By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
pete, welcome to the Few, the Proud, and the Grinning.:) The car is every bit as good as it seems to you right now. re tires, I just started on my third set of Firehawks. There are better handling tires, quieter riding tires, etc., etc. but the 'Stones are an excellent all around tire. Pretty darn good grip on dry roads, and decent wet and winter performance unless you drive in deep snow a lot.
Flogging the obvious, I'll admit.
Quick question on accessories - what are the costs of a wind screen for the moonroof and a rear spoiler? Also, are there any other toys I should be considering??
Note to all Bimmer seekers - I owned a 3 series, and it was a great car, but it was small, underpowered, everything seemed to be an option, and service required a 2nd mortgage...
I've never heard of a windscreen for the moonroof, but know several people with spoilers and I'm confident you'll run into them.
Just my thoughts
All I'll say at this juncture is that the '03 LS is one hell of ride and further reinforces my view that the LS is THE BEST PERFORMANCE SEDAN for the dollar. In fact, it is simply the best handling sedan of the bunch, though the BMW 530 is a great handling car too and is uncannily similar in feel. These 2 cars are head and shoulders better handling cars than anything else out there.
In contrast, the CTS steering wheel had a very heavy feel to it and just didn't feel as agile as several of the others. The M45 comes across as Infiniti markets it . . . an intelligent muscle car. With 340 hp, the power is quite evident, though the steering is numb, the ride very stiff and choppy, and handling, well, I won't go there. The Lexus GS430 is quite competent, though the seats just aren't performance oriented and you slide around in them alot when tossing it through the twisties. Again, the steering wheel feel just isn't nearly as communicative as in the LS (even compared to my "old" '00 LS sport).
To me, the biggest and most noticeable changes to the LS are cosmetic . . . better interior materials, which everyone, I imagine, is already familiar with. Nonetheless,they are much improved and quite noticeable. The Nav system and THX sound system were very impressive too.
Mechanically speaking, the ZF steering is razor sharp, though a little too much power boost for my taste, and as I stated earlier, uncannily similar in feel to the BMW 5 series. If you were blindfolded and placed behind the wheel of these cars, you'd be hard pressed to feel a difference. The 30 HP boost in stock performance is noticeable, though only marginally so. My updated '02 airbox and Borla catback system on my '00 LS close the power gap to less than 20 hp.
Since I own my LS, and have no real problems to speak of, I'm not inclined to incur new debt on a replacement right now. If my current LS were to be stolen or 'totaled' in a wreck . . . I'd be into an '03 LS in a hearbeat!
Results: LS ties with BMW530i Sport model in terms of handling feel and performance. If people honestly evaluated both the LS and the 530i Sport and drove them both at the limits, they would find virtual twins. BMW has a great engine and you can get it with a manual. Lousy storage space on the inside. Center console doesn't even open. No adjustable pedals. Weird cupholders.
CTS is a dud. Heavy and numb steering, understeer prone. Not a sophisticated product. Caddy has a way to go. P.S The LS development team were at Nurburgring (not to mention Spa Francorchamps, Willow Springs, Laguna Seca, Grattan, and Thunderhill) about 5 years before Caddy was.
The M45 is a typical musclecar, all engine no handling. Great torque monster of a motor. Would love to have it in the LS. Prodigous amounts of understeer. Good car for a straight line or as a boulevard cruiser.
The rest were also-rans.
Botton line: Anyone who does an honest evaluation of a 2003 Lincoln LS versus a 2003 BMW 530i Sport model will see how identical they are. The Caddy and M45 don't even come close. Hats off to the Lincoln LS team.
I live in NJ and just went through that snow storm that dumped about 6" in my area. My '01 LS V8 Sport w/AdvancTrac handled it with no complaint. I'm riding on the original Firestones w/32,000 miles.
There were several areas going up hills when the traction control was working hard to keep me going but I never got stuck even in areas where the traffic was all screwed up because of stuck cars.
Keep in mind that it is my humble opinion that good snow performance is more a product of the driver than the car. I am pretty experienced in handling snow and never got stuck when I owned a Mark VII LSC (no traction control) which was definitely not known for its good snow manners.
Joe
Also, any MTX models in the test? Was the CTS a "Sport" model? My guess is that the CTS "killer" motor for next year won't overcome it's other handicaps.
The M45 looks like it belongs on a railroad track. What a waste of the Q's drivetrain, especially at that price.
I'm glad the BMW was the 530i and not it's little brother. This makes for a fairer comparison. The current 5 series is getting a little long in the tooth, and a replacement is due soon. The Bimmer has done about all it can with it's Mcpherson-strut suspension.
No one has commented on a price comparison. With the LS going up in price for 2003, is the BMW still that more expensive?
I don't know why the G35 wasn't included except that Lincoln doesn't view it as a competitor. My guess is it's not luxurious enough and they already had the M45. Or maybe they just simply couldn't get one to test with. Maybe they told Brian?
No manuals which makes sense since the 2003s don't offer a manual. The CTS was a Sport model.
Also, parts and service over the long-haul has got to be an important factor.
I have a 96 Volvo 960 Wagon also and at 53,000 easy (wife unit miles), I have spent a fortune already. Complete brakes two months ago- $1500!
Minor stuff last Summer another $700. Now I need a timing belt, so that means water pump and idler pulley, timing belt, regular belt, and labor.
So I am not a fan of European cars.
The LS has been, except for the power window recall, trouble free. If any car deserved to break under my ceaseless pounding, my LS is it. I have explored it's every limit, and it has met the challenge.
When lease time is up in July, I will explore buying it if I can obtain an extended warranty that has any honest coverage.
I just happen to know where to get such a warranty. I have one. It covers just about everything except normal wear items, i.e. brake pads, tires, wipers....., and it is a Ford warranty. Let me know if you're interested.
"Great News! Ford Motor Credit has selected you to participate in a "Early Bird" program. The program works like this, Ford Credit is willing to make up to 7 payments for you on your current leased vehicle as an incentive to either lease or purchase a new 2002 Lincoln LS.
Please contact me ASAP to review your eligibility and to go over the details of the program."
Hey Guys, does this smell funny? I lack a lot of details but maybe you have seen this one before.
Are there that many leftover 2002 LSes???
Straight ahead traction in deep snow is not the LSs strong point, but the TC does help. I get by with all-season tires; if you have to drive in deep snow very often, you'll probably want real snow tires, like Blizzaks.
And, like Joe says, there's no mechanical substitute for driver's care and skill. Around here, nearly all the vehicles off the road during a snowstorm are 4WDs.
Then I looked over at Edmunds' used car site, and found out that my low mileage, $39,000 new, 2000 LS is now only worth around $17,500-$18,000. I'd be looking at $15K-$16K just to move up 2 model years.....I think I'll keep it a little longer...maybe a LOT longer!
Interesting part is the agent didnt ask "V6 or V8". Nor did she ask for the VIN.
Hey Stan also notice they said on a 2002. If this is the case not only would you be guaranteeing them more cashflow but also buying their slow moving product.. Sounds like a win-win for them. I would up the ante and ask them about the 2003, or Wait until Jan, when they will move the 2002, so they don't get hit with inventory tax.
This is of course if you are serious.
Regards,
Airwolf1000
Has anyone on this board purchased or leased a 2002 MTX? What is the manufacturing date?
I test drove an autumn Red one over the summer.. Who know they might still have it.
Borman Auto Group
470 West Boutz Rd.
Las Cruces NM 88005 |
|
(505) 525-4500
(800) 376-CARS
Not many manual LSs were built in the 2002 model year, but there were SOME. Heritage LM in Tustin, CA shows one in stock; it's a black/charcoal LSE with the all-season package (AdvanceTrac/heated seats) and MSRP is $38,895. You can see the window sticker by going to the dealer's website & searching inventory at:
http://www.tustinlincmerc.com
Galpin Ford/LM in Prescott, AZ has a manual that's white pearl/graphite. It also has the all-season package and MSRP is $37,075. Galpin's website is:
http://www.galpinonline.com
There are lots of '02 automatics out there; you can search dealer inventory via the club website OR the Lincoln website.
Hope this helps.
I wonder if these two dealers feel they have something dear or they can't wait to sell their orphans.
I may end up buying my LS at the end of the lease. It could be a bargain I can't pass up!
Go figure.
My lease is up in July so I was surprised they called me this early.
Looks like a lot of us are getting this.
It would probably be a relatively good deal for folks who like to drive a new car always. But I would wait on the 2003's.
I got a letter telling me that I am "pre-approved" to lease or buy a Lincoln costing up to $45K with no money down, when my lease is up, but no early turn in offers.
Sure enough, the reservoir had a small crack. Not very common, I guess, as it will take 3 days to get another bottle.
I had the same problem with the Volvo wagon's reservoir at the 4 year mark.
Like duh. Plastic bottle under 15 psi at 200 degrees. Cooling and heating cycles every day. Not exactly neutral ph with Prestone.
Now bottles like this were no problem when they were used as "coolant recovery" systems. No pressure, not much heat.
But both my cars have this plastic reservoir as part of the system, with coolant circulating thru these things. That's a lot different.
Now the radiator is partly plastic. But it isn't thinner, see thru plastic.
This may be the achilles heel of the modern car's cooling system.
Periodic replacement might not be a bad idea.
The dealer gave me a Mercury Sable GS built 4/02 with over 18k already on the clock. Clean inside and out except for the cigarette smell.
Has some features I don't have on my LS and I have the "convenience group".
Has courtesy lights underneath the side mirrors. Has an auto-dimming mirror with compass readings. Cool.
Has single CD slot but I miss not having a cassette player.
The A/C has no digital readout or dual system. Has no compressor switch so I can't just vent with the fan.
Tried to take my 25 mph off-ramp at 50 mph. The rear end started getting twitchy and I thought that funny for a FWD. The LS can do over 60 mph with no complaints.
The Sables suspension is not anywhere as compliant as the LS. The LS has about as much suspension travel as Ivan Stewar's Baja Toyota in comparison. The Crown Vic I drove once was worse than the Sable. Short, sharp choppy movements.
The engine is a lower status 3.0 Duratech. Not as smooth as my 3.0 DAMB headed LS. And when you step on it, not much happens. The auto just seems to absorb torque. I'm used to jerking my neck everyday I guess.
My LS has the Borla so I'm not used to too quiet a car. But I can hear everything inside and outside with the windows closed in the Sable. It makes you appreciate the level of cabin noise isolation and the level of NVH work done on the LS. I had to turn up the radio with the increase in speed.
Also, it's easy to speed in the LS without realizing it. In contrast, you can judge your speed in the Sable by the increase in noise and vibration.
Typically for FWD, it has a rotten turning circle. Isolation is also poor from mechanical noise and vibration from the drivetrain. It reminds of my B.I.L's 96 Accord. Not a mechanically quiet car at all.
So the LS's weight has to do with refinement. It's thick glass and sandwich insulation makes for a quiet car. RWD keeps the drivetrain out of your steering wheel. It all adds up in cost and weight.
I have not driven alot of cars like Brian and Leadfoot have. But these NVH factors are important over the long haul. A lighter car might feel somewhat less refined.
The 2003 LS cuts 6.7 in 0-60. The lighter G35 does 6.2. One half second is probably the weight difference talking.
If I didn't have to haul bodies around, I would get a ZO-6 and lose my license. I want to get into the 5 second range in my next car.
Why is there such a difference between two doors and four?
Like add two doors and add two seconds. Cars don't have to be like that.
In July, I may just buy my lease out on the LS MTX and lease a two-door toy with the right numbers. Then I would have the "best of both worlds".
Oh, my dealer here in San Diego has a load of Navigators out front. Looks like the Great Wall of China. 20-24" Pimpmobile wheels are definitely in. I bet the dealer just adds them in as an option. Hey, it's better than vinyl roofs. I'd barf if I saw one of those on a Navi.
Anyway, my lease is running out in July and since my Jeep is paid for I am considering driving it for a while and saving up for a nice used 911 or vette. Since my wife has the minivan I am not sure I really need the sedan anymore. And the price for a used car and the jeep together is what I pay for the LS....
On the other hand. I love the LS. I can't wait to drive the '03....
I owned a 2000 LS8 since June of 2000. Had one of the first ones, it had been a "show car" and was fully loaded. Had it on a 3 yr lease and extended the lease for 6 months so I could get a 2003 LS. Ordered the 2003 LS from my dealer. Dealer could not get a delivery date. Kept putting me off, said he could not get a commitment from Lincoln. Got a call from Ford credit saying I had to turn my car in at the end of my lease extension, so not being able to get any kind of delivery date from the dealer--they said maybe early 2003, (could not get any info.), so turned in my LS and leased a Lexus GS430. Asked the dealer when I turned in my LS if he knew when the 2003 was coming in. Still said no information and no lease information. He then tells me that since I had a car on oder, Ford credit should not have told me I had to turn the car in at the end of the extension. The coordination between Ford credit, Lincoln, and the dealer was incredibably inept. Dealer said he was losing another customer who wanted a 2003 LS to BMW because they could not wait any longer. Two days after I turn LS in, but after I leased the Lexus, the dealer notifys me--guess what--the 2003 LS came in. Too late for me.
How can this happen that the car is shipped but no one knows?? If I had known, I could have waited the extra few days.
While I like the GS430 so far, I would have been happy with the the new LS. Now Lincoln may have lost me for good, who knows? This was a stupid way to handle my order and my lease.
I won't be monitoring this board any more as I no longer have an LS. Was a great car and I really enjoyed it.
There is absolutely no substantive evidence of LS airbags not deploying in accidents. Have you checked the NHTSA website to see if there any complaints about this?
I've found that there are lots of misconceptions out there regarding airbags. Front airbags are designed for frontal impacts and there is a threshold speed at which they deploy, usually around 12-14mph.
The LS has been named one of the 10 safest cars of all time. You stated that the back third of the car crumpled. That's exactly what it's supposed to do, it's a crumple zone. I'll bet that the passenger compartment remained intact. Therefore, you survived what was apparently a significant collision, there was no fire and you're here to talk about it. I think you should be thankful you were driving an LS instead of giving jeers to it.
DRolds, you mentioned the 'top ten' - whose list is it?
http://www.insure.com/auto/safestcars.html
It also named the '02 LS one of the safest of the 2002 models. Here's the article:
http://www.insure.com/auto/safecars/2002models.html
The LS was also in the top five vehicles with lowest risk of rollover according to NHTSA:
http://www.cnn.com/2001/BUSINESS/02/13/rollover/
I couldn't find a top ten list...
I think the car is quite nice compared to the BMWs and Lexus I looked at.
<<<<<<<Consider the list of service issues: Ball Joint, Window Motors, Poor Quality Paint (especially on the pillars), Condensation inside the headlamps, Constant brake squeal (for 40K miles!), occasional phantom warning sounds, and truly abysmal transmission (that eventually left me stranded in an empty parking lot).>>>>>>>>
Well gee I had a wheel bearing go bad before 20K. That wasn't on your list. Byt hey, I haven't had a ball joint go bad, my paint is fine and no brake squeal. My auto is the best auto I have ever driven. The damn thing shifts like my old Hurst controled Ford top loader.
<<<<<<<<Unfortunately, my LS marriage ended abruptly after being rear-ended at high speed. The impact was enough to crumple the back 1/3 of the car, yet the airbags did not deploy. I have recently heard of other major accidents where LS airbags did not deploy. >>>>>..
Can you name a car that the airbags deploy when rear ended? I don't think that's possible with the sensors located in the front of the car. I'll bet you've opened a can of worms with this one though. Now there's going to be a whole flock of lawsuits by lawyers/people who read your post and are rear ended and their front airbags failed to deploy. Not that they were supposed to but because the manufacture failed to incorporate this feature.
One of the reasons I have a continued interest in the Lincoln LS is its exceptional crash performance. Kudos to Ford for a job well done.
robers1, as someone who saw and "kicked the tires" on the '03 LS many months ago, and has friends who have extensively tested it, trust me when I say it will be worth the wait.
As others have said, I am happy that the LS gave it's life to make sure you kept yours!
On a side note, I find it quite interesting all the complaining about things that are fixed under warranty, on someone elses dime! Cars are MACHINES made by HUMANS. They will NEVER be perfect!! And for all you BMW defecters; Ask the guys on the BMW board if they would own one that wasn't covered by a warranty!
Since I'm spending over 500 per month for a 2000 V6 I jumped all over that. Yes I know the 2002 is one model year old etc, but not knowing what the 03s will go for, I paid them a visit.
They had about 7 cars. Two qualified for the 399. V-8 base cars. The cars I wanted had the All season, free moonroof, polished wheels and upgraded radio. Sticker 39 +. Reduced MSRP by 2K or so, took off the 4K and I threw in 1398. Business manager says 430. I say 399. He says you're killing me. You are getting 2000 extra (55 per month) for nothing, We agree on 415.
They take my car, note the 5 or so dings, dent on hood, yellow paint on bumper and charge me ZERO. Lease lady says, don't worry the inspector (who is real cute)is my friend. True to her word. Her boss comes over, puts his arm around me and says thanks for bringing the car back in such great shape. All I did was have it washed before I brought it in.
Apparently Ford Credit re conditions it and auctions to Ford dealers only.
So, I'll be around for the next 3 years with my new 02.
I got the 02. REally like the V8