Lincoln LS

1272273275277278299

Comments

  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,620
    Are you buying that Audi or leasing it?

     

    If buying, you have a spirit of adventure that many of us admire. I certainly do.

     

    I like Audi's. In fact, I really enjoy them, based on several work-related European rentals. I've spent quite a bit of time on their boards, probably much more than they would wish. The message that comes through (& through) is that they aren't reliable enough to last past the warranty, without "breathtakingly expensive" repair costs.

     

    An Audi is wonderful to drive and even better to look at (especially inside), but any number of the systems don't appear to last especially well. I'm not much impressed with "free" maintenance or warranty coverage, as the hassle of dropping off & picking up the car at the dealer to repair some glitch or other (even with a loaner) is intrusive at best.

     

    Anyway, keep us posted.

     

    My LS ('00 manual w/ almost no options & 74K miles on it) may have a blinking airbag light and a driver's side door handle that doesn't work (no doubt due to a window regulator repair that wasn't done properly), but I have some hope that most of the car will still function for the next 2 or 3 years. By then it will be seven years old and will have well in excess of 100K miles.

     

    Audi people rarely talk like this, or wish to.

     

    For that matter, most LS people don't either, but I do, and a significant number of people who buy (not lease) Asian vehicles do as well.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Don't want to burst any bubbles. bnut Audi's/VW's are quite unreliable. According to JDPower results, we are talking almost Kia like quality (or lack thereof). The last 6 years I've had 12 friends own VW/Audi's, and for ALL of them, it was constant issues they had in their vehicles... None returned to buy another.

     

    I'm hoping you aren't faced with the same issues. I myself am on my second LS (previous one reached 125K before trade-in) with zero defect. Only did one TSB for transmission re-programming and that's been it. So far my current one has also been defect free.

     

    Wish you luck though.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Yeah, I would say, if you don't like your LS, you're gonna hate your Audi....but whatever....

    Usually, I tell people who don't like their Lincoln, to buy a Lexus. It's their only hope for happiness in this world.
  • div2div2 Member Posts: 2,580
    Time will tell if the Five Hundred/Montego succeeds with buyers who aren't named Budget or Hertz.

    In my opinion, life is too short to drive boring cars. I do get most of my automotive thrills instucting/driving at track events but I still like to drive something interesting on a day to day basis. After a typical frantic day at the office I could not imagine facing the drive home in a minivan or FWD appliance. YMMV.

    Audis are great cars. To lease. The S cars are even fun to drive. Long term ownership is another matter. A friend of mine was a sales manager at an Audi/BMW/Porsche dealership. He maintains that Audis are 100000 mile cars at best. My wife considered a CPO A4Q Sport but(luckily for me) the Louisville Audi dealer ticked her off and she wound up with an E39 5er. That said, her next car might be a Ford product. Since we no longer need the big sled she's been looking at an RX-8...
  • jerrym3jerrym3 Member Posts: 202
    I only have 3,000 miles on my 04 LS8 Sport, but, except for the trans E at 16 miles, the car runs great, although it doesn't downshift (SST or automatic mode) to 2nd as smoothly as my 2003 TBird does.

     

    Two small issues and a question.

     

    The ashtray door in the center stack doesn't line up when closed, and the lower black rocker cladding on one side seems a litte loose. That's it-period.

     

    Now the question.

     

    When I depress the windshield defrost button, it doesn't come off just by depressing again. I have to hit the "off" button. Is this normal?
  • jerseyguy1jerseyguy1 Member Posts: 54
    I have had the opportunity to own (or be owned) by 5 Audis since the 1970s and now, my first LS. I'll let other people define 'reliability' but if it includes racking up lots of miles, then my Audis were reliable. My '87 4000 quattro had almost 190,000 miles on it when a ball joint bolt gave way and we junked the car. My 89 100 quattro had 185,000 miles on it when I sold it. It had a little over 220,000 miles on it when the wife of the person I sold it to was involved in an accident. She walked away, the car did not.

     

    Lots of electrical problems with all my Audis, however, Window switches constantly breaking. Steering rank on our '85 5000 needed to be replaced at about 45,000 miles. Lots of gremlins.

    Interestingly enough, my son just leased a 2004 A4 1.8 turbo quattro. He has only had it for a few months, but it is really a nice little car. Learning from my experience though, it is a lease and the lease expires when the warranty does. His dealership is only a few miles from where he lives and works and the dealership has a free loaner policy.

     

    Got tired of driving 30 miles form home to my local Audi dealer. So when it got time to get my wife a new car we decided to stay in town. Drove the LS and bought it. Got her a V6 with appearance package. With the rebates, discount, extra $$$ because we traded in her Cadillac, the dealer almost owed me money at the end of the day. Car has been OK. Several unscheduled trips to the dealer. Wheel speed sensor went bad 2 days after the 5,000 mile oil change and caused the ABS light to constantly stay on. Battery died one night. Had to jump start the car and take it to the dealership for a new battery. Just had a recall for a water pump hose.

     

    Is it a BMW? Not even close, but then it was $15,000 less than a new 530i. Is it an Audi A6? Again, no, but it is thousands less.

     

    I would certainly prefer a new A6 4.2 V8 to the LS, but $52,000 is more than I care to spend, the dealer is 30 miles away, and the local Audi dealership does not have the best reputation for service.

     

    My local LS dealership is Lincoln-Mercury only, no mega brands store, is about 2.5 miles from my house, and at least gives the impression of caring about its clients. Good enough for me.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,620
    I would interpret your message as, "you get what you pay for," in addition to which (news to me) Audis last forever, so long as you don't mind taking them in to have electrical (& other minor) stuff fixed from time to time.

     

    Thanks for the input.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • sdladysdlady Member Posts: 4
    Many thanks to all for the unvarnished input on the A6. After driving another A6, then an SRX, CTS and a Chrysler 300, the new car purchase on the back burner. I'm going to drive this &%#@* Lincoln until I find the right car. We have not considered Japanese makers in the past - maybe it is time to take a look. Stay tuned.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    My current "flawless import" experience is an Infiniti - and I'd gladly GLADLY swap you for your LS anytime, just call please. I wouldn't recommend you go looking to Nissan for relief from your woes.
  • gunnersmategunnersmate Member Posts: 243
    We have 2 Nissans, one lease and one purchase, running quite well right now and expect when the LS reaches the end of its life we will own/lease another. I love my LS but every time I visit or chat with my service guy I learn more reason for why not to buy Lincoln. Both have only been in for oil changes and tire rotations.

     

    But what dealer doesn't have shop full of their products. Should we depend more on disenfranchised owners or product evaluators like Edmunds, Consumer Reports or JD Powers.

     

    On the montego... I just dropped my 3rd Child, my LS, off at day care, the dealer, for more work. I now have an oil leak at a rate of 1 Tsp +/- a day on my garage floor and no telling what is being lost while on the road. At any rate.. They had some Montegos in the shop hoods up I asked my service guy if they were prepping for delivery then he explained how they are currently troubleshooting the fuel delivery system. 15 so far have had issues with the fuel system over pressurizing and flooding the car. Brand new cars about to be delivered to customers have died on the lot or shortly after leaving.

     

    The shop does not even have the technical publications yet no IPBs. They are fixing these cars with good ol' trial and error.
  • desertguydesertguy Member Posts: 730
    I find the Montego "fuel delivery system" issue very hard to fathom. They are using the same old Duratech 3.0 engine that has been in Ford cars for years and years. In fact that is the main complaint of the reviewers of the car. Still only 203hp so I would assume that there are few, if any, modifications to the fuel system.
  • gunnersmategunnersmate Member Posts: 243
    only conveying what I seen and was told. I am not trying create mass hate. He also mentioned the engine/power issue that it is a tried and true engine but lacks power.

     

    I seen 2 cars hoods up and fuel rails disassembled; I don't reckon it was on the account of because.

     

    It does look like a car that can gain an audience though given some changes to the body and extra horse power. I think it would look better wit nicer wheels and tinted glass.

     

    Is the AWD version going to have more HP. I havent really studied the car. I went to mercuryvehicles.com and tried to check but couldn't find powertrin info. Is that mercurys official website?
  • gunnersmategunnersmate Member Posts: 243
    Well I found the specs on edmunds... Isn't the big caveat for AWD autos supposed to be the launching speed or what I call the get out of your own way factor compared to non-AWD cars?

     

    Will the AWD perform as well as the FWD Montego when trying to get out into a busy hwy or 0-60
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    It will when the Duratec 3.5L comes out later this year. The FWD Montego/500 supposedly does 0-60 in 7.5 seconds even with the "puny" engine thanks to the CVT. I think it just feels slower than it really is. It's as fast or faster than most of the competition.
  • gunnersmategunnersmate Member Posts: 243
    I could give some serious thought to the AWD 3.5 if it has good get out of your own way power.

     

    I do not autocross and usually only find that I need the power for passing and entering the hwy. I do prefer a sport suspension though.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,620
    a few significant posts from early in the six years since this all began.

     

    THE FIRST:

    #0 of 601: Lincoln LS? (usauto) Thu 21 Jan '99 (06:22 AM) -- Anyone know price and/or availability?

     

    LS's BEST FRIEND's FIRST:

    jroger19 (jroger19) Sat 12 Jun '99 (05:20 PM) -- As part of Lincoln management, I want to thank all of you for your opinions and comments concerning the LS. We pay close attention to what you and other consumers think, and take that into account in a major way as we continue to develop our cars.

     

    As biased as I am, I will not give you my thoughts on the car or its competition other than the following:

     

    -- It is best to compare cars at similar price points. Companies, at a price point, have to make decisions concerning how to spend the cost dollars that are affordable. For example, Lincoln chose to put a V8 in the LS at its price point; others chose to put in a 6.

     

    -- Driving the LS and its competition at a race track, one after the other, is, believe me, an enlightening experience. There are very major differences at the limit. I wonder if any of those front-drive GM fans have ever experienced thier car at the limit?

     

    -- Cars at our drive events around the country were pre-production units, made at various stages, and the fit and finish are not really representative of production units. Please stop by your dealer and check out aproduction unit. Again, thanks.

     

    AND. . .DRUM ROLL. . .ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY MOST PRESCIENT:

    div2 (div2) Tue 11 May '99 (07:13 PM) -- The LS sounds like a competitive car. The problem will be with Lincoln's dealers, who don't know how to sell a car to someone who isn't a member of the AARP. Maybe they learned something from the MERKUR fiasco, but somehow I doubt it.

     

    Ah yes. . .the good ol' days.

     

    Now we've had no posts at all for well over two weeks, and only a few over 300 in the last six months. Time was, we did 36 in a day. Oh well. . .

     

    RIP
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    Good post, cd.

     

    Another nail in the coffin is a story on BON today about UAW worker protest at Dearborn concerning the Wixom plant has NO future cars in the plan. Hear that giant sucking sound? That's the jobs to build the 500, Montego, Fusion, Milan and Zephyr being whooshed off to Mexico. Wixom looks to be about to be turned into a shopping mall.

     

    Scuse me, Bill Ford? If you think I'm going to buy "The next AMerican sedan" after it's been made in Mexico, you're sadly mistaken. I'd rather buy a Totota made in Kentucky.
  • desertguydesertguy Member Posts: 730
    "If you think I'm going to buy "The next AMerican sedan" after it's been made in Mexico, you're sadly mistaken. I'd rather buy a Totota made in Kentucky."

     

    Great observation. I will certainly second that!
  • bob550kbob550k Member Posts: 148
    The LS went away to it's new home, it gave way to a CTS-V.

     

    2000 LS, V8, Red, 19" wheels w/275/30s mich pilots, Magnaflow X pipe cat back exhaust, tinted windows, 27,500 miles, leather, traction control and optional stereo, dual power heated seats, near showroom condition, no roof, no sport trans or suspension, no push button entry or nav. Well equipped but not loaded.

     

    Sold at $15,900 with two people fighting over it.

     

    Bye.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,620
    Well done!

     

    I'd have guessed (did, in fact) almost $4K lower.

     

    Enjoy that CTS.
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    I realize I need to add this to my admonishment of Bill Ford:

     

    Hey, UAW: you are also part of the problem. Wake up.

     

    "If you think I'm going to buy "The next AMerican sedan" after it's been made in Mexico, you're sadly mistaken. I'd rather buy a Totota made in Kentucky."

      

    Great observation. I will certainly second that!
  • leadfoot4leadfoot4 Member Posts: 593
    Yep, I remember those days all too well. The enthusiasm was so great, I actually went out and bought a Ford product...an LS, after nothing but GM stuff for over 25 years. The posts on this site

    were flying, and I could hardly wait to get to work in the morning, so I could log on and read all the new messages.

      

    Here we are, almost 5 years later, still have the LS. It's been a good car, however as most of us realize, the end seems to be around the next corner. ANOTHER orphan car in my garage. (the last was also a neat car, a 1997 Nissan 240 SX)
  • bob550kbob550k Member Posts: 148
    Holy Cow!

     

    I just looked in my garage and realized it's all GM in there! Who'd a thought?

     

    Enjoy your Lincolns, I have enjoyed all 6 that I have owned and will probably be back someday.
  • pnewbypnewby Member Posts: 277
    Much of the same here. I bought my early LS V8 because jroger19 and mark and others "officially" hung out here. If not for them, I would never have stopped by to try one out, and once I did, I had to have one. JR intervened with my dealer on my behalf and I got to almost be chums with his secretary. Traded the LS on a Freestyle, and I love it, but nothing like the early LS experience when JR and friends were here, interested and helpful. I helped sell several other LSs because of this, and I guess this was a one time experience. Haven't seen where any other manufacturers learned that this was good, and Ford obviously didn't learn from it. It was a great ride and I'm sorry it had to end. Just imagine what could have developed from this. Those were the years when Lincoln actually outsold Caddy.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    When Jim moved on his replacements were just not as passionate.

     

    That (along with the input from the engineers) was one of the things that attracted me to the LS. Jim helped me out with paint colors because when I tried to order mine they had replaced Cordovan with Autumn Red but nobody could show me what it looked like.

     

    We need more car people like Jim in leadership roles at the car mfrs.
  • jerrym3jerrym3 Member Posts: 202
    Any of you folks having battery issues? My TBird (and LS) have both been fine, so far.

     

    Many TBird owners are having repeated problems, my brother-in-law being one of them..

     

    The TBirdnest chatbox has a lot of owners complaining. Ford has even been replacing some switch that fails to shut the rear defroster off when you park the car.

     

    Since mechanically, the cars are very alike, I'm just wondering why TBirds have problems while LS's do not.
  • pnewbypnewby Member Posts: 277
    Seems like I remember a link for discount pricing of accessories, anyone know where that was?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    No, I don't recall anything like that on the LS. We've had a few premature battery failures but only a few and they aren't being repeated. If it's a switch or other hardware problem it must be unique to the Tbird.
  • lincolnlovlincolnlov Member Posts: 4
    Have noticed that the owners manual indicates fluid change intervals for various 4 speed transmissions but I found no recommendations for either of the 5 speed models in the LS. Been changing the fluid and filter in my Mark VII every two years and so far no problems with it at 140,000 mi. Has anyone gotten a definitive recommendation from Ford about fluid/filter changes for the LS 5 speed automatics?
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I generally follow the 30,000 mile change protocol with good results. But I live in hot climates, and don't like to press my luck with summers over 110 degrees.
  • lobsenzalobsenza Member Posts: 619
    One of the original design engineers said that the transmission is degined to go 100L or 150K (I forget which) without a fluid change. He then said that if it was his, he would change it every 30K. The fluid should be changed by a machine that pumps the old fluid out and pumps the new fluid in. You never need to change the trans filter.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    That is correct.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    How can you never need to change the filter? Filters eventually plug, or they're not doing their job. How can that work?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Easy - if there's enough crap in the filter such that it needs to be changed - you need a new tranny.

     

    The engineers have done extreme testing on the LS tranny and never saw a filter that needed to be changed.
  • lobsenzalobsenza Member Posts: 619
    Alan is correct. The transmission is designed and tested to go over 150K on the original filter. He specifically said not to drop the pan and to change the fluid only.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Alright - that I can buy. Thank you.
  • dclsdcls Member Posts: 32
    Recently had a set of new tires installed and immediately noticed a very slight vibration or rumble that seems to be coming from front and back. Strange thing is that it occurs between 40-50 mph, then almost disappears after 10-20 miles. Wheels have been balanced, air pressure OK. Had a half shaft replaced last year. Are they related? Any ideas would help me communicate w/ the tire place or the dealer. It's a 2001 V6.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    My guess is the tires are flat spotting and take 10-20 miles to "round out" again. Some tires are more prone to flat spotting than others. Also check your tire pressure. 30 psi (cold) is the OEM recommendation. Try 35 or 40 psi and see if that makes a difference.

     

    What kind of tires did you get and what size?
  • dclsdcls Member Posts: 32
    Kuhmos (sp), 16" standard size. (Recommended by folks on this forum). Didn't experience this w/ Continentals. I'll try the air pressure. What causes flat spotting??
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    "What causes flat spotting?"

     

    A 4000 lb car sitting on 4 small pieces of rubber. Look at the tire where it touches the ground. That part is flat and in some cases tends to stay flatter longer resulting in a less than smooth ride.

     

    It can be worse in the winter because the tires are cold and "hold" the flat spot longer until they warm up. Up the pressure and see what happens. You could also try parking on a carpet scrap or something else soft.
  • div2div2 Member Posts: 2,580
    I fitted Kumhos to both of my passenger cars. The Club Sport runs the 225/50ZR16 Ecsta Supra 712 while the 528i wears a set of 225/60VR15 KH11s. The 712s will flat spot after a few days of inactivity but the KH11s don't seem to share that problem. In any event, I'm very happy with both tires-especially considering the price: $70 each for the 712s and $50 each for the KH11s.
  • dclsdcls Member Posts: 32
    Should have been clearer. Why do these tire flat spot?? Only been driving for 45 years and this is the first time it's happened - all makes and models. Shouldn't have to up the pressure and compromise ride, park on carpet, etc.
  • jsylvesterjsylvester Member Posts: 572
    My brother will be buying an LS v-8 once his stock options mature later this year. He is considering a used one, but I've suggested he try to find a 2003 or later.

     

    I know there were a number of changes for 2003, notably the horsepower. However, my understanding is the interior was upgraded as well. What were the the significant 2003 improvements over a 2002?

     

    TIA
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Many many improvements. Many of them under the skin for the most part. Even down quieting the sound of the A/C Fan, for example.

     

    As a side note, this is the last year for the V6 LS, in case anyone else is wanting the V6 version.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    There were 500 improvements actually. Nothing huge outside of the VCT and HP upgrade on the engine, but a lot of small stuff like electronic parking brake, bigger console, Electronic throttle (may be an improvement or a degradation depending on your point of view), etc.

     

    They're practically giving away new V8s and V6s these days. You can probably get $10K-$12K or more off MSRP which puts a loaded V8 in the low to mid 30's while the V6 can be had for $25K. It's a steal.
  • chartrandchartrand Member Posts: 139
    Heard a radio announcement last week in Dallas for a new V8 with sunroof for $26K and change.

    That's Honda territory!
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    $26K for a new V8? Was it brand new?
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Every 1000 posts or so, I reaffirm my conviction that the Lincoln LS remains the most under rated sedan on the planet today. It just gets better with age, and if only it fit my needs, I would absolutely own 2 of them.
  • cdnpinheadcdnpinhead Member Posts: 5,620
    what it costs, and more.

     

    The question (which I think is mostly answered) is whether Lincoln will ever learn to market a vehicle like the LS such that it's sold for more than it costs (to manufacture), without huge rebates.

     

    With trucks and 25-year-old taxicab platforms, they're doing OK. With the LS. . .
    '08 Acura TSX, '17 Subaru Forester
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    "The question (which I think is mostly answered) is whether Lincoln will ever learn to market a vehicle like the LS such that it's sold for more than it costs (to manufacture),"

     

    Great question, cpn - and I agree. I'm hoping though, that consistent management from Bill Ford, may give the company some leadership that will give Ford, and the Lincoln division a chance to more evenly market the right products the right way. I've even heard the LS may be yet marketed as a performance sedan when the V-6 is dropped next year and the V-8 is what remains. Wouldn't that be nice? Wonder if they could afford to "freshen up" the sheet metal too?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.