Subaru Impreza WRX

1150151153155156224

Comments

  • uncaballerouncaballero Member Posts: 6
    Hi all, just got my WRX today and have put all of 16 miles on it. I noticed that their is a slight noise coming from the rear of the car (reminds me of a bearing noise) is this a normal sound for AWD.
  • phoodawgphoodawg Member Posts: 3
    Hey All nice to meet everyone! I am new to this message board. I just recently got hired just out of school, and I would really like to be sitting in a black WRX with a roof rack and 17" wheels. I have a few questions for anyone who can answer them, I really appreciate anyone's help.
    1. Is there anyone on this board from the NY area and if so how are the insurance companies responding to the WRX? ie. are the rates outrageous? anything I should know being that I'm just 23 years old?
    2. Are the 17" wheels offered by the manufacturer a bit over priced or is it just me? Am I able to score after market rims for cheaper?
    3. Being that I spend a lot of time stuck in traffic, I am looking at an automatic. Anything bad about the auto, I have heard that it is indeed a bit faster.
    4.Anyone in here lease a WRX? if so what kind of deal did you get and what should I expect to pay for a 2002, or most important are there any 2002's still available that are significantly cheaper?
  • hypovhypov Member Posts: 3,068
    1. (a) Who in the NY area? Myself & bedabi [Brooklyn], Paisan & Bat1161 [Staten Islandd, bluesubie [New Jersey]
    correct if I'm off; fibber, jfl, & fsteve [Upstate NY]?...
    (b) Outrageous rate; no. But then, I'm not 23yo ;) Check out www.nasioc.com for comments of owners there.

    2. (a) OEM 17" pricing, yes.
    (b) Cheaper aftermarket, yes.

    3. (a) I a new owner of the 4EAT WRX wagon, and so far I've found nothing bad about it.
    (b) Faster?... nah. Maybe my imagination, but my WRX feels like it is spooled and rearing to go by 2500 rpm.

    4. (a) I didn't lease.
    (b) $$$ for 2002 WRX? I'll leave this to the more knowledgeable Crew Member. :D
    (b) There's a black WRX wagon 4EAT in Staten Island Subaru. Call Mark Jerrick (718) 979 0033.

    -Dave
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yup I'm here, hang with Hypov and Bat1161 often enough. :)

    4EATs are great :) especially in NYC.

    Mark Jerrick @ SI subaru rocks! :)

    -mike
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    A couple of answers:

    2. They are overpriced by about double. You can buy good quality aftermarket wheels for much cheaper, just make sure they are a Subaru friendly offset (48mm or higher)

    3. Things bad about the auto: measureably/noticeably slower (lose a second to 60), not as well suited to the peaky turbo engine, loss of fun from rowing your own gears, harder to resale (since most WRX are manuals). The good: AWD system is a more sophisticated VTD system.
  • cptpltcptplt Member Posts: 1,075
    the BBS ones are very pricey (what are they 3 grand or something!) but you can get the 17 in Legacy Turbo wheels for about 1300 which is comparable to many aftermarket wheels (Prodrive, OZ) or the 17in UK WRX wheels though that is still more than some aftermarket ones (Rotas, Sports Edition etc)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    You can can also get the $1500 17" wheels from the dealer that are also BBS, just not the expensive ones.

    -mike
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    2.The BBS wheels are excellent wheels that are priced for pretty much what it would cost you to purchase it from any other source. Those are forged and are superlight and are specifically made for the Subaru WRX. You can get cheaper cast-alloy BBS rims for half as much money...but then you are getting exactly what you are paying for. There are lots of cheaper aftermarket alternatives that would serve the same purpose. A good source for wheels would be tirerack.com.

    3.The Auto WRX is a great choice, even though a Normally Aspirated V6/H6 engine would not have turbo-lag. Turbo-lag is independent of transmission and you would face it in both the manual version and the Automatic version. The Automatic is slower than the manual version by around 0.4secs (6.3secs manual vs 6.7secs Automatic - sourced from Edmunds tests) but it is plenty fast as it is. Re-sale of Automatic equipped vehicles are always better than the corresponding manual versions, due to their universal driveability. Trade-in values are around 2000-2500 dollars more for Automatics but that would not be applicable if you intend to keep it for a long time.

    Later...AH
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Subaru sells both Forged and Non-Forged BBS wheels.

    Rotas are pretty good general rims and a good value.

    -mike
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    "Re-sale of Automatic equipped vehicles are always better than the corresponding manual versions"

    It depends on the vehicle. For a WRX, where 90% are manuals, I have doubts that the automatic's resale is better. In the case of a car like a Miata, automatics are notoriously poor resalers. One guy I know tried to sell an automatic Miata all summer (for what seemed to be a fair price), but then had to take a hit on a trade-in in the end.
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    According to Edmund's, the AT adds $681 to the retail of an '02 WRX sedan.

    JW
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Will increase re-sale value in suburbia and urban areas. Out in the sticks it will probably be a wash. IMHO.

    -mike
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    Used WRXes will probably be gone over with a fine toothed comb; I'd guess MTs even more so because of a reputation for weakness compounded by ham-fisted drivers. I don't think it's a car I'd want to buy used without a thorough inspection. You might get lucky and find one that was reposessed or returned by an owner unhappy with turbo lag, cargo space or the costs of insurance and premium unleaded.

    Begs another question: why doesn't Subaru get into the "certified used cars" game? Topic for discussion in another forum maybe.

    Ed
  • schizaschiza Member Posts: 31
    Subaru makes a solid car. Friends of mine have Subarus with over 150K miles with minimal maintanance. My WRX has 20K and it still drive's like new. I drive my car the way it was mean't to drive short of 4K clutch drops and it is solid, tight and smooth as ever. I can see being careful because the WRX is more likely to be abused ( combo of high performance and low price) , but any car treated badly will be trouble to the unsuspecting buyer.

    PS a lot of snow up here in Boston. The car handles snow well. No slipping and sliding unless you want it to and then things get real fun.
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    If you are buying this car for it's resale value, or most any car, for that matter... Forget it!

    Used vehicles of any kind are almost worthless nowdays. Due in part by all the Mfgrs giving so many deals and low financing rates. The market is flooded with used cars, if you trade something in on a new one, the best you can hope for is auction value on your old one. If you can afford to sell it yourself, you may get lucky and get wholesale.

    If you are buying this car for it's "assumed" long term durability, and intend to keep it for a while, then go for it!

    Currently, and probably for the next several years, it is not a very economical choice to pruchase any New vehicle intending to keep it just a couple of years.

    That's just my opinion, after taking a beating on the last several cars I've had.

    Ken
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    is strictly a result of popularity; the more popular the vehicle, the better the resale value. Here where I live (suburban/rural MD), most WRXs are 5-speeds—by far. That being the case, I would think an auto-equipped WRX (in my area) would be a liability, in terms of resale value.

    Bob
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    No disagreement with any of you. I've thought about buying a WRX wagon but would definitely buy one new.

    Ed
  • uncaballerouncaballero Member Posts: 6
    Hi all well finally got off the fence and jumped right into a Silver WRX. I put a whole 70 miles on the back roads through the forest WHAT FUN! HANDLES GREAT! LOTS OF POWER! WHAT FUN! going to work over the mountains to San Jose is going to be a blast! Now I was going to get the wheel upgrade but at that price hmm, now I was wondering if anyone has an 18 inch wheel and tire package on their WRX, I dont plan on lowering the car so I'm not really sure this combo will look good if the car is not lowered .
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    It's expensive to go all the way to 18 inches, and your ride will be pretty hardcore. I think it'd be too much to enjoy as a daily driver.
  • hunter001hunter001 Member Posts: 851
    18s are definitely overkill and if the roads are not of the super-smooth variety, then it would be torture driving the car. Add the cost of the larger, lower profile tires and the weight of the tires and it will hold down the WRX by quite a bit.

    I think 17s are ideal and anything more than that will detrimentally impact the car.

    Later...AH
  • stoner420stoner420 Member Posts: 165
    For some reason I feel like I want to get the complete STi short shifter mechanism, instead of just one of those short rods (like ILP, Kartboy, etc). Is that a dumb idea (probably ~$150 more with parts and labor)?
  • demichidemichi Member Posts: 9
    Looking to buy 2.5TS Sport Wagon ??? Shift or auto????
    How much can I pay??
    Any suggestions? Your opinions and advices will be very appreciated
  • herculespeanutherculespeanut Member Posts: 6
    So I test drove a Mazdaspeed today. It was nice. The engine was very smooth and power was instantly available. I am comparing it to a Subaru WRX and struggling to decide.

    On the one hand, the WRX has all wheel drive and seems to grip better. I felt the Mazda's front wheels slip accelerating out of a curve a couple of times. It is faster and (this is big) doesn't require a cool down for the turbo.

    On the other hand, the Mazda is much better looking, seems a bit larger, and costs less.

    Anyone here have any personal experience?

    Thanks
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    the prices might be closer than you think, since the WRX's are selling near invoice, and you will probably encounter markup on the mazda. The mazda is a handling machine, now with pretty good power.

    If the AWD and extra horses for not a whole lot more money aren't that important to you, the mazda is probably the better pure handler. I don't think it's significantly different in size than the impreza, you could check the stats on the edmunds web sites for the 2 cars.

    Good luck, drive both, and pick the one that puts a smile on your face and doesn't put too big of a dent in your wallet :)
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    The Mazda is a fun car, but ultimately I find FWD quirk's unforgiveable. The Mazda has a good dose of torque steer which makes it even more distasteful. I could feel it in the MP3 and I can imagine this Mazdaspeed is even worse.

    The Mazda *is* more unique but I don't like buying very limited car for the fact that parts might be hard to come by down the road. The WRX is common enough and the turbo engine has been proven. We can't say the same for the Mazda yet.
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    Mazdaspeed is the tuner arm of Mazda. They have a new (very yellow) ltd. ed. of the Protege -- pretty nice fwd vehicle.

    JW
  • schizaschiza Member Posts: 31
    I just commented on how reliable Subaru's are and my I noticed a gasoline smell coming from the engine bay and into the interior. The smell went away, but i'm bringing it for service tomorrow, anybody else have this problem?
  • uncaballerouncaballero Member Posts: 6
    Hey I'm new here and I have have seen a couple of post, saying something about turbo cool down, can anyone provide more details to a new rex owner.
  • philwang66philwang66 Member Posts: 61
    The official line from Subaru, IIRC, is that cooldown is not necessary. Something about coolant continuing to circulate for a time after engine shutdown.

    That said, if you've just been flogging the engine before you get to wherever you're going, it wouldn't hurt to cooldown (idle the engine) for a minute or so. Otherwise, just take it easy for the last mile or two.

    Hope this helps,
    Phil
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    He's right, Subaru states that you don't have to do anything special for the WRX. Just drive it normally. It isn't a bad idea to idle one minute before shutting the car off if you've driven the car HARD, but it strictly isn't necessary.

    What's more important than cool down is to switch to synthetic oil. Using synthetic is good for the entire engine especially a turbo one which places lots of stress on the oil.
  • phoodawgphoodawg Member Posts: 3
    One of my major concerns with the WRX is its gas mileage. For a four cylinder car i believe they state it gets 21 citympg. ANybody in here have any comments on the mpg of their WRX's and is the mpg so low because of the fact that it is a turbo engine?
  • wrxsoon1wrxsoon1 Member Posts: 158
    phoodawg,
    While I can't comment on my mileage (don't have one yet). I know I read somewhere in these Subie boards that someone just got about 30mpg or just over on a recent trip.

    As for why these cars get rather low mpg...turbocharged engine is part of it, also because they are quite heavy for a small car (due to AWD).

    -Ian
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Also AWD alone puts an extra 5-7% draw on power so I'd imaging gas milage is effected by the draw on power as well.

    Phoodawg, if you are highly concerned about milage a sports car like the WRX probably isn't for you.

    -mike
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    I don't mind the mediocre gas mileage as much, but I wish the tank had slightly more cruising range. If I baby it on the highway (60 mph or less), I can get 375 miles per tank but around town I only get 250 miles before I hit "E". What good is a fast car if you have to pit more often :)
  • robmarchrobmarch Member Posts: 482
    the website says 20/27 for the manual, 19/26 for the automatic. Basically, under boost conditions, the extra air being forced into the engine allows it to use more fuel to create more power. If you don't want to use this extra power, you can keep the car under 3000 rpm and stay out of boost.

    The RS, without turbo, is only 21/28 for the manual, though, so Paisan is right, the AWD probably is not helping.

    If you're comparing the gas mileage on these cars to other cars in this class(all manual):

    Honda civic EX 1.7L 127hp 114lb/ft 32/38
    Honda civic Si 2.0L 160hp 132lb/ft 26/30
    Nissan SER-V 2.5L 175hp 180lb/ft 22/28
    Impreza RS 2.5L 165hp 166lb/ft 21/28
    WRX 2.0L 227hp 217lb/ft 20/27
    Honda Accord V6 3.0L 240hp 212lb/ft 21/30

    The civics are lighter and have significantly less displacement than the RS. The Nissan is a little lighter, with similar displacement to the RS. The hp and torque of the V6 accord makes the city number similar to the WRX, but the gearing and no AWD allows a slightly better highway number.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    My 4EAT equipped SVX with 3.3L 230hp/230lbs AWD gets ~19/28 and since it's a Grand Touring Car, it has a 19.5gal tank. :)

    -mike
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    I watched European pro rally events all afternoon and rooted for the Subaru -- even my wife enjoyed it! I think it's probably the most enjoyable form of motorsport. Unfortunately, the Subaru team seemed to make bad choices of tires and had bad luck throughout. The Peugeots, however, were much more impressive. Go figger.

    JW
  • dop50dop50 Member Posts: 162
    I'm sorry, but I don't see the concern over the mileage.

    I think the car does very well considering the available power.

    I suppose if you nursed it, you could get 30mpg. But I generally average about 26-27 on the highway, but it varies a lot just running around locally. Probably between 20-24. I think one time I only got about 18-19, but I ran it pretty hard that time.

    I know it does a heck of a lot better than the Durango I used to have! I don't think I ever got more than 14mpg with that. Even with a strong tail wind.

    Let alone, the fact that the WRX is a blast to drive!

    I suppose it's all relative, if you want great mileage don't buy the WRX, but if you want to really enjoy your driving experience, with reasonable mileage, then the WRX is my car of choice.

    I figure by the time I drive for 3-4 hours, I'm ready to stop for a break anyway.

    Happy New Year, everyone!

    Ken
  • detteddetted Member Posts: 10
    I am not sure what to say with the mileage on a WRX. I am driving a 2002 Civic LX auto. It has a little over 34,000 miles on it and recently had a 30,000 mile dealrer mantenance done.
    It is rated 32/38 mpg, i am getting 24 mpg. Daily commute is about 10 mile highway and 10 mile local. It is an atuo, but it is driven like a manual, shifiting in to D3 and 2 often. At highway, it goes above 80 with ocassionaly passing above 95. It is a nice and fun car. Drolling a WRX though.
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    Took my WRX on a trip from L.A. to Phoenix.

    Gas mileage - 2/3 of trip at 78-80 mph @ 3200 rpm - 26 mpg.
    Going ~84 mph for 1/2 a tank, then mixed driving afterwards - 23 mpg.

    Replaced the regular oil with Mobil 1 after reading all the comments about synthetics at 13000 miles while in Phoenix.

    One question, what is the recommended oil replacement period? 5000 or 7500 miles?

    A Mobil oil filter was also installed.
  • btimmons710btimmons710 Member Posts: 8
    OK, I just spoke to someone in the service department at my local dealer who told me that Subaru recommends switching to synthetic oil at or after 15k miles for the WRX. Everything else I've heard and read contradicts that - the sooner the better - should I be worried about my trusty service department?

    Also, when I switch to synthetic, will the OEM filter be OK, or will I need something else?

    Thanks for putting my mind at ease...
  • twrxtwrx Member Posts: 647
    yes I am the one who got the 30 mpg. It was slower than I normally drive about one half the trip at 60 mph and the other at 70. The important thing here is the lllllloooooooonnnnnnnggggggg breakin period. New owners, your gas mileage will be lousy! 16 city and 24 highway for the first 3000 is what I got. After that I got 20 city and about 25-26 highway up till about 20000 miles. Now I still get 20 city (even if I take off fast from stoplights) and I got the 30 mpg. Seems to be very speed sensitive, I think I could get 31 or 32 if I actually drove 55 where it is posted as such. For those of you who drive a bit more briskly, here is the good news: about two weeks before my trip to Indy and the 30 mpg. I drove to Nashville with two passengers (and some extra weight in Xmas presents). I did 70-75 for that entire trip and averaged 27 mpg. I am now getting better highway mileage than I did with my '98 Forester although I usually got 21 city on the Froester. I expect that the taller less aerodynamic body was the reason for less mileage highway on the Forester. I am very pleased and very suprised that the WRX does this well (just be patient and wait for the 20k breakin!)
    TWRX
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    There is no "official" rule about switching to synthetic. Subaru makes no recommendation either way in any shape or form. I don't it matters when you do it, but sooner doesn't hurt. Conventional thinking says 10,000 miles, but the newer synthetics and engines can handle much much earlier. I did so at 6000 miles. It's good to stay with synthetic once you switch over. Using the OEM filter is perfectly fine if you plan to stay within the factory service intervals (7500 mile).
  • nschulman3nschulman3 Member Posts: 125
    My wrx gets driven mostly in stop and go city driving. Still, the 14-15 mpg i get on average is terrible. Another recent post mentioned the small gas tank. This does make the poor mileage even more annoying. By the way, my car drives great and the dealer can't find anything wrong with the car that would explain the poor mileage. I can only hope that as i put on more miles (I have about 8200 miles in 16 months) the mpg will improve.
  • bruticusbruticus Member Posts: 229
    0.9% Financing available on all 2003 Impreza (etc) now until March 3rd. No statement that the financing is not available on WRX.

    Anybody have backup info?

    DjB
  • kevin111kevin111 Member Posts: 991
    I drive in California, where there is smog, but do a great deal of highway driving. Would 7500 miles be legitimate for Mobil 1 or should I get an oil change at 5000? Just curious. Like the extended period of time between oil changes though.
  • sensei1sensei1 Member Posts: 196
    Totally agree with Ken. Can't get WRX performance from thin air. It's all a compromise and for the extra umph of the WRX, the mileage compromise isn't bad at all. I'm barely past 12K have driven from CA to WA and back. Averaged bet. 23~27mpg. Not bad at all with the fun I had.

    With the WRX, mpg should stand for Minutes Per Grin!! I really don't think it falls under "economy car".

    I'll keep TWRX in mind when I hit >20k.
  • WarpDriveWarpDrive Member Posts: 506
    Go with whatever your service manual says. My Canadian WRX has services at 3750 miles (I guess they classify all of Canada as "extreme conditions"). So I change mine around there. I believe your USA service intervals are longer (I remember reading 7500 miles).

    I don't mind stretching out the intervals a bit because I know that the oil is still good for much longer than that. On BMW's, their computers monitor and dictate the oil change interval and typically oil changes happen between 10-15K miles! I'm not sure how their filters are different, but I certainly feel safe running my car to 6000-7000 miles if I need to if my driving is mostly highway. One car expert said that mileage based oil changes are inherent flawed....it would have been better if manufacturers put in gauges that measured how long the car was running. That's partially what BMW does in their engine computers.

    However, if you run your cars in harsh conditions (dusty, cold, short trips), earlier changes are prudent.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    The change interval for any type of oil depends upon your driving. The only accurate way to determine the change interval is to have your oil tested, but 7500 is probably not out of the question for synthetic barring any "severe" driving conditions. Many European cars today have factory recommended change intervals at 10,000 miles, but they also have a larger oil capacities, however.

    Your filter, however, probably should be changed at the 5000 mile mark.

    Ken
  • rexaroorexaroo Member Posts: 174
    The best time to switch over to Mobil 1 is after
    the 1,000 mile break-in period. Waiting til the 3000 mile figure is OK too if it makes you feel better, but there is no point in waiting to 10K or 15K as this will only cause more of the engine wear you are trying to prevent by using a synthetic in the first place. Just my 2 cents after using Mobil 1 since 1992 in all our family cars and talking to the Mobil guys, SoA reps and countless mechanics on the subject. Changed our WRX wagon over at less than 1000 miles and the engine runs like a champ and needs to be topped up less than 1/4 qt. between changes. Others on these forums have reported excellent results changing over around 1000 miles also.

    Mobil used a 7500 mile oil change interval for their million mile test, but personally, I have a hard time going that long and change about every 4 months (or 3500 miles). The regular Subie filter, Bosch, and Pure 1 are all fine for synthetic oil, IMO, but hopefully, Mobil will at some point make available its excellent Mobil 1 synthetic filter for the WRX.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.