BMW 3-Series 2005 and earlier

1404405407409410585

Comments

  • eengstroeengstro Member Posts: 16
    Which part of the North State are you in? I'm from Mt. Shasta originally, although I live in southern CA now. Rural northern CA is one of the most beautiful places in the world, IMNSHO. :)

    Congrats on the new BMW!

    Eric
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    I've heard this question a couple times now -

    Why do you drive your BMW in the winter? You should be able to afford a second car.

    Hmmm, why do I drive my BMW in the winter? Could it be-

    -the heater pumps out warm air faster than any car I've ever driven?

    -the heated seats?

    -the brightest lights of any car I've ever driven?

    -excellent safety?

    -traction & stability control?

    -winter tires are cheaper than the insurance on a second car?

    -excellent handling in ALL conditions?

    -it's just plain fun to drive in ALL conditions?

    -I like watching Camery's wallow in the white stuff while I cruise on by?

    Why wouldn't I drive a BMW in the winter?

    Because it has RWD!

    Gee, 20 years ago, people must of parked their cars for 4 months every year before FWD was popular!

    -murray
  • climatecontrolclimatecontrol Member Posts: 15
    I was just stating an opinion. I was thinking in terms of someone who wanted to save a few $$$ on a budget that also wanted more power than the 325, but couldn't top the premium for a new or newer 330. A well kept M3 CPO is not a bad investment between 25-30K.

    Maybe I'm thinking in terms of a common person who has bills, kids, college loans, etc..(i.e. the avg 3 series owner) because I know what it's like living on a budget and also would like to have an entertaining car at the same time. I'm realistic. I didn't grow up with money to waste. I guess that's why I'm a sociologist/educator and not on Wall Street.
    In honesty, only a small percentage of people really use their automobiles for extreme purposes. Prime example, how many people actually take their M3 on a track or take 5,000lb SUVs around town fully loaded with people and towing a boat everyday? I'm happy for you brave heart if you do have the extra time and cash to drive your BMW on the track. If we all had the money to burn, I don't think half of us would own 3 series BMWs or would bother to post in this chat room. Most of us would just buy a M5 and call it a day if we had money to burn. We're common people looking for a small amount of entertainment in a everyday automobile.
    I'm not trying to step on any toes, just stating an opinion.
  • imadroneimadrone Member Posts: 33
       MG330i, we'll make the decision next week re a 2003 in April vs a 2004 in October. Leaning toward the 2004 for the reasons that leenelsonmd mentioned, plus Bavaria is really beautiful in the autumn. Hoping that BMW will add a few goodies in 2004 as standard that are now optional. Delayed gratification heightens the anticipation.

       Eengstro, we live in Redding, and view your 14,162' Mt. Shasta 300+ days per year. Moved here 24+ years ago with never a single regret. My commute is 8 minutes each morning, by foot, from home to Mercy Medical Center up on the hill. My beloved drives only a half mile to work, hence our satisfaction with our gracefully aging vehicles. But, a dear friend was killed in a head-on on I-5 Labor Day while returning from Sacramento, when an inebriated southbound 18 year old in a hot '68 Camaro lost control, crossed the median strip through the oleander, and ended up in the northbound lane. Hit my friend's older Volvo in which he was fully restrained, but with no airbags. Massive head injuries from the dash, but with airbags he would have walked away. Anyway, we love to drive, and we love to live. New Bimmer seems the logical and prudent way to combine the pleasure of precision engineering with the obvious superiority of state of the art safety features. Our old Benz, Volvo, and BMW were considered very safe vehicles---in their time. But it is time to recognize mortality and the transient nature of existence. And---the 3 Series is one beautiful piece of metal sculpture.

       Hope you make it back up to the northstate one of these days. Some mighty fine mountain roads as you well recall.
  • seivwrigseivwrig Member Posts: 388
    I think I would wait to see what the rumor mill drums up. The 5 series is supposed to be released in Germany during Oct/Nov 2003. The 2004 3 series will be in the end of the run. BMW has been known to do some strange things during the end of a model's run. Since the 5 series will get a set of new engines, I could see BMW placing those engines in the last year of the 3 series. They have done this before.
  • abcnycabcnyc Member Posts: 101
    I had no problems leaving for work yesterday morning with 5-6" down, but I did get stuck trying to get into my driveway coming home in the evening. There must have been 9-10" in my driveway and I could not plow through the stuff. I finally had to back my car into the driveway just to get it off the street - I was worried a snowplow may be coming through our roads. I had to shovel the driveway to get my car into the garage. Boy that additional 4" from morning to night made a big difference. It just reminds me that while the BMW is good in snow (with winter tires), it is not an SUV to plow through the big stuff. The DCS does seem to limit your ability to try to muscle your way through the snow. I wonder if I would have fared better turning it off.
  • eengstroeengstro Member Posts: 16
    I'm sorry to year about your loss. Dumb kids in fast cars scare me more than any other type of driver. Fortunately, the 3 Series is one of the safest vehicles on the market today--both in protecting you and yours in a collision, and in avoiding an accident in the first place.

    I make it to the North State from time to time. I just spent Thanksgiving in Mt. Shasta, and will return for Christmas. My ideal route home is to take SR-1 (The Pacific Coast Hwy, for our friends back East) from San Luis Obispo, along the cliffs of Big Sur, over the Golden Gate Bridge, around the Lost Coast (so named because the area around Cape Mendacino is too rugged for a coastal hwy), to Eureka. From there, turn east on SR-299, and head over the mountains, through Weaverville, and on to Redding. From Redding, I-5 is quite scenic for the final stretch through the Sacramento River canyon, to Mt. Shasta.

    I may attempt this route for my Christmas trip, if SR-299 is clear of snow. (Winter is generally the best time to drive SR-1, as most of the tourists and RVs are home.)

    California is truly a beautiful State, and is well-suited for touring in a BMW.

    Eric
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Sorry about your loss.

    I agree with you the new 3 series (even though it's been out a while) in my opinion is near the top of the list as one of the best looking designed cars. Somehow BMW managed to capture the right amount of gracefully flowing curves with raw muscular power.

    While there are cars in it's class that do some things better than the 3-series, nobody does it ALL better, with the class and panache of the 3er.

    Just for the record, the Porsche (not the Boxster) is at the top of the list.
  • mg330cimg330ci Member Posts: 162
    I had to made this Salomonic decision:

    A. Sell my worthless but faithful 1992 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS 5-speed with 170000 miles and buy winter tires for the Bimmer (for the same price). Drive with snow tires for 4 months, knowing that I would only need them for about 12 days of those 120 (of course, your snow-meter/situation will vary).

    or

    B. Keep the Bimmer on summer tires, keep the Eclipse and drive it during those snow days.

    Well, mathematically, B costs the same as A, provides me with a backup car in case of emergency, and saves the Bimmer from the rock-salt splash/shower during those nasty days. So I decided to keep the Eclipse, and follow closely the weather channel ;)
  • kominskykominsky Member Posts: 850
    That's exactly what I did last year. I had a '93 Altima when I got my Ci and kept it for winter use. It had ~160K miles and I really didn't care too much if something bad happened to it. This past Spring, though, it would've required several hundred $$ worth of repairs to pass inspection. It still ran well, but exhaust and brakes were ready for replacement. I decided to donate it to the Lung Foundation which turned out to be a pretty good deal.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    There's always choice C. Move to a sunny state. ;)
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    A buddy of mine just picked up his Passat wagon last night. VW recommends premium fuel (92+ octane), but apparently VW recently determined that premium fuel doesn't make much difference in the colder months.

    This makes sense based on my limited knowledge of higher octane fuels. Higher octane gas doesn't have any more BTU/gallon, but the additional octane helps prevent pre ignition of the fuel, aka knocking. Higher octane allows high compression engines to adjust the timing to get more horsepower from the engine without knocking. Colder temperatures should reduce the engine temperature somewhat which should help reduce pre ignition of the fuel.

    Does the engine adjust for the lower ambient temperature without the added octane in the fuel? Does it matter what grade fuel is in the tank when the temps dip below freezing?

    -murray
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    When we bought my wife's Volvo, I got the '95 Mazda 626 to drive during the winter and parked the Miata. This was an easy choice since the 626 was safer, had a better heater and just as reliable as the Miata.

    I could have kept the 626 as a winter car when I got the 325i, but the BMW is safer, has a better heater and should be more reliable. I'm certain I wouldn't make much in resale by parking the BMW during the winter. Plus I got $5000 for the 626 which would just go down while it was parked for 8 months per year.

    The problem with older cars is they're more likely to break down which can be life threatening in Wisconsin in January.

    -murray
  • riezriez Member Posts: 2,361
    Wife's '00 323iA needed a new battery. Battery died 3 times in last 5 weeks. Twice they said it was fine. This time they said just replace it. Only 38,200 miles. Car built 5/00 and put in service 8/00. Fortunately they replaced the battery at no charge. They said nothing is wrong with the charging system.

    Makes me think about all the articles and letters I've seen the past year in Roundel and Bimmer magazines regarding BMW batteries. But in most cases the original battery lasts for a long time and the BMW replacement battery quits after only 2 or so years. Wonder if BMW is cutting corners on batteries?
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    there are two main reasons for this:

    1) the temperature of the engine itself is lower. knock comes easiest in the dead of summer.

    2) in most areas, winter fuel mixes contain oxygenates such as ethanol or MTBE (now being phased out). oxygenates have poor energy content but very a high anti-knock index.

    -Colin
    (IT guy for an energy company)
  • twoof1twoof1 Member Posts: 308
    Few people realize that you can actually drive along 90+% of the California coastline. I read your post and started drooling again. My wife and I drove Hwy. 1 from San Clemente to Eureka in our CRX SI back in the good 'ol days. Still one of the most fond driving memories I have. Nothing I have ever driven beats the areas between Cambria to Carmel or from Stinson Beach to Mendocino. If anyone has the time and the opportunity, I would highly recommend it.
    I just wish now with life's realities of a job, kid mortgage etc... that I could bail with my bimmer for a week to blaze up the coast.
  • ddtigger1ddtigger1 Member Posts: 9
    Hello All, I am looking to buy my first BMW. I am looking at a 1996 328i. It has 84,000 miles automatic, and has all the bells and whistles. What can you tell me about this one? I do know it belongs to the wife of the car dealership owner,(not a BMW Dealership). I ran the vin through carfax and the and it has had two owners.
    They are asking $14,900.00
    any input would be great. Thank you
    David
  • msealsmseals Member Posts: 257
    I am not sure, but that price seems kind of high. That is the first year of the 328i I believe. No biggie, since the car was always the same as the 325i for the most part, just got the bigger 2.8L 6cyl. It is a light fast agile car. Make sure all the maintenance was done if possible. Ask where they had the maintenance done. I have a friend who has over 200k miles on his 1996 328i and he still has it.
  • mg330cimg330ci Member Posts: 162
    2 clicks away.
    Agree with mseals

    Dealer Trade-In: What Others Are Getting $11,427
    Private Party: What Others Are Getting/Paying $13,078
    Dealer Retail: What Others Are Paying $15,357
  • brave1heartbrave1heart Member Posts: 2,698
    Dunlop M2 Winter Sports (205/55/16) on Mille Miglia Spiders. Traction in snow is very good and braking is awesome. The question is not "How much speed do I need to pick up to make it up that hill with the summer tires?" - it's more like "Will the DSC kick in if I have to stop halfway up that hill and need to get going from standstill?"

    Anyhow, some observations from changing the tires:
    1. My rears would not come off. I kept trying to pull them out and they would not even budge. I ended up calling my service guy at the dealership and asked them if they spray anything to help the wheel come off. He said "give it a real good kick or use a rubber mallet" I told him the rubber soles on my shoes were better than a rubber mallet. It took 7-8 very good kicks before the rears came off - has anyone else experienced that? No problem with the fronts at all - it was just the drive wheels. Last time the rims had been taken out was 4 months/12K miles ago.
    2. The Star 44s with Sumitomo HTR Z II weigh 48.5 lbs a pop. My snow tire setup weighed exactly the same. Aren't the 44's supposed to be lighter than the knock-offs?!?
    3. The Mille Miglia Spiders are VERY easy to scratch compared to the 44s. They may weigh the same but there is a reason why the 44's are so much more expensive. Not to mention that at high speed, they are much less likely to split up.
    4. Not one set of lug nuts had the same torque settings. The rear left needed all the force that I could apply. The front right ones would've come off even if I had used just one hand. You'd think the dealers do at least that right...
    5. If you do not have a 17 mm socket yet, make sure to get a long socket. Even the long socket does not clear the fender completely and it is easy to scratch it.
    6. The $25 clicking type torque wrench from the Tirerack worked great. Similar torque wrench at Sears was ~ $60.

    Bring on the snow!
  • mg330cimg330ci Member Posts: 162
    1. Use Anti seize compound
    2. Who installed your Wheels? did not use a torque wrench? = most frequent cause of disc brake warping and vibration.

    Traditionally, I have de-torqued---re-torqued the wheels after changing tires to avoid this. If they use an air wrench, you can bet all the lug nuts will end up different
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    If you do not have a 17 mm socket yet, make sure to get a long socket. Even the long socket does not clear the fender completely and it is easy to scratch it.

    I like the 4 end, cross shaped lug wrench. Lots of torque and it spins easily once the nuts are loose.

    -murray
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Trying to get up a hill in my 330i with stock tires, had to get a running start. DSC kicked in a couple of times, I didn't go very fast, and kept the RPMs below 2K.

    Car in back of me a front-wheel drive Mazda, couldn't make it up the same hill. My monsta' SUV yawned as it went up the hill.

    My conclusion though, is in snow deeper than 6-8 inches, I wouldn't even take the Bimmer out, snow tires or not. The front-end is way to low to go through high powder and the low profile tires do not really do a good job on unplowed streets. Snows I'm sure would be better, but if we have heavy snows this year, the Bimmer is going to see a lot of the garage.
  • abcnycabcnyc Member Posts: 101
    I had the same problem with my rear wheels being stuck. I tried kicking, 2x4 lumber, etc. I finally got the wheels to break loose by jacking up the car, removing the lug nuts, and then lowering the car slowly onto the tires to get the wheels to break fre. There was a lot of gunk on the hubs. I put antiseize on them to hopefully prevent this next time.

    What torque did you use ? The manual specifies 100 Nm, but I read that was changed to 120 Nm. I called the service department and they told me 90-95 Nm is standard. So I just torqued everything to 100 Nm.
  • fomentarfomentar Member Posts: 49
    Has anyone experienced the effectiveness of the clear protective film? I am considering it versus a bra, since I drive significant highway miles with corresponding front end paint damage issues. Also, is the BMW security system a worthy accessory versus an aftermarket system?
  • fowvayfowvay Member Posts: 29
    For the people experiencing poor AM radio reception - if you are still under warranty then you can request that the servicing dealership comply with Service Issue 65 01 99 which addresses the poor reception common to the E46 chassis.

    During assembly the coaxial cable that runs from the antenna in the rear window was not tightened correctly where it attaches to the signal booster which is mounted on the driver side "C" pillar. A simple removal of the interior "C" pillar cover will expose the amplifier and the loose cable. Retighten the cable (snugly using önly finger strength) and reinstall the panel and the problem should be cured. If doing this procedure yourself I recommend that you reattach all wiring into the amplifier with a small dab of dielectric grease to seal out moisture and dampen vibration.
  • brave1heartbrave1heart Member Posts: 2,698
    I used 88 lb/ft. The older manuals are incorrect - BMWNA now recommends 88 lb/ft (120 Nm).
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Regarding poor AM radio reception, I had that procedure done as well as having the dealers replace the door pillar tweeters. I didn't make any difference.

    The AM radio reception is the absolute worst. However, FM radio and CDs play flawlessly. They have the just the right balance of highs, mids and lows.
  • ryokenryoken Member Posts: 291
    Hello, all. I've lurked here long enough, I guess it's time to post, since I finally got myself into a position to acquire a sport sedan. I tried a lot: Cadillac CTS, Volvo S60 T5, BMW 330i, Infiniti G35, Audi A4 3.0 CVT, and Acura 3.2TL Type S. Narrowed the choice down to the G35 and the 330i, and went back yesterday morning to drive them both again for a more direct comparison. (Too many cars in too short a time.. my head was spinning.) Went back to BMW yesterday afternoon to buy a car.

    Steel Blue/Gray, Premium, Sport, Xenon, Steptronic.

    Lo and behold, there was already one unclaimed on a ship due to arrive in port on the 21st. I was prepared to wait until March, and now I'll have my car by Christmas! Merry Christmas to me.... :)
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    I haven't used the AM radio much, but I had no trouble picking up WGN (Chicago) north of Madison, WI (about 150 miles) in my 325i. I wouldn't call that poor reception.

    -murray
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    Even though I can pick up stations far away, the AM side of the radio is just plain lousy.

    ryoken - Merry Christmas to me, merry christmas to me. What made you pick the 330i over G35? There is certainly some sentiment on these forums, the 330i is overpriced, underpowered, and long in the tooth.
  • ryokenryoken Member Posts: 291
    kdshapiro, overpriced is relative. If I'm willing to buy it, then it's not overpriced, is it? It certainly doesn't feel underpowered. A 225hp 330i goes toe-to-toe with a 260hp G35, any day. I like the styling on both cars. Granted, the G35 is a little bigger, has reclining rear seats, and can be had with GPS-Nav and all the trimmings for less than a 330i w/o GPS and a couple other items. The Steptronic beats the transmission on the G35, though. It has normal and sport modes, and goes fully manual when you ask it to. The G35's transmission is more like a regular transmission with D5, D4, D3, D2, and 1 - with a fancy gate for selecting them; I didn't like that. The color choices on the G35 are more limited (I like gray interiors).

    But, ultimately, the final deciding factor was this: I couldn't keep my hands off the BMW brochure, I kept lurking on the 3-series town hall boards (while only skimming the G35 boards), and after the 330i test drive, my wife asked me, "Why did you keep saying, 'Whoa!'?" -- The G35 just didn't do that for me.
  • imadroneimadrone Member Posts: 33
    Thanks to all for the advice. Decided to await the 2004 325iT and pick up in Munich in mid-late October. Any info re changes or new options (3.0L in the Sport Wagon?)will be most appreciated.

       Eengstro, you are so correct about the coast highway north from San Simeon, the Lost Coast north of Mendocino, and highway 299 from Eureka/Arcata to Redding. Superb driving experiences. Years ago, I counted 94 curves in the 7 miles from Buckhorn Summit to the French Gulch turnoff, just west of Whiskeytown Lake. Test drove a MB AMG C36 that we considered purchasing on that stretch back in September, and that is what convinced us to cancel an order for a 2003 Passat wagon and purchase a 3-Series instead. I'd forgotten how much pleasure a really well made performance sedan can be.

       Saddled up the '68 Benz 280 SE for a leisurely drive up to Mt. Shasta yesterday. 'twas one of those flawlessly mild and clear late autumn days---70 degrees, unlimited visibility, shorts, sandals, T-shirt. Lake Shasta, Castle Crags, the Sacramento River Canyon, Bunny Flat at 6950'; all magnificent from the comfort of my Teutonic Buick. Still amazes me that the Germans were so technologically advanced 35 years ago--fuel injection, power everything, 4 wheel discs, tight steering and suspension, fine visibility, and a strong and efficient 180 HP straight 6. Was lucky to find it in immaculate condition from the original owner, and love that it looks like a little old blue-haired lady's car. Definitely a sleeper, and one that I shall always treasure. But surely looking forward to the 325iT for those tight mountain and coastal curves. My wife's 320i handles well even after 20 years, but at 101 HP is ridiculously underpowered. Enforces driving discipline though. Do enjoy your trip north for X-mas, and be safe.
  • jmessjmess Member Posts: 677
    Go with the Xpel type clear, you won't regret it. You have year round protection without all the down sides of Bra. If you read the fine print that comes with a Bra you are supposed to remove the Bra every time it gets wet. Not very practical on a day to day basis.
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    Even though I can pick up stations far away, the AM side of the radio is just plain lousy.

    I guess I don't understand-are you having trouble picking up stations or do they sound lousy? It is AM radio after all. I never expected AM to sound as good as FM or CD.

    -murray
  • mschukarmschukar Member Posts: 351
    I plan on buying an auxiliary adapter ( http://www.soundgate.com/products/aux-in/bmw.htm ) for my 325i so I can plug in my iPod without sending it through the airwaves.


    Installation looks pretty basic, but I wanted to solicit any advice on removing the factory radio and trim so I can mount this thing behind the dash. I'm not sure yet if it requires power, but does anyone know which wire I should splice into?


    Also, has anyone removed the little cubby and door above the ashtray? I was thinking of running the 1/8" stereo plug into there so it can be stashed away when not in use.


    I can't wait, enough music to drive across the country without a repeat and great sound!


    -murray

  • jimbresjimbres Member Posts: 2,025
    Congrats on your purchase & my compliments on your tasteful color combo. You're going from a '92 Honda Accord (per your profile) to an '02 BMW 330i? Then you're in for the time of your life.
  • ryokenryoken Member Posts: 291
    '03 BMW 330i. And it's coming from a 4-cyl automatic pre-VTEC Accord, with bad CV joints.
  • bmw323isbmw323is Member Posts: 410
    I too, have looked at the G35, but have not driven one yet. There is only one dealer here and they are some distance away. However, I would also like to look at the 280hp coupe. Did you drive one of those? From your test drives, it seems you believe the 330 is just as fast as the G35. Did they really feel similar in speed? What about handling? And how about roominess? The G35 seems like it would comfortably seat four full size adults. The 3 series doesn't - leg room in back is too tight for adult men. Finally, the price should have been at least $5,000 less for the G35, similarly equipped - right?

    Sorry for so many questions, but I was just getting ready to test one myself and your review was timely. I know what you mean about the BMW's feel, it's addicting. I hate to look elsewhere for my next car, but the Infiniti is becoming a good competitor at a lesser price.
  • ryokenryoken Member Posts: 291
    I didn't try the coupe. I just like sedans better than coupes. I think that's one of the things that turned me off the Infiniti.. the fact that they give the manual tranny and extra 20 horses to the coupes only. Same thing that Honda does with the Accord and Acura CL/TL (no stick with the 6cyl and 4 door). BMW offers all the options on the coupe, sedan, and convertible. I'd like to see a 330i wagon on sheer principle.

    Yes, the G35 is bigger (and has reclining rear seats and A/C vents). It's a "midsize" car while the 330 is a "compact" car. Handling on both cars was great. (After all, the E46 chassis was designed with the M3 in mind, and the G35 is using the same chassis as the new 350Z.) They both felt quick. The G35 is measurably quicker, but I couldn't feel the difference. The G35 can stop quicker - about 15 feet less in 60-0, according to magazines. The price is closer to $7k less, comparably equipped, I believe (on the sedans - don't know about the coupes). My local Infiniti dealership had a single demo car for test drives, and they wouldn't let you drive anything but that one - and it did not have the sport-tuned suspension. I think the BMW with the sport suspension has a smoother ride than the Infiniti without it.

    The Infiniti transmission doesn't have a true manual mode, it just lets you limit the top gear. But that, and the lack of colors it comes in are my only complaints, and the 6-speed sticks are available now on the coupe, and in production on the sedans and should be arriving in a few months.

    I've got some gripes about the 330i that I don't have yet, as well. Why can't the seatbelts and dash be the same color as the rest of the interior? And where's the 6-disc in-dash cd changer that all the other cars in this class manage to include?

    Give the Infiniti a try. I wouldn't regret owning it instead of the BMW. And the way I see it, a little real competition can only improve the 3-series.
  • riezriez Member Posts: 2,361
    mschukar... The AM reception in my wife's '00 323iA is absolutely atrocious. It can't hardly bring in powerful stations. Can't get anything from much distance. And there is terrible electrical interference in weaker stations. Almost as if not properly ground. This has happened with both the original and 2nd radio (she had it completely replaced once mainly due to CD ejection problems). And she has had it in the shop twice just for AM radio reception. The dealer said they did the TSB as you mentioned. I'll have it worked on again.

    The AM radio reception in my '98 540i6 is better, but still poor. Can't pull in weak signals. And it doesn't seem to be able to get powerful stations unless you are within 50 miles. But at least no electrical interference.

    AM is critical to me. Don't know about you, but I spend way more time listening to AM radio than FM. If I want music, I play CDs. If I want radio, then I'm listening to NPR, local talk, or national talk (e.g., Limbaugh, Beck, Reagan, Savage, Williams, etc.). Only FM I listen to is the Omaha FM NPR station.
  • dave330idave330i Member Posts: 893
    "And where's the 6-disc in-dash cd changer that all the other cars in this class manage to include?"

    Because BMW is about driving, not listening.
  • brave1heartbrave1heart Member Posts: 2,698
    I drove 170 miles in 5 F weather this morning and my 325 felt a lot faster. 70-90 mph in 5.5 seconds (4-th gear) - not bad for a wimpy 2.5 ltr. I was reading on one of the Miata forums that every 4 degrees difference in intake air temperature bumps up HP by ~ 1%. Does anyone have facts/links to substantiate that?

    I have 300 miles on the snow tires and they've been getting better. The car is noticeably wobblier at any speed compared to the summer tires The good news is that the car is not any more unstable at triple-digit speeds than it is at 60 mph. The M2's were great in the snow but I really miss my summer tires in the dry and I think I'll be counting the days when they are going back on in the middle of March.
  • leenelsonmdleenelsonmd Member Posts: 208
    ry: congratulations on your choice and its timely arrival.

    Of all the cars in your comparison, I agree that the choice inevitably comes down to the G35 vs the 3 series. I have had quite a lot to say about this above and on the other forums. In my mind however, there still is no comparison. The g35 is a good way for someone to purchase a powerful car with a decent brand name for less money. There is nothing about it that is superlative in my mind, except for the power of the engine. In fact, it overwhelms the driver with its mediocrity--transmission, harsh brakes, plastic interior, unassuming yet uninspiring lines and exterior styling. The 3 series just does all of the important things better. Every time I get in my car I get this huge grin that is like a reflex--it is involuntary. There is no other vehicle that I have driven which does this to me (although a twin-turbo 911 probably would). I could go on and on.

    There are gripes about the BMW though as you have pointed out. It should have a in dash CD changer, an alarm system, matching dash and seat belts for the chosen interior, and a better stereo. I hardly notice these thing though because the important stuff is just perfect. I picked the black interior to take care of the dash and seat belt issue.
  • esq1esq1 Member Posts: 20
    You probably already know this, but cold air is more dense than warm air, which means you can get more energy out of the combustion process. This is why supercharged cars cool compressed air before sending it to the combustion chamber. It's also why pilots have to worry trying to take off on a hot day. Unfortunately, my math skills are lacking and I can't do the calculations Brave is looking for. The high school teachers were right, it DOES all come down to math in the end. Curses.
  • bgt1bgt1 Member Posts: 50
    Im sure this has been beaten up and debated on a ton of other threads but the last few posts on here have been comparing them and asking 'why a bmw' instead.

    The one big thing is keeps me looking back to the 330i instead of a g35 sedan or coupe is x # of years down the road. I LOVE the exterior of the g35 coupe and is really hot BUT the interior just is not very up to par compared to the bmw. The silver plastic in the middle just does not look so hot. The interior of the bmw is very classy and nice.

    I worry about how the g35 is going to age. I already know the bmw 3-series ages very well and gracefully. I see bmw's 2 models back that still look very very nice and classy. Will I be able to say that about the g35 in 6 years? Im just not so sure. And that unsureness is able to look into spending that extra 5k more IF I think this car is an option to keep driving 5 years down the road once I pay it off.

    Those are just my initial thoughts on why im leaning toward the bmw.
  • newtobostonnewtoboston Member Posts: 31
    ....I can't get myself to look away.

    I'm talking about the long-dead "What is this BMW Thing" thread from a year ago. Being somewhat new to the Edmund's townhall I've been reading it just for the heck of it. It took me a month just to get a third of the way through! There are some stubborn folks out there.

    No real point to this message, just thought I'd bring up what must be a painful memory for those who were around to experience it!
  • erickplerickpl Member Posts: 2,735
    I had my center console area removed when I put my XM in. There were a lot of parts lying around while the shop installed the stuff, so I am very happy I had them do it. That little cubby area would be a great place to leave your ipod, but you may also want to consider the armrest area if you have long enough cables to run through from the stero past the gear [non-permissible content removed] to the arm rest. Somebody posted a link to an install that used the armrest in a 5er that looked very nice.

    It is not easy, I don't think to take that center area off. But I get nervous doing that sort of stuff because I don't want rattles. :)

    -Paul
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    I never knew that thread existed, what a blast to read. I thought it was really funny how BMW drivers are tagged "for buying a car that doesn't really beat the competition in anything, and where the buyers are all yuppies and don't know a thing about cars (sic)". Talk about peoples prejudices. :)

    It was very painful however to read through.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    who cares?

    I mean, really, does it matter if to you if I have an M3 and either a) know all kinds of stuff about it, work on it myself, and race on the weekends or b) don't even pump my own gas, bought it because it was a "nice looking car, and a good color", and "I can finally afford it", and maybe I've "always wanted one."

    I come here to Edmunds to find people of similar tastes (and sometimes, differing tastes) for lively discussion. I don't come here to slag off people for buying a car as a fashion statement, or autocrossing a car that "wasn't meant to be raced", or buying something "too expensive" for their budget and lifestyle.

    None of that is my concern and a topic devoted to nothing but such tripe isn't either.

    -Colin
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.