with the above down payment over 36 months.

    If you leased the car and invested the remaining cash each month at 10%, you would have $23,016.91 at the end of 36 months, but no car. Again, I think you would come out ahead by not leasing.

    I left out tax considerations which hurt the lease numbers in terms of taxes on investment returns and deductions for home equity loans.

    Obviously, leasing allows you to get more car for your money if you can't swing the monthly payments for a loan, but it appears that you would be better off saving your lease payments for a year and getting a home equity loan.

    I performed these calculations in an Excel spreadsheet which I would be glad to send to anyone who was interested.

    I would appreciate anyone pointing out errors in my calculations or logic which may make leasing appear more attractive.

    -Murray
  • kevvy79kevvy79 Member Posts: 1
    I have a E46 328Ci, has anyone heard of any good ECU's? I read the occasional in the magazines, but I would rather hear from people who have to live eith them.
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    Murray,

    I have never seriously considered leasing or financing a car, not based upon economics as much as psychology. I figure if I can't afford to pay cash, I shouldn't buy. Started this a few decades ago with my first brand new car (1978 Datsun B210GX - $4,200 out the door) and have stuck to it ever since. It also helped get me a 1984 Toyota Supra at a discount when they were a hot car. The sales manager couldn't walk away from 160 $100 bills. Since then, I've used a check to avoid being questioned by the IRS or DEA!

    I couldn't help but notice that the $1,068 monthly payment on a 330i happens to be almost exactly what my monthly mortgage payments are on a house I purchased 12 years ago (thanks to some interim refinancing to get my rate down to 6%). Difference is, the house is now worth about $500k. Until I find a car that's going to appreciate 100%+ over 12 years, I think I'll stick to paying cash.

    Thanks for the analysis, though. It was very interesting.
  • skobolaskobola Member Posts: 207
    I had a 98 1.8T and changed it after 1.5 years for my 99 323i because I really did not like it. Turbo did not do much in hot south Florida climate, I guess, that Audi should rather consider an intercooled Turbo. Also, Audi cannot compare to BMW for driveability, that is, how it handles, etc. I did not have a quattro nor sport option on Audi, but I do not have it on a Bimmer neither. Some have compared A4 w/quatro, sport and 6 cylinder engines to the Bimmer, but then its price would be equal if not even more than a Bimmer... so again, I would opt for a Bimmer. In addition, I believe that now it would not be advisable to buy an A4 because there is a new model (new body) coming out, so you would buy a car that will be old in a couple of months.
  • edward5555edward5555 Member Posts: 15
    Wow, You are just the person I am looking for. Someone who has owned an Audi and a Bimmer. The attractive thing about the Audi is that it seems to give you more amenities for the price. But it sounds like you still think the Bimmer is better. I like the Bimmer more in every way, I just wanted to make sure that the extra money was for something substantive, and not just for the BMW nameplate. Thanks for the input.
  • edward5555edward5555 Member Posts: 15
    What should one pay for a 2000 Bimmer 323 Sedan, automatic, Premium package and leather interior? I know the Bimmers hold their value better than any car, but the prices I'm seeing are so high, that it seems you may as well buy new. I had the idea that a 99 323 sedan (as described above) is worth about 25k and the 2000 about 27K. Could anyone tell me if I am way off on this, or should I stick to my guns. Any info appreciated. Thanks
  • derprofiderprofi Member Posts: 250
    have you checked the Edmunds used pricing guide? Look for "Used Prices and Info" on the front page of this site.
  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    I clean those white streaks from my side & bumper moldings with Armorall, which I apply with an old cotton T-shirt.
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    Most people have no idea how to grasp time value of money. They see that they can get a much more expensive car than if they borrowed the money (maybe that's how all those $30k SUV's appeared over the last few years). I know people who actually believe it's good to run up their credit card and pay the interest! There's nothing wrong with borrowing money, but it should be done with some knowledge.

    I think the US would be much better off if time value of money was required teaching in high school math instead of, say, trigonometry. No one remembers what opposite over hypotenuse is anyway. It wouldn't even take a whole semester to teach all the formulas needed to do the analysis I did to come up with the numbers in my previous post. With a spreadsheet, it's a piece of cake!

    Anyway, I hope the numbers give some people insight into leasing.

    -Murray
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Forgetting for a moment the benefits of leasing cars (or for that matter, all capital goods) for a business, as I have seen the numbers, the cost of leasing a certain number of cars over a specific period of time (ie. 3 cars over nine years) is virtually the same cost as taking a loan out on the same cars for the same time. Both of which make more financial sense than paying for each car in one lump sum and then reselling them after three years.

    Anybody can come up with numbers that show less total dollars spent when cash is paid, however, what they are not factoring in is that you now have CASH tied up in a car. CASH is King folks, if used properly, the cash not tied up in a car can be made to grow at a conservative 15% year in and year out. That said, there is no way paying cash for a car is cheaper than leasing or borrowing if done right.

    In my case, I am part owner in several businesses, and ALL cars used by our employees are leased. By leasing, we do not have to mess with depreciation (our buddies at the IRS set forth some very prohibitive rules back in 1986 regarding how to depreciate automobiles), we simply take the cost of the lease as an expense, just like fuel, maintenance and insurance. Long story short, 90% of the lease on my car is paid in Pre-Tax income.

    In certain situations, leasing RULES.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • jthaijthai Member Posts: 15
    How does one conservatively grow their money at 15% year in year out? I assume we're talking about sums on the order of $30k here...

    My money market funds are yielding 3%, my bonds are yielding 5%, and my stocks are well, depreciating faster than a Aztek.
  • denkdenk Member Posts: 75
    Yes, please do tell us how we can conservatively grow our money at 15% year in and year out.
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    Shipo-

    I may have agreed with you 3 years ago, but if you've been able to show an average ROI over the last three years of anything over 10%, I want you as my financial advisor!

    That said, I was referring to personal leasing. I have no knowledge of the benefits associated with business leasing

    -Murray

    p.s. I ran the numbers on the examples from my earlier post with a 15% ROI. At the end of a 3 year lease, you would have $29,976.29 if you invested the cash and $24,853.38 if you invested the difference in payments, but no car.
  • asawasaw Member Posts: 54
    The prices (about 37K base) of these two fine cars are roughly the same in Vancouver. The 330i is about 5K more expensive.

    I was looking at either for my next car. Which would you go for, and why?
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    If you look at historical returns of a well-managed portfolio, the typical low end is 15% per year. The last year or two is simply an anomaly relative to the history of how investments work. IF you can predict in advance when the markets will take a sustained dip, then this discussion is moot because you are already filthy rich. For the rest of us, we must play the historical averages.

    As for owning a car outright, who cares? Whether you pay cash up front, or finance it for three years, you still end up owning an asset that is depreciating every day. Sooner or later, you are going to sell it and get another one. Why tie up you money when it could be making more money for you elsewhere? The advantage of leasing is that you target a residual value after a certain period of time and then finance the depreciated portion of the car, then time for a new car. You are then able to keep more of your money working for you, in the long run, leasing will be less expensive, unless, that is, you intend on keeping your car until it bites the dust. Even then, financing is probably cheaper than paying cash.

    Another advantage of leasing as an individual that I forgot to mention yesterday is that on cars with a high residual (like the 3-Series), you can save quite a bit of money because of the lower sales tax. Most states require sales tax to be paid only on the depreciated portion of the car when it is leased, however if you buy (financed or cash), you pay sales tax on the entire car. In my case, the residual on my car is about $28,000 after 39 months, here in New Jersey; we have a 6% sales tax rate, which equates to $1,680 in sales tax that I did not pay. Sadly some states (Illinois for instance) require you to pay the tax on the full negotiated value of the car.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • rpadillarpadilla Member Posts: 53
    I remember a discussion about the benefits of Zaino, and other car care products, and I thought I'd share the following site with everyone -- http://autosupermart.net/forums/Car_Care/posts/633.html


    Regards....Ray

  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    I know what you mean by rough shifting at low rpms. I too noticed that, one really needs to focus when shifting from 1st to 2nd at low (<3k). Granted, I'm still new to this (1 year or so), but I don't remember having this problem on the Honda.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    from my first autocross, and what humbling experience. The fastest time was posted by a modified E46 M3. I did notice how great BMWs really are though. No matter how badly I was running the course, car stayed on course, and never lost its composure.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go sign up for the next car control clinic, and autocross.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    I have been driving since the early 1970&#146;s and since then, I have been humbled a couple of times.

    In 1978, I was driving my Challenger RT down a freeway in San Diego and as I was passing a clapped out looking Chevy Pickup truck with a very bad looking &#147;Side Pipe&#148; exhaust setup, he blipped his throttle a couple of times. I simply dropped to third and nailed it, the next thing I knew, I was looking at his taillights pulling away from me FAST. When he shut down about a half mile down, flames about 5&#146; long were coming from those side pipes. Very embarrassing.

    In 1985, I was driving a very humbling car (Fiat Uno Diesel &#150; with a whopping 36 hp!) through Europe. As we were struggling up a mountain in Switzerland, I saw a blur in my mirror come around a curve behind me and close the mile or so gap between us in about 30 seconds. As the 911 Turbo passed us, a shock wave pushed the Fiat at least a lane over to the right. I figure he was moving at least 100mph faster than us! Truly humbled in the face of a god-like machine.

    Yesterday, as I was pulling away from the northbound traffic light on the West Side Highway at 57th street, I accelerated up to about 60 and set the cruise control to hold that speed (since the WTC incident, the New York State Police have taken to patrolling the WSH), discretion being the better part of valor. All of the sudden, I saw another blur in my mirror (this one VERY RED). As the Viper GTS passed me with an easy 70mph cushion, I noticed that in his wake was what looked like a Kawasaki Ninja ZX-12R (I am making my guess here based upon the configuration of the pipes). Given the way the lights are timed, my best guess is that they were at the 54th or 55th Street light when I was at 57th Street. I figure that by the time they had passed me, they had traveled about twice as far as me, and were at more than double my speed. That was humbling enough to cause me to drive home and clean out the garage.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • edward5555edward5555 Member Posts: 15
    BMW's are overrated, overpriced pieces of junk. German cars period are overrated. They cater to all the race dar driver wannabees, or people so obsessed with German prestige that they don't know anything else to buy. The Japanese make the real cars, and respect the consumer enough to give them the amenities they want and need. And by the way, Edmunds TMV pricing is still way off. It over-inflates the real price you need to pay for a car by at leat a thousand bucks. Anyway, that's my two cents for whatever its worth.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    two cents really doesn't get you much these days...
  • millerro3millerro3 Member Posts: 136
    What happened to make you change your opinion so much edward5555?

    your last couple of posts here you were saying you had narrowed it down to the BMW, then you were comparing the Audi and BMW, now ALL GERMAN cars suck?

    What happened???????????????
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    You own a German car (based upon your profile) and you have been shopping for a German car, and now all of the sudden, they all suck!?!

    It sounds to me like you ran into a bad dealer. No one here has ever said that the dealers for the German cars were universally great, in fact, there are several that are clearly BAD, however, does that mean that the cars themselves are BAD?

    If you find that a Japanese car meets your automotive requirements better than a German car, good for you, buy it. For many of us that is just not the case.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • derprofiderprofi Member Posts: 250
    really v_tech in disguise. Perhaps he finally lost it and is showing his true colors. :)

    Color me a "race dar [sic] driver wannabee" I guess.

    I, for one, couldn't be happier with my dealer. $1400 over ED invoice with Munich pickup 9 short weeks from today. Compared to that deal, any Japanese 330i competitor that comes to mind is the one that's overpriced.
  • jrc330jrc330 Member Posts: 15
    I've owned 3 Japanese cars, 90 Civic SI, 94 Integra LS and 97 Integra GSR, and still own a 2001 Accord V6, and I paid $500 over invoice for all four and they were and are great cars and I wouldn't have a bad thing to say about them, but not one of them gave me the complete package that my 99 328I did. Handling, comfort, performance, looks, quiet on the highway at 80mph and one hell of a package for the money. Granted they may cost more then a similarly spec'd Japanese car, but in my mind they are well worth the price. One of the great things about this country is the freedom of choice and opinion. Enjoy your new Japanese car.

    PS. My 2002 330i will be ready early Novemeber and I paid $700 over invoice with all the bells and whistles.
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    I agree with your assessment. If you can be assured of investing at 10-15% annual rate of return, leasing is the way to go.

    As I said, my cash buying decision is as much pyschological as it is financial. I've watched my high tech portfolio drop 50%+ over the last 18 months. While it's not causing me to jump out of any windows, I'm also glad I don't have a $500 to $1,000 car payment coming due every month to rub it in.

    I own a real estate development company, so like you, know the advantages of leverage. I may consider leasing my next car if, and only if, I've already made the decision to buy for cash and THEN do the lease analysis to see if I think I would be better off putting my cash elsewhere. Given the overly depressed state of the market, I very well might.

    P.S. What's up with this edward555 guy?? Looks like he forgot to take his Prozac today.
  • derprofiderprofi Member Posts: 250
    Wow, $700 over invoice is pretty sweet if it includes advertising fees and the "processing" fees some dealers try to charge. Does it?
  • jrc330jrc330 Member Posts: 15
    2nd Car that I purchased from this dealer, and I have a good relationship with the salesman. I also originally ordered a 2001 that they could not provide to me so they felt obligated to work with me on pricing. They are a stand up dealer... BMW of Peabody.
  • derprofiderprofi Member Posts: 250
    they definitely want to keep you as a satisfied customer, now and in the future, which is fantastic. From what I've seen here in the past, I seem to remember their best deals after negotiation were around $1500 over invoice. Congrats!
  • autoeconautoecon Member Posts: 4
    I have a 2001 330i PP/Step. Took delivery at the end of August. It feels great to be driving a BMW again! I had a 540i in 1998 and traded it in on an Acura 3.2TL. Reasons for the stupidity: got married and bought a house, so I needed to save some money. There's nothing like the feel of a rear wheel drive car with near perfect weight distribution. Nothing wrong with the Acura, but it was VERY boring. Looking forward to seeing 1200 on the odometer of my 330 so that I can open it up a little more.

    I have one minor complaint: the heel of my shoe keeps sliding off the raised section of the floormat when I hit the brake pedal. Anyone else ever had an issue with this? And, are there any other custom fit floormats available that don't have the raised section with the BMW logo? Thanks for the input.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.